GOV/MIL Main "Great Reset" Thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Norway)


Norway To Limit Electricity Exports, 'Cannot Rule Out' Rationing

Norway has notably been referred to as the "battery of Europe" thanks to its ability to generate and export massive quantities of hydroelectric power.

MONDAY, AUG 08, 2022 - 04:20 PM
Norway on Monday announced that due to an 'uncertain and demanding situation' over sky-high electricity prices - caused by low water levels at hydroelectric stations (in what they refer to as a "weather-dependent power supply"), as well as the "dramatic situation in Europe" regarding Ukraine, the government will be limiting electricity exports "when the water level in the reservoirs drops to very low levels."

They also won't rule out the 'low probability' of having to ration electricity in the spring.

So far this year, far less electricity (11.6 TWh) has been produced in southern Norway than at the same time last year - 18 per cent less. In South-West Norway, the total production of adjustable hydropower last week was the lowest we have seen so far this year.

Collectively, this results in historically high electricity prices and a situation where, for the first time in many years, we cannot completely rule out a period of electricity rationing in the spring. But our professional authorities emphasize that the probability of this is low. -Minister of Petroleum and Energy, Norway

1660011466576.png

"This is not something people can afford to pay," said Morten Frisch, a Norwegian energy consultant based in the United Kingdom, in a statement to the Daily Telegraph, adding that the cost of energy in Norway has already risen between 10 and 20 times the price people were paying last year.

"When they run dry, they run dry, and it's likely to take a minimum of three months, possibly six months, before they can be refilled by rain," Frisch continued.

As Torkel Nyberg of OilPrice.com writes:

A cut in Norwegian power exports would be felt in Northwest Europe, which itself is grappling with issues at coal and nuclear power generating plants due to the low water level in rivers limiting coal supply via barges and warm river water unsuitable for cooling nuclear reactors.

As a result of these issues and the uncertainty over natural gas supply from Russia, power prices in Germany for the year ahead jumped to a record on Friday.

This summer's dry weather across Europe has affected Norwegian hydropower, which accounts for 90% of Norwegian power generation. The remaining around 10% of the electricity supply in Norway comes from wind power.

While Europe scrambles to procure natural gas for winter power generation and heating, Western Europe's biggest oil and gas producer, Norway, has a whole different power problem this summer—dry weather, which depletes water reservoirs for hydropower.

Although Norway doesn't use gas for power generation, Europe's gas and energy crisis is felt there, too. In recent weeks, hydropower producers have been discouraged from tapping more water for hydropower generation to save water for the winter. Operators were also asked not to export too much electricity to the rest of Europe as reservoirs are not as full as in previous years, and not to rely on imports from Europe, which is struggling with energy supply. Some Norwegian utilities, including top electricity producer Statkraft, have followed the plea from transmission system operator Statnet not to produce too much electricity now.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Report: Inflation Could Cause ‘Uptick in Hunger, Homelessness’


KATHERINE HAMILTON8 Aug 202278

Poll findings suggest “U.S. cities could be facing an uptick in hunger and homelessness in the next coming months…” because of rampant inflation overseen by the Biden administration, Axios reported on Monday.

The outlet spoke with Robert Blendon, the co-director of an NPR, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health survey which found that Americans are struggling to afford housing and “timely medical care for serious illnesses.”

“It’s very striking,” Blendon told Axios. “We’re in an inflationary period here and it’s unusually broadly hitting minority communities even worse than everyone else.”

In a sample of roughly 4,000 adults between May 16 – June 13, 2022, 60 percent of black and Latino households, 70 percent of Native American households, 44 percent of white households, and 36 percent of Asian households say inflation is causing serious financial hardship. The poll also found that 16 percent of black renters, 10 percent of Latino renters, 21 percent of Native American renters, 9 percent of white renters, and 5 percent of Asian renters, “say they have either been evicted or threatened with eviction.” The poll focused heavily on comparing racial/ethnic minority populations to the white population.

Other media outlets have released similar reports about how inflation is impacting hunger and homelessness. In July, the Washington Post noted that “rising housing costs, combined with persistent inflation for basic necessities such as gas and food, have left more Americans newly homeless and millions more fearing they’ll soon lose their homes.” Food banks across the country are also reporting a higher demand than during the coronavirus pandemic.

The survey was conducted before the Department of Labor released data showing that inflation, which was already at a 40-year high, rose to an annual rate of 9.1 percent in June. The real-world implications of rising inflation are expected to drive voters to the polls in November, with voters consistently listing the economy as their top priority.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

GOP Sen. Marshall: Reconciliation Bill’s Increased Tax on Oil Drilling Will Increase Gas Prices

IAN HANCHETT8 Aug 20225

Video on website .31 min

On Monday’s broadcast of Newsmax TV’s “Spicer & Co.,” Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) said that the increase in costs for fossil fuel production on public lands and waters through increased minimum royalties for oil and gas extraction on public lands and waters contained in the Inflation Reduction Act reconciliation bill passed by the Senate will “absolutely, without question,” cause the price of gas to increase and predicted that the corporate tax increases contained in the bill will exacerbate inflation and kill jobs.

Marshall stated, “Let’s talk about the inflation part of this just for a second. It’s going to raise corporate taxes, and that’s going to be passed on down to consumers. When you raise corporate taxes, there’s less money to reinvest in the company, so that’s going to kill jobs. When you start killing jobs, you mess with the supply chain. And then lastly, this has a higher tax on discovering and drilling for oil as well. So, that’s going to impact the price of gasoline. So, absolutely, without question, Reaganomics would tell me that this bill is inflationary, and it’s going to kill jobs. It’s going to increase the price of gasoline at the pump.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Thomas Massie: A President Just Raided a Former President, His Political Opponent

The Associated PressThe Associated Press
ALANA MASTRANGELO8 Aug 202213

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) reacted to the FBI’s shock raid of former President Donald Trump’s Florida home, Mar-A-Lago, on Monday, proclaiming that “until Joe Biden denies it, a President just raided a former President – his political opponent.”

“Let that sink in,” Massie added. “There are only three branches of government. The FBI is works [sic] for the current President.”

1660023376965.png

“Is AG Garland bitter that Trump kept him from becoming a Supreme Court justice? Is that why, according to news reports, he raided Trump?” the congressman added in a follow-up tweet.

1660023418944.png

Trump also reacted to the FBI raid, writing, “These are dark times for our Nation, as my beautiful home, Mar- A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents.”

“Nothing like this has ever happened to a President of the United States before,” the 45th president added.

Meanwhile, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has promised to launch a full-throated investigation into Attorney General Merrick Garland and the FBI’s raid on Trump’s home.

“I’ve seen enough,” McCarthy said. “The Department of Justice has reached an intolerable state of weaponized politicization.”

“When Republicans take back the House, we will conduct immediate oversight of this department, follow the facts, and leave no stone unturned,” the House Republican Leader added, before calling on Garland to “preserve your documents and clear your calendar.”

1660023469463.png

Many others on social media compared the FBI raid to what is typically seen transpiring in a third world country or a banana republic.

Donald Trump Jr. reacted to the raid by saying that Democrats are “openly targeting their political enemies,” adding that this “is what you see happen in 3rd World Banana Republics!!!”

The FBI was reportedly focused on documents Trump may have taken with him from the White House to Mar-A-Lago after leaving office.

This is a developing news story.

You can follow Alana Mastrangelo on Facebook and Twitter at @ARmastrangelo, and on Instagram.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dershowitz: Trump Raid ‘Improper’ — ‘This Is Misconduct’

JEFF POOR8 Aug 20221,697

View: https://youtu.be/L26taXZcDZM
3:57 min

Monday, on the heels of news that former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, FL was raided by the FBI, Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz criticized the raid as “misconduct.”

According to Dershowitz, a raid is the method of last resort, and the onus will be on the Biden administration to show justification, or anything obtained in the raid would be suppressed.

“The raid is supposed to be a last resort,” he said. “But this administration has used the weaponization of the justice system against its political enemies. It has arrested people, denied them bail, put them in handcuffs – used all kinds of techniques that are not usually applied to American citizens. I just hope this raid has the justification. If it doesn’t have the justification, the materials seized in it will be suppressed.”

“This is improper, and this is misconduct,” Dershowitz added. “We have to find out what the facts are. But we have to make sure the shoe fits on the other foot – that we want to make sure what is being one here is something that Democrats would not oppose if it were being done to Democratic operatives, as well.”

^^^^^

Dershowitz: DOJ Can’t Use Mar-a-Lago Evidence if FBI Raid Improper

JOEL B. POLLAK8 Aug 2022331

Harvard Law School professor emeritus and noted criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz said Monday evening that the evidence seized by the FBI in a raid on former President Donald Trump’s home would be ruled out if the raid were improper.

After telling Newsmax the FBI raid appeared to be “misconduct,” absent further evidence, Dershowitz went on to explain:

I just hope this raid has a justification. If it doesn’t have a justification, the material seized in it will be suppressed. … The law is clear: you don’t engage in a raid unless you’ve exhausted all of the other remedies. … Raids are not a first recourse in America. They’re a last recourse. And so the government will have to show a court, eventually, that they exhausted all other possibilities or they had a reasonable basis for believing that the evidence would be destroyed if it was sought in the normal legal course of events, through subpoena.

Federal courts follow the exclusionary rule in criminal prosecutions, which is that evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment must usually be excluded from a prosecution, even if it implicates the defendant in a crime. The FBI obtained a search warrant, whose validity is presumed, but which may, Dershowitz suggested, have been obtained on an improper basis.

If the FBI and the DOJ knew that the evidence seized from the raid on Mar-a-Lago Monday were likely to be suppressed, that would lend weight to the speculation that the purpose was political, rather than to pursue the truth in a criminal investigation.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Turley on Trump Raid: ‘Why Didn’t Merrick Garland Ask for a Special Counsel to Be Appointed?’

JEFF POOR8 Aug 20227
Video on website 8:40 min

Monday, during an appearance on FNC’s “Jesse Watters Primetime” following news that the FBI had raided former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, FL for undisclosed reasons, George Washington University Law School professor and constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley questioned why Attorney General Merrick Garland would not have proceeded with a special counsel before green-lighting the raid.

