POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

marsh

TB Fanatic

Compromised? Controlled? Oath Keepers Infiltrated by Government and Military ‘Members’

by Mac Slavo
September 28, 2021

Compromised_ Controlled_ Oath Keepers Infiltrated by Government and Military 'Members'

Editor’s Commentary: I know a few Oath Keepers. They’re very decent and patriotic people. I don’t know a ton about the group itself but what little I’ve heard has been positive. That’s why the story below by Mac Slavo caught me off guard when it came across my desk. Could the organizational leadership be pretending to be adamant defenders of the United States Constitution when in actuality they are a placating force to keep tabs on — and control over — American patriots?

I’m publishing Mac’s commentary even though I have no confirmation. It’s worth exploring further. RT is listed as a source, and while I’m not as dogmatic as others in conservative media who instantly proclaim anything from Russian media must be propaganda or fake news, I have known some of their stories to be disinformation. I would not say that I’m necessarily skeptical of this report, but I won’t pass judgment on the Oath Keepers based solely on it.

One thing is fairly certain. The U.S. government has infiltrated the Oath Keepers and likely every major “right-wing” group in America. But there’s a flip-side to this. The U.S. government has also used the boogeyman of infiltrators within these organizations to foment distrust and an inability to properly organize. It’s a two-edged sword; trust the wrong people and your group crashes, mistrust the good guys and there’s a failure to launch. Here’s Mac’s take…

It’s All a Set Up! US Military and Government Emails Found on Leaked Oath Keepers Membership Lists

This whole thing has been a setup. A membership email was released showing that United States military personnel and government officials were found on a leaked membership list of the Oath Keepers.

If you have ever wondered why those “extremist” right-wingers never actually do anything to advance liberty or freedom, we now know why. It’s all a part of the illusion. Around 160 official US government and military email addresses reportedly feature on a membership list belonging to the ‘Oath Keepers’ militia that was leaked online after the far-right group was apparently hacked.

Since we all know government is slavery, these officials are likely the controllers of the Oath Keepers and they have infiltrated and castrated any response the group may make. Again, we aren’t free. We aren’t losing freedom. We never have had true freedom.

What we are losing now is the illusion of freedom. People are beginning to see that the government is their masters and claiming control over all of us, making us their slaves. Once enough figure this out, we can actually do something about our enslavement.

About 5GB of data, including emails, chat logs, member records, donor lists, and other documents, was allegedly siphoned from the group’s servers. This was provided to the transparency collective Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoSecrets), which shared the information on Monday.

According to the collective, the files identify tens of thousands of current and former members as well as several donors. The Oath Keepers is said to include current and former military, law enforcement, and first-responder personnel who have sworn oaths to defend the US Constitution “from all enemies, foreign and domestic.” -RT


However, it is important to note that featuring on the list does not necessarily mean the owners of the email addresses are current or previous members of the militia group. In a statement to the Daily Dot, US Army spokesperson Matt Leonard said there was “no place for extremism” in the military and noted that the Army would investigate whether personnel were involved in prohibited activities like “advocating supremacist, extremist, or criminal gang doctrine, ideology, or causes.”

Use your discernment and critical thinking skills and come to your own conclusion on this one.

We have watched the Oath Keepers be incredibly ineffective at promoting liberty and freedom over the years, and perhaps this is why. Remember, we said the January 6th “insurrection” was a setup and so was the last protest.

This is all a part of the psychological operation of the left vs. right paradigm lie. Stop falling for it. A left master or a right master is still a master. Let’s evolve beyond needing a master and being slaves.

Image by Anthony Crider, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
 

Calhounshd

Senior Member

Compromised? Controlled? Oath Keepers Infiltrated by Government and Military ‘Members’

by Mac Slavo
September 28, 2021

Compromised_ Controlled_ Oath Keepers Infiltrated by Government and Military 'Members''Members'

Editor’s Commentary: I know a few Oath Keepers. They’re very decent and patriotic people. I don’t know a ton about the group itself but what little I’ve heard has been positive. That’s why the story below by Mac Slavo caught me off guard when it came across my desk. Could the organizational leadership be pretending to be adamant defenders of the United States Constitution when in actuality they are a placating force to keep tabs on — and control over — American patriots?

I’m publishing Mac’s commentary even though I have no confirmation. It’s worth exploring further. RT is listed as a source, and while I’m not as dogmatic as others in conservative media who instantly proclaim anything from Russian media must be propaganda or fake news, I have known some of their stories to be disinformation. I would not say that I’m necessarily skeptical of this report, but I won’t pass judgment on the Oath Keepers based solely on it.

One thing is fairly certain. The U.S. government has infiltrated the Oath Keepers and likely every major “right-wing” group in America. But there’s a flip-side to this. The U.S. government has also used the boogeyman of infiltrators within these organizations to foment distrust and an inability to properly organize. It’s a two-edged sword; trust the wrong people and your group crashes, mistrust the good guys and there’s a failure to launch. Here’s Mac’s take…

It’s All a Set Up! US Military and Government Emails Found on Leaked Oath Keepers Membership Lists

This whole thing has been a setup. A membership email was released showing that United States military personnel and government officials were found on a leaked membership list of the Oath Keepers.

If you have ever wondered why those “extremist” right-wingers never actually do anything to advance liberty or freedom, we now know why. It’s all a part of the illusion. Around 160 official US government and military email addresses reportedly feature on a membership list belonging to the ‘Oath Keepers’ militia that was leaked online after the far-right group was apparently hacked.

Since we all know government is slavery, these officials are likely the controllers of the Oath Keepers and they have infiltrated and castrated any response the group may make. Again, we aren’t free. We aren’t losing freedom. We never have had true freedom.

What we are losing now is the illusion of freedom. People are beginning to see that the government is their masters and claiming control over all of us, making us their slaves. Once enough figure this out, we can actually do something about our enslavement.

About 5GB of data, including emails, chat logs, member records, donor lists, and other documents, was allegedly siphoned from the group’s servers. This was provided to the transparency collective Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoSecrets), which shared the information on Monday.

According to the collective, the files identify tens of thousands of current and former members as well as several donors. The Oath Keepers is said to include current and former military, law enforcement, and first-responder personnel who have sworn oaths to defend the US Constitution “from all enemies, foreign and domestic.” -RT


However, it is important to note that featuring on the list does not necessarily mean the owners of the email addresses are current or previous members of the militia group. In a statement to the Daily Dot, US Army spokesperson Matt Leonard said there was “no place for extremism” in the military and noted that the Army would investigate whether personnel were involved in prohibited activities like “advocating supremacist, extremist, or criminal gang doctrine, ideology, or causes.”

Use your discernment and critical thinking skills and come to your own conclusion on this one.

We have watched the Oath Keepers be incredibly ineffective at promoting liberty and freedom over the years, and perhaps this is why. Remember, we said the January 6th “insurrection” was a setup and so was the last protest.

This is all a part of the psychological operation of the left vs. right paradigm lie. Stop falling for it. A left master or a right master is still a master. Let’s evolve beyond needing a master and being slaves.

Image by Anthony Crider, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Could be a setup or partial infiltration of an originally conservative organization.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

President Trump Posts Letter from Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright – Puts Maricopa County on NOTICE: Preservation Of Evidence/Litigation Hold

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 29, 2021 at 7:45am

President Trump issued a Save America statement yesterday to remind America of the notice of claim issued to Maricopa County requesting preservation of evidence.

The mainstream media outlets that actually covered this huge event did a shoddy job at best of reporting this new investigation from the Arizona Attorney General’s office.

Yesterday, The Gateway Pundit reported that Attorney General Mark Brnovich sent letters to both Maricopa County and The Arizona Senate.

President Trump on Tuesday night posted the letter from Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright to Maricopa County officials.

Wright told Maricopa County officials to preserve their evidence!

– September 28, 2021 –
ICYMI: Letter from Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright
Read the full letter here.

Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright issued the following notice to the county on Monday following the damning Arizona audit report.




Maricopa County must now follow these commands and answer to the Attorney General.

** You Can Contact Attorney General Mark Brnovich Here — Urge AG Brnovich to do something about these election results!

 

marsh

TB Fanatic

AUDIT MICHIGAN: Jacky Eubanks Canvassing Efforts Raise Serious Questions – “We’re Looking At An 18% To 20% Irregularity And Anomaly Rate” (VIDEO)

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 29, 2021 at 8:30am


A candidate for Michigan State Representative is leading canvassing efforts and fighting for a full forensic audit of the 2020 election in Michigan.


1632952206073.png

Jacky Eubanks is running for Michigan’s 32nd House seat and she is dedicated to fixing elections in Michigan before it is too late.

This is despite the fact that Michigan state police are being weaponized by Attorney General Dana Nessel to target people who are looking for the truth.

Canvassing of the Arizona election in Maricopa County, led by Liz Harris revealed hundreds of thousands of lost votes and ghost voters.

Jacky Eubank’s canvassing efforts in Macomb County are finding similar results and Republican officials are fighting against a full forensic audit in Michigan.

The Gateway Pundit correspondent Jordan Conradson spoke to Eubanks last week for an update.
Conradson: I know you’ve been leading grassroots election integrity efforts throughout the state. Can you tell me about your canvassing efforts?
Eubanks: Yes. So, it all started with, after the election we thought, not only did funny business and fraud happen in Wayne County. Which obviously everybody knows that the city of Detroit is notoriously corrupt and ballot box stuffing happened and there’s apparently 9000 affidavits that were signed as witnesses to the fraud that took place on election day and the day after in Wayne County. But nobody really took a look at Macomb because Macomb went for Trump, in 2020. But what I thought was interesting was that Macomb has been the bellwether County for the state of Michigan and has been one, I believe one of nine counties, who have determined who would win the presidency in every presidential election, like ever. So when Trump won Macomb but didn’t win the presidency, I thought that was weird and strange because that was the first time that’s ever happened, and also that his margin of victory went down. So we decided to take a random sample of absentee voters from my hometown of Chesterfield Michigan, and just go knock on their doors and verify that the name and address on the ballot matches up with what happened in real life. And what we found was really startling. We found between 18% and 20%, it fluctuates because we’re still gathering data, but we’re looking at an 18% to 20% irregularity and anomaly rate based on the canvassing we’ve been doing this summer.
Conradson: Right, so are you finding issues like ghosts votes and lost votes like we found out here in Arizona?
Eubanks: So we’ve definitely been finding what we call phantom voters or ghost votes. We have not looked at Lost voters. I didn’t even think to do that until the Liz Harris report was released and now there’s a lot of interest in doing that. We may adjust, but mostly our, our MO was just going to houses, and people that we know there’s an absentee ballot that was counted in their name. And then we just go to that addresses and try to see if we can talk to the voter, whose name is on that ballot. And what we’ve been finding is that there’s a series of different kinds of anomalies.
Number one is, if we go to that address, and we find out that there is nobody by that name who lives at that address, and the current homeowner will even say I don’t know who you’re talking about I’ve lived here for two years, 10 years, 20 years, and they don’t know who the person that we’re asking for is. And then another irregularity we have, is when we try to go to an address to verify that name and the address is not valid. For example, we had one ballot assigned to a dentist/a real estate office, we had another ballot that, well many ballots have been assigned to a gigantic apartment complex with many buildings and many numbers within each building and the addresses do not specify a building number or apartment number, so there’s no way to track down to see if this person is real. Other irregularities include, we, we talked to the voter and we say did you, we ask did you vote, and they said no I did not vote in the November 2020 election, and then we say well records show you voted absentee, and then they get upset because they realize they’ve been defrauded and they sign an affidavit.

