ALERT 6 Dams at Serious Risk of Failing from Montana to Missouri - Expert says

imaginative

keep your eye on the ball

The Gavins Point Dam is cracking and it appears they are going to blow part of it to relieve the preasure as charges have been set this past week. Right now, the dam is taking on more water then it can safely release but watch what happens after the College World Series is over on 28 June 2011...
 
BK, can we revisit this statement in a couple of weeks?

You can revisit this statement as many times as you want. The guy in that video is a rube. A good friend heard from a friend who heard from someone high up, yadda, yadda, yadda. Did you know that that "story" has been circulating since the CoE first started releasing water? That that exact same story has been applied to all six dams? In fact, if any of the various versions of that story were true, all six dams would have been blown by now and the Smiling Scotsman would be floating off in Kansas somewhere.

Seriously, dude...
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
The Purposeful Flooding of America's Heartland

The Missouri River basin encompasses a vast region in the central and west-central portion of our country. This river, our nation's longest, collects the melt from Rocky Mountain snowpack and the runoff from our continents' upper plains before joining the Mississippi river above St. Louis some 2,300 miles later. It is a mighty river, and dangerous.

Some sixty years ago, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) began the process of taming the Missouri by constructing a series of six dams. The idea was simple: massive dams at the top moderating flow to the smaller dams below, generating electricity while providing desperately needed control of the river's devastating floods.

The stable flow of water allowed for the construction of the concrete and earthen levees that protect more than 10 million people who reside and work within the river's reach. It allowed millions of acres of floodplain to become useful for farming and development. In fact, these uses were encouraged by our government, which took credit for the resulting economic boom. By nearly all measures, the project was a great success.

But after about thirty years of operation, as the environmentalist movement gained strength throughout the seventies and eighties, the Corps received a great deal of pressure to include some specific environmental concerns into their MWCM (Master Water Control Manual, the "bible" for the operation of the dam system). Preservation of habitat for at-risk bird and fish populations soon became a hot issue among the burgeoning environmental lobby. The pressure to satisfy the demands of these groups grew exponentially as politicians eagerly traded their common sense for "green" political support.

Things turned absurd from there. An idea to restore the nation's rivers to a natural (pre-dam) state swept through the environmental movement and their allies. Adherents enlisted the aid of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), asking for an updated "Biological Opinion" from the FWS that would make ecosystem restoration an "authorized purpose" of the dam system. The Clinton administration threw its support behind the change, officially shifting the priorities of the Missouri River dam system from flood control, facilitation of commercial traffic, and recreation to habitat restoration, wetlands preservation, and culturally sensitive and sustainable biodiversity.

Congress created a committee to advise the Corps on how best to balance these competing priorities. The Missouri River Recovery and Implementation Committee has seventy members. Only four represent interests other than environmentalism. The recommendations of the committee, as one might expect, have been somewhat less than evenhanded.

The Corps began to utilize the dam system to mimic the previous flow cycles of the original river, holding back large amounts of water upstream during the winter and early spring in order to release them rapidly as a "spring pulse." The water flows would then be restricted to facilitate a summer drawdown of stream levels. This new policy was highly disruptive to barge traffic and caused frequent localized flooding, but a multi-year drought masked the full impact of the dangerous risks the Corps was taking.

This year, despite more than double the usual amount of mountain and high plains snowpack (and the ever-present risk of strong spring storms), the true believers in the Corps have persisted in following the revised MWCM, recklessly endangering millions of residents downstream.

Missouri Senator Roy Blunt agrees, calling the management plan "flawed" and "poorly thought out." Sen. Blunt characterized the current flooding as "entirely preventable" and told reporters that he intends to force changes to the plan.

Perhaps tellingly, not everyone feels the same apprehension toward the imminent disaster.

Greg Pavelka, a wildlife biologist with the Corps of Engineers in Yankton, SD, told the Seattle Times that this event will leave the river in a "much more natural state than it has seen in decades," describing the epic flooding as a "prolonged headache for small towns and farmers along its path, but a boon for endangered species." He went on to say, "The former function of the river is being restored in this one-year event. In the short term, it could be detrimental, but in the long term it could be very beneficial."

At the time of this writing, the Corps is scrambling for political cover, repeatedly denying that it had any advance warning of the potential for this catastrophe. The official word is that everything was just fine until unexpectedly heavy spring rains pushed the system past the tipping point.

On February 3, 2011, a series of e-mails from Ft. Pierre SD Director of Public Works Brad Lawrence sounded the alarm loud and clear. In correspondence to the headquarters of the American Water Works Association in Washington, D.C., Lawrence warned that "the Corps of Engineers has failed thus far to evacuate enough water from the main stem reservoirs to meet normal runoff conditions. This year's runoff will be anything but normal."

In the same e-mail, he describes the consequences of the Corps failure to act as a "flood of biblical proportions." His e-mails were forwarded from Washington, D.C. to state emergency response coordinators nationwide. The Corps headquarters in Omaha, NE which is responsible for the Missouri river system, claims they heard no such warning from Lawrence or anyone else. Considering the wide distribution of this correspondence, and the likely reactions from officials in endangered states, their denials strain credulity.

Whether warned or not, the fact remains that had the Corps been true to its original mission of flood control, the dams would not have been full in preparation for a "spring pulse." The dams could further have easily handled the additional runoff without the need to inundate a sizeable chunk of nine states. The Corps admits in the MWCM that they deliberately embrace this risk each year in order to maximize their re-ordered priorities.

MWCM (Sec 7-07.2.6):

Releases at higher-than-normal rates early in the season that cannot be supported by runoff forecasting techniques is inconsistent with all System purposes other than flood control. All of the other authorized purposes depend upon the accumulation of water in the System rather than the availability of vacant storage space. [Emphasis added.]

Perhaps the environmentalists of the Corps grew tired of waiting decades to realize their dream of a "restored Missouri River." Perhaps these elements heard the warnings and saw in them an opportunity to force an immediate re-naturalization of the river via epic flood. At present, that is impossible to know, but to needlessly imperil the property, businesses, and lives of millions of people constitutes criminal negligence. Given the statements of Corps personnel, and the clear evidence of their mismanagement, the possibility that there is specific intent behind their failure to act must be investigated without delay.

In recent decades, many universities have steeped their Natural Sciences curriculum in the green tea of earth-activism, producing radically eco-centric graduates who naturally seek positions with the government agencies where they can best implement their theories. Today, many of these men and women have risen high in their fields, hiring fellow travelers to fill subordinate positions and creating a powerful echo chamber of radical environmentalist theory.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is a victim/tool of the above-described process. The horrifying consequence is water rushing from the dams on the Missouri twice as fast as the highest previous releases on record. Floodgates that have not been opened in more than fifty years are in full operation, discharging water at a rate of 150,000 cubic feet per second toward millions of Americans downstream.

This is a mind-boggling rate of release. Consider that 150,000 cubic feet of water would fill a football field instantly to a depth of four feet. This amount of water, being released every second, will continue unabated for the next several months. The levees that protect the cities and towns downstream were constructed to handle the flow rates promised at the time of the dam's construction. None of these levees have ever been tested at these levels, yet they must hold back millions of acre-feet of floodwater for the entire summer without failing. In the flooding of 1993, more than a thousand levees failed. This year's event will be many orders of magnitude greater.

There are many well-publicized examples of absurd obeisance to the demands of radical environmentalists resulting in great economic harm. The Great Missouri River Flood of 2011 is shaping up to be another -- only this time, the price will likely be paid in lives lost as well as treasure. Ayn Rand said, "You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality."