According to Turley, the potential appearance of politicization would have warranted an impartial investigation, which could have been done with a special counsel.

“Well, it’s a breathtaking moment to have a raid like this on a former president and potentially the future opponent of the current president,” he said. “My first reaction beyond shock is that it is baffling how this raid would occur, but Merrick Garland decided not to appoint a special counsel. If there was evidence that supports a warrant, and apparently a federal judge found that evidence, why didn’t Merrick Garland ask for a special counsel to be appointed? You know, people like Archibald Cox and others are celebrated because we appointed a special counsel to look into Nixon. Why? It was because we wanted to assure the American people that an investigation would not be political, would not be influenced in that case by Nixon himself.”

“Now, here you have the past opponent of the current president and the expected future opponent,” Turley continued. “I can’t imagine how Attorney General Garland would look at that situation and not see an absolute necessity for a special counsel. And, instead, they did this raid on this — on the former president’s home. And it is going to trigger the anger that you have already seen. Now, we don’t know what these charges are. The assumption is that it is related to January 6. We have seen warrants being issued from a grand jury. I have expressed skepticism over the ability to charge the president on the evidence that we have seen thus far in that committee.”

“But, for me, there is a threshold question of who should be ordering these types of raids,” he added. “Merrick Garland has refused to appoint a special counsel in Hunter Biden. He apparently has not appointed a special counsel in this case thus far. I just can’t understand why.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Ted Cruz: “They’re Coming for YOU Too”

By J.D. Rucker • Aug. 8, 2022

Following the outrageous FBI raid at Mar-a-Lago, Senator Ted Cruz took to Twitter to voice his concerns. As he noted, it’s not just President Trump they’re going after. They’re coming after us as well.

The FBI raiding Donald Trump is unprecedented. It is corrupt & an abuse of power. What Nixon tried to do, Biden has now implemented: The Biden Admin has fully weaponized DOJ & FBI to target their political enemies. And with 87K new IRS agents, they’re coming for YOU too.

Congress must demand answers. We need hearings; we need subpoenas. Dems in charge will refuse, but the American people deserve to know why Biden is using the FBI as his political enforcers. Tin-pot dictators do that, but that’s not how America works.

1660024322170.png

This same DOJ:

  • ignored Hunter Biden (who filmed himself committing multiple felonies);
  • ignored Hillary Clinton;
  • largely ignored BLM/ANTIFA rioters;
  • ignored dangerous protestors outside Justices homes; &
  • ignored Jeffrey Epstein’s clients
WHY??

1660024257994.png

Ironically, Eric Holder predicted the Biden DOJ

1660024203908.png

If the GOP can take control of the House and/or Senate, many have promised to hold the DoJ accountable. We’ll see if they keep their promise. At this stage, we’ll see if there are even midterm elections at all.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Rep. Andy Biggs on Newsmax: This Is 'an Authoritarian' Govt

Video on website 1:57 min
(Newsmax/"Rob Schmitt Tonight")

By Eric Mack | Monday, 08 August 2022 09:08 PM EDT

Like the Biden administration plans to massively expand the IRS, the FBI raid on former President Donald Trump's private residence at Mar-a-Lago is a concerted effort to "weaponize" against Americans "they disagree with politically," according to Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., on Newsmax.

"We don't really have insight yet; the FBI, DOJ haven't come out publicly and said what they're looking for, but I can tell you this: This gets at the heart of what I was saying over the weekend that FBI and DOJ needs to be looked at very carefully because they have weaponized those agencies, those police agencies, against Americans who they disagree with politically and it wouldn't surprise me if we get down to that again, Rob," Biggs told Monday's "Rob Schmitt Tonight."

Biggs is a House member who will be voting against the so-called "Inflation Reduction Act" that seeks to add IRS agents in an apparent effort to find more taxes to collect for the government's massive spending agenda.

"Again, that's going to be weaponized and politicized, just like it was under Lois Lerner where they went after conservative organizations," Biggs warned. "They're going to be coming after you and me and others like us. They're going to be turning us upside down to shake every dime and nickel and penny out of our pockets and punishes us if they can, if they feel we haven't given them enough.

"That's where we're headed. That's an authoritarian type of government, Rob."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Former AG Matthew Whitaker Rips Mar-a-Lago Raid: 'This Is Something From Banana Republics'
By Bob Hoge | Aug 08, 2022 10:30 PM ET

Former Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight Monday and excoriated the Justice Department for conducting today’s raid on the residence of a former president and current rival to the sitting POTUS. As we’ve been reporting, hundreds of FBI agents descended onto Donald Trump’s Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago, and left with many boxes of evidence. Whitaker told fill-in host Will Cain:

I just think this is an outrageous expansion of the FBI’s—really, I don’t know how else you say it—attack on Donald Trump for the last six years…

We’ve crossed the Rubicon to some extent. This is something from banana republics, not the United States of America.

Whitaker believes President Joe Biden would not have been consulted about the raid, but that Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Chris Wray both almost certainly would have had to sign off on the criminal investigation that led to it.

I would be surprised if this Department of Justice allowed Joe Biden to be involved. That would obviously be a line that shouldn’t be crossed in a criminal investigation. But yes, I would expect that Chris Wray and Merrick Garland both signed off on the criminal investigation of Donald Trump.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1556799394678284289
2:56 min

Whitaker served as Acting Attorney General from November 7, 2018, to February 14, 2019, after Jeff Sessions resigned. He also accused the Justice Department of politicizing the institution:

It’s hard not to believe that these [actions] are politically motivated. I have spent seven and a half years at the Department of Justice. It’s an institution that should be trusted, but they have eroded that trust to a point now, where I think, to your point earlier, they have a burden to demonstrate that this investigation is not completely politically motivated after Hillary Clinton walked scott-free for the last seven years.

What happens next? Whitaker thinks things are only going to get more problematic:

This is where the American people need to ask very difficult questions. Congress needs to ask very difficult questions. Because at the end of the day, if they’re really planning to bring Donald Trump to Washington, DC in front of a Washington, DC jury and a Washington, DC judge, you know, this republic is maybe not strong enough to bear that burden ultimately. But we will see.

The FBI is into an unprecedented area. The Department of Justice under the Democrats leadership I think is going into a very dangerous field right now.

Monday’s raid adds to the disturbing trend of the FBI to mount junta-style investigations and raids on Trump supporters and opponents of the Biden administration. They came after Roger Stone in 2019 like he was a dangerous terrorist, conducting a dawn operation with heavily-armed agents to bring him into custody for allegedly making false statements to Congress. Just last month the FBI repeated their antics, conducting yet another raid on a former Trump Justice Department official, Jeffrey Clark, who had to beg to be allowed to put on his pants. Add to the list the raid of Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe’s home in November 2021, and it becomes pretty clear that what we have here is a pattern.

This descent into banana republic politics is dangerous to our nation. Turning our Justice Department into a Democrat-armed force to intimidate political foes and their supporters is un-American. We can only hope Republicans do in fact dominate the midterms and put a stop to this nonsense.

Read continuing coverage of the Mar-a-Lago raid here.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Ministry figures suggest 29,000 farms could be hit by nitrogen plans

July 21, 2022 Photo: DutchNews.nl Finance ministry calculations suggest 11,200 livestock farmers would have to close down and a further 17,600 would need to reduce the number of animals they keep in order to meet EU rules on nitrogen pollution.

The ministry on Wednesday published a large number of documents relating to the crisis following requests from MPs, in the wake of claims made in the NRC newspaper. These documents, according to the NRC, highlight the differences between the agriculture ministry, which is responsible for solving the crisis, and the finance ministry which has to pick up the bill. In particular, the documents show that the agriculture ministry plans ‘may not fit in the budget’, the paper said.

The finance ministry figures are based on plans to reduce nitrogen emissions by 39,000 tonnes, in line with government strategy. But officials say a more modest reduction of 30,000 tonnes would also meet the EU requirements and soften the blow for farmers, the NRC reported.

According to the Financieele Dagblad, the finance ministry says the reduction could be as little as 23,000 tonnes, at a cost of €10 billion, which is well below the government’s budget of €24 billion. The ministry, the FD says, also suggests focusing on poultry and pig farmers, because they would be relatively cheaper to buy out than dairy farms.

Protests
Farmers are protesting at government aims to reduce nitrogen compound emissions by 50% by 2030, and by 75% in protected nature reserves known as Natura 2000 areas, in line with EU rules. The most recent round of demonstrations were sparked by a government announcement in June, suggesting some farm closures were inevitable and the publication of a detailed map suggesting which areas needed reductions from 12% to 95%.

Nature minister Christianne van der Wal has given provinces a year to come up with detailed plans aiming at halving emissions of ammonia and nitrogen oxide by 2030. The Netherlands has some 52,000 farms.

^^^

What’s all the fuss about nitrogen in the Netherlands?

June 5, 2022 - By Robin Pascoe

Nitrogen-based pollution is behind delays to the building of new homes and roads, has led to plans to reduce the number of cows and pigs in the Netherlands and is causing damage to rare habitats. Here’s what you need to know.

Nitrogen, or N2, constitutes 78% of the atmosphere and is harmless to life on earth. In a reactive form it is essential for life: all organisms need reactive nitrogen. It is a colourless, odorless element and is found in the water we drink, the soil we walk on and in the air we breath. But in the Netherlands, which is densely populated and has an extremely intensive farming sector, it is also a major source of pollution. The new government even has a minister dedicated to dealing with it.

What is nitrogen pollution? Nitrogen can also be highly polluting when some compounds – like ammonia (NH3), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and nitrous oxide (N2O) – are present in high concentrations. Nitrous oxide is also known as the forgotten greenhouse gas. In the Netherlands, nitrogen pollution derives from two main sources – burning fossil fuels for energy or transport (nitrogen oxides), and from the manure created by the livestock farming industry (ammonia and nitrous oxide). Artificial fertilisers containing nitrogen are also a source of pollution during both the production process and when over-used on farm land.