The third and most mysterious kind that we found is people who swear they voted in person at the polling precinct on election day, And even recall putting their ballot into the tabulator and recall shredding their absentee ballot if it was mailed to them. Yet, There’s still an absentee ballot that’s been counted in their name, according to official records.
Now keep in mind all the records we’ve gotten we’re FOIA’d through the township, through the county, and through the state, but all this is online. We would literally need to do a full forensic audit, in order to verify these anomalies, because we’re just checking them against online records, and we don’t know if there’s actually paper ballots and signatures to match the online records.
Conradson: Yes. Have you brought this to any elected officials?
Eubanks: I have been in constant talks with the county clerk. And his response was at first, “Just bring me more affidavits and I will consider doing an audit for Macomb County, you know, I just need hard proof.” Then when I brought him affidavits he said “Great, I’m turning it over to the state police.” Well, the state police are headed by Dana Nestle, our attorney general who has openly stated that she will come after anybody who questions the results of the 2020 election. So then it got turned over to the FBI and as far as I know, the affidavits I turned it to him are being investigated by the FBI, which I don’t, I’m not necessarily a fan of that outcome.

Conradson:
Right. Um, so another thing I was wondering, are you facing any pushback for your canvassing efforts from Dana Nessel or the Democrats in Michigan?
Eubanks: Shockingly, not the Democrats it’s the Republicans who are trying to shut this down. So I had no idea that so many people did not want this canvassing effort to go through, or they don’t want an audit at all. And I’m very quickly realizing, the more attention I’m getting for this canvassing effort, the more volunteers who get involved, the more events I go to where I present my findings, the more Republican politicians currently in office try to stop it.
Conradson: Why do you think that is do you think they’re scared, and they might have lost?
Eubanks: So, this is where things become speculative, and I like to stick with the facts, but if I were to guess. Well, their narrative is that we just want unity and we just want to focus on 2022 and, and turning Michigan red, and just winning back.
Congress, and I can’t help but think that if the Democrats got away with rigging the election in 2020, how can we ever be sure that they won’t rig 2022, 2024 and every election here after. So either the current politicians don’t believe there was any fraud, which I’ve presented enough evidence to show that there was, and plenty of other people have shown that there was through their findings. So either they, they don’t want to see it, they don’t want to look at it, they don’t want to believe it or they know something. And if the audit went through something about them could come out that implicates them in a crime. Those are the only two things, I can figure, but I don’t know. Yeah, that’s what we’re dealing with.

Conradson: Yes 100% getting to the bottom of 2020 is the top priority before 2022 Who do we need to pressure in Michigan to get a full forensic audit going
Eubanks: At this point, I would, I think our best hope is the state legislature because we do have a Republican majority in both the Michigan House and Michigan Senate. I spoke to a Michigan Senator last night. He said he has been in constant talks with the Arizona State Senate, and that they have told him to hold off until the Arizona report comes out, which I believe is this Friday. So, basically, he said, there is a group of Republicans in the state legislature working towards getting an audit but they’re waiting for the final results to come out from Arizona before they proceed, I would still say people should call their Michigan representatives and tell them that they need to do this.
Republicans in these fraud-ridden states like Georgia, Michigan, and Arizona have dropped the ball and refused to stand for their constituents.

Republican Maricopa County Supervisor Steve Chucri admitted that issues like ballot harvesting, dead voters, and faulty machines affected these states, as well as Arizona.

1632952278027.png

Chucri and Republicans across the country continue to fight against audits, leaving their constituents wondering who they really work for.

Now that the Arizona audit report has been publicized to show massive amounts of fraud, it is time for the Michigan Legislators to act on their promises.

Call your legislator if you live in Michigan and would like to see your vote counted.

Support Jacky and the Michigan canvassing efforts, HERE!


Rumble video on website 9:40 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

BREAKING: Maricopa County Releases Statement – Plans Formal Response To Arizona Senate – Is FINALLY Promising Answers

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 29, 2021 at 9:00am

After months of litigation, fighting, media breakdowns, lies, scandalous audio leaks, and a waste of tax dollars, Maricopa County will finally issue a “technical response” to the Arizona audit report.

This response will reportedly “answer the questions raised” and address the anomalies that The County claims were not fully investigated.

The Arizona Senate has been asking for answers to these questions and cooperation to ensure a full investigation since day one of the audit.

The Attorney General is now knocking at the County’s door and the county is now trying to BS their way out of this one.

Their announcement came hours after Attorney General Mark Brnovich publicized a litigation hold notice placed on Maricopa County while an investigation is pursued.


1632953082698.png
1632953252605.png

Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer claims that “for months we were told the audit’s mission was to provide an accurate count.” He then claims that the accurate hand-count totals “went almost ignored in last week’s presentation.”

Since day one, however, we were told this is a “fact-finding mission”, and it was well known that they were on the lookout for fake or illegal ballots, ballot harvesting, dead voters, and other examples of election fraud. This was a mission to ensure that “one vote = one point” and ballots were not being dumped, over-duplicated, cast from a phantom voter, or lost.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EVEN CAME IN TO INTIMIDATE THE STATE LEGISLATURE AND PREVENT A CANVASS OF THE VOTER ROLLS!


The hand-count totals were not ignored at all either! This point is not only the first item on the Results Tally Reportby CyberNinjas, it was the first finding addressed in the presentation by Senate President Karen Fann.

Apparently, everybody except for Maricopa County knows, illegal ballots do not count!
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, the genius behind the Arizona audit kinematic artifact detection, shared a great analogy for this on Twitter.

1632952943142.png

Here is the county’s statement:
Maricopa County Plans Formal Response to Senate’s Election Review
September 28, 2021 (Phoenix) — With the Senate’s review of Maricopa County’s elections complete, the County today announced it will provide a comprehensive technical report in the coming weeks.
“It took the Cyber Ninjas more than five months to complete this report and it will take us time to responsibly gather all the facts and answer the questions raised, but we’re committed to providing a comprehensive and accurate response,” said Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer. “For months, we were told the audit’s mission was to provide an accurate count. What went almost ignored in last week’s presentation was that the Cyber Ninjas agreed with Maricopa County’s results: Joe Biden won Maricopa County in the 2020 election. The work of hardworking professionals in Maricopa County was confirmed, and we thank the Senate for confirming what we’ve said since November of last year.”
On Friday, the County provided real time responses to many of the allegations made by the Senate’s contractors. This technical report will provide a deeper dive into the County’s early ballot and tabulation processes. It will also include election staff’s research into the actual voter IDs included in the Senate’s review. The County’s technical response will address many of the “anomalies” that stumped the Senate’s contractors but appear not to have been fully investigated by their team.

“We will do what we’ve always done, provide factual responses using real data from our election experts who know what they’re looking at,” said Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Chairman Jack Sellers. “The opinions that came out of Friday’s hearing were conjecture without proof and were twisted to fit the narrative that something went wrong. The fact is, the Elections Department ran accurate, secure and transparent elections in 2020.”
The Maricopa County Elections Department is also preparing to carry out its statutory duty to conduct the November Jurisdictional Elections, which have already begun.
Ballots are being prepared and the Elections Department will send them to nearly 1.4 million eligible voters across 25 participating cities, towns and school districts on October 6. While the county will work to provide answers to the questions raised in the report, conducting these elections is critical and will take priority.
Voters can find election facts and myths the county has already debunked at JustTheFacts.Vote.

Board Chairman Jack Sellers

Jack Sellers: We will do what we’ve always done, provide factual responses using real data from our election experts who know what they’re looking at. The opinions that came out of Friday’s hearing were conjecture without proof and were twisted to fit the narrative that something went wrong. The fact is, the Elections Department ran accurate, secure, and transparent elections in 2020.
This is a funny response considering that their last “factual response” was actually “bullsh*t” according to one of their own.

1632952870712.png

The Arizona Audit revealed potential violations of Arizona statutes and Elections Procedures, with photo and video proof. They also demonstrated an extremely mismanaged, disorganized elections system that is impossible to accurately track.

The elections were not secure and Maricopa county fought against transparency every step of the way, as revealed by County Supervisor Steve Chucri here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Maricopa County Supervisor Bill Gates labels these primary sources “elections misinformation”.


1632952812671.png

Supervisor Steve Chucri resigned and the County has swept this whole situation under the rug so that they can continue to lie to their voters.

The County’s response will likely attack and discredit the audit, as well as those involved.
After their continued lies, why should we trust any answer they give?


This Investigation is in Attorney Mark Brnovich’s hands now.

Contact Attorney General Mark Brnovich and demand an investigation and indictments!

 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Arizona GOP Candidate Kari Lake: “I Think Katie Hobbs Is Going to Have a Really Hard Time Campaigning from Behind Bars!” (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published September 29, 2021 at 10:18am


Republican candidate for Governor in Arizona joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Wednesday.

President Trump endorsed Kari Lake for governor this week!

Kari Lake told Steve Bannon that she is not worried about Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs in her gubernatorial race.
Steve Bannon: Do you think it’s going to be an easy race against Katie Hobbs?

Kari Lake: Well, I think Katie Hobbs is going to have a really hard time campaigning from behind bars, to be honest.
Oh my!

Kari Lake is a DREAM!


Watch the entire interview below.

Via The War Room:

Rumble video on website 7:52 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

The Government’s Case Against Many Jan. 6 Defendants is in Legal Jeopardy

The obstruction charge on which the government is relying so heavily may, in fact, be unconstitutional as applied to most of the Jan. 6 defendants.

Posted by Ameer BennoWednesday, September 29, 2021 at 11:00am33 Comments

https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1346894172574404613


The government’s case against many, if not most, of the January 6 defendants is in legal peril.

Over 650 people have been criminally charged in connection with the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6. The main charge against hundreds of these defendants is felony “obstruction” under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).

That statute provides:
“Whoever corruptly … obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”
Most of the other charges against the Jan. 6 defendants involve misdemeanors sounding in trespass, vandalism and disorderly conduct for which the maximum sentence is one year imprisonment, thus making the obstruction charge the most serious by far.

Yet the Biden Department of Justice, in its facts-and-law-be-damned fervor to nail those on the political right to the wall, once again seemed to have overplayed its hand.

The obstruction charge on which the government is relying so heavily may, in fact, be unconstitutional as applied to the Jan. 6 defendants.

Donovan Crowl
To understand why this is so, one need only look to the case of Donovan Crowl. Crowl, who according to papers filed by his attorney is a 50 year-old Marine veteran from Ohio with no prior criminal convictions, attended the Jan. 6 Stop the Steal Rally at The Ellipse in Washington D.C..

Thereafter, Crowl and others made their way to the Capitol. According to the indictment against him, this group aligned in a “stack” formation and marched single file, each “keeping at least one hand on the shoulder of the other in front of them,” up the east side stairs of the Capitol. At approximately 2:40 p.m., says Crowl’s lawyer, Crowl and the others in his “stack” passed through the Capitol doors that were already open and entered the Rotunda.

At 3:05 p.m. – just 20 minutes later – Crowl exited the building. The others in Crowl’s “stack” had either left the Capitol contemporaneously with him or earlier.

Crowl did not destroy property, injure anyone or threaten to do so. He is not accused of possessing any weapons or of stealing documents or other items belonging to members of Congress.

