ALERT RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE - Consolidated Thread

WTSR

Veteran Member
Samuel Ramani
@SamRamani2

4h

Russia says it is withdrawing from Snake Island as a good will gesture. Just like how it "voluntarily" left Kyiv in early April.


So yes, Snake Island will be abandoned by Russian troops.
Ensuring the defense of an object that is within reach not only of missile systems, but also of cannon artillery, turned out to be very problematic and costly over a long distance.

Nevertheless, the main reason was the lack of reconnaissance and target designation equipment of the operational-tactical level in the arsenal of the fleet and the Aerospace Forces, which would allow effective targeting of aircraft and Caliber. Like, for example, the UAV MQ-9 Reaper.

Tactical UAVs can be launched from the territory of the island, but they do not provide round-the-clock reconnaissance of enemy targets to a sufficient depth, as a result of which it becomes very difficult to hit a maneuverable target.

It is necessary to return the island either when control over the Odessa region is established, or immediately before the signing of a truce. Otherwise, there will be only vain sacrifices.
 

EMICT

Veteran Member
Good observation!

The MSM is already hinting at a draft.
-------------
Every branch of the military is struggling to make its 2022 recruiting goals, officials say

With a record low number of Americans eligible to serve, and few of those willing to do it, this "is the year we question the sustainability of the all-volunteer force,” said an expert.

June 27, 2022, 3:30 AM CDT
By Courtney Kube and Molly Boigon

Every branch of the U.S. military is struggling to meet its fiscal year 2022 recruiting goals, say multiple U.S. military and defense officials, and numbers obtained by NBC News show both a record low percentage of young Americans eligible to serve and an even tinier fraction willing to consider it.

The officials said the Pentagon’s top leaders are now scrambling for ways to find new recruits to fill out the ranks of the all-volunteer force. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks consider the shortfall a serious issue, said the officials, and have been meeting on it frequently with other leaders.

“This is the start of a long drought for military recruiting,” said Ret. Lt. Gen. Thomas Spoehr of the Heritage Foundation, a think tank. He said the military has not had such a hard time signing recruits since 1973, the year the U.S. left Vietnam and the draft officially ended. Spoehr said he does not believe a revival of the draft is imminent, but “2022 is the year we question the sustainability of the all-volunteer force.”

The pool of those eligible to join the military continues to shrink, with more young men and women than ever disqualified for obesity, drug use or criminal records. Last month, Army Chief of Staff Gen. James McConville testified before Congress that only 23% of Americans ages 17-24 are qualified to serve without a waiver to join, down from 29% in recent years.

An internal Defense Department survey obtained by NBC News found that only 9% of those young Americans eligible to serve in the military had any inclination to do so, the lowest number since 2007.

The survey sheds light on how both Americans’ view of the military and the growing civilian-military divide may also be factors in slumping recruitment, and how public attitudes could cause recruiting struggles for years to come.

More than half of the young Americans who answered the survey — about 57% — think they would have emotional or psychological problems after serving in the military. Nearly half think they would have physical problems.

“They think they’re going to be physically or emotionally broken after serving,” said one senior U.S. military official familiar with the recruiting issues, who believes a lack of familiarity with military service contributes to that perception.

Among Americans surveyed by the Pentagon who were in the target age range for recruiting, only 13% had parents who had served in the military, down from approximately 40% in 1995. The military considers parents one of the biggest influencers for service.

An expert on military personnel policy says that middle class parents, including those who are newly middle class, often encourage their kids to go to college before selecting a career, which hurts recruiting for enlisted personnel. “Changing the mind of parents is the really tough part, particularly if these are parents who worked really hard for their children to go to college,” said Kate Kuzminski from the Center for a New American Security. She noted that recruiting ads increasingly target the parents of potential recruits. “That’s where they’re trying to win the hearts and minds.”

Overall confidence in U.S. government institutions is also decreasing, and that has hit the U.S. military as well. In 2021 the annual Reagan National Defense Survey, conducted by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute, found that just 45% of Americans had a great deal of trust and confidence in the military, down 25 points since 2018.

The trend will most likely continue as the overall military shrinks and familiarity with service keeps dropping, say the officials. In 2021, an Army study found that 75% of Americans ages 16-28 knew little to nothing about the Army.

“This recruiting crisis is like a slow-moving wave coming at us,” said one senior defense official involved in recruiting and personnel issues. “As the military has gotten smaller and the public have gotten less and less familiar with those in uniform, it has grown. And Covid accelerated it.”

A Pentagon spokesperson declined to comment.

This year’s numbers so far

The Army has met about 40% of its enlisted recruiting mission for FY22, with just over three months left in the fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30. The final quarter — the summer — is typically when the services recruit the most candidates following high school graduation.

Space Force will also likely make its goal, according to U.S. military officials, but as the newest branch of the military it only looks to recruit about 500 Guardians this fiscal year.