What does it do? While nitrogen is essential for plants to grow, it is also one of the main threats to biodiversity. Nitrogen pollution allows nitrogen-tolerant plants to survive and out-compete more sensitive plants and funghi. Nitrogen is soluble and can impact on fish and aquatic life. It encourages plant growth, including algal blooms, which choke water courses and kill fish. Nitrogen oxide (NO2) is linked to respiratory problems in both healthy people and people with lung disease.

Nitrous oxide is a long-lasting greenhouse gas, said to be 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide and a component part of acid rain. What causes nitrogen pollution? Nitrogen oxides are created when fossil fuels are burned by cars, in power plants and through industrial activity. They are also generated on construction and demolition sites from diesel and petrol-fueled engines in trucks and diggers – hence the government’s decision to halt construction projects in areas which are already suffering from too much nitrogen-based pollution.

Nitrous oxide is produced in soil but it is also generated during the manufacture and use of artificial fertilisers and by manure in the intensive livestock industry. Ammonia is also released during the breakdown of animal manure produced by the Netherlands intensive farming sector. Yet while animal manure contains plenty of nitrogen, which can be used as fertiliser, too much will make the soil too acidic, killing vital microbes and damaging productivity. It also leaches into the ditches and waterways which crisscross much Dutch farmland.

Ammonia also reacts with nitrous oxide and moisture to form small particles which can penetrate into sensitive parts of the lungs as part of fine particulate pollution.

What has the government done? In May 2019, the Council of State ruled the government’s strategy for reducing excess nitrogen was in breach of EU directives on protecting vulnerable habitats and that the way the release of nitrogen was being calculated when assessing construction project licences was questionable. That plan was known as the Programma Aanpak Stikstof, or PAS, and was developed to reduce the emissions of reactive forms of nitrogen, such as ammonia from farming and nitrous oxide from burning fuel, by ‘balancing out’ pollution against measures to combat it.

The court’s decision meant that the Netherlands had to develop new policies to reduce nitrogen-based pollution and that every activity which led to nitrogen being emitted, from building new homes to farming, needed a permit.

The ruling prompted a flurry of measures. Thousands of building projects were put on hold, threatening housing targets, the speed limit on all roads was reduced to 100 kph during the day and plans were drawn up to slash the size of the intensive farming sector. Some officials even suggested to reduce the amount of protein in animal feed so that manure would be less polluting or giving livestock feed containing an enzyme which reduces the amount of nitrogen they produce.

Is this a particularly Dutch problem? ‘Flanders in Belgium is in the same situation because environmentalists there went to court using the EU directive and called for a new strategy as well,’ says Leiden professor and nitrogen expert Jan Willem Erisman. ‘Both the rulings related to a European court decision in 2018 which said EU members have to protect vulnerable habitats and reduce nitrogen. So if German or French activists went to court, the situation would probably be the same there.’

And the new government? Christianne van der Wal has been appointed as the Netherlands’ first minister for nature and nitrogen, which falls under agricultural ministry. She published an outline of her plans in April which she said, would ‘accelerate and sharply reduce nitrogen emissions – voluntarily where possible, mandatory where that is not possible.’

The government has reaffirmed its targets: by 2030, nitrogen emissions should be cut by 50% and 75% of the nitrogen-sensitive Natura 2000 areas should be back at a ‘healthy level’. Van der Wal is setting up several funds to buy out farms and to help farms innovate to reduce their nitrogen emissions. She has also allocated funding to focus on farms close to vulnerable habitats which are part of the EU’s Natura 2000 network.

Farmers, meanwhile, have been staging protests since the Council of State ruling. In particular, they are angry about the threat of compulsory purchase orders, which they say are unfair and that other sectors, such as aviation, should face cuts as well.

Professor Erisman says there are two main routes to solving the problem. ‘There is money in place and technology, so it is partly a question of building a new economy around sustainable energy. I see that as a technological fix for a technological NOx problem. ‘Agriculture is more difficult to deal with because it is more of an ecological problem and it is more regional because farms located close to Natura 2000 areas have a higher contribution than farms in the north of Groningen.

The low hanging fruit has been picked because emissions have gone down 65% since 1990.’ MPs and ministers due to discuss the government’s plans to reduce nitrogen-based pollution on Tuesday, amid reports that major cuts in livestock farming close to Natura 2000 areas are on the cards.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
I cover the European collapse as it will precede ours and they are using the same playbook. I want to see what that looks like.

(France)


France Looks To Keep Nuclear Power Plants Running Despite Heatwave

MONDAY, AUG 08, 2022 - 10:30 PM
By Tsvetana Paraskova of OilPrice.com

French authorities have allowed five nuclear power plants in France to continue operations and discharge hot water in rivers even during another heatwave as the country looks to keep its electricity generation stable and conserve natural gas for the coming winter.

Power giant EDF has warned that it might have to reduce nuclear power generation this summer because of environmental regulations as the water levels of rivers are low and water temperatures high. Water from rivers is typically used to cool reactors, while environmental regulations usually set limits on nuclear power output because hot water re-entering rivers could endanger the local flora and fauna.

However, under exceptional circumstances this year, the French nuclear energy regulator, ASN, said on Monday that it is temporarily changing the rules on hot water discharge at the nuclear power plants Blayais, Bugey, Golfech, Saint-Alban, and Tricastin.

The regulator thus prolonged the waivers for those plants, considering that the government has requested that nuclear power generation be maintained at as high levels as possible, in view of preserving gas and hydropower for the autumn and the winter, ASN said.

France's EDF has warned for weeks that nuclear power generation in France would be reduced as high temperatures of rivers Rhone and Garonne make them too hot to cool reactors.

France has had issues with its nuclear power generation this year, which has reduced the available electricity supply in France and Europe and sent French power prices for next year surging. Half of all reactors EDF is operating are currently offline for planned maintenance or repairs.

France's nuclear power generation accounts for around 70 percent of its electricity mix, and when its reactors are fully operational, it is a net exporter of electricity to other European countries. Prolonged maintenance at several nuclear reactors this year, however, means that France—and the rest of Europe—have less nuclear-generated power supply now.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Are Older Workers Propping Up The US Economy?
Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via Of Two Minds,

Are 55 and older workers propping up the U.S. economy? The data is rather persuasive that the answer is yes.


The chart of U.S. employment ages 25 to 54 years of age and 55 and older reveals a startling change.

There are now 20 million more 55+ employed than there were in 2000, an equivalent of the entire workforce of Spain.
This unprecedented demographic / employment transition is worth a closer look.



As the second chart shows, some of this increase is due to the rising population of Americans over 55 years of age--an increase of 42 million. In 2000, 30% of those 55 and older were employed. Today, over 37% are employed--a significant increase in the percentage of 55+ people who are working.



An increase of 20 million employees age 55 and older is so large that it's difficult to grasp. An increase equivalent to an entire nation's workforce is one way to make sense of it. Another is to look at the increase of America's total population from 2000 to 2022, which is about 48 million people (282 million in 2000, 330 million today).

The total U.S. population increased by 17%. The 55+ population increased by 42 million (from 57 million in 2000 to 99 million today), a 74% increase. Total employment in the 55+ cohort increased by 113%.

In 2000, only 17.6% of the 55 and older populace had a job. Now the percentage is 37.5%
A 20% increase in the percentage of 55+ who are employed in a 20-year span is unprecedented.

If the percentage of employed 55+ had stayed the same, there would only be 17 million 55+ workers today. Instead, there are over 37 million. This raises a question: why are so many older workers continuing to work longer than they did in 1990 and 2000?

I doubt there is one cause or answer. We can attribute this dramatic shift to a number of causes: older households that never recovered from the financial damage wrought by the 2008-09 Global Financial Meltdown; older workers (like me) who only have Social Security for retirement income who can't get by on just their SSA check; those who enjoy their work and see no reason to stop; people who retired and became bored out of their minds so they returned to the workforce; parents who keep working to help their offspring and/or elderly parents; people who keep working to maintain healthcare coverage until they qualify for Medicare; older entrepreneurs who can dial back their workload but who still love their work, and so on.

All of these reflect structural changes in the U.S. economy: a steady decline in the purchasing power of wages and financial security, systemic exposure to the risks of financial bubbles bursting, etc. The bottom line is that nest-eggs that were deemed adequate are no longer adequate, and the only way to fill the gap is to keep earning money.

These changes are reflected in the decline in the percentage of employed 55+ people from 28% in 1970 to 18% in 1990 and 2000, and the subsequent rise to 37%. In an economy with an expanding workforce of young employees and rising productivity, more older workers could retire early. This is no longer the case.

In many cases, there is no nest-egg due to bankruptcy via huge medical bills, the heavy burdens of student loans, or the costs of helping children and grandchildren or very elderly parents. (Many of us aged 65-70 are taking care of parents 90+ years of age and helping out with active 3-year olds. Retirement? You're joking.)

As a result, expenses have risen rather than dropped for the 55+ cohort, requiring an income to stabilize household finances. (Have you looked at childcare (grandchildren) and elderly care (parents) costs recently?)

Another important structural change is the demand for workers of any age who are reliable and able to do the work. People who are accustomed to the structures of work by virtue of 40 or 50 years of employment are generally reliable workers and thus valued by employers beset by a scarcity of reliable, productive employees. (My first formal paycheck was issued by Dole Pineapple in 1970. That's 52 years of getting accustomed to the demands of employment. I'm pretty well broken in now.)

There are also demographic and cultural dynamics in play: the continuing satisfactions of work and the loss of purpose many feel in retirement, the decline in age discrimination, longer lifespans, etc.

Whatever the causes, 37 million workers 55 and older are earning money that's flowing into the economy and providing stable productivity--20 million more 55+ workers than 20 years ago. These 20 million jobs generate income that isn't just funding cruises and RVs. In many cases, it's supporting several generations on either side of the 55+ cohort.

Are 55 and older workers propping up the U.S. economy? The data is rather persuasive that the answer is yes.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Oil Spikes As Ukraine Operator Halts Some Russian Pipeline Flows

TUESDAY, AUG 09, 2022 - 04:00 AM
Crude oil prices are higher this morning after reports that Russian oil flows via the southern leg of a major pipeline were suspended.

