GOV/MIL Main "Great Reset" Thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Big Green Lie Almost Everyone Claims To Believe

Authored by Patricia Adams and Lawrence Solomon via The Epoch Times,

Almost every member of Congress, Democrat or Republican, pays homage to the Big Green Lie. So do all the past and remaining Conservative candidates vying to be prime minister of the UK and every candidate currently vying for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada. So does virtually all of the mainstream press. The Big Green Lie—that carbon dioxide is a pollutant—is so pervasive that even those considered skeptics—including right-wing NGOs and pundits—generally adhere to the orthodoxy, differing not in their stated belief that CO2 is a pollutant but only in how calamitous a pollutant it is.

Because everyone now participates in the CO2-emissions-are-bad lie, the debate over climate policy hasn’t been over whether a CO2 problem exists but over how urgently CO2 needs to be addressed, and how it should be addressed. Do we have eight years left before Armageddon becomes inevitable or decades? Do we get off fossil fuels by building nuclear plants or wind turbines? Should we change our lifestyles to need less of everything? Or should we mitigate this evil—the view of those deemed climate minimalists—by shielding our continents from a rising of the oceans by enclosing them behind sea walls?

With almost everyone across the political spectrum publicly agreeing that curbing CO2 is a good thing, the debate has been between those who want to do good quickly by reaching Net Zero in 2040 and sticks in the mud who want to slow down the doing of a good thing. With discourse careening down rabbit holes, almost everyone gets lost pursuing solutions to Alice-in-Wonderland delusions—and wasting trillions of dollars in the process.

Until the 2000s, when climate change was still called global warming and the mainstream media still noticed that none of the myriad predictions of a climate catastrophe were being borne out—the polar caps weren’t melting, Manhattan wasn’t about to be submerged, malaria wasn’t infecting the northern hemisphere—many exposed man-made climate change as a hoax. The leaked Climategate emails revealed how scientists had conspired to “hide the decline” in temperatures that didn’t conform to their models. The claim that 97 percent of scientists supported the global warming theory was exposed as a fraud, as was the claim that the 4,000 scientists associated with the IPCC endorsed its report—those 4,000 hadn’t endorsed it, and most hadn’t even read it but had merely reviewed parts of the report and often disagreed with what they read.

The claim that the “science was settled” on climate change never withstood scrutiny. Scientists around the world signed a series of petitions to dispute that claim. The 2008 Oregon Petition, spearheaded by a former president of the National Academy of Science and championed by Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein’s successor at Princeton and one of the world’s most preeminent scientists, was signed by more than 31,000 scientists and experts who agreed that “the proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. … Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

COP26 President Alok Sharma (C) speaks during the U.N. Climate Change Conference COP 26 in Glasgow, Scotland, on Nov. 13, 2021. (Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

What is settled is the abject failure of the three-decade-long attempt by the bureaucracies of the 195 countries of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to convince anyone other than themselves, a credulous media, and a relatively few gullible people that climate change represents an existential threat. Poll after poll over the decades show the public gives climate change short shrift when asked to rank its importance.

A Gallup Poll released this week, which asked Americans, “What do you think is the most important problem facing this country today?” found that climate change didn’t meet its criteria of the many issues worth listing. As Gallup noted, “Many parts of the nation have suffered record heat in recent weeks, and other regions have received record flooding. But a low 3% of Americans mention the weather, the environment or climate change as the nation’s top problem.” So, too, last month, where “just 1 percent of voters in a recent New York Times/Siena College poll named climate change as the most important issue facing the country …. Even among voters under 30, the group thought to be most energized by the issue, that figure was 3 percent.”

Although most elites continue to pay lip service to the urgency of curbing carbon dioxide, their actions belie their words, whether judged by their penchant for private jet travel or their disingenuous commitment to climate-related policies. According to an International Energy Agency (IEA) announcement last week, coal is once again king: Global coal demand this year will “match the annual record set in 2013, and coal demand is likely to increase further next year to a new all-time high.” The IEA’s assessment comports with a worldwide embrace of coal that includes the European Union, until recently the world’s most zealous climate scold. The EU is now walking back its Net Zero commitments.

In some countries, governments are not so much walking back climate policies as unabashedly kicking them out. Calling wind turbines “fans” that harm the environment and cause “visual pollution” without providing much energy, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said the government will end the subsidies and stop issuing permits for new wind projects. Israel is also set to pull the plug on the country’s wind industry, its environmental protection minister arguing that wind provides a “negligible contribution” to the country’s power system “compared to the potential for harm to nature, which is high.”

Recognizing renewables as economic and environmental boondoggles, as Mexico and Israel have done, is a step toward puncturing the lie that a fuel that emits carbon dioxide can be sensibly replaced. The other shoe to drop is the lie that carbon dioxide-emitting fuels should be replaced.

The fantastical claim that CO2 is a pollutant was cut out of whole cloth. The 2008 statement by the 31,000 experts—that “there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate” is as true today as it was then, and as it always has been. No scientist anywhere at any time has shown that manmade CO2 emissions—aka nature’s fertilizer—do any harm to anything.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Economic Slowdown Now, Recession Coming In 2023

SUNDAY, AUG 07, 2022 - 12:30 PM
Authored by Lance Roberts via The Epoch Times,

Economic slowdown but no recession! That message comes from the latest employment report, service sector data, and Federal Reserve.

“We’re not in a recession right now. We do have these two-quarters of negative GDP growth. To some extent, a recession is in the eyes of the beholder. With all the job growth in the first half of the year, it’s hard to say there’s a recession. With a flat unemployment rate at 3.6 percent, it’s hard to say there’s a recession,” stated James Bullard, St. Louis Federal Reserve president.

Such a statement certainly belies much of the economic consensus that two-quarters of negative economic growth constitutes a recession. As shown, the latest GDP report indeed met that measure.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

However, as stated, some indicators suggest the economy is in a slowdown but not yet in a recession. For example, our composite Institute of Supply Management (ISM) survey is still in expansionary territory. Since services make up about 80 percent of the economy today, there is currently support for economic growth. However, the data trend is negative and suggests the view of an economic slowdown.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

Employment also remains extremely strong. With the unemployment rate near historic lows, it suggests there is currently not a recession underway. However, historically low unemployment rates are pre-recessionary and reverse quickly as a recession takes hold.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

While neither measure suggests the economy has entered a recession yet, it does not preclude one from occurring. Many indicators suggest individuals “feel” like the economy is in a recession, such as our composite consumer sentiment index. Historically, a recessionary environment was present when consumer confidence and expectations declined below 80.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

Notably, given short-term economic dynamics, we could see a bump in economic growth owing to back-to-school spending in Q3 and holiday shopping in Q4.

However, I suspect that as the Fed continues its aggressive mission to combat inflationary pressures, a recession in 2023 is likely.

The Fed’s Dilemma
While James Bullard and others currently direct the monetary policy regime, suggesting they can quell inflation with only an economic slowdown, history suggests otherwise. The Fed makes its policy decisions based on lagging economic data.

For example, as noted previously, the Fed is currently basing its ability to continue hiking based on solid employment rates. However, history is clear that as the Federal Reserve hikes rates, there is a point where “something breaks” and low unemployment rates soar higher.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

That breaking point occurs because as the Federal Reserve hikes rates, the real-time economy adjusts to monetary policy changes. However, data such as employment and, importantly, inflation is comprised of data that can take several months to catch up to the actual economy.

Notably, more than 40 percent of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is Home Owners Equivalent Rent. It takes roughly three months for pricing changes to be accurately reflected in the data. As the Fed continues to hike rates to combat inflation, the actual impact on consumers and economic activity is not reflected in CPI on a timely basis. It creates the possibility of the Fed over-tightening monetary policy, turning an economic slowdown into a more severe economic contraction.

Of course, this is precisely what history tells us will happen.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

Monetary supply also tells us the Fed is likely making a mistake with its current aggressive stance on inflation. As discussed recently, inflation is the consequence of restricted supply owing to the economic shutdown and increased demand from “stimulus” checks. The massive surge in M2 money supply has reversed and has about a nine-month lead on inflation.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

While the Fed is hiking rates to quell inflation, the contraction of the money supply is doing the job for them.

Driving With the Rearview Mirror
There is little doubt we are currently amidst an economic slowdown. With the Federal Reserve focused on combating inflationary pressures by tightening monetary policy, thereby slowing economic demand, logic suggests that current economic data trends will continue to decline. Of course, the only difference between an economic slowdown and a recession is whether the readings can remain above zero.

As the Fed continues to hike rates, each hike takes roughly nine months to work its way through the economic system. Therefore, the rate hikes from March 2020 won’t show up in the economic data until December. Likewise, the Fed’s subsequent and more aggressive rate hikes won’t be fully reflected in the economic data until early- to mid-2023. As the Fed hikes at subsequent meetings, those hikes will continue to compound their effect on a highly leveraged consumer with little savings through higher living costs. We have shown previously that the consumer is exceptionally unprepared for such an outcome.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

Given the Fed manages monetary policy in the “rear view” mirror, more real-time economic data suggest the economy is rapidly moving from economic slowdown toward recession. The signals are becoming clearer from inverted yield curves to the six-month rate of change of the Leading Economic Index.


Source: St Louis Federal Reserve, Refinitiv Chart: RealInvestmentAdvice.com

The media and the White House will likely proclaim victory by stating the first two quarters of 2022 were not a recession but only an economic slowdown.

However, given the lag effect of changes to the money supply and higher interest rates, indicators are pretty clear recession risk is very probable in 2023.

From an investment standpoint, it suggests the current market rally is not the beginning of a new bull market. Instead, investors are likely being lured into the clutches of a bear market rally that will probably have rather disappointing outcomes.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

World Food Prices Crash The Most Since 2008

SUNDAY, AUG 07, 2022 - 12:00 PM

Central banks and mainstream economists were entirely wrong about the narrative that inflation is "transitory," but after more than a year of raging inflation to four-decade highs, there are signs that current price spikes are waning.

One of those price declines is the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) index of world food declined by 8.6% to 140.9 points in July, marking the fourth consecutive month of declines since hitting an all-time high in March. However, the international price of a basket of commonly-traded food commodities is still 13.1% higher than in July 2021.

As shown below, the UN food index recorded the largest monthly decline since the summer of 2008.



"The decline in food commodity prices from very high levels is welcome, especially when seen from a food access viewpoint; however, many uncertainties remain, including high fertilizer prices that can impact future production prospects and farmers' livelihoods, a bleak global economic outlook, and currency movements, all of which pose serious strains for global food security," said FAO Chief Economist Maximo Torero.

Besides slumping food prices, inflation expectations alongside commodity prices (fuel prices) have recently eased and come as recession risks across G10 markets are pulled forward (the US has fallen into a technical recession) as central banks raise interest rates aggressively to fight the inflation storm.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

UN Warns Of 'Worrying And Dangerous' Conspiracy Theories

SUNDAY, AUG 07, 2022 - 11:00 AM
The United Nations would like everyone to be on the lookout for 'worrying and dangerous' conspiracy theories - especially those that might lead people to the conclusion that COVID-19 escaped from a lab in Wuhan, China... you know, the thing the WHO just admitted could very well be the case, and which Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has launched recent investigations into.

Some background

Before we get into the UN's latest salvo in the war over narratives (feel free to scroll down if you're a regular reader); We know from government contracts, FOIA records, and leaked emails that the US government was conducting risky gain-of-function research on US soil until former President Obama banned it in 2014 over ethical questions raised by the scientific community. The 'research' included manipulating bat Covid to be more transmissible to humans, and following Obama's ban, was funneled overseas through New York nonprofit, EcoHealth Alliance - whose CEO Peter Daszak secured lucrative contracts to study and manipulate bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China four months before Obama's ban.

Daszak was the guy behind The Lancet's "it couldn't have come from a lab" Natural Origin statement - for which he reportedly engaged in a "bullying campaign" - before generating significant controversy over conflicts of interest involving many of its authors and co-signatories, to which the Lancet later admitted.

