GOV/MIL Main "Great Reset" Thread


TB Fanatic
8:17 min

THIS is how skyrocketing diesel prices WILL AFFECT YOU

May 9, 2022

Sure, you may not fill up your car’s tank with diesel fuel at the gas pump each week. But that doesn’t mean the world’s diesel supply shortages — and the skyrocketing prices as a result — won’t affect you or your budget. In this clip, Glenn explains why EVERY American should be concerned about the rising cost of diesel: ‘Diesel fuel is the fuel that powers the economy.’

7:42 min

Why is California SURPRISED its electrical grid may FAIL?!

May 9, 2022

Glenn Beck

On Friday, Reuters reported that California officials are warning residents that the state’s electrical grid may ‘lack sufficient capacity’ during the summer, especially if something ‘extreme’ — like a forest fire — occurs (which, Glenn explains, shouldn’t really be unexpected at this point). President Biden has been destroying America’s energy supply ever since he entered the White House, and far-left politicians in California have been doing the same to their state long before. So, is California REALLY surprised it’s now facing electrical and energy problems...?


TB Fanatic
8:05 min

Saudi Oil Prices Were Lowered For China / Europe But Guess Who They Left Out (More High Gas Prices)

May 9, 2022

The Economic Ninja

Saudi Oil Prices Were Lowered For China / Europe But Guess Who They Left Out (More High Gas Prices).

(Bloomberg: Saudi Arabia/ARAMCO is dropping oil prices $5 barrel for China. Consumption/demand in China less due to lockdowns. Prices were also dropped for NW Europe and there may be some drop in the Mediterranean. Prices for the US stayed the same.

Last August, Russia and Saudi Arabia signed an historic deal. It was 50 years after the Saudis had signed the deal with the US to provide military hardware and protection in exchange for all oil to be sold in dollars. The world is abandoning the dollar and all those dollars that others kept to buy oil and other things will no longer be needed and will come back to the US. They are buying our assets like real estate, water companies with the dollars.

As the reserve currency and a Superpower, when America goes down, the rest of the world will go with it. Diesel prices are hitting highs. This not only effects the obvious, it causes hidden inflation. For instance, Amazon announced it would have to charge more because of fuel costs.

The US was energy independent about 6 months ago but there has been a rapid change. We are now energy dependent on the rest of the world and they hate us. That is why the price differential. There is no longer an agreement between us and Saudi Arabia. It will be worse as we decline. )


TB Fanatic

Dismissing Reality
Deriding Mass Formation and Dismissing its Influence During a Global Crisis – is a Verification of the Phenomenon

By Guest Author: David Marks

Historians analyzing the Covid-19 pandemic will one day consider what was going on in the minds of those who supported a narrative that only served profits and power. Looking back, they will greatly appreciate the analysis of contemporary experts, particularly Mattias Desmet, a professor in the Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences at Ghent University in Belgium. He is recognized as a leading thinker in his field, and has written over one hundred peer-reviewed academic papers.

Desmet has presented his understanding of human behavior in response to the pandemic and vaccine policies to forums and international media. His book on the topic, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, will be published in June of 2022. It examines the emotional climate that has allowed a singular, focused, crisis narrative that forbids dissenting views and relies on destructive groupthink.

The central tenet of Desmet’s evaluation of the emotional response to the pandemic rests on the psychological concept of mass formation. It is a general term that applies to individual, group, and crowd behavior as influenced by the manipulations and conduct of dominant social forces. The concept is not new — nor is it in any way a stretch to apply it in analyzing the extensive anxiety driving the attitudes and demeanor of billions of people during the world-wide pandemic.

Mass formation can be associated with mass psychosis, a disturbance in the minds of small or large groups — to the degree where there is a loss of contact with reality — often with an eclipse of morality and objectification of an imagined enemy.

The hostile and dismissive response to Desmet’s perspective on the pandemic’s emotional climate is both fascinating and revelatory.

Enter The Media
Desmet was interviewed by a number of prominent individuals in a variety of media outlets, with his views on the current rise of mass formation taken seriously by some of the public and medical professionals with open minds. Detractors quickly appeared in an attempt to minimize his impact.

When Dr. Robert Malone, respected veteran expert in molecular biology and a pioneer in mRNA research, discussed and amplified Desmet’s theory on the “Joe Rogan Experience,” a threshold seemed to have been crossed. Mainstream media and medical websites went into high gear pronouncing mass formation as discredited and bunk. The distain for anyone invoking the term was overt. Medpage Today reported, “It sounds like the name of your friend's failed high school band.”

The vast majority of criticism had little to say about the reasonable theory that government representatives, a huge portion of the medical profession and at least one-third of the general population had fallen into a trance. And most importantly, there was no willingness to consider that there might be a powerful psychological force skewing judgement and provoking irrational behavior.

In a show of reflexive impulsive bias, media coverage claimed that the concept of mass formation did not exist. This response simply revealed how the process of mass formation blinds the minds of scientists and journalists.

Widely attributed press sources, including Reuters, quickly found experts who said that, “Mass formation psychosis is not an academic term recognized in the field of psychology, nor is there evidence of any such phenomenon occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic.” To ensure readers need not fear they were under any spell, they advised, “numerous psychologists have also told Reuters that such a condition is not officially recognized.”

Mass formation was also dismissed in a number of articles because it is not mentioned in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a simplified clinical guide to individual psychiatric disorders that does not cover crowd psychology.

Not Necessarily The News
The blast of commentary was presented as objective news, yet the press response directly conflicts with the knowledge of prominent psychotherapists, including luminaries who enriched the modern understanding of the human psyche, such as Scipio Sighele, Gustave Le Bon, Elio Cannetti, and Hannah Arendt.

In his 1921 book on Crowd Psychology and Ego Analysis, the founder of psychotherapy, Sigmund Freud, discusses mass formation and its ramifications, saying, “The strangest and at the same time most important phenomenon of mass formation is the increase in affectivity evoked in each individual (as) exaltation or intensification of emotion.”

The preeminent psychiatrist, Carl Jung, highlights mass formation in his prescient 1957 book, The Undiscovered Self, on the state of mankind and the dangers of modern materialism. His perspective is foundational, relative to Desmet’s recent findings:
“Under the influence of scientific assumptions, not only the psyche but the individual man and, indeed, all individual events whatsoever suffer a leveling down and a process of blurring that distorts the picture of reality into a conceptual average. We ought not to underestimate the psychological effect of the statistical world picture: it displaces the individual in favor of anonymous units that pile up into mass formations.”
Despite a wealth of historical precedents, the reaction to Desmet’s ideas was bizarre and unfounded. A renowned and respected psychotherapist had postulated that we might need to reconsider the unconscious response to lockdowns and mandates — and his ideas were summarily dismissed by the voice of the state.

The diagnosis is clear. Deriding mass formation and dismissing its influence during a global crisis is in itself a verification of the phenomenon. Mainstream media demonstrates how it perpetuates mass formation by indulging in another well-accepted psychological phenomenon: denial. Considering the degree of unwillingness to confront the reality of ineffectiveness and dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines, an evaluation of the news media’s response to the current plague can also be deemed delusional.

The Syndrome Persists
In recent decades, studies have shown that psychological problems are increasing geometrically. Rather than attempting to reverse this dysfunction, powerful forces in government and the corporate press continue to mislead and prey on an expanding susceptible population, who in the face of crisis, cling to authority.

It is the vulnerability of dissatisfied populations that allows mass formation.

Desmet suggests that a number of factors, including; isolation, a sense that life is meaningless — and particularly free-floating anxiety, frustration and aggression — independently or in unison, can lead to mass formation and its repercussions.

Jung also viewed precursors to dysfunction in the context of a modern age where the “State” and “Scientific Rationalism” play critical roles in supporting mass formation, saying:
“Science supplies us with, instead of the concrete individual, the names of organizations and, at the highest point, the abstract idea of the State as the principle of political reality. Apart from agglomerations of huge masses of people, in which the individual disappears anyway, one of the chief factors responsible for psychological mass-mindedness is scientific rationalism, which robs the individual of his foundations and his dignity. As a social unit he has lost his individuality and become a mere abstract number in the bureau of statistics. He can only play the role of an interchangeable unit of infinitesimal importance.”
The concept of mass formation and its relevance to the pandemic are undeniable when our current crisis is examined carefully, particularly when the inadequacies and inconsistencies of prevention and treatment are analyzed and understood.

Vaccines were initially presented as the only viable way to stem a deadly disease. A subsequent admission that they did not stop transmission was revealed in the context that they continued to be effective and safe. Any serious analysis of these claims confirms this also is a fabrication.

There is an important and viable inquiry asking how a false and deadly narrative continues to be accepted. Policies supporting repressive controls and ongoing vaccination have no foundation other than nonsensical dictates and support from a public bolstered with questionable data, prodded to near-hysteria.

The very forces that are responsible for the false narrative can only take a defensive position when light is shed on their methodology. The dogmatic negation of the idea that a mass formation is responsible for blind compliance and irrational acceptance of dangerous therapies is striking and revelatory.

As time passes, the induced fear and coerced consent will continue to be exposed as part of a scheme promoting selfish interests, and verifiably nothing to do with good health.

Eventually this epoch will be recognized for its essential impetus; the nefarious entrancement of a vulnerable world.


TB Fanatic
'42 National Emergencies': How The WHO And Globalists Are Gaining Control 5:30 min

'42 National Emergencies': How The WHO And Globalists Are Gaining Control (James Roguski, an independent Investigator)
Bannons War Room Published May 9, 2022

(James Roguski: Starting point World Health Organization is analogous to the Executive Branch. The World Health Assembly is very similar to our Senate. They meet once a year, this year on the 22-28 of May in Geneva. So 194 nations all send delegates to Geneva. They each get 1 vote. One of the things they will be doing is voting on Amendments that were negotiated and submitted in secret and never published, but the US delegate, Loyce Pace presented these to the WHO on Jan 18 of this year. There is a 4 month lead requirement to submit Amendments prior to the meeting. Then it went completely hidden.

He learned about it on March 28 and on April 12, the documents finally popped up on the WHO's website. All he has done is read documents on the WHO website and federal register.
Essentially what the documents do is to alter the International Health Regulations. They originate prior to the Civil War era and were about sanitary conditions - the plague, smallpox and yellow fever. When the WHO was started in 1948, they took over the sanitary rules and they became the International Health Regulations.

In 2005, they went through a very large revision. What we are dealing with now are Amendments that serve to give much more power to the WHO. The International Health Regulations as they stand, actually have the WHO in shackles. They can't do what they would like to do, which is what they refer to as a public health emergency of international concern -PHEIC.

Currently, they have to respect the sovereignty of every nation that is a member and they have to get their approval to declare an emergency. The amendments, amongst doing many other things, would take away the requirement that they work with individual nation's governments to get their approval and gives the power to the Director General (Tedros.) He could declare an emergency anytime he wants for any reason - overriding national sovereignty. In essence, he would become the dictator general of the WHO, able to declare emergencies at will.

Now we are still under the emergency they declared for Corona, but this all cascades down. He's going to guess that most of the viewers aren't aware that the US is under 42 national emergencies - going back to the hostage crisis in Iran, that are still active. The worst is the Public Health emergency that is controlled by the US Secty. of Health and Human Services, that is what makes the money flow.

Bannon: Why haven't there been any hearings? Has there been anything on Capitol Hill like Loyce Pace coming forward and Rand Paul grilling her like he did Fauci? Has there been any public disclosure where the government had to come through and present?