Ukrtransnafta, which operates Ukraine’s oil pipeline network and transits crude via the southern leg of the Druzhba link, halted Russian crude deliveries on Aug. 4, Transneft said in a statement on Tuesday.

This means flows to the Druzhba pipeline toward Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia are halted.

According to a spokesman for the country’s crude pipeline operator Transneft, EU sanctions are preventing Russia’s transit payment.

Flows via the northern leg of the link to Poland and Germany are unaffected.


The reaction is notable but not extreme for now, with WTI reversing overnight losses down to $89 and heading back towards $92...



“The market reaction tells you the fragility of the fundamentals remains acute,” said Harry Altham, an analyst at brokerage StoneX.

Transneft is reportedly working on alternative options to transfer the funds, according to the statement.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

End of the Republic
With the FBI raid on Trump’s home, America has fallen into the abyss.


Tue Aug 9, 2022Robert Spencer281 comments

When the FBI raided Donald Trump’s home on Monday, a key aspect of what made the United States of America great and free has been lost, and likely cannot be recovered. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson detested one another for years before their eventual reconciliation, but neither one used the agencies of the U.S. government to hound, persecute or discredit the other. Other bitter political opponents throughout the history of the republic have never before used the government’s own mechanisms of justice to do injustice to their foes. Joe Biden, Merrick Garland and their henchmen have brought America to a new phase of its history, and it is not likely to be one that is marked by respect for the rule of law or defense of the rights of individual citizens. Instead, we are entering an ugly age of authoritarianism, in which the brute force of the state is used to bend the people to the will of the tyrant.

Trump announced on Monday, “These are dark times for our Nation, as my beautiful home, Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents. Nothing like this has ever happened to a President of the United States before. After working and cooperating with the relevant Government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate.”

The 45th president is not given to understatement, but the FBI raid on his home is much more than just unnecessary and inappropriate. It is criminal. The FBI that was heavily involved in trying to frame and destroy Trump in the Russian Collusion hoax is now trying once again to destroy him, apparently by claiming that he improperly took classified material from the White House. They never cared when Hillary Clinton misused classified material on a grand scale; what is the difference? They’re also likely trying to find something to link him more firmly to the January 6 “insurrection” that never was. The Left’s January 6 narrative has been full of holes from the beginning: Trump told the demonstrators to proceed peacefully, the people who entered the Capitol had no weapons, and no one had sketched out any kind of plan to do what the Left continues to claim that Trump was trying to do all along, overthrow the government and rule as a dictator.

But Joe Biden’s handlers are desperately afraid that Trump will return to the White House on January 20, 2025 and that things will go harder for them next time than they did during his first term. They’re afraid that a vengeful Trump will do a genuine and thorough housecleaning of the desperately corrupt and compromised Washington bureaucracy, and that many of them will, quite justly, end up out of power, and some of them will, even more justly, end up in prison. So they’ve determined to pre-emptively do the same to Trump. If they can’t actually find anything to prosecute him for (and Lord knows they’ve tried, this is the most investigated and poked and prodded and scrutinized man in American history, and still those who hate him have nothing), then at very least they hope to taint Trump so completely in the eyes of the distracted and indifferent public that they will have a fighting chance in 2024.

This is banana republic stuff. This is the kind of thing that moved Woodrow Wilson to intervene militarily in Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, and Nicaragua, explaining: “We are friends of constitutional government in America; we are more than its friends, we are its champions. I am going to teach the South American republics to elect good men.” Wilson was an authoritarian scoundrel and one of the worst presidents we have ever endured, but much as he hated Theodore Roosevelt and feared that he would be reelected to the presidency in 1920 (instead, Roosevelt died in 1919), Wilson never had rogue government agents raid Roosevelt’s home looking for something they could use to pin some crime on him.

Merrick Garland recently signaled that something like this was in the offing, when he emphasized that no one was above the law and anyone could be prosecuted. No one is above that law, that is, except Hillary Clinton, and Hunter Biden, and all the FBI officials who have been implicated in the Russian Collusion hoax, and all the other Leftists who have escaped and will continue to escape prosecution because they hold what the elites consider to be acceptable political opinions.

The two-tier justice system that aggressively prosecutes conservatives while turning a blind eye to Leftists who have committed similar or worse crimes is now out in the open. Trump did nothing, but the FBI will find some crime for which the Justice Department will prosecute him. Hillary Clinton and Hunter Biden did a great deal, but none of it matters to corrupt officials who share their worldview.

The lesson is clear: in America today, in the corrupt kleptocracy of Joe Biden, you have to have the right opinions. Then all doors will open for you and you can even break laws with impunity, and have no fear of prosecution. But if you dare to dissent from the opinions of the elites, prepare to be hounded by the new super-IRS and the weaponized FBI, and you’ll face raids, and prison, and who knows what else is coming.

Many conservatives are saying that this ensures Trump’s victory in 2024. But what makes them think that this corrupt regime will allow the man whom they fear and hate above all others return to the White House? It’s clear now. They will stop at nothing.

This is no longer a republic, except of the banana variety. It may be a republic again someday, but for now, the great American experiment is over. Born July 4, 1776 in Philadelphia, died August 8, 2022, in Mar-A-Lago, at the hands of Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, and Christopher Wray.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“If you control the food supply, you control everything,”
The UN envisions a global command economy

Robert W Malone MD, MS
31 min ago



I spent the afternoon reading the UN’s 2030 agenda, with its 17 goals and 169 targets. This is an agenda that the UN has been working towards building since 1992 -

Frankly, it was terrifying. My take away thought was that once you strip the unicons and butterflies out of the text, this unilateral consensus document reads like an updated communist manifesto .

This is particularly relevant because while the Agenda 2030 is a not a legally binding instrument, but the regional and international human rights Conventions and Covenants at the core of Agenda 2030 are, in fact, binding instruments of international law. So, for now - we can insist that our politicians fight against the more draconian aspects of agenda 2030.

Now, at first glance -most of the 169 targets of Agenda 21 are rather “fuzzy.” but extremely naive objectives. They are the goals of a command economy government, not an organization for world peace! Frankly, they are the goals of a failed governmental model. A model that has been tried again and again.
Definition: A command economy is a system in which a central government makes all economic decisions. Either the government or a collective owns the land and the means of production.
But let’s go back a step to the beginning of the United Nations (UN). After World War II, the UN was developed by a number of nations to end wars and maintain world peace. Slowly, over time, 193 nations have become members.

It has morphed into a leviathan organization; with tentacles that reach into all member nations. Its various agreements and goals have dictates regarding the economy, health, poverty, migration, “reproductive “ health, monetary systems, digital IDs, environmental controls, control of agricultural markets, universal living wage worldwide, governmental systems, etc.

The UN has partnerships and strategic agreements with member nations, 100s of non-governmental organizations -like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum. It has developed many offspring organizations, such as UNESCO and the World Health Organization.

The UN has signed strategic agreements with all of the major organizations and world powers to fulfill a utopian vision of the world that includes a global governing power that will ensure no poverty, no discrimination, universal healthcare and reproductive care, no dirty energy, no unequal food distribution, a living wage and a reversal of climate change by UN intervention on member nations. Basically a new world order- with unelected officials in control.

It no longer is enough to work for world peace, they now are fulfilling the role of a globalized government. It has many, many signed treaties signers and strategic agreements with its member nations. These agreements include statements that governments will not do anything that would go against the United Nations 2030 agenda. That includes “equity” for all. That is, a universal living wage.

Honestly, one has to wonder what was the US Government thinking when it signed these agreements? It is as if the US Government just decided to turn over sovereignty to the United Nations!

But don’t just take my word for it – instead lets take direct quotes from their 169 targets in their newest and biggest initiative “Agenda 2030:”

Remember - these targets are to be on a GLOBAL level by 2030 and member nations are to ensure that these goals are not thwarted. These are just a few of the goals found in Agenda 2030 and they do not cover other strategic agreements signed by UN member nations:

The list of 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 Targets
  • Ensure significant mobilization of resources from a variety of sources, including through enhanced development cooperation, in order to provide adequate and predictable means for developing countries, in particular least developed countries, to implement programmes and policies to end poverty in all its dimensions.
  • Create sound policy frameworks at the national, regional and international levels, based on pro-poor and gender-sensitive development strategies, to support accelerated investment in poverty eradication actions protection due to conflict
  • Correct and prevent trade restrictions and distortions in world agricultural markets, including through the parallel elimination of all forms of agricultural export subsidies and all export measures with equivalent effect, in accordance with the mandate of the Doha Development Round
  • Adopt measures to ensure the proper functioning of food commodity markets and their derivatives and facilitate timely access to market information, including on food reserves, in order to help limit extreme food price volatility.
  • By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services, including for family planning, information and education, and the integration of reproductive health into national strategies and programmes
  • Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all
  • Support the research and development of vaccines and medicines for the communicable and noncommunicable diseases that primarily affect developing countries, provide access to affordable essential medicines and vaccines, in accordance with the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, which affirms the right of developing countries to use to the full the provisions in the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights regarding flexibilities to protect public health, and, in particular, provide access to medicines for all
  • By 2030, ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality primary and secondary education leading to relevant and Goal-4 effective learning outcomes
  • By 2030, ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational and tertiary education, including university
  • By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development
  • Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights as agreed in accordance with the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development and the Beijing Platform for Action and the outcome documents of their review conferences
  • By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value (my note - yes, this means a command economy -ergo communism).
  • Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies and action in this regard
  • Adopt policies, especially fiscal, wage and social protection policies, and progressively achieve greater equality
  • Improve the regulation and monitoring of global financial markets and institutions and strengthen the implementation of such regulations
  • Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies
  • By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums
  • By 2030, provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all, improving road safety, notably by expanding public transport, with special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, women, children, persons with disabilities and older persons
  • By 2030, enhance inclusive and sustainable urbanization and capacity for participatory, integrated and sustainable human settlement planning and management in all countries
  • Support positive economic, social and environmental links between urban, peri-urban and rural areas by strengthening national and regional development planning
  • By 2030, substantially increase the number of cities and human settlements adopting and implementing integrated policies and plans towards inclusion, resource efficiency, mitigation and adaptation to climate change,
  • Rationalize inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption by removing market distortions, in accordance with national circumstances, including by restructuring taxation and phasing out those harmful subsidies, where they exist, to reflect their environmental impacts, taking fully into account the specific needs and conditions of developing countries and minimizing the possible adverse impacts on their development in a manner that protects the poor and the affected communities
  • Developed countries to implement fully their official development assistance commitments, including the commitment by many developed countries to achieve the target of 0.7 per cent of ODA/GNI to developing countries and 0.15 to 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to least developed countries ODA providers are encouraged to consider setting a target to provide at least 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to least developed countries
  • Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels
  • Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels
  • Broaden and strengthen the participation of developing countries in the institutions of global governance
  • By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration
Now, many of the above are legitimate goals - BUT for a nation, not as a world governance.

