POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

marsh

TB Fanatic

Arizona Democrat busted for voter fraud…
Posted by Kane on October 6, 2021 4:09 pm



SOURCE

YUMA, Ariz. – A Yuma County woman who was indicted last year for illegally returning four voted mail-in ballots that were not hers is facing three new felony charges. The Arizona attorney general’s office announced on yesterday that Guillermina Fuentes was indicted for voting another person’s early ballot in the August 2020 primary election. She was charged with conspiracy, forgery and a ballot abuse count.

Fuentes, 65, a Democrat, is a former mayor of the border city of San Luis. She serves as an elected board member of the Gadsden Elementary School District in San Luis.

The new indictment alleges that Fuentes obtained and voted another person’s early ballot and forged their signature.

She and another San Luis woman were indicted in December on one count each of ballot abuse for returning four voted early ballots that did not belong to her or a family member in the 2020 primary election.

The Legislature passed the ban on so-called ballot harvesting in 2016. It bars anyone but a caregiver or family member from returning a mail ballot and carries a presumptive sentence of a year in prison.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law in a ruling released in July.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Class-action lawsuit filed against Dominion… Alan Dershowitz is consulting on the case…
Posted by Kane on October 6, 2021 1:22 pm

1633562916930.png1633562995725.png

Lawsuit asserts that 3rd party vendor Dominion was operating as the government itself.

Dershowitz said in a brief interview that though he is not the lead attorney on this new class-action lawsuit, he described himself as an “adviser and consultant on the First Amendment issues of this case.”

“I consider this a part of the bigger-picture efforts, that includes my consulting on Mike Lindell and MyPillow’s cases. I believe the election was absolutely fair, I believe President Biden is the legitimately elected president. But I think the issue should be debated and should not be censored. I believe Dominion is trying to suppress free speech.”

Dershowitz also said he has had “no contact with Mr. Olsen at all,” and that “I disagree with him fundamentally on many of the substantive issues, but that’s always true with the First Amendment.”

In a complaint reviewed on Friday, eight poll challengers allege that cease and desist letters sent to them by Dominion as part of the company’s defamation lawsuit harmed and damaged the recipients. They allege that Dominion is violating the civil provision of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, engaged in a civil conspiracy, and deprived the litigants of their constitutional rights under the First Amendment and the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Read the lawsuit here…

1633563077981.png
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Update on Texas forensic audit…
Posted by Kane on October 6, 2021 2:37 pm

Rumble video on website 2:36 min

New legislation has been introduced in Texas to go forward with a full forensic audit of the 2020 election. One America’s Camryn Kinsey spoke with Texas Rep. Steve Toth (R) to learn more.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

UPDATE: Dr. Shiva Set to Testify Before House Oversight Committee on Arizona Forensic Audit Then Suddenly Removed from Roster Later This Afternoon

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 6, 2021 at 6:45pm

The House Committee on Oversight and Reform will hold a hearing Thursday to attack the Arizona audit and label it a “hyper-partisan” election subversion effort that “failed to find any fraud.”.

Of course, this is a lie.

The Arizona audit found hundreds of thousands of ballots cast that were possibly fake, and numerous law violations occurred before, during, and after election day.


The audit was a non-partisan mission to find out what really happened. Democrats, Republicans, and Independents volunteered for this historic full forensic audit.

Chairwoman of this committee, hyper-partisan, and radical leftist New York Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney fought vigorously to impeach President Trump again after he left office.

Now, Maricopa County Supervisors Jack Sellers and Bill Gates will speak at this hearing tomorrow in Washington DC.


The announcement of tomorrow’s hearing was presented in a press release slandering the Arizona audit and those involved, citing George Soros’s Brennan Center For Justice and other Soros News Propaganda for evidence.

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an expert in pattern recognition and computer science, will also be heard at this presentation to defend his findings and the work of the Arizona audit.

Oversight Committee to Hold Hearing on Partisan Arizona Election “Audit” and Threats to Democracy

Washington D.C. (October 6, 2021)— On Thursday, October 7, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. ET, The Committee on Oversight and Reform will hold a hearing to assess the election “audit” in Maricopa County, Arizona, conducted by Cyber Ninjas, Inc., and how this and similar audits undermine public confidence in elections and threaten our democracy.
In April 2021, the Arizona State Senate hired Cyber Ninjas to conduct an audit of the 2020 election results in Maricopa County, Arizona, even though the company had no prior federal election audit experience.
Since then, significant questions have been raised regarding the “dark money” organizations funding the audit, the impartiality of the company, and the mismanagement and insecure audit practices that have jeopardized the integrity of ballots and voting machines.
After six months and nearly seven million dollars spent, Cyber Ninjas’ final audit report failed to find any fraud, contrary to the conspiracy theories from the audit’s backers.
The hearing will examine how, despite failing to find any fraud, Cyber Ninjas’ audit has already inflicted grave damage to our democracy.
The audit has threatened the integrity of Arizona’s elections, inspired similar hyper-partisan audits in other states, and been used to justify dangerous state election subversion laws.
At the hearing the Committee will hear from two elected Republican officials from Maricopa County, Arizona, who refused to accept the “Big Lie” and are speaking out about the dangers of this partisan audit.
The Committee also invited the CEO of Cyber Ninjas, Doug Logan, to testify. Mr. Logan informed the Committee less than two days before the hearing that he was unwilling to testify, declining the opportunity to defend his company’s highly questionable, partisan audit under oath.

WHAT:

Full Committee hearing entitled, “Assessing the Election ‘Audit’ in Arizona and Threats to American Democracy”

WHEN:Thursday, October 7, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. ET

WHO:
Jack Sellers
Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, Arizona
Bill Gates
Vice Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, Arizona
David Becker
Executive Director and Founder, The Center for Election Innovation and Research
Gowri Ramachandran
Senior Counsel, The Brennan Center
Doug Logan (Invited)
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Consultant, Cyber Ninjas, Inc.
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai (Minority Witness)
WATCH:A livestream will be available on YouTube and the Committee on Oversight and Reform website.
The Senate has hundreds of witnesses and evidence of criminal wrongdoing to combat the lies and smears that will come out of tomorrow’s hearing.

This hearing will be live-streamed tomorrow at 10 a.m. ET.

All unredacted evidence from the Arizona audit has been turned over to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich.

It is now his job to save America.

Contact Attorney General Mark Brnovich now and tell him to do the right thing.

Contact Arizona AG Mark Brnovich

Update**
Dr. Shiva has been removed as a minority witness. Ken Bennett appears to be listed in his stead. We will have more to come as this story develops.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Oversight Committee to Hold Hearing on Partisan Arizona Election “Audit” and Threats to Democracy

Oct 5, 2021

Press Release

Washington D.C. (October 5, 2021)— On Thursday, October 7, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. ET, The Committee on Oversight and Reform will hold a hearing to assess the election “audit” in Maricopa County, Arizona, conducted by Cyber Ninjas, Inc., and how this and similar audits undermine public confidence in elections and threaten our democracy.

In April 2021, the Arizona State Senate hired Cyber Ninjas to conduct an audit of the 2020 election results in Maricopa County, Arizona, even though the company had no prior federal election audit experience. Since then, significant questions have been raised regarding the “dark money” organizations funding the audit, the impartiality of the company, and the mismanagement and insecure audit practices that have jeopardized the integrity of ballots and voting machines.

After six months and nearly seven million dollars spent, Cyber Ninjas’ final audit report failed to find any fraud, contrary to the conspiracy theories from the audit’s backers.

The hearing will examine how, despite failing to find any fraud, Cyber Ninjas’ audit has already inflicted grave damage to our democracy. The audit has threatened the integrity of Arizona’s elections, inspired similar hyper-partisan audits in other states, and been used to justify dangerous state election subversion laws.

WHAT:
Full Committee hearing entitled, “Assessing the Election ‘Audit’ in Arizona and Threats to American Democracy”
WHEN:Thursday, October 7, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. ET
WHO:
Jack Sellers
Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, Arizona

Bill Gates
Vice Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, Arizona

David Becker
Executive Director and Founder, The Center for Election Innovation and Research

Gowri Ramachandran
Senior Counsel, The Brennan Center

Doug Logan (Invited)
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Consultant, Cyber Ninjas, Inc.
WATCH:A livestream will be available on YouTube and the Committee on Oversight and Reform website.

MEDIA

Per the Office of the Attending Physician’s guidelines, and in consultation with the Architect of the Capitol, the Chief Administrative Officer, the Sergeant at Arms, and the Committee on House Administration, the hearing room has been reconfigured to provide for social distancing. In light of current guidance from CDC and OAP, media must comply with the Committee’s COVID guidelines, including by continuing to wear masks at all times, regardless of vaccination status.

Seating in the hearing room is extremely limited and as a result, credentialed media must RSVP to their respective Press Gallery no later than 5 p.m. ET October 6, 2021.

For more information, please contact the Gallery:

House Radio/TV Gallery: Ryan.Dahl@mail.house.gov 202-225-5214
House Periodical Gallery: periodical.press@mail.house.gov 202-225-2941
House Daily Press Gallery: dailypressgallery@mail.house.gov 202-225-3945
Photographer Gallery: Press_Photo@saa.senate.gov 202-224-6548

:bhd::kk2::kk2::fgr:
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

BREAKING – Dr. Shiva Responds To Maricopa County And Media Propagandists: “How Election Officials Use Media Proxies to Disseminate Misinformation & Disinformation to Avert Investigations of Election Malfeasance”

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 6, 2021 at 7:10pm

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT Ph.D. SMVS, SMME, SBEE, and the inventor of the email as we know it today, released a response to Maricopa County, exposing them and their media cronies at Arizona Mirror.

Dr. Shiva recently responded to a shady explanation from Maricopa County in regards to “Verified & Approved” stamps on the ballot envelopes that appeared to be doctored onto the images. Their poor answers only raise more questions about the procedures.

In a 67-page case study, Dr. Shiva puts Maricopa County Officials and their dark money propaganda outlets to shame.
How Election Officials Use Media Proxies to Disseminate Misinformation & Disinformation to Avert Investigations of Election Malfeasance
A Case Study of Maricopa County Election Officials Effectively Using a Local Blog Purporting “Independent Journalism” to Malign An Auditor Who Reported Anomalies in 2020 U.S. Election
AUTHOR
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PhD SMVS, SMME, SBEE 701 Concord Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138
This extensive report outlines Dr. Shiva’s impressive credentials as an expert in multiple fields, justifications for a full forensic audit, “the playbook” that was followed, Arizona Mirror’s absolute worst “independent journalism”, and he provides detailed responses to misinformation and disinformation pushed by Maricopa County through their Arizona Mirror proxy.

Shiva also denounces the County and the State media for their racist ad hominems and their refusal to look at his extraordinary qualifications as an exceptional computer software, and pattern recognition expert.