The Charges
Crowl and 16 others eventually were arrested and charged on a singular indictment.
Counts One and Two of the indictment charged all of the defendants with “corruptly obstruct[ing]” the certification of the Electoral Vote in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), and conspiring with others to do so (Crowl also was charged with two misdemeanors – trespass and aiding and abetting the destruction of government property.)

Notably, the Joint Session of Congress on Jan. 6 had been suspended at 2:29 p.m. that day – 11 minutes before Crowl and the others entered the Capitol – and it did not resume until 9:02 p.m. that evening.

Nevertheless, the indictment alleges that the defendants’ entrance into the Capitol and presence there for no more than 20 minutes after Congress had recessed obstructed the Congressional proceeding in violation of §1512(c)(2).

Crowl’s lawyer recently filed a motion to dismiss the obstruction charge. In it, she argued that it was factually impossible for Crowl to have obstructed a Congressional proceeding that was already over at the time Crowl engaged in the conduct charged in the indictment.

But she also raised an important legal argument: that the obstruction statute relied on by the government is unconstitutional as applied to most of the Jan. 6 defendants because it did not put them on notice that a brief trespass into the Capitol while participating in a political rally could subject them to a 20-year prison sentence.

The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine
The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment provides that “[n]o person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The Supreme Court has made clear that this guarantee is violated when the government “tak[es] away someone’s life, liberty, or property under a criminal law so vague that it fails to give ordinary people fair notice of the conduct it punishes, or so standardless that it invites arbitrary enforcement.”

Without such guidelines, explained the high court, a criminal statute would permit “a standardless sweep” that would “allow policemen, prosecutors, and juries to pursue their personal predilections.”

How dangerous that would be in the hands of a vengeful DOJ.

But that’s exactly where we find ourselves. The Biden Administration has used an ambiguously worded criminal statute to crush President Trump’s supporters – and along with them their families and their livelihoods.

U.S. v. Poindexter
Just as Shakespeare said “what’s past is prologue,” insight into the legal issue here can be found by looking back four decades to a case that arose out of the Iran/Contra Affair.

In 1986, President Reagan’s then-National Security Advisor, John Poindexter, sent letters to the chairmen of two House committees falsely stating that the National Security Council staff had not violated federal law by providing military support to the rebel “Contras” then attempting to overthrow the “Sandinista” government of Nicaragua.

Poindexter also arranged a meeting between National Security Council staff member Oliver North and Members of the House Intelligence Committee, at which North denied giving military advice and fund-raising aid to the Contras, when in fact he had.

Thereafter, the Independent Counsel who had been appointed to investigate the Iran/Contra Affair secured a five-count indictment against Poindexter. Two of those counts charged Poindexter with violating 18 U.S.C. § 1505 on the ground that he “corruptly obstructed” Congress by making false and misleading statements to Members of the Congress.

At the time, that obstruction statute provided, in relevant part:
“Whoever corruptly … influences, obstructs, or impedes … the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress shall be fined not more than $ 5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”
Poindexter was convicted of these and other charges at trial. In his subsequent appeal, Poindexter argued that the inclusion of the word “corruptly” in the obstruction statute rendered it unconstitutionally vague.

The D.C. Circuit agreed, holding that the term “corruptly” was an “almost boundless” term that that was “too vague to provide constitutionally adequate notice that it prohibit[ed] lying to the Congress.”

Given the facial vagueness of the word “corruptly,” the court engaged in a thorough review of both the legislative history of the statute and of judicial interpretations of it to see if either provided a narrower definition of “corruptly” that was “clear[ ] enough to have put a reasonable person on notice” of it.

The D.C. Circuit found that “neither the legislative history nor the prior judicial interpretation of [the statute] supplie[d] the constitutionally required notice that the statute on its face lack[ed].”
It therefore determined that the statute was unconstitutionally vague as applied to Poindexter’s conduct.

The statutory provision that the Poindexter Court found too vague to pass constitutional muster is materially identical to the language in § 1512(c)(2) with which many of the Jan. 6 defendants are charged.

As Crowl’s attorney aptly stated in her motion to dismiss, “nothing in § 1512(c)(2) would have given fair notice to … any person of common intelligence, that if he entered the United States Capitol for a short time, without injuring anyone or damaging any property while associated with others seeking to petition the Congress his conduct would run afoul of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) and subject him to imprisonment for a term of 20 years.”

Legislative History
Nor did the legislative history of the statute or prior court decisions interpreting it put any reasonable person on notice, either.

Congress intended § 1512(c) – which was enacted as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – to broaden punishment for document destruction. As the Supreme Court explained in Yates v. United States, this was prompted by revelations of Enron’s massive accounting fraud and of the fact that the company’s outside auditor, Arthur Andersen LLP, “had systematically destroyed potentially incriminating documents.”

There is nothing in the legislative history that supports the notion that Congress enacted § 1512(c)(2) to criminalize the disruption of a Congressional proceeding by persons engaged in a political rally.

This conclusion is reinforced when § 1512(c)(2) is read in context with other federal criminal statutes. For instance, 18 U.S.C. § 1505 prohibits using threats or force to “obstruct” a “pending proceeding” before a federal “department or agency” or an “investigation” being conducted by Congress. Had Congress wanted to criminalize protests at the Capitol designed to interfere with all Congressional proceedings, not just investigations, it easily could have expanded § 1505 to say so.

And, 18 U.S.C. § 1507 forbids “picketing or parading” near a federal courthouse with the “intent of “obstructing … the administration of justice.” Had Congress wanted to ban picketing at the Capitol, it could have extended the reach of Section 1507 beyond federal courthouses.

By doing neither of these things, Congress made clear its intention to not criminalize as obstruction brief trespasses into the Capitol as part of a political demonstration.

Prior Court Decisions
Past court rulings also undercut the government’s use of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) against those who participated in the events at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

While that statute prohibits individuals from “corruptly obstructing” official proceedings, courts have interpreted those terms to include making false statements (see here, here, here and here), encouraging others to do so (here and here), falsifying documents, destroying evidence, thwarting a criminal investigation, or intimidating witnesses in a criminal proceeding.

None of these things happened on Jan. 6.

Further, demonstrators often disrupt congressional proceedings. Here are some examples:

The use of § 1512(c)(2) to prosecute demonstrators is novel. Other than the Jan. 6 cases, no reported cases prosecuted under § 1512(c)(2) since its passage in 2002 have involved a claim that demonstrations that disrupted an official proceeding committed an obstruction offense under § 1512(c)(2).

Recall that hundreds of protestors “broke through Capitol Police barricades” before “storming” the Capitol Building during the Justice Kavanaugh confirmation hearings. Despite the fact that Congress was disrupted when the protestors invaded the Capitol Building in the middle of the Justice’s confirmation hearings, these arrestees were not charged with 20-year obstruction offenses under § 1512(c)(2), but with misdemeanors under D.C. Code §22-1307.

Conclusion
In the Jan. 6 cases, the Biden Administration and its media allies have persisted in pushing a calumny that the defendants all participated in an organized conspiracy of bloodthirsty insurrectionists whose purpose was to overthrow the government and savage any elected official who approved of electoral votes for Joe Biden.

As I explained here, the DOJ – with the willing cooperation of pusillanimous judges – threw many Jan. 6 defendants into indefinite solitary confinement in federal lockups. This glaringly unconstitutional deprivation of liberty didn’t trouble the left in the least.

Nor did the ACLU crowd utter a peep about how such pressure tactics were designed to force guilty pleas.

Did the left, which stridently believes in emptying prisons of violent felons, speak out when a federal judge threw the book at a demonstrator without a criminal history who had committed no violence or property damage, but had simply taken a selfie and prayed during the 15 minutes he was inside the Capitol? Nope.

As more facts surrounding the events of Jan. 6 have come to light, it has become more apparent that the government’s case is built on shifting sand.

As I detailed here, the government admitted that its claim that rioters breached the barricades and entered the area around the Capitol was false.

Equally untrue was the government’s assertion that U.S. Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by violent seditionists – a canard that I wrote about here.

And, in the most recent blow to the government’s conspiracy claims, it was revealed that an FBI informant embedded within a group of Proud Boys who were present at the Capitol on Jan. 6 provided the agency with real-time knowledge of what was taking place, including that the group had no plans to attack the Capitol.

To be sure, some of those who participated in the demonstration at the Capitol acted violently toward law enforcement, and they should be held criminally responsible for their actions.

But relatively few demonstrators behaved this way. According to the DOJ, of the 654 people who were arrested in connection with the Jan. 6 riot, only 55 people – a paltry 8 percent – were charged with using a weapon or causing injury to an officer.

The vast majority of people who participated in the events of Jan. 6 simply walked into the Capitol and spent about 15 minutes there posing for selfies and posting pictures on social media.

Yet just as the government has flexed the facts to fit its narrative, it’s now also trying mightily to bend the law. The fact of the matter is that there is no reasonable and readily apparent interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) that would have put any of the Jan. 6 defendants on notice that their attendance at the demonstration at the Capitol that day – a protected activity under the First Amendment – or their mere presence inside the Capitol as part of that protest, constituted a felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

It’s not just the Jan. 6 defendants who will suffer from the DOJ’s Machiavellian predation on our justice system – it is all of us, regardless of political affinity.

Nearly 150 years ago, in United States v. Reese, the Supreme Court presciently stated:
“It would certainly be dangerous if the legislature could set a net large enough to catch all possible offenders, and leave it to the courts to step inside and say who could be rightfully detained, and who should be set at large.”
Biden’s DOJ found just such a net in 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).

And soon, when the court rules on Donovan Crowl’s motion to dismiss, we’ll find out whether the judiciary has accepted the invitation to step inside.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic
Computer Programmer Testifies He Was Hired To Rig Elections 6:10 min

Computer Programmer Testifies He Was Hired To Rig Elections
KanekoaTheGreat Published September 27, 2021

Computer Programmer Testifies He Was Hired To Rig Elections

A video of computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis testifying under oath in front of the U.S. House Judiciary claiming that he was hired by authorities to help rig the outcome of U.S. elections.

Curtis told the court in 2000 that he was hired by Congressman Tom Freeny to build prototype software that would allow authorities to push the results to a 51/49 outcome if needed.

Clinton Eugene “Clint” Curtis is an American attorney, computer programmer and ex-employee of NASA and ExxonMobil.

This is a scene from a 2006 documentary entitled, Eternal Vigilance: The Fight to Save Our Election System.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Your votes have been stolen with algorithms and computers since 2000. 11:58 min

Your votes have been stolen with algorithms and computers since 2000.
DefendingTheRepublic.org Published September 28, 2021
BREAKING NEWS | They knew—and they know—including key government officials and lots of dirty politicians. Your votes have been stolen with algorithms and computers since 2000.

Original Video:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcOFBu-Thds
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

1632987383722.png

The CyFIR Report on Friday showed the digital findings from Maricopa County’s forensic audit of the 2020 election. Founder Ben Cotton and his team allegedly found instances of cybersecurity breaches and malfeasance on the part of Maricopa County. Cotton remarked at one point in his presentation, “The election was neither accountable or secure.”

