CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Political interference at Health and Human Services (NIH, CDC, FDA, ASPR)
The U.S. General Accounting Office finds evidence of political interference and a lack of reporting mechanisms in the handling of the pandemic
Robert W Malone MD, MS
21 hr ago



Bombshell: U.S. General Accounting Office Finds Evidence of Political Interference Occurring at CDC & FDA During COVID-19. Trial Site News reports (Behind a Paywall)

The US GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE: REPORT TO CONGRESS documents that the FDA, CDC, NIH and ASPR have been compromised during the pandemic by allowing political interference.

Trial Site News has also documented “that ‘political interference’ associated with scientific reports and possibly even tampered with study results to skew or bias the results has been ongoing throughout the pandemic (see the trial site news article for more details).”

Read the GAO Report Here

The 37-page GAO report issued a warning that American federal agencies who have managed the pandemic public policy response (including vaccine and drug development) don’t have any mechanism to stop political interference. That they also don’t have reporting mechanisms for whistleblower allegations involving political interference. Furthermore, despite the leadership of these organizations (CDC, FDA, NIH and ASPR) asserting that there have been no political interference during the pandemic, an investigation by the GAO found multiple examples of such within the agencies.

FROM THE “US GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE (GAO): REPORT TO CONGRESS”:


SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY HHS Agencies Need to Develop Procedures and Train Staff on Reporting and Addressing Political Interference

What GAO Found:
The four agencies GAO reviewed do not have procedures that define political interference in scientific decision-making or describe how it should be reported and addressed. These agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR).
The absence of specific procedures may explain why the four selected agencies did not identify any formally reported internal allegations of potential political interference in scientific decision-making from 2010 through 2021. Through semistructured interviews and a confidential hotline, employees at CDC, FDA, and NIH told GAO they observed incidents that they perceived to be political interference but did not report them for various reasons. These reasons included fearing retaliation, being unsure how to report issues, and believing agency leaders were already aware…
All four selected agencies—CDC, FDA, NIH, and ASPR—train staff on some scientific integrity-related topics, such as public health ethics, but only NIH includes information on political interference in scientific decision-making as part of its scientific integrity training (see figure).”​

 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Higher COVID-19 death rates in the southern U.S. due to behavior differences
by Georgetown University Medical Center
April 28, 2022

During the pre-Omicron phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, regions of the U.S. had markedly different mortality rates, primarily due to differences in mask use, school attendance, social distancing, and other behaviors. Had the entire country reacted to the pandemic as the Northeast region, more than 316,000 deaths might have been avoided, 62% of those avoidable deaths being in the South.

The study, by Georgetown University's School of Nursing & Health Studies researchers, appeared April 28, 2022, in PLOS ONE.

Excess mortality, which helps account for avoidable deaths from a new disease or situation, is defined by the difference between total current deaths and deaths expected based on earlier time period, usually the previous decade or so. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) calculates these numbers weekly. For this study, the CDC excess mortality data were analyzed for the period between January 3, 2020, to September 26, 2021. For regional comparison purposes, areas of the country were broken down into the Northeast, Midwest, South and West.

"Our goal was to carefully examine regional differences in COVID-19 death rates based on reliable statistical data," says Michael Stoto, Ph.D., professor of Health Systems Administration and Population Health at the School of Nursing & Health Studies and corresponding author of the study. "Our study is the first to quantify avoidable deaths and confirm that both COVID-19 deaths and avoidable deaths disproportionately occurred in the South."

The investigators found that regional differences in COVID-19 mortality rates have persisted throughout the pandemic. The southern part of the United States has had higher mortality rates than the rest of the U.S. since the start of summer in 2020. Since October 2020, 48% of COVID-19 deaths were in the South, which makes up 38% of the population, pointing to disproportionate outcomes regionally.

The researchers also determined that between January 2020 and September 2021 there were 895,693 excess deaths associated with COVID-19, which is 26% more than reported by other experts who track disease. Although the official total neared on one million deaths in the U.S due to COVID-19 by late April 2022, based on this undercount the scientists believe that threshold was actually passed at the beginning of 2022.

