ALERT UK: King Charles has cancer/Update; has Bell's Palsy

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
I'll happily take a bet that Harry and Wills start working through their differences quite literally for "The Good of Britania and The Firm".

Anne may have to knock some heads together to get this to happen.....and you can bet SHE has the ability.


Something on the order of "DAMMIT children, this has gone on long enough!! Don't make me lock you two in a room and slide rations under the door!"
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Either way, I suspect given his age, his cancer diagnosis, etc., announcing it was probably smart on their part... cause don't they do dry runs for the eventual demise of the king/queen??? Doing so now, given how old his mom and grandmother lived to be would probably cause a lot of rumors and raise a lot of suspicions.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
William, Anne, and Camilla were already performing some Royal Duties. There are photos of William knighting people, like Charles, from when he was Prince.

What has yet to happen, but will if the situation worsens, is having any of them appointed to a position where they can perform The Monarch's constitutional duties, such as opening Parliament, appointing the Prime Minister, or the daily Red Box paperwork. Several family members would qualify for this appointment (I think it is called A Minister of State, but I'm not sure): Camilla, Anne, William, and I believe Edward (the youngest brother). Neither Andrew nor Harry qualifies at this point.

One clue that this is serious (no matter what they say) is that it was just announced that the King's weekly meetings with the Prime Minister will be held on the phone (which is unheard of). So, my guess is Charles is having chemo or another treatment that would lower his immune system. But that's just a guess.
 

Dash

Veteran Member
William, Anne, and Camilla were already performing some Royal Duties. There are photos of William knighting people, like Charles, from when he was Prince.

What has yet to happen, but will if the situation worsens, is having any of them appointed to a position where they can perform The Monarch's constitutional duties, such as opening Parliament, appointing the Prime Minister, or the daily Red Box paperwork. Several family members would qualify for this appointment (I think it is called A Minister of State, but I'm not sure): Camilla, Anne, William, and I believe Edward (the youngest brother). Neither Andrew nor Harry qualifies at this point.

One clue that this is serious (no matter what they say) is that it was just announced that the King's weekly meetings with the Prime Minister will be held on the phone (which is unheard of). So, my guess is Charles is having chemo or another treatment that would lower his immune system. But that's just a guess.
The working Royals all do official work. Mostly through patronages and the like. William & Anne have also done investitures.

Counsellors of State can stand in for the King officially. They can carry out duties such as attending Privy Council meetings, signing routine documents and receiving the credentials of new ambassadors to the United Kingdom. Counsellors were routinely called upon when Queen Elizabeth was traveling abroad.

Traditionally the Counsellors have been the monarch’s spouse and the next four people in the line of succession over the age of 21. As of last Fall, Princess Anne & Prince Edward have been made Counsellors and it has been stated that only working royals would be able to act in this capacity. So even though Prince Harry, Princess Beatrice & Prince Andrew are Counsellors under the law, they will never be called upon.

TLDR - as it stands right now Queen Camilla, Prince William, Princess Anne & Prince Edward could each be called upon to stand in for the King if necessary.

Worst case Prince William would be appointed Regent.
 
Last edited:

TBonz

Veteran Member
Again, it was said, "caught early." And Harry flew back to the States today. So that argues against serious.

Even so, as far as I'm concerned, *any* cancer is serious.
 

Sammy55

Veteran Member
Harry really raised his carbon footprint with the airflight for a 45 minute visit with his father. :p Why did he even bother? For just 45 minutes? I'd like to know if he only set aside 45 minutes or if his father did? Or maybe King Charles wasn't strong enough for a visit longer than that. Charles left and went to Sandringham (to recover after treatment) almost right after Harry left.

Things are still not good in their relationships if Harry chose to stay in a hotel instead of one of the royal residences. He was offered a place to stay amongst family, but he chose a hotel. He must still be whining.
 

energy_wave

Has No Life - Lives on TB
How come we never had a heads up on any of the other royal family members illnesses? Maybe this has come out to let the masses know a new young king is coming to power soon, so it won't be a shock when it happens. They'll come out in stages to adjust the public.
 

rafter

Since 1999
How come we never had a heads up on any of the other royal family members illnesses? Maybe this has come out to let the masses know a new young king is coming to power soon, so it won't be a shock when it happens. They'll come out in stages to adjust the public.
They have always kept it on the hush and hush. This tells me whatever kind Charles has is pretty progressive with not much time left to live. Thus the announcement to get the country ready for a change again.
 

TBonz

Veteran Member
Google is your friend, people.


I happen to watch the BBC news quite a bit, so I heard it there, but this was the first thing that came up when I put it "Sunak" and "They caught it early."

Now if you don't believe the Prime Minister of the UK, who was no doubt briefed in full, nothing I can say.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Which means They Caught It Early, is the official story. But we don't know what type it is, and some cancers can progress rapidly, and others tend to take their time about it.

Oh, and I gather the Queen did Zoom meetings with the Prime Minister during COVID, which makes sense. So, there is a president for doing so. It has been mentioned in a couple of places that she had a form of blood cancer by the end of things, but I suspect at her age she opted for avoiding any extensive treatment; especially if it would have made her feel even sicker and probably had a low chance of doing much good. Since she met with both the out-going and incoming Prime Ministers within three days of her death, I'm guessing she felt frail but was coping fairly well (at least mentally) until the end.
 

SlipperySlope

Veteran Member
I don't really have a side in the royal drama. My family is also very dysfunctional. I do feel a bit sorry for Harry though. He dropped everything on a moments notice and all Charles gave him was less than an hour of a visit.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Could have a Turbo Cancer. New term after the vac that takes you in a few weeks.
Which makes me wonder. Instances of fast acting cancers have shot up since people have gotten the Covid vax, which somehow targets the immune system response to cancer. Before that the only fast acting cancers observed seemed to be "awfully convenient" cases, where someone the government didn't like would 'conveniently" come down with a fatal, fast acting cancer.