We need to begin the investigations immediately. It seems that it is sanity, and not the river, that needs to be restored.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/06/the_purposeful_flooding_of_americas_heartland.html
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
High water in Fort Peck Reservoir inundates marina, campsites

BILLINGS - To make sure that his underground fuel tank isn't washed away like an enormous bobber, Bill Hinrichs pumped the container dry and dumped dirt on top of it as record-high water has inundated his Rock Creek Marina on Fort Peck Reservoir's Dry Arm.

"What can you do?" Hinrichs said, the roar of a front-end loader audible in the background, as he builds a dike to try to protect the marina. "I guess I'm better off than people downstream."

A record-setting year of moisture has raised the 134-mile-long reservoir to its highest level ever, an elevation of 2,252.3 feet as of Thursday. Full pool at the reservoir is 2,250. Inflows from the Missouri River, boosted by high water on the Musselshell River, have forced the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to release a record amount of water from its spillway - 52,000 cubic feet per second, 65,000 cfs when combined with the water being run through the powerhouse.

Yet the lake level keeps rising.

"If we could just drop back to normally high inflows, we'd drop pretty quickly at these releases," said John Daggett, the Army Corps' dam operations manager in Fort Peck.

But so far that hasn't happened, so boaters, anglers and campers traveling to Fort Peck Reservoir for a summer getaway should take note: Some campsites and access routes are underwater.

At Hell Creek State Park, north of Jordan, the 44 campsites outfitted with electricity and another 15 to 20 others are high and dry, but 60 more spaces are underwater, said park manager Dave Andrus.

"The lake will have to drop 5 feet before we'll get those spaces back," Andrus said.

Although Hell Creek Marina is open and has fuel, there is no potable water or flush toilets available.

***

Farther west, the road to the Crooked Creek boat ramp had an 18-inch slump that the county was supposed to repair. But the question may be: Why bother to go there?

"That part of the lake is still real muddy from all of the inflows," said Bill Berg of the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge, which surrounds the reservoir. "There's a lot of debris in the water, too."

At Fourchette Bay, the lower end of the campground is under standing water and about one-third of the sites are not accessible, Berg said. The two routes into the bay from the north are wet in spots.

The Corps closed off the Devils Creek boat ramp, south of Fourchette, because low areas were under water. Near Fort Peck, the Corps also closed the Flat Lake access east of the spillway.

Perhaps nowhere is the situation worse, though, than at Rock Creek Marina where the main access road is 3 feet underwater in one place. Visitors have to boat into the marina after taking another route to the lake, but even then Hinrichs can offer only grocery supplies and bait.

"I have no fuel, sewer or water," he said Thursday. "My whole campground is shut down."

Normally, the Fourth of July weekend would be the peak of his business season. This year, he would be happy to get 50 percent of what's normal. And he's worried that the water won't drop until late August, about the same time his business drops off following the celebration of Labor Day weekend.

Daggett said the Corps is at the mercy of what nature dishes out. If runoff from the mountains is curtailed and rainfall is localized or minimal, the lake could drop sooner. If not, the lake could stay high into August.

"It's a day-to-day operation," he said. "And if we get some big rainfalls, it will be adjusted."

http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_c9cea182-9959-11e0-a25b-001cc4c002e0.html
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Video: The Great Missouri Flood of 2011 Omaha / Council Bluffs

ploaded by MrRgibson737 on Jun 13, 2011

Aerial view of the Missouri River,overlooking Omaha and Council Bluffs. The flood gates have not been fully opened yet and you can see the damage already. This will be the worst disaster in over a 100 years. This is I-29 in Iowa, between the Mormon Bridge and Crescent, landing at Eppley Airfield in Omaha.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnE3pbxmSaQ&feature=player_embedded#at=20
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
From Another Post

I was looking at the word New Madrid and then read it backwards:

NEW MADRID

DIRDAM WEN

or

WEN DIRDAM

When the dam...breaks?

It was just a thought!
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Video: Missouri River - Flood of Biblical Proportions 6/11/11

ST. LOUIS (KMOX) - An expert on Missouri River reservoirs is sounding a very loud, very urgent warning about the chance of catastrophic flooding this summer.

Bernard Shanks, an adviser to the Resource Renewal Institute, says the Fort Peck Dam and five others along the Missouri are already full with the Army Corps of Engineers releasing record amounts of water to prepare for snow-melt and heavy rain up-river.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrKy_81KBec&feature=player_embedded
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Information From Another Post

I have noticed the last two days, the Corp of Engineers is not sending out tweets like they use to.
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Think about it..the best way to make the dam fail is by using an explosive device(s)of some sort. Clif High has posted an interim report on halfpasthuman.com which alludes to 'explosive noises over water'.

Information From Another Post
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
""The Missouri River basin encompasses a vast region in the central and west-central portion of our country. This river, our nation's longest, collects the melt from Rocky Mountain snowpack and the runoff from our continents' upper plains before joining the Mississippi river above St. Louis some 2,300 miles later. It is a mighty river, and dangerous.

Some sixty years ago, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) began the process of taming the Missouri by constructing a series of six dams. The idea was simple: massive dams at the top moderating flow to the smaller dams below, generating electricity while providing desperately needed control of the river's devastating floods.

The stable flow of water allowed for the construction of the concrete and earthen levees that protect more than 10 million people who reside and work within the river's reach. It allowed millions of acres of floodplain to become useful for farming and development. In fact, these uses were encouraged by our government, which took credit for the resulting economic boom. By nearly all measures, the project was a great success.

But after about thirty years of operation, as the environmentalist movement gained strength throughout the seventies and eighties, the Corps received a great deal of pressure to include some specific environmental concerns into their MWCM (Master Water Control Manual, the "bible" for the operation of the dam system). Preservation of habitat for at-risk bird and fish populations soon became a hot issue among the burgeoning environmental lobby. The pressure to satisfy the demands of these groups grew exponentially as politicians eagerly traded their common sense for "green" political support.

Things turned absurd from there. An idea to restore the nation's rivers to a natural (pre-dam) state swept through the environmental movement and their allies. Adherents enlisted the aid of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), asking for an updated "Biological Opinion" from the FWS that would make ecosystem restoration an "authorized purpose" of the dam system. The Clinton administration threw its support behind the change, officially shifting the priorities of the Missouri River dam system from flood control, facilitation of commercial traffic, and recreation to habitat restoration, wetlands preservation, and culturally sensitive and sustainable biodiversity.

Congress created a committee to advise the Corps on how best to balance these competing priorities. The Missouri River Recovery and Implementation Committee has seventy members. Only four represent interests other than environmentalism. The recommendations of the committee, as one might expect, have been somewhat less than evenhanded.

The Corps began to utilize the dam system to mimic the previous flow cycles of the original river, holding back large amounts of water upstream during the winter and early spring in order to release them rapidly as a "spring pulse." The water flows would then be restricted to facilitate a summer drawdown of stream levels. This new policy was highly disruptive to barge traffic and caused frequent localized flooding, but a multi-year drought masked the full impact of the dangerous risks the Corps was taking.

This year, despite more than double the usual amount of mountain and high plains snowpack (and the ever-present risk of strong spring storms), the true believers in the Corps have persisted in following the revised MWCM, recklessly endangering millions of residents downstream.

Missouri Senator Roy Blunt agrees, calling the management plan "flawed" and "poorly thought out." Sen. Blunt characterized the current flooding as "entirely preventable" and told reporters that he intends to force changes to the plan.

Perhaps tellingly, not everyone feels the same apprehension toward the imminent disaster.