Dr. Shiva’s “two concrete next steps” are as follows
a. An open forum where a dialog takes place publicly between the Maricopa County officials and myself to review each anomaly and key finding documented in the Report; and,
b. An investigation on whether the 501 (c) not-for-profit named STATE NEWSROOM d.b.a Arizona Mirror, effectively serving as a proxy for Maricopa County election officials to execute a “hit job” on me – a member of the audit team of the 2020 Maricopa County, Arizona general election results -, was aimed to support one political candidate (Biden) over another (Trump).
Dr. Shiva’s investigation concluded,
Arizona Mirror: “Independent Journalism” At Its Worst
Maricopa County election officials chose to unleash their misinformation and disinformation, not in any formal manner such as responding to the anomalies and key findings, but rather effectively through a proxy, a unknown blog, which misrepresents itself as “independent journalism.”
He goes on to expose these “local and decentralized independent media blogs” for what they really are, centrally managed, dark money misinformation outlets, designed to control local narratives.

Key players including Mark Zuckerburg, founder of Arabella Advisors and Clinton appointee Eric Kessler, and Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund are behind this fake news propaganda operation.

All evidence has been turned over to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and the fate of our Country now lies in his hands.

Since receiving the evidence Mark Brnovich has placed a litigation hold notice on the County requesting the preservation of all elections evidence.

Contact Mark Brnocicvh now and tell him to protect our Constitution.

Contact Arizona AG Mark Brnovich

Read the full document below.
Scribd doc on website
1633575184149.png
Download this PDF
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The hearing will examine how, despite failing to find any fraud, Cyber Ninjas’ audit has already inflicted grave damage to our democracy. The audit has threatened the integrity of Arizona’s elections, inspired similar hyper-partisan audits in other states, and been used to justify dangerous state election subversion laws.
And here are your committee members.


Members, 117th Congress
MajorityMinority

25 Democrats of a most "progressive" sort (including the "Squad.)
20 Republicans of a most "medium" enthusiasm

One can imagine how this will turn out.

Dobbin
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

06 OCT AMERICA’S SURVIVAL SOON TO BE IN SCOTUS’ HANDS
Posted at 11:28h in A C W T Statements by ericgeorgatos

Sometime before Thanksgiving SCOTUS is going to be presented with an all-time, gut-check, character test. It will be a quo warranto petition, that effectively asks the Supreme Court to act with its enormous equitable powers to rectify the worst wrong ever done to this country: the brazen, criminal theft of the presidential election of November 2020.

Make no mistake. The evidence of the theft of the election has accumulated to overwhelming levels. The evidence does not show proof beyond a reasonable doubt; it shows proof beyond any doubt.

We will have no role in the preparation of the quo warranto filing. But we are deeply familiar with the work of Dr. Douglas Frank, and former Army Captain Seth Keshel; we also know what Liz Harris’ canvassing work uncovered in Arizona (to supplement the timid official audit).

There has never been any substantive rebuttal to what Dr. Frank is able to show about the rigged voter turnout, enabled and supercharged by drawing from inflated, phony voter registration rolls (also confirmed by Liz Harris and other canvassing efforts). And Dr. Frank’s ability to calculate the algorithms by which he can accurately predict voting results across every county of a state—based on analysis of the actual results in one county of the state—has been demonstrated across red and blue states. The inescapable conclusion: the entire election was rigged, in all 50 states.

Seth Keshel’s detailed presentation of statistical anomalies in all 50 states is also compelling, and it brings into focus a critical question SCOTUS needs to come to grips with. In an age of electronic voting, what exactly does and does not constitute ‘proof’ of election fraud?

Non-tech-savvy people stuck in a time warp who hold to a long-ago paradigm of paper ballots counted manually inevitably hold also to a notion that election fraud ‘proof’ can only consist of somebody in a backroom erasing ballots cast for candidate X and remarking them for candidate Y. Anything other than videotape of the backroom perpetrator erasing and remarking the ballots, or a signed confession, just isn’t ‘proof’.

This is infantile reasoning. Computers run on software code, and computers can be hacked. Voting machines are computers. There isn’t going to be videotape of a perpetrator changing individual ballots. But evidence of computer hacking abounds…and is proof. More specifically, election fraud ‘proof’ DOES consist of the 50-state statistical anomalies discovered and explained by Keshel; it most assuredly consists of the Dr. Frank’s discovery of algorithm-driven voting outcomes.

And all of Dr. Frank’s and Seth Keshel’s evidence is separate and apart from whatever Mike Lindell will add from his ‘pcap’ data capture. The extent to which the Deep State has sought to discredit and physically intimidate (and actually physically attack) Lindell ought to tell SCOTUS all SCOTUS needs to know about the proverbial ‘over the target’ nature of his evidence.

All the smirking in the world about the former crack addict/pillow salesman doesn’t have the slightest relevance to evaluating the probative value of his evidence.

John Roberts is constantly being accused of folding to pressure brought on him by the Deep State that seems to have dirt on him. We don’t know anything about that, but we do know that Roberts reportedly feared riots in the streets if SCOTUS agreed to hear any case questioning the 2020 election. In our view that was a grotesque and immoral misjudgment—the official suppression of truth is what assures unrest and, eventually, riots or worse.

But Roberts and the rest of the justices will now get a second chance to do the right thing. If they don’t see the results of the stolen election/an installed president/an agenda unsupported by even 5% of Americans, all around them:

  • an orchestrated lawless invasion of America at the southern border;
  • a transparent sell-out of American interests in Afghanistan to the Taliban, Russia and China (don’t be surprised if Taiwan has fallen before SCOTUS receives the quo warranto petition);
  • a US military hierarchy engaged in obvious and admitted treason;
  • the divisive poison of CRT unleashed and enforced with weaponized law enforcement determined to root out the non-problem artifice of ‘white supremacy’; and
  • a transparently senile occupant of the White House who constantly presents the uncomfortable question of who is actually running the country…
—then America is done.

There is almost no doubt that the social circles of SCOTUS justices are dominated by those holding the worldview that Donald Trump was the most evil, despicable human being ever to walk the face of the earth, much less to be elected to the U.S. Presidency. And so Roberts will probably continue to want to find a way to say the election fraud evidence is disturbing, but any legal or equitable action to ‘vitiate’ or nullify the 2020 election results is even more disturbing, and cannot be countenanced by the Supreme Court.

Such reasoning is vacuous; it is morally bankrupt. The proof of election fraud that changed the outcome IS deeply disturbing, as is the trail of evidence that suggests America hasn’t had honest elections for twenty years or more. But it is infinitely more disturbing, rattling, and likely riot-inducing to have the supreme institution of the judicial branch of the American Constitutional Republic…deny truth and its essential connection to justice.

There is no chance of maintaining stability in American society without SCOTUS demonstrating honesty and respect for the truth that the 2020 election was stolen, and must be rectified.

Yes, we know that sounds Pollyanna; and we have no delusions that the Supreme Court has engaged and will continue to engage in intellectual gymnastics from time to time to skirt or shade the truth in other contexts. But the stolen election of 2020—and what America as a society will do about it—is fundamental and foundational to the survival of the Republic.

The radical left firmly believes it can intimidate SCOTUS away from venturing into 2020 election fraud analysis by screaming that anything that leans toward invalidating Biden’s installation or re-instating Trump will lead to riots in the streets. The CCP and Soros and company would certainly be capable of paying for a few riots. But the real threat of violent division in America comes from a systemic institutional denial of truth. There can be no ‘justice’ in the American sense of that word except that which is derived from and based upon an acknowledgement of truth.

SCOTUS justices are bound by an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. They must step up to that oath. They must hear and consider all the evidence in the quo warranto petition. And they must acknowledge and rectify the wrong. If they do so, they won’t be hastening the demise of America; they will be giving America a chance—perhaps a last chance—to recover.
 

vestige

TB Fanatic

06 OCT AMERICA’S SURVIVAL SOON TO BE IN SCOTUS’ HANDS
Posted at 11:28h in A C W T Statements by ericgeorgatos

Sometime before Thanksgiving SCOTUS is going to be presented with an all-time, gut-check, character test. It will be a quo warranto petition, that effectively asks the Supreme Court to act with its enormous equitable powers to rectify the worst wrong ever done to this country: the brazen, criminal theft of the presidential election of November 2020.

Make no mistake. The evidence of the theft of the election has accumulated to overwhelming levels. The evidence does not show proof beyond a reasonable doubt; it shows proof beyond any doubt.

We will have no role in the preparation of the quo warranto filing. But we are deeply familiar with the work of Dr. Douglas Frank, and former Army Captain Seth Keshel; we also know what Liz Harris’ canvassing work uncovered in Arizona (to supplement the timid official audit).

There has never been any substantive rebuttal to what Dr. Frank is able to show about the rigged voter turnout, enabled and supercharged by drawing from inflated, phony voter registration rolls (also confirmed by Liz Harris and other canvassing efforts). And Dr. Frank’s ability to calculate the algorithms by which he can accurately predict voting results across every county of a state—based on analysis of the actual results in one county of the state—has been demonstrated across red and blue states. The inescapable conclusion: the entire election was rigged, in all 50 states.

Seth Keshel’s detailed presentation of statistical anomalies in all 50 states is also compelling, and it brings into focus a critical question SCOTUS needs to come to grips with. In an age of electronic voting, what exactly does and does not constitute ‘proof’ of election fraud?

Non-tech-savvy people stuck in a time warp who hold to a long-ago paradigm of paper ballots counted manually inevitably hold also to a notion that election fraud ‘proof’ can only consist of somebody in a backroom erasing ballots cast for candidate X and remarking them for candidate Y. Anything other than videotape of the backroom perpetrator erasing and remarking the ballots, or a signed confession, just isn’t ‘proof’.

This is infantile reasoning. Computers run on software code, and computers can be hacked. Voting machines are computers. There isn’t going to be videotape of a perpetrator changing individual ballots. But evidence of computer hacking abounds…and is proof. More specifically, election fraud ‘proof’ DOES consist of the 50-state statistical anomalies discovered and explained by Keshel; it most assuredly consists of the Dr. Frank’s discovery of algorithm-driven voting outcomes.

And all of Dr. Frank’s and Seth Keshel’s evidence is separate and apart from whatever Mike Lindell will add from his ‘pcap’ data capture. The extent to which the Deep State has sought to discredit and physically intimidate (and actually physically attack) Lindell ought to tell SCOTUS all SCOTUS needs to know about the proverbial ‘over the target’ nature of his evidence.

All the smirking in the world about the former crack addict/pillow salesman doesn’t have the slightest relevance to evaluating the probative value of his evidence.

John Roberts is constantly being accused of folding to pressure brought on him by the Deep State that seems to have dirt on him. We don’t know anything about that, but we do know that Roberts reportedly feared riots in the streets if SCOTUS agreed to hear any case questioning the 2020 election. In our view that was a grotesque and immoral misjudgment—the official suppression of truth is what assures unrest and, eventually, riots or worse.

But Roberts and the rest of the justices will now get a second chance to do the right thing. If they don’t see the results of the stolen election/an installed president/an agenda unsupported by even 5% of Americans, all around them:

  • an orchestrated lawless invasion of America at the southern border;
  • a transparent sell-out of American interests in Afghanistan to the Taliban, Russia and China (don’t be surprised if Taiwan has fallen before SCOTUS receives the quo warranto petition);
  • a US military hierarchy engaged in obvious and admitted treason;
  • the divisive poison of CRT unleashed and enforced with weaponized law enforcement determined to root out the non-problem artifice of ‘white supremacy’; and
  • a transparently senile occupant of the White House who constantly presents the uncomfortable question of who is actually running the country…
—then America is done.