Roguski: Absolutely not. It was hidden. That is why we are calling for people to go to

Copy the e-mail and send it to your legislators and Attorney Generals

It's been hidden. They wanted it to pop up the end of May and just brush over it.
Last edited:


TB Fanatic
[Note: videos have not been watched or summarized. ]

WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution
The United States has proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations which will be voted on by the World Health Assembly scheduled for May 22-28, 2022.

Quick link to EVIDENCE: DontYouDare.INFO
Please watch the (3) videos below…

2:52 min

Please watch the video below…

Single World Government Ushered In By 'WHO' Covid-19 "Emergency" Weaponized To Overthrow Sovereignty

This is the fourth article in this series.
  1. Pandemic Treaty
  2. The People’s Treaty
  3. Speaking Truth To Power
  4. WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution
  5. Abolish the WHO
  6. Pandemic Mitigation Project
  7. An Open Letter to the WHO
  10. Multilingual information regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
  11. THEY will control nothing, and WE will be free


Double Flyer
990KB ∙ PDF File
Read now

Please watch the testimony below:

Corona Investigative Committee, Session 102 : OVALmedia : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive 3:55:15 min

Corona Investigative Committee, Session 102 : OVALmedia : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

James Roguski | Session 102: Un(der)cover


Act of June 14, 1948, Public Law 80-643, 62 STAT 441, providing for membership and participation by the United States in the World Health Organization and authorizing an appropriation therefor | DocsTeach


EXCERPT: Even if the amendments are “approved” by the World Health Assembly, each and every nation on earth will have 6 months to flat out reject the amendments.

EXHIBIT C-1: This is where I first learned of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations on March 28, 2022.
Pay particular attention to the proposed amendments to Sections 2, 3 and 5 of Article 12, and Article 59.

EXHIBIT C-2: The amendments seem to have remained hidden until they were first published on the WHO website on April 12, 2022.

EXCERPT: The needle in the haystack:
The proposed amendments would remove the straight-jacket that currently restricts the actions of the WHO and would transfer so much UNFETTERED AUTHORITY to the Director-General that he would more appropriately be referred to as the Dictator General.

The existing period of time that each member nation has to notify the WHO of their REJECTION of any approved amendments is currently 18 months. The amendments would reduce that time period to 6 months.

Many thanks to Karen Bracken for creating the PDF document summary analysis of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations below:

Summary Of Amendments To The International Health Regulations
6.85MB ∙ PDF File
Read now

Strengthening WHO Preparedness for and Response to Health Emergencies

Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Republic of Korea
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
United States of America
Member States of the European Union



EXHIBIT G: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Final rule. (PAGES 6969-6970)

EXCERPT: The definition of “public health emergency” was redefined to come into lockstep with the WHO. This is “void for vagueness.”
Entered into the Federal Register on the last full day of the Obama Administration.

The following is an educated guess.

The link on which the WHO has posted a PDF of the delegates that attended previous World Health Assembly meetings has a specific format and seems to be following a pattern.

The first link does not work, but I suspect that, when the WHO feels like it, the delegate list will be placed here:

2022 75th World Health Assembly

These links work...

2021 74th World Health Assembly

2020 73th World Health Assembly

2019 72th World Health Assembly

and so on...

It is reasonable that the WHO only publishes the details of the attendees AFTER the event has begun and the attendees have presented their credentials to enter. I do not see anything wrong with that.

However, it is ABSOLUTELY UNACCEPTABLE that the names of the delegates who will be attending the upcoming Assembly have been occult (hidden) from the public in every nation of the world.

I have also been able to locate the list of delegates who have attended the most recent meetings:

List of Delegates and Other Participants (Special Session of the World Health Assembly in November 2021)

List of members and other participants (Executive Board Meeting in January 2022)

To my knowledge, the following occult (hidden) document has NOT been made available to the public. One would think that by now (April 29, 2022) the list of people who have been “chosen” to attend the 75th World Health Assembly must have been chosen but, to my knowledge, no such list has been published by any agency or ministry in any of the 194 member nations.


What would YOU do if you learned that a United States’ delegate to the World Health Organization had submitted a proposal to transfer the sovereignty of 194 nations over to the WHO??

Please watch this video…

DON'T YOU DARE 4:44 min

For more, (including the Amendments) visit his substack:
Last edited:


TB Fanatic
[TRAILER] How the WHO Will Create and Run Future Pandemics -Dr Tess Lawrie 2:19 min

[TRAILER] How the WHO Will Create and Run Future Pandemics -Dr Tess Lawrie
Bright Light News Published May 9, 2022

[TRAILER] The WHO will vote to put themselves in global control over future pandemic responses at their World Assembly in Geneva May 22-28. Such A dangerous power grab would be catastrophic to the health and freedoms of every citizen.

FULL INTERVIEW: [INTERVIEW] The WHO Should Concern You -Drs Tess Lawrie & Mark Trozzi


TB Fanatic
Does Congressional Oversight Still Exist? 1:49 min

Does Congressional Oversight Still Exist?
Just the News - Not Noise Published May 9, 2022
There’s a growing mindset among executive branch bureaucracies that Americans are no longer custodians of their own government. Have we made bureaucracy too independent? Sen. Ron Johnson weighs in on the issue.

Kendall v. United States ex Rel. Stokes, 37 U.S. 524 (1838)

Kendall v. United States ex Rel. Stokes, 37 U.S. 524 (1838)

U.S. Supreme Court
Kendall v. United States ex Rel. Stokes, 37 U.S. 12 Pet. 524 524 (1838)
Kendall v. United States ex Rel. Stokes

37 U.S. (12 Pet.) 524



MR. JUSTICE THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the Court:

"The executive power is vested in a President, and as far as his powers are derived from the Constitution, he is beyond the reach of any other department except in the mode prescribed by the Constitution through the impeaching power. But it by no means follows that every officer in every branch of that department is under the exclusive direction of the President. Such a principle, we apprehend, is not and certainly cannot be claimed by the President.

"There are certain political duties imposed upon many officers in the Executive Department the discharge of which is under the direction of the President. But it would be an alarming doctrine that Congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the Constitution, and in such cases the duty and responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control of the law, and not to the direction of the President. And this is emphatically the case where the duty enjoined is of a mere ministerial character....."

...."It was urged at the bar that the Postmaster General was alone subject to the direction and control of the President, with respect to the execution of the duty imposed upon him by this law, and this right of the President is claimed as growing out of the obligation imposed upon him by the Constitution to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. This is a doctrine that cannot receive the sanction of this Court. It would be vesting in the President a dispensing power which has no countenance for its support in any part of the Constitution, and is asserting a principle which, if carried out in its results to all cases falling within it, would be clothing the President with a power entirely to control the legislation of Congress and paralyze the administration of justice.

"To contend that the obligation imposed on the President to see the laws faithfully executed implies a power to forbid their execution is a novel construction of the Constitution, and entirely inadmissible. ..."


TB Fanatic


Diesel fuel is in short supply as prices surge — Here’s what that means for inflation


Pippa Stevens@PIPPASTEVENS13

  • Diesel fuel is in short supply as demand rebounds following the pandemic, while supply remains tight.
  • Prices have surged to record levels, adding to inflationary concerns across the economy.
  • The problem is especially acute on the East Coast, where prices have become “unhinged,” according to one analyst.
  • Higher prices are “certainly going to translate into more expensive goods,” said GasBuddy’s Patrick De Haan.
The prices for gas and diesel fuel, over $6.00 a gallon, are displayed at a petrol station in Los Angeles, March 2, 2022.

The prices for gas and diesel fuel, over $6.00 a gallon, are displayed at a petrol station in Los Angeles, March 2, 2022.
Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images

Diesel prices are surging, contributing to inflationary headwinds due to the fuel’s vital role in the American and global economy. Tankers, trains and trucks all run on diesel. The fuel is also used across industries including farming, manufacturing, metals and mining.

“Diesel is the fuel that powers the economy,” said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy. Higher prices are “certainly going to translate into more expensive goods,” he said, since these higher fuel costs will be passed along to consumers. “Especially at the grocery store, the hardware store, anywhere you shop.”

In other words, the impacts will be felt across the economy.

Diesel’s surge
The jump in prices comes on the heels of growing demand as economies around the world get back to business. This, in turn, has pushed inventories to historic lows. Products like diesel, heating oil and jet fuel are known as “middle distillates,” since they are made from the middle of the boiling range when oil is turned into products.

U.S. distillate inventory is now at the lowest level in more than decade. The move is even more extreme on the East Coast, where stockpiles are at the lowest since 1996. Diesel and jet fuel at New York harbor are now trading well above $200 per barrel, according to UBS.

Europe’s move away from dependency on Russian energy is hastening the rapid price appreciation. The bloc currently imports around 700,000 barrels per day of diesel from Russia, according to Stephen Brennock at brokerage PVM.

″[T]he tightness in global supply will be exacerbated by the EU’s proposal to ban Russian oil imports,” he said. “The ban, if approved, will have an outsized impact on product markets and especially diesel….There is now growing anxiety that Europe might run out of diesel.”

Energy consultancy Rystad echoed this point, saying that the loss of Russian refined products is going to make diesel shortages in Europe “more acute.”

Refiners can’t just ramp up output to meet surging demand, and utilization rates are already above 90%. In the U.S., refining capacity has decreased in recent years. The largest refining complex on the East Coast — Philadelphia Energy Solutions — shut down following a fire in June 2019.

Several refiners are now being reconfigured to make biofuel, which has also reduced capacity.

Some refiners are also undergoing routine maintenance checks that were overdue following the pandemic. These facilities typically run flat out – 24 hours a day, seven days a week – and so at some point the machinery needs to be checked.

The East Coast relies heavily on other areas of the country for refined products, De Haan said. Now, Europe is competing for these same fuels as it turns away from Russia.

‘Unmoored’ prices
A common saying in commodity markets is “the cure for high prices is high prices.” But that might not be the case this time around. According to UBS, distillate demand tends to be less elastic than gasoline prices.

In other words, while high prices at the pump might deter consumers, if a business needs to get goods from point A to point B, it’s going to pay those higher prices.

Tom Kloza, head of global energy research at OPIS, said that in years past a barrel of diesel typically sold for $10 above the price of crude oil. Today, that differential – known as the crack spread – has surged to a record high above $70.

“It’s become untethered, unmoored, a little bit unhinged. These are prices we’re not used to seeing,” he said, adding that there are large price differences across the U.S.

Kloza said diesel at New York harbor is now trading around $5 per gallon, while jet fuel prices at the harbor, which usually mirrors diesel prices, are around $6.72. That equates to roughly $282 per barrel.

“These are numbers that are not just off the charts. They’re off the walls, out of the building, and maybe out of the solar system,” he said.

Retail diesel prices are also surging. On Friday the national average for a gallon hit a record of $5.51, according to AAA, after hitting a new high every single day over the last week.

Higher diesel prices is translating to higher profit margins for refiners, who are now incentivized to make as much as they possibly can. At a certain point, this could lead to tightness in the gasoline market, pushing up the high prices consumers are already seeing at the pump.
In the meantime, consumers can expect prices for goods to keep on climbing.

“It’s going to be a double whammy on consumers in the weeks and months ahead as these diesel prices trickle down to the cost of goods — another piece of inflation that’s going to hit consumers,” GasBuddy’s De Haan said, adding that the full impact of the recent surge in prices has yet to be felt.


TB Fanatic

WHO Is Attempting A Power Grab ( James Roguski)
Bannons War Room Published May 10, 2022

(Roguski Update: Some Reps in the Louisiana Assembly put in a resolution on this. We need a Brief presented to SCOTUS that people who negotiated this and are involved in this have not followed proper protocols. cell 310-619-3055)

The Biden Administration Wants To Strengthen The WHO's Ability To Identify And Control Pandemics 10:06 min

The Biden Administration Wants To Strengthen The WHO's Ability To Identify And Control Pandemics (Amb. Pete Hoekstra)
Bannons War Room Published May 10, 2022

(Bannon: Are we over-thinking this?