1659909557050.png

The first $666,442 installment of EcoHealth's $3.7 million NIH grant was paid in June 2014, with similar annual payments through May 2019 under the "Understanding The Risk Of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" project.



Then, in 2017, a subagency of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) - headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci - resumed funding a controversial grant to genetically modify bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China without the approval of a government oversight body.

Notably, the WIV "had openly participated in gain-of-function research in partnership with U.S. universities and institutions" for years under the leadership of Dr. Shi 'Batwoman' Zhengli, according to the Washington Post's Josh Rogin.



We also know (thanks to a FOIA lawsuit by The Intercept) that Daszak wanted to release 'Chimeric Covid Spike Proteins' Into Bat Populations Using 'Skin-Penetrating Nanoparticles,' only for the 'DEFUSE' proposal to be denied by DARPA on the grounds that it was too risky.



1659909459693.png

Further reading:
1659909371033.png

We challenge the UN to 'debunk' any of the above.

Now that you're up to speed
Enter the UN's new #ThinkBeforeSharing campaign, which helps people "learn how to identify, debunk, react to and report on conspiracy theories to prevent their spread."



To aid gullable individuals navigate the information highway without hitting any conspiracy potholes, UNESCO provides some helpful infographics - one of which thanks Stephen Lewandowsky - Australian psychologist and co-author of a March 2022 Scientific American report complaining about how "The Lab-Leak Hypothesis Made It Harder for Scientists to Seek the Truth."

So the default position of those behind the UN's "watch out for conspiracy theories" campaign is that the lab leak is a conspiracy theory. Right.




They recommend taking action when you've "identified a conspiracy theory," but that you don't get lured into an argument with a conspiracy theorist.

"Any argument may be taken as proof that you are part of the conspiracy and reinforce that belief," which will cause the conspiracy theorist to "argue hard to defend their beliefs."

So what to do? Show "empathy," and avoid "ridiculing them."

"If you are certain you have encountered a conspiracy theory," you must "react" immediately and post a link to a "fact-checking website" in the comments.


In short - this (from 2020):

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1551690346039492608
1:18 min

Stay safe out there citizen!
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Great Recession: Facts Vs Denials

SUNDAY, AUG 07, 2022 - 07:30 AM
Authored by Matthew Piepenburg via GoldSwitzerland.com,

Once again, the US is facing a recession which Main Street feels, Wall Street whistles past, and DC simply denies.

Below, we look at these recessionary forces and delusional policy makers in the context of blunt-speak rather than Fed-speak so that we can best prepare for what’s already felt but rarely spoken from on high.

De-Coding the Latest Fed-Speak: Hawks, Doves or Both?
As expected, and as already priced-in by the markets, the Fed raised the Fed Funds Rate (FFR) last week by 75 bps in what superficially appeared to be a hawkish assault on inflation but what in reality was nothing more than another monetary bluff.

Alas, there’s far more hidden dove than public hawk emanating from Wednesday’s latest Fed “guidance.”

As I’ve consistently argued, the Fed has wanted to exploit (rather than defeat) inflation as a classic means of secretly “inflating away” chunks of its embarrassing debt pile while publicly pretending to “combat” inflation with anemic (6.75% y/y) rate hikes (and a 2.50% FFR) which will never catch up with (and therefore never defeat) current inflation rates above the 9% level.

Everyone, including Powell, knows that Uncle Sam can’t afford rising rates or a perpetually strong USD.

So why the public ruse to “fight” 9% inflation” with 2.5% FFR?

Simple: The Fed sees a recession coming and needs to raise rates today so they’ll have something—anything—to cut tomorrow.

Dovish Pivot Translated
Thus, and as consistently argued, the Fed’s hawkish July chest-puffing will eventually (i.e., when the recession becomes official) lead to some dovish two-stepping as Powell has effectively telegraphed a future rate hike pause by using the magic words “depending on the data.”

In short, I believe the Fed is looking for an excuse to print more dollars and cap more yields/rates with more inflationary mouse-click magic money and hence more Main Street pain—all very bad for a debased yet relatively strong USD and all very good for real monetary metals like gold.

Stated simply, I feel last Wednesday was the first sign/hint of an inevitable Fed pivot from rising rates to pausing rates, and then eventually, falling (YCC) rates and a falling dollar over the coming months and quarters.

We’ll know more at the end of August when Powell scoots off to Jackson Hole as the rest of the US sinks deeper into a recessionary hole.

Recession Translated
And what’s the new excuse for the inevitable pivot to more artificial “accommodation” (i.e., QE) rather than the current and fake “inflation fighting” QT?

Powell described it in Fed-speak as “watching for a slowdown in economic activity.”

Translated into honest-speak, this just means that Powell’s narrative will be shifting from inflation semantics to recession realities, despite every current effort made from DC to deny a recession.

I’m always impressed by the Fed’s ability to pervert English, math and honesty in the name of fantasy, calm and policy.

As we’ve shown elsewhere with blunt math rather than sensational drama, the Fed, and its minions at the BLS, have literally invented a magical calculator which makes 2+2=1 on everything from CPI Inflation, and the M3 Money Supply to the current metrics used to turn privately sought negative real rates into publicly positive real rates.

With so much dishonesty from (and hence distrust of) the policy makers, it thus comes as no surprise that even the definition of a recession is now being perverted to supplant reality with fantasy and thus keep the masses comfortably numb from the consequences of the Fed’s increasingly failed monetary policies—namely a Fed-engineered recession to deflate Fed-made inflation.

But can any of us remember the last time a central banker stood up and confessed: “Boy, we really screwed that up, got that wrong, and are now facing years of self-inflicted misery; sorry about that”?

Or can any of us imagine a central banker saying: “OK, we’ve been lying to you for years about true inflation levels, which we actually need to pay down the debts we’ve helped create and which we will now use a recession to quell. Sorry about that.”

A Lesson in Recessionary Realism
Luckily, we’re not interested in the Faustian bargain required to work in DC, so we can all enjoy some honest math and cold data when it comes to confessing recessions.

As most already know, two consecutive quarters of declining real GDP is how recessions are defined and have been defined for years.

Powell, Yellen and Biden’s press secretary, however, will nevertheless assert that the real definition of a recession is suddenly not as simple as that.

Hmmm.

Ok. So how about if we add the following facts (and leading indicators) to help our financial leadership in DC confess that a recession is precisely where we are headed and frankly already standing.

Toward this end, let’s share a few data points they might have overlooked when backpedaling on the “recession” question, namely

1. U.S. New Home Inventories are at the highest levels since 2018 and pending homes sales (reeling under the weight of rising mortgage rates) fell y/y by 20% in June.



2. Housing data is directly linked to tax receipt data. That is, both fall together, and as tax receipt income falls, this too is a recessionary indicator, as falling US tax receipts are equally correlated to falling US stock prices.



3. Advertising budgets/spending policies are falling at places like Amazon, while inventories at places like Walmart are rising as their profits are falling, including names like Target whose stock price tanked by 24% on Q1 earnings misfires; and…

4. Hawkish rate hikes and a strengthening USD are a poison to the earnings flows of such enterprises already in debt up to their ears after years of “free debt” expansion in the backdrop of repressed rates and post-08 unlimited money printing.

By the way, such ad-spend cuts, falling earnings, tanking profits, and new-hire slowdowns seen across the US at retailers like Walmart, Target and Amazon are typical and leading recessionary indicators which often precede/portend future labor layoffs.

5. Consumer confidence among even the higher-income US population is sinking fast:

6. Rising rates and the strong USD policy pursued by Yellen and Powell has made the cost of US entitlements (i.e., health, social security etc.) painfully worse and ultimately unsustainable.

When Yellen was drunk-driving at the Fed, for example, those entitlements were 54% of US tax receipts in 2015; today, as spending increases and inflationary 10% “cost of living adjustments” (COLA) are honestly applied, annual US entitlement payments will very soon reach 90% of US tax receipts.

In short, the current and “hawkish” rising-rate-strong-USD policy at the Eccles building will bankrupt the federal government unless a pivot is made soon to fill the spending gaps and deficits with more fake fiat money—i.e., more QE.

After all, that needed money is certainly not coming from an anemic GDP, a topping and tanking market and hence declining tax receipts.

7. As to Uncle Sam’s embarrassing bar tab, he is facing $23T of outstanding IOU’s, 30% of which are poised to re-price at the end of this year at a higher (6.75%) rather than lower annual rate, which boils down to roughly $460B in additional spending (12% of tax receipts) just to cover those rising interest expenses.

Thus, unless the Fed hits the “QE-Button” very soon, Uncle Sam will be hiding from his creditors behind the Fed and its currently dim “happy hour” sign.

8. At the global level, nearly every major “developed economy” is little more than a glorified banana republic mathematically staring down the barrel of a sovereign debt crisis as governmental rates (i.e., the cost of borrowing) are rising at the very same time that economic growth and new export orders are sinking:



Meanwhile the Pravda-Like Denial Continues
Despite each of the foregoing hard facts, US Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, is leading the official DC chorus in a now openly pathetic effort to deny reality in ways reminiscent of the Soviet era circa 1963.

According to Yellen, and after back-to-back quarters of negative GDP growth, “there’s no evidence of a recession now.”

Such words once again confirm how central bankers are nothing more than word-smith politicians (propagandists?) dressed in banker clothing and broken (free-market) high heels.

Math and hard data are no longer the key focus of our central bankers. Like candor and ethics, they’ve replaced sincere numbers with political nouns and false narratives.

It seems today that along with science, culture, comedy, creativity and history, the very discipline of economics has itself been canceled.

What to Expect?
In such a distorted, desperate and frankly dishonest backdrop of form over substance and false narratives over honest math, what can the rest of us expect from our central planners on high and our real world experience on the ground?
As I recently argued, the Fed knows it will not beat inflation (which it secretly needs) via rising rates.

Instead, Powell will centrally engineer a currently “deniable” recession (which is dis-inflationary) to publicly “combat” otherwise deliberately sought inflation.

Toward this end, these fork-tongued bankers will also pull out their usual tricks and magical calculators to convince the world and markets that officially reported inflation levels are honest (despite being at least 50% under-reported) while simultaneously and deliberately pursuing a policy of negative real rates (i.e., inflation rates above interest rates) as they publicly and dishonesty report them as positive.

So yes, a recession is here, and a longer and deeper one is coming.

The Fed will use words and dishonest math to calm the cognitively dissonant from an abrupt market sell-off or a collective wising up.

As I see it, the Fed can postulate and chest puff a hawkish and rising rate policy for now and perhaps even into the fall.

But unless the Fed in particular, and the major central banks in general, wish to “defeat” inflation by catapulting the world into a global recession whose depth, duration and pain will be extreme, they will have no mathematical nor even political choice but to lower rates, weaken their currencies and fight recessions within their front yards.

As recently argued, no nation, regime nor system in history has conquered a recession by jacking up rates and strengthening their currency.

Given the evidence above, the US is heading straight into a recession and as such will be forced to confront that reality (however downplayed or officially postponed) by cranking out the mouse-click money in a way which will cap yields, debase the dollar and thus be a tailwind for precious metals across the board.

Unless, of course, you think all that data above is fake news and that the Fed has outlawed recessions, in which case all is fine and will always be fine, right?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

A Winter Of Anger

Authored Raul Ilargi Meijer via The Automatic Earth blog,

It is very simple: if you’d ask most citizens of whichever EU country if they are willing to risk being unable to feed and heat their children in order to support Ukraine and Zelensky, they would say NO. Hell no!

But that is what they’re all being pushed towards.

Food prices look to at least double from here, after they’ve doubled once already, while energy prices are set to triple or worse. And there’s no logical reason for it.

This is not due to some inevitable market mechanism, it’s because the west decided to halt all Russian imports after the latter’s Special Military Operation in Ukraine. All western leaders found that reason enough to cut all, or nearly all, imports from Russia. Gas, oil, fertilizer, food. Essentials. They could have been sitting around a negotiating table, but chose not to. Which only works as long as things remain sort of affordable. And then, it does not.

