Putting an extra boomer into "the rotation" IMHO would do that.....
See the BS.
Putting an extra boomer into "the rotation" IMHO would do that.....
No doubtI think Putin wants to kick out the US.
Did they give them bullets, too?Dang, you mean all these years of training that have been given to soldiers through out history until now was not needed? Just give an weapon to anyone and you got a mean green fighting machine who will go balls deep in battle with those trained to actually fight? I guess like the matrix, holding the weapon zaps the know-how right to their gray matter?
The propaganda war is so thick on this one, that farmers should not need fertilizer for years to come.
A slight chance for a settlement is still possible but a good settlement would need to give both sides something to be happy and miserable about. Would Ukraine be willing to give up the breakaway regions and some small additional territory in exchange for cease fire and removal of Russian troops from the ‘rest’ of Ukraine. This can imho only be managed by an independent 3rd party respected by both sides.
Yes, also where the Soviets lost a huge number of men to do it. ETA: 400K+ Soviet casualties vs 26K+ Finnish.
Swedish volunteers were present for that mess on the side of the Finns.
You would be thinking incorrectly.there's NATO stockpiles that the individual countries can draw from under the correct treaty regs >>> I don't think anything supplied to Ukraine has come from NATO itself ....
the munitions coming from Poland should be all fairly new - the US would be sending in factory fresh - the question would be how old is the UK and German stuff ....
Putting an extra boomer into "the rotation" IMHO would do that.....
I remember when the Soviet Union collapsed. I had a friend who lived in Belgorod oblast. People were starving that winter. We sent them a number of parcels of foodstuffs they couldn't get (which was pretty much everything). His parents were older, and his paycheck couldn't feed them.
I shipped a LOT of candy and Marlboros by the carton-for barter these items were solid gold. I'd also send them what I could in cash; 50-100 bucks every two weeks or so. Hid it in Folgers coffee containers and glued back the safety seal. Every time that cash got through; and an American 20 bucks would feed a family of 4 very well for a week. He would slip the local postal inspector a pack of Marlboros and the packages went through with no problems. I shipped nothing illegal; his family ate well all winter. People went hungry that first winter-what little we sent was quietly spread around to his family and neighbors.
He'd ship me Vatra cigarettes and Soviet propaganda posters, sent me a Russian coat from his army service period, etc. And letters describing how happy they were to be free. They were hungry and facing hard times, but they were happy to be free.
I think you win the prize with this. Absolutely smoke and mirrors, bread and circus.
Every available attack and boomer should be out to sea including, a carrier strike group from the Atlantic.
From a website I follow. I concur with their assessment, and I have noticed similar things. Ukraine, as it stands right now, is not the main event. Something else is up...
ETA: I went and looked it up. So far, Russia has not even committed 1/3 of their available combat power to this. So like I said. Somethings up.
More war updates
The propaganda has gone SO over the top now that it's a subject in itself.
First of all, Putin is not weak, and Putin is not defeated. Word on the street is that Putin used his junk at first and will pull out the good stuff if NATO attacks. And it seems legit, there were a few good cruise missiles used but most of what got used really was not Russia's best.
I have seen lots of crap about Russian tech being "50 years behind the United States" and it is always from a war monger that probably wants Americans to believe victory will be easy. But even if America's tech is better, it is going to be used by a military that was recently maimed by a death vax. The playing field is probably quite level.
50 years is a lie to boot.Russia's tech would not be "50 years behind America" even if they never updated a Mig 29, which is their 80's plane that's damn near abandoned. Their tech in reality is a mix of "30 years behind" with a nice pile of "15 years behind" all the way up to "Ahead of the United States" when it comes to anti aircraft systems and cruise missiles. Does your 15 year old computer still do the job? With modern warfare systems, I don't think 15 years matters when the tools are in the right hands, 30 years does, but not 15. Lots of America's military stuff in use right now is a mix of the same - some of what America uses is 40 years old too. But it was so far ahead of Russia at that time that 40 years is not a deal breaker.
The bottom line is I don't think Russia's stuff is outdated enough for it to even be a factor. What WILL be a factor is how it gets used and whether or not it can be hacked.
Damn i hate to agree with thisConsidering human nature and the high level of stupidity currently in the western governments, yes. There is a good chance we will get nuclear dawn, not huge right now, but it is there.
Too many people are trying to poke a cornered and dangerous bear in every way possible, and this bear has access to as many nukes as he wants and the authority to use them.