Hoekstra - top nat'l security advisor to Trump: Fauci, Gates for this. Amendments proposed by the Biden Admin. to strengthen WHO. Hoeksta points out WHO never found the origins of the virus because they never put pressure on China. They pushed the "natural origins" narrative and squashed opinions to the contrary. They are the ones, early on, that said we don't have to worry about it because there is no human to human transmission. Hoekstra says he knows people who can tell you that they knew there was such transmission at that time. WHO is the one that attacked Trump when he put in travel restrictions from China.

He has evidence that WHO helped spread Chinese propaganda and helped facilitate the CCP strategy to spread the virus globally. Now we have the Biden Administration saying we need to strengthen the WHO's ability to identify pandemics and actually give them more power to put into practice policies that would control this pandemic on a global basis. We would be creating a Fauci at the international level with more money and power. It will give them more clout internationally to create policy. Pres Trump had the right idea to defund and get out of organization. This will give them a tremendous increase and power and authority by the end of this month.

Bannon: The Founders set it up that Treaties had to pas 2/3 of the Senate. Is this really a treaty? It was independent researchers like Roguski that found it in the federal register. Is this as bad as it seems? Is Biden setting us up into something we can't get out of?

Hoekstra: Biden could get us out of it if he wanted. The problem is that Congress has been ceding power to the Executive and the judiciary and this is one more example. The Senate has authority here with this treaty, but only if they decide to use it. If someone would call for hearings, if someone would say - these reforms are so significant that it would require a re-ratification of this. It is not simple modifications. It is a re-writing of a treaty that would require re-ratification.

Where are the Conservative Republican Senators? Where are they on this massive transfer of sovereignty to the WHO, which is a failed organization? If there is no protest from the US Senate, then the President will happily accept the new authority handed to it by the Senate because the Senate has decided not to exercise its legitimate constituent role,

The Republican Senators are walking away from their responsibility and handing it over to the President and the globalists - Bill Gates, the Pharmaceuticals are clearly implicated in this, the CCP. As you said, the CCP is all over the WHO, but who else are they all over? Pharma wants the CCP controlled WHO to have more power, because then the CCP will drive health policies that will help them achieve their global ambitions.

We need the US Senate to stand up. It may only require a few - a Ted Cruz, a Rand Paul to call this out to the American people. Short of a US Senator calling out the Biden Admin, it is going to be very difficult to stop the Biden Admin from moving forward.

Bannon from a war room contributor: Tedros is a member of the Tigray Liberation Front, [a left-wing ethnic nationalist paramilitary group, banned political party, former ruling party of Ethiopia, and designated as a terrorist organization by the Ethiopian government,] which is a thousand times more brutal than Hamas and Hezbollah combined. He is a hardcore ally of Xi. WHO is owned and operated by the CCP.

Secure Freedom )


TB Fanatic
The Depopulation Agenda: When It Looks and Quacks Like a Duck, You Got to Start Asking Questions 2:46 min

The Depopulation Agenda: When It Looks and Quacks Like a Duck, You Got to Start Asking Questions
Red Voice Media Published May 10, 2022

(Attny Thomas Renz: I can tell you it looks and quacks like a duck. The Vax is killing tons of people. We know this. The government knows this. Everybody knows this. Pfizer knows this. Their Dec, Jan March post authorization study shows this. There were massive side effects. Go on any funeral home website and you will see the numbers of 40-50 year olds who have died of mysterious causes. This is a constant thing.

It is not hard to see what's happening. It is killing people on a massive scale. There is no need for the vax. It is not doing anything positive. There is early treatment that works, but they are taking active steps to keep people dying.

Now why are they doing that? Is it population control? I don't know, but what I do know is there has been extensive conversation from people like Harari about "useless eaters." Bill Gates has talked about if we are successful with our vaccines, we can reduce reproduction rates and make people infertile - control the population. [clip of Gates Ted Talk] I don't have proof, but if it walks like a duck.

When I say this, it makes me uncomfortable. It sounds crazy. If you had told me 3 years ago that they were going to shut down my country, wear a mask and then force me to have gene therapy, I would have said that you were a crazy conspiracy theorist - that you were nuts. But low and behold...)

Obama's Favorite Author and a Nazi Sympathizer: Yuval Noah Harari Is a "Sick, Sick Puppy" 2:46 min

Obama's Favorite Author and a Nazi Sympathizer: Yuval Noah Harari Is a "Sick, Sick Puppy"
Red Voice Media Published May 10, 2022

Attorney Thomas Renz: "The reason he doesn't like religion is [that] religion inherently indicates free will... When we talk about manipulating and controlling [free will], that's the ultimate form of slavery. So, in addition to being a Nazi sympathizer, he's also pro-slavery."

Purposeful Destabilization of the United States: Manufactured Food Crises, War, and Soaring Inflation 3:21 min

Purposeful Destabilization of the United States: Manufactured Food Crises, War, and Soaring Inflation
Red Voice Media Published May 10, 2022

"These things are all coming together; they're intentional, they're planned, and it's about creating destabilization. They want to destabilize America. They want to bring us down. America is a shining beacon of freedom. They've got to shut us down because if America stands, their plan is going to fail globally."

Full Interview: Exposing the Globalist Agenda and Crimes Against Humanity: Thomas Renz [VIDEO INTERVIEW]


TB Fanatic
URGENT: Stop Global Governance—The Vote to Give Total Power to the WHO Takes Place In 2 Weeks 4:06 min

URGENT: Stop Global Governance—The Vote to Give Total Power to the WHO Takes Place In 2 Weeks
The Vigilant Fox Published May 10, 2022

Michele Bachmann: "This authority that they would be given would impact 99.4% of all the people in the world... The WHO would have decision-making authority to intervene into the United States' government policy and any nation of the world without our permission. For instance, the lockdowns where you see 26 million people today locked down in Shanghai, China... the WHO would have the authority to be able to impose that here in the United States for whatever pretext they want. They don't have to show data; they could do this. What this does, bottom line, is it creates a platform for global governance, global governance through the WHO."

Full Video: Michele Bachmann: WHO Vote Threatens U.S. Sovereignty


TB Fanatic
Reiner Fuellmich: The Ultimate Goal Of The Great Reset Is 'One World Government' 2:00 min

Reiner Fuellmich: The Ultimate Goal Of The Great Reset Is 'One World Government'
Sunfellow on COVID-19 Published May 10, 2022
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich describes the ultimate goal of the Great Reset is "keeping us in panic mode for as long as it takes to install this one world government". This will be achieved through the United Nations, under complete control by the World Economic Forum, a creation of Klaus Schwabs'. Feullmich argues that causing "as much chaos as possible" is part of the method to influence mass obedience.

Original Video Excerpt:
The Ultimate Goal of The Great Reset Is ‘One World Government’ - Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Full Episode:
‘Friday Roundtable’ Episode 5: Crimes Against Humanity – A Cross Examination of the Global Pandemic With Judy Mikovits, Reiner Fuellmich + More - Friday Roundtable - CHD TV: Livestreaming Video & Audio


TB Fanatic
2;10 min

(TRAILER) The Great Reset: A docuseries by Rebel News
Rebel News Published May 10, 2022
'The Great Reset' is a book co-authored by World Economic Forum chairman Klaus Schwab. This docuseries will examine the book, published in June 2020, and the individuals working to implement the WEF's agenda across the globe.

Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story. for more great content.


TB Fanatic
We Are Surrounded By Psychopaths: EU Leaders Seek to Sell Citizens Out to the Pharmaceutical Mafia 2:13 min

We Are Surrounded By Psychopaths: EU Leaders Seek to Sell Citizens Out to the Pharmaceutical Mafia
The Vigilant Fox Published May 10, 2022 137 Views

Croatian [EU] MEP Mislav Kolakušić: "Now these same idiots or psychopaths, I'm not sure what they really are, want to make all of our medical data, medical history, and accompanying findings, lab findings, and discharge letters available to the industry... Each of our visits to the doctor will be available to a large number of people, which will make our health condition subject to a large number of abuses, because this data will be traded like all other data..."

Video Source: View:


TB Fanatic
Global Health Under the Control of WHO Director-General Tedros: Dr. Peter Breggin Breaks Down Biden's Proposed Amendments 10:44 min

Global Health Under the Control of WHO Director-General Tedros: Dr. Peter Breggin Breaks Down Biden's Proposed Amendments
The Vigilant Fox Published May 10, 2022

"The amendments put a line through the restraint on when the World Health Organization can call for a health disaster or emergency in a country. [The WHO could] do so without any cooperation or agreement or even resistance from the country, and it can draw this conclusion based on the consideration, not proof or evidence, [but] the consideration of Tedros... There are no criteria for what is a public health emergency other than the Director-General can set his priority and move them as he wishes... In other words, we no longer have sovereignty over the issue of 'Do we have a health emergency that requires the intervention of the World Health Organization?'... This is socialized global health."

Dr. Peter Breggin's Urgent Post: Biden Handing Over U.S. Sovereignty to WHO


TB Fanatic

These 20 States Threaten Legal Action Over Biden's 'Ministry Of Truth'

TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 - 05:45 PM
Via Organic Prepper's Daisy Luther - author of Prepper’s Pantry and The Blackout Book,

The attorneys general of 20 states have threatened legal action against the US government unless they disband the newly formed Disinformation Governance Board.

We shared with you recently an article about the people behind the DGB, who have a history of trying to curb dissenting speech by calling it “disinformation.” We here at the OP have been the targets of censorship before and would not be surprised to see more of the same. (Here’s how we’re meeting the possibility of further oppression head-on.)

It turns out that we’re not the only ones concerned about this.

What’s being done?
In a letter addressed to DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, the Attorney General of Virginia, Jason Miyares, spoke for the AGs of 19 other states and shared his concerns about the overreach.

The letter was acquired by
As the chief legal officers of our respective States, we, the undersigned Attorneys General, are tasked not just with enforcing the laws but with protecting the constitutional rights of all our citizens. Today we write you to insist that you immediately cease taking action that appears designed exclusively for the purpose of suppressing the exercise of constitutional rights.
Every American knows that the Constitution forbids the government to “abridg[e] the freedom of speech.” US Const. Amend. I. As Justice Robert Jackson wrote nearly eighty years ago, “f there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion.” West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 642 (1943).
Your recent testimony before the US House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, however, indicated that the Department of Homeland Security, under your leadership, is doing exactly that: prescribing orthodoxy by slapping a federal-government label of “disinformation” or “misinformation” on speech that government bureaucrats, operating behind closed doors, decree to be improper. This is an unacceptable and downright alarming encroachment on every citizen’s right to express his or her opinions, engage in political debate, and disagree with the government. The Biden Administration’s latest effort to decide what speech is “acceptable” and “orthodox” combines McCarthyite speech policing with the secrecy of the English Star Chamber.
In short, you seem to have misunderstood George Orwell: the “Ministry of Truth” described in 1984 was intended as a warning against the dangers of socialism, not as a model government agency. “MiniTru” and its thuggish apparatchiks are the villains in that story, not the heroes. For the sake of our democracy, you must immediately disband the “Disinformation Governance Board” and cease all efforts to police Americans’ protected speech. The existence of the Disinformation Governance Board will inevitably have a chilling effect on free speech.
Americans will hesitate before they voice their constitutionally protected opinions, knowing that the government’s censors may be watching, and some will decide it is safer to keep their opinions to themselves.
The resulting damage to our political system and our culture will be incalculable: as a democracy, our political debates and decisions are supposed to take place in the public square, where every citizen can participate, rather than in government office buildings where hand-picked and unaccountable partisan committees are insulated from public supervision and criticism.
(Read the rest of the letter here.)
The letter goes on to question the timing of the new Ministry of Truth (just as Elon Musk completes the purchase of Twitter with the stated goal of restoring free speech on the platform). It also calls into question the dubious qualifications of head honcho, Nina Jancowiz, who AG Miyares describes as “often in error but never in doubt.”