Problem is, they had and have no alternative to the Russian supplies of these goods (and there’s many more).

See, this is how we know they don’t make their own decisions. Those are made in Brussels and Davos, and then the “leaders” have to carry out the preconceived programs, and they will.

No elected official on his/her own would risk to destroy their own country’s energy or food safety, with elections coming up every few years. But their WEF/Davos connections have changed that “logic”. The WEF makes sure no western leader gets elected who is not a member of their club. There’s only one path to power these days.

But these people grossly underestimate the effect that hunger and cold -will- have on their citizens. The first signs of that are visible in the protests of truckers and farmers, but that’s just a start. You just wait till the cold sets in, and the running blackouts, and the hunger. Wait till people have to feed their kids scraps from a bare table in a cold dark home.

That’s when you will see who people really are. People in the west are overfed, and lazy, and not too sharp, but wait till their kids, and their families, are truly suffering. They’ve seen the example of the farmers and truckers. Wait for people to see the link between their own lives, and the farmers; then you will see who they really are.

“Leaders” like Trudeau and Rutte think they have this under control, that they can make the farmers do what their governments say they must, if need be with assistance from police or even the army. But you cannot send cops and soldiers against your farmers, because 1) they make your food, 2) the people support them, 3) they have a centuries-old democratic right to be farmers, and 4) they don’t take no sh*t for an answer.

This goes back 100s of years, much longer than the right of any politician to tell them what to do. The Dutch farmers on Friday told Rutte to prepare for the hardest actions yet, and they’re still not joking. My guess would be this time they will paralyze the country. Not because they are crazy; 10,000 of them would need to close shop if Rutte gets what he wants, and they won’t let that happen. Farmers will not idly stand by while their neighbor is forced out of business.

No, they are not crazy. They refuse to talk to Rutte, in a sign a of how much they trust him. He assigned a mediator, from his own political club, and all farmer org’s but one refused to talk to him too. The one that did, found the talk useless.

Rutte wants the 10,000 scalps no matter what, but it’s just not going to happen. He is shown the limits of his power. Having been PM for 12 years, that’s a bit of a shock.

Obviously, this is all strongly connected to the past 2,5 years of measures and mandates and all. The political class got a taste of power that they did not have before, and got carried away. Well, they went too far this time. One telling number was that of US parents letting their youngest kids be vaxxed: what was it, 0.45%?! And 220 million adult Americans have either never been vaxxed or never boosted. No connection to the farmers? You wait and see.

The game is over. People’s patience with their politicians is ending. But the politicians themselves don’t see that; how could they when they censor all discontent and reports from doctors and scientists who don’t follow the “official” line? They’ve lost touch with the very world they’re supposed to represent. All they get to see is the info that is left after their own “norms” have censored the rest. They see only what they like to see.

In Europe, the Germans and Dutch will manage to be sort of OK, but only at the expense of poorer EU countries. And that won’t even be their main problem; that problem will be at home; their own farmers will come for them. And their poorest.

Countries will leave the EU (and the euro). Hungary first to go?! In Greece, there’s already talk of rolling blackouts this winter, and they get most of their electricity from hydro. Italy is a shambles. How many present “leaders” will still be in place January 1 2023? How about June? After a winter of great discontent?

And they’re all telling you that “we” have to win in Ukraine first, and everything will be alright. But “we” have already lost in Ukraine, we did on February 24, and “we” should be talking to, and making peace with, Russia. Why are we not? Because we don’t want food and energy? The folks in Brussels and Davos will not be hungry and cold. But in other EU places they will be. And they will come to balance this thing out.

As for the US, I’m scared there too. Energy prices may not get as bad as in Europe, but food will be real bad (and how about housing?!).

And there’s this fight between two factions going on, that starts to feel like what went on before the Civil War.

I hope I’m wrong, but I feel it everywhere: Overreach.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Ruble- the other Reserve Currency)


Turkey Agrees To Pay For Russian Gas With Rubles

Authored by Julianne Geiger via OilPrice.com,

Turkey’s President Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin agreed on Friday to bolster cooperation after a four-hour meeting, a joint statement from the two nations has revealed as cited by Reuters.

As part of the deal, which would increase cooperation in the transportation, agriculture, finance, and construction industries and present a seemingly united front against “terrorist organizations” in Syria, Turkey agreed to change how it pays Russia for natural gas. Under the new agreement, Turkey has agreed to pay Russia partially in rubles, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said after the meeting.

Russian President Vladimir Putin announced months ago that unfriendly nations would be required to pay for Russian energy through a rubles account to insulate Russia from the effects of Western sanctions.

While Russia would not consider Turkey an unfriendly nation, Turkey’s payment in rubles for Russia’s natural gas would protect those payments from sanctions, and could smooth things over with Moscow, who might otherwise frown on Turkey’s activities in Syria.

Last month, Turkey also helped broker a deal to ship grain between Russia and Ukraine, further strengthening ties between Russia and Turkey.

Turkey opposes the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and its affiliate, YPG—long considered by Turkey, the United States, and the EU to be a terrorist group—which has waged an insurgency for decades against the Turkish government in support of Kurdish minorities in Turkey. Russia has strong ties with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who controls most of the airspace in northern Syria.

Erdogan, facing an election next year, is in a complicated situation, with Turkey experiencing skyrocketing annual inflation of nearly 80%.

This economic crisis would no doubt intensify without Russian gas supplies.

Turkey imports nearly half of the gas it uses from Russia.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Dutch farmer rebellion continues as government negotiations remain at stalemate 2:36 min

Dutch farmer rebellion continues as government negotiations remain at stalemate
Rebel News Published August 7, 2022

Rebel News is back in the Netherlands to report on the continuation of the farmer protests against nitrogen limits set by Mark Rutte's government.


Dutch farmer rebellion continues as government negotiations remain at stalemate
Rebel News is back in the Netherlands to report on the continuation of the farmer protests against nitrogen limits set by Mark Rutte's government.
Rebel News is back in the Netherlands and on standby to cover the Dutch Farmer Rebellion. Recently, Prime Minister Mark Rutte and his government have “opened up negotiations” with the farmers to establish a deal, but the government hasn't moved an inch, so the farmers are continuing their protest of nitrogen targets.

The protests originated when Rutte proposed a nitrogen crisis in the Netherlands, which led to legislation being implemented where livestock are to be halved, nitrogen emissions in some farms are to be cut up to 95% and even up to 30% of the land is to be taken by the state.

Last week the farmers' defence force came out to warn Rutte and his government to “get ready for the toughest actions yet.” So it's only right that Rebel News would head back here and be ready to cover any happenings that occur in the Netherlands.

Keep yourselves up to date over at www.FarmerRebellion.com and stay tuned for more updates.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Stephen Miller: Biden's Border Policies "Crime Against Humanity - Deserves Eternal Shame of History" 5:38 min

Stephen Miller: Biden's Border Policies "Crime Against Humanity - Deserves Eternal Shame of History"
The Gateway Pundit Published August 7, 2022

Stephen Miller: The border is completely controlled by foreign cartels... The Biden Administration's decision to terminate President Trump's hugely successful border policies is a crime against humanity... This administration deserves to lose not only a record number of seats in the House and Senate over this border crisis but the eternal shame of history.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
UK Gardeners Beware! 3:40 min

UK Gardeners Beware!
SettingBrushfires Published August 7, 2022
UK Gardeners Beware!

'Having neighbours snitching on each other, and handing out fines, pushes us closer to what I think, the authorities wanted, all along - a police state.'

Mark Dolan reacts to gardeners being encouraged to report their neighbours if they spot them breaching hosepipe bans.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
International Monetary Fund, World Bank - 2020: THIS MUST BE STOPPED 2:01 min

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, WORLD BANK - 2020: THIS MUST BE STOPPED

Aug 07, 2022
International Monetary Fund, World Bank - 2020: THIS MUST BE STOPPED
The Digital ID represents the biggest comprehensive threat to human rights and freedoms that our planet has ever faced .

From the center for Human Rights and Global Justice:
"Paving The Road To Hell": Digital ID Systems Could Lead To Severe, Irreversible Human Rights Violations
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(The following was referenced in the recent Catherine Austin Fitts CHD "Financial Rebellion" video on updates on the missing $21 trillion - previously posted, can be found on CHD or here: ‘Financial Rebellion’ Episode 33: Does BIS Owe Us $21Trillion ($65,000 per Person)? 46:10 min )

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gK3s5j7PgA
56:41 min

All the Plenary's Men

Apr 28, 2017


BestEvidence

“The King can do no wrong.” —William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England “When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.” —Ex-President Richard Nixon, interview with David Frost The question at bar is why the U.S. Department of Justice has failed to prosecute any too-big-to-fail banks or—more importantly—their bankers, even for admitted crimes. It’s a crucial question, because after eight straight years of unremitting prosecutorial failure, it looks very much as if a select group of top banks can, in fact, do no wrong. If that’s the case, then our constitutional republic isn’t merely in trouble. It's dead. A person or group of people who satisfy Blackstone’s criterion for ultimate sovereign power—the power to commit crimes with impunity—can’t exist in a nation where the law reigns supreme. And yet here we are a decade after the financial crisis began in earnest, and not one TBTF bank executive has gone to jail. Legally, the TBTF banks are indistinguishable from the King, since the power to commit crimes with impunity swallows all other sovereign powers; such a power isn’t even supposed to exist in the U.S., and yet it does. Moreover, since there can’t be two kings in a kingdom, the entire U.S. government, from the president on down, is just one of the King’s men under this formulation of power. The real job of the U.S. government, then, isn’t to represent the will of the people at all, it’s to do the King’s bidding. A nation that isn’t governed by law is governed by instead by a king—it’s one or the other—and the president’s inferiority to such an above-the-law sovereign was confirmed over 40 years ago with Nixon’s ouster. The president, unlike the King, answers to the law (despite Nixon's opinion). Now, you may say that while the TBTF banks might arguably have the de facto power of the King, that’s a far cry from wielding such power formally (i.e., having de jure criminal immunity). The reply to that objection is set forth in this film, “All the Plenary’s Men,” which is a sequel to “The Veneer of Justice in a Kingdom of Crime.” Another objection, raised by the DOJ itself, is that it HAS prosecuted TBTF bankers, citing cases like that of Raj Rajaratnam. These cases, however, in fact reveal the DOJ acting on behalf of the criminal global banking cartel. On that score, the DOJ’s abysmal track record is by now so extensive and so thorough that it’s possible to spot legal patterns in the DOJ’s protracted miscarriage of justice, and, as you’re about to see, those patterns are very deeply disturbing indeed. What’s been going on cuts right past a garden variety constitutional crisis like Watergate straight to a crisis of sovereignty. The backdrop for all of this is HSBC’s exoneration in December of 2012 for laundering money for drug dealers and terrorists, about which the House Financial Services Committee issued a report in July of 2016. Whether it was due to the political circus in town at the time, or to the Republican authorship of that report (albeit without dissent), it didn’t get nearly the scrutiny it deserved. You see, prosecutors working on the HSBC case were actually going to indict the bank, but they got overruled, and HSBC and its team of criminals skated. The story of how exactly that reversal came about reveals, if not the King himself, then certainly many of the King’s top men. Make the coffee extra strong before viewing. Lots of ground gets covered, quickly. And don’t mothball those pitchforks and torches just yet. * * * *

Pre--release interviews (chron order): http://www.davejanda.com/guests/john-... (Operation Freedom with Dr. Dave Janda) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAbYF... (Shadow of Truth with Rory Hall and Dave Kranzler) http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/podcast... (TF Metals Report with Craig Hemke) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cjyqb... (X22Report Spotlight with Dave)
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Meat Causes Cancer? The WHO's Studies "Literally Are Dogsh*t" .56 min

Meat Causes Cancer? The WHO's Studies "Literally Are Dogsh*t"
Red Voice Media Published August 7, 2022

Ivor Cummins: "The studies on meat and cancer are 100% nonsense. I mean, they literally are dogsh*t or dog poo. And the reason is they've got a hazard ratio, which is 1.09 or 1.11, which is meaningless in an associational study.