These estimates of undercounts are important because most studies have looked at excess mortality at the state and county level in the U.S., but because of small population sizes, the studies have not examined patterns over time. Some earlier studies explored the relationship between COVID-19 mortality and age, education, and other factors as well as vaccine uptake, party affiliation, and other factors. But most studies have used reported COVID-19 deaths rather than excess deaths, as compared to what Dr. Stoto and collaborators have done, and may not be as statistically reliable.

"This is one of a series of planned studies to look carefully at the response to COVID-19 in the U.S. and other countries and to learn from the experience in order to strengthen preparedness for future potential outbreaks," says Stoto. "Our team has also looked at testing and surveillance, and other COVID-19 metrics to understand how communities have come together to effectively deal with the pandemic."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Genetic links revealed between severe COVID-19 and other diseases
by Public Library of Science
April 28, 2022


1651218768022.jpeg
While genes linked to severe COVID-19 were associated with established risk factors and adverse outcomes, including deep vein thrombosis, a significant subset of these genes had opposite associations with reduced risk of immune-mediated disorders such as psoriasis, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis. Credit: Anurag Verma, Katherine Liao, and Scott Damrauer (CC-BY 4.0, creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

A new analysis of data from the Veterans Affairs Million Veteran Program has uncovered genetic links between COVID-19 severity and certain medical conditions that are known risk factors for severe COVID-19. Anurag Verma of the Corporal Michael Crescenz VA Medical Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, and colleagues present these findings on April 28th in the open-access journal PLOS Genetics.

Some people with COVID-19 experience the disease more severely than others. Previous research has identified certain COVID-19. Particularly strong links were found for variants associated with venous embolism and thrombosis, as well as type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease—two known COVID-19 risk factors.

The analysis also found genetic links between severe COVID-19 and neutropenia for Veterans of African and Hispanic ancestry; these links did not appear for those of European ancestry.

Among respiratory conditions, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and chronic alveolar lung disease shared genetic links with severe COVID-19, but other respiratory infections and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) did not. Some variants associated with severe COVID-19 were also associated with reduced risk of autoimmune conditions, such as psoriasis and lupus. These findings highlight the need to carefully weigh various aspects of the immune system when developing new treatments.

Despite some limitations of the PheWAS method, these findings could help deepen understanding of COVID-19 and guide development of new treatments.

Verma concludes, "The study demonstrates the value and impact of large biobanks linking genetic variations with EHR data in public health response to the current and future pandemics. MVP is one of the most diverse cohorts in the US. We had a unique opportunity to scan thousands of conditions documented before the COVID-19 pandemic. We gained insights into the genetic architecture of COVID-19 risk factors and disease complication."

"One thing that stood out to us was the high number of immune-mediated conditions that shared genetic architecture with severe manifestations of COVID-19," coauthor Katherine Liao adds. "The nature of the associations brought to light how the SARS-CoV2 virus pushes on a pressure point in the human immune system and its constant balancing act of fighting infection while maintaining enough control so that it does not also become an autoimmune process, attacking self."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Study tracks COVID-19 infection dynamics in adults
by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
April 28, 2022

A team led by scientists at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign tracked the rise and fall of SARS-CoV-2 in the saliva and nasal cavities of people newly infected with the virus. The study was the first to follow acute COVID-19 infections over time through repeated sampling and to compare results from different testing methodologies.

The findings are reported in the journal Nature Microbiology.

"We capture the most complete, high-resolution, quantitative picture of how SARS-CoV-2 replicates and sheds in people during natural infection. There are no other data like this," said U. of I. microbiology professor Christopher B. Brooke, who led the research with microbiology and statistics professor Pamela P. Martinez and pathobiology professor Rebecca L. Smith. "The study sheds light on several aspects of infection that were poorly understood, that are important for both public health purposes as well as just fundamental biology."

The study grew out of the SHIELD: Target, Test, Tell initiative, the U. of I.'s COVID-19 response program, which began testing staff, students and faculty members twice per week in fall 2020. Illinois researchers realized that the testing data could be a treasure trove of information about the course of infection: for example, how fast different SARS-CoV-2 variants replicated, and how individuals differed in their ability to clear the infection. The team received Institutional Review Board approval to pursue such a study.