CyFIR’s founder, Ben Cotton, is no stranger to the world of digital forensics. “A technical visionary and pioneer in Cyber Security and Computer Forensics for the U.S. Government and the SOCOM,” Cotton’s bio states:

“[Mr. Cotton is a] twenty-one year veteran of the US Army, Special Operations Command (SOCOM). Mr. Cotton served in both unclassified and classified units fighting the Global War on Terrorism, specializing in sensitive site and digital device exploitation, Computer Network Attack (CNA), and Computer Network Defense (CND).”

Cyber Ninjas’ Vol. 3 “Result Details” shows the details of CyFIR’s findings. The malfeasance and possible criminal activity found by CyFIR shows significant cybersecurity issues; file and log deletions, dual boot hard drives, internet connections, overwriting of data—and the evidence to back up their findings. According to Cotton, neither of the two Maricopa County “audits” found evidence of internet connections.

Cybersecurity issues found by CyFIR were:

  • The Maricopa County 2020 election was breached.
  • No security patches done in two years since the purchase of the system.
  • No anti-virus updates in two years since installation.
  • Same name, same password with Admin privileges throughout the system for the entire County.
  • The oldest date on the security log was 2/5/2021, with no inclusion of the election period.
  • The County did not provide Windows Security Logs.
  • Dual, bootable hard drives were found internally in the system, both bootable to different configurations.
  • One of the hard drives included outside information from Washington State and South Carolina.

CyFIR/Withheld Devices and Data

According to CyFIR’s report, the cyber security failures and breaches were significant and many.


CyFIR/CyberSecurity Issues

Additionally, CyFIR found “clear intentional overwriting of the security logs by the EMSADMIN Account.” CyFIR stated they have video footage of who was at the keyboard when the files were deleted.

File deletions were numerous on two drives and three of four HiPro Scanners:
  • 865 directories and 85,673 election-related files were deleted between 10/28/20 and 11/05/20 from the EMS C:\ Drive.
  • 9,571 directories and 1,064,746 election-related files were deleted between 11/01/20 and 03/16/21 on the EMS D:\ Drive.
  • HiPro 1 Scanner, 304 directories and 59,387 files containing election data were deleted on 03/03/21.
  • HiPro 3 Scanner, 1,016 directories and 196,463 files containing election data deleted on 03/03/21.
  • HiPro 4 Scanner, 981 directories and 191,295 files containing election data deleted on 03/03/21.
59 EMS listening ports were open on the server and SQL logs indicate that general election results were purged from EMS on February 1st, 2021. Cotton stated they were purged, “right before the two audits performed by the County were due to commence.”

1632987929671.png

Ben Cotton explained:

“If you look at that last bullet—first-in, first-out (FIFO) approach—all of a sudden it becomes readily apparent as to what happened on these distinct dates.

So on each of these dates, an individual executed a script, and that script repeatedly looked for a blank password for all of the accounts on the system. Depending on the system, there were only about 16 accounts that were present on a given system. So this script was run multiple times.

On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by this script. on the 3rd of March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by this same script— On the 12th, which is the day before we received the system, there were 330 log entries overwritten by that script.

Now, the challenge here is that I know that this occurred. I know which account did it. It was the EMS Admin account.

If you reflect back to what I just said about the lack of accountability of assigning that username to an individual—it now becomes extremely difficult to prove who did it. Luckily, we happen to have some historical data from MTEC video feeds—and so we leverage that data to backtrack and align these times and we have captured screenshots of Maricopa County people at the keyboards during those time periods.”


Cotton’s full presentation begins at the 30-minute mark.

View: https://youtu.be/AazyTCJ9wrM
2:19:59 min

Resistance and obstruction has plagued the audit from beginning to end. Subpoenas were sent to the Maricopa Board of Supervisors demanding the above equipment and an agreement to give them to the Senate was reached on Sept. 20. The Senate has yet to say when the investigation of the routers and Splunk logs will begin.

In addition to the above items that were never delivered, Cyber Ninjas also reported that Maricopa County never provided a full accounting of how many ballots it received for its audits. Undeliverable ballots and systems to access the voter rolls were also never provided by the County.

A full Senate-run canvass was obstructed by the Democrats and the federal government—even though one was specified in the original contract. Liz Harris and her volunteers performed a canvass whose results were officially announced on Sept. 8.


Cyber Ninjas Report/Vol.3

Reports are forthcoming on the paper used and the subpoenaed materials, including router and Splunk log data, admin passwords, and hardware keys. The paper used for the ballots could be a critical data point in the audit.

Jovan Hutton Pulitzer says that the public knows only about 50 percent of the truth so far. Pulitzer is currently under an NDA because he has yet to present his full findings regarding what paper was actually used and the kinematic artifacts.

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1OyKADMldOWxb 18:21 min

1632987750897.png

The audits conducted by Maricopa County were not anywhere close in scale or granularity to forensic audits led by Cyber Ninjas. Intelligence Analyst, Phil Waldron told Patrick Byrne in a video conference review of the report, “Other devices were connected to the election system, which is a decertification event.”

As a result of the audit, AG Brnovich has now requested from Maricopa County the preservation of information as it relates to the 2020 election. He also requested the unredacted audit reports from the State Senate:



Brnovich Letter to MCBOS/preservation/9/27/21

Senator Kelly Townsend, in a 1487 request, asked Brnovich to investigate—raising issues that were not covered in the Senate audit report. Brnovich turned her down. She refers to state law that says the AG is obligated by law to investigate. The links for her questions can be found here.

Townsend explained on her Telegram Channel that for a special session to be called:

The AZ Constitution requires 2/3 of the Legislators to sign a petition. (Article 4, Part 2, Section 1). You can see we will need 4 Democrats in the Senate and 9 in the House. Without them, we cannot call the special session. That leaves us with section 3, where the Governor calls the session. Therefore, let’s push for the Governor to call us in to address the illegal votes in the AZ 2020 General Election and to propose legislation that will pass in time for the 2022 primary to prevent the same thing from happening again.

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors stated via Twitter it will respond to the claims in the forensic audit.

1632987682468.png

The recommendations based on audit findings from Cyber Ninjas for legislative consideration can be found here. Senate President, Karen Fann, held a press conference after Friday’s hearing, saying she has questions—some things “aren’t making sense” and need further scrutiny.

1632987630568.png

UncoverDC has written several articles starting with one summarizing the Sept. 24 hearing and the Cyber Ninjas report. This article is the third in a series breaking down the three individual three audit reports presented on Friday. An article referencing the EchoMail/Dr. Shiva Addayurai report will be published soon.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

(Read the rest of the article on the website)

How to Predict Election Results Using Registration Data
This article is part of a series on Identifying Electoral Fraud Using Trend Analysis.
We recommend reading Part 4: When Winning Margins Go “Off the Charts” first, in order to understand the context.

Did you know that the numbers of voters registered for each party is a strong predictor of a final election result? In this article you’ll learn how to use these party registration numbers to predict the election results for a state or county. We’ll also compare this prediction with actual 2020 election results to assess the likely validity of those results, and derive a formula for an estimate of “excess” votes.''

Seth Keshel used this method to correctly predict the outcome of all 50 states at the 2016 General Election, as well as his heat maps of suspicious counties in 2020. This section is heavily inspired from his work.

Contents
  1. Introductory Walkthrough — Westmoreland County, PA
    1. PGap
    2. Registration Numbers
    3. Vote Increase
    4. “Votes / Registrations” Ratio
    5. Analysis
  2. Seth Keshel’s Videos
  3. Summary
Let’s jump right in with a case study of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania.

Introductory Walkthrough — Westmoreland County, PA
In order to perform this analysis we start by collating the total votes by party and total voter registrations by party for the last several years, for the particular county we’re interested in.

This data can usually be downloaded directly from your Secretary of State’s website, or from US Election Atlas which has a lot of free information online or detailed spreadsheets available for purchase.

Here’s our data for Westmoreland County, from 2000–2020:


We’ve abbreviated the column names, but here’s what they mean:
TVTotal Votes Counted in Election
TRTotal Registrations
RRRepublican Registrations
DRDemocrat Registrations
OROther Registrations
RVRepublican Votes
DVDemocrat Votes
OVOther Votes
From this information we can then calculate a few other numbers:
  • The increase/decrease in votes and registrations between elections for each party
  • The percentage share of votes and registrations each party has
  • The “Votes / Registrations” ratio for each party (sometimes referred to as the “turnout”)
Here’s our updated spreadsheet:



Here are the abbreviations for each additional column. Refer back to this table as you need to throughout the article.

RRPRepublican Registrations as Percentage of Total
DRPDemocrat Registered as Percentage of Total
ORPUnaffiliated (Other) Voters as Percentage of Total
PGapPercentage Gap between Republican and Democrat Registration Percentages (RRP – DRP)
RRIRepublican Registration Increase (the change from previous election)
DRIDemocrat Registration Increase (the change from previous election)
ORIUnaffiliated (Other) Registration Increase (the change from previous election)
RVPRepublican Votes as Percentage of Total
DVPDemocrat Votes as Percentage of Total
OVPUnaffiliated (Other) Votes as Percentage of Total
TVITotal Vote Increase (the change from previous election)
RVIRepublican Vote Increase (the change from previous election)
DVIDemocrat Vote Increase (the change from previous election)
OVIUnaffiliated (Other) Vote Increase (the change from previous election)
T/TRTotal Turnout (Votes) Divided by Total Registrations (TV ÷ TR)
T/RRRepublican Turnout (Votes) Divided by Republican Registrations (RV ÷ RR)
T/DRDemocrat Turnout (Votes) Divided by Democrat Registrations (DV ÷ DR)
Some of these columns are important to understand, so let’s explain them.

PGap
This column is very important and features pre-eminently in a lot of Seth Keshel’s videos.

PGap is calculated by subtracting the Democrat Registration Percentage from the Republican Registration Percentage (RRP — DRP).

For the states that keep registrations records, the registration numbers can be analyzed before an election takes place. This is exactly what Seth did in 2016 and 2020. He calculated the PGap trend to correctly predict the outcome of all 50 states at the 2016 General Election.

It is a powerful leading indicator.



By looking at the PGap values over the different years, we begin to see a trend. From 2000 to 2020, we can see the Democrat Registration Percentage is decreasing and the Republican Registration Percentage is increasing each election, as it votes steadily more Republican each time.

The PGap went from a Democrat lead of 26.9% in 2000 to a Republican lead of 6.4% in 2020.

Registration Numbers
If we look at the raw registration numbers by party we can see that there has been an exodus from the Democrat party to the Republican party.


Keep these 2020 numbers in mind, which we’ll explain further below:
  • 15,880 new people registered with the Republican party
  • 10,167 people de-registered from the Democrat party
(Read the rest of the article on the website)
 

marsh

TB Fanatic
Professor David Clements Is Back Again!!
1:00:23 min

Professor David Clements Is Back Again!!
ConservativeDaily Published September 29, 2021

Joe, the Professor, and Max go live to discuss Leftist lies...

Today, we joined by April Moss, a former Detroit weathercaster who was fired by CBS earlier this year for announcing on-air that she would doing an interview with Project Veritas about CBS' descrimination against unvaccinated employees.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
A big equine THANK YOU for Marsh for keeping this thread going - and putting time & effort to filter off the MSM "poop."

ONe would NEVER see any of this if it weren't for this thread.

You human, are a PATRIOT.



Dobbin
 

President Trump Posts Letter from Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright – Puts Maricopa County on NOTICE: Preservation Of Evidence/Litigation Hold

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 29, 2021 at 7:45am

President Trump issued a Save America statement yesterday to remind America of the notice of claim issued to Maricopa County requesting preservation of evidence.