The UN has overstepped.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels

Offshore Drilling Is Coming Back With A Bang

Authored by Alex Kimani via OilPrice.com,

It looks like the offshore oil and gas drilling market is in the early innings of an upcycle in investment and activity.

Both Schlumberger and Transocean believe that the upcoming cycle will outpace the 2016-2019 cycle of investment and FID activity.

Demand for offshore vessels and rigs is climbing, with most new rig contracts being fixed at day rates that are higher than their prior contracts.

After years of uncertainty and stagnation, the offshore drilling market is on the rebound and is in the early innings of an upcycle in investment and activity that will outpace the 2016-2019 cycle, major services and rig providers say. Analysts and top offshore drilling executives say that offshore rig utilization and day rates are also rising in a market that is expected to tighten going forward.

In one of the latest outlooks on global offshore drilling, contractor giant Transocean says that the market is recovering, with momentum accelerating.

"While the past eight years have been extremely challenging for the entire industry, it is clear that the recovery in offshore drilling is underway, as contracting activity, utilization rates for high-specification ultra-deepwater and harsh-environment assets, and dayrates all continue to rise," Transocean CEO Jeremy Thigpen said last week, commenting on the company's Q2 performance.

"And, with a backdrop of hydrocarbon supply challenges, we are increasingly encouraged that this momentum could continue for the foreseeable future," Thigpen added.

As the world continues to consume a lot of oil and gas and many governments are prioritizing energy security to an accelerated energy transition after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the offshore drilling activity is set for an upturn.

"We believe the case is clear that E&P companies will continue to engage in exploration and development work to meet worldwide demand and replenish diminishing reserves. This is especially true in the offshore basins requiring our assets and services where recoverable reserve levels are high and carbon intensity is relatively low," Transocean's Thigpen said on the earnings call.

"With sustained constructive commodity prices, the economics of offshore projects remain compelling for continued development," the executive added.

The company sees a rapid tightening of the offshore market for high capability drilling assets in various regions with committed drillship utilization remaining above 90%, and further tightening is on the horizon, Thigpen said.

Last month, the world's largest oilfield services provider, Schlumberger, expressed a similarly optimistic view on offshore oil and gas drilling.

"The outlook for 2022, 2025 on offshore investments and FID activity will outpace visibly at 2016-2019 cycle. So we have early innings of this offshore cycle, but it's quite interesting," Schlumberger's CEO Olivier Le Peuch said on the earnings call in July.

"We see also offshore, the return of offshore being a characteristic that will only expand going forward. If you were to just look at the -- in terms of numbers, the number of jack-up big operating in shallow waters is actually on par higher than it has been for the previous cycles, more than 300, and deepwater is starting to catch up," Le Peuch added.

The market for offshore vessels and rigs sees utilization on the rise, followed by day rates, "finally allowing a market that has been in distress for many years to reap the benefits of the hard work that has been put down in the interim," Oddmund Føre, Senior Vice President, Energy Service Research, at Rystad Energy said in June.

"After a turbulent 2020-21 period denominated by the Covid-19 pandemic, the erosion of oil demand and a crash in oil prices, the offshore O&G sector is prime for a flurry of investment to make up for limited spending over the last few years," Mark Adeosun, Manager – Offshore Energy Services, at Westwood Global Energy Group, wrote in an insight on contractor spending offshore over the next few years.

According to Westwood, rig utilization is trending higher, and more currently inactive units are set to enter the offshore vessel fleet, says Teresa Wilkie, Research Director of Westwood's rig market intelligence service RigLogix.

"For the first time in several years, due to this increasing committed utilisation, most new rig contracts are being fixed at dayrates that are higher than their prior contracts – another indicator of a tightening rig market," Wilkie noted.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Plunge In Gas Prices Sparks Surge In Real Spending, But Low-Income Consumers Remain Stressed

TUESDAY, AUG 09, 2022 - 11:30 AM

In the aftermath of the recent plunge in gas prices, which has pulled the national average price to just above $4.00, two months after hitting an all time high north of $5.00, traders have been curious to see how retail spending will be impacted by this welcome development. And while the official data will be published next Wednesday, today we got an early glimpse thanks to the latest BofA card spending data which measures aggregated BofA credit and debit card data, and which was up 5.3% year-over-year (yoy) on a per household (HH) basis in July.



To be sure, the July number was artificially inflated in part by Prime Day and related promotions, which occurred in June last year. Which is why on an adjusted basis, July card spending per HH fell 0.2% month-over-month. It's also why BofA's economists forecast a 0.2% mom decrease in the Census Bureau’s July retail sales ex-autos figure, well below consensus of a +0.2% print.



But in a favorable twist, July's ostensible weakness was partly due to the plunge in gas prices, which led to a 5.8% mom drop in gas spending



According to BofA calculations, the share of gas in retail card spending ex autos fell by 0.7%, the largest single-month decline since April 2020



This has given consumers leeway to spend in other categories, and BofA expects a 0.9% mom increase in the Census Bureau’s core control retail sales print (retail sales ex autos gas, building materials and restaurants). And since the bank is forecasting soft headline inflation, it expects reported real (inflation-adjusted) consumer spending to rise sharply in July.

Digging deeper, BofA finds that the intra-month data show a broad increase in yoy spending growth in the latter part of July, particularly among lower-income households...



... where categories that benefited include clothing, restaurants and airlines.



According to BofA, "these trends bear watching – it remains to be seen whether they are driven primarily by lower gas prices or favorable base effects from last year’s Delta variant wave (which continued through Labor Day)." Meanwhile, the share of retail brick and mortar (B&M) spending outside households’ Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and in foreign countries remains well above pre-pandemic levels.



This suggests that the boom in summer vacation spending continues.
How about continued signs of stress among lower-income households, an ominous development highlighted recently by the like of Walmart? According to BofA, the share of credit cards in total card spending is only up slightly relative to last year, and is below the pre-pandemic share for all but the top income cohort.



This suggests that on average, liquidity constraints have not made lower-income HHs significantly more reliant on credit. Moreover, discretionary spending has held up quite well among lower-income households over the last several months



Putting it all together, especially in the context of the recent US slide into a technical recession when two weeks ago 2Q GDP growth came in negative at -0.9% for the 2nd quarter in a row, BofA writes that "last Friday’s very strong jobs report went a long way towards allaying recession fears" and adds that "if the signal from the BAC card data is accurate, we are now probably looking at a solid start to economic activity in 3Q" and while the bank still expects a recession to start by year-end, it thinks "the risks are skewed towards a delay of a few months" which would give the Fed more room to tighten policy (before having to unwind it all), and is why BofA raised its forecast of the terminal fed funds range by 25bp to 3.50-3.75% after the July jobs report, warning that "risks to the view are still to the upside."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Trump Tells Americans to Brace for ‘A Lot Worse’ Than Recession, Says Only One Thing Can Fix It

By Tom Ozimek
August 8, 2022 Updated: August 8, 202

Former President Donald Trump has warned Americans to brace for something “a lot worse than a recession” while blaming the Biden administration’s poor stewardship of the economy for soaring inflation and denouncing the tax hikes in the latest Democrat spending bill.

Trump made the remarks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas on Saturday, where the former president raised the alarm on the state of the union.

“Our country is being shot. It’s being destroyed,” Trump told attendees, while touting his administration’s record on the economy and national security.
Trump spoke of “creating the most secure border in American history, record tax and regulation cuts, $1.87 gasoline, no inflation, low interest rates, record growth in real wages, record growth in our economy.”

Soaring Inflation, Recession
During Trump’s tenure, the highest the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation gauge came in at was 2.9 percent in July 2018, while in his final month in office, January 2021, inflation clocked in at 1.4 percent.

Under Biden, inflation has climbed steadily, soaring 9.1 percent year-over-year in June 2022, a figure not seen in more than 40 years.

In his speech, Trump drew a contrast with the economy under President Joe Biden, blaming the president for the highest inflation in decades that Trump estimates is costing American families as much as $7,000 a year.

“After the pandemic, we handed the radical Democrats the fastest economic recovery ever recorded, the history of our country, ever recorded,” Trump continued. “They’ve turned that into two straight quarters of negative economic growth, also known, despite their protestation to the contrary, as a recession.”

Two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth are a common rule-of-thumb definition for a recession, although recessions in the United States are officially declared by a committee of economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) using a broader definition than the two-quarter rule.

Despite a number of economists arguing that the United States is in a recession based on the two-consecutive-quarters rule, the Biden administration insists that the economy isn’t in a recession, citing NBER’s consideration of a broader range of indicators.

A key argument against recession made by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and others in the Biden administration is that the U.S. labor market remains tight, with unemployment at 3.5 percent and, at 10.7 million, the number of job openings remaining well above the 6 million or so people classified as unemployed.

Worse Than Recession
In his CPAC speech, Trump then issued an ominous warning that, absent a course correction, the recession could spiral into something even worse.

“Just hope that the recession doesn’t turn into a depression, because the way they’re doing things, it could be a lot worse than a recession,” Trump said, echoing similar remarks he made at a rally in Arizona at the end of July, where he warned that “we’re going to have a serious problem” unless political change takes place.