The U.S. Air Force, on the other hand, has to recruit roughly 100 times as many airmen, about 50,000, but is currently more than 4,000 below where it should be at this point in the fiscal year. While the Air National Guard and Reserve are unlikely to meet their goals, the active duty are taking it week to week, according to a senior U.S. military official. “We are hopeful that the active duty will meet their goal. Hopeful, but not certain,” the official said.

The last time the Air Force missed its goal was fiscal 1999, and the last time before that was 1979.

Navy officials, who have been using the summer movie “Top Gun: Maverick” to try to attract recruits, say they hope to ultimately meet their active-duty and overall strength goals.

The active-duty Marine Corps is likely to make its recruiting goals this year. The Marine in charge of manpower, however, recently told Congress that 2022 is “arguably the most challenging recruiting year since the inception of the all-volunteer force.”

The Coast Guard is lagging behind its active-duty numbers for the year. It has met 80% and 93% of its goals for reserves and officers respectively, but has filled only about 55% of its target of 4,200 active-duty enlistments.

How to fix it

To tackle the growing crisis, the Pentagon is reviewing some of the more than 250 disqualifiers for service, including some medical conditions that have historically required recruits to obtain a waiver for service or kept individuals out of uniform completely, according to multiple defense and U.S. military officials.

For example, in the past ailments like asthma and ADHD could disqualify someone from serving if the recruit had symptoms after their 13th or 14th birthdays. But now the Pentagon is reviewing whether individuals who have been asymptomatic for a shorter period of time could join without a waiver.

The military is also discussing allowing service members to use platforms like TikTok to attract recruits. In 2020, President Donald Trump ordered a ban on the use of the social media platform because the Chinese company that owns it collects biometric information on users.

“We have to be where the recruits are, and TikTok is one of the biggest social media platforms in the world,” one defense official involved in personnel issues said.

The Pentagon is also looking to increase recruitment by targeting more influencers like parents, teachers and coaches, by creating recruiting stations with multiple services in them rather than service specific locations, and even moving recruiting offices to better neighborhoods, according to multiple U.S. military and defense officials.

The Pentagon may also put more effort into recruiting eligible DACA recipients, said officials.

Long-term challenges like declining eligibility and trust in the military are only part of the issue, according to defense and U.S. military officials. More recent challenges like a national labor shortage, inflation and the effects of Covid have also affected recruitment. Two years of Covid has led to canceled air shows, a drastic decrease in in-person recruitment efforts, and more people now wanting to work from home.

Kuzminski agrees that Covid hurt recruiting, but adds that another challenge has been political pressure in some school districts not to let recruiters on campuses. Face-to-face meetings can be a powerful incentive to enlist.

Army Secretary Christine Wormuth recently created a recruiting “tiger” team, which meets every two weeks to discuss ways to tackle recruitment.

“The Army, like other services, is facing the most challenging recruiting market in the last 20 years,” Wormuth told NBC News. “I expect these recruiting market headwinds to persist, so the Army must improve how we recruit in this new market environment. In March 2022, the Army began a comprehensive review and analysis of our accessions enterprise, recruiting policy, organizational structure and marketing practices. Recommendations for this review, coupled with other immediate steps we are taking, will help the Army address recruiting challenges and position the Army recruiting for success in the future.”

The Army is offering flexible 2-year to 6-year contracts, duty stations of choice, a program where enlistees can be stationed with their friends, and a $10,000 quick-ship bonus.

Some of the service branches are offering unprecedented bonuses for signing up or re-enlisting, up to $50,000 for certain specialties in the Army, Air Force and the Navy.

But one U.S. military official said bonuses can only help so much. “We can throw money at the problem all we want, but until we change how young people see us in uniform, we are going to struggle to get them to raise their right hands.”

Every branch of the U.S. military is struggling to meet its 2022 recruiting goals, officials say (nbcnews.com)

Concerned Graduates Of West Point Challenge Leadership Of Military Academy: Letter

BY TYLER DURDEN
WEDNESDAY, JUN 29, 2022 - 10:00 PM
Authored by Enrico Trigoso via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Three retired U.S. military officers—LTG Thomas McInerney, USAF; MG Paul Vallely, U.S. Army; and Colonel Andrew O’Meara Jr., U.S. Army—signed a letter authored by “Concerned Graduates of West Point and The Long Gray Line,” protesting against mandatory vaccinations, CRT classes, sanitary conditions, progressive political activism, and other “woke actions,” in the military academy.


U.S. Military Academy cadets attend the 2020 graduation ceremony at West Point, New York, on June 13, 2020. (Timothy A. Clary/AFP via Getty Images)


“The Long Gray Line” refers to the continuum of graduates United States Military Academy at West Point, New York.

“We wanted to challenge the leadership of the Academy and the Defense Dept on their WOKE actions, CRT, Diversity training and the other discrepancies in the Academy. We found it pervasive at the Naval and Air Force Academies so we knew it was directed from the highest levels of our Military Leadership,” Vallely told The Epoch Times.