Biden? Need to be plain spoken because we have them too.quite true . . . also its best to remember that we're playing with madmen who would not only be completely willing to kick over the table to win the game but would also very happily set the entire house on fire as they ran out the door with their loot
There was a thread on Free Republic that said that Putin in secret was fuming on how this war was going so disastrous for Russia. And also because of the costs each day that it is costing Russia He thought it would be over in no time. Well, this is reality and how often the people in power rather here in the U.S., in Russia, in Europe, or elsewhere do Not Not have their head in reality. If this continues Not to go well in Russia's favor, expect Putin to try to find a way out where he can save face. Saving face and looking like a hero is a big thing to all of these power elites and for their egos.
I lost some family in that war. We still hate Russians.I guess not the one your referring to as the causalities stated by you are off. (Soviet suffered over 300,000 casualties compared to around 65,000 for the Finns)
I'm also referring to the one where Stalin had decimated the Soviet military leaders , leading to poorly lead troops, and horrible logistics and tactical ability. The Soviets leadership took care of that in the 2nd inning.
Rethinking Stalin’s Purge of the Red Army, 1937-38
(just a snippet as I want to keep this post to a readable length .... much more interesting reading at the link)
"Marshal Mikhail Tukhachevskii, the Red Army’s most creative thinker and strategist, was the most prominent victim of the military purge in 1937, but the net was cast much wider. Over the next two years over 30,000 army leaders were discharged from the ranks; thousands were arrested and executions were widespread. The violence began to subside in late 1938 and reinstatements to the ranks became more common in 1939, but the military purge remained a highly destabilizing and damaging attack on the Red Army. It was a central moment in the broader Great Terror that gripped the Soviet Union in the mid-to-late 1930s "
What Was the Winter War?
"
Less than two years before the Soviet Union faced off against Nazi Germany during World War II, it waged a bloody war with another adversary: the tiny nation of Finland.
Russia’s feud with its Nordic neighbor began in 1939, when Soviet leader Joseph Stalin looked to expand his influence over Eastern Europe. Citing concerns about a potential attack by the Germans, Stalin demanded that Finland’s border with Russia be moved back 16 miles along the Karelian Isthmus to create a buffer zone around the city of Leningrad. He also wanted the Finns to hand over several islands in the Gulf of Finland and lease the Soviets territory on the Hanko Peninsula for construction of a naval base.
The Soviets offered a large swath of Russian territory as part of the deal, but the Finns were suspicious of their motives and turned them down. On November 30, 1939, following a series of ultimatums and failed negotiations, the Soviet Red Army launched an invasion of Finland with half a million troops.
Though vastly outnumbered and outgunned in what became known as the “Winter War,” the Finns had the advantage of fighting on home turf. Led by Marshal Carl Gustaf Mannerheim, they hunkered down behind a network of trenches, concrete bunkers and field fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus and beat back repeated Soviet tank assaults. Elsewhere on the frontier, Finnish ski troops used the rugged landscape to conduct hit-and-run attacks on isolated Soviet units. Their guerilla tactics were only aided by the freezing Finnish winter, which bogged the Soviets down and made their soldiers easy to spot against snowy terrain. One Finnish sniper, a farmer named Simo Häyhä, was eventually credited with over 500 kills.
While the Finns put up a spirited resistance during the winter of 1939-1940, their troops were ultimately no match for the sheer immensity of the Red Army. In February 1940, following one of the largest artillery bombardments since World War I, the Soviets renewed their onslaught and overran the Finnish defenses on the Karelian Isthmus. With its forces low on ammunition and nearing the brink of exhaustion, Finland agreed to peace terms the following month.
The treaty ending the Winter War forced Finland to cede 11 percent of its territory to the Soviet Union, yet the country maintained its independence and later squared off against Russia a second time during World War II. For the Soviets, meanwhile, victory came at a heavy cost. During just three months of fighting, their forces suffered over 300,000 casualties compared to around 65,000 for the Finns. The Winter War may have also carried important consequences for World War II. Among other things, the Red Army’s lackluster performance is often cited as a key factor in Adolf Hitler’s mistaken belief that his June 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union would be a success.
"
I lost some family in that war. We still hate Russians.
Thats an Airsoft, you can see the shield in front of the optic,
By population:They have an EXTREME level of mutual distrust.
This is just a temporary relationship of convenience.
F#ing gypos. Tanks and Travel Trailers are never safe when they are around.
F#ing gypos. Tanks and Travel Trailers are never safe when they are around.