Greg Pavelka, a wildlife biologist with the Corps of Engineers in Yankton, SD, told the Seattle Times that this event will leave the river in a "much more natural state than it has seen in decades," describing the epic flooding as a "prolonged headache for small towns and farmers along its path, but a boon for endangered species." He went on to say, "The former function of the river is being restored in this one-year event. In the short term, it could be detrimental, but in the long term it could be very beneficial."

At the time of this writing, the Corps is scrambling for political cover, repeatedly denying that it had any advance warning of the potential for this catastrophe. The official word is that everything was just fine until unexpectedly heavy spring rains pushed the system past the tipping point.""
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Greg Pavelka, a wildlife biologist with the Corps of Engineers in Yankton, SD, told the Seattle Times that this event will leave the river in a "much more natural state than it has seen in decades," describing the epic flooding as a "prolonged headache for small towns and farmers along its path, but a boon for endangered species." He went on to say, "The former function of the river is being restored in this one-year event. In the short term, it could be detrimental, but in the long term it could be very beneficial."
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Email warned of ‘biblical flood’

FORT PIERRE — In a series of emails sent to a Washington D.C. agency in February, Fort Pierre Public Works Director Brad Lawrence essentially predicted "a flood of biblical proportions" if the U.S. Army Corps of engineers did not start releasing water from the Oahe Dam, the Capital Journal has learned.

In a series of emails sent to Kevin Morley of the American Water Works Association, Lawrence said, "The Corps of Engineers has failed thus far to evacuate enough water from the main stem reservoirs to meet normal runoff conditions. This year’s runoff will be anything but normal. This is compounded by the anticipated flooding downstream."

Chris Mangan | Capital Journal
At least one local official believes scenes like this could have been avoided had water been released earlier from the Oahe Dam as he urged in emails sent as early as February of this year, warning of major flooding.
Advertisement


And in a chillingly accurate summation, Lawrence said in a Feb. 3 document, "The Corps will hold back water to help alleviate the downstream flooding, filling the reservoirs to capacity in the process. Once full, they will pass everything that comes in."

That grim prediction has become reality as the Corps has been forced to release 150,000 cubic feet per second from the reservoir, which is within several inches of the top of the spillway. The result has been millions of dollars in costs to construct levees in Fort Pierre and Pierre, the displacement of dozens of people and severe economic impact to both cities. Water has intruded into parks and neighborhoods and currently threatens millions of dollars of real estate in affluent sections of Fort Pierre.

The Capital Journal obtained Lawrence’s emails pursuant to a South Dakota Freedom of Information request filed with the city of Fort Pierre. The emails (see accompanying box with excerpts of the date and content) were among several sent to Morley, security and preparedness program manager for AWWA, in February to warn of his concerns about potential flooding.

But according to the Army Corps of Engineers no one at the Omaha office, which coordinates activities on the Missouri River system, was ever forwarded those emails.

"We had no correspondence with Fort Pierre during that time that I know of," said Jody Farhat, chief of the Missouri River basin water management office for the USACE.

Even though the Corps may not have been aware of Lawrence’s dire prediction, those emails were forwarded by Morley to every WARN state chair in the nation.

Lawrence, who is the South Dakota WARN chair, said although he did not send that information to the Corps, he finds it "hard to believe that it wouldn’t have gotten passed on to the Corps."

"The info that Brad (Lawrence) shared was meant to let other WARNs know that (Fort Pierre was) looking at a potential flood," said Morley, describing the genesis of the correspondence.

The email trail began with Lawrence’s concerns about the excessive amount of runoff and winter snow pack that would soon be melting.

"In April 2009, the inflow to the Oahe (Dam) was 140,000 cubic feet per second," he said. "That would be a flood of biblical proportions here and downstream" were the Corps forced to pass that incoming water downriver. In fact, the current release rate of 150,000 cfs is the most ever released and will continue until mid-August.

But Farhat said even if the Corps had been aware of Lawrence’s concerns, its models did not predict the event he envisioned. Farhat said the Corps’ studies, even as late as May 1, showed above average snow pack in that last "week or two" of April.

"We were not anticipating these historic (release) levels by any stretch of the imagination until that perfect storm and rainfall we had," said Farhat. On May 20 Farhat said there was an "incredibly large" amount of rainfall over eastern Montana.

"Flows on the Yellowstone River went to record level," said Farhat. "That runoff from rainfall filled up the storage in the reservoir that we had intended to use for the snowmelt."

Lawrence also anticipated in February that the downriver states not directly affected by all the moisture would become affected when the runoff reaches them.

But Farhat maintains that the Corps was not "unduly concerned" about water releases until the May rainfall.

"I understand the whole realm of issues (the Corps must consider), but when you’re number one job is flood control, you need to focus on that," said Lawrence.

Farhat said the Corps monitors snow pack on the plains and in mountains in winter months. They then build on to their model the range of potential runoff and set the releases based on what is needed for the reservoirs of the six dams.

"Flood control was the primary factor for the releases," said Farhat.

Lawrence maintains that when the Omaha District USACE is notified of flaws they are sometimes unresponsive unless the city notifying them has a study to support their information, something that can be prohibitively expensive.

"There are other instances where I have proven the Corps wrong on their hydraulic modeling and it is documented," said Lawrence. "Now that we have (released) much more water than what they predicted . . . they cannot hide from the fact that they were dead wrong."

Levees in Fort Pierre continue to hold but groundwater and city water and utilities will need to continue to be monitored until flooding has subsided.

Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., said on June 2 "I believe there will probably be some kind of hearing with Congress in the future (regarding the Corps)."

Excerpts of emails between Fort Pierre Public Works Director Brad Lawrence and a Washington, D.C. agency warning of flood consequences if water was not released early from the Oahe Dam

• Feb. 3 email from Brad Lawrence to Kevin Morley:

“I anticipate significant flooding from the Missouri River to the East Coast on nearly every significant river. This may be one for the record books.

I am including the Missouri River in that tally at this time. The Corps of Engineers has failed thus far to evacuate enough water from the main stem reservoirs to meet normal runoff conditions. This year’s run off will be anything but normal. This is compounded by the anticipated flooding downstream. The Corps will hold back water to help alleviate the downstream flooding; filling the reservoirs to capacity in the process. Once full, they will pass everything that comes in. In April 2009 the inflow to Oahe was 140,000 cfs. That would be a flood of biblical proportions here and downstream.

I would also anticipate that those states that are down stream and not affected directly by all this moisture will become affected when the runoff reaches them.



I will guarantee that the James River and Big Sioux River in SD will flood. The Red and James in ND along with many tributaries to the Missouri River will flood. Everything in MN including the Mississippi looks like it is primed to flood; especially the Minnesota River.

It looks like this most recent storm went right down the Ohio River Valley. That can’t be good for that system.”

• Feb. 22 email from Kevin Morley to all WARN chairs:

“WARNS in Midwest should be getting ready for Flooding. Any water treatment or wastewater plant along any of these rivers should be ready for flooding…meaning preparing to implement a flood action plan and a recovery plan. Any electrical equipment below the 500 year flood line could be considered at risk and any of it below the 100 year flood line is at greater risk.”

• April 26 email from Brad Lawrence to Kevin Morley:

“At this time, we are on pace to max out the local reservoir. The water content of the mountain snow pack is double what it was last year. That means that high discharges will occur for most of the summer and possibly into the fall season.”

• May 6 email from Brad Lawrence to Kevin Morley:

“If you compare year over year, we are at double the water content for this same time last year in mountain snow pack. That will account for about 1/3 of our total runoff this year and is substantially more than in years past. That is assuming that we get enough warmth this summer to melt it all. We failed to melt all the snow last summer, so it is entirely possible that we will build more year round snow pack, AKA the making of a glacier.”
http://www.capjournal.com/articles/2011/06/14/news/doc4df6d00c78f8c907147522.txt
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Blunt says Congress will challenge Army Corps' Missouri River plan


WASHINGTON • The last overhaul of the Army Corps of Engineers' Missouri River bible of operations concluded in 2004 after 14 years of haggling with participants in the debate complaining they hadn't gotten what they want.