Paul E Vallely MG US Army (Ret) (Courtesy of Paul E Vallely)


“We all want the Military to get back on track to training and leading our Armed Forces to secure America and its Citizens,” Vallely, who has been sounding the alarm against a socialist takeover of the United States, added.

The letter, titled “Declaration of Betrayal of West Point And the Long Gray Line,” asks for the following information:
  1. An explanation for the irregularities in the enforcement of the Honor Code.
  2. A justification for the mandatory vaccinations of cadets with the COVID Virus despite widespread adverse reactions to the inoculation, as well as provisions for exceptions for cadets with religious objections.
  3. An explanation for teaching Critical Race Theory at the Academy that constitutes an attack upon the Constitution and our constitutional Republic. This is behavior that constitutes unconstitutional conduct, if not sedition.
  4. An explanation of reported mismanagement of the cadet dining facility resulting in unsanitary conditions, inadequate food prepared for the meal, and food served that was reportedly unfit for consumption.
  5. Political activism on the part of civilian faculty members constituting political activity violating the long-standing policy of the Academy and Army Regulations.
  6. The practice of exclusive reliance upon radical progressive guest speakers to address the Corps of Cadets. This practice results in prejudiced political activism on the part of the Staff and Faculty in violation of Army Regulations.
  7. An explanation for the failure of the Superintendent to respond to correspondence inquiring about problems identified at the Academy.
 
AMERICANS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THEIR OWN MILITARY HISTORY

29 June 2022 by Larry Johnson 13 Comments

I believe one of the reasons many Americans carry such negative feelings about the Russians is our collective failure to understand the price Russians paid to defeat Hitler. The sad truth is that most Americans have trouble identifying the warring parties in World War II and generally believe that terrible conflict was settled because of what America did.

The American people are good folk at heart. They genuinely want to help the less fortunate or the beleaguered. But, during the last 75 years, American politicians cynically have used this trait to convince the public to back foreign wars that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians. All of this bloodshed was done under the banner of promoting freedom and democracy. Yet, if you ask the folks in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, the Balkans, Libya and Syria how they view the U.S. “help”, they have what can charitably be called a “different perspective.”

I believe one of the reasons Americans have been bamboozled into supporting most of the U.S. foreign adventures is a fundamental ignorance about U.S. military casualties. Misconceptions about U.S. losses in World War II are pervasive. If you ask the average American who knows something about the history of WW II, he or she likely believes that the United States paid dearly in blood to defeat Japan and to help bring an end to Nazi Germany. In fact, the vast majority of Americans believe that the Russians played only a minor role in crushing the Nazis.

Apart from lousy public education, Hollywood is the major culprit in perpetuating the myth of U.S. prowess in World War II. Those movies that mention the Soviet role (and that is a small number) usually portray Stalin as desperate for the Allies to open a western front against the Germans.

So let me share with you some surprising facts. What were the five bloodiest campaign battles in World War II that cost the United States the most fatalities?

Battle of Normandy–June 6 to August 25, 1944. The United States lost 29,204 killed in action.

Battle of the Bulge–December 16, 1944 to January 28, 1945. KIA, 19,276.

Central Europe Campaign–March 22 to May 8, 1945. Fatalities totaled 15,009.

Battle of Okinawa–April 1 to June 22, 1945. Deaths are estimated between 14,000 and 20,000.

Philippines Campaign–December 8, 1941 to May 6, 1942. Approximately 13,000 KIA.


If your family lost a loved one in these battles, the total number of deaths is meaningless. The death of the person who was loved by parents, siblings and friends was incalculable. My intent in presenting these stark statistics is to help you appreciate why the Russians are so justifiably paranoid about foreign threats, especially those that embrace modern Nazis.

Here are the top five Russian campaigns. They only fought the Germans. But the price in blood is staggering:

Battle of Leningrad–8 September 1941 – 27 January 1944. Total killed numbered 1,017,881.

Battle of Moscow–2 October 1941 – 7 January 1942. Russia lost 653,924 killed and missing.

Operation Barbarossa–22 June 1941 – 5 December 1941. Russia lost 566,852 killed in action

Battle of Stalingrad–23 August 1942 – 2 February 1943. Russia lost 478,741 killed or missing.

Battle of Kursk–5 July 1943 – 23 August 1943. Total fatalities were 432,317 killed or missing.

Let me state the difference in another way. Total U.S. killed in action in World War II in both the European, North African and Pacific Theaters totaled 472,000. The Russians lost more troops in four separate battles than the United States lost in the entire war.

The Russian people did not fight because Stalin had a gun pointed at their back. They rallied in a remarkable way to the Nazi invasion. Most military analysts at the time predicted the Soviet Union would collapse under the weight of the Nazi steamroller. The Russian people defied those expectations and rallied to defeat the best of the German armies.

The horrific death toll touched almost every family in Russia. That is why the Russians still remember and commemorate that sacrifice every May. It has nothing to do with communism. World War II scarred the Russians to the bone. That is the primary reason that Vladimir Putin enjoys widespread public support in taking on the threat from Ukraine. Ukraine has been a de facto NATO ally since 2014, when the United States and the United Kingdom helped orchestrate the coup that ousted the democratically elected president.

