GUNS/RLTD MONTANA DEFIES FEDS OVER RESTRICTIVE GUN LAWS

dberszerker

Veteran Member
http://www.norcalblogs.com/post_scripts/2009/05/montana_defies_feds_-_thr.html





May 5, 2009 MONTANA DEFIES FEDS OVER RESTRICTIVE GUN LAWS
Montana Governor Signs New Gun Law

Executive Summary - The USA state of Montana has signed into power a revolutionary gun law. I mean REVOLUTIONARY.

The State of Montana has defied the federal government and their gun laws. This will prompt a showdown between the federal government and the State of Montana. The federal government fears citizens owning guns. They try to curtail what types of guns they can own. The gun control laws all have one common goal - confiscation of privately owned firearms.

Montana has gone beyond drawing a line in the sand. They have challenged the Federal Government. The fed now either takes them on and risks them saying the federal agents have no right to violate their state gun laws and arrest the federal agents that try to enforce the federal firearms acts. This will be a world-class event to watch. Montana could go to voting for secession from the union, which is really throwing the gauntlet in Obamas face. If the federal government does nothing they lose face.



Important Points - If guns and ammunition are manufactured inside the State of Montana for sale and use inside that state then the federal firearms laws have no applicability since the federal government only has the power to control commerce across state lines. Montana has the law on their side. But, since when did the USA start following their own laws especially the constitution of the USA, the very document that empowers the USA?

Silencers made in Montana and sold in Montana would be fully legal and not registered. As a note, silencers were first used before the 007 movies as a device to enable one to hunt without disturbing neighbors and scaring game. They were also useful as devices to control noise when practicing so as to not disturb the neighbors.

Silencers work best with a bolt-action rifle. There is a long barrel and the chamber is closed tight so as to direct all the gases though the silencer at the tip of the barrel. Semi-auto pistols and revolvers do not really muffle the sound very well except on the silver screen. The revolvers bleed gas out with the sound all over the place. The semi-auto pistols bleed the gases out when the slide recoils back.

Silencers are maybe nice for snipers picking off enemy soldiers even though they reduce velocity but not very practical for hit men shooting pistols in crowded places. Silencers were useful tools for gun enthusiasts and hunters.

There would be no firearm registration, serial numbers, criminal records check, waiting periods or paperwork required. So in a short period of time there would be millions and millions of unregistered untraceable guns in Montana. Way to go Montana.

Discussion - Let us see what Obama does. If he hits Montana hard they will probably vote to secede from the USA. The governor of Texas has already been refusing Federal money because he does not want to agree to the conditions that go with it and he has been saying secession is a right they have as sort of a threat. Things are no longer the same with the USA. Do not be deceived by Obama acting as if all is the same, it is not.

Text of the New Law

HOUSE BILL NO. 246

INTRODUCED BY J. BONIEK, BENNETT, BUTCHER, CURTISS, RANDALL, WARBURTON
AN ACT EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A FIREARM, A FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN MONTANA; AND PROVIDING AN APPLICABILITY DATE.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:

Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 6] may be cited as the "Montana Firearms Freedom Act".

Section 2. Legislative declarations of authority. The legislature declares that the authority for [sections 1 through 6] is the following:

(1) The 10th amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the constitution and reserves to the state and people of Montana certain powers as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those powers is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the constitution and reserves to the people of Montana certain rights, as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(3) The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the 9th and 10th amendments to the United States constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition.

(4) The second amendment to the United States constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, and the guaranty of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.(5) Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution clearly secures to Montana citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual Montana citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1889 Montana constitution, which was approved by congress and the people of Montana, and the right exists, as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

Section 3. Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 6], the following definitions apply:
(1) "Borders of Montana" means the boundaries of Montana described in Article I, section 1, of the 1889 Montana constitution.

(2) "Firearms accessories" means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.

(3) "Generic and insignificant parts" includes but is not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins.

(4) "Manufactured" means that a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition has been created from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.

Section 4. Prohibitions. A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Montana from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Montana from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Montana.

Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:

(1) A firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;
(2) A firearm that has a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;
(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or
(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.

Section 6. Marketing of firearms. A firearm manufactured or sold in Montana under [sections 1 through 6] must have the words "Made in Montana" clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.

Section 7. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 6] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 30, and the provisions of Title 30 apply to [sections 1 through 6].

Section 8. Applicability. [This act] applies to firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured, as defined in [section 3], and retained in Montana after October 1, 2009.