“We got to get this act in order, we have to get this country going, or we’re going to have a serious problem,” Trump said at a rally in Arizona, warning that “we’re going to have a much bigger problem than recession. We’ll have a depression.”

During his appearance at CPAC, Trump issued a call for urgent action at the polls in the upcoming midterms.

“The future of our country is at stake. We don’t have time to wait years and years.

We won’t have a country left. What I used to say about Venezuela is true. We have to save the economy, defeat the Biden, Pelosi, Schumer tax hike, which is happening right now tonight,” Trump continued, referring to the so-called “Inflation Reduction Act” that cleared the Senate not long after his speech.

Senators passed the sweeping bill, estimated at $740 billion, in a 51–50 vote on Aug. 7, with the package next going to the House for consideration.

During the deliberations, Senate Democrats rejected an amendment offered by Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) that sought to ban any of the $80 billion for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from being used to target Americans making less than $400,000 per year.

“My colleagues claim this massive funding boost will allow the IRS to go after millionaires, billionaires and so-called rich ‘tax cheats,’ but the reality is a significant portion raised from their IRS funding bloat would come from taxpayers with income below $400,000,” Crapo said in a statement.

Crapo’s amendment was rejected on a party-line vote, with the Democrat bill including softer language that features a non-binding statement of intention not to squeeze more revenue from America’s middle class.

Tax Hikes
According to an analysis by Americans for Tax Reform, a U.S. advocacy group, the spending bill includes a number of tax hikes on American households and businesses.

This includes a $6.5 billion natural gas tax that ATR says will increase household energy bills, a $12 billion crude oil tax that will end up being passed on to drivers in the form of higher gas prices, and a $52 billion income tax hike on mid-sized and family businesses.

In a separate analysis, ATR said that the Democrat bill’s changes to the book tax threaten small businesses.

Elaborating on that theme, economist and author Antonio Graceffo wrote in an op-ed for The Epoch Times that the so-called “Inflation Reduction Act” would drive up prices for American households.

“Nearly half of these new taxes will be paid by manufacturers, creating disincentives to produce. Diminished industrial output will drive up the cost of goods and reduce the variety and quantity of goods available on store shelves,” Graceffo wrote.

“Beyond the manufacturing sector, the act increases taxes on businesses in general, which, combined with higher interest rates will decrease new investment and hamper job creation. Ultimately, these increased costs will be passed on to customers,” he added.

‘We Have to Win’
During his CPAC speech, Trump revealed what he sees as the key to bringing the country and its economy back on track.

“We have to win an earth-shattering victory in 2022. We have to do it, coming up in November,” Trump said.

“This election needs to be a national referendum on the horrendous catastrophes the radical Democrats have inflicted on our country,” he continued.

“The Republican party needs to campaign on a clear pledge that, if they are given power, they’re going to fight with everything they have to shut down the border, stop the crime wave, beat inflation, and hold the Biden administration accountable. They have to hold it accountable. Job number one for the next Congress,” Trump said.

The national midterm election takes place on Nov. 8, with 34 Senate seats and all 435 House seats up for grabs.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Cuba)

Cuba's Largest Thermoelectric Power Plant Offline Amid Depot Blaze

TUESDAY, AUG 09, 2022 - 02:05 PM

Cash-strapped Cuba was forced to take its largest thermoelectric power plant offline due to a multi-day blaze at a fuel depot in the northern part of the country.

Bloomberg reported the Ministry of Energy and Mines said the 200 MW Antonio Guiteras thermo plant was disconnected from the grid because of a water shortage. A local media outlet said the fire at the nearby Matanzas industrial storage complex had used up the water delivery to the power plant as firefighters battled the blaze, affecting four of the facility's eight storage tanks.

We noted Monday that the communist country's worst fear about the 2.4-million-barrel Matanzas terminal would be realized if the thermo power plant was shuttered. That's because its generators, fed by heavy crude oil from the Matanzas complex, provide a fifth of the country's power needs. It remains to be seen if crude flows from the damaged storage facility to the power plant have been affected.

View: https://twitter.com/JhonSG1990/status/1556797910439919617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1556803149767348227%7Ctwgr%5E68878bc8003e0e24d178bb1b80ebac4a648ecb95%7Ctwcon%5Es3_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fcommodities%2Fcubas-largest-thermoelectric-power-plant-offline-amid-depot-blaze .28 min

This disaster comes as power grid failures have been rampant due to fuel shortages, forcing grid operators to impose widespread energy blackouts in some areas of the country for up to 12 hours since May.

]The Union of Electrical Workers said the new power failure indicates only half the island's 3,000 MW peak energy demand can be met on Monday. About 1,223 MW of generation is offline.

Cuba struggled to keep the lights on even before the fuel depot fire amid power plant breakdowns and fuel shortages. Rolling blackouts have sparked protests. Compound the risk of more power blackouts with annual inflation soaring to 29% in June, and it's a perfect recipe for more social unrest.

The fire at the fuel depot has exposed a critical bottleneck. Matanzas is Cuba's only terminal that can handle fuel shipments from large crude tankers piped to power plants across the country.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

2023 Farmer Returns Projected at $25 Per Acre, 80% Lower than 2022

By SARA SCHAFER August 9, 2022

Be ready for a big profit swing for 2023 — to the downside. The first round of 2023 Illinois Crop Budgets released by the University of Illinois show a clear trend of higher costs and lower returns.

Farmer Returns - University of Illinois


The 2023 crop budgets are based on projected input cost levels, trendline corn and soybean yields and per-bushel prices of $5.30 for corn and $12.75 for soybeans. The budgets are for four regions of Illinois (northern Illinois, central Illinois with high-productivity farmland, central Illinois with low-productivity farmland and southern Illinois).

Farmers Face Cost Increases
The models point to substantial cost increases in 2023, says Gary Schnitkey, University of Illinois Extension ag economist.

“The factors that are causing those cost increases are inflation, including wages and labor, fuel and just general supply disruptions further exasperated by the Ukrainian Russian war,” he says.

Non-land costs are projected to be higher in 2023 than in 2022, as is illustrated for corn grown in northern Illinois in Figure 1. Non-land costs are projected to be $860 in 2023, up from $758 in 2022. Overall, costs have increased dramatically since 2020, from $577 to $860, an increase of $283 per acre, or a 49% increase.


2023 Production Costs - University of Illinois


In northern Illinois, cash rents are projected to increase from $296 per acre up to $301 per acre.

In 2023, total costs are projected at $1,161 per acre, up from the $1,054 level in 2022, Schnitkey says. Since 2020, total costs have increased from $833 per acre to $1,161, an increase of $328 per acre, or 39%.

Table 2 shows actual results for northern Illinois for 2021, along with projections for 2022 and 2023.

2023 Production Costs - University of Illinois


Given higher costs, break-even levels for northern Illinois for corn are $5.34 per bushel on cash rented land. The break-even soybean price is $12.54. Those break-even prices are above average prices received from 2014 to 2019 ($3.66 per bushel for corn and $9.69 for soybeans).

“For central Illinois high-productivity farmland, we are projecting an average return of $25 per acre for a corn-soybean rotation,” Schnitkey says. “That is much lower than the return in 2021 when we had a record $413 per acre, and it is also above 2022 projections for returns of $156 per acre.”

The 2023 farmer return is projected to be close to the average from 2013 to 2019 when the return averaged $29 per acre.

“This typically happens in agriculture after a period of higher returns, we return to those lower returns,” he says. “We're still protecting positive returns for 2023 but there are risks. The biggest is that corn and soybean prices decline, and costs do not-- an event that could happen.”

Watch this video with Gary Schnitkey, University of Illinois ag economist:

View: https://youtu.be/6Wdo4GTr4UQ
4:40 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

John Phipps: Is There a Shortage of DEF Right Now?

video on website 3:08 min

By U.S. FARM REPORT August 8, 2022

Around last May, Facebook posts began circulating regarding an impending shortage of diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) due to various sinister reasons. DEF is required to be sprayed into diesel exhaust to neutralize nitrous oxides and filter particulate matter.

DEF is a mixture of urea and water, so the same factors such as natural gas prices that clobbered farmer fertilizer budgets also made DEF occasionally scarcer and much more expensive. The speed with which the economy roared back to life also caught suppliers off guard.

Remember the Great Trucker Shortage that promised impending doom, and then seemed to fade away. Snopes, the premier online fact-checker disassembled the DEF rumor, and my comments come largely from that source.

The DEF shortage story centered on the largest users of DEF – truckers. In what has become a familiar pattern sequential supply chain problems are mentioned to present a plausible probability of a crippling DEF shortage about now. Perhaps it is harder to get in places, but our supplier, a huge coop not only filled our tank when we called, the salesman had heard nothing of any supply issues.

The rumor of rail problems, specifically the Union Pacific and their dispute with the largest truck stop operator – Pilot Flying J – were at the core of this predicted shortage. Supply issues did happen briefly in Australia and Korea but did not become a persistent problem.

While it is often mentioned we are the largest importer of urea, we manufacture most of what we need at home and import about a fourth of our needs.

Unfortunately, truly unimagined supply and production problems have come to pass thanks to the pandemic and Ukraine war, so users may be applying the old tactic of getting while the getting is good. This exacerbates any distribution issues, of course.

Note our tote is full, for example. An interesting side note is totes themselves are harder to find, and the days of your supplier providing one free are probably over. We upgraded a 14-year-old combine and with only one other tractor new enough to need DEF, decided our usage required something other than messing with plastic barrels.

There is currently no widespread shortage of DEF I could find evidence of. It is the price of everything I’ve been talking about that will be the real heartburn, I think.

What other issues are on John's mind? You can read or watch both John's World and Customer Support segments from U.S. Farm Report online.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

What's Ag's Stake in the Senate-Passed Inflation Reduction Act?