The United States and NATO are grossly mistaken if they believe that flexing military muscle by deploying troops on Russia’s borders will cow the Russian people. This perceived threat goes beyond Putin. It is something most Russians see and fear. My hope is that once the American people appreciate the legitimate paranoia of the Russians, they will reject calls to treat Russia as an intractable enemy.

The history of the 77 years that have passed since the end of the war is not replete with incidents of Russia launching repeated military operations in other countries. It is the United States that holds that tarnished crown. President John Quincy Adams, speaking about the Declaration of Independence, offered this wise counsel (Adams was the first U.S. Ambassador to Russia) :


Wherever the standard of freedom and independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She will recommend the general cause, by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example.

I believe the American Republic would be well served to take Adam’s words to heart and construct a new foreign policy that is not based on sending our troops abroad to die in meaningless wars. The good heart that powers America still beats. But it is under assault at home. Russia does not threaten our Republic. Our peril is at home.

====
The Battle of Russia -full length
RT:01:22:56

wiki:
The Battle of Russia (1943) is the fifth film of Frank Capra's Why We Fight documentary series. The longest film of the series, it has two parts. It was made in collaboration with Lithuania-born Anatole Litvak as primary director under Capra's supervision.[1][2] Litvak gave the film its "shape and orientation," and the film had seven writers with voice narration by Walter Huston. The score was done by the Russian-born Hollywood composer Dimitri Tiomkin and drew heavily on Tchaikovsky along with traditional Russian folk songs and ballads.[2]

The film historian Christopher Meir noted that the film's popularity "extended beyond the military audience for it was initially intended, and was the second in the series to be nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature.[2]


Contents
Plot
35:47

The Battle of Russia Part I

45:05

The Battle of Russia Part II

The film begins with an overview of previous failed attempts to conquer Russia: the Teutonic Knights in 1242 (footage from Sergei Eisenstein's film Alexander Nevsky is used), by Charles XII of Sweden in 1704 (footage from Vladimir Petrov's film Peter the Great), by Napoleon I in 1812, and by the German Empire in World War I.

The vast natural resources of the Soviet Union are then described and show why the land is such a hot prize for conquerors. To give a positive impression of the Soviet Union to the American audience, the country's ethnic diversity is covered in, detail and elements of Russian culture that are familiar to Americans, including the musical compositions of Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky and Leo Tolstoy's book War and Peace, are also mentioned. Communism is never mentioned in the film,[2] but the Russian Orthodox Church is described as a force opposing Nazism. The start of the film includes a quote from US General Douglas MacArthur, who commends the Russian people's defense of their nation as one of the most courageous feats in military history.

The film then covers the German conquests of the Balkans, which are described as a preliminary to close off possible Allied counter-invasion routes before the war against Russia was launched on June 22, 1941. The narration describes the German keil und kessel tactics for offensive warfare and the Soviet "defence in depth" tactic to counter that. The scorched earth Soviet tactics, the room-to-room urban warfare in Soviet cities, and the guerilla warfare behind enemy lines are also used to underline the Soviet resolve for victory against the Germans. The Siege of Leningrad and the Battle of Stalingrad conclude the film.

The episode, like other entries in the Why We Fight series, omits many facts that could have cast the Soviet Union in a negative light, such as its occupation of the Baltic states, its war against Finland, its occupation and atrocities in Poland, and its occupation of Romanian territory.[3]

Virtually in line with Soviet propaganda, the series was not only screened but also widely acclaimed in the Soviet Union.[4] The episode has been described as "a blatant pro-Soviet propaganda posing as factual analysis" and was withdrawn from circulation during the Cold War.[2] Capra commented about why certain material was left out:[4][3]

We had a political problem with Russia on that film. The problem was that a hell of a lot of people on our side were not about to be sold a bill of goods by the Communists. We were their allies, but that was all. Communism was not something we desired. So we stayed a way from politics and made it a people's battle. As a result, The Battle of Russia was one of the best episodes of the series and a true one.[1]: 125 
===
.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
If one goes by the last draft, of which I was in, (draft No 35, I joined) there were lots, and I do mean lots, of recruits that were overweight. And the basics I took, got that off of them.

It's strange: We all ate the same food, those who needed to gain weight (like me) did, and those who needed to lose weight did. And some dropped a bunch. More PT Drill SGT!!!!!!

So if they use the type of training I had in Basic and AIT, being out of shape isn't a problem. The thing is "if they use it".

I think the main thing will be the attitude.

Yes there was a bunch of druggies/smokers in Basic and AIT. BUT they did take orders, run, run, run, drop in the mud, etc.... The tatted up purple hair basement dwellers, may not.

And if they don't all one can do is get rid of them, and then what?
Not to drag this too far off-topic again, this probably needs its own thread - but your age mates could do this because they might have been fat, but they probably had good basic nutrition and they played outside, had recesses, went hunting or swimming, rode their bikes; basically, they did all the stuff that a young body needs to do have healthy "bones and teeth" as the old commercials used to say.