But they've hyped it up because I think their intended message was 'meat causes cancer,' and then they work backwards from there. That's the way the studies read. I mean, they're nonsense. They're associational with a hazard ratio 1.1. I mean, it's just a joke."

Full Video: Dr. Simon Meets Ivor Cummins aka The Fat Emperor - Dr. Simon Goddek [VIDEO]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

GOP Senator: Jobs Report Could Be A ‘Precursor’ Of ‘Serious Economic Issues Coming Very Shortly’

By John Rigolizzo
Aug 7, 2022 DailyWire.com

Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) said that while the July jobs report showed strong job growth, those numbers could be a “precursor” to “serious economic issues coming very shortly.”

Appearing on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday, Rounds said that while the job figures were high, they masked the fact that soaring inflation meant payrolls are declining in value, so companies are still hiring.

“You talked about the possibility of a recession, we just saw that jobs report on Friday, 528,000 new jobs in July, 3.5% unemployment, that’s 50-year low,” host Stephanopoulos began.

“There are two parts that we want to remember,” Rounds responded. “First of all, we know that our GDP has gone down the last two quarters, so let’s all recognize that’s accepted by everybody, that is down.”

“The second part is that, while we’re very happy to see the job growth, positive thing, remember that back in the 1970s, and moving into the 1980s, we actually saw job growth, because unless your wages are keeping up with inflation, payrolls actually go down in value. And so what you’re actually seeing, we believe, might be a precursor of what’s to come.”

“You’re gonna find out larger companies such as Walmart are starting to talk about to reduce the number of people they’re gonna be employing,” Rounds continued. “But in the meantime, if your wages– if you can save on wages because, as inflation goes up, the value of wages is not as great as it was, unless it’s also going up at the same or greater rate– well then, you can afford to have people stay on the payroll, and your payroll actually goes down compared to the products you’re producing or that you’re buying and moving through the market.”

“So while this is good and we want to see job growth, I don’t think we can necessarily say that this is not a precursor yet to probably some more serious economic issues coming very shortly,” he added. “We hope we’re building our way out of a recession but you don’t do that by raising taxes. You do it by promoting and expanding businesses, getting the economy rolling again.”

The economy added 528,000 jobs in July, as The Daily Wire reported Friday, pushing the unemployment rate down to 3.5%. But that number may not be an accurate measure of the strength of the economy, experts noted. “The gain of 528K #jobs in July as the labor force participation rate fell to 62.1, means that most of the new jobs went to people who already had jobs,” economist Peter Schiff tweeted.

“Collapsing real wages force many workers to moonlight to pay the bills. If the labor market were strong one job would be enough,” he added.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Greenfield: The Old World Order

Daniel Greenfield

When President George H.W. Bush delivered a speech to Congress envisioning the emergence of a “new world order”, he had it backward. The new world order wasn’t emerging, it was over.

A “new world”, Bush claimed, “is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known” and he shared that vision with Gorbachev. The Soviet Leader, a year away from being toppled, who had cut his teeth on Communist visions of a new world being born only to inherit a failing system that could no longer win wars or feed its own people, must have been amused.

Gorbachev understood what Bush did not, that no new world order was coming, an old world order was returning. Bush lasted a year longer in office than his Soviet counterpart. And yet his own farewell speech couldn’t help but echo Bush, declaring, “we live in a new world now.”

The new world we live in now is one where Russia is trying to rebuild a Czarist empire, and China, Iran, and every other power or power that was, is fighting to recreate its glory days.

The patchwork international order had been a product of the Cold War that Bush and Gorbachev were eagerly bidding farewell to. Globalism, or the post-Cold War international order based on trade, human rights and conferences proved to be as much of a joke as the UN, the WTO, the NGOs and the multilateral organizations that served as its shaky infrastructure.

Bush envisioned “a world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle” and “nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice” on the brink of the original Gulf War.

But the only law that ever existed was the law of force enforced by self-interest or idealism.

Last year, Secretary of State Blinken declared that human rights would be at the center of our foreign policy, but that other nations would have to make it happen. “Promoting respect for human rights is not something we can do alone, but is best accomplished working with our allies and partners across the globe,” he claimed. The chosen venue for the job was the Human Rights Council whose members include China, Cuba, Pakistan, Qatar, Russia and Venezuela.

As the old political gag goes, “These are my principles. If you don’t like them I have others.”

The new world order means world leaders gathering for a NATO summit that accomplishes nothing except the indignity of Finland and Sweden having to bribe an Islamist butcher in Turkey for the privilege of membership in the hope that if Russia comes for them, we’ll defend them.

In the real world, Finland will be on its own just as it was against the USSR and Germany.

The old world order is the reality that once the meetings are done and the conferences are over, every country is all alone. Virtue signaling globalism means that everyone will fly Ukrainian flags, just as they expressed solidarity with Hong Kong and will hashtag Taiwan at need.

And then they’ll move on to the next political outrage, celebrity gossip or trending news.

In his address on September 11, 1990, Bush called Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait, the “first assault on the new world that we seek, the first test of our mettle.” The first test also proved to be the last. The Iraq wars would shatter any bipartisan and multilateral appetite for American interventions. Obama’s Syrian red line, Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine all mark the slow collapse of the potemkin village erected in the nineties.

The myth of a new world order and its illusion of collective security is worse than the reality of the old world order, offering popular protesters and small countries the false hope that some international consensus or military intervention will come to their aid when help isn’t coming.

Instead of 19th century realpolitik or late 20th century internationalism, we have a much more expensive and imaginary version of the League of Nations. Countless billions of dollars and endless hours are spent propping up an imaginary new world order of a world without war when it would be much healthier for us and for everyone else to acknowledge that none of it is real.

The world isn’t governed by law, but by force, and no one is coming to save anyone. Not us.

The United States isn’t entirely out of the intervention business, but our international forces are deployed for deterrence purposes. Rather than fighting to change things, we are managing the decline. That’s what our troops were doing in Afghanistan for at least a decade, trying to keep one of our old potemkin villages, a “democratic” government, from its inevitable defeat and fall.

Other powers and movements, from Russia and China to Sunni and Shiite Islam, are expanding while America remains committed to a failed vision of a static world. A shrinking West, avidly being colonized by the rest of the world, touts decolonization. But the West has few colonies, instead its cities, London, Los Angeles, and Toronto, are rapidly becoming third world colonies.

America first embraced the ideal of a new world order when it ceased to expand territorially. A century of wars for democracy, along with drastically falling birth rates, convinced Europe to cease its expansionism, but the rest of the world has not decided to be happy with what it has.

World powers seek to restore or build empires, carving up regions into spheres of influence, intimidating, invading, and conquering smaller nations. That old world order was always the defining reality. The Cold War era incorporated it into a larger struggle against Communism, but afterward, the same ugliness continued stripped of any pretense of a world revolution.

With the old world order, the United States can continue to impotently preach Bush’s vision of Americans, “together with Arabs, Europeans, Asians, and Africans in defense of principle and the dream of a new world order” or think about what an American future really looks like.

One in which America is no longer declining or tethered to maintaining an illusory new order.

A century of tired arguments have reduced us to the false choice between isolationism and internationalism. But at the height of our rising power in the 19th century, the United States was neither. It was not afraid of asserting its ideals, but neither was it foolish enough to believe that the rest of the world would go along or that we were obligated to make them all behave. We primarily pursued our own interests and we were not afraid of a little expansionism either.

Most importantly, we did not see our place in the world as bound by the rest of the world.

American foreign policy has come to be a prisoner of a global construct. Its exponents have shouldered a global burden that no empire in history has ever been able to carry. Americans have been told to take on the responsibility for the freedom and happiness of the entire world. Our national policy is to first conceive of how the world should be and then try to bring it about.

But a better world doesn’t begin with American self-sacrifice, but with a greater America.

America can best serve the world by being itself. The new world order never really existed and pretending that it did does no favors to the countries who might actually depend on it. Instead of trying to mobilize the world, America can provide a meaningful alternative for the world.

The American Revolution and the Constitution ushered in the true new world order not by seeking to control the world, but by showing the human race what was possible. Every effort to outdo that order with a new world order has failed. And Bush’s, like Gorbachev’s, has joined the trash heap of history. The real new world order is not one that envisions a transformed humanity, but that empowers individuals, not nations, not from the top, but from the bottom.

The constitutional order is not the end of history, but the beginning of humanity.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Donald Trump: Next President Must ‘Remove Rogue Bureaucrats and Root out the Deep State’

Former President Donald Trump once again talked about overhauling the administrative state on Saturday, telling a crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas that the next Congress and president need to “remove rogue bureaucrats and root out the deep state.”

Trump told the CPAC audience:

As we secure the border, another key priority for the next Congress and the next President will be to drain the swamp once and for all to remove rogue bureaucrats and root out the deep state. Congress should pass groundbreaking reform empowering the president to ensure that any federal employee who is corrupt, incompetent, or unnecessary for the job can be told, “You’re fired.” You ever heard that? You’re fired.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1556069573794873344
2:06 min

Trump’s comments come after recent reports asserted Trump would use his Schedule F executive order to fire nearly 50,000 government bureaucrats if he returns to the White House in 2024. Trump seemingly confirmed these reports when he referenced the executive order in a recent speech at Turning Point USA’s Student Action Summit last month.

Trump complained that the current process to remove a federal bureaucrat from their post is a lengthy process that takes an average of five years:

Our current appeals process to remove these bureaucrats, people that can really be bad, they can even be thieves. You can catch them stealing large sums of money. You have to go through a three stage appeals process, which takes on average five years per stage. 15 years you’ll be gone; you’ll be out of office by then.

Trump said that the lengthy timeframe dissuades other politicians from starting the bureaucrat removal process because it takes longer than their terms in office.

“In other words, to fire someone who is doing a bad job, if the government wins, will take more than a decade under the current system. Almost all politicians won’t start that process because they’ll be gone and they know it,” Trump said, adding:

You know a lot of politicians, they go into Washington, they’re all set. And then they get caught up with people that say, ‘Hey, I’ll be here a hell of a lot longer than you will,’ and the politician just goes about having nice dinners. We can’t do it anymore. We’ve got to run this country properly, because it’s time to clean house in Washington, D.C., and we did a lot of it but nobody knew that deep state was that deep. We did a lot of it.

Although Trump has hinted at, but not officially announced, a 2024 presidential run, he would have the majority support of Republicans, according to a straw poll conducted at CPAC in Dallas.

Trump won a massive 69 percent of the vote, which was 45 percent higher than the next closest challenger, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), who received just 24 percent support among CPAC attendees.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

August 7, 2022
The inconvenient truth of electric vehicles

By James Poplar
As someone who is retired and on a fixed income, I am often chided by my progressive friends for driving a truck that is twenty-five years old with close to 300,000 miles on the odometer. The typical refrain is, why are you not driving an electric vehicle (E.V.) that is environmentally friendly, vice your clunker that contributes to global warming? After all, it is "the right and responsible thing to do."

Yes, I believe that the future of private transportation lies in electric and in other alternative (perhaps hydrogen)–powered vehicles, but for a number of reasons, the timing is not yet right to have the government mandate that I and others own an E.V.

I offer the following rationale:

First, from a national security standpoint, China made a conscious decision years ago to dominate the market in E.V. battery production and technology. This is the same country that makes no bones about surpassing the United States as the world superpower. In addition, China has an abysmal human rights record — what other country harvests the organs from its political opposition? Why would we as a nation want to put our own national security at risk in the hands of a nation determined to impose communism around the globe?

Second, currently, the materials used to manufacture E.V. batteries are typically mined in Africa by child labor under the harshest conditions imaginable. Children are typically forced to sift through piles of material in an effort to secure the scarce materials (cobalt, lithium, and nickel) required for battery production.