The mainstream media outlets that actually covered this huge event did a shoddy job at best of reporting this new investigation from the Arizona Attorney General’s office.

Yesterday, The Gateway Pundit reported that Attorney General Mark Brnovich sent letters to both Maricopa County and The Arizona Senate.

President Trump on Tuesday night posted the letter from Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright to Maricopa County officials.

Wright told Maricopa County officials to preserve their evidence!




Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright issued the following notice to the county on Monday following the damning Arizona audit report.




Maricopa County must now follow these commands and answer to the Attorney General.

** You Can Contact Attorney General Mark Brnovich Here — Urge AG Brnovich to do something about these election results!

You mean there’s stuff they haven’t deleted already?
 

marsh

TB Fanatic
[COMMENT: tb2k server is no longer accepting my image copies, so the usual GWP prior story images have not been included]


BREAKING: THE LIST – Nearly 700,000 Maricopa County Ballots Identified with Issues from the Audit and Separate Canvassing Work to Date

By Joe Hoft
Published September 30, 2021 at 7:00am


We determined that nearly 700,000 ballots in Maricopa County have issues as identified during the recent audit and canvassing of the county. These issues are not likely mutually exclusive but give a very good indication that the 2020 Election in Arizona was full of hundreds of thousands of invalid ballots.



We’ve put together our updated list of issues identified over the past few weeks related to the 2020 Election in Arizona. After the canvassing and the audit reports were finalized, we’ve identified nearly 700,000 ballots at issue (which may not be mutually exclusive).

The largest issue reported was related to early voting files which do not include early votes included in the final voted file.



The second-largest issue we noted in the Cyber Ninja report included 86,000 ballots where the insureds have no related fingerprints at all, which in this day and age seems unlikely.

Cyber Ninja’s also listed more than 57,000 issues in ballots in various areas.

From Dr. Shiva’s presentation and report we found 17,000 ballot envelopes that were duplicates and another 9,000 ballot envelopes that were missing where Maricopa County claimed they were provided. In addition, there were 2,500 issues with signatures even though a signature check was not included in the scope of the audit. Also, the audit had no chain of custody review of required documentation.

In addition, there were an estimated 270,000 ballots with issues identified in the canvassing work done outside the audit.

In all, there are nearly 700,000 issues with ballots were identified between the audit and canvassing in Arizona. These issues may not be mutually exclusive but they do indicate that the 2020 Election was a total scam.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

MUST WATCH: Babylon Bee Produces HILARIOUS Video Mocking FBI Agent’s Role In Domestic Terror Plots

By Patty McMurray
Published September 30, 2021 at 10:33am

100 Percent Fed Up – The Babylon Bee is a right-leaning satire site that regularly produces some of the funniest content on the internet. On Monday, The Babylon Bee released a hilarious videotaped skit depicting FBI agents orchestrating a domestic terror attack on the Capitol. The scene mocks FBI agents who allegedly set up Trump supporters on January 6th.

The video opens with an image of a Confederate flag and the words “Undisclosed Location” at the bottom of the screen. The next shot includes a picture of a marked-up map with strings and push pins, along with guns and bandanas (disguises) lying on top of the map. The words “MAGA Country” are added under “Undisclosed Location.”



The opening scene reveals the FBI ringleader giving instructions to his cohort Garth, “Alright, enough talk, it’s time to take action! Garth, repeat the plan.”

“The plan is simple,” Garth says.

The FB ringleader interrupts him, “Repeat the plan, emphasizing the most illegal parts, speaking audibly, loud enough for, say, a tiny microphone to hear—and also, state your full name.”



“OK, the plan is simple. We break into the Capitol building—we infiltrate the government and kidnap the Speaker of the House. And this is Garth Henderson speaking,” the MAGA hat, Miller beer/Trump t-shirt wearing FBI agent says.

The FBI ringleader suddenly turns around and speaks into a microphone in his jacket collar, asking, “Did you get that? We’ve got everything we need!” as he turns to the men at the planning table and draws his gun, screaming to everyone to “get down” warning them that a squad of FBI agents are on their way. Hilariously, everyone in the room draws their guns and points them at each other.

A large red-headed MAGA hat-wearing man at the table who’s wearing a hilarious fake black mustache shouts, “You FBI scum! You’re all scum! You’ll never take us alive. We’re the true patriots, standing up for liberty and stuff!” Suddenly, the FBI ringleader recognizes “Steve” and calls him out by name. The red-headed man with the bad mustache admits he hasn’t been around the office because he’s been working undercover.



The hilarity continues, as an emotional FBI agent with a fake suicide bomb around his waist recalls happier times when the agents in the room worked together to create a phony kidnapping plot against Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and how they built a lego model of the Capitol together.

The FBI agents realize they are the only ones in on the January 6th Capitol “insurrection plot” and that there are no actual Trump supporters in the room. So they put down their guns, and the ring leader suggests they move forward with the plot to set up the Trump supporters—because, after all, they don’t want to let all of their hard work go to waste.

Watch:

View: https://youtu.be/xmJ0HDbZi5M
4:12 min

The Babylon Bee skit would be even funnier if it weren’t true. The FBI deserves to be mocked for setting up Trump supporters and for faking kidnapping plots like the one in Michigan.

Democrat Governor Whitmer has been using the so-called “kidnapping plot” to invoke sympathy almost every time she is attacked for her draconian lockdown orders or the deaths she caused when she sent COVID positive patients into nursing homes in her state.

When our intelligence agencies are being used as a tool to help Democrats deflect from the horrible truth about their dishonesty party, America is in big trouble.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

“There Were Large Pieces Torn Off – Bubbles Being Filled Absolutely Perfect – 60,000 Illegal Ballots” – AZ Audit Volunteers Speak Out on Disturbing Findings — MUST SEE VIDEO

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 30, 2021 at 8:15am


The historic Arizona forensic audit has concluded and the hardworking Arizonans who volunteered their time and efforts to fight for our election integrity are finally speaking out.

They have been under nondisclosure agreements until now, and they can reveal what they saw while counting ballots in the Veterans Memorial Coliseum.




In this video, volunteers share their stories about why they chose to participate and they detail the disturbing election irregularities and anomalies they discovered.



Some of these observers were seen on the floor of the coliseum nearly every single day, working to fix Arizona’s elections.

The Gateway Pundit Correspondent Jordan Conradson volunteered to observe this “gold standard” audit in May, and his findings showed that this was a true full forensic audit.

These volunteers have been discredited and lied about since day one of this audit, and the media spin continues to this day with the detractors now saying “Biden won.”

They will never unsee their historic findings.



The people behind this video are individual American citizens who stepped up to help others hear the voices of our fellow citizens. This is non-partisan, and inclusive of all citizens, regardless of ideology. Every one of our voices matters, and WILL be heard. Our elections are to be decided by US; not big tech, not big media, not big pharma, and not by anyone else, regardless of how much money they have or how long they’ve been in office. We will not be divided any longer.
The audit was designed to be a comprehensive review of the results from the Maricopa County 2020 general election to confirm the effectiveness of existing legislation in governing elections, and to provide additional insights on possible areas of information-based legislative reform that could ensure an even greater level of integrity and accuracy in how elections are conducted.
The non-disclosure agreements have now been lifted…
Maricopa County Audit of 2020 Election
April 22nd -September 24th, 2021.
2.1M ballots processed by hand
Over 1,500 Volunteers donating over 100,000 hours
All counters were Maricopa residents who voted in the last election.

Much more to come in the following weeks…this is merely the beginning.
Sign up for more HERE!



The weight of the world now lies on Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s shoulders.

AG Brnovich recently issued a notice of claim to the county commanding them to preserve all evidence.

The fate of the free world is in the hands of Mark Brnovich.

Contact him NOW and demand indictments!



Watch and SHARE for the World to see:
video at a1000cuts.org

Rumble video 7:07 min

 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Arizona AG Demands Maricopa County Freeze All 2020 Election Materials, Releases Statement On Audit

By Amanda Prestigiacomo
Sep 30, 2021 DailyWire.com

Contractors working for Cyber Ninjas, who was hired by the Arizona State Senate, examine and recount ballots from the 2020 general election at Veterans Memorial Coliseum on May 8, 2021 in Phoenix, Arizona.
\Courtney Pedroza for the Washington Post via Getty Images

Following the release of a report on the 2020 election audit in Maricopa County, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich has demanded a freeze on all election-related materials as the office preps for litigation and further investigation.

The Arizona Attorney General’s Office Election Integrity Unit (EIU) on Monday sent a letter to the Arizona Senate “requesting supporting documents from the report released last week,” a press release detailed. “Additionally, the EIU asked Maricopa County to preserve all documents and data related to the 2020 election.”

“Wright lists some of the items to be preserved, including all of the ballots and envelopes as well as logs that the county refused to turn over to the auditors,” The Star News Network reported.

A draft report of the 2020 election review in Maricopa County “confirms the county’s canvass of the 2020 General Election was accurate and the candidates certified as the winners did, in fact, win,” county officials said announced this week.

The report suggested, however, that ballots were mishandled or even deleted — allegations that Maricopa County denies. Republican legislators in Arizona, who referred concerns about Maricopa’s election process to Brnovich, told the Arizona Mirror that the audit’s findings on who won 2020 the presidential election are immaterial and that Brnovich should investigate any alleged errors or mishandling reported in the audit.

“Arizona voters deserve an unimpeachable electoral process—and the State Senate is already working hard on new legislation to deliver that,” Arizona Senate President Karen Fann said in a letter to Brnovich. “As the Senate enters that next phase, there are several items in the reports that merit the attention of your office.”

The county also defended itself from allegations of wrongdoing on social media, claiming last week that the draft report had “errors” and “faulty conclusions.”

“Unfortunately, the report is also littered with errors & faulty conclusions about how Maricopa County conducted the 2020 General Election,” officials said.

“The Arizona Senate’s report that was released on Friday raises some serious questions regarding the 2020 election,” AG Brnovich said in a statement posted to the Attorney General’s office website. “Arizonans can be assured our office will conduct a thorough review of the information we receive.”

Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright said in a letter to the county that the office expects “further investigation or litigation,” following a review of the audit report, which was released last week.

“In light of our review, as well as the expectation the review may lead to further investigation or litigation, this letter is to provide notice to Maricopa County that a litigation hold should be in effect regarding all potentially relevant materials related to the 2020 General Election, as well as potentially relevant materials related to the 2020 Primary Election and 2020 Presidential Preference Election (combined referred to as ‘2020 Statewide Elections’),” the letter said.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Dominion in U.S. District Court, Colorado

September 30, 2021
in National, News, NEWSROOM




A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dominion Voting Systems and related entities alleging that the election agent has infringed on the rights of ordinary Americans “under the First Amendment to participate in the public debate regarding election integrity and security.”

The defendants are US Dominion, Inc., Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., and Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, which are charged in the complaint with trying “to intimidate Americans by waging and threatening to wage Lawsuit Warfare (“Lawfare”) against anyone that speaks about anything related to Dominion’s possible role in election integrity and security.”

Plaintiffs include JENNIFER L. COOPER, EUGENE DIXON, FRANCIS J. CIZMAR, ANNA PENNALA, KATHLEEN DAAVETTILA, CINTHIA BRUNELL, KARYN CHOPJIAN, and ABBIE HELMINEN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated.

