TheSearcher
Are you sure about that?
Looks like someone was bored and had a red pen. Decided to color a bit....
Spirograph.
Looks like someone was bored and had a red pen. Decided to color a bit....
GENEVA — Around the world and around the clock, scientists are trying to figure out what must be done to end the global health emergency unleashed by the new coronavirus. As the outbreak accelerates and spreads, dozens of countries have deployed increasingly stringent measures to try to contain the epidemic. Almost as quickly, in a herculean effort, an international network of researchers at data and wet laboratories has started gathering and analyzing data to unmask and disarm this perplexing new disease.
In magnitude, scale and velocity, this coronavirus, known as 2019-nCoV, is too big a problem for any one team to solve. On Monday, China reported its largest single-day death toll, 97, pushing the total reported dead worldwide to 910, with more than 40,500 people infected on four continents.
On Tuesday, I’m joining my fellow scientists at the World Health Organization headquarters for an urgent meeting to piece together, like a giant jigsaw puzzle, our findings so far. We need to get a clear view of the contagion and plug the holes in our understanding of the disease to inform public health decisions that affect hundreds of millions of lives. Science has a critical role to play in restoring calm.
Let’s start with what we know. The new coronavirus is a close cousin of viruses that infect bats. It jumped from an unconfirmed wild source (most likely bats) to an intermediate host, possibly pangolins or other small mammals, being sold as food at a market in Wuhan, a transportation and commercial hub in central China. The infected people unknowingly spread it to others, setting off the outbreak’s deadly journey. We now estimate that it takes about five to six days — possibly upward of 14 days — for someone to show symptoms after becoming infected.
What do we most need to know next? For epidemiologists who track infectious diseases, the most pressing concerns are how to estimate the lethality of the disease and who is susceptible; getting detailed information on how it spreads; and evaluating the success of control measures so far.
No. 1 is the “clinical iceberg” question: How much of it is hidden below the surface? Because the outbreak is still evolving, we can’t yet see the totality of those infected. Out of view is some proportion of mildly infected people, with minor symptoms or no symptoms, who no one knows are infected.
A fleet of invisible carriers sounds ominous; but in fact, an enormous hidden figure would mean many fewer of the infected are dying. Usually, simple math would determine this “case fatality” ratio: divide the total number of deaths by the total number of people infected. In an emerging epidemic, however, both numbers keep changing, and sometimes at different speeds. This makes simple division impossible; you will invariably get it wrong.
In 2003, during the early days of the SARS outbreak, the medical community got the math wrong. At first, we believed that case fatality hovered between 2 percent and 3 percent. It took two pages of longhand algebra, written in Oxford, England, coded into a computer in London and then applied to data from Hong Kong, to get it right. The actual case fatality for Hong Kong was staggering: 17 percent.
That’s not to suggest we’re facing as dire a scenario now. Several groups, including mine, are each using our own methods to calculate a preliminary estimate of the new virus’s lethality. If there’s near agreement among our findings, expected within the week, we’ll be more confident in describing the new coronavirus. Does it resemble the seasonal flu, SARS or one of the largest plagues in human history, the 1918-19 “Spanish flu” pandemic?
Knowing the number of people likely to die, or who get seriously sick or have zero symptoms, will help health authorities determine the strength of the response required. They can better estimate how many isolation beds, heart-lung machines and medicines, among other things, are needed.
Last month, to start understanding the severity of this illness, my team assisted Chinese experts in analyzing the initial 425 confirmed cases of infection. We learned that 65 percent of people had neither visited a market nor been exposed to another person showing pneumonialike symptoms, which implied, among other things, the possibility that some infected people don’t suffer from obvious symptoms — meaning the illness isn’t always severe.
Along with getting a grasp on the level of severity is figuring out susceptibility, or who is most at risk for infection. The data so far indicates that this would include older adults, the obese and people with underlying medical conditions. There are few reports of children becoming infected. But are they not showing symptoms, or are they immune? And could they infect others as silent carriers? We must study those under 18 to find out; the answers could help us fine-tune public health measures. For example, should schools in China and Hong Kong remain closed?
"DISPOSAL CREW" !!!
View attachment 182395
I think we've seen it before, but here's the link anyway:
Datagram (@datagram1) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Datagram (@datagram1). Permanently shadow banned. If you want to find out what the world is really like, This is the best information feed for you. Updated every day. United Kingdomtwitter.com
Plus this one:
View attachment 182396
What is her personality type?Last week I sent my sister, who lives in the Champaign/Urbana area a link to interview by Francis Boyle - a professor at U of I. She used to work at U of I and is very proud of that - so, I started the conversation asking if she knew of him and telling her a little bit about him - he wrote the US Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, etc... She didn't know him, but she said that U of I was filled with "heavy hitters." So, then I mentioned that he was VERY concerned about this coronavirus. So, immediately she reversed her stance and said that "The university was also known to hire and/or keep crazies, esp. ones who start off with good credentials. And then she told me that she had just listened to the interview (which was 30 minutes long - so, there's no way she listened to even a fraction of it) and passed it all off as fiction. It's so maddening!