There is almost no doubt that the social circles of SCOTUS justices are dominated by those holding the worldview that Donald Trump was the most evil, despicable human being ever to walk the face of the earth, much less to be elected to the U.S. Presidency. And so Roberts will probably continue to want to find a way to say the election fraud evidence is disturbing, but any legal or equitable action to ‘vitiate’ or nullify the 2020 election results is even more disturbing, and cannot be countenanced by the Supreme Court.

Such reasoning is vacuous; it is morally bankrupt. The proof of election fraud that changed the outcome IS deeply disturbing, as is the trail of evidence that suggests America hasn’t had honest elections for twenty years or more. But it is infinitely more disturbing, rattling, and likely riot-inducing to have the supreme institution of the judicial branch of the American Constitutional Republic…deny truth and its essential connection to justice.

There is no chance of maintaining stability in American society without SCOTUS demonstrating honesty and respect for the truth that the 2020 election was stolen, and must be rectified.

Yes, we know that sounds Pollyanna; and we have no delusions that the Supreme Court has engaged and will continue to engage in intellectual gymnastics from time to time to skirt or shade the truth in other contexts. But the stolen election of 2020—and what America as a society will do about it—is fundamental and foundational to the survival of the Republic.

The radical left firmly believes it can intimidate SCOTUS away from venturing into 2020 election fraud analysis by screaming that anything that leans toward invalidating Biden’s installation or re-instating Trump will lead to riots in the streets. The CCP and Soros and company would certainly be capable of paying for a few riots. But the real threat of violent division in America comes from a systemic institutional denial of truth. There can be no ‘justice’ in the American sense of that word except that which is derived from and based upon an acknowledgement of truth.

SCOTUS justices are bound by an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. They must step up to that oath. They must hear and consider all the evidence in the quo warranto petition. And they must acknowledge and rectify the wrong. If they do so, they won’t be hastening the demise of America; they will be giving America a chance—perhaps a last chance—to recover.
Ain't gonna happen
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Cyber Ninjas CEO Tells Congress to Fork Off and Joins Us Instead
ConservativeDaily Published October 6, 2021
Livestream begins: Oct 7, 11:00 am EDT

Rumble — Join us for an in-depth interview with Doug Logan, CEO of Cyber Ninjas. Doug decided to kick it with Conservative Daily instead of the weasels in Washington. Also, Congress is trash....there....we said it...
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

HERE WE GO: VA Dems Ask Northam to Waive Absentee Ballot Witness Signature Requirements As Governor’s Race Tightens – Citing Covid Dangers

By Cristina Laila
Published October 7, 2021 at 1:04pm

Democrats can’t win unless they cheat.

Virginia Democrats are now asking Governor Ralph Northam to waive absentee ballot witness signature requirements ahead of the gubernatorial race, citing Covid dangers.

The race between Democrat Terry McAuliffe and Republican Glenn Youngkin is close and the Democrats know they have a real chance of losing so they are once again using Covid as a vehicle to cheat just like they did in 2020.

Terry McAuliffe earlier this week said the quiet part out loud and admitted Joe Biden is unpopular during a zoom call.

“We gotta get Democrats out to vote. We are facing a lot of headwinds from Washington as you know. The president is unpopular today unfortunately here in Virginia, so we have got to follow through,” Terry McAuliffe said.

The governor’s race is tight so the Democrats are working to waive signature requirements.

InsideNoVa.com reported:
The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors is asking Gov. Ralph Northam to waive the witness signature requirement for absentee ballots cast by mail in this fall’s election.
The board voted 9-1 for the proposal by Chair Jeffrey McKay to send a letter to Northam, with Springfield District Supervisor Pat Herrity, the board’s only Republican, casting the only vote against the motion.
McKay said that waiving the witness signature requirement – as was done during the 2020 election – is necessary due to the continued threat of COVID-19. He said several Fairfax residents had shared concerns with him about obtaining witness signatures – arguing they could be exposed to COVID-19 in the process.
“No one should have their ballot rejected because they’re unwilling to risk their health and safety to vote,” McKay said during the meeting.
“We want to be a county that promotes voter participation and doesn’t punish people.”
Herrity said that waiving the requirement would be a “blow to election integrity.”
“Witness signatures are important as they provide another line of defense against voter fraud,” he added. “They’ve been deemed important enough by the General Assembly that they were reestablished outside the state of emergency.”
 
Last edited:

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Democrats can’t win unless they cheat.
Maybe they should hire as a contractor the Black woman who BRAGGED on Facebook about throwing the election - and later found on surveillance video of the Fulton County Arena doing exactly that.

Here is a challenge for my fellow stable mates here at TB2000 - try to find her name on the Internet.

She (and her daughter) have been effectively scrubbed. Look up "pulling ballots out from under tables" and you get 25 "fact checkers" that dispute the claim - even though seen BALD FACED in a video.

Sheesh.

Mind gush. Ruby Freeman. Pun on her name for sure.

Google her name and find a DOZEN Ruby Freeman's nationwide - not THE Ruby Freeman. And a couple of "Trump Claims" postings.

Dobbin
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

U.S. House hearing on Maricopa Election Audit… Jim Jordan perfection…
Posted by Kane on October 7, 2021 3:30 pm

View: https://youtu.be/0uD-aXzHOM4
6:34 min

Best highlight from today’s hearing on Maricopa Audit

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Full hearing on Arizona election audit
View: https://youtu.be/A3cDf5IKDpA
3:45:19 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Senate GOP releases post-election report on Trump-Justice Dept, contradicting findings from Dems

Among the findings in the GOP report was Trump did not exert improper influence on Justice Department

Updated: October 7, 2021 - 4:30pm

Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday released their review of President Trump's management of the Justice Department after the 2020 presidential election, concluding the former president's fears about election fraud were based on "legitimate concerns" – one day after Democrats who lead the chamber said their findings show Trump tried to install a loyalist atop the agency to investigate unfounded fraud claims.

The GOP's 140-page review, titled, "In their own words: A factual summary of testimony from senior Justice Department officials related to the events from December 14, 2020, to January 3, 2021" offers starkly different conclusions from those reached by chamber Democrats.

For example, the report found that Trump's concerns about widespread election fraud having tainted the outcome of the race were also based on "reports of crime."

The report, released by the committee's top Republican, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, also concluded that based on "available evidence" Trump did not use the department to try to "overturn the election."

"The transcripts of this investigation speak for themselves, and they paint a very different picture from the left's claims that the former president weaponized the Justice Department to alter the election results," Grassley said. "The available evidence shows that President Trump did what we’d expect a president to do on an issue of this importance: He listened to his senior advisers and followed their advice and recommendations."

The chamber Democrats' report also concluded Trump was considering replacing acting Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen with Justice Department official Jeffery Clark, the apparent loyalist who shared Trump's concerns about election fraud.

Among the other findings in the GOP report are that Trump:
  • Did not exert improper influence on the department
  • Had no impact on the department's election activities
  • Had concerns based upon allegations that Richard Pilger, then director of the department's Election Crimes Branch at the Criminal Division, undermined its election-related efforts.
  • Listened to advisers, including high-level Justice officials and White House counsel, and followed their recommendations
  • Twice rejected firing Rosen
The report also concluded that the Justice Department under President Joe Biden, who defeated Trump in last year's election, "interfered in the investigation and prevented a witness from answering questions related to the department's role in investigating election fraud allegations."
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Senate Judiciary Republican Report: Trump Did Not Weaponize DOJ After 2020 Election

28
US President Donald Trump delivers his acceptance speech for the Republican Party nomination for reelection during the final day of the Republican National Convention from the South Lawn of the White House on August 27, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via …
BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images
KRISTINA WONG7 Oct 202130

Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans released a report Thursday following the conclusion of the committee’s investigation to determine if former President Donald Trump had pressured the Department of Justice (DOJ) to look into allegations of 2020 presidential election fraud in hopes of overturning the election.

Its conclusions go against Democrat claims that Trump tried to “weaponize” the Justice Department and coerce it to overturn the results of the election and said according to available facts and evidence, Trump had listened to his senior DOJ and White House advisers and that he did not weaponize the DOJ for his personal or campaign purposes.

Ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said in a statement:
The transcripts of this investigation speak for themselves, and they paint a very different picture from the left’s claims that the former president weaponized the Justice Department to alter the election results. The available evidence shows that President Trump did what we’d expect a president to do on an issue of this importance: he listened to his senior advisors and followed their advice and recommendations. Contrast that with President Biden’s actions on Afghanistan. Biden ignored the advice of his generals and went ahead with a reckless and disaster-filled withdrawal.
The report said Trump’s concerns centered on what he perceived as an attack on the electoral system and his firm belief that the American people had been wronged by election fraud that undermined the sanctity of the 2020 election, and his approach was to ensure that the DOJ was aware of election fraud allegations and was doing its job to investigate them.

However, the report said that several times, Trump rejected further action, based on advice from senior advisers.

For example, Trump twice rejected sending Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Division Jeffrey Clark’s draft letter recommending some states with reported voter irregularities to hold a legislative session to choose different electors. He also twice rejected the notion of firing Jeffrey Rosen as acting attorney general.

It also said Trump did not fire any DOJ or FBI employee relating to his belief that more should have been done to investigate election fraud allegations.

Rather, Trump was focused on “legitimate complaints” and “reports of crimes,” the report said.

The report said:
President Trump was inundated with information about election fraud allegations and witnesses testified that they believe he was wrongly informed by some people within his circle. However, when presented with the opportunity to order DOJ to take certain actions that would have been against the advice and recommendations of his senior counsel, such as terminating Rosen and sending Clark’s letter, the President did not take those actions.
When presented with the opportunity to order DOJ to file a lawsuit against states with reported voter irregularities, Trump accepted the advice and recommendations of Rosen to not do so and did not challenge Rosen on his position, the report said.

The committee’s investigation was based on three interviews with former Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, former Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, and former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia Bjay Pak. Both Democrats and Republicans participated in the investigation and were present during interviews.

The report said witnesses testified that Trump did not expect the DOJ to overturn the election and that his questions about what the DOJ was doing to investigate election allegations were not unreasonable. Rosen had testified that any president has a responsibility to ensure the DOJ and agencies under his control are working on behalf of the American people.

The report also said Trump’s distrust of the DOJ and FBI most likely contributed to his concerns that the DOJ was not doing enough to investigate election allegations and that he was correct to be concerned, given evidence that the Public Integrity Section and Election Crimes Branch were passive in their approach to investigating election allegations and that Pak’s people were also “dragging their feet” in investigating matters.

The report said when committee staff asked questions regarding the types of cases and number of matters investigated relating to the 2020 election, the DOJ counsel repeatedly objected to the witnesses answering, “further frustrating congressional oversight and the American people’s right to know what their government did – or did not do – during the 2020 election.”
It concluded:
Based on the available facts and evidence, at every major decision point with respect to the scope of this investigation, the President met and listened to his most senior advisors and when they rendered the advice and recommendations that their job requires of them, President Trump followed their advice and recommendations.
Democrats had originally wanted to interview Clark, author of the draft letter and a figure central to Democrats’ claims of attempted election interference, but did not.