Children as young as two years old transport, wash, and crush minerals to earn half a dollar a day. The problem of child labor used to source E.V. battery materials has been known for several years, yet we look the other way. In addition, the mining process in not environmentally friendly and in itself contributes to global warming.

Third, all E.V. batteries have a limited service life, at the end of which they must be disposed of in our landfills, as the recycling options, unlike with my petroleum-powered vehicle, are extremely limited. Millions of electric car batteries will retire in the next decade. What happens to them?

How do batteries not end up in a mountain of waste and further contaminate the environment?

Fourth, even with government subsidies, E.V.s are expensive. In rural America, the typical income is at or below the poverty level. How can the masses afford an E.V. when they can hardly afford to eat? Purchasing an E.V. or, for that matter, a newer gasoline vehicle is beyond the reach of most who live in "flyover country."

So are we ready to fully embrace E.V.s and put our conventional vehicles out to pasture? For me, the answer is no. Please convince me that I am off base, and I will be the first in line to purchase my new "socially responsible" and "environment friendly" E.V.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Why Globalism Cannot Survive

Submitted by flash

Vladimir Putin correctly points out that globalism is inherently doomed to failure due to the same sort of structural incoherencies that afflict communism, feminism, and imperialism.

A new epoch of world history is approaching and only “truly sovereign” states will be able to succeed in the changed environment, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday.

Speaking at a business forum, Putin claimed that “truly revolutionary,” “enormous” changes would lead to the creation of a new, “harmonious, fairer and more community-focused and safe” world order. In this new epoch, “only truly sovereign states can ensure high growth dynamics,” he said.

By the term ‘sovereignty’ the Russian president means “freedom of national development, and thus of each person individually,” as well as “technological, cultural, intellectual, educational viability of the state” and a “responsible, active and nationally minded, nationally oriented civil society.”

Such a state, the president said, will serve as an example for others when it comes to “the standards and quality of people’s life, the protection of traditional values and high humanistic ideals.”

This kind of world is in sharp contrast to the Western-dominated unipolar world order, which, in Putin’s opinion, is “becoming a brake on the development of our civilization.”

He accused the West of being “racist and neo-colonial,” saying that its ideology “is becoming increasingly more like totalitarianism.”

The president argued that despite attempts by Western elites to preserve the existing world order, the changes are “irreversible.”

Globalism is simply another form of imperialism that involves a self-selected, self-serving elite ruling over a diverse collection of different peoples with different beliefs, capabilities, and interests. It utilizes the influence of money rather than the force of military might, but both the effects and the consequences are the same.

However, globalism is even less tenable than standard imperialism because the money it is built upon is an illusion created by the manufacture of debt through finance capitalism. This means that once the debt structure becomes overloaded and begins to collapse, the influence upon which the entire governing system rests begins to vanish as well.

Furthermore, the satanic element that elevates incompetents and degenerates to positions of power relies in part upon rewards that can no longer be provided once the system begins to break down. In the absence of the carrot, this leaves only the systemic stick, the pervasive blackmail, to hold the elite together and there are far too many people who are either immune or unconcerned to it, thus permitting the rise of a rebellious rival elite who have no loyalty to the globalist elite or the system.

This is why globalism has no choice but to become totalitarian and abandon all of its purported Enlightenment ideals, which were never more than propagandistic lies in the first place. And this is why nationalist leaders such as Putin can be so confident that the changes to the world order are irreversible, because the existing neo-liberal one is already collapsing under the weight of its debt and structural incoherencies.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

How the energy crisis drove Germany to rethink shutting down its nuclear plants

by Jeremy Beaman, Energy and Environment Reporter | | August 07, 2022 06:15 AM

German leaders are actively weighing whether to extend the life of the country's three remaining nuclear reactors as they scramble to avoid energy shortfalls, a turnabout reflecting the dire economic situation facing Europe's top economy ahead of winter.

Chancellor Olaf Scholz, a member of the Social Democrats, said Wednesday that extending the life of the plants “can make sense" in the face of the energy crisis, as the government carries out a stress test of the electric grid to see if the power sector could do without them amid deteriorating energy supply conditions associated with the war in Ukraine.

The consensus among leaders of the coalition government, including Scholz and Vice-Chancellor Robert Habeck, a member of the anti-nuclear Greens, had been to allow the plants to retire at the end of December, as scheduled under Scholz's predecessor, Angela Merkel.

That stance remained more or less unchanged well into the war in Ukraine, as Russia began incrementally cutting off European buyers from its natural gas, which is used as an industrial feedstock, for power generation, and for home heating.

Many in Berlin still oppose delaying retirements of the nuclear plants, which generate electricity without producing greenhouse gas emissions. Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, also of the Greens, countered Wednesday that keeping the plants running is "not an option."

But Russia's repeated reductions in natural gas exports to Europe have changed the calculus. The German climate and economy ministry, led by Habeck, elected in July to perform a weekslong test to see whether the grid would have sufficient power generation capacity under current conditions, or in the event of further disruption.

Germany, and Europe more broadly, is being crushed under the weight of exorbitant gas and power prices.

Gas prices on the benchmark Dutch TTF trading hub shot up as high as $60 per MMBtu in the last week. For reference, U.S. benchmark prices have been trading in the $8 per MMBtu range, which is historically high for the United States.

European power prices have soared on higher gas, too. Germany, along with Italy, France, and the United Kingdom, had its highest monthly average power prices on record in July, according to analytics firm Rystad Energy.

Months of this kind of volatility, and uncertainty as to whether Russia will keep delivering any natural gas to the European Union at all, have caused governments to pursue demand reduction measures, sign off on more coal-fired power generation, and in Germany's case, probe the feasibility of extending the life of the remaining three plants.

The current stress test is the government's second look at the nuclear retirement question since the war began.

Habeck said in February, in the days after the invasion of Ukraine began, that "there are no taboos" on the subject of energy security, saying the priority was phasing out fossil fuels.

That suggested an openness to keeping the reactors running, but after the review concluded in early March that extending the reactors' life was not recommended, Habeck said doing so "would not help us."

Conditions have significantly changed since then. The EU has approved sanctions on Russian coal imports and most oil imports and promised to cut ties with Russian fuels over time.

While the gas trade has been spared from formal EU sanctions, Russian gas company Gazprom has instituted multiple cuts to gas exports via the Nord Stream pipeline, which connects Russia to Germany, such that it is currently shipping gas at just 20% of capacity.

Gazprom has blamed technical problems, as well as EU sanctions and paperwork issues, for the shutoffs, which German and other leaders have disputed.

Extending the life of the three reactors could keep online a generating source that provided some 6% of Germany's generating mix between January and June, but it's not a done deal yet.

Scholz has insisted upon waiting for the conclusions of the stress test before the government decides one way or the other, Euractiv reported. Moreover, strong opposition remains, including among Scholz's Social Democrats.

“We will not revise the phase-out of nuclear energy,” Saskia Esken, party leader, said on Wednesday.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Great Reset at Work: The Dystopian Transformation of the Food Industry

by Birsen Filip August 7, 2022 in Opinions

Editor’s Note: I will not be eating bugs. I will not stand in a breadline. I refuse to participate in the totalitarianism that appears to be spreading across the globe and that may be coming to America in the not-too-distant future. This is why we strongly recommend three different long-term storage food companies. These wonderful sponsors can help you avoid the crickets for protein and refrain from becoming beholden to government to survive. Here’s the article by Birsen Filip…

Coercive covid-19 lockdown measures, vaccine mandates, the transition to green energy, and poorly thought out Western sanctions against Russia have all played significant roles in disrupting global food markets and supply chains. In May 2022, data from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization indicated that, relative to twelve months ago, “international wheat prices have increased 56 percent,” “cereal prices are up nearly 30 percent,” and “vegetable oils are 45 percent higher.”

The World Bank expects many people to be pushed into extreme poverty and to experience food insecurity on account of higher prices for both food and farm inputs, particularly in nations that import most of their needs in these areas.

More specifically, it notes that “the war in Ukraine has altered global patterns of trade, production, and consumption of commodities in ways that will keep prices at historically high levels through the end of 2024 exacerbating food insecurity and inflation.”

Meanwhile, Bayer, “an international chemicals, agricultural and healthcare group,” projects that “food insecurity will affect up to 1.9 billion people by November 2022—mainly caused by the war in Ukraine and further accelerated by climate change and COVID-19,” which could possibly lead to a “hurricane of hunger.”

In May, the World Economic Forum (WEF) issued a press release stating that “there is a risk that short-term efforts to combat food shortages could come at the expense of meeting climate and sustainability targets given the interconnection between agriculture and climate change. Global food production contributes more than a third of greenhouse gas emissions, and efforts to ramp up food supply could worsen emissions and reliance on fossil fuels.”

The WEF does not support efforts to find immediate solutions to the current food crisis; rather, it is focusing on making radical changes to food production and human beings’ consumption habits over the coming decades. In 2018, the WEF pointed out that

feeding the world in 2050 will require a 70 percent increase in overall food production because of population growth and changes in consumption driven by an expanding middle class, with demand for red meat and dairy products increasing by up to 80 percent. Every opportunity presented by the Fourth Industrial Revolution must be used to realize a global food production system that can address challenges with limited environmental impact.

That shows that transforming the food industry was already among the main items on the WEF’s agenda prior to the emergence of covid-19 and the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine. This became further apparent in June 2020, only three months after the pandemic was declared and well before there were any indications of an impending food crisis: the WEF webpage already stated that “COVID-19 reveals a strong and urgent need for representatives of all sectors of the economy to come together and engage in a dialogue to plan what a post-pandemic food system will look like.”

The WEF has expressed its commitment to “helping define the agriculture industry agenda” and is calling for a transition to new alternatives to help “feed an expanding populace,” such as “Impossible Foods, Just and Beyond Meat,” all of which are “plant-based products” that attempt to imitate “the sensory profile of meat.” It is also promoting the greater utilization of “cultured meat” produced in laboratories.

More precisely, the WEF envisages “the use of biotechnologies to engineer tissues from cell culture for end-product application, such as meat, or the use of cells/microorganisms as a ‘factory’ to produce fats and/or proteins that make up an end food product, such as eggs and milk.” Additionally, it supports the use of “a technique that enables scientists to hack into genomes, make precise incisions, and insert desired traits into plants.”

The WEF is also promoting edible insects, including ants, bees, beetles, caterpillars, crickets, dragonflies, grasshoppers, earthworms, leafhoppers, termites, and locusts, as an alternative food source that would consume “fewer resources than traditional livestock” and emit “less harmful gas than more mainstream farm animals.” In 2018, the WEF stated that “from the farmer’s point of view, raising insects is going to be radically different from raising sheep, pigs, or cattle,” as there will be “no more coping with mud, muck and filth.”

Meanwhile, the “consumption of insects can offset climate change” by reducing people’s “carbon footprint in food consumption.”

To encourage people to accept insects in their daily diets, the WEF has been promoting some of their nutritional benefits and other features. For example, it claims that eating “grasshoppers” will provide “nearly as much protein, more calcium and iron, and less fat than the equivalent amount of ground beef.”

Furthermore, the WEF highlights “insects such as the Tenebrio Molitor” because its “high protein content makes it a highly digestible ingredient that can be used in senior nutrition.” Advocates of edible insects also claim that putting cockroaches on “fruits and vegetables” creates a very good “taste,” while blackflies, which are “rich in fatty acids to the same extent as in some fish oils,” can replace “blood sausage.”

The World Bank largely concurs with the WEF when it comes to the mass production and consumption of edible insects, arguing that insect farming, “for both human food and animal feed, has the potential to increase access to nutritious food, while creating millions of jobs, improving the climate and the environment, and strengthening national economies.”

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations also touts edible insects’ benefits, stating:

Edible insects contain high quality protein, vitamins and amino acids for humans. Insects have a high food conversion rate, e.g., crickets need six times less feed than cattle, four times less than sheep, and twice less than pigs and broiler chickens to produce the same amount of protein. Besides, they emit less greenhouse gases and ammonia than conventional livestock. Insects can be grown on organic waste. Therefore, insects are a potential source for conventional production (mini-livestock) of protein, either for direct human consumption, or indirectly in recomposed foods (with extracted protein from insects); and as a protein source into feedstock mixtures.