The National Institutes of Health stepped in to fund the effort to compare PCR tests, which amplify and detect viral RNA, with rapid antigen tests, which look for proteins associated with the virus. This funding made other aspects of the study possible.

Starting within 24 hours of an initial positive test, the team took daily nasal and saliva samples from adults who tested positive for COVID-19 infection. The 60 participants in the study ranged from 19 to 73 years old. The study followed each person up to 14 days.

Determining how long infected individuals may be shedding viable virus—in their saliva or nasal passages, for example—is key to understanding how the virus spreads and persists in a population, Brooke said. To do this, the team also used viral culture assays to measure the shedding of infectious virus in their samples.

"Just because you see a signal of virus by PCR or antigen tests doesn't mean that there's actually live virus there that could replicate and shed and transmit to someone else," Brooke said.

Ruian Ke, a collaborator at Los Alamos National Laboratory and first author of the paper, used a variety of mathematical models to help the team understand how the data may reflect underlying infection processes and identify factors influencing the course of infection.

The effort revealed that some individuals were shedding live virus for only a day or two, while others continued to shed the virus for up to nine days.

"Based on that finding, we predict that those people who are shedding virus for more than a week are going to be a much greater risk of transmission than someone who only has live virus detectable for a day or two," Brooke said.

"This is a very key finding," Martinez said. "People have observed that viral transmission is heterogenous, but most attribute those differences to individual behavior. We assume that superspreaders are less cautious or are in contact with more people. This shows that intrinsic infection dynamics also play an important role."

The researchers also discovered that viral genome loads—detectable with PCR technology—peaked much earlier in saliva samples than in nasal swabs.

This suggests "that saliva may serve as a superior sampling site for early detection of infection," the researchers wrote.

The scientists saw no meaningful differences in the infection dynamics of early circulating variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the alpha variant. This indicates that the alpha variant's higher transmissibility "cannot be explained by higher viral loads or delayed clearance," the researchers wrote.

The team saw no meaningful correlations between people's symptoms and the course of infection. While it is often assumed that those who have more symptoms are likely to be more infectious, that may not always hold true, Brooke said. The implications of this part of the research may be limited, however, by the fact that all the participants in the study were either asymptomatic or had mild symptoms and none were hospitalized.

"Overall, this study helps explain why some people are more likely to transmit SARS-CoV-2 than others," Brooke said.

The paper is titled "Daily longitudinal sampling of SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals substantial heterogeneity in infectiousness."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

South Korea to relax outdoor mask mandate as COVID-19 slows
by Kim Tong-Hyung
April 29, 2022

South Korea will ease its outdoor mask mandate starting next week as COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations continue to decline.

Starting Monday, people will only be required to wear a mask outdoors when participating in gatherings of more than 50 people or attending sports and cultural events with potentially large crowds, health authorities said in a briefing Friday. The mask mandate for indoors and public transport will also remain in place.

Health workers have diagnosed a daily average of around 63,000 new cases in the past seven days, including 50,568 in the latest 24 hours—a drop-off from mid-March when the country was reporting hundreds of thousands of infections each day at the height of an omicron-driven surge. As hospitalizations and deaths slow, less than 30% of the country's 2,800 intensive care units designated for COVID-19 patients are occupied.

South Korea had already removed much of its pandemic restrictions earlier this month, including a 10-person limit on private social gatherings, a midnight curfew at restaurants, coffee shops and bars and a ban on food consumption at movie theaters, concert halls and indoor sports venues.

Jeong Eun-kyeong, commissioner of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, said the weekslong decline in infections even with the easing of social distancing suggests that the country's outbreak is stabilizing. She said health authorities concluded it was safe to relax the mask mandate because the risk of transmissions is much lower outdoors and other countries didn't see a meaningful increase in infections after easing similar restrictions.

Jeong recommended that people still wear masks outdoors if they have symptoms like coughs or fever or are in crowded spaces like theme parks where it's hard for them to maintain at least a meter (3-foot) distance with others.