Senate Judiciary Committee Minority Report by Kristina Wong on Scribd
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

WHAT? Shady Maricopa County Official Claims They Had to Secretly Delete Information from Servers Under Subpoena to Make Room for the Next Election? (Video)

By Jim Hoft
Published October 7, 2021 at 5:44pm

The Arizona Forensic Audit Team announced during their summary report 10 days ago that they caught Maricopa Countydeleting subpoenaed files during their investigation.

Investigator Ben Cotton shared the IT results from the audit of the 2020 Maricopa County Election Results in Maricopa County. During his presentation, he noted that files were deleted by those involved in the election the day before the machines were to be handed over to the audit team.

This is very likely a criminal act.

Cotton noted that his team was able to identify the time stamps for when the files were deleted and altered by Maricopa County officials.
Ben Cotton: “We have captured screenshots of Maricopa County people at the keyboards during those time periods.”
The audience cheered in hearing the news!

At the 3:30 mark you can see Cotton’s remarks.

Rumble video on website 4:21 min

On Thursday Maricopa County officials testified before a US House committee hearing.

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) on Thursday grilled the crooked Maricopa County officials during a hearing on Capitol Hill.

Biggs asked the Maricopa Officials why they deleted 2020 election data from the Dominion election equipment after it was subpoenaed by the Arizona State Senate.
Chairman Jack Sellers: I just know that because there is limited space on these servers when you have to run another election then you have to make room for the additional election data.
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1446214623057756203
2:20 min

It doesn’t work that way, Jack.

Where is the Attorney General with the criminal investigation into these officials?
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Doug Logan NOW ADMITS Draft Report Published by The Gateway Pundit Was Authentic and Legitimate After Telling Gateway Pundit the ‘Decertification’ Language Was a Fake

By Jim Hoft
Published October 7, 2021 at 9:20pm

** The Gateway Pundit now has information that we were misled by Doug Logan from Cyber Ninjas and that our original reporting was correct on a watered down draft that included language to decertify the 2020 Arizona election.

* * * * * * * * * *

Here is our previous report from Sunday September 26th following the Friday Senate hearing—

The final audit reports from Cyber Ninjas work in Maricopa County Arizona were released after the Friday Senate hearing. They appear watered down.

What was removed?


These final reports can be located here:

1633661242224.png

Here is the final Maricopa County Forensic Election Executive Summary.

Scribd doc on website
1633660910868.png

Download this PDF

ExecutiveSummary VersionFin… by Jim Hoft

What’s notable is that one portion from the Executive Summary that was included in the draft released before Friday’s presentation, is not in the final Executive Summary:

Below is a draft of the final report provided by Byrne. This report shows:
In the 2020 presidential election, the margin of victory was only 10,457 votes, a small fraction of the 57,734 ballots with known issues. Again, this is almost 6 times the margin of victory in the Presidential race and is multiples of the margin of victory in other races. Based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable.


Below is the draft report obtained before the presentation.

ExecutiveSummary VersionFinal 092421 Draft by Jim Hoft on Scribd
Scribd doc on website
1633661136173.png
Download this PDF

In the final report, the statement calling for decertification was eliminated.

Then on Monday September 27 Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan called The Gateway Pundit—

Doug Logan specifically told us that the Cyber Ninja report that included language to “decertify the election” was a fake.

Doug told us someone must have used his letterhead to write out the report and that the “decertification” language was from a fake report.

1633661089664.png

Earlier this Week — We heard that the “decertification” report was indeed a draft. We were misled. We know that there are emails to prove this.



Then on Thursday Doug Logan joined Joe Oltmann for the Conservative Daily podcast.

During the podcast, Doug Logan admitted the so-called “fake report” was actually an earlier draft.

The Gateway Pundit was correct in our original reporting.

We attempted to call Doug Logan tonight for an explanation.

Rumble video on website 2:29:40 min
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Cyber Ninjas CEO Tells Congress to Fork Off and Joins Us Instead 2:29:40 min

Cyber Ninjas CEO Tells Congress to Fork Off and Joins Us Instead
ConservativeDaily Published October 7, 2021
Rumble — Join us for an in-depth interview with Doug Logan, CEO of Cyber Ninjas. Doug decided to kick it with Conservative Daily instead of the weasels in Washington. Also, Congress is trash....there....we said it...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Comment from Professor David Clements
Doug Logan is not willing to make a deteminative statement about decertification without being 100% sure.

He states this while knowing he can never arrive at that percentage due to massive destruction of evidence and noncompliance with subpoenas.

How convenient.

The bad guys destroy evidence.

The bad guys lie.

And it appears Doug Logan needs the bad guys to stop being bad before he can use his common sense.

Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal standard in a criminal case for a reason.

It's not beyond all doubt.

It's not beyond a shadow of a doubt.

The reasonable doubt standard simply requires that you have enough evidence before acting in the more grave decisions in life.

Before you cross the road, have you looked both ways? Have you determined where you should cross?

If you don't do either, you could get run over.

That's reasonable doubt at a common sense level.

It appears Doug Logan needs to take asphalt samples from the road, make sure the yellow stripes have been freshly painted, and has the latest meteorologist report to see if there is sufficient cloud cover before he would cross the road.

The beyond a reasonable doubt standard is set forth to protect the innocent from the government. "We the People" are the innocent victims of election fraud, and the Maricopa Board of Supervisors are the government, i.e. the State.

Stop protecting the government Doug.
 
Last edited:

marsh

TB Fanatic
Sidney Powell Joins Pete Santilli to Discuss Election Integrity, J6, & Medical Tyranny Oct. 5, 2021 21:14 min

Sidney Powell Joins Pete Santilli to Discuss Election Integrity, J6, & Medical Tyranny Oct. 5, 2021
Pete Santilli Show - Just The Interviews Published October 5, 2021
Rumble — Visit & Support http://defendingtherepublic.com
The Pete Santilli show EP2638 w/ special guest Sidney Powell to discuss election integrity, January 6th political prisoners, medical tyranny and more!

Website: Defending The Republic | Defending The Republic & Sidney Powell | Author of the Bestseller Licensed to Lie
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

FULTON COUNTY, GA RENEWS DOMINION VOTING MACHINE CONTRACT
October 7, 2021

1633662289113.png

Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gab TV, GETTR

Fulton County, GA County Commissioners approved Dominion Voting Systems for a new contract for the 2021 October special election.

Request approval of a statewide contract – Department of Registration and Elections, Secretary of State Contract #47800-SOS0000037, Master Solution Purchase and Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 with Dominion Voting, (Denver, CO), to provide poll technicians during Early Voting and Election Day for the 2021 General Municipal and Special Elections and Runoffs. Effective upon BOC approval. (APPROVED)

The video of the hearing is below.
6:43:41 min starts at 4:04:57 min

 

marsh

TB Fanatic

#AuditTheVoteNJ Process Serves 19 State Officials Requesting Forensic Audit of the 2020 Election

By Assistant Editor
Published October 8, 2021 at 7:15am

On October 7, a group in New Jersey, #AuditTheVoteNJ, have process served 108,000 notarized pages and 1140+/- affidavits from NJ Residents demanding a full forensic audit of the 2020 election.

In addition to serving Governor Murphy, 19 other NJ Elected Officials/Offices were served including: Lt. Gov. Sheila Oliver, AG Andrew Buck, Sec of State Hon. Tahesha Way, Chief Justice Rabner (& all 7 Justices), Senate Pres. Stephen Sweeney, Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, Senate Leader Thomas Kean Jr, Assembly Maj. Leader Louis Greenwald, Assembly Leader John Bramnick, Assembly, Speaker Craig Coughlin, Senate Pres Pro Tempore Teresa Ruiz, Assembly Pres Pro Tempore Gordon Johnson, Assembly Deputy Leader BettyLou DeCroce, Assembly Deputy Leader Ronald Dancer, Assembly Whip Edward Thomson III, Jr. US Senator Cory Booker, Sr. US Senator Bob Menendez, All Members of the NJ Senate & All Members of the General Assembly.

New Jersey now joins nine other states that have authorized a full forensic audit and 14 states that have also served their legislature demanding a full forensic audit of the 2020 general election.


Patriots gathered in the state capital in Trenton to share their concerns over the 2020 election and in the security of our elections in the future. Christina Oden Founder of #AuditTheVoteNJ shared with the crowd that gathered, “The affidavit is essentially the will of the people. The will of the people being that we, the people of the State of New Jersey, request of our elected officials to have a FULL forensic audit of the entire 2020 general election. That way we can see if there are any irregularities in the State of New Jersey and, if so, we can possibly put safeguards in place so that we can safeguard all of our future elections in the state of New Jersey. You know a great person, a great man, and an even better President once said “Trust, yet verify’. That is what we would like to do.”



“Back when I was younger, I always heard rumbles of little secret comments about the election system being questioned by older adults and the fact that your vote doesn’t really count. You hear mumbled whispers. And I always ignored them because I felt that they were just coming from people that well, they were too lazy to actually want to get up and go vote. So I ignored them. And later on, in the most recent elections, that rumble and that whisper has become a roar. A roar that we can no longer ignore. A roar that we need to get to the bottom of if we ever expect anyone in this state to take election and the election process seriously…we need to the bottom of what happened in our most recent election.”

“That way when I go vote, I can pay homage and respect to the women over 101 years ago that fought and many of them died down in Nashville, TN to give me the right to even vote. I owe it to those women to make sure that that right and my voice is never silenced….”




“ Each of these individuals that have been served have a total of 72 hours to respond to us. Within that 72 hours they need to either rebuttal to us or they need to give us a reason why they do not agree with doing the audit but at the end this is purely constitutional as per Article I Section 18 of the New Jersey Constitution it gives us full right and power ….at the end of the day, We the People of this country have complete and ultimate supreme power. We only disseminated a portion of our power to those 3 branches of government when we set up those 3 branches of government.”

“We need everyone to contact all 20 elected officials that were served and let them know that a forensic audit is the Will of the people and that they stand with the #AuditTheVoteNJ group who served them!”

“For more information and to follow the process as it happens please go to www.ChristinaOden.com the official Audit The Vote NJ website!”


Watch the full video here:

https://www.facebook.com/35999bd5-f47d-47db-b73d-85eab084e309 12:17 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Liberal Analyst Warns Democrats in Deep Trouble for Next Decade — And Explains Why They Lied about the “Peaceful Protesters” Burning and Pillaging America’s Cities

By Jim Hoft
Published October 8, 2021 at 2:00pm


Black Lives Matter-Antifa mobs caused over one billion dollars in damages in cities across America last year in 2020. In Minneapolis alone, Black Lives Matter mobs damaged or destroyed over 1,500 businesses or buildings.

Over 700 police officers were injured in the BLM riots — and that was back in June when the rioting was just getting going!