But Sen. Roy Blunt said today that as flooding worsens along the river, he is rounding up support in the basin for a new effort that would emphasize flood control as Army engineers' primary management task.

"I think we're going to have a legislative discussion about the master plan," Blunt, R-Mo., told reporters.

He was speaking after getting a sobering assessment today in Washington from Brig. Gen. John McMahon, commander of corps' Northwest Division, about the extent and duration of the flooding.

Blunt said he was told that the inflow from rain and snowmelt will significantly exceed any recorded since the corps started taking measurements in 1898.

"We're going to be dealing with flooding issues and high water issues along the Missouri until September," Blunt said.

Floodwater has triggered evacuations in the lower third of the river, breached at least a half-dozen levees and overtopped others, assuring major disruptions in Missouri farming this season.

In the St. Louis area, local corps officials have said that serious flooding can be avoided this summer absent persistent heavy rains. The decision to ramp up releases today from Gavins Point Dam, the easternmost of six Missouri dams, beyond flows scheduled just a week ago likely will intensify local planning.

The corps' management has been challenged up and down the river, particuarly decisions on holding water in reservoirs this spring before weather conditions deteriorated.

Corps officials insist that their decisions were in line with its master manual, the document subject to the 14 years of recent scrutiny. The manual prescribes authorized purposes of the river based on legislation from the 1940s and recently has included provisions to assist recovery of federally protected species.

Blunt said he already has spoken to colleagues about pushing for changes, and he offered his version of what's most important.

"I believe that the priority should be, first, flood control, and then navigation and then power generation, water supply, irrigation, wildife, and recreation," he said. "That doesn't mean recreation is not important; it just means that it's the last thing, and flood control is the first thing, and navigation comes right after that."

He added: "I think it's going to require congressional involvement."

Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer, R-St. Elizabeth, offered a similar assessment after meeting Wednesday in Washington with McMahon.

"We are currently asking the corps to juggle too many competing interests. Too much emphasis has been placed on recreation, habitat restoration and compliance with the Endangered Species Act," he said in a statement.

More: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/...cle_8c8e4492-9dc0-11e0-9b2a-001a4bcf6878.html
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Exclusive: Corps Letter Solicits River Property in Midst of Flood, Critics See Ulterior Mo

KMBC 9 News has obtained an Army Corps of Engineer’s letter soliciting “willing buyers” of river side property, in the midst of a devastating flood.

Corps critics are pointing to it as proof the Corps has a motive other than flood control behind the massive water releases. The Corps denies that.

The letter was mailed June 6 from the Kansas City District Corps offices. At the same time, the Corp was starting to substantially raise the water releases upstream.

Citing the 1986 Water Resources Act, he letter states “The Corps of Engineers is currently seeking willing sellers of land along the river”.

That 1980 law authorizes the Corps to buy property to replace wildlife habitats that may have lost from construction, operation and maintenance of the River.

It also mentioned the purchased ground would “allow fish and wildlife habitats to be enhanced for aquatic species such as the pallid sturgeon”.

“This further endorses that they are going to go ahead get the ground they’re flooding, said Holt County farmer Bruce Biermann. He received a copy of the Corps letter.

That is not true”, said the chief of the Kansas City Corp office Emergency operations Jud Knuevean.

“We clearly understand that the time of the letter could be seen as insensitive to folks who are experiencing flooding.”

Knuevean says solicitation letter is a standard part of the Corps’ Missouri River Recovery program. “We have been acquiring land since 1986,” he said. That is when the law was approved.

“It (the solicitation letter) should not have occurred, but it did” Knuevean admitted.

Biermann says the Corps should never send letters like that out. He says the Corps has its main priority misplaced.

“The damns were put along the Missouri River for flood control,” said Biermann. “That seems to have taken a low ranking.

Knuevean says the Corps would never tie the flood control program and the property acquisition project together.

“We’re operating the reservoirs purely for flood relief at this point.”

He continued, “It has nothing to do with buying land to restore the Missouri River ecosytstem.
http://20poundsofheadlines.wordpres...n-midst-of-flood-critics-see-ulterior-motive/
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
More Dangerous Than Nuclear Power: The Floods Caused by Aging Dams [Video]

As the U.S. and China endure record-breaking floods this spring, there is a risk that is being overlooked amidst the inundated towns, evacuations and rising waters. Dams in the U.S. boast an average age of 50 years, and the American Society of Civil Engineers continues to give the nation's dams a D grade overall in terms of maintenance. Will it take the catastrophic collapse of a dam—like the five in the 1970s in the U.S. that killed hundreds—before the infrastructure is repaired?

The nation's more than 80,000 dams have served us well—restraining less-than-epic floods and generating billions of kilowatt-hours of electricity for regional grids. In fact, massive dams across the western U.S., like Grand Coulee in Washington state, still provide the vast majority of "renewable" electricity in the U.S., some 7 percent. At the same time, hydropower can help balance more intermittent renewable resources, such as wind power. For example, water can be held back water to cope with "wind droughts," prolonged periods of little or no wind such as an 11 day wind drought in the Pacific Northwest earlier this year.

But these dams of legend—that helped win World War II as the poster illustrating this post implies—are old. And old dams are in danger of failure—more than 4,000 in the U.S. alone are at high risk of imminent failure, according to the Association of State Dam Safety Officials.

Editor's note: The original broadcast incorrectly implied that the annual U.S. military budget is $60 billion. The actual figure is closer to $685 billion.



On a per kilowatt-hour basis, dams are the most dangerous source of electricity generation, followed by burning coal with its attendant mining accidents and deaths via heavily polluted air. A tsunami flood crippled Fukushima Daiichi in Japan—prompting the meltdown of three nuclear reactors that have, so far, killed no one. A series of dam failures in China in the 1970s killed more than 200,000 people. Similarly, more than 500,000 have been evacuated in central and southern China this month due to flooding and mudslides, whereas about 80,000 have been relocated due to the nuclear plant disaster in Japan.

In fact, the filling the reservoirs behind new big dams in China may have helped trigger the deadly 2008 earthquake in Sichuan Province. As a result, the Chinese government has admitted that its most massive dam—Three Gorges—has "urgent problems," ranging from "geological disaster prevention" to the ongoing relocation of millions of people.

Nevertheless, the world is embarking on a new renaissance of big dam building; just this month Brazil gave final approval to move forward with the massive Belo Monte dam in the Amazon region of Para state on the Xingu River, which will be able to produce more than 11 gigawatts of power. Meanwhile, the world's older dams are in dire need of refurbishment, lest the floods burst their bounds.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=more-dangerous-than-nuclear-power-t-2011-06-17
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
The enormous US dam problem no one is talking about

DUNCAN, OKLA.

The landscape of America, at last count, is dotted with 79,272 large dams. Most of them safely deliver bountiful benefits - trillions of gallons of water for drinking, irrigation, and industrial use, plus flood control, recreation, hydroelectric power, and navigation.

That's the good news.

Here, in my opinion, is the bad news: Disaster lurks in thousands of those dams.

At least 3,500 of America's big dams are unsafe, according to inspection reports filed away in obscure nooks and crannies of government offices across the country. Thousands more dams also are unsafe, the American Society of Civil Engineers concluded this year, but no one knows for certain how many because few states have the funds for even cursory safety inspections.