Moreover, the International Platform of Insects for Food and Feed (IPIFF), which currently has eighty-three members from twenty-three different countries, was established in 2012 to represent “the interests of the insect production sector towards EU policy makers, European stakeholders and citizens.” In particular, it promotes “the use of insects for human consumption and insect-derived products as a top tier source of nutrients for animal feed.”

The IPIFF pointed out that while “more than 2,000 insect species are consumed worldwide,” only seven species are “used in animal feed” and only about “a dozen are allowed in food” in “certain” members of the European Union. Accordingly, this organization is seeking to increase the variety and quantity of insects consumed in Europe and around the world.

Supporters of the mass production and consumption of alternative food products are fully aware that coercing the world population into accepting this dystopian transformation of the food industry will likely destroy the livelihoods of billions of people who are dependent on conventional farming, which will lead to unprecedented poverty, desperation, misery, and starvation, particularly among the lower and middle classes. Furthermore, they also realize that people are not going to voluntarily make such drastic changes to their food and eating habits, which are often tied to their heritage and traditions.

In 2019, the WEF acknowledged that there is a “unique emotional and cultural politics of food, particularly of meat,” which means that successfully transforming the food system will likely necessitate some degree of force, the censorship of dissenters, and the creation of a narrative that will be pushed by the corporate media, unelected experts, and corrupt politicians in order to make alternative food products appear more palatable.

Accordingly, it is calling for “coordinated public-private efforts and intergovernmental engagement” over the next decade to “develop and own” “a global narrative on the protein transition” so as to “overcome the critical cultural and emotional barriers that may stand in the way of a holistic transformation.”

Clearly, the WEF does not have faith in individual or collective solutions when it comes to people feeding themselves, their families, and their communities going forward. It signaled this in 2019, when it stated that

a reliance on the market or a hope that individual technologies, unconnected projects, or even financing or policy innovations will cause a global breakthrough—even collectively—are perhaps optimistic. These will likely not be enough to create the scale or speed required to provide universally accessible and affordable, healthy and sustainable protein … by 2030.

If successful, the dystopian transformation of the food industry will interfere with or eliminate many different groups’ and societies’ distinct cultural and traditional practices by imposing abhorrent food alternatives. Throughout history, food, meals, and harvests have been important aspects of cultural heritage in virtually every society, bringing families and communities together. In fact, many meals and ingredients have historical, national, seasonal, and religious significance for different communities.

Traditional practices and activities, including rituals, ceremonies, festivals (e.g., springtime festival, harvest festival, winter carnival, Oktoberfest, Mardi Gras), holidays (e.g., Christmas, Eid, the Passover Seder, Hanukkah, New Year’s Eve, Diwali, Easter), and other special events (e.g., engagements, weddings, birthdays, anniversaries, potlucks), which often involve preparing and sharing meals with family, friends, and other members of the community, have also played significant roles in conveying culture, traditions, and distinct identities from one generation to the next.

People that truly care about concepts like diversity, inclusion, and equity, which are often used and abused by woke ideologues and globalist social engineers in order to advance their agendas, should not ignore the fact that food is an important aspect of cultural diversity. In fact, efforts to drastically change the entire food industry can be viewed as direct and violent attacks on the cultural, religious, and national practices of distinct groups across the globe.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

August 7, 2022
Biden administration’s farcical climate policies to devastate farmers, exacerbate food shortages

By Eric Utter
There has been much talk of food shortages recently.

You ain’t seen nothing yet.

Or so say folks like Stephanie Nash, a fourth generation dairy farmer. She and many other farmers are warning that President Biden’s new climate plans will jeopardize our food supply and eventually force many of them out of business. Deliberately.

This at a time when food prices are rapidly rising and food processing plants are rapidly disappearing.

Does it make sense to punish the people who grow our food? Especially when there are already shortages?

This is not your grandfather’s Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party. If Democrats had integrity, they would drop the “F” and “L” from “DFL.” (And if pigs had wings, they could fly.) A truer acronym for their party would be PEA, for Pandering-Elitist-Authoritarians. The PEA Party has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it? Fitting.

Democrats are rabidly pro-abortion. Their policies foster violent crime. They tend to favor assisted suicide. And the legalization of even hard and hallucinogenic drugs. They were/are all-in on vaccine mandates. Apparently, they never met a population control measure they didn’t like.

So, it’s not surprising they want to curtail our food supply.

Hell, too many Americans are overweight, anyway, right? Taking meat and dairy away from them will be a blessing in itself. And it will help stop climate change! A twofer!

But farmers are revolting in the Netherlands over some comparable policies. Perhaps those in Canada and the U.S. will join them soon. This has the makings of an “Atlas Shrugged” situation. Who could blame farmers if they eventually said “the hell with it” and walked away.

Teachers are often said to be the “real heroes.” But, for my money, the people that work dawn to dusk all year long-- fighting through bad weather to feed us-- trump those who are trying to groom our kids and tell them they should consider switching sexes, while teaching them to hate the United States based on faux history. But maybe that’s just me.

Speaking of bad weather, do you really think farmers would be against policies that would likely dramatically lessen the chance that they would suffer through more droughts, floods, and violent storms? (The global warming hucksters don’t really believe what they’re saying, either, else they wouldn’t continue winging around the world in private jets, buying up coastal and island properties.)

I have a big beef with those who would restrict the raising of livestock-- and the production of crops. The fertilizer that comes spewing out of the mouths of the elite globalist snobs is far less useful—and more toxic—than anything made by C.F. Industries or Monsanto.

So why do so many people purport to support leftist policies that are so obviously and demonstrably damaging? Why do roughly half of Americans vote for hypocritical, condescending buffoons?

Some are just ignorant. (Not the same as stupid.) Many are swept up in groupthink. Others are afraid of the possible consequences of deviating from acceptable thought and action. (Say, didn’t this used to be America? Didn’t we used to be Americans?) In a tragic irony, most of our leaders, and the “experts” pushing these policies, know that these measures will devastate farmers—and regular folks—without helping to alleviate or lessen climate change. Instead, these policies help them to get even richer and consolidate their power.

As I’ve stated here before, you have to give them credit for one thing: they are brilliant at being evil.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Americans add $40.1 billion more debt in June

by CNN NewsourceSaturday, August 6th 2022

As Americans navigate a four-decade high in inflation, they're piling-up debt at a greater rate than economists were predicting.

$40.1 billion of debt was reported in June, a spike from May's revised number of $23.8 billion.

The Federal Reserve says borrowing grew by more than 10% compared to 6.3% in May.

Revolving debt, most notably marked by credit card balances, jumped by 16% in June.

Non-revolving debt, such as car and student loans, is up by nearly 9%

Across the board, non-housing related debt saw its largest increase in six years, $103 billion in the 2nd quarter.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

National Security Risk: China Now Owns Nearly 200,000 Acres of Land in America

by Belle Carter August 7, 2022 in Opinions
China Buys American Farmland

Fufeng Group, a bio-fermentation company based in mainland China, recently bought 300 acres in North Dakota for $2.6 million. The manufacturing firm plans to build a milling plant in the area.

As per the latest data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), China possesses over 191,000 acres of land in America, but the figures were before the North Dakota land sale this spring.

North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Monday, August 1, requesting the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to immediately review the purchase.

“We ask that this review process be completed with the utmost urgency to aid Grand Forks officials in their decision-making process and provide clarity on whether this land purchase has national security implications,” the governor stated in the letter.

Fufeng Group USA COO Eric Chutorash claimed that they do not have any Chinese government ownership and the workers will all be Americans. He added that the human resources director, commercial director sales team and engineer are not people transferred from China.

“I know we’re not going to be asked to be collecting any intelligence on Grand Forks Air Force Base,” Chutorash told the Grand Forks Herald during a forum back in March. “I can’t stress it any more than that. (But) personally, I wouldn’t provide it. I don’t believe the team being built there would provide it.”

Burgum said the company agreed to a voluntary CFIUS filing to further explain its intentions in North Dakota. But Chutorash said that his team would be required to state a reason for the CFIUS review when they offer consent and they have been given no reason to request a review.

Fufeng Group is the world’s largest manufacturer of xanthan gum and monosodium glutamate.

China shows displeasure over Pelosi’s Taiwan visit
The growing Chinese territory inside the U.S. can be a problem gauging from China’s response to a recent visit by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in Taiwan.

Following the high-profile visit, China kicked off its biggest-ever military exercises in the seas around the island nation. Pelosi became the highest-ranking U.S. politician to visit the island in 25 years. (Related: China surges forces toward Taiwan, conducts live-fire drills as Speaker Nancy Pelosi visits.)

She praised Taiwan’s democracy and pledged American solidarity during her brief stopover. She even “added fuel to the fire” by saying Chinese anger could not stop world leaders from traveling there.

“Our delegation came to Taiwan to make unequivocally clear that we will not abandon Taiwan,” she told Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen.

White House national security spokesman John Kirby said earlier in the week that Pelosi was within her rights to visit Taiwan while stressing that the trip did not constitute a violation of Chinese sovereignty or America’s longstanding One China policy.

The Chinese didn’t think so.

China’s foreign minister spokesperson Zhao Lijian said: “The Chinese People’s Liberation Army will not sit back.” Following this statement, the Chinese sent warplanes to the Taiwan Strait on Tuesday, August 2, and continued their live-fire drills surrounding Taiwan until Thursday, August 4.

Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party said China is conducting drills on the busiest international waterways and aviation routes and that is “irresponsible, illegitimate behavior.”

Meanwhile, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi called Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan a “manic, irresponsible and highly irrational” act by the United States, according to state broadcaster CCTV.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Signs Of Ukraine Export Stability As 4 More Grain Ships Leave Ports

SUNDAY, AUG 07, 2022 - 06:00 PM
This weekend saw four more ships carrying grain and sunflower oil depart Ukraine ports through the UN-brokered safe maritime corridor in the Black Sea, overseen by a joint coordination center in Istanbul staffed by Ukrainian, Russian, Turkish and UN officials.

This as the Razoni cargo ship which was the first to depart Odesa carrying 27,000 tonnes of corn last week, is making its way to the Lebanese port of Tripoli, though not on time. The latest series of ships departed the ports of Odesa and Chornomorsk on Sunday, and their sailing has given rise to greater hopes of export stability, BBC reports, as millions in Ukraine-grain dependent countries are facing famine conditions.

Two of the vessels are reportedly bound for Italy, while the other pair are going to China, after they are expected to dock in Turkey for international inspections under the terms of the UN safety corridor deal. In total they've been estimated to be laden with 160,000 tons of corn and other foodstuffs.

The BBC writes, "Ukrainian authorities say there are good signs that the grain exports are safe, and have urged companies to return to the country's ports." And further: "The hope is that the exports will help ease the global food crisis while bringing in much needed foreign currency."

And according to further details in NBC, referring to the Joint Coordination Center in Istanbul, "The JCC said late on Saturday it had authorized the departure of a total of five new vessels through the Black Sea corridor: four vessels outbound from Chornomorsk and Odesa carrying 161,084 metric tons of produce, and one inbound."

Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky visited Odessa port to oversee the departure of the first grain ship under the UN deal, though he suggested Russia could be trying to sabotage the agreed upon export mechanisms.

1659921728704.png

"It is important for us that Ukraine remains the guarantor of global food security," he had said at the time, given a recent Russian missile strike on Odessa.

The question of the safety of shipping crews also remains a concern, given the ships must navigate waters which have for months seen explosive mines placed off Ukraine's coast. The Razoni's safe passage through the Black Sea days ago was a big milestone showing the UN safety mechanisms can work.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Entertainment Companies Start Dumping Woke Content As Viewership Tumbles

They'll never admit to it openly, but getting woke makes companies broke.