Black Lives Matter was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history
Democrats incited the Black Lives Matter mobs for months as they destroyed communities across the country and insisted they were “peaceful protesters.”

There was a reason for this.

Studies found that when protests are described as “peaceful” or “non-violent” they tend to increase Democratic vote.


So despite the fact that cities were burning and being destroyed the liberal media insisted the protests were “mostly peaceful.”

View: https://youtu.be/klVhCkhOTRQ
1:03 min

John Sexton at HotAir has more on this phenomenon.
On May 28, 2020, just three days after George Floyd was murdered by a police officer and the country was erupting with sometimes violent protests, progressive data analyst David Shor issued a warning about the efficacy of riots:

1633723239458.png
The research wasn’t his own. He was merely acting as a messenger. But at that particular moment in time, Shor became the enemy for a lot of outraged people. He was accused of being a racist. He apologized but the company that had employed him decided to side with the mob calling for his head and fired him.
Today, Ezra Klein published a piece about Shor’s work since then.
Getting canceled ultimately worked out really well for him. He gained a reputation as a data analyst who wasn’t willing to soften his message into something the client might want to hear. He founded his own company called Blue Rose Research where he’s been building an electoral simulation designed to predict what is likely to happen over the next decade in American politics. And once again, he has a message for Democrats that they are not going to like.
Democrats know their popularity is in the tank. They can only hope they are able to continue to steal elections in order to keep in power.

Hey, it worked for the Marxists
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

6 states are pushing Non-Citizen voting…
Posted by Kane on October 8, 2021 3:29 pm

Maryland California Illinois Vermont New York and Massachusetts

SOURCE — DAILY SIGNAL

Litigation in Vermont has highlighted the expanding trend of noncitizen voting, which two cities in that state recently allowed. Municipalities in California and Maryland similarly allow noncitizens to vote in local elections.

Other jurisdictions are considering doing so.

So far, these efforts to allow noncitizens to vote don’t apply to national elections, nor to state offices such as governor. For Democrats especially, though, this has been an emerging issue.

In July, The New York Times published an essay by Atossa Araxia Abrahamian, a senior editor at The Nation, under the headline “There Is No Good Reason You Should Have to Be a Citizen to Vote.”

Congress passed legislation in 1996 to prohibit noncitizens from voting in federal elections. State constitutions vary, although so far the idea has been entirely a local matter.

Here is a rundown of seven states where local jurisdictions either allow noncitizens to vote or are considering doing so, and another four that rejected the idea in the past three years.

Continue reading…
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Liz Harrington raises hell — Arizona broke the law, they stole it from Trump…
Posted by Kane on October 8, 2021 12:27 pm

1633727703243.png

Liz Harrington is keeping focus where it belongs, on Maricopa County.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1446157081556488195
3:41 min

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1446177332046204936
.46 min

1633727837803.png
1633727880770.png
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Democrat Party Files Lawsuit to Ensure They Can Steal All Future Pennsylvania Elections through Mail-in Voting

By Jim Hoft
Published October 8, 2021 at 6:15pm

The Democrat Party filed in court to demand mail-in voting laws that will ensure Democrats can steal all elections for the foreseeable future.

Governor Wolf signed emergency legislation into law without the approval of the state leglislature in 2020 for mail-in voting. Republicans were not able to overturn this in the courts.


So on Friday, the Democrats announced they will hold mail-in voting in the state from now on.

They pretend this is for voting rights.

We all know this is so they can steal all future elections.

And, of course, the Republican Party is nowhere to be found.

The DNC released this statement on Friday.
* * * * * * * * *
The DNC and PDP filed to intervene in defense of Pennsylvania law allowing all eligible voters to vote by mail

Today, the Democratic National Committee and Pennsylvania Democratic Party are taking action to intervene in litigation brought by 14 Pennsylvania Republican state legislators and a county election official, who claim that allowing all eligible Pennsylvanians to vote by mail without an excuse is impermissible under the Pennsylvania constitution — even though nearly all of them supported the law when it was enacted in 2019 with bipartisan support.

Issues like this one are of deep, direct, and urgent concern to President Joseph R. Biden and Vice President Kamala D. Harris, who have asked the Democratic National Committee to prioritize them.

Pennsylvania law allows all eligible voters to vote by mail without an excuse, just like 33 other states and the District of Columbia. In 2020, more than 2.6 million Pennsylvanians voted by mail. Eliminating the excuse requirement to vote by mail increases participation in our elections, including for working families and minority communities. “The DNC is taking action to ensure that all eligible Pennsylvania voters are given an equal opportunity to participate in our elections, and we stand ready to step in to defend the freedom to vote wherever partisan lawsuits are brought to attack voters’ ability to cast a ballot,” said DNC Chair Jaime Harrison.

“It is more important than ever that we keep up the fight for stronger participation in our democracy, and we are proud to stand with our partners to defend the voices of everyday Pennsylvanians,” said Pennsylvania Democratic Party Chairwoman Nancy Patton Mills. Additional Background on the DNC’s and PDP’s Legal Action:

In 2019, Governor Wolf signed Act 77 into law, a bipartisan compromise to modernize elections in the Commonwealth. Act 77 allows all Pennsylvanians to vote by mail, updates the Commonwealth’s voter registration law, and eliminates straight ticket voting. As Senate President Jake Corman said when the law was signed: “Compromise has given Pennsylvanians a modernized election code that preserves the integrity of the ballot box[,] and makes it easier for voters to choose the people who represent them.” Speaker of the House Bryan Cutler sounded a similar note: “This bill was not written to benefit one party or the other, or any one candidate or single election. It was developed over a multi-year period with input of people from different backgrounds and regions in Pennsylvania. It serves to preserve the integrity of every election and lift the voice of every voter.”
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

“Why Is It that These Partisan Leftist Lawyers Are Donating Their Time to the Defense?” Former Wisconsin Judge Michael Gableman Gives an Update on His Election Investigation

By Joe Hoft
Published October 8, 2021 at 4:42pm

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Judge Michael Gableman Gives an Update on His Election Investigation.

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Judge Michael Gableman was given the task of looking into the 2020 election in Wisconsin. Gableman is focusing on five locations where irregularities were noted related to interference from foreign players like Facebook. Gableman shared the following with radio host Dan O’Donnell:

(Gableman) What I did was serve subpoenas for records that the clerks and the cities are required to keep anyway. And I asked them to produce those documents. I demanded that they produce. This is not a court proceding. This is an exercise of the legislature’s constitutional right and their constitutional duty to see how laws are being impletmented. ..

(O’Donnell” …You’re alleging that Partrick Marley at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, is writing a story that he knows to be false about the ongoing investigation that you run.
(Gagleman) As is his pattern demostrated from the results that I’m meeting with the City Council of Green Bay on Tuesday…
About the Arizona audit:
(Gableman) For $6 million they did not get their money’s worth.
At the 17 minute mark:
(Gableman) Joseph Gerbils, who was Adolf Hitler’s head of propaganda in Nazi Germany, Gerbils said, ‘You give me control of a country’s media, I will turn any people into a heard of pigs.’…What they’re doing over at the Journal (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel), would make Joseph Gerbils blush.
At the 22 minute mark Gableman lays it all out:
…The people of this country who are the owners of this government. It’s time to step up to act not like customers but to act like the owners and the managers you really are. Ask yourself, why is it when the people’s representative goes up to Green Bay simply asking for the production of documents that they’re required by law to keep anyway, and the whole purpose of them keeping records is to demonstrate that the elections were honest. Why in response to that do I get Tony Evers (Wisconsin Governor) saying to a statewide audience that they have to lawyer up and then, why do I get a majority of the city council in Green Bay, not only lawyer up, but they lawyer up with a national Democrat, a national Democrat lawfirm with their state subsidiary lawfirm… Why is it that these partisan leftist lawyers are donating their time to the defense? Is it because that partisan leftist things occurred and influenced the election in Green Bay? These are the kinds of things our fellow citizens deserve to know.
View: https://youtu.be/LJ5p6TYO2bo
24:03 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic
Sidney Powell EXPLOSIVE: Its World War III – Patriots vs. Marxist Cabal – Ledger Report 1165 34:42 min

Sidney Powell EXPLOSIVE: Its World War III – Patriots vs. Marxist Cabal – Ledger Report 1165
The Ledger Report with Graham Ledger Published October 8, 2021

Rumble — 50 years from now, America will look back at today and realize that the Republic was at a tipping point where the Marxist Cabal consumed all avenues of the Constitution, leading to the new “Socialist America”, year 2071. Or, America will look back at a “silent majority” that rose up – peacefully and/or violently – to their re-claimed the God-given, birthright that was stolen by ideologues who are drunk on power and greed. This, ladies and gentlemen – whether we know it or not – is our World War III. It is happening real time. Graham Ledger speaks with Sidney Powell about fighting back to protect our precious right to vote, winning back our government, and standing-up for each and every American’s constitutional right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic


WATCH: Maricopa County admits they deleted election data from drives before giving it to auditors
OCT. 8, 2021 9:43 AM BY THE RIGHT SCOOP175 COMMENTS

Maricopa County admitted yesterday in a House oversight hearing of the Arizona audit that they deleted election files from the server hard drives and did not turn the data over to the auditors because it was ‘archived’:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1446157081556488195
3:41 min

The Maricopa County official in the hearing claimed he was ‘maintaining’ the files by deleting them from the hard drives because they were archived. He then claimed that the auditors never subpoenaed the ‘archive’ data and therefore they never turned it over to them.

One of the witnesses affiliated with the audit responded:
I find it frankly laughable to suggest that a county, in response to a subpoena, could say we will delete files from the hard drives and materials that we give to the auditors because we have those files archived on data that we did not give to the auditors, when the subpoena said turn over all the records related to the election.
When asked by Rep. Biggs if it’s standard practice to delete files from the server hard drives after an election, they wouldn’t say, but the hack Chairman of the Maricopa Board of Supervisors claimed that there is limited hard drive space and they have to do it when another election is coming.

Then Biggs asked the chairman if that’s the case, then why was there past election data present on the hard drives. The chairman looked absolutely dumbfounded and the other official rescued him by claiming that they didn’t have an answer for that.

That was a great question from Biggs because, in my opinion, it exposed the fact that these officials intentionally hid the data from the auditors when they wouldn’t normally delete election data from the hard drives.

Watch the video for more…
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Third Round Of Jan. 6 Subpoenas Target More Citizens Exercising Their Right To Protest

OCTOBER 8, 2021 By Tristan Justice

House Democrats with GOP Reps. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., and Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., unveiled the third round of subpoenas Thursday in their witch hunt over the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. The three new subpoenas target Stop the Steal LLC., along with Ali Alexander and Nathan Martin, who were both organizers of the protest.

“The rally on the Capitol grounds on January 6th, like the rally near the White House that day, immediately preceded the violent attack on the seat of our democracy,” wrote Committee Chair Bennie Thompson of Mississippi on the heel of the new trove of subpoenas, in a statement reported by Politico. “The Select Committee needs to understand all the details about the events that came before the attack, including who was involved in planning and funding them. We expect these witnesses to cooperate fully with our probe.”