Thus, every moment of every day, unsafe dams form a vast reservoir of danger throughout America. That's not an overstatement. I'm not a professional engineer, but I've spent nearly two-thirds of my 45-year career in journalism studying unsafe dams. I've done on-the-scene reporting on dam failures that killed 175 people and caused billions of dollars in property damage. I've interviewed scores of victims, dozens of state and federal engineers, inspectors, and officials, and examined records on hundreds of dams.

In my view, the cumulative hazard posed by unsafe dams is huge, but it remains largely unexplored by the media. When a dam fails - and records suggest dozens do each year - the events usually are viewed as local, transitory incidents rather than a symbol of a national problem.

Hurricane Katrina underscored the peril of depending on man-made structures for protection against disaster. Failure of the New Orleans' levee system during the storm this year contributed to prolonged flooding and 1,300 deaths.

Months later, as scenes of misery and dislocation lingered in the public mind, President Bush urgently asked Congress to approve $3 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers to begin rebuilding New Orleans' battered levees. The House of Representatives included that amount in a $29 billion hurricane recovery assistance package it passed three days later.

In concept and construction, levees are close cousins of dams. But while politicians flocked to support repair of New Orleans' levees, they've virtually ignored a proposed Dam Rehabilitation and Repair Act which has languished for nearly a year in a House subcommittee. The proposal would authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to disperse $350 million over four years to help states repair unsafe dams. Chances of Congress enacting such a repair program anytime soon are slim.

The $350 million program would be a down payment of less than 10 percent toward the estimated $36.2 billion total cost of repairing America's unsafe dams. It also is approximately one-eighth of the amount the president is seeking for repair of the New Orleans' levees.

This is not to suggest that the New Orleans' levees go unrepaired. But from New England to Hawaii more and more aging dams are experiencing problems, with little public awareness. A few large and small examples:

• Taunton, Mass., got national attention in October when a 173-year-old, 12-foot-tall wooden dam above its business district began to buckle. Stores and schools were closed for a week and townspeople headed for higher ground. The crisis eased when the water level behind the dam was lowered. The federal government is now paying 75 percent of the $189,410 cost of tearing down Whittenton Mills Dam and replacing it with a new one.

• In the placid Schoharie River Valley of upstate New York, a volunteer group calling itself Dam Concerned Citizens was formed last month to press for emergency repairs to 182-foot-tall Gilboa Dam, built 80 years ago to supply drinking water to New York City. The dam has been leaking for years. Now citizens have established their own website which distributes emergency notification plans and publicizes preselected evacuation routes for use should the dam fail (www.gilboadaminfo.com).

• Residents of Denver, Colo., population 2 million plus, were warned last month by the Corps of Engineers that serious safety problems have been detected at Cherry Creek Dam, a 141-foot-tall earthen structure. The dam was built 55 years ago on what was then windswept pastureland 10 miles south of Denver. Now the dam looms above Interstate 225, a cluster of office parks and swank homes, a nationally known golf course, and several schools.

Bruce Tschantz, professor emeritus at the University of Tennessee who 25 years ago helped establish the first Office of Dam Safety in the then-nascent FEMA, reached back into classical mythology to fetch a phrase - "the sword of Damocles" - to express his concern about the dangers posed by deficient dams perched above developed areas. (Damocles was a courtier at the court of Dionysius I in the 4th century BC. He was so gushing in his praise of the power and happiness of Dionysius that the tyrant, to illustrate the precariousness of rank and power, gave a banquet and had a sword suspended above the head of Damocles by a single hair.)

"We know what the problems are, we know where they are, and we know how to fix them," Dr. Tschantz said in a telephone interview. It's that next step - actually getting the money to fix them - where we're stalled."

Tschantz doesn't point fingers of blame. But it's clear to me that Congress and several presidents, including the current occupant of the White House, share culpability on the national level, and that too many state and local officials have grown weary of trying to find sources of financing to make dams safer.

Jimmy Carter was the last president to display serious and sustained interest in the issue. He had been in office less than a year when, in the early morning darkness of a Sunday in November 1977, a never-inspected dam in the mountains of his home state of Georgia collapsed and sent a wall of water crashing down upon the campus of Toccoa Falls Bible College - a campus he had visited several times.

The Kelly Barnes Dam on Toccoa Creek dated back to 1899, when a rock-and- timber structure was built across a fast-flowing mountain stream to impound water for a small hydroelectric plant. Later, Toccoa Falls Bible Institute chose the valley below as the site for its campus, took over the power plant and, in 1937, decided to construct an earthen embankment over the original dam, eventually raising the structure's height to 42 feet.

Twenty years later, in 1957, the school abandoned the power plant. For the next two decades, the dam was neglected, visited only by an occasional fisherman or hiker. Pine trees grew to maturity on its downstream slope, sending roots deep into the dam's core. Portions of the steep embankment vanished in a landslide, but there were no repairs, even though water seeped almost continuously from the base of the dam. Finally, the weakened 78-year-old dam collapsed during a rainy night in Georgia.

In the valley below, Eldon Elsberry and two friends were on patrol in the campus fire department's Jeep. When the wall of water hit, it overturned the vehicle. "One minute the water [in the creek] was inches deep, and the next I was swimming for my life," Mr. Elsberry said. "I saw the bank and made for it." He turned and saw one of his friends struggling in the water. "I reached for his hand. He went by so fast I couldn't touch him."

Experts later calculated that the water released by the dam's collapse weighed approximately the same as 7,500 locomotives. As the water crashed across the campus, it destroyed a dormitory and crushed a cluster of mobile homes where married students lived.

Later, in the mud and tangled debris, 39 bodies were found. Twenty were children. College officials said they never hired a private consulting engineer because they had no idea it had safety problems. The state of Georgia never inspected the dam because, at the time, there was no state law requiring such inspections. Few other states had dam safety laws then, either. Pennsylvania was one of the exceptions. Its tough law was spurred by memories of the 1889 collapse of South Fork Dam above Johnstown that killed 2,209 people. Yet even with the strong state law requiring regular safety inspections, another 55 people in the same community died in July 1977 after the failure of Laurel Run Dam, just a few miles from where South Fork Dam triggered the disaster 88 years earlier.

While all states except Alabama now have laws or regulations establishing dam safety programs, enforcement is spotty, largely because of the paucity of inspectors. In Texas, for example, there are only six state employees to inspect nearly 7,500 dams. One Texas official noted that with the current staff level "some dams would not be examined for three centuries."

Let's do the math. Two of my teenaged grandchildren live in Texas. If we count 30 years for each generation, that means all the dams in Texas will be inspected by the time my grandchildren's great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren ring in a new year in 2306. Reassuring, isn't it?

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0103/p09s01-coop.html
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Updated: Look Who’s Buying Up Flood Ravaged Farm Land

Two HUGE intel leads in my email box this morning from way-back contacts that I’ve had for years, that are actually somewhat connected concepts.

1. File this one under “Now It All Makes Sense”. A Missouri farming and ranching contact just got off a conference call wherein he was informed that the federal government is sending out letters to all of the flooded out farmers in the Missouri River flood plain and bottoms notifying them that the Army Corps of Engineers will offer to BUY THEIR LAND.

Intentionally flood massive acreage of highly productive farmground. Destroy people’s communities and homes. Catch them while they are desperate and afraid and then swoop in and buy the ground cheap. Those evil sons of bitches.