Today, that is simply no longer true of all children, both in the US and in the United Kingdom; there is an entire generation or so that grew up with almost no exercise, very little recess, and often no sports (especially if they were a "fat kid"), horrible junk food (that did not build those "bones and teeth,") and the result is humans who are simply too fragile to be "whipped into shape" by ANY program what-so-ever.

I've heard these military trainers on this board and through contacts that even young people with the greatest motivation in the world are being "medically discharged" because their bones break or they suffer other severe health problems during boot camp due to legacy health issues. You can't solve those with a program, the damage is already done.

The only thing you could do would be to have a "light track" for those with desperately skills but who will never be fit enough for regular combat duties. Which the military is already looking at doing because they don't have a lot of good choices.
 

vector7

Dot Collector
Joe Biden at a news conference from NATO summit:

“We provided Ukraine with nearly 7 billion dollars in security assistance since I took office.

The next few days we intend to announce more than 800 million more…”
RT 30secs
View: https://twitter.com/theblaze/status/1542508471504891909?s=20&t=AHUOJZjGSL7GhzQhU5YLOA

...BREAKING REPORT: The State of Texas is SPENDING $4-BILLION this year on BORDER SECURITY
View: https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1542514386152984579?s=20&t=AHUOJZjGSL7GhzQhU5YLOA

Biden: High gas prices to last 'as long as it takes' for Ukraine victory...

b766e60f47dd2702297d19c014695174


81 million people voted for a president who puts Ukrainian, anti-Russian concerns over that of Americans.

10 percent to the big guy.
View: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1542532677034594304?s=20&t=FNG67O3vkihAv1fwjB6Ckg
 
Last edited:

danielboon

TB Fanatic
EndGameWW3

@EndGameWW3

·
13m

Update: Lithuania...

Quote Tweet






Pg1pRVnh_mini.jpg


Samuel Ramani

@SamRamani2
· 1h
Russian MP Viktor Gurulev warns that Vilnius could become Vilna again Vilna is the Russian Empire-era name for Vilnius, so this is a clear threat of a Russian invasion of Lithuania over the Kaliningrad blockade
 

mecoastie

Veteran Member
Russia ad the West both suffer from an aging demographics problem. We dont have the seemingly endless manpower resources that we did in WW2. China watches and smiles.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
EndGameWW3
@EndGameWW3

·
18m

Lithuania should be ready, not afraid of Russian action over Kaliningrad, the country's foreign affairs minister,
@GLandsbergis
, tells Euronews
Lithuania should be ready, not afraid of Russian action over Kaliningrad, the country's foreign affairs minister, really?
This might be the spark that starts WW3! There is only so much poking the bear, before the bear attacks.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
Biden Announces Permanent US Base In Poland, America's First On NATO Eastern Flank
BY TYLER DURDEN
ZERO HEDGE
THURSDAY, JUN 30, 2022 - 01:05 PM

Authored by Dave DeCamp via AntiWar.com,

President Biden announced Wednesday during the NATO summit in Madrid steps that the US will take to increase its military presence in Europe, including the establishment of a permanent base in Poland.

The base in Poland will mark the first time the US will establish an official permanent military facility in the area known as NATO’s "eastern flank." The US military presence elsewhere in Eastern Europe and in the Baltic states is technically on a rotational basis, although Washington has no plans to scale back its presence in the region.



Via AP


Under the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act, NATO agreed not to establish a permanent military presence east of Germany. US officials insist the base in Poland does not violate the act since it is only a permanent facility, and the troops will be deployed rotationally, but it’s unlikely Moscow will see it that way.

Other measures Biden announced include sending a "rotational brigade" of 5,000 troops to Romania, stepping up rotational deployments to the Baltics, sending two additional F-35 squadrons to the UK, and stationing more air defenses in Germany in Italy. A day earlier, Biden announced the US was sending two more Navy Destroyers to Spain.

"I said Putin’s looking for the Finlandization of Europe," Biden said on Wednesday. "He’s going to get the NATOization of Europe. And that is exactly what he didn’t want, but exactly what needs to be done to guarantee security for Europe. And I think it’s necessary."

The deployments are a step towards keeping US troops levels in Europe at over 100,000. Before the US began reinforcing its military presence in Europe around the time Russia invaded Ukraine, about 80,000 US troops were assigned to the continent.

While building up military forces in Eastern Europe and pouring billions of dollars worth of weapons into Ukraine, Biden has abandoned diplomacy with Russia altogether. As a result, the risk of a direct conflict between the two powers, which could quickly spiral into nuclear war, is at its greatest height since the Cold War.