Since its inception, however, the Select Committee on Jan. 6 has served as a show trial for Democrats in partnership with a pair of leading NeverTrump Republicans to seek retribution against political dissidents. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tapped Kinzinger and Cheney to serve on the probe after the Democrat barred Republicans Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, from the panel.

The committee’s first hearing in July featured a slate of Capitol police officers airing a public vendetta against the former president while lawmakers manufactured tears. One officer, Harry Dunn, had also previously defended the riots that engulfed the nation’s capital last year. The devastation from the two weeks of rioting in the immediate aftermath of George Floyd’s death alone cost an estimated 66 times more than the damage at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Eleven other organizers of the peaceful demonstration preceding the Capitol riot were also subpoenaed last week in the panel’s second round of subpoenas issued. Even leftists at the Brennan Center have criticized the deliberate targeting of private citizens exercising their First Amendment rights to peacefully assemble.

“At minimum, there needs to be some distinction between people who actually participated in the attack on the U.S. Capitol and those who were in D.C. lawfully exercising their right to protest,” said Elizabeth Goitein, the co-director of the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program. Goitein said she feared this is setting a “dangerous precedent.”

Lawmakers on the committee have yet to issue subpoenas for officials at the FBI, which The New York Times admitted last week planted informants in the crowd that overtook the Capitol. The probe’s first round of subpoenas targeted four former Trump aides.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers TWO WEEKS LATER: “I Am About To Go SCORCHED EARTH If I Don’t See Progress From The Arizona AG SOON.”

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 9, 2021 at 9:00am


Contact Arizona AG Mark Brnovich

It has now been two weeks since the Arizona audit presentation exposed massive amounts of fraud and elections law violations.

The unredacted, uncensored audit report and all evidence of criminality have been delivered to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich.

Since this delivery was made, Brnovich has issued a litigation hold notice on the County.

However, we have still seen no real action out of Attorney General Mark Brnovich.

Today, Wendy Rogers tweeted,
Rogers: Everyone is asking what is going on with the AG in Arizona. I have no idea. I will work on finding out but no news in this business is bad news.
OANN Correspondent Christina Bobb responded,
Bobb: He’s a coward and a flake. @GeneralBrnovichis betraying Arizona voters.
1633804172729.png

Later Rogers again tweeted about the AG,

Rogers: I am about to go scorched earth if I don’t see progress from the Arizona AG soon.

1633804119679.png


Mark Brnovich is running for U.S. Senate in 2022 but he will have absolutely no support from Arizona Republicans if he drops the ball.

1633804066904.png

Contact Mark Brnovich now, if you want to see a full criminal investigation.



Contact Arizona AG Mark Brnovich
 
Last edited:

marsh

TB Fanatic

TGP EXCLUSIVE – AZ Audit Volunteers Prevented from Attending DC Hearing on Their Audit Work – “I Knocked on Doors, I saw the Empty Lots with the 75 Names Attached to the One Address” (VIDEO)

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 9, 2021 at 8:15am


A group of concerned Arizona audit volunteers is in Washington D.C. for election integrity training, and they are extremely upset by Thursday’s U.S. Congressional hearing that attacked their efforts.

They attempted to attend the hearing on Thursday, but approval 24-hours in advance was required.

Audit volunteers recently released a must-watch video detailing the horrific ballot anomalies witnessed on the counting floor.

Last night, the volunteers created another great video in front of Capitol Hill, explaining why the lies told in the Congressional hearing were so despicable.

They chose to submit the video exclusively to The Gateway Pundit.
Heather: Hello, we are here at the Capitol. We are concerned citizens from Arizona. We heard yesterday, the hearing that our Board of Supervisors, and Ken Bennett, were in, and we are not happy at all. We took time away from our family to work at the audit. I saw hundreds of people taking their one week vacation, just to work at the audit. It’s not a joke. We the People call for an audit. Thankfully we had some Senators to help us but we called it, we wanted it. And it needed to be done because our elections are at risk. So for us to see all the lies that were going on yesterday at the hearing is unacceptable. We pay your salaries, Board of Supervisors. You’re there for us. You work for us. And you’re saying that we’re stupid and we and it’s a joke. And it’s unacceptable.
Patty: Hi, my name is Patty and I worked at the audit as well. I want to bring a couple points to the attention of the viewers. I am a former auditor, internal and external auditor, financial auditor, and I want to tell you one of the first things that we look at when we approach a company is we ask for their policies and procedures, because we will audit that. Secondly, we look for the management tone, and the management tone, in this case, would be the board of supervisors that are non compliant and they’re undermining, and they were adversarial. They have not ever been accommodating to the requests of the audit team. That is noncompliance and that leads to very unreliable sources from them, and we’ve not received the Splunk logs or any of the other information. More importantly, when they go publicly and start undermining the efforts of the taxpayers as Heather stated,we pay their salaries. They work for us and they need to be reminded of that. All of the politicians work for us. We the People called for the audit, we own the audit, it’s not the Senators’ audit, it’s our audit. And we sacrificed countless hours, countless hours to bring for the product that we stand behind, and the fact that we have people on our side of the aisle coming to Congress and spewing lies and spreading these rumors about cyber ninjas being illegit is, honestly, unbelievable, and it’s treason. Because We the People have called for the audit and we stand behind it and we will not stand for these political elites to feel they can undermine the American people. We will continue to stand behind the audit, and I want everyone out there to understand this.
I’ve run audit teams and the audit process was tight. There was a chain of custody presence, everyone took their job very seriously. There was check-ins and check-outs, we were temperature checked, we had COVID questionnaires we had to fill out, and all of that stuff because we have to abide by this law, but we did all of that because we wanted the audit to be above reproach. And we believe it is, it is above reproach and we wish that everyone would stop listening to the lies and start doing your own research. Just look in your own backyard.
I also did a lot of canvassing. I knocked on doors I saw the empty lots with the 75 names attached to the one address, countless times. So people need to wake up and they need to understand that this is all a lie, along with the COVID Lie to keep us down and to keep us divided. Because when we come together, which is what God wants us to do, then we win. It’s us against them, this is not going to stop until we start standing up and calling it for what it is. It’s a conspiracy against We the People, and we’ve had enough. Thank you.
Heather: And I just want to say that what we want is one day, one vote. Voter ID required, hand-count paper ballot, no mail-in except only in those certain circumstances, smaller precincts, no machines, results by 9 pm day of, period. Thats what we want. Because I’ll tell you what, when I went to the house, and there were 12 voters who voted from the one house, and the lady who answered the door said, “Well we moved in March and you know there’s just me and my husband, but I know we bought it from a family of five, with two adults and three children.” So literally there was 12 adult names that supposedly voted from that one house. So, there is something wrong, period. So for the board of supervisors to sit there and say that this audit is a joke is, like I said, absolutely unacceptable. And we are not moving forward to 2022 until 2020 is fixed, and we get our one day, one vote.
These auditors put serious work into this audit and they witnessed the law violations, evidence of malfeasance, and now the lies to cover it all up.
This hearing was a slap in the face.

We cannot move forward on 2022 until 2020 is fixed.

Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and demand a full criminal investigation into the 2020 election, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey, County Recorder Adrian Fontes, and County Recorder Stephen Richer.




Contact Arizona AG Mark Brnovich

Contact your Arizona State Legislators and demand a special session and decertification of the fraudulent 2020 election, HERE.

Watch below:

Rumble video on website 5:09 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

President Trump Promotes Upcoming Rally In Michigan on October 12th (Tuesday) on the Capitol Steps – Patriots Will Call for Michigan Forensic Audit (Updated)

By Joe Hoft
Published October 9, 2021 at 7:15am



President Trump on Friday promoted an upcoming rally in Lansing demanding a forensic audit in the state.

President Trump released a statement on Friday, October 8, 2021, that said:
Big Michigan Rally coming up on Oct. 12th, on the Capitol steps in Lansing, where Patriots will demand a Forensic Audit of the 2020 Presidential Election Scam. The Voter Fraud is beyond what anyone can believe. Anyone who cares about our Great Country should attend, because unless we look to the past and fix what happened, we won’t have a future or a Country. Matt DePerno, Rep. Steve Carra, and Kristina Karamo, who I have endorsed, will be there. Let’s Go, Michigan, don’t let us down!
We knew on election night that Michigan was stolen.

President Trump was up by tens of thousands of votes and then, by morning, his lead was stolen.

1633804913601.png

The numbers never added up.

1633804964830.png

The Gateway Pundit obtained video of a van pulling into the Detroit TCF Center where ballots were being counted. The van delivered 61 boxes of ballots to the center. Republican observers were locked out of the room where counting took place and AG Bill Barr prevented the FBI from investigating the crimes that took place there. It was a communist takeover and our justice system did not care.

They were part of the coup.

1633805023467.png

President Trump was extremely popular and Biden wasn’t. This was because President Trump’s results with the economy and foreign affairs totally outshined the Obama/Biden Administration’s.



Let’s hope the people of Michigan come out in the thousands to support the local patriots and the fight for free elections.

UPDATE– President Trump will not likely attend the rally but please plan on attending.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Federal Government Drops ALL Bogus Felony Charges Against Brandon Straka, #WalkAway Founder Pleads Guilty to Misdemeanors in Government Attempt to Break His Spirit

By Jim Hoft
Published October 9, 2021 at 7:30a



On Wednesday, October 6, Walk Away founder Brandon Straka pled guilty to a Class B Misdemeanor for the crime of disorderly conduct inside the US Capitol Grounds on January 6th.

Brandon did NOT go inside the US Capitol, did not participate in ANY violence, did not encourage violence, did not plan any violence, yet the corrupt and politicized federal government charged him with TWO felonies and a misdemeanor.

Brandon Straka was charged with crimes because Brandon Straka is EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE as a grassroots organizer!

Brandon’s story is amazing.
After being a dedicated liberal for years and years he started to do a bit of investigating and decided he could no longer support the viciousness and lies of the left.

Today over 300,000 Americans have joined Brandon and the #WalkAway movement and have not looked back!

And THAT’S WHY Brandon Straka was targeted by the corrupt federal prosecutors for attending the rally on January 6.

Brandon is effective. He leads leftists to the light. And once they Walk Away they DON’T walk back!

After Brandon’s hearing this week where he pleaded guilty to misdemeanor disorderly conduct, the demonic media portrayed this as a victory for their cause by proclaiming – Brandon Straka pled guilty for his ROLE “in the Insurrection.”

Brandon has spent 4 years advocating AGAINST political violence, and advocating for civility and respect in American politics.

Sentencing is December 17th.

Examples of Class B misdemeanors are graffiti, criminal trespass, and theft of property under $500.



The Gateway Pundit heard more about Brandon’s situation. Obviously, the leftist prosecutors put Brandon out of work for the past 10 months. Again, they did this because he is effective. How many other Republican operatives have flipped 300,000 Democrats to Trump in the last 4 years?

We also know from speaking to Brandon’s associates that he has not heard from the Trump campaign or GOP since this nightmare started in January. That is really tragic.

It should be clear at this point to ALL conservatives and populists that the current GOP is not up for the battle we are facing against godless Marxists.