Almost as if there was some sort of assassination weapon used to give them the cancer. Hence rumors and "crazy talk" about CIA cancer guns. But what if there is some truth to that and that mechanism got included in the Covid shots given to certain people? Or if the vax contains a diluted dose of the turbo cancer weapon used by the CIA/KGB/MI-6/whoever before Covid?
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
This stuff about constantly asking if someone was vaxxed or not is getting tiresome again. It is showing up on every thread. Drop it. Stop it. Pick another topic.

At this point it really doesn’t matter if people were vaxxed or not. There is a full spectrum assault on the immune systems of people today and we are being attacked from many angles. People are on all sorts of meds that attrit or change the immune response. There are environmental toxins from water, air and frankenfoods. Speaking of foods people don’t get the nutrition they need to mount a robust immune response even if they avoid the processed foods and chemicals put into them. Even if you eat ‘organic’ most soils are depleated of trace minerals and then add to the mix the stress they are under and lack of sleep as well as exercise.

Regardless of vaccination status a lot of this stuff happening today might well have nothing to do with it. If King Charles and other wealthy people can get cancers it can happen to anyone. It behooves us all to be proactive with our health and not to take it for granted. If we are not educated as to what to do and then actually do it then sooner or later we are likely to end up in the same boat.
 

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________
:dhr:

Last warning on the vax crap. From here on out, if i see it, it is going to get deleted. After that I’ll start bumping people from threads. Beyond that? Threads themselves are going to start closing or getting moved to TIO. This obsession is getting destructive to cogent discussions.
 

Barry Natchitoches

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The UK has a public (NHS) and Private (insurance-based) system. Private insurance tends to be much cheaper than in the US for those who qualify because the insurance companies don't have to accept anyone they don't want to. Ireland has a similar system, except their "public" system often charges, and this is increasingly causing problems when people delay care because they can't pay for GP visits or tests. Then, they end up in the hospital with a covered medical crisis.

I am reasonably sure the UK Royal family has some sort of insurance, or their care is paid for out of their own money.

As for Kate, if she did have a hysterectomy, it is relatively easy to predict that a lady will be somewhat fragile for about two months or slightly longer. I was kept in a week after mine, which isn't uncommon. If there are complications, that can take longer. The older style of surgery (which I had and some women need for various reasons) takes several months to recover fully from. As someone silly enough to take a car trip to Sweden followed by a week at a large campground, then the road and ferry trip back after just six weeks, I can confirm that most ladies are better off not doing a lot of traveling sitting in one position or standing up for long periods.

All of which Kate would have to do if she returned to her usual heavy royal duties visiting hospitals, charities, schools, and civic organizations, aka travel, travel, travel.
Excuse me, but my wife had a radical hysterectomy (much more extensive than a regular hysterectomy) through an open incision (the incision was 12 inches long). She also had the ovaries and fallopian tubes removed, had a bunch of para-aortic and pelvis lymph nodes removed.

Not to mention removal of a cancerous, nearly 3 pound tumor that was the approximate size of the state of Texas.

With all of that, she was only kept in the hospital 4 DAYS AND 3 NIGHTS!!!

I doubt Kate’s hysterectomy - if that is what she had - was anywhere near as extensive as my wife’s cancer surgery.

Kate’s 10 to 14 day hospitalization was, indeed, special privilege, unless there was alot more going on than just that.

Even your week was much better than what my wife was given.

She had the same old style of surgery that you had, Melodi, but probably more extensive because of all the cancer that had to be removed.
 
Last edited:

Melodi

Disaster Cat
I had the same surgery as your wife, and in Ireland, I spent over a week in the hospital (actually, I spent a month, but it was because I also had other unrelated issues). I didn't have stage four cancer of the reproductive tract, but the surgeon thought I did. I had a tumor the size of an American football inside an ovary and one the size of an orange in my uterus. My whole system was also trashed with endometriosis. What looked like "classic" cancer was an extreme case of PCOS.

They send people home almost overnight in the USA because insurance demands it, and if the patient is uninsured, the government payments (if any) are way too low to cover the costs. I had a friend with no insurance who needed an emergency appendectomy. He e-mailed me in Ireland because he was operated on and sent home in the middle of the same night, even though they knew there was no one there to assist him. After all, the hospital didn't want to pay to keep him for observation.

I have had several friends now with full hysterectomies, and I can assure you that inside or outside a hospital, MOST women take at least a couple of months to recover. I might have been OK being sent home; I was up and eating the same afternoon due to a mix-up with the doctor's order, but he was impressed and happy about it. But because Ireland has something like a real health system (and I did have private insurance to top it up), they kept me another week until they were sure it wasn't cancer.

As you and your wife sadly discovered, many medical decisions are made in the US not based on best medical practice but on costs. They know people with limited or no insurance probably will never cover the full costs. Bills of over a million dollars are common, and even thirty years ago, it was the cause of 50 percent of bankruptcies when I worked in bankruptcy court.
I am very sorry your wife had to go through all that, although honestly, recovering at home with a loving husband might have been more comfortable for her than being in a US hospital.
 

Grounded Idealist

Hope Always
:dhr:

Last warning on the vax crap. From here on out, if i see it, it is going to get deleted. After that I’ll start bumping people from threads. Beyond that? Threads themselves are going to start closing or getting moved to TIO. This obsession is getting destructive to cogent discussions.
Serious question: is this now a TB2K rule with regards to posting? I’m in and out of here so am not up to date on the latest rules and regs of posting. TIA
 
Top