Biden Announces Permanent US Base In Poland, America's First On NATO Eastern Flank | ZeroHedge
 

jward

passin' thru
Lyle Goldstein
@lylegoldstein

1m

While NATO met in Madrid, Putin was with leaders of Caspian littoral states. This map (Vremya,Chan1,29June) illustrates a "North-South" trade corridor that Moscow is now promoting (in red). One can grasp how role of Iran is likely to increase markedly in Russian foreign policy.
1656610148810.png
 

jward

passin' thru
Samuel Ramani
@SamRamani2

2h

Biden is being careful to show that the US did not offer Turkey a quid pro quo of F-16s in exchange for Erdogan backing Sweden and Finland's NATO accession. US policy will also have to balance between Greece and Turkey, as Turkey remains excluded from the F-35 program.
1656610650856.png
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Not to drag this too far off-topic again, this probably needs its own thread - but your age mates could do this because they might have been fat, but they probably had good basic nutrition and they played outside, had recesses, went hunting or swimming, rode their bikes; basically, they did all the stuff that a young body needs to do have healthy "bones and teeth" as the old commercials used to say.

Today, that is simply no longer true of all children, both in the US and in the United Kingdom; there is an entire generation or so that grew up with almost no exercise, very little recess, and often no sports (especially if they were a "fat kid"), horrible junk food (that did not build those "bones and teeth,") and the result is humans who are simply too fragile to be "whipped into shape" by ANY program what-so-ever.

I've heard these military trainers on this board and through contacts that even young people with the greatest motivation in the world are being "medically discharged" because their bones break or they suffer other severe health problems during boot camp due to legacy health issues. You can't solve those with a program, the damage is already done.

The only thing you could do would be to have a "light track" for those with desperately skills but who will never be fit enough for regular combat duties. Which the military is already looking at doing because they don't have a lot of good choices.
That would be a no.

They ate junk food, chips and taco's, had the munchies all the time watched TV, and listened to Hard Rock (Grateful Dead, Black Sabbath, etc) and smoked, with their head between a couple of 3 foot high speakers, and were dope heads.

Remember my Draft time was during 'Nam.

Had a couple of Texans that had a couple of WWI gas masks with the filter on the belt with a hose. The filter was filled with dope every Friday, and the only time they got up out of the floor all week end long was to go to the PX for chips, or latrine.
 

jward

passin' thru
I understand your point, Cary, but those compatriots of yours were raised- and their bodies formed- largely before the ills of the American diet had taken hold; Plenty of threads cover the growing impact the intrinsic physical limitations present our warriors (HFCS wasn't around this country until mid seventies, for example)
 

jward

passin' thru
Samuel Ramani
@SamRamani2


BREAKING: Spain announces plans to increase its defence spending to 2% of GDP by 2029
Spain's defence spending as portion of GDP has hovered around 1.4% in recent years, so this is a notable uptick. Spain is stepping up its contributions to Black Sea security and has urged NATO to more assertively mitigate threats to its southern flank
1656611451553.png



BREAKING: Britain confirms that it will increase its defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2030
The full statement from Boris Johnson, which should dampen speculation about disagreements between the Ministry of Defence and Downing Street on the required level of British defence spending.
1656611635626.png
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Samuel Ramani
@SamRamani2


BREAKING: Spain announces plans to increase its defence spending to 2% of GDP by 2029
Spain's defence spending as portion of GDP has hovered around 1.4% in recent years, so this is a notable uptick. Spain is stepping up its contributions to Black Sea security and has urged NATO to more assertively mitigate threats to its southern flank
View attachment 347613



BREAKING: Britain confirms that it will increase its defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2030
The full statement from Boris Johnson, which should dampen speculation about disagreements between the Ministry of Defence and Downing Street on the required level of British defence spending.
View attachment 347614

The time frames involved with these pledges vs the claimed threat are pitiful.
 

raven

TB Fanatic
The time frames involved with these pledges vs the claimed threat are pitiful.
Simply supports the assertion that Russia is winning and
about all we can do it send military equipment
until some vague point in the future.

As if the populations of the US and Europe will be willing to absorb inflation and recession
and have a long protracted conflict like Afghanistan.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
Lithuania crossed the Rubicon: A total blockade begins in Kaliningrad & asks For Smolensk back from Russia!
In Putin's hands: the answer
30/06/2022 - 21:08
War News 24 / 7
Columnist: Vassilis Kapoulas

Lithuania decided to cross the Rubicon by implementing a total blockade of Kaliningrad from July 10. The situation in the Baltic is now heading from bad to worse...

And because that was not enough, a Lithuanian MEMBER twice warned Moscow not to lift the Treaty recognising Lithuania's independence in 1991!


Otherwise, Lithuania, for its part, will revoke the Polyanovka Treaty and demand the return of the Russian region of Smolensk!

Now Moscow has a single solution if something does not change dramatically within the ten-day period...

"Sanctions in Kaliningrad will be fully implemented"

Lithuania will proceed with the transit sanctions in Kaliningrad as planned.

Lithuanian Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė said the country would continue to apply the terms of the fourth package of EU sanctions against Russia and stop the transit of other goods to the Kaliningrad region from July 10, when the restrictions are due to take effect.

"Yes, in the way we are currently complying with the sanctions that came into force on June 17," Šimonytė said, responding to the question of whether other sanctions would be applied.