Something needs to change.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Mass mail-in voting fraught with risks of fraud, review of sweeping 2020 experiment reveals
Universal mail-in voting has already become permanent in eight states.

Updated: October 8, 2021 - 11:25pm

Reviewing the results of the sudden, sweeping expansion of mail-in voting across the nation in the 2020 election, the America First Policy Institute warns that mass mail-in voting is fraught with risks of fraud and other election irregularities and urges the adoption of rules to make absentee voting secure.

Originally, mail-in ballots were reserved for "military members away from home and other individuals who were legitimately unable to vote in person on Election Day because of disability or travel," the populist conservative think tank recounts in an August study, "The Case Against Mass-Mail In Ballots.

However, since 2000, when Oregon became the first state to start using no-excuse absentee ballots, 29 other states and Washington, D.C. also adopted the practice.

"More states adopted these measures during the 2020 Election Cycle, and now only Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Indiana require an excuse to request a mail-in ballot," according to the AFPI.

"Shockingly," the report adds, "there is now a widespread effort to make no-excuse absentee ballot measures permanent across all elections."

Typically, absentee ballot rules require voters to request ballots and provide identification before they are sent out, AFPI explained. Then, after the clerk's office verifies a voter's identity, the voter will receive a ballot that can either be mailed in or returned in person at a designated polling location.

But with universal mail-in voting, all registered voters are sent absentee ballots regardless of whether they requested them.

Eight states — California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, and Washington — have made universal mail-in voting permanent.

When mass mail-in voting was implemented in many states during the COVID-19 pandemic last year, drop boxes were installed for voters to drop off their mail-in ballots, "oftentimes with no security or chain of custody to show their security," the report said.

"This removed any obstacles from ballots being illegally trafficked," the study found, linking to a Vision Times story on the lack of "chain of custody documents for thousands of mail absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes and transferred to counting locations" in Georgia.

At times, "the security of these ballots was so negligent that ballot drop boxes were sometimes vandalized and torched," the report said, citing an NBC 10 Boston news article on a ballot drop box being set on fire.

The 2020 election also provoked widespread complaints that the distribution of drop boxes was politically biased and unequal.

"In Democrat Delaware County, Pennsylvania, one drop box was placed every four square miles and for every 4,000 voters," reported The Amistad Project. In contrast, the election integrity watchdog found, "In the 59 counties carried by Trump in 2016, there was one drop box for every 1,100 square miles and every 72,000 voters."

Compounding the weaknesses of mass mail-in voting is the problem of inaccurate and outdated voter rolls, which, according to the AFPI, led in at least one situation to thousands of people receiving ballots from two states, as well as to some instances in which votes were cast in deceased people's names.

Citing the need for standards "to instill greater security in the process" of mail-in voting, the AFPI report offers a series of recommendations, including:
  • procedures that would guarantee "legal ballots are secured and counted quickly," ensuring only legal ballots are cast, and matching mailed ballots "to their envelopes after being opened to secure future authentication procedures and audits."
  • the adoption of ballot-tracking applications so ballots don't get lost in the mail, and allowing ballot applications to be sent only via First Class mail, "which allows state elections officials to use their Address Correction Services to match registrations with more updated address lists, thus providing additional security measures in ensuring only legally registered voters receive a ballot."
  • sending mail-in ballots only to voters who request them and have their identities verified.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Crazy and Corrupt Wisconsin Democrats Want to Audit Republican Audit of Wisconsin’s 2020 Election

By Joe Hoft
Published October 9, 2021 at 2:00pm



Wisconsin is attempting to audit the results of the 2020 election. The Democrats in the state don’t like it so they are attempting to find out what is going on and stop it.

On Election night 2020, more than 100,000 ballots were dropped for Joe Biden only in Wisconsin.

The massive vote dump on the early morning after the election came in the Milwaukee area. The individual overseeing the election there laughed about her misdeeds.

So the state is attempting to perform an audit of the 2020 Election results in the state and the Democrats are screaming to high heaven and lawyering up.

Now the Democrats are scared and attempting to stall all they can.
A Dane County circuit judge on Friday ordered Assembly Speaker Robin Vos to release records related to the Republican-led investigation into Wisconsin’s 2020 election.
The ruling came within hours of a public records lawsuit being filed and as the involvement in the investigation of Andrew Kloster, a Republican attorney and former member of President Donald Trump’s administration, continued to raise questions about the credibility of the inquiry, which is being led by retired state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman.
Is Speaker Vos smart enough to know that if the Democrats get away with this election steal they will do it every election? Does he know how hard they will fight against an audit and how serious he must be to overcome their attacks?
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

DeSantis, GOP leaders silent on calls for Florida election audits by Trump supporters
The effort in Florida is similar to requests in such states as Montana, South Carolina

By John Haughey
Updated: October 9, 2021 - 10:58pm

Florida Republicans are making attempts to get GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis to back an audit of the state's November 2020 election results similar to those in other states – but so far the governor and Trump ally has yet to publicly respond or back any such effort.

The state's Lake County Republican Party recently passed a resolution calling on Florida's GOP-dominated legislature to authorize a hand-recount of all 11.1 million ballots cast in Florida during last November's elections.

Then-President Trump easily won the state by over 371,000 votes, securing 51% of the ballot, a decisive win by battleground Florida standards.

But the country party thinks Trump's margin of victory would have been larger if not for fraud and is asking lawmakers to "improve election integrity."

The party says "many voters of all parties are angry at the findings of election fraud around the states" and that its effort is the first such to respond to "constant Republican concerns about election integrity in Florida."

One party member, state GOP Rep. Anthony Sabatini, the legislature's most ardent Trump fan, has recently taken steps to file a bill similar to the one he tried unsuccessfully to get passed last spring calling for an audit. If passed this time, the bill would result in lawmakers conducting such an audit in their 2022 legislative session.

However, Sabatini's bill doesn't call for a statewide audit – it targets only precincts in Florida counties with a population of 250,000 or more, which are generally urban areas controlled by Democrats,

His bill attempts to do what Texas GOP lawmakers pressured the state's elections office into doing, launching a "full forensic audit" of 2020 election results in four Democratic-dominated counties.

Sabatini maintains Democratic counties failed to flag duplicate online voter registrations, which he says is among the concerns of his constituents about Democrats cheating in elections.

"It's not about margin of victory," he said. "It's the fact is that people want total verification of the election results. They want an independent review of the votes."

Meanwhile, Florida Republican State Committee member Alfie Oakes, a Naples business owner and key GOP contributor, has pledged $100,000 to DeSantis' reelection campaign if the governor meets with him to review alleged evidence that Florida's 2020 election was fraud riddled.

Similar audit demands are circulating nationwide – in county committees and state legislatures including those in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania where Republicans on a Senate committee have launched their own "forensic investigation" into 2020 election results. It's part of what the committee calls a "comprehensive election integrity investigation."

In Montana, 86 of 98 state GOP lawmakers support creating a joint legislative committee to review 2020 election results because, they say, "many of our constituents ... reached out to us with questions about Montana election security."

In South Carolina, the Lexington County GOP Committee last week petitioned Gov. Henry McMaster to audit its 2020 election results. Although Trump won the county with 64% of the vote, the committee maintains voter rolls weren’t "sufficiently cleaned," resulting in illegal votes being cast and diluting Trump's margin of victory.

But thus far in Florida, other than brief comments by Secretary of State Laurel Lee, DeSantis and othrer Republican leaders in the state capital have yet to respond at least publicly to calls for an audit.

On Nov. 4, 2020, the day after the election, DeSantis, who like Trump appears to be considering a 2024 presidential bid, proclaimed Florida's 2020 election performance a national "model" and has said little since.

"People are actually looking at Florida and asking the question, 'Why can't the (other) states be more like Florida? Florida was able to handle 11 million ballots,' " he said. "The way Florida did it, I think, inspires confidence. I think that's how elections should be run."

In July, Lee dismissed a Sabatini-type bill.

"Florida’s election in 2020 was accurate, transparent and conducted in compliance with Florida law," Lee told the Orlando Sentinel. "Florida has already conducted both pre- and post-elections audits, and we are confident in the security and integrity of our 2020 election results. The post-election audit confirmed Florida’s 2020 election was secure and accurate."
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Capitol Police whistleblower delivers scathing rebuke to two of its senior leaders on Jan. 6

The whistleblower alleges, among multiple serious allegations, that former acting chief Yogananda Pittman lied to Congress about an intelligence report Capitol Police received before that day’s riot.

Police hold off supporters of Donald Trump who tried to break through a police barrier at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021.


The whistleblower accuses Sean Gallagher, the Capitol Police’s acting chief of uniformed operations, and Yogananda Pittman, its assistant chief of police for protective and intelligence operations, of deliberately choosing not to help officers under attack on Jan. 6. | Julio Cortez/AP Photo, file

By DANIEL LIPPMAN and BETSY WOODRUFF SWAN
10/08/2021 03:34 PM EDT

A former high-ranking Capitol Police official with knowledge of the department’s response to the Jan. 6 attack has sent congressional leaders a scathing letter accusing two of its senior leaders of mishandling intelligence and failing to respond properly during the riot.

The whistleblower, who requested anonymity for privacy reasons and left the force months after the attack, sent the 16-page letter late last month to the top members of both parties in the House and Senate. His missive makes scorching allegations against Sean Gallagher, the Capitol Police’s acting chief of uniformed operations, and Yogananda Pittman, its assistant chief of police for protective and intelligence operations — who also served as its former acting chief.

The whistleblower accuses Gallagher and Pittman of deliberately choosing not to help officers under attack on Jan. 6 and alleges that Pittman lied to Congress about an intelligence report Capitol Police received before that day’s riot. After a lengthy career in the department, the whistleblower was a senior official on duty on Jan. 6.

The whistleblower’s criticism went beyond Capitol Police leaders to Congress. Without naming specific lawmakers, his letter accuses congressional leaders of having “purposefully failed” to tell the truth about the department’s failures.

1633845262911.png

POLITICO obtained the letter detailing the allegations, which is circulating among Capitol Police officers, and is publishing portions of it here. To protect the whistleblower’s identity, POLITICO is not publishing the letter in full.

“The truth may be valued less than politics by many members of the congressional community to include those that have made decisions about the leadership of the USCP post January 6th, but I believe the truth still matters to real people and certainly the men and women of the U.S. Capitol Police,” the whistleblower wrote.

A spokesperson for the Capitol Police sent a statement in response to the letter that begins: A lot has changed since January 6. Although there is more work to do, many of the problems described in the letter have been addressed.”

The spokesperson added that the department “has implemented, and continues to implement, many of the critical recommendations called for in” a Senate inquiry into Jan. 6, a separate review conducted by retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré, and multiple probes by its own inspector general.

Capitol police relive horror at first Jan. 6 hearing, in 180 seconds

https://www.politico.com/5379495c-d2b8-46e5-81a7-0fc37f951d16 3:03 min

“The letter from the former employee echoes the thoughtful recommendations in those reports,” the Capitol Police spokesperson continued. “USCP leaders, under new Chief Tom Manger, are committed to learning from prior mistakes and protecting our brave officers, who fought valiantly on January 6, so we can continue to carry out the Department’s critical mission. The men and women of this Department are committed to that critical mission. Our goal is to work as a team, to move forward, and advance the work that keeps the U.S. Capitol and the people who work here safe.”