This is breaking news and will be updated.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

It Wasn’t Just the FBI – The Capitol Police Also Had at Least 3 Operatives Planted Inside the Jan. 6 Trump Protests

By Jim Hoft
Published September 30, 2021 at 8:56pm

American Stasi

The FBI admitted last week to The New York Times that they were running informants and operatives inside groups attending the January 6 rallies in Washington DC.

The FBI finally admitted they infiltrated the Jan. 6 rallies with informants. In fact, one of the first “protesters” inside the US Capitol was an FBI informant.

We all already knew this was happening as TGP reported back in July that an one undercover FBI informant was pushing a DEA agent to enter the US Capitol on Jan. 6.

And we also have proof that the FBI attempted to recruit ex-military to infiltrate pro-Trump groups.

Now there is also proof that the US Capitol Police were also running informants and operatives inside the Trump crowd including members who entered the US Capitol with the protesters.

Via Julie Kelly.

1633058947546.png



The Capitol Police also killed two female Trump supporters that day.

They sure were busy.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Far Left Judge Marie Avery Moses Issues Protective Order on Eric Coomer’s Deposition After He Comes Across as Completely Unhinged – But Not on Defendants Including The Gateway Pundit

By Jim Hoft
Published September 30, 2021 at 5:45pm

What double standard?

The American left is out to destroy the justice system in the country today.

Attorney Sidney Powell announced during an interview last week that her legal team will depose Dominion’s Eric Coomer for questioning later in the day.

Coomer sued several Trump supporters, media outlets and media personalities following the 2020 presidential election, including Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Michelle Malkin, Joe Oltmann, The Gateway Pundit and Jim Hoft, among others.

Eric Coomer was deposed for an hour by Powell’s attorneys last week.

From what we are hearing it was a complete disaster. The Dominion executive came across completely unhinged and angry.

That’s when far left Judge Marie Avery Moses stepped in to protect Eric Coomer.


Judge Moses issued a Protective Order that only grants secrecy to Eric Coomer’s deposition – but not anyone else’s.

According to our confidential source, “The Judge issued this order sua sponte, which means that no one asked her to do this. She just did it on her own the day after Coomer gave a train-wreck deposition in which he was very clearly emotionally unstable, arrogant, and repeatedly failed to give direct answers to questions. He was clearly playing games and his testimony is simply not credible.”

The media is now blocked from downloading his testimony.

One wonders how the Judge came to this conclusion – the day after Coomer’s deposition – that his deposition transcript needed to be sealed.

What happened to integrity, honesty and justice in America?

Here is the court order by Judge Moses.







 

marsh

TB Fanatic
A big equine THANK YOU for Marsh for keeping this thread going - and putting time & effort to filter off the MSM "poop."

ONe would NEVER see any of this if it weren't for this thread.

You human, are a PATRIOT.



Dobbin
You are most gracious, dear steed.
I can only hope that my daily eforts have raised the awareness of others as to the peril in which we find our liberties and our beloved Constitutional republic. It is a battle I have been fighting much of my adult career, and I intend to go out swinging.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

NOW DELAWARE: With Only 10% of 2020 Election Results Audited, 20,000 Invalid or Suspect Ballots Identified

By Joe Hoft
Published October 1, 2021 at 9:54am

A report released from a voter group in Delaware shows it’s quite possible Joe Biden didn’t even win his home state in the 2020 Election once invalid and suspect ballots are addressed.

The National File reports:
Delaware saw massive “fraudulent” votes being submitted in the 2020 election and nursing homes that had way more votes submitted than people who lived there, according to 2020 Delaware U.S. Senate candidate Lauren Witzke and a memo from Patriots for Delaware that has been obtained by NATIONAL FILE…
…According to a Patriots for Delaware memo written by Jennifer Cooke: “Patriots for Delaware held a public meeting on Sept. 28 where they relayed some initial findings in reference to their 2020 election canvas that have raised more questions than answers. Not only did dead people vote, there also seems to be a high number of votes coming from some nursing homes who don’t have nearly that many beds.
There are 296 votes that came from a nursing home with only 94 beds. That’s 315% votes coming from a facility that is rarely at full occupancy. There were several other nursing homes that reported over 100%, while most facilities in the state reported anywhere from 0% to 75% votes in relation to available beds. Where are all the people that voted from these nursing homes? How could the nursing homes have been that full, occupancy wise, given the Covid-19 protocol was to lock the facilities down and keep our elderly socially distanced and quarantined? It was also revealed that hundreds upon hundreds of votes from “Uniformed and overseas citizens” had a mailing/residential address listed as the addresses of the three county elections offices in the state. The election law clearly states that these particular voters’ addresses should be listed as their last residential address. People don’t live at the state-owned Carvel building in Wilmington. Are these votes legal?

…Last, is the astronomically high 47,205 ballots sent to adjudication. That amounts to 25% of all mail-in/absentee ballots cast in the state. The FEC allows .0008% of ballots to be sent to adjudication. Clearly something was wrong during the ES&S tabulation machine scanning of these mail-in/absentee ballots to cause so many of them to be deemed unable to read. Furthermore, according to Delaware’s election law, each ballot needed a Republican, a Democrat, and an election judge to view them and decide the voter’s intent. What kind of man hours would it take for elections officials to view every one of those adjudicated ballots? The mail in ballots were not supposed to be opened or counted until Election Day. How did that many ballots get processed in such a short amount of time? Did any of the officials question or raise concern for the amount of adjudications? Were the ES&S tabulation machines calibrated correctly? Were the machines certified? Who certified them? We the People of Delaware deserve to know what happened on Nov. 3, 2020. We should have complete confidence in our elections given that a FREE and FAIR election is the cornerstone of this Constitutional Republic. Our elected representatives and appointed Board of Elections, have a duty to We The People that they have not been living up to. We have questions. We want answers. We will not settle for “There’s nothing I can do” any longer. Audit Delaware.”
Here is a copy of the report.




Did Biden even win Delaware?
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Wisconsin Special Counsel Michael Gableman Issues Subpoenas in His 2020 Election Probe – Will Any Justice Be Served?

By Joe Hoft
Published October 1, 2021 at 10:43am


Wisconsin Special Counsel Michael Gableman has subpoenaed Wisconsin election officials as part of his investigation into the 2020 Election irregularities.


The Wisconsin Special Counsel overseeing an election review in the state has subpoenaed Wisconsin election officials.

Special Counsel Michael Gableman has served subpoenas to the administrator of the Wisconsin Election Commission, the executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, and four city clerks as part of his probe into the 2020 election, “The Dan O’Donnell Show” has learned exclusively.
On Friday morning, subpoenas were served to Wisconsin Election Commission administrator Meagan Wolfe, Milwaukee Election Commission director Claire Woodall-Vogg, the city clerks of Madison, Green Bay, Racine, and Kenosha as well as a former executive assistant to Racine Mayor Cory Mason, sources said.

The subpoenas seek all records related to grants from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), a group funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg that is accused of taking over the administration of the presidential election in Green Bay and having undue influence on election administration in Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha, and Madison.
The five cities, dubbed “The Wisconsin Five,” submitted a joint bid for CTCL grant money to help administer the presidential election. Emails from former Green Bay city clerk Kris Teske revealed earlier this year that a CTCL partner organization, the National Vote at Home Institute, had unlawfully taken over the administration of the city’s election. In Milwaukee, Woodall-Vogg was providing National Vote at Home Wisconsin lead Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein with daily email updates on early voting, and Spitzer-Rubenstein even requested access to the City of Milwaukee’s voter database, which Woodall-Vogg declined.
We know there were numerous issues in Wisconsin in the 2020 Election. Over 140,000 ballots all for Joe Biden were dropped at around 4am in the Milwaukee area. The Election head in that area laughed about this in emails at that time.

Numerous other activities occurred in Madison and Green Bay. Will anything be done or is this just another legal circus to keep those who care about the integrity of our elections at bay?
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Breaking: FBI Arrests Retired Green Beret Jeremy Brown for Attending Jan. 6 Protests and Standing Outside Capitol — AFTER HE REFUSED TO BE THEIR INFORMANT!

By Jim Hoft
Published October 1, 2021 at 7:50am

Jeremy Brown is a Green Beret and former Republican candidate for Congress in Florida’s 14th Congressional District. Brown served in the United States Army from 1992 to 2012 and reached the rank of Special Forces Master Sergeant.

Jeremy also attended the Stop the Steal protests in Washington DC on January 6. Jeremy joined the Oath Keepers in November and went to Washington DC to provide security at the many protests and rallies that week.


Last March, Jeremy Brown started speaking out about how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) contacted him and attempted to recruit him to spy on patriots and everyday Americans.


In December FBI agents contacted Jeremy Brown at his home for “posting some things online.”

Jeremy released video surveillance of the FBI contacting him at his home. And Jeremy released an audio recording of his actual meetup with the FBI. Jeremy struggled for months about whether or not to go public with this information. But according to his Facebook page — “After listening to politicians and the FBI Director, Chris Wray, tell lie after bald-faced lie to the American People, he could not stay silent any longer.”


Jeremy decided his desire to protect and defend the American people and the TRUTH are more important than privacy or personal safety.

Earlier this year Jeremy joined Brandon Gray on Banned.TV to describe what happened to him after he joined the Oath Keepers in November.

Jeremy released a video of his encounter with government officials when they came to his home. Jeremy also released audio of his meeting with the FBI at a local restaurant.

Jeremy explains in his recent video that the FBI called his cellphone and asked for a meeting after trying to contact him at his house. Jeremy then met with the FBI agents at a restaurant in Ybor City in December. He told Brandon Gray that 38 seconds into the interview the FBI attempted to recruit him to spy on the Oath Keepers.

The Gateway Pundit spoke with Jeremy Brown earlier this year. Jeremy is SAFE, but laying low and keeping on the move until he says he has “a full grasp on any fallout that is sure to result.”

Jeremy recorded his interview with the FBI in Florida. He recorded and released the entire conversation to BanThis.TV.

This is really shocking information. The FBI is working to infiltrate patriot groups of retired military personnel who take an oath to uphold the US Constitution.

This is happening in America! And this took place BEFORE January 6th.


Banned video on website 2:04:43 min

On Thursday afternoon at 3:45 PM Eastern the FBI raided Jeremy Brown’s home and arrested Jeremy. The charge is trespassing. We were notified this morning by his family and an attorney.

The FBI searched their house, RV, and trailer. And then they arrested Jeremy and took him away.

We will update as we have more information. His family has contacted The Gateway Pundit.
Jeremy Brown refused to be an informant for the dirty FBI — So they stormed his home at 3:45 PM and arrested him on bogus misdemanor charges.

UPDATE (8:15 AM) :
We just spoke with Jeremy’s girlfriend. She tells us Jeremy will have an appearance today in Pinellas County Court. He is charged with trespassing, a misdemeanor.

Jeremy Brown NEVER entered the US Capitol on January 6. His crime was refusing to be an FBI informant.

The FBI sent 20 vehicles for the arrest. DHS and Pinellas County law enforcement were also present. The FBI was in Jeremy’s home for 5-and-a-half hours looking for evidence. We were told this morning that the FBI did not read Jeremy his rights.

Jeremy’s girlfriend is still very upset and could not sleep. She will contact The Gateway Pundit later with updates.

It should be noted that Jeremy Brown told The Gateway Pundit back in June that “scores of guys” had written him saying they were also approached by the FBI to spy on the patriot groups.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

How Does the Voter Ballot Printing Company Fit Into the Arizona Audit Results?