How will the AGs enforce this?
In a firmly worded promise, Miyares concludes:

Unless you turn back now and disband this Orwellian Disinformation Governance Board immediately, the undersigned will have no choice but to consider judicial remedies to protect the rights of their citizens.

We sincerely hope this puts a halt to the censorship efforts of the Biden administration.

Who signed the letter?
The letter was signed by the attorneys general of 20 states. We hope that other states follow in their footsteps to protect this vital constitutional right. (Contact your state’s AG and let them know you support them or want them to get on board, too!)

The following AGs signed the letter.

    • Jason S. Miyares, Virginia (the author of the letter)
    • Steve Marshall, Alabama
    • Mark Brnovich, Arizona
    • Leslie Rutledge, Arkansas
    • Ashley Moody, Florida
    • Christopher M. Carr, Georgia
    • Todd Rokita, Indiana
    • Derek Schmidt, Kansas
    • Daniel Cameron, Kentucky
    • Jeff Landry, Louisiana
    • Lynn Fitch, Mississippi
    • Eric Schmitt, Missouri
    • Austin Knudson, Montana
    • Douglas J. Peterson, Nebraska
    • David Yost, Ohio
    • John M. O’Connor, Oklahoma
    • Alan Wilson, South Carolina
    • Ken Paxton, Texas
    • Sean D. Reyes, Utah
    • Patrick Morrisey, West Virginia
Will this effort gain any traction with the DHS and the current administration? We are not holding our breath.


TB Fanatic

Leftists Hate Free Speech Because They Fear Dissent, Not "Disinformation"

TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 - 09:05 PM
Authored by Brandon Smith via,

I think one of the most bizarre social developments of the past 10 years in the US has been the slow but steady shift of the political left as supposed defenders of free speech to enemies of free speech. The level of mental gymnastics on display by leftists to justify their attacks on freedom and the 1st Amendment is bewildering. So much so that I begin to question if liberals and leftists ever actually had any respect for 1st Amendment rights to begin with? Or, maybe the only freedom they cared about all along was the freedom to watch pornography…

One can see the steady progression of this war on speech and ideas, and the end game is predictable: Is anyone really that surprised that the Biden Administration is implementing a Ministry of Truth in the form of the DHS Disinformation Governance Board? Can we just accept the reality at this point that leftists are evil and their efforts feed into an agenda of authoritarianism? Is there any evidence to the contrary?

Before I get into this issue, I think it’s important to point out that it’s becoming tiresome to hear arguments these days suggesting that meeting leftists “somewhere in the middle” is the best and most desirable option. I see this attitude all over the place and I think it comes from a certain naivety about the situation we are facing as a country. Moderates and “normies” along with people like Bill Maher and Russell Brand are FINALLY starting to realize how bag-lady-crazy leftists are and the pendulum is swinging back slightly. But, it was conservatives that were calling out the social justice cult and their highway to hell for years.

While everyone else was blissfully ignorant, we were fighting the battles that stalled the leftist advance. This is not to say I’m not happy to have moderates and reformed liberals on board, it’s a great thing. However, the time for diplomacy and meeting leftists halfway is long dead.

There is no such thing as a “center” in our society anymore, either you lean conservative and you support freedom, or you lean left and support authoritarianism. There is no magical and Utopian in-between that we need to achieve to make things right. We are not required to tolerate leftist authoritarianism because of “democracy.” Sometimes certain ideologies and certain groups are mutually exclusive to freedom; meaning, they cannot coexist within a society that values liberty.

We need to be clear about where the lines are drawn, because sitting on the fence is not an option. Walk in middle of road? Get squished like grape.

To understand how leftists got to the point of enthusiastic hatred of free speech rights there are some psychological and philosophical factors that need to be addressed. These include specific ideals that leftists value that are disjointed or simply irrational:

Hate Speech Is Real And Must Be Censored?
First, as I have argued for many years, there is no such thing as “hate speech.” There is speech that some people don’t like and speech they are offended by. That is all.

Constitutionally, there is no hate speech. People are allowed to say any offensive thing they wish and believe however they wish as long as they are not slandering a person’s reputation with lies or threatening them with direct bodily harm. If you are offended by criticism, that is your problem.

Leftists believe the opposite. Instead of growing a thicker skin they think that “hate speech” should be illegal and that they should be the people that determine what hate speech is. This is a kind of magical door to power, because if you can declare yourself the arbiter of hate speech you give yourself the authority to control ALL speech. That is to say, as the thought police all you have to do is label everything you don’t like as hate speech, no matter how factual, and you now dictate the course of society.

No one is capable of this kind of objectivity or benevolence. No person alive has the ability to determine what speech is acceptable without bias. Like the One Ring in the Lord of The Rings, there is no individual or group capable of wielding such power without being corrupted by it.

Either there is no hate speech, or everything becomes hate speech.

Free Speech Is Negated By Property Rights?
This is in direct reference to social media websites and it’s an oversimplification of the issue of free speech and large social media platforms. Here is the conundrum or “false paradigm” if you will:

Leftists argue for private property rights, but only when it comes to vast corporate big tech platforms like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc. They like private property rights for companies that they think are on their side politically; they hate private property rights for everyone else.

Just look at their response to Elon Musk’s recent Twitter buyout; the leftists are demanding that Musk be stopped at all costs, and they demand that the SEC and FCC step in to disrupt the sale because they claim Musk’s purchase is a “threat to democracy.”

The media itself is clamoring to disrupt Musk’s takeover of Twitter. Whether or not you trust him, Musk’s acquisition of the platform has at least exposed the totalitarian attitudes of mainstream journalists for everyone to see. They are now even admitting on air that THEY control public discussion; that it is “their job,” and they see Musk as a threat to that monopoly.

Why are Elon Musk’s private property rights less important or protected than the original shareholders of Twitter (Vangaurd, BlackRock, Morgan Stanley and a Saudi Prince)? Because Musk does not claim to represent leftist designs and interests? Leftists have no principles, they only care about manufacturing consent. Their method of winning requires that they never restrict themselves within the boundaries of values or morals. Again, this is the epitome of pure evil.

Beyond that irony, though, is the deeper issue of government intervention vs business rights. Many people seem to think that government power is supposed to balance out corporate power when the truth is that governments and corporations work hand in hand; they are often one in the same entity.

Twitter and other Big Tech platforms receive billions upon billions of dollars in government stimulus and tax incentives every year. Corporations as a concept are essentially a socialist creation. They enjoy limited liability and corporate personhood along with other special protections under government charter. With all these protections, incentives, bailouts and stimulus measures it is almost impossible for small and new businesses to compete with them.

They represent a monopoly through cartel; they control the marketplace by colluding with each other and colluding with the government.

A perfect example of this would be the coordination between multiple Big Tech companies to bring down Parler, a conservative leaning competitor to Twitter. This required some of the biggest companies in the world working in unison along with the blessing of government officials to disrupt the ability of a new company to offer an alternative, and all because Parler was getting too big.

In the case of a private person’s home or their small business or small website, it’s true that there are no free speech rights. They can kick you out and they don’t have to give a reason. But when it comes to massive conglomerates that receive billions in OUR tax dollars in order to stay alive, no, they do not deserve private property rights. They have now made themselves into a public utility, and that means they are subject to constitutional limitations just as public schools and universities are.

This is a concept that leftists just don’t grasp. They view corporate power as sacrosanct…as long as it serves their interests.

Consider global corporations like Disney and their open intention to undermine the passage of Florida’s anti-grooming bill; this represents Disney’s vocal support for the sexualization and indoctrination of children in Florida schools. Leftists cheered the announcement and claimed that without Disney, Florida’s economy would be wrecked. Instead, the state turned the tables and took away incentives they had been giving to Disney for decades. Leftists responded by accusing Governor DeSantis of being a “fascist” and attacking free speech.

But let’s break this down: Leftists happily supported Disney, a massive conglomerate, and their efforts to undermine the will of the voters in Florida. The state government stops them from undermining the voters by taking away the money and special incentives that belong to the voters. In turn, leftists claim this is a violation of Disney’s rights?

The disparity between leftist arguments on Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter vs. Disney’s attempted sabotage of Florida law could not be more confused. When it comes to Twitter they love the idea of censorship and react with panic when the mere prospect of free speech (within the confines of US law) is presented. When it comes to Disney, they say they love the idea of free speech, and anyone that wants to limit the corporation’s influence within Florida, no matter how criminal, is accused of fascism.

The difference is obvious – Musk appears to be an uncontrolled element, while Disney is an “ally.” Free speech and property rights are only allowed for one side of the cultural divide.

Leftists attacking freedom is free speech; defending ourselves against those attacks is a threat to democracy. It’s absurd.

Disinformation Is A Threat And Censorship Is The Solution?
The holy grail of censorship is not website filters and algorithms, because as we have seen with Twitter, those platforms could be built or purchased by someone that does not share in the leftist agenda. Instead, government intervention and the ability to define what is proper and improper discourse is the ultimate goal. The end game of authoritarians is always to write mass censorship into law, as if it is justified once it is codified.

Corporate elites and political puppets like Biden pontificating about the threat of “disinformation” is hilarious for a number of reasons, but mainly because it is the power brokers and the media that have been the main purveyors of disinformation for a long time. Suddenly today they care about the spread of lies?

I think it is obvious that such people are far more worried about the spread of facts, evidence and truth. They cannot debate on fair ground because they will lose, so, the only other option is to silence us. The institution of the Disinformation Governance Board is a clear indication that the establishment and the useful idiots on the political left are becoming DESPERATE.

Their grip on the public mind is slipping, and we saw this during their recent attempts to enforce medical tyranny across the country in the name of covid. Luckily, conservatives in at least 20 red states fought against the implementation of covid lockdowns, mandates and vaccine passports which would have annihilated our constitutional rights forever.

For years I heard the argument that when the jackboots arrived conservatives would do nothing, and now we know this is nonsense. Some of the few free places in the world during two years of pandemic fear mongering were red states in America, which coincidentally also have the highest concentration of conservatives.

If you want to know what our country would look like had conservatives not stopped the tide of tyranny, just take a gander at China today. They have some of the strictest covid mandates on the planet and yet they are once again locking down millions of citizens due to “high infection rates.” Not only that, but they are starving their own people in the process.

It’s madness, and it’s exactly what leftists were arguing in favor of just a few months ago. The US is mostly open today, just as red states like mine have been free for almost the entirety of the pandemic, and what has changed? Half the country is still unvaccinated – Is there mass death in the streets? Nope. Nothing has changed in terms of covid. The mandates made no difference whatsoever, other than to disrupt the economy and reduce people’s freedoms.

Not long ago, pointing out this fact was considered “disinformation” that needed to be silenced in order to “save lives.” The Hunter Biden laptop story was called disinformation. The Wuhan Lab story was called disinformation. Fauci’s gain of function research on covid at the Wuhan lab was called disinformation. The fact that vaccinated people still contract and die from covid was called disinformation. In other words, what the government and corporate oligarchs call “disinformation” today is eventually called reality tomorrow.