However, the office of President-elect Yoon Suk Yeol, who takes office in May 10, raised concern that the move to ease the mask mandate could be premature. Hong Kyung-hee, spokesperson of Yoon's presidential transition committee, said the committee had recommended the government to monitor virus trends for at least another month before deciding whether to relax the mask mandate.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Racial split on COVID-19 endures as restrictions ease in US
by Annie Ma and Hannah Fingerhut
April 29, 2022

Black and Hispanic Americans remain far more cautious in their approach to COVID-19 than white Americans, recent polls show, reflecting diverging preferences on how to deal with the pandemic as federal, state and local restrictions fall by the wayside.

Despite majority favorability among U.S. adults overall for measures like mask mandates, public health experts said divided opinions among racial groups reflect not only the unequal impact of the pandemic on people of color but also apathy among some white Americans.

Black Americans (63%) and Hispanic Americans (68%) continue to be more likely than white Americans (45%) to say they are at least somewhat worried about themselves or a family member being infected with COVID-19, according to an April poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

Throughout the pandemic, Black and Hispanic communities have experienced higher rates of illness and death from COVID, said Amelia Burke-Garcia, public health program area director at NORC. Those experiences have resulted in greater levels of stress, anxiety and awareness of the risks of catching COVID-19, she said, which means people of color are more likely to feel measures like mask mandates are needed.

"We've seen these trends endure throughout the entire pandemic," Burke-Garcia said. "What we're seeing now as mitigation measures are being rolled back is there's still great concern amongst Black Americans and Hispanic Americans around the risk of getting sick."

Seventy-one percent of Black Americans say they favor requiring face masks for people traveling on airplanes, trains and other types of public transportation. That's more than the 52% of white Americans who support mask mandates for travelers; 29% of white Americans are opposed. Among Hispanic Americans, 59% are in favor and 20% are opposed. The poll was conducted before a ruling by a federal judge scuttled the government's mask mandate for travelers.

In Indiana, Tuwanna Plant said she sees fewer and fewer people wearing masks in public, even though she said she has been diligent in always wearing one. Plant, who is Black, said she sees people treating the pandemic like it's over, and she wants the mask mandate to continue.

Plant, a 46-year-old sous chef, said she had some concerns about getting the vaccine and took every other precaution, such as cleaning and masking, to avoid getting sick but recently was hospitalized for COVID.

The experience scared her—she has a preexisting lung condition, and knew family members who died from COVID. She said she plans to get vaccinated as soon as she can.

"I called my children while I was in the emergency room," Plant said. "I didn't know ... if it was going to get better or worse, I didn't know. So it was the experience for me altogether."

1651219000510.jpeg
A new AP-NORC poll shows majorities of Black and Hispanic Americans are at least somewhat worried about themselves or family being infected with COVID-19, compared with fewer than half of white Americans.


Dr. Celine Gounder, an infectious disease specialist and epidemiologist and editor-at-large at Kaiser Health News, said people's lived experiences deeply shape how they perceive the pandemic. Anecdotes and personal experience can have a larger impact on behavior than numbers, she said, and people of color are more likely to have had negative experiences with health care prior to and during the pandemic.

While new medicines and vaccines have made it easier to treat COVID-19, Gounder said many people still face systemic barriers to accessing that medical care. Others risk losing their jobs or are unable to take time off if they do fall ill, she said, or cannot avoid things like public transit to reduce their exposures.

"When people argue that they don't have to mask on the plane, that means something very different for someone who has access to all of these new innovations than it does for somebody who has no health insurance, who struggles to care for an elderly parent and their children, who's maybe a single mom working in a job where she has no paid sick and family medical leave," Gounder said. "It's just a completely different calculation."

In January, an AP-NORC poll showed Black and Hispanic Americans were more likely than white Americans to feel certain things would be essential for getting back to life without feeling at risk of infection. For example, 76% of Black Americans and 55% of Hispanic Americans said it was essential for getting back to normal that most people regularly wear face masks in public indoor places, compared with 38% of white Americans.

Last month, an AP-NORC poll showed Black and Hispanic Americans, 69% and 49%, were more likely than white Americans, 35%, to say they always or often wear a face mask around others.