2. Speaking of evil sons of bitches, George Soros appears to be “investing” in farmground through the same puppet company that he used to get into the grain elevator and fertilizer business. The company is called Ospraie Capital Management and is buying up farmground in a joint venture with Teays River Investments as a partner. Here is that announcement:

Click Here

Okay. Here’s the connection. This Ospraie outfit was a hedge fund specializing in commodities that was started and run by some cocky child who didn’t know how to trade bear markets and got his butt kicked into next week in the grain market of 2008. He also lost a fortune trying to trade RARE EARTH METALS. In fact, it was so bad that he had to shut his fund down because he had promised his investors that he would give them all of their investment money back if the fund lost more than 30% in one year. Whoopsie.

But it appears that Soros swooped in and saved the day because this Ospraie is the “co-investor” with Soros that bought the remnants of ConAgra’s trading operation and renamed it . . . Gavilon. In the industry, it is widely acknowledged that Ospraie IS Soros. That three-page article citation is here, copy and paste the URL into your address bar:

http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/12/news/companies/ospraie_demos.fortune/index.htm

As you probably remember, Gavilon just recently bought both DeBruce Grain out of Kansas City and the biggest grain elevator company in the Pacific Northwest, thus making Soros (who is the money behind Gavilon through both his own Soros Fund Management AND his de facto control of Ospraie) the third-largest grain company in the U.S. with 280 million bushels of storage capacity, behind only Archer Daniels Midland (542 million bushels storage capacity) and Cargill (344 million bushels storage capacity). That citation is here:

http://www.world-grain.com/News/News Home/Features/2010/12/A powerful signal.aspx?p=1

Bottom line: Soros, through Ospraie, is buying up farmground. Please also note that the hotlink citation above is dated June 26, 2009. My contact says this has been going on for two years – and also remember what I told you about farmground prices inflating wildly, especially in Illinois. I have personally confirmed farmground in Illinois selling for $13,000 per acre within the last month, whereas that same kind of ground in Illinois was going for $5500 per acre the day Obama was inaugurated.

Spread the word.

***

Two days ago, Ann posted the following on her website.

Missouri Basin Flooding: 100% Intentional
Posted by Ann Barnhardt – June 22, AD 2011 10:07 AM MST

The Army Corps of Engineers in collusion with Marxist-Environmentalists have engineered a flood scenario that will, is, and already has killed people and will result in property damage in the multi-multi billions of dollars. And it is all intentional.

Read “The Purposeful Flooding of America’s Heartland” HERE at AmericanThinker.com

The excuse is saving the wetland habitat of the blue-butted water auk or some taurusfimus like that.

Two points:

1. I’ll say what no one else will about the Army Corps of Engineers: that’s where all the C- state school engineering students end up. Let that reality compound over 30-40 years and you would be FAR better off letting Terry down at the local machining shop or Ricky over t’ the diesel garage run the Missouri River dam system.

TERRY AND RICKY HAVE COMMON SENSE.
TERRY AND RICKY HAVE PRACTICAL SKILL, KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY.
TERRY AND RICKY ARE DECENT HUMAN BEINGS WHO WOULD NEVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ALLOW PEOPLE TO BE KILLED AND DISPLACED.
TERRY AND RICKY HATE COMMUNISTS.

2. None of this is ever going to stop until We The People start arresting these people, trying them for treason, and then putting them in prison for the rest of their lives. This will never, ever stop unless there are massive, massive personal consequences for these people.

Gulag Notes from Arlen

Maybe we could try something just a little risky. Maybe we can mention some subjects which have, or could have something to do with this, then ask for verification or further information. That is risky because Gulag Bound is not a forum where people are used to posting. But it’s not like there’s much to risk. Perhaps you would like to look for such information and post it in comments below, whether the looking is on the ‘net or elsewhere.

1. I’ve been told that during the war in Vietnam, the U.S. caused rains to build up over the Mekong River, in order to make it difficult for Viet Cong to traverse the delta east into South Vietnamese territory. Would you like to look for information about this, or other instances of intentionally induced or increases of rain over a region?

2. It has been reported that numerous kinds of particulate matter has been found in rain gauges, including those along the Mississippi or Missouri Rivers. Can you find the most pertinent and valid information about that? And yes, that could include information about contrails and chemtrails.

3. Has the U.S. government been trying to secure land in Louisiana or elsewhere along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, after the Deepwater Horizon crude oil (and Corexit) catastrophe. What knowledge of this may be assembled?

I’m sure there are other pertinent questions. Maybe I’ll post a new entry in GulagBound.com strictly for gathering this and related information. Some time tomorrow, I should be able to consider that more fully and follow through.

By the way, I just saw the weather forecast tonight. It calls for severe storms in the Missouri and Mississippi River Valleys. Someone just called all this “a five hundred year event.” Whether he was referring to just the new Missouri River rains, or including this Spring’s Mississippi River deluges, he did not say.
http://gulagbound.com/17158/look-whos-buying-up-flood-ravaged-farm-land/
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
Video: They are flooding us on purpose! MUST WATCH!

The purposeful flooding of middle America appears to be planned, but regardless there are 10 million people's lives and livelihood are at stake.
And there is a media blackout on this? UNBELIEVABLE! Another must see vid with more links is who is buying up the flooded farmland!

More: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdrNwjt8LNI
 

medic38572

TB Fanatic
Sleeping Cobra thanks for all the info posted and the time it took. I hope your getting a good nap this morning!
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
The Fort Peck Incident

A terrorist scenario:

The two men sit patiently in the small grove of trees, quietly assembling their gear. Few words are spoken between the two of them. Weighted backpacks with connecting wires are placed in a motorized raft, followed by two coolers and fishing rods. Both are dressed as non-descript fishermen to blend in with the Montana population.

Shortly before sunset the two slide their boat into the waters along the east side of the famous Fort Peck dam near the town of Fort Peck, Montana. The dam, located near the headwaters of the Missouri River on the vast prairies of eastern Montana, has water extending as far as the eyes can see. It is one of the worlds largest rolled earth dams. The picture of this man-made creation is a spectacular sight.

Entering the waters slowly, checking buoyancy and weight distribution, the two start the low power motor on the raft and begin to make their way along the 10-mile stretch towards the spillway. After the 30-minute ride, the throttle is slowed to a bare minimum, as they move in near silence along the dam spillway.

Checking position markers with a flashlight, the phony fishermen close in on marker “G”, a point just east of the spillway on the giant earth berm used to contain the water.

On locating the marker, a series of seven interconnected backpacks are lowered into the water. Each backpack, strategically separated along a common tether, forming a well-conceived plan for disaster. Special knots on the lowering rope enable the terrorists to gauge the depth of the water. Once the desired depth is achieved, the raft is maneuvered so the backpacks come to rest along the sloping earthen fill. The end of the rope is tied to a grappling hook, which is hand pressed into the side of the dam to anchor the explosives into place. The start button on the waterproof timer is depressed, and the world’s single most destructive terrorist act has begun!

The date and time has been carefully chosen. Spring runoff has pushed the dam capacity to near record levels and the 120 minute timer allows plenty of time for the two men to pack all their belonging and disappear before the prescribed detonation time of midnight.

The Fort Peck dam, built in 1943, has served for decades as a source of hydroelectric power, potable water, and seemingly limitless recreation. This sleeping giant, lying unnoticed among the not-too-scenic eastern plains of Montana, is about to be awakened.

Overcast skies made the evening darker than normal, with only a few perimeter lights casting a dotted line along the dam and hydroelectric plant.

Two minutes past midnight, a blast of unmeasurable force, paints a glowing fireball along the “G” marker, the weakest point in the dam’s design. The underwater explosion forces a separation between the earth and water, with water momentarily retreating around an expanding “blast bubble” and then rushing back towards a fractured seam, blasting a massive hole in the earthen wall. Slowly the layers of earth are forced out of the way as a relentless avalanche of water and silt carves an ever-widening chasm in the wall of the dam. And in a seemingly never ending torrent, the dam’s 23 billion cubic meters of water begins to barrel through the Missouri river valley, quickly overloading its capacity.