I would be happy to enter into a fair debate with White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on any of the above issues and her views of what constitutes “disinformation,” but she would never do such a thing because she knows she would be crushed like a bug. It is not the government’s job to protect the public from information, whether real or fake. It is not their job to filter or censor data or ideas. They are not qualified to do this. No one is.

Leftists operate from a collectivist mentality and this makes them believe that society is a singular entity that needs to be managed and manipulated to achieve a desired outcome. They have no concept of individual responsibility and discernment, but that is a side note to the real problem. They support information control because facts and ideas outside of their narrative could possibly damage that narrative. And, if the narrative is damaged they lose their feeling of power, which is all they really care about.

If your narrative is so fragile that it does not hold up to scrutiny or alternative viewpoints then it must not be worth much of a damn. If you have to force people or manipulate people into believing the way you do, then your ideology must be fundamentally flawed. The truth speaks volumes for itself and eventually wins without force. Only lies need to be forced into the collective consciousness. Only lies require tyranny.

Eventually reality wins over propaganda, unless total censorship and totalitarianism can be achieved. Nothing has changed in the 200+ years since the creation of the Bill of Rights.

Free speech is still integral to a functioning society. Without it, society crumbles. They will claim that today things are different and that society needs to be “protected from itself.” This is what tyrants always say when trying to steal power.

Most people reading this know by now that this is a war. It’s not a political debate that requires give-and-take, but a full-bore winner-take-all conflict. A DHS faction which is mandated to monitor our speech and propagandize the public is unacceptable and must be eliminated. Leftist and globalist monopoly of social media communications platforms is unacceptable and must be eliminated. The imposition of leftist and globalist ideology into the media narrative while censoring any contrary information is unacceptable and must be eliminated. This is about saving the remaining embers of American culture. If we do not take an aggressive stand now, the next generation may never know liberty. Everything we hold dear is at stake.


TB Fanatic

Gavin Newsom Is Blaming Climate Change For The Blackouts He Is Creating

TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 - 03:05 PM
Authored by Michael Shellenberger via Substack,

Did you hear the news? California nearly got 100% of its electricity from renewables for a period last weekend!

But wait. Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration said yesterday that we would once again have blackouts this summer.

What’s going on?

2:15 min

According to Newsom’s people… climate change. That and the fact that people might actually use their air conditioners this summer.

This is bonkers. We Californians pay more for electricity than anyone else in the country except people in Hawaii.

And we’ve known for years that we needed to build more natural gas plants.

But Gavin and his people are acting surprised. I mean, who could have ever predicted that climate change would make things hotter?

Do you know what happens when there are blackouts and people can’t use their air conditioners? They die.

From homelessness and crime to energy, water, and forest fires, Newsom only makes things worse. He then looks around for someone to blame.

And when there isn’t someone to blame, he blames climate change.

The problem isn’t that Newsom isn’t running California. It’s that he’s running it into the ground.
That and running for president. And that means he wants the big money support of powerful anti-energy, pro-scarcity interests.

Not me. For the last six years I have been warning the people of California that shutting down nuclear plants, not building enough natural gas plants, and over-relying on weather dependent renewables would be a disaster.

I testified to Congress SIX TIMES warning of the disaster that’s now unfolding.

There’s a role for renewables. I have solar panels in my backyard. But the fifth largest economy in the world can’t rely on the weather, particularly not during a time of climate change.

The same week California generated nearly 100% of its electricity from renewables, it also had to shut off electricity coming from its solar farms.

The problem with weather-dependent renewables is that they produce too much energy when we don’t need it and not enough when we do.

It was misleading for people to point to a few minutes during one day when energy from renewables matched demand for electricity. The rest of the time they aren’t matched, which is why they make electricity so expensive.

Our electricity rates rose seven times more than they did in the rest of the US over the last 10 years. And now Newsom’s people say they will raise electricity rates up to 9 percent every year over the next three years.

California needs abundant and reliable energy. As governor, I will make sure we have it.


TB Fanatic

US Gasoline Prices Hit Record And Peak Driving Season Has Yet To Come

TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022 - 07:10 AM

U.S. retail gasoline and diesel prices at the pump hit a new record, according to the American Automobile Association (AAA). Soaring fuel prices come three weeks before the summer driving season begins, a challenge for the Biden administration and Federal Reserve as they combat the highest inflation in four decades.

Across the board, fuel prices are at record highs: AAA's new data shows the average gasoline price at the pump hit $4.374 a gallon (as of Tuesday). The retail price of diesel fuel also hit a new record of $5.50.

It turns out there's no easy solution for the Biden administration to halt rising fuel prices, even though they instructed a massive one million barrels per day release of the SPR through the midterm elections. Still, markets are forward-looking and have continued to rise as it turns out the White House has instructed the SPR to begin refilling operations in 2023.

The SPR was supposed to subdue fuel prices ahead of the driving season, but that seems unavoidable. Energy is a key driver in inflation that will continue to crush consumer confidence into the summer.

While high gas prices hit consumers, expensive diesel has battered the industrial economy because it's the lifeblood of the nation's transportation system.
"Diesel is in everything ... the diesel price shock will be longer-lived because it will take time for systems to digest and pass through," Mark Finley, a fellow at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, told Bloomberg.
Domestic demand remains elevated as gasoline and diesel inventories are some of the lowest in years or on record. East Coast diesel inventories recently hit a new record low. That has sent prices to a record high, with a $2 spread over gasoline prices. Diesel tends to be 50 cents to $1 above gas prices in normal times, though today's spread reflects very tight supplies.

On Tuesday, President Biden will deliver a speech to the American people about the spike in inflation that has pushed consumer prices to more than 8%. According to Reuters, he's not expected to deliver new policies to quell inflation but rather blast Republicans for not having a plan to fight inflation.

Food and gasoline prices have soared so much in the last year (well before Russia invaded Ukraine), then hyperinflated after the invasion, that consumers are rapidly adjusting their lifestyles. A Yahoo/Maru Public Opinion survey found that 66% of vehicle owners or households have made "significant changes to their driving patterns."

To deflect blame, the Biden administration has used every trick to scapegoat inflation. They routinely blame Russia but fail to express to the American people that inflation was already at four-decade highs before the invasion of Ukraine. In fact, inflation is derived from the massive expansion of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet and the federal government helicopter dropping stimulus checks during the pandemic.

Democrats are in trouble come midterms as their inability to quell inflation gives Republicans an edge. The latest CNN poll conducted by SSRS shows that the economy is the top issue on voters' minds. Half of all respondents said it was the most important issue (not abortion).
So who does the Biden admin blame this time for rising gas prices?


TB Fanatic

Rioters Burn Sri Lanka Leaders’ Homes Amid Economic Crisis
Over 50 homes belonging to Sri Lankan politicians were torched in a night of deadly unrest

May 10, 2022

Rioters Burn Sri Lanka Leaders’ Homes Amid Economic Crisis

In Sri Lanka, the nation’s military has been authorized to use deadly force after a night of unrest left at least eight dead. A worsening economic crisis fueled by a decline in tourism, debt defaults and global supply chain issues led to rioting that saw the homes of multiple Sri Lankan politicians burned to the ground.

Demonstrators are calling for the resignation of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa over the island’s worst economic crisis in history. On Monday, his brother, Mahinda Rajapaksa resigned from his post as prime minister after violent clashes erupted in the streets.

The resignation failed to stop the violence, which continued throughout the night. At least eight people were killed while Sri Lankan security forces have been ordered to shoot looters on sight.

The government ordered troops to open fire on anyone looting public property or causing “harm to life.”

Tens of thousands of troops have since been ordered to patrol the country’s largest cities. In addition, a nationwide curfew has been extended to Thursday morning in a bid to quell the unrest.

More than 50 houses belonging to politicians were burned overnight, including the home of former Prime Minister Rajapaksa in the nation’s capital of Colombo. At least one member of the Sri Lankan Parliament was reportedly killed on Monday, though the circumstances of his death remain unclear as of this time.

.55 min

1:38 min

Numerous pro-government officials, including Colombo’s police chief, were assaulted by angry protesters. The protesters were retaliating after pro-government demonstrators attacked an encampment in the nation’s Capital, where demonstrators had been peacefully camped out since April 8.

Sri Lanka has been gripped by the nation’s worst economic crisis in history since 2019. The crisis has been fueled by a number of factors but has accelerated as a result of global supply chain issues. Rising global costs of food and fuel have hit the import-heavy island nation quite hard.

In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic-related decline in tourism — which accounts for a sizable share of the nation’s GDP — has had devastating effects. Government policies also led to a major debt default that resulted in a Chinese company taking control of a major port. China has built a sizable share of the nation’s infrastructure under its Belt and Road initiative.

The crisis was further accelerated after President Rajapaksa banned the use of nonorganic fertilizers. This caused the nation’s rice output to decrease, which eventually caused a need to import the key crop.

Sri Lanka’s former Prime Minister, Mahinda Rajapaksa, was evacuated before his family’s ancestral home was burned to the ground. The Rajapaksa family rose to prominence after playing a key role in ending the nation’s long civil war.

Protesters have continued to call for the nation’s leader to step down.

.12 min


TB Fanatic

FCC Commissioner Tells Fox Business Biden’s Disinfo Board ‘Unconstitutional’

Jeffrey Clark
May 10th, 2022 3:16 PM

Nina Jankowicz
A senior government official excoriated the Department of Homeland Security's new Disinformation Governance Board as Orwellian, a threat to liberty and even a “dumpster fire.”

FCC commissioner Brendan Carr appeared on the May 9 edition of Fox News host Maria Bartiromo’s show, Mornings with Maria, and called for President Joe Biden’s Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) to dissolve as soon as possible. “Sometimes the threats to our liberty come dressed up in sheep’s clothing, but this wolf comes as a wolf,” said Carr, citing the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. “This is Orwellian; it’s un-American; it’s unconstitutional.

The very best time to shut this down was before the DHS ever announced it, the second best time is right now.”

6:58 min

“This type of board was always going to be a dumpster fire, uh, but the particular director that they chose to run it is just throwing more gas on it,” he added.

The infamous director of the DGB is none other than Nina Jankowicz, who was widely mocked for a TikTok video in which she sang a peppy show tune about the dangers of disinformation. She even christened herself the “Mary Poppins of disinformation” on Twitter.

The MRC further exposed the DGB’s leftist bent in an exclusive May 6 story that found board co-leader Jennifer Daskal had at least three close ties to liberal billionaire and Democrat megadonor George Soros.

Bartiromo jumped in and uncovered the hypocrisy behind leftist activist types like Jankowicz leading the charge against supposed disinformation:
“This woman Nina Jankowicz was among those people saying that Trump colluded with Russia, that Hunter Biden’s laptop was fake,” she said. “All of this is obvious that the disinformation is coming from that side.”
Jankowicz incorrectly labeled the Hunter Biden laptop story a “fairly tale” [stet] on Twitter and wrongly cited intelligence officials who claimed that the story was Russian disinformation. The existence of the laptop has since been confirmed by The Washington Post. She’s even on record pushing blatant misinformation about Trump allegedly colluding with Russia.

Carr agreed with Bartiromo’s assessment, saying that Jankowicz has a clear history of spreading misinformation herself. “This is a person” who claimed that “it’s really liberals that are being shadowbanned on the Internet, not conservatives,” Carr said. These aren’t isolated pinpricks.

This is a broader effort by this administration to drive dissent from the public square.”

Carr didn’t stop there. He emphasized that “there’s a broader game afoot,” pointing to a controversial DHS bulletin on terrorism from February. The DHS cried that foreign and domestic purveyors of “mis- dis- and mal-information” were threats to the security of the United States.