Hollywood has been overtly progressive for decades, but this is nothing compared to the social justice invasion since 2016. After around five years of an unprecedented leftist onslaught on the entertainment industry we are finally starting to see the rampage lose oxygen. There's a weakness within woke productions that the alternative media has been pointing out for a long time – They don't make a profit because they are designed to appease a minority of leftist zennials that don't have any money. This is the wrong crowd to rely on for cash flow.

It is fair to say that the entertainment industry was partially conned. First, there are those tantalizing ESG loans that can be easily had as long a company loudly declares their fealty to the social justice agenda. Then, of course, there is the fact that many corporate CEOs and marketing people track Twitter trends with the ignorant assumption that Twitter is actually a reflection of the real world. The woke mob on Twitter is amplified by the company itself, while most contrary voices are stifled and buried. Anyone using the Twitter echo chamber as a marketing gauge would be led to believe that leftist ideology is the prevailing ideology of the nation. It's not even close.

Some companies are finally realizing this fact and are taking action to reduce their exposure to woke content, or otherwise perish from loss of viewership.

Here's the thing – Leftists could take over every platform for media distribution (they almost have), but they still can't force the public to consume woke content.

Eventually, the loss of viewers and profits is going to hurt their bottom line.

Warner Media (now owned by Discovery) seems to be on the forefront of the purge of leftist content. Under chief executive David Zaslav, Discovery is aggressively dissecting Warner to understand why a company with so many iconic brands and franchises is continually failing at the box office and on streaming. Zaslav is now dumping far left content like the poison it is.

Most notably, Zaslav was behind the torching of news service CNN+ after less than a month of operation when it utterly failed to pull in subscribers. Now, he has shelved the $100 million 'Batgirl' movie, a woke travesty with woke directors which test audiences hated. He is also reportedly cutting the impending Supergirl movie, which rumors indicate was designed to replace the beloved Superman franchise with a female version played by a race swapped actress of Colombian descent (the original Supergirl is supposed to be white and blonde).
Another event that shocked leftists was Netflix taking an ax to "First Kill," a lesbian vampire series that no one asked for and apparently no one watched.

This was after Netflix canceled a host of woke programming in the past couple of months, including a show called “Anti-Racist Baby” written by well known Critical Race Theory propagandist Ibram X. Kendi, and another animated show called “Q-Force” (Queer Force).

HBO Max recently canceled their "Gordita Chronicles" after only one season; the show based on a Dominican immigrant family heavily pushed leftist narratives of victim group status and depicted America as a racist and oppressive nation. No mention of the fact that millions of non-white people try to sneak into the US every year even though it is supposedly “bigoted.”

The examples of purged woke programming go on and on. This is a smart move by the entertainment media as audiences make it clear with their dollars and their viewership that they don't want to watch leftist garbage. However, is it too little too late?

Some companies like Disney have chosen to foolishly double down on woke content (after numerous box office failures) and others like Warner have lost a lot of good will from their customers. Corporations and marketing people have long sought to entice customers by researching what audiences want. But, the new model is to simply TELL customers what to buy, and shame audiences into compliance with a product if they don't like it. Since 2016 the strategy of media has been to ATTACK customers in response to criticism rather than listening and learning. This hasn't gone over well. Today these businesses are paying the price for their trespasses against the free market.

It is unlikely that they will be able to win back audiences anytime soon, if ever.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BREAKING: Gov. Ron DeSantis Suspends Lawless Soros-Backed State Attorney Andrew Warren

By Brian Lupo
Published August 4, 2022 at 12:05pm

Governor Ron DeSantis has taken a pro-active stance to protect the citizens of Florida from rogue prosecutors who are picking and choosing which laws to enforce, often openly doing so in the name of “social justice”. Late this morning, with numerous law enforcement representatives including the well-known Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd, Governor DeSantis announced, effective immediately, the suspension of State Attorney Andrew Warren of Florida’s 13th Judicial District.

After the lawlessness that has been documented throughout many major cities across the United States over the last couple of years, including by The Gateway Pundit, Ron DeSantis took the initiative earlier this year of asking staff to ensure it would not happen in the State of Florida. They were tasked with speaking with “law enforcement and line prosecutors throughout the state”. According to Governor DeSantis, it all led back to the 13th Judicial Circuit in Hillsboro County, where law enforcement has been frustrated by criminals being let go and crimes not being prosecuted.

Gov. DeSantis stated, “We’ve seen across this country over the last few years, individual prosecutors take it upon themselves to determine which laws they like and will enforce, and which laws they don’t like and won’t enforce. The results of this in cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco have been catastrophic. You can go in [a store] in San Francisco and steal a certain amount of merchandise and by definition you would not be prosecuted…”

Gov. DeSantis continued: “Those who say this represents social justice, look at San Francisco. They had to recall this prosecutor who was funded by people like George Soros, saying he’s not going to prosecute. They did the recall election and he was recalled, even in a very liberal jurisdiction. But, the places that voted to keep him were the affluent communities who are not bearing the brunt of the policies. The places that voted to recall him are the working class communities, because they bear the burden of ignorance and refusal to enforce the law.”

In June 2021, State Attorney Warren signed a letter that said he would not enforce a prohibition on any sex change operations for minors.

According to Gov. DeSantis “Warren said that it doesn’t matter what the legislature does in the state of Florida. He is going to exercise a veto over that. He’s also instituted policies of ‘presumptive non-enforcement’…that is not consistent with the role of a prosecutor. You can exercise discretion in individual case, but that discretion has to be individualized and case specific. Most recently…after Dobbs…he signed a letter saying he would not enforce ANY laws relating to the protecting the right to life in the State of Florida. Mind you, we have had prohibitions on third trimester abortions for a long time. We’ve had prohibitions on partial birth abortions for a long time, and then most recently, the legislature enacted, and I signed protections for unborn babies at three and a half months. When they are aborted, its typically done through a dismemberment procedure, which is really inhumane.”

This seems to be a stern rebuke of the lawless prosecutors that have surged over the last several years and message from the DeSantis administration that this type of lawlessness will not be tolerated in the Sunshine State.

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1yNGaYgnRbDGj 49:03 min

^^^^^
Significance of Gov. DeSantis’ decision 7:06 min

Significance of Gov. DeSantis’ decision (Lionel Nation)
One America News Network Published August 7, 2022

Diving deeper into Florida Gov. Ron Desantis suspending a (George Soros funded) State Attorney, One America’s Natasha Sweatte speaks with a legal and media analyst for more insight.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

As Democrats in US Senate Unilaterally Pass $369 Billion Climate Blowout – Study Finds 96% of the Data Used to Support Democrat Bill Is Flawed
By Jim Hoft
Published August 7, 2022 at 9:19am

gore-gif-1.gif


In December 2008, politician Al Gore predicted the North Polar Ice Cap would be completely ice-free in five years.

Gore made the prediction in front of a German audience on December 13, 2008. The Gateway Pundit reported on this at the time.

This wasn’t the only time Al Gore made his ice-free prediction. Gore had been predicting this dire scenario since 2007.

Of course, this was just fear mongering and the North Pole is still covered with ice 13 years later.

In 2021 Arctic sea ice melt was at its lowest level in 15 years. Antarctic sea ice was above average.

In January 2021, Democrat mouthpiece Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced that life on the planet is going to end in 12 years unless the US addresses the threat of global warming.

We have less than 11 years left according to AOC.

On Saturday the US Senate passed a $369 billion deal for the “climate emergency” agenda. The legislation is not even based on factual data.

And they passed this behemoth in a straight party line vote during a recession.

With Senator Krysten Sinema’s approval, the last Democrat holdout for the Manchin-Schumer deal they called “The Inflation Reduction Act”, has finally given in to the $369 billion climate blowout.

Half of the funds raised by this deal will come from Americans earning less than $400,000 according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Even worse, a new study at The Heartland Institutue shows that 96% of climate data used to justify this climate push is flawed. Climate experts have consistently pushed back against climate alarmist narratives.

Via The Heartland Institute.

A new study, Corrupted Climate Stations: The Official U.S. Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed, finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations used to measure climate change fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable” and uncorrupted placement by its own published standards.

The report, published by The Heartland Institute, was compiled via satellite and in-person survey visits to NOAA weather stations that contribute to the “official” land temperature data in the United States. The research shows that 96% of these stations are corrupted by localized effects of urbanization – producing heat-bias because of their close proximity to asphalt, machinery, and other heat-producing, heat-trapping, or heat-accentuating objects. Placing temperature stations in such locations violates NOAA’s own published standards (see section 3.1 at this link), and strongly undermines the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends in the United States.

“With a 96 percent warm-bias in U.S. temperature measurements, it is impossible to use any statistical methods to derive an accurate climate trend for the U.S.” said Heartland Institute Senior Fellow Anthony Watts, the director of the study. “Data from the stations that have not been corrupted by faulty placement show a rate of warming in the United States reduced by almost half compared to all stations.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXCLUSIVE: Unmasking the Biden-Harris Administration’s International Human Trafficking Disaster – Interviews with Illegal Migrants
By Joe Hoft
Published August 7, 2022 at 1:00pm

Guest Post by Bob Bishop

The government media complex uses the January 6th kangaroo trial and the Ukraine war as weapons of mass distraction suppressing reporting on the illegal alien invasion. George Rodriguez, a Conservative Spanish Talk Show Host, and I conducted numerous interviews of illegal migrants, including hours of videotaping providing the public insight into international human trafficking.

The interviews occurred at San Antonio’s new Migrant Resource Center (funded by FEMA), the strategic depot for interstate trafficking of illegal aliens throughout the USA. Like other sanctuary cities, San Antonio is now being overwhelmed by the influx.

The interviews are firsthand accounts of their hazardous journey and inhumane treatment while migrating to the USA, not anecdotal. The migrants we spoke with were highly motivated due to the Biden-Harris Administration’s open border no longer requiring VISAs.

Most migrants encountered were Venezuelans and sometimes ex-pat Cubans seeking better opportunities. They are economic migrants like those from Central America who don’t qualify for asylum. The Migrant Resource Center warehouses those without sponsors. It ultimately releases them from custody to seek a US destination, which often leaves them homeless.

The migrants interviewed spoke only Spanish, were uneducated, impoverished, and lacked vocational skills making assimilation extremely challenging. The interview video clips with English closed captions are linked HERE or HERE with accompanying descriptions providing context.

One man from Venezuela would not recommend immigrating to the US.

View: https://youtu.be/4jT6t0Te7Vs
5:44 min

One Cuban woman was robbed by Mexican police and physically assaulted.

View: https://youtu.be/GEgA8dlkhRs
2:04 min

Watching the clips, one cannot help but feel empathic towards the migrants suffering from harsh conditions, theft, extortion, and violence—their extreme hardships caused by the callousness of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Wild West open borders.

Perilous Migrant Routes


The migrants must pass through the dangerous Darién Gap en route to the USA. The lawless Darién Gap is the geographic region between Colombia and Panama. Without roads, migrants must traverse treacherous mountains, rivers, swamps, and tropical forests that stretch for sixty miles. Those with sufficient funds can bypass the Darién Gap by boat from Carroto, Colombia, to Colón, Panama.

Interviewees uniformly shared stories of witnessing thugs robbing, assaulting, raping, and murdering migrants. Migrants that suffered injuries, became seriously ill, or ran out of provisions were left stranded in the jungle to die.

Once exiting the Gap, migrants take a layover at the UN migrant encampment Las Peñitas, co-funded by the USAID NGO using US tax dollars. Then they travel along the Pan-American Highway route along the west coast to Tapachula, Mexico, passing through the open borders of Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala. Travel caravans swell into thousands as they gather migrants from Central America.

There is a visa office 25 miles north of Tapachula at Huixtla, where migrants wait 30 days or more for a VISA to travel across Mexico to the US border. Migrants, out of frustration over slow delays in getting VISAs, attempted to take over the immigration office and blocked roads.