According to the Prime Minister of Lithuania, customers of Lithuanian Railways have already been informed.

"The carriers were informed that from July 10, the guidelines on sanctions will come into force so that they do not load cargo after that date," he said.

It is noted that since June 17, EU sanctions for the transport of steel and ferrous metals through lithuanian territory to the Russian region of Kaliningrad have entered into force.

From July 10, restrictions will be imposed on the transit of cement, alcohol and luxury goods while the ban on coal and other solid fossil fuels will take effect on August 10.

The Russian Foreign Ministry recently summoned the Chargé d'Affaires of Lithuania, Virginia Umbrasene, to protest the decision of the Lithuanian authorities to ban the transit of a wide variety of goods to the Kaliningrad region.

"Later, the Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs handed over to the Russian temporary chargé d'affaires in Vilnius Sergei Ryabocon a note explaining the restrictive measures imposed by the EU on certain categories of goods in transit in Kaliningrad. During the meeting, the information spread by the Russian side that Lithuania has banned the passage of passengers and goods not subject to EU sanctions was refuted."

"We can expect various reactions from Russia, not even reactions, but actions, for no reason and without pretext," Simonite told reporters on Thursday.

When asked how the new sanctions will be imposed, the prime minister said, "in the same way that those that came into force on June 17 are now being imposed."

Smolensk issue if Russia annuls the Treaty...

"After the blockade of Kaliningrad, Lithuania, asks for the return of the "original territories of Smolensk," Russian media reported. And they add:

"On June 18, Lithuania imposed a de facto blockade of the Kaliningrad region, establishing a ban on the transit of cargo from the area of the Russian enclave.

However, this was not enough for some Lithuanians as their appetites grow. Not only do they sabotage the EU's own efforts to normalise the situation, but they are even putting forward territorial claims against Russia, actively escalating the situation.

For example, the member of the Seimas (Parliament) of Lithuania, Matas Maldeikis, asked Moscow to return to Vilnius "the territories of the ancestors of Smolensk."

In fact, he asked for it twice in June!


"If Russia revokes the recognition of Lithuania's independence in 1991, Lithuania will revoke the Polyanovka Treaty of 1634 and demand that Russia return all the occupied territories to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Smolensk is Lithuania!"

"I demand that access to the original Lithuanian territories of Smolensk be returned to us through this land corridor,"
he said, attaching a map to which he marked a significant part of Belarus and the western regions of the Russian Federation.

The publisher of the Russian version of Regnum, Yury Baranchik in response to Vilnius' actions in relation to Kaliningrad said:

"Part of Lithuania will be annexed to Belarus, the rest to the Kaliningrad region"

Vladimir Soloviev also referred to the issue on the show of Russian state television. He said:

"There is a problem. They are calling for Smolensk's return to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. When a Lithuanian MP speaks, no one pays attention to him.

He tells us that Smolensk is a Lithuanian land, let them come and take them."


They create a border militia

At the same time, Lithuania is proceeding with the creation of a border militia.

Currently, there are about 12,000 members, and this number is growing every month. Since the first days of the war in Ukraine, the number of recruits seeking to join each month has increased from 10 to more than 100.

This means that in the first line of defense are the men and women if the Russian troops stationed less than 100 feet away, advance towards the Suwalki Corridor .

The Suwalki corridor passes through the small town of Kybartai. This area of land, about 60 miles wide, is located between russia's heavily fortified, nuclear-armed city in Kaliningrad and its ally, Belarus.

"Lithuania must be ready for everything"

Lithuania must "be ready" and "not afraid" of Russian action in Kaliningrad, the country's Foreign Minister stressed, speaking of a possible Russian escalation in the Kaliningrad enclave.

Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said he does not expect a confrontation over the Russian enclave in an interview on the sidelines of the NATO summit.

"Russia is unhappy with the sanctions ... it is understandable that the country that was so dependent on the West at the moment is now being cut off from supplies coming from the West and has complaints about it," Landbergis said.

However, he said, "only about 0.7% of traffic passing through Lithuanian territory is interrupted," which is not a "big reason" for a stalemate.

"But then again, there are other ways in which they can transport materials or anything else they need, to Kaliningrad," he said.

Truce_of_Deulino_1618-1619.PNG



Lithuania crossed the Rubicon: A total blockade begins in Kaliningrad & asks For Smolensk back from Russia! - WarNews247
 
Last edited:

raven

TB Fanatic
Lithuania crossed the Rubicon: A total blockade begins in Kaliningrad & asks For Smolensk back from Russia!
In Putin's hands the answer
30/06/2022 - 21:08
War News 24 / 7

Columnist: Vassilis Kapoulas

Lithuania decided to cross the Rubicon by implementing a total blockade of Kaliningrad from July 10. The situation in the Baltic is now heading from bad to worse...

And because that was not enough, a Lithuanian MEMBER twice warned Moscow not to lift the Treaty recognising Lithuania's independence in 1991!