TB Fanatic

What You Need to Know About the WHO Pandemic Treaty
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 10, 2022
in Opinions

Pandemic Treaty Tedros

  • The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more
  • The WHO is not qualified to make global health decisions. As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission
  • More importantly, a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic response simply does not work, because pandemic threats are not identical in all parts of the world. Even people in the same region do not have identical risk and may not need or benefit from identical treatment
  • The WHO will accept two more days of public comment on the treaty, June 16 and 17, 2022, so prepare your statements now. The World Health Assembly will also vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations, May 22-28, 2022, which may also strip away more individual rights and liberties

The globalists that brought us the wildly exaggerated COVID pandemic in an effort to cement a biosecurity grid into place is now hard at work on the next phase of this New World Order.

The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more.

In “The Corbett Report”1,2 above, independent journalist James Corbett reviews what this treaty is, how it will change the global landscape and strip you of some of your most basic rights and freedoms. Make no mistake, the WHO pandemic treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.

A Backdoor to Global Governance
As noted by anti-extremism activist Maajid Nawaz in an April 28, 2022, Twitter post,3 the “WHO pandemic treaty serves as a backdoor to global empire.”

COVID-19, while potentially deadly to certain vulnerable groups, simply isn’t a valid justification for handing over more power to the WHO, especially in light of its many inexplicable “mistakes” in this and previous pandemics.

As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021,4 yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared.5 The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission.6

So, it seems clear that the effort to now hand over more power to the WHO is about something other than them being the most qualified to make health decisions that benefit and protect everyone.

It seems far more likely that the WHO is being installed as a de facto governing body for the global Deep State.7 Through the WHO, under the guise of biosecurity, the globalist cabal who seek to own everything and control everyone, will then be able to implement their wishes across the whole world in one fell swoop.

With this treaty in place, all member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates. If the WHO says every person on the planet needs to have a vaccine passport and digital identity to ensure vaccination compliance, then that’s what every country will be forced to implement, even if the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes.

As noted by Corbett, these negotiations are already well underway,8 and the treaty is expected to be fully implemented in 2024 — that is, unless the people of the world wake up to what’s happening and beat back this monstrosity.

WHO Likely Seeking to Monopolize Health Care Worldwide
Under the guise of a global pandemic, the WHO, the World Economic Forum (WEF) and all its installed leaders in government and private business, were able to roll out a plan that had already been decades in the making. The pandemic was a perfect cover.

In the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment.

Now, the WHO is gearing up to make its pandemic leadership permanent, extend it into the health care systems of every nation, and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part of The Great Reset.

While this is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general of the WHO is to push the world toward universal health coverage.9

And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”10 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,11,12 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.

Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.

The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed.

Without doubt, this can only result in needless suffering, not to mention the loss of individual freedom.

How the WHO Has Wielded Previous Pandemic Instruments
To give us an idea of how the WHO might end up misusing this new proposed international “instrument” on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, we can look at the International Health Regulations (IHR),13 which the U.S. signed on to in 2005.

The IHR is what empowered the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).14 This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts.

As noted by Corbett, the IHR allows the unelected director-general of the WHO to simply declare a PHEIC and, suddenly, all member states have to dance to his tune. It basically grants the WHO dictatorial powers over health policy.

PHEICs have included the phony H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2009, the inconsequential Zika outbreak in 2016, the overhyped Ebola outbreak in 2019, and, of course, the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020. All of these PHEICs were poorly handled and the WHO was criticized as inept and corrupt15 in their wake.

So, to summarize, through the IHR, the WHO has already been significantly empowered to dictate global health policy with regard to pandemics, and they used that power to bamboozle the nations of the world into spending billions of dollars on countermeasures, especially drugs and vaccines, that didn’t work very well.

In that sense, the WHO is really just another wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Big Pharma collaborators make billions on the taxpayers’ dime, while the people of the world are left to suffer the consequences of fast-tracked vaccines. Its handling of the COVID pandemic in particular has been unprecedentedly bad, as they were behind the withholding of early treatment with safe medicines worldwide.

As noted by ivermectin advocate Dr. Tess Lawrie,16 the WHO has also claimed the mRNA shots as safe as conventional vaccines, which is nowhere near the truth. Most all available data prove they are the most dangerous drugs ever created. Why would anyone expect the WHO to become less corrupt if given even more power and control?

IHR Amendments May Also Restrict Rights and Freedoms
Now, the IHR overrode and superseded the U.S. Constitution from the start, but in January 2022, the U.S. also submitted regulatory amendments17 that will give the WHO even more power to restrict your rights and freedoms.

May 22 through 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly will gather and vote on these amendments to the IHR and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law. These submitted amendments are in addition to the WHO pandemic treaty currently under discussion. As reported by Health Policy Watch, February 23, 2022:18

“Washington wants to fast track a series of nitty-gritty, but far-reaching changes in the existing International Health Regulations that govern WHO and member state emergency alert and response — for consideration at this year’s World Health Assembly, 22-28 May.

The U.S. proposal19 for major IHR rule changes, obtained by Health Policy Watch, has been a topic of discussion in a series of closed-door meetings of WHO member states, which are considering ways to reform the existing IHR, as well as advancing a whole new WHO convention or other international instrument20 on pandemic prevention and response …

The U.S. is expected to lead a parallel track of tightly-paced ‘informal’ member state negotiations to reach consensus on an IHR reform resolution for approval at this year’s 75th WHA [World Health Assembly] …”

The “new WHO convention or other international instrument” mentioned here refers to the WHO treaty currently under discussion. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in December 2021,21 for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty. And, as mentioned, this INB has begun that work.

However, as noted by Corbett, this is only the second time in the WHO’s history that an INB has been established. The first one was the INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control,22 22 years ago. So, this is not a well-established process, and it’s hard to predict how it will play out.


TB Fanatic
Part 2 of 2

Bill Gates Builds GERM Team for the WHO

Another clue about what the WHO intends to do with more power comes from its primary funder, Bill Gates. Gates recently announced he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, which he would like to be called the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team.

This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and “decide when they need to suspend civil liberties, force populations to wear masks and close borders,” The Counter Signal reports.23

Of course, Gates is also the largest funder of the WHO (when you combine the donations from both his foundation and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance). This and other relationships speak volumes about the corruption still ruling the WHO. At the end of the day, Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate to the world what they must do to make Gates a ton of money. As noted by The Counter Signal:24

“Gates’ announcement of the GERM team coincides with the World Health Organization’s drafting of a global pandemic treaty … In the future, the pandemic treaty will not only ensure that member states abide by International Health Regulations but will also put the WHO in the driver’s seat, so to speak. Member states, including the US and Canada, will take their orders directly from the organization. As Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis explains:

‘The treaty includes 190 countries and would be legally binding. The treaty defines and classifies what is considered a pandemic, and this could consist of broad classifications, including an increase in cancers, heart conditions, strokes, etc. If a pandemic is declared, the WHO takes over the global health management of the pandemic.

Of even more concern, if this treaty is enshrined, the WHO would be in full control over what gets called a pandemic. They could dictate how our doctors can respond, which drugs can and can’t be used, or which vaccines are approved. We would end up with a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire world … A one-size-fits-all response to a health crisis doesn’t even work across Canada, let alone the entire globe’ …

It isn’t unreasonable to assume that the GERM team, as a new branch of the WHO, would oversee making sure member states comply with the pandemic treaty after the draft is finalized and member states sign-on.

The next question, then, is how the WHO and Bill Gates would be able to monitor every individual in every country to determine whether enough people are sick to justify locking a region down.

To this end, the WHO has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system,
25 with plans to link every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID … Thus, there will be one pandemic treaty, one GERM team, one global vaccine passport, and one World Health Organization to monitor every person on the planet.”

Under WHO Control, Vaccine Passports Are a Given
Indeed, while countries around the world have scrubbed their COVID measures and backed away from vaccine passports, the WHO is still moving ahead with a global vaccine passport program.26

So, if the WHO is given the authority to dictate biosecurity rules for the world, you can bet they’ll insist on vaccine passports with built-in digital identity and readiness for a centralized programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC). As reported by the Western Standard:27

“The WHO fully intends to provide support to its 194 member states to facilitate the implementation of the digital verification technology for countries’ national and regional verification of vaccine status.

‘COVID-19 affects everyone. Countries will therefore only emerge from the pandemic together. Vaccination certificates that are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable build trust. WHO is therefore supporting member states in building national and regional trust networks and verification technology.

The WHO’s gateway service also serves as a bridge between regional systems. It can also be used as part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based records,’ said Garrett Mehl, unit head of the WHO’s Department of Digital Health and Innovation, on Deutsche Telekom’s website.”

Can We Stop the International Pandemic Treaty?
The question now is, can we stop this “international pandemic instrument” that the WHO is seeking? With short notice, the WHO announced it would accept public comment on the treaty for a total of five days.28 The World Council for Health (WCH) was among the few that acted quickly enough to submit a comment in opposition of the treaty. Lawrie delivered the WCH’s submission.29
The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society … It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of prime importance. ~ Robert Clancy, Ph.D.
In an April 26, 2022, update on Substack, Lawrie wrote:30

“Despite the lack of notice, many grassroots organizations did what they could to spread the word and the World Council for Health’s #stopthetreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people. Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns. So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day.”

One person who missed the deadline was professor Robert Clancy, a leading clinical immunologist in Canada. He sent the comment he would have wanted to submit to Lawrie, who included it in her post:31

“The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society. I am in receipt of the World Council for Health response, and the superbly summarized view by Dr. Tess Lawrie. These concerns reflect the ‘across the board’ view of most Australian doctors …

The failure to understand the restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal infection and the dangers of accumulated suppression that follows mindless booster programs, and failure to interrogate the massive databases regarding adverse events of genetic vaccines are but two of the serious mistakes perpetuated by the WHO …

It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of prime importance.

The rule of science and the rule of the doctor-patient relationship must determine any response to a pandemic, and current experience where the rule of the narrative has so distorted disease outcomes — supported by the WHO — must make very clear the foolishness of rewarding incompetence and corruption with even greater powers.

I write this as the most experienced Clinical Immunologist in Australia, and a leading research scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a focus on ‘host-parasite relationship.’ Professor Robert Clancy AM FRS(N) MB BS BSc(Med) PhD DSc FRACP FRCP(A) FRCP(C)”

Make Your Voice Heard in June
While many, like Clancy, didn’t get a chance to participate, the WHO has announced it will allow for two more days of public comment, June 16 and 17, 2022. As noted by Lawrie:32

“Please also be aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, to be voted on this May at the World Health Assembly.

Like the pandemic treaty, this is another move to seize greater powers and override the sovereign laws of individual nations. Some say this is more significant than the pandemic treaty: if voted in, it means the loss of our sovereignty from this November. James Roguski has written extensively about this on his Substack.33

There seems to be a concerted effort by the WHO and its controllers to attack our sovereignty from all angles. It is important we make it clear that we do not recognize the WHO as an authority over us and that we will not tolerate this abuse of power.

We are sovereign and will not be bound by the undertakings of corrupt officials who pretend to act on our behalf when signing away the inherent rights of the World’s People. They do not act for us and we will not be bound.”

I encourage you to make plans to have your voice heard June 16 and 17, 2022. Unfortunately, the WHO has not yet released any submission details. Your best bet right now is to sign up for the WCH’s newsletter. The last time, they issued links and instructions on how to submit your comment, and are sure to do the same for the June submission window. You can subscribe at the bottom of this page, or on the WCH’s home page.

To block the IHR amendments at the May 2022 World Health Assembly, we need to flood our respective delegations with opposition. A list of U.S. delegates can be found in Roguski’s Substack article, “Speaking Truth to Power.”