BYTEXANS JACK & DODIEON SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 • ( 1 COMMENT )

Is There a Georgia Election Fraud Connection?

No investigation into election integrity and legalities in Arizona would be complete without taking a serious look into the ballot printing.

Arizona’s Attorney General, Mark Brnovich, requested more information from the Arizona Senate following the release of the report from the forensic audit in Maricopa County last week.

Brnovich

On Monday, Brnovich’s Election Integrity Unit sent a letter regarding the 2020 General Election in Maricopa County.

“The Arizona Senate’s report that was released on Friday raises some serious questions regarding the 2020 election,” Brnovich said. “Arizonans can be assured our office will conduct a thorough review of the information we receive.”

Maricopa County officials in Arizona failed to cooperate on crucial matters in the recent forensic election audit. Evidence was obviously removed or destroyed even prior to their subpoena.

According to “official” results, Joe Biden won over President Donald Trump statewide by only 10,457 votes.
However, the audit revealed serious questions on at least 57,722 ballots, more than five times that number.


Popular meme

  • Tens of thousands of people voted from a prior address, which would technically invalidate the votes if the enforce election law is enforced.
  • 10,342 voters potentially voted in more than one county.
  • Over 9,000 more ballots were returned by voters than were sent out.
  • In over 3,000 instances, the official results do “not match who voted.”
  • There were 2,592 more duplicates than original ballots.
  • There were 2,382 in person voters who had moved out of Maricopa County 29 days prior to the election.
  • 2,081 voters had moved out of state during the 29 days preceding the election.

Hundreds of votes were cast by people who were not part of the official precinct register, or returned by mail from people who had not been sent ballots.

The ballots in Maricopa County were printed by Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix, Arizona, but many questions remain about these particular ballots.

Kevin Runbeck

Who filed a U.S. Patent Application for a computer system for “on-screen ballot duplication” to be used for “generating a revised ballot”?

According to application # 20190311030, Kevin Runbeck did:

1633108627256.png1633108704349.png

1633108755687.png


1633109194787.png

1633109028928.png



Valenzuela
(Note: The reference by Valenzuela has been taken down from the Runbeck website.)

Sworn Testimony
When Rudy Giuliani and Arizona state legislatures held public hearings regarding the Maricopa County election fraud of November 2020, among the most compelling sworn testimonies came from elections witness Jan Bryant.

Her testimony coincided with others and may explain Arizona audit director Ken Bennett’s later revelation that Dominion Voting Systems had refused to comply with a subpoena to turn over passwords to its Maricopa County voting machines.

During the hearing on November 30, 2020, Bryant testified under oath that not even county IT staff were allowed access to the machines.

Bryant witnessed Dominion employees with a laptop computer in the counting room during the six days she worked at the Maricopa County Election Center.

During questioning by Republican state Rep. Mark Finchem, Bryant said there were daily election ballot deliveries to the center by Runbeck Election Services. According to witness testimony, these deliveries happened from Nov. 3 to at least Nov. 10.



Repeated explanations by supervisors at that time was that “Runbeck has high speed scanners,” Bryant said. She was told the ballots were scanned offsite by Runbeck and then delivered to the Maricopa County Election Center.

Transcript Quotes from Bryant’s testimony:
Jan Bryant: …ten days before they quit tabulating they thought they were done. And then more truck loads of ballots would come in. And I’m like, how can you not know how many ballots are still out there.

State House Rep. David L. Cook: Mr. Chairman I’m sorry. WOULD YOU REPEAT THAT. They thought they were done, and then there was WHAT?

Jan Bryant: They thought they were done multiple times. Multiple times the people that were running the rooms thought they were done (counting ballots), or almost done. Or were gonna be done Wednesday morning (Nov. 4th), then Thursday morning (Nov. 5th), then Friday morning. Then it went on the whole next week. And I’m like, I asked the question, You don’t know how many ballots are still left to come in? I don’t know who does, again…process…project management, but zero.

AZ Rep: David L. Cook

State House Rep. Mark Finchem: On that point Ma’am, I’m tracking with you but, what day did the truck show up?

Jan Bryant: Every day, yeah, every day.

Mark Finchem: OK. Just a minute. I want to make sure we capture this properly. So there were trucks that showed up on the 3rd, and then the 4th, and then the 5th, and how long did that go on. How many days?

Jan Bryant: I wasn’t there the whole last week. My last day was the 10th and they were still coming in. They were coming from a company called Runbeck, that does the high speed scanning and printing of duplications, and I think the military ballots. And now I’m getting out of my comfort level here talking about this. I don’t know what they are doing but those ballots are coming in from a high speed scanning company called Runbeck that…. apparently you haven’t heard of Runbeck.

Mark Finchem: No, I’ve heard of Runbeck Ma’am. What I’m trying to figure out is whether they printed them or if they scanned them. And if they scanned them offsite, to what purpose?


Jan Bryant: I can’t tell you.

Mark Finchem: Wasn’t that your job to scan them? I mean, not your job, but the (MCTEC).

Jan Bryant: No, all the high speed scanning happens at Runbeck. So, those ballots go to Runbeck. As far as I know there were no observers there. I don’t know. I never got called to work at Runbeck. That’s all I can tell you.

Mark Finchem: No that’s fine. Your observation is useful here. What you’re telling me is the scanning wasn’t actually done on site at a Maricopa County structure. It was done someplace else.

Jan Bryant: Where they have very high speed scanners.

Mark Finchem: Right now I really don’t care what the speed is. I want to know were they Dominion scanners?
Jan Bryant: No, no, I don’t think it has anything to do with Dominion.

Mark Finchem: I’m trying to understand what was the purpose of scanning them in advance of them being tabulated on the Dominion equipment.

Jan Bryant: They were duplicate, duplications. The ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines.

They were ballots that came in from Military and overseas. But there were more ballots than that. So I don’t know where the rest of them were coming from. Because they kept bringing trays of them in. So I don’t know where they were coming from. That’s a question for the county employees to explain to you, where those ballots came from that whole next week. I don’t know where they came from.


Rudy Giuliani

Rudy Giuliani: So you were there from Nov. 3rd through the 10th. Seven days later (after election) ballots were still coming in.

Jan Bryant: Yes.

Rudy Giuliani: Were those ballots counted?

Jan Bryant: I watched them go through the tabulation machines. And I watched people working on the adjudication of those ballots.

Rudy Giuliani: And how many ballots…

Jan Bryant: Oh, I don’t know.

Rudy Giuliani: What was the largest number you saw in one day. Just a guess. How many cartons?

Jan Bryant: …there was usually 2 or 3 shifts. I wanna say one day they thought 90,000 was a good number, for a shift. And if they were running multiple shifts a day. It was somewhere between the 3rd and the 10th.

State House Rep. Bret Roberts: I am assuming these were not early ballots in any way shape or form. I’m just kind of curious, did anything stand out to you as far as these new ballots, didn’t know where they were coming from, as far as a physical appearance in any way?

Jan Bryant: No. Everything… they just looked like ballots. Just kept coming. They all came in the same bins.

Georgia Sworn Affidavits

Jim Suver is listed on Runbeck Election Services’ website as Vice President of Business Services.

Jim Suver. Kevin Runbeck.

“Jim leads Runbeck’s business development and strategic growth initiatives in all states and specific partner counties. He is also responsible for developing and maintaining strong governmental relationships. In the U.S. elections space, Jim is well-known for establishing and finding value in previously untapped markets. Jim has managed Runbeck’s expansion to 18 states and Washington DC.”

One of the expansion areas for Runbeck Services is Georgia. Of special note is their printing and involvement with the controversial Fulton County election of November 2020.

Judge Amero is a Democratic donor in Georgia, but sworn affidavits from actual election monitors compelled him to order ballot reviews.

According to RealClearInvestigations, (RCI) Fulton County poll manager Suzi Voyles testified she saw ballots marked for Joe Biden were suspiciously pristine and uniform while she was sorting through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November.


When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they’d been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil.
When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they’d been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil.

Adding to suspicions, she noticed that all of the ballots were printed on different stock paper than the others she handled as part of a statewide hand recount of the razor-thin Nov. 3 presidential election. And none was folded or creased, as she typically observed in mail-in ballots that had been removed from envelopes.
In short, the Biden votes looked like they’d been duplicated by a copying machine.
“All of them were strangely pristine,” said Voyles, who said she’d never seen anything like it in her 20 years monitoring elections in Fulton County, which includes much of Atlanta.


More poll workers in Fulton County swore in affidavits that they also observed fake-looking ballots in stacks of absentee ballots for Biden.
Robin Hall, a certified Fulton County recount observer, also testified she witnessed a number of boxes of absentee ballots marked100% for Biden” that appeared to be “perfectly filled out as if they were pre-printed with the presidential candidate selected.”
She stated: “They did not look like a person had filled this out at home. All of them looked alike.”

Judy Aube also worked at the World Congress Center on Nov. 14 where she observed the same thing: “suspicious batches” of mail-in ballots for Biden whose markings appeared identical, as if they had been duplicated by a machine and not filled out by a voter at home.
Barbara Hartman, another election official auditor, also doubted the authenticity of absentee ballots she handled that she said were never folded, as would normally be the case for ballots returned in an envelope by mail or dropped in a box. “The absentee ballots looked as though they had just come from a fresh stack,” she swore in her affidavit. “I could not observe any creases in the ballots and [it] did not seem like they were folded and put into envelopes or mailed out.”
Also, “The majority of the mail-in ballots that I reviewed contained suspicious black perfectly bubbled markings for Biden,” Hartman stated, adding that “they looked as if they were stamped.”
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

More than Half of Trump Voters Would Like to Secede from the Union While Most Americans Believe We’re No Longer a Democracy

By Joe Hoft
Published October 1, 2021 at 1:03pm


Most Trump supporters would like to secede from the Union while most Americans believe we no longer have a democracy per Virginia poll.

Mediaite reported on the poll from Virginia:

— Significant numbers of both Trump and Biden voters show a willingness to consider violating democratic tendencies and norms if needed to serve their priorities. Roughly 2 in 10 Trump and Biden voters strongly agree it would be better if a “President could take needed actions without being constrained by Congress or courts,” and roughly 4 in 10 (41%) of Biden and half (52%) of Trump voters at least somewhat agree that it’s time to split the country, favoring blue/red states seceding from the union.

— On one hand, roughly 80% of Trump and Biden voters view democracy as preferable to any non-democratic kind of government.

— On the other hand, more than 6 in 10 Trump and Biden voters see America as less a representative democracy and more a system that is run by and rigged for the benefit of the wealthy.

Unfortunately for America, the Democrats are at it again. Before the Civil War the Democrats seceded rather than give up their slaves. Now the Democrats are aligning themselves with anti-American policies of censorship, destruction of billions in wealth, murder of those in their way (remember it was four Trump supporters who were murdered on Jan. 6), aligning with fascist groups like BLM and Antifa, election theft, arming the Taliban enemy with $83 billion in US military equipment, using a pandemic to steal American freedoms, false arrests of individuals for fake crimes, government harassment through the courts, and imprisonment based on fake crimes in kangaroo courts, etc.

It’s no surprise Americans want to secede from the Democrats’ national suicide pact, it’s almost a surprise there hasn’t been a more serious discussion before now.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Most Trump supporters would like to secede from the Union while most Americans believe we no longer have a democracy per Virginia poll.
So much for "assent of the governed."