Posted by Post Scripts at May 5, 2009 10:30 AM

Comments
 

mt4design

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Awesome.

From here, where this nation goes is interesting.

Ironic that we have the first "black" man as president tearing apart the very nation Lincoln tried so hard to keep together.

Mike
 

dberszerker

Veteran Member
Awesome.

From here, where this nation goes is interesting.

Ironic that we have the first "black" man as president tearing apart the very nation Lincoln tried so hard to keep together.

Mike





If Alan Keyes had beat Hussein for his Senatorial bid, I would have voted for him in a heart beat as Potus. Back on topic, if this thing catches on in Montana, Texas will be close behind. Hussien good for gun rights? Who'da thunk it?
 
I

hadn't seen yet locally that the govenor has signed it into law.

If he has, good for him. And good for the People's and Legislators of this great State.

THIS STATE is the most pro gun I have ever had the good fortune to pass through or live in. Almost EVERYONE is pro-gun, including almost every woman/girl/old lady I have talked to or listened to.

ds
 

mt4design

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I may want a couple of acres out your way soon

You and me both. I've always wanted to live in Montana.

KUDOS to the great state of Montana for reminding the nation of the independent spirit that built it in the first place.

Mike
 

BoatGuy

Inactive
If they'll send that bill down to Texas, I'm hoping they would pass it, too. Otherwise, I guess we'll just have to figger out how to fit a whole bunch of Texans into Montana.
 

Lone Eagle Woman

Veteran Member
Congrats to Montana!!! I live here in Wyoming and it is soooo good to have
Montana to the North, Idaho to the West, and the Dakotas to the East.
If they do secede then know that Idaho and Wyoming will probably not be far
behind.
 

Cardinal

Chickministrator
_______________
Awesome.

From here, where this nation goes is interesting.

Ironic that we have the first "black" man as president tearing apart the very nation Lincoln tried so hard to keep together.

Mike

If he gets his compulsory service acts passed, he will, ironically, be the (first black) President who brings back slavery.
 
Our current governor as quoted:

“It doesn't cost us any money and I like guns,” Schweitzer said after signing the bill.

“I like big guns, I like little guns, I like pistols, I like rifles, and I would like to buy a gun that's made in Montana,” Schweitzer said.

Tom - In Montana
 

Texas Writer

Veteran Member
If they'll send that bill down to Texas, I'm hoping they would pass it, too. Otherwise, I guess we'll just have to figger out how to fit a whole bunch of Texans into Montana.

Actually, Rep. Joe Barton of Tyler has either already introduced a similar bill, or plans to do so.
 

denfoote

Inactive
Montana is gonna need to muster a Militia real soon to fight off the hoards of Obamagoons that are already on their way!!
 

xtreme_right

Veteran Member
I heard Berman on a local talk show this morning (here in TX) talking about a bill here in Texas for the same thing. He said he saw the need for this and looked to see if other states had done anything like it. He mentioned Montana.

xr
 

Rex Jackson

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Good for them but beware...of some 'mystery disease' outbreak in Montana now...

The Whitehouse is full of a bunch of spoiled bitches and freaks. They have no say IN ANYTHING except nations security and seeing they have screwed everything else up they've done in the last 25years, including encouraging a 670trillion dollar global deficit, they will probably loose that power as well.

THE PEOPLE have the power. They STATE enforces that power. Washington DC is nothing but a STATE and it can only control what happens in ITS OWN state.
 

Mr. Mason

Membership Revoked
Watch the governor suddenely change his tune soon...

Commander Zero will make him an offer he can't refuse... a couple hundred million in a Swiss Bank Account, etc. or if all else fails they'll just plant some child porn on his computer, etc.
 
well

come on up! I plan on boarding up with others when the real fun starts. Just make sure you LIKE people and want to help others, and not just those that fit your own personal political or religious beliefs.

Montanians fit every spectrum, and there is a lot of dross and trash up here too. But this is the only place left that I found that resembles the US I grew up in and was taught to believe in.


ds


ps. Cali uber liberals NOT welcome, lol. When asked where I come from I have learned to say Minnesota first NOT Cali.
 

Infoscout

The Dude Abides
If Montana secedes, I will be there as soon as I can!! I want to be from Montana, not from the "Cali" of the South=North Carolina!
 