For contact information for other nations’ delegates, I would suggest contacting the regional office and ask for a list (see “Regions” in the blue section at the bottom of the World Health Assembly’s webpage). It’s also possible that the WCH will publish guidance on it, so be sure to sign up for their newsletter.


TB Fanatic

Naomi Wolf on China, WHO, and Bill Gates: “There Has Been an Attack on the American Homeland”

by Two Mikes
May 10, 2022

Naomi Wolf: There Has Been an Attack on the American Homeland 42:53 min
“Listening to Two Mikes will make you smarter!” – Gov Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr
Today, the Two Mikes spoke with the famous feminist and author Naomi Wolf about the ongoing destruction of the United States by the bipartisan governing elite, the media, and Big Tech.

“People need to wake up to the fact that there has been an attack on the American homeland,” she said. “It’s just not like big explosions. It’s not like the Twin Towers. It’s stealthier.”

Ms. Wolf is a graduate of Yale and earned a Ph.D. from Oxford University. She has been a prolific author and in recent years has charted the shattering of the American Constitution in a series of books:
  • The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot (2007)
  • Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries (2008), and her new, about to be released book,
  • The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, Covid-19, and the Human (All Seasons Press, 31 May 2022).
Ms. Wolf also is the chief executive of Daily Clout, a successful civil tech company, which focuses on keeping Americans alert to new dangers to their liberty that are found in the bills and other actions of the federal and state governments.

The organization also now has 2,500 researchers pouring through the released Pfizer paper pertaining to the lethal non-vaccine it produced. Ms. Wolf said Americans must wake-up and see that America is being ruled by mandates — which they have no legal requirement to obey — and not by law. The current and earlier administrations would never be able to get laws to permit their unconstitutional actions through Congress, and so they have just skipped the Congress and ruined the country with mandates.

She drew special attention to the World Health Organization (WHO) Congress that meets in late May 2022 to consider a treaty that would give the WHO power that supersedes that of the U.S. government and, indeed, America’s sovereignty, as well as that of all other nation-state governments if another pandemic strikes. Biden may well sign the treaty and not refer it to the U.S. Senate for ratification and thereby put another noose around America’s neck, just as Obama did with the Paris Climate Accord.

“I also talk about the role of the Chinese Communist Party,” she continued. “They’ve been buying up or influencing local government, local state legislatures, buying up courts, creating institutes on college campuses.”

The The Bodies of Others is about how we came to the harrowing civilizational crossroads at which we find ourselves — engaged in a war against vast impersonal forces with limitless power over our lives and which threaten the freedoms we have always taken for granted.

In her most provocative book yet, Dr. Naomi Wolf shows how these forces — from Big Tech and Big Pharma to the CCP and our oligarchical elites — seized upon two years of COVID-19 panic in sinister new ways, to not only undermine our Republic but to fundamentally reorient human relations.

Their target is humanity itself. Their end goal is to ensure that our pre-March 2020 world is gone forever. Irretrievable. To be replaced with a world in which all human endeavor, all human joy, all human fellowship, all human advancement, all human culture, all human song, all human drama, all worship, all surprise, all flirtation, all celebration, is behind a digital paywall.

A world in which we will all have to ask technology’s permission to be human. But we, the people of the world, did not vote to abandon our old systems and destroy our old ways so absolutely they could never be recovered. And Wolf shows how, against overwhelming odds, we still might win.

Ms. Wolf’s website:


TB Fanatic
5:15 min

SHTF As Diesel Shortage About To Hit At Largest Truck Stop Chain / Truckers Prepare

May 11, 2022

The Economic Ninja

SHTF As Diesel Shortage About To Hit At Largest Truck Stop Chain / Truckers Prepare. We not only have rising Fuel prices but now a possible diesel shortage that can cripple the supply chain. Even if you are part of the van life you may want to go fuel up today just incase this is really happening.


TB Fanatic
COVID-19 And The Global Predators: We Are The Prey 9:47 min

COVID-19 And The Global Predators: We Are The Prey (Dr. Peter Breggin)
Bannons War Room Published May 11, 2022

(Breggin: Human nature to have elites wanting power, but now add technology. Corporates have paid lip service to Klaus Schwab with stakeholder capitalism. Billionaires organizing and controlling special interest groups. Familiar human pattern, but now we have amazing ways to communicate, super computers, AI and the organization of data. Organizing all of these interests around the WEF leadership.

Bannon: What would you recommend our audience do to stop this?

Breggin: I think they should support your efforts in getting to Congressmen and Senators to shame Biden Admin on giving away our sovereignty in this vote on Amendments. It has to be the biggest issue: sovereignty. There have to be emergency Congressional hearings on these Amendments.

He thinks the Amendments will pass, but then there are 6 months in which individual members can withdraw. But we have to immediately start fighting the treaties. That is where Tedros announced where WHO would be strengthened as the leading and directing authority on global health - "at the center of global health architecture." They want to be in charge of all world health.

Behind it all, there is a movement to sap the wealth and strength of ordinary countries and ordinary people - to shrivel what is good in humanity by sucking the life out of it. This has been going on for a long time, but has gotten worse since COVID 19, the World Bank and the IMF. All of the big institutions aim to make the elite more powerful and more wealthy.

We need to reverse this process get back to a government for the individual - get back to Republic with a Constitutional democracy where the mob and elites don't middle class gets a chance to thrive. These people don't even talk about the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. It is forbidden.

Sign petition here: What the WHO…? | Stand for Health Freedom
Last edited:


TB Fanatic

Biden Handing Over U.S. Sovereignty to WHO
by Peter Breggin MD and Ginger Ross Breggin

Originally posted to America Out Loud May 4, 2022 | Feature 1, Healthcare, Politics, World

Please take seriously the severity of this existential threat to everything free people hold dear. Do everything in your power to pass this report on to others and to find ways to communicate with and to influence people to stop empowering WHO to take over our national sovereignty and freedom.

On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate control over America’s healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty, will be delivered for a vote to the World Health Organization’s governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).

This threat is contained in new amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, proposed by the Biden administration, that are scheduled as “Provisional agenda item 16.2” at the upcoming conference on May 22-28, 2022.1

These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.

If passed, the Biden Administration’s proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.’s 193 member nations, all of whom belong to WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population.2

These regulations are a “binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”3 U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.

How It Became Official

On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations.4 The U.S. amendments cross out a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…”5 By eliminating that, and other clauses (see below), all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will.

The amendments would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation’s alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes. The power to declare health emergencies is a potential tool to shame, intimidate, and dominate nations. It can be used to justify ostracism and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation.

Although sponsored by an American administration, WHO’s most significant use of this arbitrary authority to declare national emergencies will be used against the United States if our government ever again dares to take anti-globalist stands as it did under the Trump administration.

How Much Time Do We Have to Stop the Amendments?

The contents of the proposed amendments were not made public until April 12, 2022,6 leaving little time to protest before the scheduled vote. As noted, the amendments are scheduled and almost certainly will be enacted May 22-28, 2022.

The existing WHO regulations then provide for an 18-month grace period during which a nation may withdraw its “yes” vote for amendments, but the current proposed amendments would reduce that opportunity to six months. If the U.S.-sponsored amendments are passed, a majority of the nations could, in the next six months, change their individual votes and reverse the approval. But this is a much more difficult proposition than stopping the whole process now.

We must act now to prevent the passage of the amendments, including putting sufficient pressure on the United States to withdraw them from consideration. If that fails, and the amendments are approved at the May meeting of the WHO governing body, we must then make the effort to influence a majority of the nations to change their votes to “no.”
Without Organized Resistance, the Amendments Will Definitely Pass

On January 26, 2022, the same U. S. Permanent Mission to the United Nations in Geneva sent a one-page memo to WHO confirming that the amendments had been sent. It also contained a brief report by the same Loyce Pace, Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs HHS.7 Most importantly, the memo listed all the nations backing the U.S. amendments. The size and power of the group guarantee that the amendments will be passed if unopposed by significant outside pressure.

Here are the 20 nations, plus the European Union, listed by the U.S. as supporting the amendments:

Albania, Australia, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, India, Jamaica, Japan, Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Peru, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Member States of the European Union (EU).

The European Union, a globalist organization, has been among the biggest backers of increasing WHO’s global power. The EU includes the following 27 Western nations:

Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden.

That’s a total of 47 nations supporting the U.S.-authored amendments. All of them have endorsed empowering WHO to declare a possible or potential health emergency or crisis within any nation despite its objections and refusal to cooperate. To repeat, these amendments will pass unless American citizens, as well as citizens worldwide, mount a very strong opposition.

Defining “Health” and WHO’s Domain of Authority

According to the Foreward to WHO’s regulations, there is no specific limit to what constitutes a health emergency, and it is certainly not limited to pandemics. WHO’s domain includes:8

a scope not limited to any specific disease or manner of transmission, but covering “illness or medical condition, irrespective of origin or source, that presents or could present significant harm to humans…

WHO’s powerful reach is also defined by the number of other organizations it is authorized to cooperate with once it has declared an emergency or health crisis: “other competent intergovernmental organizations or international bodies with which WHO is expected to cooperate and coordinate its activities, as appropriate, include the following: United Nations, International Labor Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Civil Aviation Organization, International Maritime Organization, International Committee of the Red Cross, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, International Air Transport Association, International Shipping Federation, and Office International des Epizooties.”9

The Preamble to the WHO Constitution (separate from the International Health Regulations) summarizes WHO’s concept of what is included under its mandate of improving, guiding, and organizing world health:10

WHO remains firmly committed to the principles set out in the preamble to the Constitution

  • Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
  • The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.
  • The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent on the fullest cooperation of individuals and States.
  • The achievement of any State in the promotion and protection of health is of value to all.
  • Unequal development in different countries in the promotion of health and control of diseases, especially communicable diseases, is a common danger.
  • Healthy development of the child is of basic importance; the ability to live harmoniously in a changing total environment is essential to such development.
  • The extension to all peoples of the benefits of medical, psychological, and related knowledge is essential to the fullest attainment of health.
  • Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.
  • Governments have a responsibility for the health of their peoples which can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social measures.
Given WHO’s assessment of the breadth of its health concerns, mandates, and goals — almost any kind of problematic situation that affects the people of a nation could be considered a health problem. Indeed, under WHO’s approach, it would be difficult to find any important national issue that was not a potential health problem. With the imminent passage of the American-sponsored amendments to the International Health Regulations, WHO will have free reign for using these expansive definitions of health to call a crisis over anything it wishes in any nation it desires.

WHO’s Sweeping New Powers

The sweeping new powers will be invested in the Director-General of WHO to act on his own. The Director-General is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, commonly known as Tedros. Tedros, the first non-physician director-general of WHO, is an extremely controversial Marxist activist and politician from Ethiopia installed by the Chinese Communist Party. Despite the fact that his role as the cover-up apologist for the Chinese Communists at the onset of COVID-19, this “dear friend of Anthony Fauci” was re-elected without opposition in 2022 to a second five-year term.11 His original election in 2017, followed by his re-election without opposition in 2022, is an ominous display of Chinese Communist influence over WHO,12 which makes further empowering the U.N. agency extremely dangerous.

Under the new regulations, WHO will not be required to consult with the identified nation beforehand to “verify” the event before taking action. This requirement is stricken by the U.S. amendments (Article 9.1). The amendments require a response in 24 hours from the identified nation, or WHO will identify it as “rejection” and act independently (Article 10.3). If the identified nation “does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO shall … immediately share with the other State Parties the information available to it…” (Article 10.4).