Sounds, more to me, like they are saying, "We don't have a freaking clue what we are dealing with!"
BS on that..... he went to another government office, had a few of the staff dress up and then played to the cameras. There is no way he risked exposure to himself the GOD Emperor of China....
I betcha Howie isn’t eating Chinese.All I can say is if I wasn’t a germaphobe before this (which I was) I definitely am now.
I listened to NPR on the radio going to work this morning (my form of oppo research). They had a segment from Thailand where the jist was they didn't want Chinese tourists bringing china flu to their town and they should just stay away.ABC Nightly News with David Muir tonight led with the coronavirus and actually raised the level of alarm. At one point, Muir said that today's deaths in China "may just be the tip of the iceberg."
I'm not by any means advocating ABC news, but it can be interesting to see what the mainstream media is saying. Looks like they may be upping the alarm (Do they know that all hell is about to break loose? I guess we shall see).
This morning Fox news said "dozens of new victims on the cruise ship". If that is not deceptive reporting, I don't know what is! GRRRR!ABC Nightly News with David Muir tonight led with the coronavirus and actually raised the level of alarm. At one point, Muir said that today's deaths in China "may just be the tip of the iceberg."
I'm not by any means advocating ABC news, but it can be interesting to see what the mainstream media is saying. Looks like they may be upping the alarm (Do they know that all hell is about to break loose? I guess we shall see).
I remember that! And we thought you were kidding.I told you the mode of transportation was hookers.... I am happy to see some has finally acknowledged the fact......
I listened to NPR on the radio going to work this morning (my form of oppo research). They had a segment from Thailand where the jist was they didn't want Chinese tourists bringing china flu to their town and they should just stay away.
NPR playing that (xenophobic ) story in prime time told me that the MSM is about to start talking about this and the time for final obvious preps is closing quickly.
He did a half hour on it this morning. Lately it has been Ukraine, but I have a feeling as the corona virus continues to pick up he will spend more time on it.Is Beck covering the outbreak very much? If so I may have to start listening to him again.
I'd say that's part of it, but the extra days were tacked on to make people wary, scared, and malleable while TPTB continue to work the problem.
ABC Nightly News with David Muir tonight led with the coronavirus and actually raised the level of alarm. At one point, Muir said that today's deaths in China "may just be the tip of the iceberg."
I'm not by any means advocating ABC news, but it can be interesting to see what the mainstream media is saying. Looks like they may be upping the alarm (Do they know that all hell is about to break loose? I guess we shall see).
From what I have heard you only get sulfur dioxide from burning organic material. That would leave coal out wouldn't it?In one of the videos posted on this thread that I watched. They discussed that they might have turned off the scrubbers on the coal fired power plants to try and make the most of their limited supplies since transportation is shut down and no deliveries are being made. This would increase some of the emissions I think, but I am no expert.
From what I have heard you only get sulfur dioxide from burning organic material. That would leave coal out wouldn't it?
I hate to suggest that perhaps there is more than one strain in the wild. The "base" nCoV that causes the pneumonia variant and another that causes the sudden death variant. No Evidence, just thinking out loud.
The point of this quadratic regression on Chinese infection and death numbers as reported by the World Health Organization from the first official announcement through February 4 was the publication of this projection.
Hopefully some good news- a prophetic word from Hank Kunneman that God is going to have mercy on the U.S. I personally choose to shift to the happier timeline. YMMV.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuIOrjhAC-Y
Ok, so, do they just have the virus or are they sick? Did they get on the plane with or without the virus? Weren't they about to release those folks from quarantine? So if this person is infected, how many others are by now. Wow, this case holds a lot of questions.According to the source, the individual was aboard the first flight from Wuhan, China to Miramar last Wednesday.
The official says the individual is an adult. It’s unclear whether the patient is a man or a woman.
The individual was taken to the UC San Diego Medical Center for treatment.
The first flight from China landed at Miramar last Wednesday. A second plane arrived at the base later in the week.
First case of coronavirus confirmed in San Diego
The first case of coronavirus in San Diego was confirmed on Monday, with the patient reported to be in good condition at an area hospital.www.10news.com
I'd pray that he was a Prophet. And I can't disagree with the words spoken..... but the atire, his cuffs, striped shirt, everything about his clothing is suspect. The Prophet Hank does not resonate well either. But, hey, I pray he is.Hopefully some good news- a prophetic word from Hank Kunneman that God is going to have mercy on the U.S. I personally choose to shift to the happier timeline. YMMV.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuIOrjhAC-Y