By JENNA HOFFMAN August 8, 2022

It was a busy weekend on The Hill for the Senate as it voted on Sunday to pass the $740-billion Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

Proposed by Senate Democrats, the bill passed by a 51 to 50 vote after Democrats “successfully” blocked most of the 41 proposed amendments set forth by Republicans, according to Jim Wiesemeyer, ProFarmer policy analyst.
Politics aside, what does this reconciliation bill mean for ag?

BIOFUELS BIG DAY
$369 billion will be dedicated to energy programs, which includes biofuels.

Wiesemeyer says this funding was made possible by one man in particular.
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) upended Democrat-led reconciliation bills in the past due to their strict climate focus. Manchin turned his reconciliation bill “nay” to “yea” this round only after securing numerous biofuel provisions, including:

1. Funding for blender pump and biofuel infrastructure
2. A collective $3 billion for renewable energy projects in rural areas, including USDA’s Rural Energy for America Program
3. Rural electric cooperative direct pays that allow for renewable energy tax credits
4. Extension on the $1-a-gallon tax credit for biomass-based diesel through 2024
Regarding the diesel tax credit, Wiesemeyer says once the 2024 time is up, the IRA proposes the clean fuels tax credit would vary according to the biofuel’s carbon rating.

“A temporary $1.25 per gallon tax credit would be created for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) to serve as a bridge to the implementation of the clean fuels credit in 2025,” he wrote. “The new clean fuels credit would be in effect through 2027.”

However, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) doesn’t feel SAF provision will do much, according to Wiesemeyer.

“The CBO scored that tax provision for the SAF at only $49 million, and it lasts for only two years exclusively for SAF,” Wiesemeyer told AgriTalk Host Chip Flory. “CBO clearly doesn’t think a lot of this provision.”

FARM DEBT
According to USDA’s 2022 Farm Sector Income Forecast released in February, the U.S. farm sector’s debt will increase 3% this year to nearly $13 billion.

The IRA looks to combat this issue by delivering a $5.3 billion farm debt relief package. The provision will offer:
• $3.1 billion to “distressed” borrowers who hold direct or guaranteed farm loans
• $2.2 billion in payments to farmers who experienced discrimination in USDA loan programs

Wiesemeyer says farm debt payments will cap at $500,000 per producer, with the price tag paid by reinstating a debt relief program that was previously enabled through the American Rescue Plan in 2021 and later stopped in U.S. courts.

“We won’t know a lot of the answers on this until USDA comes up with a way to implement it,” Wiesemeyer told Flory. “They have to file their proposed regulations in the Federal Register, likely for public comments, so we’ve got a way to go on this.”

CONSERVATION
Climate and conservation are threaded together in the IRA to deliver $18 billion in four conservation programs:

• Environmental Quality Incentives Program - $8.45 billion
• Regional Conservation Partnership Program - $4.95 billion
• Conservation Stewardship Program - $3.25 billion
• Agricultural Conservation Easement Program - $1.4 billion

With the USDA’s implementation of these programs, Wiesemeyer is told the Agency will “mitigate or address” ag’s climate contributions.

John Block, senior policy advisor at Olsson, Frank, and Weeda law firm says USDA will also be tasked with measuring the impact ag has on total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions while advocating for the use of green farming practices, like cover crops and carbon sequestration, among others.

Outside of program funding, another provision added $4 billion to fight drought in the West. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) says she pushed this last-minute legislation to address an ongoing issue in her area.

CUTTING FARM COSTS
IRA’s passage might cut on-farm energy costs through efficiency upgrades, according to Wiesemeyer.

“Another provision extends a program that allows households that are installing solar or battery storage systems to deduct 30% of the cost of those projects from their taxes,” he says.

The same 30% tax reduction applies to heat pump and insulation improvements outlined in a separate provision.

If the IRA is signed into law, the Rhodium Group estimates U.S. households would save $170 to $200 per year due to energy costs dropping 5% to 7%.

HOW WILL THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT BE FUNDED?
The tax portion of the IRA is estimated to deliver roughly $739 billion to the government, which covers the $740 billion IRA price tag. Block says the funds will be sourced by imposing a 15% corporate minimum tax.

Block isn’t excited at the idea of spending more money, as he worries it will “pour fuel on the inflation fire” that the government is trying to put out.

“I’m not against taxing some of the biggest corporations that seem to always find a loophole to avoid taxes,” he wrote. “A $739 billion bill is a lot of money. It will be very difficult to get it passed.”

The House is gearing up to return from their summer recess on Friday to vote on Senate-passed the IRA. Wiesemeyer anticipates the House will pass the bill.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Economic Reduction & Inflation Expansion – Everything's Out-Of-Stock & Nothing Is Cheaper

Authored by Tom Luongo via Gold, Goats, 'n Guns blog,
“I was into pain reduction and mind expansion, but what I’ve ended up with is pain expansion and mind reduction. Everything hurts now, and nothing makes sense.
- CARRIE FISHER, POSTCARDS FROM THE EDGE
So, Davos finally got the mini-me version of Build Back Better through a deeply divided Senate over the weekend. It’s a terrible bill and will be a worse law, but at least it’s only about 12% of the original cost.

I guess it’s true what they say, the US must be broke, even new layers of tyranny are cut-rate at this point.

Whatever happened to dreaming big?

It’s all you can do now but to laugh, right? Nothing in D.C. is what it seems, like having lawmakers who work for Americans and the betterment of America. While this has been clear to me for what feels like my entire life, there is still real resistance to this concept.



No, folks, Chuck Schumer doesn’t work for you. He doesn’t work for Wall St. (except when the pay him) and he doesn’t work for the labor unions or anyone else. He works for globalists and foreign actors whose raison d’etre is the destruction of your life and your family’s future.

That’s what this bill is intended and will do when finally enacted.

I was asked by Sputnik News to comment on this last week and the article is now out in the world. The main point of this is the one I’ve been making for more than a year now about Build Back Better, as blackmail to the Fed:
“This bill is another lame attempt by Democrats to force the Fed to stop raising interest rates by saddling them with new spending which it would have to monetize, similar to last year’s Build Back Better,” argued financial and political commentator Tom Luongo.
“What this is is pure pre-midterm electioneering. The Democrats need something to campaign on.”
Thankfully it’s so small that a few billion in spending next year isn’t going to change much. But what will change is that the Democrats and their Davos paymasters have finally gotten two things they were desperate to saddle the U.S. economy with:
  1. 80,000 more IRS agents to increase tax compliance
  2. 15% effective minimum corporate tax rate
Davos’ obsession is with tax normalization. They want everyone taxed like they tax the French and the Swedes.



And then they want 100% compliance through Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) where there is no escape from their 24/7/365 surveillance. The US needs to be brought in line to pay its ‘fair-share’ of the Climate Change crisis.

The sad truth is that too many people in this world actually believe this utter bullshit.

Beyond the creeping and creepy Marxism in all of this is the inherent problem with this model for a society. Innovation comes from capital fluidity and flexibility. It is the ability of people to adapt quickly to changes in their environment that leads to prosperity and growth, not distributing resources on an arbitrary definition of equality.

That system’s inherent tend towards entropy leads to where we are today, insane marginal tax rates subsidizing people who vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. To remind everyone, in Marxist-like reductionist terms, if there are only two classes of people, as Murray Rothbard pointed out, those two classes are tax payers and tax consumers. Once the system turns this predatory where it needs a majority of tax consumers to survive off the tax payers all productivity eventually stops, looting via corruption is maximized and the only ones making ‘bank’ are the enforcers and the ‘corpse-feeders.’

… until the whole engine of the economy stops cold. But, truly I’m not invoking Ayn Rand here.

The belief that we can push this dead whale of an idea, communism, much farther up the beach isn’t reaching critical breakout mass, it’s reaching its mathematical limit.

What’s clearly going on here is that the Democrats needed a win to go into the mid-terms with to shore up their base. At the same time GOP establishment was more than happy to ‘oppose’ it to fuel their election strategy and fundraising while vowing to try and repeal it (which they can’t) when they gain control of the country post mid-terms.

This bill will do nothing to alleviate shortages and supply chain disruptions caused by COVID lockdowns, Biden’s executive orders and ESG/DEI arm-twisting of companies to ‘get woke.’ While they’ve engineered a recession, you’d swear their allergy to saying the word would lead to summoning an Elder God because this is some Lovecraftian nightmare world.

Oh. Wait.

They’ll be happy to summon that image up after they can blame things on the GOP, at least that’s what Schumer is thinking. The issue is that you can’t solve cost-push inflation with raising interest rates. But, at the same time, have zero cost-of-capital in the US doesn’t fix anything that’s broken either.

So, after this brief interruption, while we have a bustlet after a massive boom in commodity prices, expect things to get worse for the average tax payer going forward as real-world inflation will continue while Pelosi, Schumer and the rest of the aliens on Capitol Hill assuring us they are still our friends, restrict our choices and make us feel guilty for still breathing.

The real solution is the one they will never contemplate — cutting taxes and regulation. No, the answer is never more freedom, it’s that we still have too much of it. And there is no changing that dynamic as long as our lawmakers are beholden to the control freaks who have already engineered a world where 75% marginal tax rates are not enough.

Stepping back from this particular issue, it’s incumbent to see it in the larger overall strategy of turning the US government even more into the enemy of the people in order to foment civil unrest, if not outright civil war, as a consequence for our unwillingness to eet ze bugz.

You know this is all just unsustainable commie claptrap when you see subsidies for rich people to buy $80,000 electric cars. We really are dealing with people who have no idea how capital formation works or why any of their perceived ‘successes’ were just them piggy-backing on trends that were already emergent in the market before they got involved.

My full answers to Sputnik’s questions are below the line:

Could this proposed plan help the US economy?
No. This bill is another lame attempt by Democrats to force the Fed to stop raising interest rates by saddling them with new spending which it would have to monetize, similar to last year’s Build Back Better.

What this is is pure pre-midterm electioneering. The Democrats need something to campaign on. The GOP will mostly allow it to progress to also have something to campaign against.

To what extent would the additional flow of money help tackle inflation?
It won’t. It will do the opposite, obviously. There is no need for this bill. What is needed is for Congress to stop spending money it doesn’t have on programs the US doesn’t need. Moreover, Schumer is lying about who will pay for this. They want to tax the rich to play to their base, nothing more.

