POL They're Going To Let Trump Win

B

bracketquant

Veteran Member
2dollarbill said:
sounds like gooblespeak from MSM. Trump was denied the ability to govern as an executive that controlled both houses of congress. His supposedly own party was full of undercover progressives that denied him the platform he ran on which was constitutional. He didn't ask for anything "extra" as you implied. Fake news pal.
Click to expand...
A President has no constitutional business planning a budget, or instituting any policy on his own, for starters. His duty is to see that the establish laws, made by Congress, and signed by him or any previous President, are carried out. He is not a law maker.

He wanted to build a wall, and have Mexico pay for it. What clause of the Constitution covers that?
 
B

bracketquant

Veteran Member
Samuel Adams said:
Once an election is confirmed “stolen”, in a representative constitutional republic, all you ever get, thereafter, is a dangling carrot on a string.

Just keep chasing that carrot.

They like that.
Click to expand...
The best take on the carrot dangling from a stick approach that I ever heard, was from a ruthless businessman.

He said that he takes the carrot, and shoves it partway up the ass of a competitor. He then hammers it in with the stick. No strings attached.
 
2dollarbill

2dollarbill

Veteran Member
bracketquant said:
A President has no constitutional business planning a budget, or instituting any policy on his own, for starters. His duty is to see that the establish laws, made by Congress, and signed by him or any previous President, are carried out. He is not a law maker.

He wanted to build a wall, and have Mexico pay for it. What clause of the Constitution covers that?
Click to expand...
Really, that's the best you have? That is called protecting his country. Mexico paying for it, was part of him protecting this country, our country, unless you don't consider this your country. Maybe you have an interest in Mexico, sure sounds like it.
As far as the constitution goes, Mexico has been pushing the limits on ours and it's time a USA President stands up for it.
 
Ractivist

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
tiredude said:
If they do…… very good chance……. He would die in office of the stress…… his VP pick will be HUGE!
Click to expand...
I suspect you'd see a version of Trump that looked and sounded a lot like Patton. He would rise to the occasion. And I'd be fine with him locking up the communists......and pulling some levers.
 
B

bracketquant

Veteran Member
2dollarbill said:
Really, that's the best you have? That is called protecting his country. Mexico paying for it, was part of him protecting this country, our country, unless you don't consider this your country. Maybe you have an interest in Mexico, sure sounds like it.
As far as the constitution goes, Mexico has been pushing the limits on ours and it's time a USA President stands up for it.
Click to expand...
The best that I have is politely asking you again what clause in the Constitution gives the President the power to build that wall and have the Mexicans pay for it. If you deflect again, well you just don't appear to be serious about We The People trying to stop those, who don't believe in the constitutional Republic, from their attempts to overthrow us from within.

Why does it sure sound like to you, that I have an interest in Mexico, a country that is responsible for the invasion of our country? I don't know what form of logic you are able to process, but a USA President cannot stand up for the Constitution, while at the same time violating it. I don't doubt your patriotism. It just sounds like you are confused, and are not sure of anything.
 
subnet

subnet

Boot
Nah, they have had over 8 years to wargame and perfect the steal, i wont be suprised if the dems magically take it all and claim a mandate.
 
2dollarbill

2dollarbill

Veteran Member
2dollarbill said:
Really, that's the best you have? That is called protecting his country. Mexico paying for it, was part of him protecting this country, our country, unless you don't consider this your country. Maybe you have an interest in Mexico, sure sounds like it.
As far as the constitution goes, Mexico has been pushing the limits on ours and it's time a USA President stands up for it.
Click to expand...
Where does it say specifically in the Constitution the President has the right to do anything? It doesn't, except to faithfully execute the laws of this country. Making Mexico pay for a wall was done thru tariffs in case you missed it. He also had congress pass spending legislation to help pay for it. Once again all legal. Why are you so hung up on wall spending, I can think of a hundred other things Trump should have done differently and it would have been better for this country. One issue, and it isn't even correctly applied.
 
B

bracketquant

Veteran Member
2dollarbill said:
Where does it say specifically in the Constitution the President has the right to do anything? It doesn't, except to faithfully execute the laws of this country. Making Mexico pay for a wall was done thru tariffs in case you missed it. He also had congress pass spending legislation to help pay for it. Once again all legal. Why are you so hung up on wall spending, I can think of a hundred other things Trump should have done differently and it would have been better for this country. One issue, and it isn't even correctly applied.
Click to expand...
The Constitution is about delegated powers of the elected, not about their rights to do anything.

What about Trump's supposed attempt to overthrow the election, and therefore the Constitution, by trying to have substitute State electors?

I don't bother thinking about the hundreds of things Trump could have done differently that would have made it better for the country, because he failed for the most part at those hundreds of things.
 
2dollarbill

2dollarbill

Veteran Member
bracketquant said:
The Constitution is about delegated powers of the elected, not about their rights to do anything.

What about Trump's supposed attempt to overthrow the election, and therefore the Constitution, by trying to have substitute State electors?

I don't bother thinking about the hundreds of things Trump could have done differently that would have made it better for the country, because he failed for the most part at those hundreds of things.
Click to expand...
It's a lot easier to say "I don't like Trump" than to make up stuff. I got you. Well, I like him for what he tried to do. Some people are doers and some are complainers.
 
Countrymouse

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Dobbin said:
One of my scenarios was them handing Trump Great Depression II.

I.e., if they can't hand over prosperity (by definition a government controlled economy CAN'T produce prosperity) they'll hand over the natural result of a government controlled economy.

Rahm Emanual Quote: You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.

And (Dobbin Corollary) "If you don't have a serious crisis - you create one."

Janet Yellen (Secretary of the Treasury) standing by...

Dobbin
Click to expand...
I've often wondered why, if the left/NWO/Globalists/WEF folks (supported by the alphabets) hate Trump so much, why don't they just off him like they did JFK?

And it occurred to me--they WOULD-if they REALLY wanted him out of the way.

Which means--they DON'T.

Which means they mean to dump on HIM the hell they've created.
 
ChetekTech

ChetekTech

Veteran Member
Yes, President Trump looks to be in great shape to win the election.

In early March of 2020, it appeared that President Trump was easily headed for a second term.

Then, Covid happened.

It's March 2024, stay frosty.
 
West

West

Senior
Well....Deep subject. Muse.....

I've been feeling that I'm stuck in the middle or being played by a good cop, and a bad cop.

Both of which are trying to get me to incriminate my self.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top