The final predation gauntlet is from Monterey, Mexico, which is absolute hell. The unrestrained police collected bribes, robbed, and tortured the migrants. Piling on is the Sinaloa Cartel, Mexico’s dominant drug cartel, along with smaller competing cartels. The Mexican drug cartels will get more muscular with the bounty from human trafficking, further destabilizing Mexico and, ultimately, the US Southwest.

The rigorous physical challenges and risk of death explain why most migrants are young males. Many migrants recommend others not to follow due to the cruel hardships, and some instead suggest applying for a VISA.

Military Division Sized Caravans


The large caravans, the size of a military division, are not organic but professionally organized to intimidate law enforcement and attempt to limit predation. Periodic aid stations funded by co-conspirators, the UN, NGOs, and charities along the daily route provide water, food, thermal blankets, drugs, hygiene kits, emergency medical relief, and other essentials. Armies don’t march on empty stomachs. The Media never films the aid stations and transitory shelters that would reveal the complicit organizations.

The large caravans are an ideal incubator for common or novel infectious diseases like TB, zika, malaria, pertussis, influenza, etc. It won’t be monkeypox putting an unprecedented strain on the US health system.

Pueblo Sin Fronteras (Towns Without Borders) provides the leadership for many caravans. News media avoids photos and videos of yellow-vested leaders, giving an impression of the caravans being spontaneous.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1053978655980969984
.13 min

Pueblo Sin Fronteras is a pseudo charity, and donations made on its website go to the ultra-radical Alliance for Global Justice. Alliance’s website discloses it is in solidarity with Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua Marxist regimes. Things that make you go, Hmmm…

Aiding & Abetting Human Trafficking

Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Homeland Security Director Alejandro Mayorkas took an unheralded trip to Panama on April 18, 2022, to coordinate migration. Also attending was Blas Nunez Neto, USAID NGO Assistant Administrator. The two-day trip came weeks before the Biden-Harris Administration ended Title 42, prohibiting unlawful entrance into the country.

USAID, CIA-founded, announced on June 10, 2022, a $314 million aid package of humanitarian assistance specifically targeting Venezuelan migrants. The funding provides migrants with hot meals, cash transfers, food vouchers, and food kits. It is no accident we are seeing a surge of Venezuelan migrants in San Antonio.

De facto Citizenship

Illegal migrants rely on phony asylum claims to be immediately granted an unsecured bond and released. The migrant is assigned a future court date for permanent residence. Since migrants stay over a year, they are eligible for welfare entitlements and ultimately become permanent wards of the US.

The Biden-Harris Administration wants to provide ID Cards and a mobile app allowing illegal aliens to open bank accounts and obtain driver’s licenses. A driver’s license would lead to voter registration fraud. Homeland Security claims the app would manage and track migration as part of a “smart border,” and a border wall and detention camps are unnecessary.

“We are working tirelessly to rebuild our immigration system,” ~ said Treasonous Homeland Security Director Mayorkas.

Biden-Harris’s Gandhi-Like Migration


In 1947, India gained its independence as a British colony. Mahatma Gandhi, India’s independence leader, moved to partition India into a Muslim state (Pakistan) and a Hindu state (India). He put into motion one of the greatest catastrophic migrations. The immigration strategy resulted in a calamity of uprooting over 15 million people, decimating between one to two million Indians.

The Biden-Harris open borders policy hasn’t reached the level of India’s great migration; it has resulted in tens of thousands of migrants traumatized and dead. That total will continue to grow with the wide-open border policy. It is a Cloward–Piven strategy of creating an overwhelming crisis using unarmed, mostly military-age male migrants as an invading force.

The Biden-Harris Administration, run by Marxist technocrats, relies on Western empathy preventing state officials and citizens from protecting the border against passive and defenseless migrants. The ultimate goal is to erase American citizenship and borders to achieve the naïve global utopia run by elites like Canada’s effete Justin Trudeau.

Dr. Michael Savage’s Prognosis


Dr. Savage’s thought-provoking “Borders, Language, and Culture” tome defines a nation. Without borders or the rule of law, America cannot survive.

Bob Bishop and George Rodriguez are residents of San Antonio, Texas
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAmY5MqaDC0&pp=wgIGCgQQAhgB

13:33 min

EXPLAINED: George Soros’ money is RUINING American cities


Glenn Beck


Thankfully, many are beginning to realize the DANGEROUS influence that billionaire George Soros and his money have on elections and politics in the U.S. In fact, Soros-backed prosecutors and Attorney Generals have RUINED several of America’s biggest cities, riddling them with crime and chaos. Soros, possibly feeling the heat, recently took to the Wall Street Journal to defend his practices. But his words won’t fool Glenn. In this clip, Glenn reads the op-ed and explains why Soros' money should be BANNED from America for GOOD.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment

With Passing of the “Inflation Reduction Act,” We’re Witnessing a Case of Economic Murder-Suicide

There have been some bad economic decisions made over the past year-and-a-half, but arguably none are as bad as this. It's time to brace for financial impact if you haven't already.

BY JD RUCKER August 7, 2022 in America First Original, Opinions
Inflation Reduction Act (1)

When the “Inflation Reduction Act” is signed by Joe Biden, two major crimes will have been initiated. First, they will be murdering the U.S. economy, sending millions of struggling Americans into deeper financial despair. Second, since the effects will be felt by voters before the midterms, Democrats are essentially committing electoral suicide.

As they say, “It’s the economy, stupid.”

Before any Republicans cheer about the latter, we have to understand the implications of the former. Democrats were already hurting electorally, so they’re throwing up a Hail Mary that has zero chance of reaching the end zone. But they’re doing it anyway, and that’s a major concern because it seems they’re continuing the trend we’ve seen for the last year-and-a-half: A political party doing the bidding of the globalist elites to damage the U.S. economy beyond repair and hoping their corporate media propaganda machine can spin it for them.

Republicans winning in November will be a Pyrrhic victory at best. But it’s probably much worse than that — very little victory at all — because with feckless RINOs Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy likely running their respective chambers, it’s a near certainty they’ll be unable to get a single thing done to reverse the damage this bill will do. Instead, they’ll just obstruct the Biden-Harris agenda which is a good thing, but they won’t do much more than fundraise off it. They’ll talk big and pretend to be tough which will help them score even more electoral victories in 2024 for fellow RINOs, should we even make it as a nation until then.

Get ready for two years of bellyaching just like we heard from McConnell and Paul Ryan during the Obama era. They pretended to be tough and passed conservative bills like the many Obamacare repeal pieces of legislation because they knew they would get vetoed. The moment they had someone in the Oval Office who would actually sign them, suddenly they were unable to put a single Obamacare bill on the president’s desk for two years. That’s the type of fake leadership we’ll be seeing if the GOP Establishment replaces their fellow Uniparty Swamp leaders after the midterms.

So no, I’m not excited about gaining seats in Congress in exchange for this abomination of a bill. We’ll be watching our nation’s remaining fiscal strength drained in exchange for two years of RINO Kabuki Theater.

The article below by Richard Stern from Daily Signal details pretty concisely why this bill is bad in the short term and worse in the long term. Naming it the “Inflation REDUCTION Act” is like naming naming a hangman’s noose a “Neck Protective Covering.” In both cases, the name is the opposite of what it will actually do. Inflation will rise, perhaps faster than it has in recent months, because you can’t raise corporate taxes and expect costs to go down. Wall Street will lurch. Meanwhile, the people will continue to struggle:

**
Gimmicks in ‘Inflation Reduction Act’ Mask True Costs, Massive Inflationary Deficits

As Senate Democrats achieve their goal of jamming through the so-called Inflation Reduction Act, reality is becoming clear: The bill will likely increase near-term inflation, depress household incomes, and produce the long-term deficits that fuel long-term inflation.

Using the Congressional Budget Office’s latest scoring, estimates of the most recent changes, and accounting for very expensive gimmicks, it’s likely that the bill will produce deficits.

The cumulative deficit would be around $52.5 billion over the next four years, at least $110 billion through fiscal year 2031, and more beyond. That would mean adding to near-term and long-term inflationary pressures, in contrast to what proponents such as Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., claim.

In short, the bill is about as far away from a genuine Inflation Reduction Act as possible. Though it would be harmful under any circumstances, signing it into law during a period of stagflation would be the worst possible timing.

The Inflation Reduction Act utilizes three major sets of common congressional gimmicks to mask its true costs: cherry-picked expiration dates, ignoring net interest costs, and indirect tax burdens.

As one very costly example, the bill would extend for three more years “temporary” Obamacare subsidies that were supposed to expire this year. That brings to mind the wisdom of the late economist Milton Friedman, who once observed, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.”

Despite the Obamacare subsidies being peddled as temporary, extending them was among the first provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act that Senate Democrats committed to voting for. It just goes to prove something the everyone knows: There are certain taxpayer-funded handouts and giveaways that seem to always get extended in perpetuity.

To keep the reported cost of the provision down, a three-year expansion was chosen because it is what they could afford on paper. However, accounting for political reality, these subsidies will likely cost at least $146.5 billion more than what is being reported through fiscal year 2031.

That would be further compounded by Congress yet again delaying implementation of the Trump-era Medicare rebate rule, a move that shifts federal costs further into the future and arbitrarily reduces the portion of the costs included in the budgetary window. While the future costs would remain real, they would conveniently slip under the radar of the formal score.

Yet another overestimation of savings presented by the bill’s authors is a claim to $204 billion in increased revenues from cracking down on tax fraud.

While increased enforcement activity might result in higher revenue collections, estimates are highly speculative. Because the actual results are so uncertain, such revenues are not included in official cost estimates under the bipartisan scorekeeping guidelines.

The deficits created by the bill, and the fact that they are front-loaded, would increase federal net interest costs by more than $14 billion—a fact that is not reflected in the formal CBO estimates.

In total, the bill would add at least $110 billion to the federal deficit through fiscal 2031. To put that level of spending in perspective, $110 billion is roughly four-and-a-half times NASA’s annual budget, or nearly the cost of the ships in six U.S. Carrier Strike Groups. In this case, however, the $110 billion will be used to buy more inflation.

When the federal government runs a deficit, it eventually must be paid back. That’s either done through job- and wage-killing taxes or by way of the Federal Reserve printing new money to finance the deficits.

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed financed 56% of new federal debt with trillions upon trillions of newly created dollars. Those dollars devalued paychecks and Americans’ lifetime savings. When the federal government attempts to print its way out of fiscal irresponsibility, it does so by imposing an inflation tax on every American household.

With that precedent, no one can be certain of how much the federal government will use new taxes or new money creation to cover deficits. The expectation of future money printing causes immediate inflationary pressures as people act now to mitigate such future possibilities.

As such, the deficits created by the Inflation Reduction Act would simply be the newest addition to the current inflation tax.

To add insult to injury, almost every provision of the bill will bleed the bank accounts of American families. Tragically, the deficit- and inflation-increasing aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act are only the beginning of its burdens.

In these provisions we find the third set of gimmicks; namely, indirect tax burdens. Despite President Joe Biden’s assurances, the tax and price-control burdens of the Inflation Reduction Act will fall squarely on families trying to make ends meet.

Companies are combinations of workers, tools, and institutional knowledge that when brought together can produce the goods and services we need and enjoy. As such, companies can’t absorb a tax. They only direct how American households will feel it.

The bill’s business-tax hike will leave companies with no choice but to cut wages, increase consumer prices, or cut future investments in a growing and prosperous economy. The bill’s requirement that the government get a deal on drug prices will simply mean that drug prices will go up for families and that research budgets for new lifesaving drugs will be slashed.

The stock-buyback tax will trap capital with stagnant companies and will prevent investors from reallocating those funds to new, growing, and innovative ventures. The $80 billion IRS slush fund in the bill will go to “enforcement” activities that will likely target low-income families and minority populations.

In reality, this bill is a litany of policies aimed at scoring political points that has been recklessly and hurriedly slapped together. If it’s signed into law as expected, long after the press conferences and congressional pats on the back have faded into distant memory, it’s inflationary, tax, and other burdens will continue to haunt every American household.
 
Top