Otherwise, Lithuania, for its part, will revoke the Polyanovka Treaty and demand the return of the Russian region of Smolensk!

Now Moscow has a single solution if something does not change dramatically within the ten-day period...

"Sanctions in Kaliningrad will be fully implemented"

Lithuania will proceed with the transit sanctions in Kaliningrad as planned.

Lithuanian Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė said the country would continue to apply the terms of the fourth package of EU sanctions against Russia and stop the transit of other goods to the Kaliningrad region from July 10, when the restrictions are due to take effect.

"Yes, in the way we are currently complying with the sanctions that came into force on June 17," Šimonytė said, responding to the question of whether other sanctions would be applied.

According to the Prime Minister of Lithuania, customers of Lithuanian Railways have already been informed.

"The carriers were informed that from July 10, the guidelines on sanctions will come into force so that they do not load cargo after that date," he said.

It is noted that since June 17, EU sanctions for the transport of steel and ferrous metals through lithuanian territory to the Russian region of Kaliningrad have entered into force.

From July 10, restrictions will be imposed on the transit of cement, alcohol and luxury goods while the ban on coal and other solid fossil fuels will take effect on August 10.

The Russian Foreign Ministry recently summoned the Chargé d'Affaires of Lithuania, Virginia Umbrasene, to protest the decision of the Lithuanian authorities to ban the transit of a wide variety of goods to the Kaliningrad region.

"Later, the Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs handed over to the Russian temporary chargé d'affaires in Vilnius Sergei Ryabocon a note explaining the restrictive measures imposed by the EU on certain categories of goods in transit in Kaliningrad. During the meeting, the information spread by the Russian side that Lithuania has banned the passage of passengers and goods not subject to EU sanctions was refuted."

"We can expect various reactions from Russia, not even reactions, but actions, for no reason and without pretext," Simonite told reporters on Thursday.

When asked how the new sanctions will be imposed, the prime minister said, "in the same way that those that came into force on June 17 are now being imposed."

Smolensk issue if Russia annuls the Treaty...

"After the blockade of Kaliningrad, Lithuania, asks for the return of the "original territories of Smolensk," Russian media reported. And they add:

"On June 18, Lithuania imposed a de facto blockade of the Kaliningrad region, establishing a ban on the transit of cargo from the area of the Russian enclave.

However, this was not enough for some Lithuanians as their appetites grow. Not only do they sabotage the EU's own efforts to normalise the situation, but they are even putting forward territorial claims against Russia, actively escalating the situation.

For example, the member of the Seimas (Parliament) of Lithuania, Matas Maldeikis, asked Moscow to return to Vilnius "the territories of the ancestors of Smolensk."

In fact, he asked for it twice in June!


"If Russia revokes the recognition of Lithuania's independence in 1991, Lithuania will revoke the Polyanovka Treaty of 1634 and demand that Russia return all the occupied territories to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Smolensk is Lithuania!"

"I demand that access to the original Lithuanian territories of Smolensk be returned to us through this land corridor,"
he said, attaching a map to which he marked a significant part of Belarus and the western regions of the Russian Federation.

The publisher of the Russian version of Regnum, Yury Baranchik in response to Vilnius' actions in relation to Kaliningrad said:

"Part of Lithuania will be annexed to Belarus, the rest to the Kaliningrad region"

Vladimir Soloviev also referred to the issue on the show of Russian state television. He said:

"There is a problem. They are calling for Smolensk's return to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. When a Lithuanian MP speaks, no one pays attention to him.

He tells us that Smolensk is a Lithuanian land, let them come and take them."


They create a border militia

At the same time, Lithuania is proceeding with the creation of a border militia.

Currently, there are about 12,000 members, and this number is growing every month. Since the first days of the war in Ukraine, the number of recruits seeking to join each month has increased from 10 to more than 100.

This means that in the first line of defense are the men and women if the Russian troops stationed less than 100 feet away, advance towards the Suwalki Corridor .

The Suwalki corridor passes through the small town of Kybartai. This area of land, about 60 miles wide, is located between russia's heavily fortified, nuclear-armed city in Kaliningrad and its ally, Belarus.

"Lithuania must be ready for everything"
Lithuania must "be ready" and "not afraid" of Russian action in Kaliningrad, the country's Foreign Minister stressed, speaking of a possible Russian escalation in the Kaliningrad enclave.

Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said he does not expect a confrontation over the Russian enclave in an interview on the sidelines of the NATO summit.

"Russia is unhappy with the sanctions ... it is understandable that the country that was so dependent on the West at the moment is now being cut off from supplies coming from the West and has complaints about it," Landbergis said.

However, he said, "only about 0.7% of traffic passing through Lithuanian territory is interrupted," which is not a "big reason" for a stalemate.

"But then again, there are other ways in which they can transport materials or anything else they need, to Kaliningrad," he said.

Truce_of_Deulino_1618-1619.PNG



Lithuania crossed the Rubicon: A total blockade begins in Kaliningrad & asks For Smolensk back from Russia! - WarNews247
These are the "Prussians"
 
Top