Indicating the breadth of WHO’s scope of power, the agency will be given the right to involve multiple other U.N. agencies, including those related to food and agriculture, animal health, environmental programs, “or other relevant entities” (Article 6.1). This, too will not require the permission of the identified nation. The targeted nation is also required to send to WHO any relevant genetic sequence data. And as we have seen, the Foreward to these regulations presents a much larger array of potential collaborating agencies.
Under the proposed regulations, WHO itself would develop and update “early warning criteria for assessing and progressively updating the national, regional, or global risk posed by an event of unknown causes or sources…” (New article 5). Notice that the health-endangering event may be so nonspecific as to have “unknown causes or sources.” Thus, Tedros and any future Director-Generals of WHO will be given unrestricted powers to define and then implement their interventions.

The proposed regulations, in combination with existing ones, allow action to be taken by WHO, “If the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these Regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring…” (Article 12.2). That is, Tedros need only “consider” that a “potential or actual” risk is occurring.

Part 1 of 2


TB Fanatic
Part 2 of 2

Global Supporters of WHO

WHO is not a global powerhouse by itself. Early in the pandemic, it acted as a front group for the international exploiters of humanity, whom we describe in our new book COVID-19 and the Global Predators. In particular, it made certain the Chinese Communists could hide the seriousness of the pandemic while spreading to the world on passenger airplanes from its major cities, including Wuhan itself. We have already noted and documented that the Chinese Communist Party and Xi Jinping have enormous influence over WHO.

Even after Donald Trump slashed the U.S. contribution to WHO in February 2020, the U.S. remained the largest donor to WHO. On March 31, 2020, the U.S. contribution was $115.8 million, followed by China at approximately one-half that amount, followed by Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Brazil.13

Then in early July 2020, Trump notified Congress and the U.N. that it was formally withdrawing from WHO. Bill Gates quickly announced he was increasing his contribution from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to $250 million.14

After the Communist Chinese Party, Bill Gates probably has the most influence over WHO. In our book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, we describe in Chapter 15 how Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and the giant medical foundation Wellcome Trust created CEPI — The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. This became the center of global predatory activities in preparation for the anticipated pandemic. It brought together key U.S. agencies, including the FDA, CDC, NIAID, NIH, the U.N., WHO, giant pharmaceutical companies, banks, and multiple other sources of wealth and power.

In 2017, or earlier, CEPI made an agreement called a memorandum of understanding with WHO. CEPI then presented a PowerPoint presentation to WHO in July 2017, in effect dividing up the world between the Gates’ CEPI and WHO in the coming pandemic. Gates would handle the financing, supply, and distribution of the vaccines, and WHO would control and monitor the scientific and medical community. Among the stipulations of the PowerPoint, which the Gates-created foundation presented, was that the pharmaceutical companies would be reimbursed for all direct and indirect costs by the government for developing their high-speed manufacturing platforms.

WHO was highly effective during COVID-19 in implementing the aims of the global predators, led by the groups around Bill Gates and the Chinese Communist Party, in their organized assault and terror campaign against the Western democracies. This purposely resulted in the vast weakening of any potentially anti-globalist, freedom-oriented, patriotic nations, including the U.S., Great Britain, Australia, Canada, and others. That success may explain why the global predators chose WHO to now deliver a major and potentially lethal death blow to the sovereignty of the world’s nations.

Europeans Call for Additional Further Increases in WHO’s Power

There is a growing debate over further increasing the power of WHO to punish uncooperative or dissident nations.15 Some “have sounded the alarm about giving the WHO too much power at the expense of national sovereignty.” Some have voiced concern about China’s influence on WHO: “Not only has it increased its payment to the WHO in recent years, but it also enjoys a special relationship with its leader.”

But others are calling for increasing WHO’s ability to sanction non-compliant nations. Echoing recent plans publicized by the Biden administration, some nations are calling for “national and global coordinated actions to address the misinformation, disinformation, and stigmatization that undermine public health.” German Health Minister Jens Spahn has proposed “that countries that fail to follow up on their commitments to the WHO should face sanctions.” Tedros has said, “maybe exploring the sanctions may be important.”

Treaties with WHO: Another Enormous Threat to Sovereignty — With a Longer Timeline

Before we learned about this current and more immediate threat to U.S. sovereignty, we were focusing on WHO’s plans to begin making treaties with individual nations to take over their general healthcare structures, making WHO the guiding and central authority for the world’s healthcare. In addition to many radio, TV, and public appearances giving the details about this threat, we have written a column on America Out Loud, dated February 18, 2022, “Tedros Introduces Globalist Plan to Take Over World’s Health Systems.”16

If implemented, the treaties become an even greater threat than the amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, but we have more time to deal with the treaties than with the amendments.

We need to face that these American-sponsored amendments are a great step toward America voluntarily forfeiting its sovereignty to the New World Order or Great Reset — and that without strong opposition, the ratification of the amendments is a foregone conclusion. Our success or failure in stopping the ratification of these amendments will establish the pattern for the future, including WHO’s ongoing effort to make legally-binding treaties that rob nations of their sovereignty.
Why Would the U.S. Government Surrender Its Sovereignty

Why would the U.S. give away its sovereignty to other nations? In reality, that process has been going on at least since President Wilson’s failed attempt to get the Senate to approve U.S. membership in the League of Nations. It has escalated since World War II, often under the umbrella and authority of the United Nations, with which many global predators are enamored and use as the cover story for their predations. As documented in our book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators, Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab have both worked out cooperative agreements for their versions of the New World Order with the U.N.

President Biden has recently told the Business Round Table — the presidents and CEOs of the wealthiest 200 corporations in America — that they must lead the growing New World Order:17

“And now is a time when things are shifting. We’re going to — there’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it. And we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.”

John Kerry, the President’s climate czar, had announced that when Americans elected Biden, they voted for the Great Reset, whether they knew it or not.18

Discussion and Conclusions

The planning for these devastating U.S.-sponsored amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations has been so stealthy that it might have escaped attention except for the efforts of one individual, James Roguski. He was the first to recognize this threat, and on March 31, 2022, he published a report headlined, “WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution.”19 He also helped us by reviewing the material and this report with us. Fortunately, our courageous medical colleague Robert Yoho originally alerted us to Roguski’s work and its importance.20

We are facing an imminent threat to U.S. sovereignty by these legally-binding amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations that — without stiff opposition — will almost certainly be passed during the upcoming meeting of WHO’s governing body, the World Health Assembly, May 22-28, 2022. As noted earlier, there is a six-month grace period following approval of amendments during which countries may withdraw their approval, but a majority doing so seems highly unlikely. Right now, we must focus on preventing the WHA from approving the amendments.

We must immediately mount an international campaign, especially focused within America, to force the U.S. to withdraw these amendments before they come to a vote. Otherwise, America and the nations of the world will take a giant stride toward forfeiting national sovereignty to WHO and the U.N. In reality; they will be forfeiting their sovereign powers to the global predators who rule the U.N. and WHO, including the Chinese Communist Party and supporters of the Great Reset, like Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and giant foundations and corporations — all of whom benefit from weakening or destroying the sovereignty of the Western nations. Western civilization, and mainly the United States, is all that stands in strong opposition to the globalist takeover of the world, called the New World Order or the Great Reset.

Primary Author Peter R Breggin MD


1 /WHO/U.S.-proposed-amendments-to-WHO-International-Health-Regulations-with-cover-materials_1.pdf Top lefthand corner provides the date and proposal ID.

2 Members of the UN - United Nations

3 International Health Regulations (2005) (who. int) These are the original WHO International Health Regulations before the proposed amendments by the U.S.A. The Overview on this page (before going to the link to the Regulations) in the second sentence contains the statement about their legally binding nature.

4 /WHO/U.S.-proposed-amendments-to-WHO-International-Health-Regulations-with-cover-materials_1.pdf The document dated January 18, 2022, is found on pages 3-4, From the “Permanent Mission of the United States of America to the United Nations and Other International Organizations in Geneva.” It lists the Amendments as an enclosure, along with a “Letter from HHS Assistant Secretary Loyce Pace.”

5 /WHO/U.S.-proposed-amendments-to-WHO-International-Health-Regulations-with-cover-materials_1.pdf See p. 6 of the amendments, Article 9 (1.).

6 /WHO/U.S.-proposed-amendments-to-WHO-International-Health-Regulations-with-cover-materials_1.pdf The date is in the upper righthand corner.

7 Strengthening WHO Preparedness for and Response to Health Emergencies This is a One-page statement from U.S. to WHO about amendments. Lists supporting nations and DHHS support.

8 International Health Regulations (2005) ( Download the Regulations and go to the Foreward.

9 International Health Regulations (2005) ( International Health Regulations, Section on Revision Of The International Health Regulations, pp. 3-4.

10 Constitution of the World Health Organization

11 Controversial World Health Organization chief Tedros unopposed for second term. Even The New York Times had serious reservations about Tedros’ initial nomination, citing allegations of his covering up epidemics in his home country of Ethiopia: Candidate to Lead the W.H.O. Accused of Covering Up Epidemics (Published 2017)


13 Infographic: The Biggest Financial Contributors To The WHO


15 Swab, Petr. Proposal to Sanction Countries Disobeying WHO Pandemic Response Rules is Concerning: Author. The Epoch Times, April 14, Updated April 19, 2022. Swab’s report is the source for all the quotes in this section. is Proposal to Sanction Countries Disobeying WHO Pandemic Response Rules Is Concerning: Author



18 We have also checked a video of Kerry’s remarks.




TB Fanatic
Michael Rectenwald: “An open avowed plan to bring about a global reset of the world’s economy” 9:47 min

Michael Rectenwald: “An open avowed plan to bring about a global reset of the world’s economy”
Bannons War Room Published May 11, 2022

Michael Rectenwald: “An open avowed plan to bring about a global reset of the world’s economy”

"The Great Reset: Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics"
4:27 min

"The Great Reset: Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics"
RealAmericasVoice Published May 11, 2022
Author and Scholar Michael Rectenwald tell Steve Bannon about how China is the model for the "great reset" of the West.

(do not have time right now to watch)
Last edited:


TB Fanatic


TB Fanatic
"Something's Happening" With Reproductive Health While the CDC Dismisses It as "Female Hysteria" 2:57 min

"Something's Happening" With Reproductive Health While the CDC Dismisses It as "Female Hysteria"
ThingsThatMatter Published May 11, 2022

(Dr. Robert Malone: The lipids wrapping the gene therapy injected with the vax so it can enter the cells is abnormally collecting in the ovaries. As observed by NY Orthodox Jews where Rabbis closely monitor women's menses, this is effecting the menstrual cycle. [After the Holocaust, Hassidic Jews believe they have a mandate to have large families.] The CDC and others have been dismissing this as "female hysteria," Signal is growing that there are elevated spontaneous abortions, fetal death, passing clots when nursing a female child and issues of reproductive health.)


TB Fanatic
4:41 min
GOP Senators blame Biden policies for record high gas prices
One America News Network Published May 11, 2022
AAA reports gas prices have hit another record high. One America's John Hines caught up with GOP senators on Capitol Hill for their take.


TB Fanatic
The Shift Towards Brazen Totalitarianism: "Shut Up and Get in Line!" 1:28 min

The Shift Towards Brazen Totalitarianism: "Shut Up and Get in Line!"
The Vigilant Fox Published May 11, 2022

CJ Hopkins: "I feel like the overarching message of the last two years has been coming from power has been 'Shut up and get in line because we're the ones running things, and we can do this to you any time we want!' It's a more brazen totalitarianism than I've ever experienced from the West in my lifetime, and I can't help but see it as a message."

Full Video: ‘The Defender Show’ Episode 42: Orwell and Totalitarianism With Playwright CJ Hopkins - The Defender Show - CHD TV: Livestreaming Video & Audio