CRIME Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre Suspect Darrell E. Brooks Hit with 71 New Charges - UPDATE, Guilty, post 174

Red Baron

Red Baron

Paleo-Conservative
_______________
50,781 views Oct 19, 2022
The state's case against Darrell Brooks in Wisconsin is winding down as he faces more than 60 charges for allegedly driving through the Waukesha Christmas Parade in 2021. The Law&Crime Network's Angenette Levy takes a look at some of the most bizarre moments from the case so far.

12:47

Most Bizarre Moments in Darrell Brooks' Trial So Far

View: https://youtu.be/60g2t2zCr9g
 
Raggedyman

Raggedyman

Res ipsa loquitur
Red Baron said:
Brooks is trying to pull that whole "Sovereign Citizen" thing.

Don't ask me to explain it.
Click to expand...
my tard-in-laws dah judguhz seem to be of the opinion that the sovereign citizenship filings are a real PIA for the courtsystem. truth told I PRAY THAT IT IS. let them be buried under the same mountains of meaningless BULLSHIT that they take such great pleasure in heaping on we lesser beings - we mere mortals . . . the LAW has become a way to avoid personal responsibility, morality and common sense. under the current TWO TIERD SYSTEM we are very much LESS FOR IT as a nation
 
M

Mixin

Veteran Member
packyderms_wife said:
what does he mean by "the state of wisconsin"?
Click to expand...
It goes something like this: He has the right to question his accusers. So he asks the witnesses if they filed a claim or if they received a subpoena. Then he asks who sent the subpoena and they usually say "The State." Then he asks who is the state and have you ever talked to the state? Sometimes he throws a bunch of other stuff, ending with "is the state a person or an entity?"

Every time the mention his name, he says: "I object to being called that" and then goes on to tell them why. One reason he uses is most of his official documents have his name spelled in all capitol letters and he says that's not his name. He totally confuses the witnesses who do know he is Darrell Brooks. He's getting really testy now and often objects to almost every question the prosecution asks.

This trial is horrid and the people impacted by his crime don't deserve what they are being put through. As much as we dislike our court system, no one will want this to gain popularity except for the other criminals. I'm pretty sure when Darrell Brooks goes to prison, he'll pursue his "legal career."
 
Raggedyman

Raggedyman

Res ipsa loquitur
Perhaps ^^^this^^^ is the reason the in-laws dislike the sovereign citizen filings as much as they do. To be honest I can see their point by virtue of what‘s been described above.
 
packyderms_wife

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Mixin said:
It goes something like this: He has the right to question his accusers. So he asks the witnesses if they filed a claim or if they received a subpoena. Then he asks who sent the subpoena and they usually say "The State." Then he asks who is the state and have you ever talked to the state? Sometimes he throws a bunch of other stuff, ending with "is the state a person or an entity?"

Every time the mention his name, he says: "I object to being called that" and then goes on to tell them why. One reason he uses is most of his official documents have his name spelled in all capitol letters and he says that's not his name. He totally confuses the witnesses who do know he is Darrell Brooks. He's getting really testy now and often objects to almost every question the prosecution asks.

This trial is horrid and the people impacted by his crime don't deserve what they are being put through. As much as we dislike our court system, no one will want this to gain popularity except for the other criminals. I'm pretty sure when Darrell Brooks goes to prison, he'll pursue his "legal career."
Click to expand...

Thank you for the cliff notes version.
 
Red Baron

Red Baron

Paleo-Conservative
_______________
Dennis Olson said:
A real judge would have addressed this asshole long ago.

This is a circus, and the judge is not in control.
Click to expand...
The legal pundits are saying the judge is giving Brooks a long leash so Brooks can't get a mistrial on appeal.

I see that strategy as setting a significant precedent for entitlement and poor conduct in the court.

Things really cannot continue as it is now.

Something is going to give.
 
packyderms_wife

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Red Baron said:
The legal pundits are saying the judge is giving Brooks a long leash so Brooks can't get a mistrial on appeal.

I see that strategy as setting a significant precedent for entitlement and poor conduct in the court.

Things really cannot continue as it is now.

Something is going to give.
Click to expand...

Can he get a mistrial if she holds him in contempt of court indefinitely? Also how about putting him in general population and letting the other prisoners know he's a convicted sex offender. I doubt he's making any friends inside the big house.
 
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
packyderms_wife said:
Can he get a mistrial if she holds him in contempt of court indefinitely? Also how about putting him in general population and letting the other prisoners know he's a convicted sex offender. I doubt he's making any friends inside the big house.
Click to expand...
Depends. If he’s a sex offender against white women, he’ll be a hero. If against kids, not so much.

What the judge should do is disqualify him from being his own attorney and assign him one. Then ban him from the courtroom.
 
Walrus Whisperer

Walrus Whisperer

Hope in chains...
I watched some of that a couple days ago, not only is she herding cats, but trying for some measure of decorum in her court. That azzhole has turned it into a circus. :hof: l suggest an Arizona biting ants anthill for him. May it be long, slow and painful.
 
thompson

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Muei4yp.png


jen7svy.png
 
M

Mixin

Veteran Member
packyderms_wife said:
Can he get a mistrial if she holds him in contempt of court indefinitely? Also how about putting him in general population and letting the other prisoners know he's a convicted sex offender. I doubt he's making any friends inside the big house.
Click to expand...
A person with legal knowledge said a contempt of court charge would delay the trial. No one wants that except Brooks. That's why he keeps saying he's in the other court room on contempt charges and that's why she keeps denying it.

I think most anyone who has watched this trial really, really despises this POS and some blame the judge. Her hands are tied as to the remedies she has. Even when he's in the other room, he can be disruptive. When she puts him on mute, he takes his headphones off. When she unmutes him, he ignores her, then claims he didn't know he was unmuted. Then he makes her repeat what she said, then takes more time to shuffle his papers and formulate an answer.

He's facing spending the rest of his life in prison, so there is nothing the judge can do to him that will make a difference. It's generally believed that someone is coaching him and he's a quick study. No one wants to see him get a mistrial or win an appeal. The judge is doing her best to get this trial finished and I have no idea how any other judge could do anything differently. Brooks might have had a little more respect for a forceful male judge but I doubt it. He went all ballistic when he thought he was told to sit down instead of being "axed" to.
 
Walrus Whisperer

Walrus Whisperer

Hope in chains...
I found myself wishing that there was a male judge, a male judge would have that POS backed into a corner and lightning bolts coming out of his eyes and mouth.
Maybe he should have rethought stepping on the gas and hurting and killing people with his car.
It is what it is.
If I'd been there? I'd have him chained to the chair and muzzle on like that movie I can't think of the name of now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top