ARMY RANGER

Inactive
Here in Soviet New York there is a movement on now to start a third party.They want to rewrite the state constitution and physically remove all the current Politicians from office,then start with all fresh ones that follow the Constitution.Rock on, this is what we really need.:spns:
 

TECH32

Veteran Member
Important Points - If guns and ammunition are manufactured inside the State of Montana for sale and use inside that state then the federal firearms laws have no applicability since the federal government only has the power to control commerce across state lines.

Sorry, but if a big and powerful state like California can't convice the SCOTUS that marijuana grown inside the state, soley for mdeical consumption within the state, falls outside of the interstate commerce clause, then a small state like Montana doesn't have a chance....
 

Dex

Constitutional Patriot
I hope this turns out to be real. This is exactly the kind of line in the sand that needs to be drawn at the state level. The governor better be sure he has a handle on his own national guard because he's gonna need them. I wonder how many MT NG are overseas in the sandbox? Probably a bunch and I wouldn't be surprised if that was part of the plan to have the nations NGs conveniently indisposed to serve their individual states as they should be doing.

I am SO glad I have a residency claim in MT because I may be moving there permanently if this goes the way of justice and liberty. This could be the beginning of a paradigm shift back to the Constitutional Republic our founders intended.

TECH32, you are pretty far off base to compare Montana folks to Californians...there is NO COMPARISON.
 

Observer999

Inactive
MONTANA ROCKS ... it's almost organismic living next to this state! It's kinda weird living here [northern Idaho], squeezed between the socialist state of Washington and the fundamentally 'pure-republic' of Montana.

Hell, if they do secede I'd seriously think about jumping over the border.

:dstrs:
 

rodeorector

Global Moderator
I don't understand this radical behavior in Montana. Didn't they elect a democrat governor? This would indicate a loss of touch with reality.
 
THE PEOPLE have the power. They STATE enforces that power. Washington DC is nothing but a STATE and it can only control what happens in ITS OWN state.

Incorrect. Washington, D.C. (District of Columbia) is NOT a state, rather, a federal territory controlled directly by Congress, with NO elected political representation to represent the interests of D.C.'s citizens -- this is the way the Founding Fathers set it up -- they wanted a federally controlled area set aside, to be used strictly for federal government purposes -- obviously, D.C. as a federally controlled territory, has evolved into something not envisioned by the Founding Fathers, and the predominately black population is still pushing for the right to elect their own Congressional representation.

The actual land that D.C. sits upon was surrendered by the state of Maryland, though the ORIGINAL intended area of D.C. ALSO included land located directly across the Potomac river from present-day D.C., in the state of Virginia -- D.C. never *officially* expanded across the river into the Virginia portion of the allocated land, and this land was returned to the control of the state of Virginia -- today, this area is known as Arlington, VA, home to the Pentagon, Washington-Reagan (National) Airport, Arlington House, former estate and home of Robert E. Lee, and the Arlington National Cemetery, which contains the grave sites of military and political, alike, to include former President John F. Kennedy's burial plot.


intothegoodnight
 

dogmanan

Inactive
This is great.
Will take much to keep this going and to make it happen.
When they and others states leave the union thats where I will move to .


LATER
 

AzProtector

Veteran Member
I would hope that Rick, "Adios, MOFO" Perry would get something like this and sign it.

"The Texas .45 comes in 3 sizes, Sonora ( sub-compact) Midland, (Compact), and the Republic ( full-sized)"
 

nomifyle

TB Fanatic
If Alan Keyes had beat Hussein for his Senatorial bid, I would have voted for him in a heart beat as Potus. Back on topic, if this thing catches on in Montana, Texas will be close behind. Hussien good for gun rights? Who'da thunk it?

Its likely, so goes Texas goes Louisiana. Which works for me.

Judy
 
I'd move today! Might anyway, real soon. Of course it would cause a divorce...the little lady doesn't like the cold.
I wish Tennessee had some balls!
It is WELL past time to send the socialists in washington d.c. packing! Yes, I am a radical patRIOT!
 

Straycat

Veteran Member
I don't understand this radical behavior in Montana. Didn't they elect a democrat governor? This would indicate a loss of touch with reality.

Yes, he's a democrat. But he's also a Montanan, which predominates over that. He's heavily pro-gun and hunting, pro-public lands access, takes his dog everywhere with him, and defied the laws about no guns in government buildings by hanging one of his guns on the wall over his desk.

I don't agree on absolutely everything with him, but he's a good guy.

And it won't matter if our NG is overseas. We're all armed, too.
 
Top