But raising taxes in a recession is a recipe for making the recession worse, not better. And no amount of jawboning will change that.

How could this proposed plan worsen the recession?
You cannot tax your way to prosperity. Period. Closing the carried interest ‘loophole,’ for example makes for good rhetoric but it just means that that money will flee the US and find a home somewhere else. Capital flows to where it is treated best, so if you raise the tax rate on one class of people and they move the money out of the country then you are left with the spending mandated but without the revenue you thought you’d generate.

More spending, less taxes equals the burdens being placed on those left to pay the bills. They always sell this idea with every one of these bills and it never works out.

The best way to raise tax revenue is to lower taxes, remove the roadblocks to growth and allow the market to find new efficiencies to drive costs down, not subsidize prices, be they prescription drugs or anything else.

The White House is continuously saying that the US economy is good and that there is no recession; what is your prognosis with regard to this? What do the facts and numbers tell us?

If the economy is so good, why do we need this bill? The answer is we don’t. So, the White House messaging is already confused.

The US needs a reorganization of how capital is handled domestically.

Recessions are a reflection of the need for that reorganization through the liquidation of uneconomic spending.

Spending growth is attenuating because high food and energy prices are squeezing household budgets. As opposed to handing out free money printed out of thin air, creating a bigger debt burden for the future, they should be lifting the controls currently in place creating the shortages leading to higher prices.

What is the way out of this crisis for the US, and is the US government doing enough to tackle the problems?
The way out of this situation for the US is to raise the cost of capital, which the Fed is doing through raising interest rates and force fiscal discipline on Congress by curbing their ability to run deficits while simultaneously lowering taxes at all levels especially on small businesses and wealth preservation.

This means an ideological shift away from the technocratic ideal that we can socially engineer a better society through the tax code. We’ve tried this all across the West. It has failed and led to where we are today.

The problem isn’t that the government isn’t doing enough it is that the government is doing orders of magnitude too much already. The Democrats (and their international backers) understand that the mid-terms are a referendum on this idea and are trying to hold onto what they can by giving people free money. Same as it ever was.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou6SRDU6upA
32:25 min

Judge Who Signed FBI Raid On Trump Linked To EPSTEIN In SHOCKING Development, Civil War Trending


Tim Pool


Judge Who Signed FBI Raid On Trump Linked To EPSTEIN In SHOCKING Development, Civil War Trending. National Divorce trends on Twitter as FBI raid sparks fear of US civil war. The Judge who signed off the search warrant of Trump's Mar-a-lago home previously represented Epstein's lieutenants in a shocking development. Trump was accused of taking classified documents to his home in violation of federal law. As theories run rampant many speculate about the deep state and Democrats plans against Trump to prevent him from running in 2024
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuFPczV6ezs
11:03 min

@Glenn Beck Reacts to FBI Raid of Trump Home: A ‘MASSIVE MOVE’

Aug 9, 2022


BlazeTV


If you're celebrating this FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, you have no idea how much this changes things. We don't do this in America. At least, we didn't. But the Left CANNOT have Donald Trump be president again. His 'America First' platform goes against everything they've been working for. So, what's their endgame here? Because there's only ONE that makes since to me, and it should scare us all.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-SNXIHdVAQ
10:30 min

Media Says You Think Inflation Is Going Down As Inflation Reduction Act Will Change That


The Economic Ninja


Media Says You Think Inflation Is Going Down As Inflation Reduction Act Will Change That. When will inflation go down? That is what most people ask as they wonder how Biden inflation will affect supermarket inflation and gas prices as they keep rising. https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.o...

^^^
Consumers expect inflation to slow down, a big win for the Fed
PUBLISHED MON, AUG 8 2022 11:00 AM EDTUPDATED MON, AUG 8 2022 10:14 PM EDT

Jeff Cox

KEY POINTS
  • A New York Fed survey showed that respondents in July expected inflation to run at a 6.2% pace over the next year and a 3.2% rate for the next three years.
  • That marks a big drop-off from the respective 6.8% and 3.6% results from the June survey.
  • Expectations for food increases fell at the fastest rate in survey history and the second-fastest for gasoline prices.
The consumer outlook for inflation decreased significantly in July amid a sharp drop in gas prices and a growing belief that the rapid surges in food and housing also would ebb in the future.

The New York Federal Reserve's monthly Survey of Consumer Expectations showed that respondents expect inflation to run at a 6.2% pace over the next year and a 3.2% rate for the next three years.

While those numbers are still very high by historical standards, they mark a big drop-off from the respective 6.8% and 3.6% results from the June survey.

Through June, food prices rose 10.4% over the past year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They are still expected to climb 6.7% over the next 12 months, but that's a decline from the June survey of 2.5 percentage points, the biggest fall in a data series going back to June 2013.

Likewise, respondents see gas prices, which rose 60% over the past year, increasing at just a 1.5% pace over the next year, a slide of 4.2 percentage points from June, the second-biggest monthly decline in the survey's history.

The price of regular gas has come down about 67 cents a gallon over the past month though it remains 87 cents higher than a year ago, according to AAA. Commodity prices overall have been falling significantly as well.

Finally, home prices are expected to rise 3.5% from June's 4.4%, the lowest projected gain since November 2020.

Five-year inflation expectations also slipped, dropping 0.5 percentage point to 2.3%.

The results come as the Fed has been raising interest rates aggressively to bring down inflation running at its highest level in more than 40 years. The central bank in 2022 has hiked benchmark rates four times for a total of 2.25 percentage points, and market pricing indicates a third consecutive 0.75 percentage point increase in September, according to CME Group data.

However, the New York Fed results from July might give policymakers reason to pull back if not in September then later in the year if the inflation data cooperates. The Fed targets inflation at 2% over the long run, so the projected levels in the survey remain well above the central bank's comfort level.

Over the weekend, Fed Governor Michelle Bowman said she doesn't expect inflation to come down anytime soon and sees a need to keep pushing rates higher. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly echoed those sentiments, saying the increases are "far from done."

Those comments came after the BLS on Friday reported much higher numbers for payroll growth — 528,000 — and wages, with average hourly earnings jumping 5.2%.

The New York Fed survey also showed that overall household spending growth for the next year is expected to cool to 6.9%. That's also a comparatively high number over the longer run but well below the record-high 9% result from May.

The 1.5 percentage point monthly decline is the largest in the survey's history.

Consumers also grew slightly more optimistic on stock prices during a month that saw the S&P 500 soar 9%, with 34.3% now expecting higher prices over the next 12 months.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGenHvXXxrg
46:03 min

Food Systems in Crisis: A Roadmap for Action | Davos | #WEF22

Aug 9, 2022


World Economic Forum


The Ukraine-Russia war has piled pressure on global food systems in addition to the impact of climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic on food supply chains. What can be done to mitigate the impact of the food security and price crisis and build more resilient food systems for the long term? The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.

The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. We believe that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive change.
 

Cacheman

Ultra MAGA!

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Climate Activists Slam Fossil Fuel Concessions In Senate Dems’ Climate Bill

(Photo by Shannon Finney/Getty Images for Green New Deal Network)
Daily Caller News Foundation logo


JACK MCEVOYENERGY REPORTER
August 09, 20223:16 PM ET

Environmental groups are condemning fossil fuel provisions in the Senate Democrats’ $369 billion climate spending package that will work to slash the nation’s carbon emissions and invest billions of taxpayer dollars in the green energy industry, according to statements released by climate activists.

Democrats were compelled to include provisions in the bill, dubbed the Inflation Reduction Act, that will allow for the drilling of oil and gas on more federal lands in order to get Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia’s crucial vote in the Senate. However, the Center For Biological Diversity and Greenpeace were enraged by the bill’s support for certain fossil fuel policies, arguing that the concessions to the oil and gas industries will hurt the climate, according to press releases.

“This is a climate suicide pact,” said Brett Hartl, government affairs director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “The new leasing required in this bill will fan the flames of the climate disasters torching our country, and it’s a slap in the face to the communities fighting to protect themselves from filthy fossil fuels.”

The bill allows drilling and pipeline arrangements in Alaska, Appalachia and the Gulf Coast. Moreover, a companion bill to the spending package, passed on Friday, will reinstate Trump-era permitting reforms to expedite fossil fuel projects. The plan would mandate that before any new solar or wind energy is installed, the Interior Department must provide at least 2 million acres of public lands and 60 million acres of offshore waters for oil and gas leasing each year for a decade.

No utility-scale renewable energy project on public lands or waters could be allowed if the government didn’t offer these minimal amounts for lease. The lease amount must be offered for a minimum of ten years under the act, meaning that more than 600 million acres of offshore leasing could result from the bill.

WASHINGTON, DC – AUGUST 7: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) gives the thumbs up as he leaves the Senate Chamber after passage of the Inflation Reduction Act at the U.S. Capitol August 7, 2022 in Washington, DC.

“The IRA is packed with giveaways to the fossil fuel executives who are destroying our planet,” said Greenpeace USA Co-Executive Director Ebony Twilley Martin.

Some of the climate actions in the spending package include methane taxes on oil companies and the revival of a long-expired Superfund 16.4 cents per barrel tax on crude oil and petroleum products, according to the bill’s text. The law generates around $25 billion in taxes over the next ten years by reintroducing the Superfund tax on crude oil received at refineries and on petroleum products imported into the country for consumption, use or storage.

Scientists estimate that the bill may help drive down carbon emissions by about 42% from 2005 levels by 2030, according to a report from the Princeton University-led REPEAT Project. The bill, which includes new tax provisions to pay for the historic $739 billion climate and health care spending package, has been hailed as a huge victory for both President Joe Biden and Senate Democrats.

Climate activists’ reactions to fossil fuel provisions in the bill come amid the Biden administration’s efforts to push through its ambitious climate agenda as well as elevated gas prices. Greenpeace also demanded that President Joe Biden declare a climate emergency in their statement.

The Center For Biological Diversity declined to comment on the matter. Greenpeace did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
 
Top