Navydad
Inactive
Navydad, your sense of humor IMO is priceless.
I miss your sarcasm.
Navydad, your sense of humor IMO is priceless.
My point is, did they agree on confidentiality beforehand? Or did Bush just assume?
I don't expect my conversations with others to remain private unless I have specifically requested the friend's confidence. Otherwise they have every right to repeat anything I say, and I'm a fool to say it out loud if I don't want it known.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Obama to send senior staff into federal agencies
MARK HENNESSY in Washington
UNITED STATES president-elect Barack Obama is to send over 100 senior staff - who had been given security clearance by the Secret Service in advance of election day - into federal agencies this week as preparations for his move to the White House intensify.
The decision to have staff vetted in advance, under legislation brought into force in 2004, is an illustration of the preparations taken by the Obama campaign not to repeat mistakes made during transitions in the past by winners of White House races.
A core team of up to 50 advisers has been working for months in considerable secrecy in planning for the first months of the Obama presidency, including actions necessary to reverse a series of actions taken by President George W Bush.
In particular, Mr Obama has closely studied the transition arrangements made by President Bill Clinton in late 1992 and early 1993, which are generally accepted to have been disastrous and which hampered his first 18 months in office.
Mr Obama has already appointed Representative Rahm Emanuel as chief-of-staff and other announcements about senior appointments are expected to follow in an orderly fashion over coming weeks.
In a radio broadcast on Saturday, president-elect Obama signalled that he intends to move quickly on a range of fronts immediately after his inauguration: "I want to ensure that we hit the ground running on January 20th because we don't have a moment to lose."
Mr Obama and his wife, Michelle, will travel from Chicago, where they have spent the days since the election, to Washington today to meet President Bush and his wife, Laura, for talks on the handover. Under Mr Bush's orders, his senior officials have already handed over voluminous files that have been in preparation for the last year on key policies to ensure that his successor "can get off to a quick start".
Given the size of the electoral mandate he enjoys, the new president has freedom to act on many fronts, but he will have to ensure that he does not act on too many at one time lest he suffer embarrassing defeats.
However, Mr Obama is still planning an ambitious agenda: "We can't afford to wait on moving forward on the key priorities that I identified during the campaign, including clean energy, health care, education and tax relief for middle-class families," he said on Saturday.
Senior Obama aides have already taken offices in the treasury department, where they are working alongside treasury secretary Henry Paulson as efforts continue to kick-start the US economy back into life.
John Podesta, who is co-chairing the Obama transition team, said the incoming administration was reviewing President Bush's orders on stem cell research, oil and gas drilling, and others matters that could be immediately reversed by decree.
Praising President Bush, Mr Podesta, who previously served as President Clinton's chief of staff, said the co-operation from the White House had "been excellent. We have had a collegial and co-operative relationship."
The director of national intelligence, Mike McConnell, has already briefed the incoming president, while national security agency staff are to hold meetings this week with Mr Obama's team.
You are kidding, right? Two men go into a room to talk one-on-one, no one else is there, it is obviously a private setting. The meeting was IMPLICITLY private, and it should have been obvious that the content of the conversation was private.
C'mon, FL. This was DUMB of Obama, no matter how you wish to rationalize it.
Bush doesn't have the right to tell other people when they can talk. He's gotten to used to the idea that he does.
He should just not speak to people if he doesn't want to be quoted.
Obama's supporters really said that? After their main complaint about Mrs. Palin being that she was too inexperienced to be in the White House? What colossal hypocrites.The president didn't tell Obama not to talk, but he did show his irritation at the breach of protocol. O's supporter's said he can just get on-the-job training.
fruit loop said:Bush doesn't have the right to tell other people when they can talk. He's gotten to used to the idea that he does.
He should just not speak to people if he doesn't want to be quoted.
That will make for an unpleasant and dangerous transition I would expect.
The next two months should be putting politics aside for what's in the best interest of the country, Bush hasn't forgotten that and I expect Obama will never figure it out.
Monty
It's called decorum, FL. It may be expected that the conversations remain private, and he ignores it. That's certainly his perogative. It would be the president's perogative to have no more transition discussions, if Obama can't control himself.
The president didn't tell Obama not to talk, but he did show his irritation at the breach of protocol. O's supporter's said he can just get on-the-job training. In this particular episode, he just delivered himself a big box of FAIL. He'll either learn from it, or he won't. Other countries and world powers learned something from it, I assure you.END QUOTE
yeah. and when they hold obama's feet to the fire in some 2009 version of the Bay of Pigs, while he's in his on-the-job training, he'll blink. he's an appeaser.
at least carter had the "down-home" image, before he kow-towed to the arabs while they held our servicemen.
the 52 percenters elected for all of us a pig in a poke.
breezyhill
The president is a public servant and, with a few exceptions, shouldn't be saying anything that the American people don't have a right to hear.
They give up job-related privacy when they're elected.
Bush has gotten to used to secret memos, secret conversations, and no accountability.
The president is a public servant and, with a few exceptions, shouldn't be saying anything that the American people don't have a right to hear.
They give up job-related privacy when they're elected.
Bush has gotten to used to secret memos, secret conversations, and no accountability.
Telegraph, Telephone, Telebambam.King Bam-Bam and His Royal Posse. No class.
The president is a public servant and, with a few exceptions, shouldn't be saying anything that the American people don't have a right to hear.
They give up job-related privacy when they're elected.
Bush has gotten to used to secret memos, secret conversations, and no accountability.
The president is a public servant and, with a few exceptions, shouldn't be saying anything that the American people don't have a right to hear.
They give up job-related privacy when they're elected.
Bush has gotten to used to secret memos, secret conversations, and no accountability.
Exactly..it's still Bush's fault...keep singing it, won't be able to much longer and Obama will be in the big house
Monty
The president is a public servant and, with a few exceptions, shouldn't be saying anything that the American people don't have a right to hear.
They give up job-related privacy when they're elected.
Bush has gotten to used to secret memos, secret conversations, and no accountability.
"Bush indicated at the meeting that he might support some aid and a broader economic stimulus package if Obama and congressional Democrats dropped their opposition to a free-trade agreement with Colombia,"
How long is it gonna be before Obama leaks top secret intel to our enemies??
I think he's already done it!!
Bush doesn't have the right to tell other people when they can talk. He's gotten to used to the idea that he does.
He should just not speak to people if he doesn't want to be quoted.
How long is it gonna be before Obama leaks top secret intel to our enemies??
I think he's already done it!!
Oh, and BTW, some jihadist boards are already talking about this.
Maureen
Rahm Emanual was one of the worst leakers for the Clintons, now he's right back up there in the same position.I'd say Obama himself is the one who should be very upset about this. He apparently has some loose lips within his top aides and that is very dangerous for him.
"Bush indicated at the meeting that he might support some aid and a broader economic stimulus package if Obama and congressional Democrats dropped their opposition to a free-trade agreement with Colombia," claimed the TIMES.
10-4. For once, I have to say the splodeydopes are a helluva lot smarter than we are right about now!
No Book of Secrets for you!!!
Monty
This calls to mind the phone chat he had with the Canadian official and also makes me wonder why the conversations he had with Mid East leaders during the world tour were held so private. Something's rubbing me the wrong way.
My point is, did they agree on confidentiality beforehand? Or did Bush just assume?
I don't expect my conversations with others to remain private unless I have specifically requested the friend's confidence. Otherwise they have every right to repeat anything I say, and I'm a fool to say it out loud if I don't want it known.