The letter was sent to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. The House Administration Committee’s Republican staff was also sent a copy.

The whistleblower accused Pittman of lying to Congress about a key intelligence report the department received in late December. That report noted that a blog called "thedonald.win" posted a map of the Capitol campus, and that commenters on the site called for protesters to carry guns and confront members of Congress on Jan. 6.

Pittman told congressional investigators in April that a cohort of senior officials in the department were also aware of that intelligence before the attack. The whistleblower claimed in his letter, however, that other officials did not receive the intelligence report, and that Pittman lied when she said they did.

1633845131441.png

“These officials were the only officials that had all the intelligence information for the 6th,” the whistleblower wrote, regarding Gallagher and Pittman.

“The single most important piece of intelligence information ... was never shared with any members of USCP leadership,” the whistleblower added, asking: “Why did they approve the operational plan for the 6th if they knew the intelligence?”

A senior law enforcement official said that other people in the department actually did have the intelligence, but that it clearly should have been distributed more widely. The Capitol Police spokesperson disputed the allegation that Pittman lied to Congress and noted that the department has changed its internal and external intelligence-sharing practices because of the attack.

However, the report in question wasn’t the only key piece of intelligence that didn’t reach the right people in the department, according to the whistleblower.

Gallagher and Pittman also had information showing groups that received permits to hold events surrounding the Capitol on Jan. 6 were all front operations for Stop the Steal, the whistleblower wrote.

USCP Acting Assistant Chief for Uniformed Operations Sean Gallagher speaks at a news conference.

USCP Acting Assistant Chief for Uniformed Operations Sean Gallagher speaks at a news conference to discuss the law enforcement’s preparations ahead of the Justice for J6 Rally near the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 17, 2021 in Washington, D.C. | Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Stop the Steal was a movement promoting the conspiracy theory that nefarious forces stole the election from Trump. The movement’s organizers promoted a rally on the National Mall that preceded the attack on the Capitol.

That was “game changing information,” the whistleblower added, but operational commanders — meaning, the law enforcement officers in the field supervising police activity — never learned about it.

1633845071515.png

In the whistleblower’s view, Gallagher and Pittman had all the intelligence needed to justify demanding reinforcements from the National Guard, closing the doors to the Capitol and using tougher but less-than-lethal weapons on the morning of Jan. 6. But they didn’t share that intelligence with the right people, the whistleblower wrote, and instead approved a woefully inadequate security plan.

The whistleblower also said he spent hours during the attack in the Capitol Police’s Command Center with Pittman and Gallagher, claiming that they did little to stop the violence. The whistleblower's presence in the command center on Jan. 6 was confirmed by two other law enforcement officials and a third person who was there during the attack.

Those three people gave different accounts of how long the whistleblower was there. One of the people said he was there for six hours, another said he was there for “several” hours and a third said he was there for less than two hours.

“What I observed was them mostly sitting there, blankly looking at the TV screens showing real time footage of officers and officials fighting for the Congress and their lives,” the whistleblower wrote.

“It is my allegation that these two with intent and malice opted to not try and assist the officers and officials, blame others for the failures, and chose to try and use this event for their own personal promotions,” he added. “This was done not after the even[t] but while officers and officials were still fighting the demonstrators.”

1633845012103.png

They watched “mostly with their hands in their laps,” he added, and “did not try to help or assist as officers and officials were literally fighting for each other, their lives and the Congress.”

The two law enforcement official who confirmed Pittman and Gallagher's presence in the command center disputed the claim that they passively watched the attacks. Those officials said Gallagher focused on bringing in support from the National Guard and law enforcement partners, and that Pittman focused on the evacuation and protection of members of Congress and the vice president.

The whistleblower, however, wrote that officials and officers have resigned from the department en masse because Pittman and Gallagher haven’t been held accountable for what happened that day.

“This concerted effort to protect the two members of the Department without question the most responsible for the tragic events of January 6th is repulsive,” the whistleblower wrote.

And the whistleblower lambasted congressional leadership for letting Gallagher and Pittman maintain their senior roles in the police department even as a new chief took over at the Capitol Police.

t is immensely embarrassing to the congressional leadership and staff that they selected the two individuals most responsible for the 6th to lead the Department after the 6th,” he wrote in his conclusion. “Especially since some entity selected them without any investigation. To hold them accountable would require this same group to admit they were wrong.”
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Trump blasts McConnell, doubles down on election claims at Iowa rally
People wait for a rally with former President Donald Trump to begin at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines, Iowa., Saturday, Oct. 9, 2021. (AP Photo/Thomas Beaumont)
People wait for a rally with former President Donald Trump to begin at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines, Iowa., Saturday, Oct. 9, 2021. (AP Photo/Thomas Beaumont)

By Joseph Clark - The Washington Times - Saturday, October 9, 2021

Former President Donald Trump renewed his attacks on Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell Saturday night, calling the Kentucky Republican out for failing to challenge the 2020 presidential election.

Mr. Trump also called for Mr. McConnell’s ouster Thursday after he and 10 other Senate Republicans voted to help Democrats increase the nation’s debt ceiling.

“Mitch McConnell should have challenged that election,” Mr. Trump said during a campaign-style rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds Saturday night. “Because even back then we had plenty of material to challenge that election.”

“[Senate Majority Leader Charles] Schumer would have challenged the election.

Mitch McConnell did not have the courage to challenge the election,” Mr. Trump said.
During his address, Mr. Trump dug in on President Biden’s stalled $3.5 trillion spending bill, railed against the administration on immigration, and took more shots on the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. But his claims that the 2020 election was rigged in favor of Mr. Biden was a prominent theme throughout.

“All of these calamities are the direct, predictable and disastrous consequences of a totally corrupt election,” Mr. Trump said of the Biden presidency. “It’s all because of the corrupt election. They rigged the election. And now based on the rigged election, they’re destroying our country.”

“Remember, this is not about me being robbed for the election, this is about the American people having their country taken away from them. That’s what it’s really about,” he said.

But his remarks also signal further divide in the Republican Party over the election claims.

Mr. Trump‘s stop in Hawkeye State, a proving ground for any presidential contender as the first-in-the-nation caucus state, further adds to the speculation that the former president will run again in 2024.

The former president has dropped several hints that he intends to run.

In June, Mr. Trump told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that he had made up his mind about 2024, but would not say whether he planned to run or not.

Mr. Trump told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly in August “I think a lot of people are going to be very happy,” when asked about his plans for 2024.

The former president continued to hint at a White House bid while visiting New York City on Sept. 11.

Mr. Trump’s rally comes on the heels of a September Des Moines Register/MediaCom poll showing 53% of Iowans have a favorable view of the former president, topping his highest numbers among Iowans during his presidency.

Among Iowa Republicans, Mr. Trump enjoys a 91% favorability rating according to the same poll. He is viewed unfavorably by just 7% of Republicans in the state.

The same poll showed that Mr. Biden’s approval among Iowans fell 12 percentage points, while his disapproval jumped 10 points since June. Just 31% of Iowans approve of Mr. Biden’s handling of the presidency.

Mr. Trump carried Iowa in both 2016 and 2020.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem Speaks At Trump Rally In Des Moines: “34,000 Or 35,000 Fictitious Voters – We Believe We Found Them.”

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 9, 2021 at 11:11pm


Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem just spoke at President Trump’s Save America rally in De Moines, Iowa.


He spoke about President Trump’s ‘Drain The Swamp’ agenda, the Arizona audit, and the disgusting attempts by the left to suppress the American people.
Finchem: He was able to pull the curtain back and reveal the rot, and the self-serving, and the corruption in Washington DC. Your consent to be governed goes hand in hand with your right to examine, audit, and question your government. But the left would tell you “Oh, wait a minute. Audits undermine your confidence in the election.”
Seriously? No, what undermines is the fact that we have hundreds of thousands of fictitious voters in the system. We have ballots and nobody knows where they came from. So with all the evidence, I think the Lord’s got a message here with this whole audit thing, don’t you? With all the evidence of incompetence and criminality, that’s been presented to the Arizona Senate, to Congress and now to the Arizona Attorney General, the Maricopa County 2020 election, cannot be allowed to stand. It must be decertified. And set aside.
There’s more. I love it when I say that. But wait there’s more. If you’ll go to votefinchem.com, there’s a button at the top that calls for an audit of Pima County. That is the second most populous county in the state of Arizona, where we had a whistleblower who sent an email not just to the DOJ but to every single legislator saying, there’s 34,000 or 35,000 fictitious voters, and they’ve been inserted in system, and we’re going to never find them. Well, we believe we found them.
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1446964089616470021
2:07 min

Audits that find fraud do undermine confidence in the election.

The Gateway Pundit reported that Mark Finchem has a petition to audit Pima County and he needs at least 500 thousand signatures.

Sign the nationwide petition HERE!

Finchem hints that they found fraudulent ballots that triple or quadruple the state’s margin of victory in Pima County

All evidence from the Arizona audit hearing has been turned over to Attorney General Mark Brnovich and he needs to open a criminal investigation into this evidence of criminality and criminal incompetence.

All other evidence from additional sources has also been turned over to the Attorney General.

It has been two weeks since he received the evidence and we have seen no action.

Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich now and demand a full criminal investigation.



Contact Arizona AG Mark Brnovich
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

In Case You Were Wondering – It’s Almost Certain Now that Those Were Federal Agents Planted at the “Justice for J6” Rally

By Jim Hoft
Published October 10, 2021 at 12:44pm


In October 2020, the FBI announced during a press conference that it thwarted a plot by a so-called “right-wing militia” to kidnap and kill Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and overthrow the state government.

We now know the FBI used at least 12 informants out of 16 defendants) in the Michigan Whitmer kidnapping case and hatched the plot. And we know that the FBI told at least one informant to lie to frame the defendants in the case.

The FBI informants-agents actually helped hatch the kidnapping plot which means there would be no conspiracy case without the FBI. The FBI even paid for it.

One FBI informant organized all the meetings early on and paid for hotel rooms and food to entice the patsies.

It is illegal for FBI informants to hatch plots and encourage violence — but the FBI is a lawless organization today under Director Chris Wray.

On January 6th we also know the FBI was running informants and operatives in the crowd that day.


And then in early Septembert intelligence agencies warned that “extremists” may attend the September 18th rally in support of the Jan. 6 political prisoners in Washington DC.

And then on September 18th, sure enough, there were more reporters and “undercover” agents in Ray-Bans at the J-6 Rally in Washington DC than attendees.

They stuck out like a sore thumb — with Ray-Bans.



And now, after three weeks we know these men with their GQ looks were indeed federal operatives and likely FBI agents.

According to a federal agent acquaintance…

The fact that none of the men have been identified and that federal agencies have not spoken out about their famous photo guarantees that they are indeed federal agents.

Thanks to the alert photographer who was able to catch this now-famous image of the federal government’s recent operation targeting Trump supporters and those who value the rule of law.
 
Top