Now a "government of pull." No equality before the law. And you might as well put away your incentive, ingenuity, and acumen as it has no value to you - but will only make someone else wealthy.

"You didn't make that" attitude. The creed of thieves.

Dobbin
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Video Reporter Bobby Powell on Violent Jan. 6 Protester: “This Guy is a Federal Agent – I Have Heard Nothing But Crickets from the FBI On This Guy” (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published October 1, 2021 at 8:37pm


So, just how many FBI informants and infiltrators were involved in the Jan. 6 riot?

And why is the FBI refusing to look for two of the most violent protesters?

Bobby Powell the host of “The Truth is Viral” podcast was invited on OAN in June to discuss his viral video that exposed two likely FBI informants who were filmed breaking windows, attacking the building, and even pushing people inside the US Capitol.


One of the likely FBI operatives was removing glass from a US Capitol windown and caught on video encouraging Trump supporters to go inside. The man had a wire in his ear. The FBI to this day refuses to investigate this individual or even acknowledge his existence.

Instead, the FBI is arresting US veterans and patriots who stood outside the building.

Bobby was on the east side of the US Capitol on Jan. 6. He witnessed several men attacking the building.

Bobby told OAN,
“Two men I saw attacking the building, breaking windows, and even pushing people inside HAVE NOT been arrested. And they are not on the list of suspects being sought by the FBI. Now I provided the FBI with 29 minutes of high definition footage, 1080p, more than five months ago. Neither one of these men has been arrested. They are not in any of the 400+ indictments, I’ve checked them all. There’s not one frame of video not one still photograph on either of these men on the FBI’s webpage that ask people to give them tips on who the rioters were. The FBI’s YouTube channel or their Facebook page. They’re putting up all kinds of fuzzy pictures but they’re not putting up the HDI images that I sent them.”
Bobby and fellow Trump supporters then stood guard at the broken window and refused to allow fellow Trump supporters inside the building!

The police left the US Capitol open. They walked away!


On Friday night Bobby Powell told Greg Kelly he still has not heard back from the FBI after 8 months and he still has not seen this man in their most wanted list.

Bobby is convinced this man is an FBI operative. And he is holding the evidence.

Do you suppose Liz Cheney is looking into this guy?

Previously–

1633142487598.png
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

UPDATE: Court Denies Bail to Jeremy Brown Until Next Tuesday – Former Green Beret Was Arrested Thursday After He Earlier Refused FBI Request to Be Informant Plant at Jan. 6 Rallies

By Jim Hoft
Published October 1, 2021 at 7:16pm


On Thursday afternoon at 3:45 PM Eastern, the FBI raided retired Army Ranger Jeremy Brown’s home and arrested Jeremy. The charge was trespassing. We were notified this morning by his family and an attorney.

The FBI searched their house, RV, and trailer. And then they arrested Jeremy and took him away.

His family contacted The Gateway Pundit this morning.

Jeremy Brown is a Green Beret and former Republican candidate for Congress in Florida’s 14th Congressional District. Brown served in the United States Army from 1992 to 2012 and reached the rank of Special Forces Master Sergeant.

The Gateway Pundit spoke with Jeremy’s girlfriend this morning. She told us Jeremy would appear in Pinellas County Court this afternoon. Jeremy is charged with trespassing, a misdemeanor.

Jeremy Brown NEVER entered the US Capitol on January 6. His crime was refusing to be an FBI informant as we describe below.

The FBI sent 20 vehicles for his arrest. DHS and Pinellas County law enforcement were also present. The FBI was in Jeremy’s home for 5-and-a-half hours looking for evidence. We were told this morning that the FBI did not read Jeremy his rights.

As we reported months ago, Jeremy Brown refused to be an informant for the dirty FBI — They wanted him to be one of their plants at the Jan. 6 Trump rallies. So they stormed his home at 3:45 PM on Thursday and arrested him on bogus misdemeanor charges.

This afternoon Jeremy’s girlfriend contacted The Gateway Pundit following his hearing. Jeremy Brown was denied bail. He will sit in jail until his court hearing on Tuesday.

It should be noted that Jeremy Brown told The Gateway Pundit back in June that “scores of guys” had written him saying they were also approached by the FBI to spy on the patriot groups

Jeremy attended the Stop the Steal protests in Washington DC on January 6. Jeremy joined the Oath Keepers in November and went to Washington DC to provide security at the many protests and rallies that week.


Last March, Jeremy Brown started speaking out about how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) contacted him and attempted to recruit him to spy on patriots and everyday Americans.

In December FBI agents contacted Jeremy Brown at his home for “posting some things online.”

Jeremy released video surveillance of the FBI contacting him at his home. And Jeremy released an audio recording of his actual meetup with the FBI. Jeremy struggled for months about whether or not to go public with this information. But according to his Facebook page — “After listening to politicians and the FBI Director, Chris Wray, tell lie after bald-faced lie to the American People, he could not stay silent any longer.”

Jeremy decided his desire to protect and defend the American people and the TRUTH are more important than privacy or personal safety.

Earlier this year Jeremy joined Brandon Gray on Banned.TV to describe what happened to him after he joined the Oath Keepers in November.

Jeremy released a video of his encounter with government officials when they came to his home. Jeremy also released audio of his meeting with the FBI at a local restaurant.

Jeremy explains in his video that the FBI called his cellphone and asked for a meeting after trying to contact him at his house. Jeremy then met with the FBI agents at a restaurant in Ybor City in December. He told Brandon Gray that 38 seconds into the interview the FBI attempted to recruit him to spy on the Oath Keepers.

The Gateway Pundit spoke with Jeremy Brown earlier this year. Jeremy was SAFE at the time, but laying low and keeping on the move until he says he has “a full grasp on any fallout that is sure to result.”



We will continue to follow Jeremy’s story.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

ARIZONA AUDIT FINDS 86,391 VOTERS HAVE NO IDENTITY MATCH

by Vianca Rodriguez September 29, 2021
https://rsbnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ballots-1.jpg

ARIZONA AUDIT FINDS 86,391 VOTERS HAVE NO IDENTITY MATCH
by Vianca Rodriguez September 29, 2021

Among several damning revelations from Friday’s hearing for the Maricopa County 2020 election audit results, is Cyber Ninjas’ finding that 86,391 votes in Arizona did not have an identity match.

The Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit Results Details report, conducted by Cyber Ninjas, cross-checked data from another commercial data source called Melissa Personator with the original “Final Voted File” (VM55) – the file that contained information of all of the individuals that voted in the 2020 presidential elections, The Gateway Pundit reported.

The report showed that more than 86,000 supposedly voting individuals were “found with no record in the database for either their name, or anyone with the same last name at the address in the VM55 file.”

Auditors could not access all original election ballots as requested via a subpoena submitted in January. Notwithstanding, the detailed report indicated that after utilizing Melissa Personator, a mix of both private and government data such as the U.S. Postal Service’s National Change of Address and the Social Security Administration’s Master Death List, tens of thousands of these voters have yet to be verified.

While it is possible to verify whether these people are actually “real,” the fact of the matter is that if it is this difficult to track someone’s identity down using a mix of state and federal database credentials as one typically does when they visit the doctor’s office, then there is a degree of legitimate suspicion.

Image captured from Cyber Ninjas’ “Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit Results Details” report.
An additional chart shows that of the 86,391 individuals lacking any records to prove their identities, more than 43 percent of them were registered as Democrats, 29.83 percent preferred “not to declare” their partisan status, and a 22.21 percent identified as Republican.

A mix of Democrat-affiliated voters with those that preferred not to declare either/or represent a total of 73.8 percent unknown voters, or 63,75 ballots.

If the Senate had subpoenaed successfully Maricopa County’s VRAS servers to determine if other issues besides hacking, such as non-citizen voter registrations, influenced the database, that “we might know a whole lot more,” according to Gateway Pundit.

Aside from confirmations last week showing that hundreds of thousands of voter discrepancies were discovered in the forensic audit of the Arizona 2020 election, more than 400,000 voter registration forms processed within the state also found no match with the Social Security Administration.

Recent discoveries and reports confirm what many have suspected all along, that foul play influenced the November 2020 election. What the state of Arizona will do with this newfound information is yet to be determined, but the attorney general appears to be taking steps to investigate.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Judge questions if Capitol rioters are being treated fairly

BY JORDAN WILLIAMS - 10/01/21 06:22 PM EDT

TheHill.com

Judge questions if Capitol rioters are being treated fairly

BY JORDAN WILLIAMS - 10/01/21 06:22 PM EDT 2,906

A Washington, D.C. federal judge during a hearing on Friday questioned whether alleged Capitol rioters are being treated fairly.

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, who was appointed by former President Trump, suggested that the rioters were being treated harsher than rioters in D.C. last year following the murder of George Floyd, CNN reported.

“The US Attorney's Office would have more credibility if it was even-handed in its concern about riots and mobs in the city," McFadden said, according to the news outlet.

McFadden reportedly made the comments during a sentencing hearing for accused Capitol rioter Danielle Doyle.

Doyle, who worked ticket sales for the Oklahoma City Thunder from 2010 to 2020, pleaded guilty in July to illegally demonstrating inside the Capitol. She was identified after her coworkers saw her in a video from the riot and reported her to the FBI.

Doyle was sentenced to two months’ probation, according to a database from the Department of Justice. She will also pay a $3,000 fine and $500 in restitution.

During the sentencing, McFadden said that Doyle was “acting like all those looters and rioters last year,” The Associated Press reported.

“That’s because looters and rioters decided the law did not apply to them," he continued.

Still, he said that Doyle’s behavior was a “national embarrassment,” and said that it “made us all feel less safe” like last year’s demonstrations, AP noted.

The comments are a departure from what other D.C. federal judges working cases related to the Capitol riot have said about the defendants. More than 600 people have been charged in connection with the riots, which saw supporters of Trump overwhelm the Capitol to delay the certification of the 2020 election.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton told defendant Anthony Mariotto that he’s “disgraced this country” after Mariotto pleaded guilty to parading in the Capitol.

“To see someone destroy, or try to destroy, the Capitol is very troubling to me,” Walton said.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Glenn Greenwald And Darren Beattie: New Evidence Of FBI Involvement In January 6 Capitol Riot

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date October 1, 2021

Video New Evidence of FBI Involvement in the 1/6 Protest -- With Darren Beattie, Who Broke the Story 1:24:26 min

Via "System Update" With Glenn Greenwald -- When former Trump speechwriter Darren Beattie reported in June that there was evidence suggesting FBI foreknowledge of the January 6 protest at the Capitol, if not active involvement, the corporate media mocked him and others who took it seriously for being deranged conspiracy theories. But now, the New York Times just reported that the FBI had at least one informant at the Capitol on that day. On the latest SYSTEM UPDATE, Glenn Greenwald speaks to Beattie about what do know now about involvement by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies. They also discuss whether the concept of "right" and "left" are changing radically.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
UPDATE: Court Denies Bail to Jeremy Brown Until Next Tuesday – Former Green Beret Was Arrested Thursday After He Earlier Refused FBI Request to Be Informant Plant at Jan. 6 Rallies
Spite arrest. Mr. Brown never entered the Capital Building. He was targeted for two reasons: He turned down an offer to inform AND he told others about his offer.

The Man doesn't want you to rat.

Dobbin
 
Top