Within minutes the first word of the dam break begins to reach the media and a frantic scramble ensues as media and emergency rescue teams begin to alert everyone living downstream. Since most people are asleep, the job of alerting people becomes immensely more complicated. Telephones banks are hastily assembled with volunteers, farmers, and housewives calling to wake up every person they can find a number for. Only a few small towns lie within the first two hundred miles downstream – Frazer, Oswego, Wolf Point, Poplar, Brockton and Culbertson. These towns are quickly and totally destroyed and the death toll begins to mount.

Crossing the North Dakota border, the Fort Peck waters combine with the raging waters of the Yellowstone River to wipe out the towns of Buford, Trenton, and Williston.

In approximately four hours, the wall of water collides with the headwaters of Lake Sakakawea formed by Garrison Dam. Garrison Dam, located 70 miles north of Bismarck, North Dakota, is one on the largest dams in the U.S. But its 30 billion cubic meter capacity is suddenly no match to contain the destructive force of Fort Peck’s 23 billion cubic meters of water. And the Garrison dam also crumbles, this time destroying Garrison’s major hydroelectric power plant. The hydroelectric plant in Fort Peck survives, but by now has also stopped because it has run out of water.

The destructive water mass starts moving towards the more populated areas. The first significant city in its sights is Bismarck, North Dakota’s state capital, with a population base of about 100,000 people. Near daylight, panic hits the streets of Bismarck with residents frantically trying to grab belongings, locate friends and family members, and head for higher ground. Emergency vehicles with sirens and PA systems patrol the streets to wake and alert all residents. Keep in mind that the power has been cut off roughly one hour before the water hits. Most forms of communication have been incapacitated.

As the water mass hits the city, it mercilessly rips a path of death and destruction. The first media coverage of the destruction in Bismarck in the daylight hours signals an impending doom for all of the cities downstream. And suddenly the whole nation begins to panic.

Approximately four hours after the Garrison dam burst, the wall of destruction hits the waters of the Lake Oahe formed by the Oahe dam in Pierre, South Dakota. The Oahe dam holds 29 billion cubic meters of water, and is instantly crushed under the massive flood.

At this point, three of the largest dams in the country have been crushed, and the cumulative water mass now totals over 100 billion cubic meters of water, not counting the millions of tons of dirt and debris stirred up as the raging water carves an ever widening channel through the river valley. A second state capital, Pierre, South Dakota is crushed. And another major hydroelectric plant is destroyed.

As the water proceeds, three more dams and hydroelectric plants in South Dakota, Big Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavins Point, are sequentially destroyed causing blackouts in major sections of the Midwest.

Approximately 15 hours after the dam burst in Fort Peck the raging waters carve through another significant city – Sioux City, Iowa, with about 100,000 people. And about two hours later it collides with the first major city – Omaha, Nebraska with a metro population exceeding 800,000 people.

The water mass is now so large that all tributary channels back up for many miles creating far-reaching fingers of destruction. Millions of acres of land becomes flooded with water, soon receding as the water continuously seeks room for its bulging capacity.

Shortly before the end of the first day, the waters reach Kansas City, with a metro area population exceeding one million people.

Media reports for day one estimate the death toll between 25,000 and 50,000 people. Between 2 and 3 million people are now homeless with no working water supply, very little food to eat, no telephone, no power or lights. Thousands of miles of roads have been destroyed, and all train and car bridges on the Missouri River have been destroyed. And the relief effort is slow and sparse because there are just too many people needing help. Many hospitals have been destroyed and the surrounding hospitals have been flooded to over capacity.

As day two arrives the raging waters bear down on the city of St. Louis with its million plus population. St. Louis is very significant because this is where the Missouri River and Mississippi River join together. At this point the normally heavy Mississippi River flow is coupled with the water wall on the Missouri to form an even more massive torrent of death and destruction as it proceeds through a very populated Mississippi River valley.

With more that adequate lead time for people to get out of harms way, fatalities are happening more in the outlying areas, and more for reasons of panic than from being in harms way.

The destruction continues on into Memphis, Tennessee, through Arkansas, Mississippi, and on into Louisiana destroying both Baton Rouge, the third state capital, and New Orleans. The water mass hitting New Orleans is roughly half the size of Lake Michigan.

In just a day and a half a massive trail of destruction over three thousand miles long has been ripped through the center of the United States. The country has literally been cut in half with no ground transportation between the two halves. Nearly 15 million people are now homeless and 250,000 people are missing and presumed dead. Major power plants have been destroyed, and restoring power to the whole country will be a long time in coming.

With this single act of destruction, nearly every person on the face of the earth is somehow affected. Five federal reserve banks have been destroyed. Thousands of major companies have been destroyed. The stock market, domestic and international, is thrown into total turmoil. Most insurance companies simply fold up because the losses are too great. Food supply systems, water supply systems, sewer systems, and many other things we take for granted now take years to repair.

Suddenly, few people care whether or not they are able to connect with Internet; they are more concerned about the survival of their family and friends. People are no longer concerned about going to the gourmet steak house in town; they’re more concerned about where their next meal is coming from and how to feed their family. People are less concerned about investing their money than to see if they have any left. Suddenly all motivations have changed.

The scenario I have just presented was my own creation. Many of the facts have been purposely distorted to prevent anyone from trying this. People at the Corp of Engineers have told me it’s not possible. It may or may not be possible. I have presented this simply to show a sobering example of how everything we know could change over night.

How durable is our lifestyle? How durable is the network of systems that we use to make everything work? Is there another wildcard event that may be equally as destructive?

We live a very fragile existence. It is very presumptuous for us to think that our present strides in technology are going to continually keep ratcheting upwards. It is very presumptuous for us to think that the next generation will have it better than we do. It is presumptuous to think that we will even live in a democracy as a free nation. All of this could change.

As we make future decisions, it is important for us to think about how stable our technology is…how stable our society is…. how stable our future is. I think too often we become insulated from the less fortunate populations in the world, too insulated from the real dangers, too insulated from the random factors that we have no control over.

The Aztec and Inca societies included sophisticated systems for water, transportation, and food. Both were destroyed in wars. The ancient Greeks developed the sciences of physics, mathematics, and astronomy. Today we can walk through the ruins of their temples.

As we plan for our future, let us be mindful of the past. Let us plan for our work to be durable, to survive the challenges of time, changing attitudes, and changing personnel. Let us think long-term not short term.

By Futurist Thomas Frey

NOTE: I wrote this scenario on June 6, 1998, over three years before the World Trade Center Bombing.

One government official told me that this scenario has been routed through all levels of government. After 911, I was real nervous about having the article posted online, but I was told it would actually be better to have it in the open because the terrorist have already considered it, and keeping it in the open will make us better prepared and less likely to happen.

The Fort Peck Dam will be nearly impossible to destroy and the dams downstream will be able to contain the water even if something happens. But there are many other easier targets, so we always need to consider the extreme possibilities.
http://www.futuristspeaker.com/2008/07/the-fort-peck-incident/
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
From Another Post

The Wivenhoe damn in Brisbane Austraiia was left at dangerously high levels in the months leading upto the "great biblical floods" of Brisbane last year.

The operators of the damn were found to be resposibile for the releases that caused inland tsunamis through several townships and the flooding of thousands of homes around the brisbane area. The damn was kept above critical limits leading upto the wettest part of the year. And despite several warnings from the towns surrounding. Nothing was done to lower the dam levels.

The Queensland government initiated an internal enquiry into the floods. Nothing was done. Nobody was punished.

The Australian Government has since used natural disasters to support her agenda for a carbon tax.

Which as far as I am concerned is part of the NWO/USA agenda. Obama has also been working on putting a price on carbon. We arent being given the chance to vote over this tax. But once Australia has this Tax my guess it will be implemented in the US and Europe also.

Also dont forget the boost to the flailing building industry getting to rebuild all those homes and damaged infrastructure.

The premier of Queensland Anna Bligh also saved her falling popularity rating with her response to the flooding.

So lookout for yourselves and take the necessary precautions to moniter the run off's and rainfall in the area.

And also during the intense week of rain leading upto the brisbane floods I noticed the cracked cloudy sky that seemed to always occur before these so called enviro disasters. The clouds would have a raindbow shine to them. And the sky would look like it has been charged. I also predicted zealand earthquake using these diffrerent effeects to my girlfriend and work colleauges. I usually found 5-6 days after these sky patterns there would be a major flooding/earthquake event.

Again this is all my own opinion. I feel that Australia has become the testing ground for pre US policies. We are also in the throws of a national broadband network being installed that will wipe its uranus with our bill of rights.


I believe the Brisbane floods were deliberate. I believe Fort Peck will be deliberatly disabled. The stage is set.

.... they might release amounts that cause a desired amount flooding and damage and loss of life just like in aussie and say the reason for doing it was to stop a major fail of the dam wall. A dam is a powerful tool in the wrong hands.
 

Sleeping Cobra

TB Fanatic
From A Poster:

This thread caught my eye, and as I read it, the title was misleading. It made it seem as crazy as a typical thread that may as well have had "PROOF:" ahead of the main phrase. I was pretty wrong. This is important, I think.

Also, not that I'm too much a believer in prophetic dreams, but the material really caught my eye because, as I woke up from a roughly 11-hour sleep (I NEVER get those these days) I very distinctly saw the image of a gigantic dam with cracks in it. The only words that came to my mind were "dam" and "stress fractures" and the immediate foreboding that would accompany any such thing like that. I normally have great experiences with my dreams, I'm able to dream lucidly almost on command, etc, but this feeling was somehow 'imposed' upon me.

I'd love to dismiss it, but with this thread, it really makes me wonder.

Just thought I'd share.
 

Adino

paradigm shaper
thanks for all the info SC.

the more I ponder the totality of what is going on with the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers the more I see Agenda 21 finger and foot prints.

the Army Corp of Eng and Soros offering to buy up flooded land for cheap smells worse than 2 week old bad fish.
 

OddOne

< Yes, I do look like that.
All this flooding and the dispersion of flood waters into farmland has me wondering what the country will do with a large swath of its bread-basket agri land unusable for the next year or so. And if that water ends up radioactive, turn that "year or so" into "few to several decades." Seems to me that flooding out so much farmland may be a case of taking a drastic measure to lessen a bad short-term problem at the risk of making a worse long-term problem.
 

jehu

Mapper of Landmarks
Snoozin Snake (Sleeping Cobra) ;),

THank you for your update's and heads-UP.

Things ain't getting easier in the near future....
This is the weather forecast for MT area...
http://forecast.weather.gov/hazards/?wfo=ggw

Also this little nugget....

000
FLUS45 KGGW 270914
HWOGGW

HAZARDOUS WEATHER OUTLOOK
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE GLASGOW MT
314 AM MDT MON JUN 27 2011

MTZ016>027-059>062-281000-
CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST PHILLIPS-CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN VALLEY-
DANIELS-SHERIDAN-WESTERN ROOSEVELT-PETROLEUM-GARFIELD-MCCONE-
RICHLAND-DAWSON-PRAIRIE-WIBAUX-NORTHERN PHILLIPS-
SOUTHWEST PHILLIPS-NORTHERN VALLEY-EASTERN ROOSEVELT-
314 AM MDT MON JUN 27 2011

THIS HAZARDOUS WEATHER OUTLOOK IS FOR PORTIONS OF NORTHEAST
MONTANA.

.DAY ONE...TODAY AND TONIGHT

FLOOD WARNINGS CONTINUE FOR THE MILK RIVER IN VALLEY COUNTY AT
GLASGOW AND NASHUA...AND ALONG THE MISSOURI RIVER IN ROOSEVELT
COUNTY. A FLOOD WARNING ALSO CONTINUES FOR THE MUSSELSHELL RIVER
ALONG THE PETROLEUM AND GARFIELD COUNTY BORDER.

.DAYS TWO THROUGH SEVEN...TUESDAY THROUGH SUNDAY

A DRAMATIC AND RAPID WARMING IN TEMPERATURES THROUGH MID WEEK IS
EXPECTED WITH HIGHS IN THE 90S BY WEDNESDAY AND A 100 POSSIBLE
ALONG THE YELLOWSTONE VALLEY.
THIS MAY CAUSE UNEXPECTED HEAT
STRESS TO BOTH PEOPLE AND ANIMALS WHICH HAVE BEEN USED TO A VERY
MILD SUMMER THUS FAR.

.SPOTTER INFORMATION STATEMENT...

WEATHER SPOTTERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO REPORT SIGNIFICANT WEATHER
CONDITIONS ACCORDING TO STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES.


Wonder what affect this will have on the unprecedented snow-pack?
 

PCViking

Lutefisk Survivor
At Fort Peck Dam, i can not find how much water they are releasing. Any help would be appreciated.


Fort peck is currently releasing (Jun 27) 60200 cfs. About the same as it has been for the last couple of weeks. As I posted above, the lake level is dropping--there is more water exiting the reservoir than is coming in.
 

awakeaware

Inactive
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8JqACkhKM4

Raw video by AP ... 3hr old... no denying facts... too much water is the issue...

:vik:

Thank you! I heard there was a video out there, but it had been taken down on some MSM sites.

There is the one other video out about the guy saying there are cracks in the Gavins Point Dam and that the corp of engineers may blow it. Don't know how real that is, but if it goes this week, then we will know there was something to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saMhOPrGbjg

Now besides all of this - with the nuclear plants - the out of control fire is 3 1/2 miles from Los Alamos where there are 30000 drums of plutonium above ground.

I had emailed out the information and a friend of mine is a nuclear scientist. He has been out to Los Alamos before. He emailed back saying that "Yes" there are drums that will be there, he does not know how many. He is very much against nuclear power now.

All the lies and constant cover up is sickening by the government in all that is happening.
 

LucyT

Senior Member
OMAHA, Neb. (KTIV) -

Rumors of cracks in Gavin's Point have run rampant for weeks. Again and again, officials have said the dam is functioning properly.

Now, someone's started spreading a new rumor, that the feds plan to detonate explosives at the dam to release the water pressure. Authorities want to set the record straight.

"We're not streaming explosives on the dam and the dam isn't cracking. It's performing as designed. Whether it's a joke, a hoax, that's what the internet allows," said Colonel Bob Ruch.

An Army Corps spokesman warns there could be consequences for those putting out this kind of false information.
http://www.ktiv.com/story/14979661/corps-concerned-over-gavins-point-rumor
 

ceeblue

Veteran Member
Horse hockey. There have been quite a few national reports. Reuters has reported on this recently. ABC has reported that the electricity is cut off due to the levee breach. The NY Times has reported. Some "total and complete" news blackout.

Hey, thank you. I was too lazy to go look, knowing stories would be all over the place if it was true and invisible if it weren't.

Whenever I see a story here that is purported to be ignored by MSM, then I go do a simple Google News search, stories are piled up high.

WTH is considered MSM here?

Good grief. If Deseret News isn't MSM, what is?

I don't understand looking around Youtube for news or believing anything with a Russian tagline.
 
Top