Lower support for mask mandates and other precautions among white Americans may also reflect less sensitivity towards what occurs in communities of color. In a 2021 study of mask wearing during the early part of the pandemic, researchers found that mask wearing among white people increased when white people were dying at greater rates in the surrounding community. When Black and Hispanic people were dying, mask usage was lower.

Berkeley Franz, a co-author of the paper, said that in addition to residential segregation that separates white people from communities of color, past research has shown that white people can display ambivalence towards policies that they believe mostly help people of color.

"Anti-Blackness is really pervasive and has tremendous consequences, both in terms of the policies that get passed, and what doesn't," Franz said. "White people can still have really racist actions without seeing themselves that way and understanding the consequences. It's largely below the surface and unintentional but has tremendous consequences in terms of equity."

Communities of color also have a different perception of risk from the pandemic than their white counterparts, said Michael Niño, a sociology professor at the University of Arkansas who co-authored a paper on race, gender and masking in the pandemic.

"Masking is something that is relatively cheap, it's effective, and it's something that can be easily done," he said. "It doesn't require any sort of governmental response. These broader histories of racism and sexism in the United States are most certainly shaping some of the patterns we're seeing."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Vaccination campaign messages often prove ineffective
by Technical University Munich
April 28, 2022

Conventional vaccination campaign messages often miss their targets. A study in eight European countries shows that information on the benefits of vaccines can even reduce the willingness to get immunized. The researchers also looked into the factors that influenced the impact of messages, including low health literacy. A further study provides indications of the relationship between trust in vaccines and their approval procedures.

Not many COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in Europe lived up to the hopes of the public health authorities. However, the results of past studies in various countries have yielded a mixed picture as to which communication strategies can increase vaccine uptake and which factors undermine certain messages. A team of the Technical University of Munich (TUM), the University of Trento and the London School of Economics and Political Science explored these questions in Bulgaria, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden and the UK.

During the intensive phase of the vaccination campaigns, in June 2021 (in April in Germany), more than 10,000 unvaccinated adults were initially provided online with general information on the available vaccines. Then they received one of three messages combining text and images or were assigned to a control group. Message 1 highlighted the efficacy of the available vaccines in reducing the risk of serious illness and death through COVID-19. Message 2 stressed the advantages of having a vaccination certificate, especially for travel. Message 3 presented the prospect of leisure-time activities without restrictions, for example restaurant and cinema visits, access to fitness studios and attendance at concerts. The participants were then asked whether they intended to be vaccinated against COVID-19 if given the opportunity during the following week.

Three messages effective only in Germany

The study, published in Science Advances, shows that the tested messages would be effective in boosting vaccination quotas only in Germany and, to a lesser extent, in the UK. In Germany the vaccination willingness was significantly higher in the three groups than in the control group. In the UK, the readiness was higher only when the message stressed the benefits of a vaccination certificate. In all other countries the messages were ineffective—or even produced results opposite to those intended: people in Spain and Italy, when informed of the reduced risk of illness through vaccines, were less likely to seek vaccination than the corresponding control groups.

Decisive factor: Health literacy

Using data mining methods, the research team was able to carry out detailed analysis of various associations between the message effectiveness and sociodemographic characteristics as well as the following factors: citizens' trust in their government, their literacy with regard to healthcare issues and the share of the population who believe in certain conspiracy theories. The scientists used existing surveys to obtain data on these factors (which are not to be seen as monocausal) for the various countries.

For all messages, the likelihood of achieving the desired effect was reduced in a country when the health literacy of the population was low. "This result surprised us," says Matteo M. Galizzi, a professor of behavioral science at the London School of Economics and Political Science. "We had thought that understandable and clearly visualized information on COVID-19 would lead to an improved understanding of the disease among people with little prior knowledge and thus to a greater vaccination willingness." In contrast, the study confirmed conjectures that citizens' trust in their own government would have a positive effect on vaccination intention.

Older people less receptive

Where there was relatively high prevalence of conspiracy theories, neither the message on health benefits nor that on the prospect of future leisure-time options produced significant successes. "The analysis shows that this strong disinformation can also explain the negative impact of health information in Spain and Italy," says Giuseppe A. Veltri, a professor in computational social science at the University of Trento.

The researchers saw differences between socio-economic groups. For example, men with low levels of educational attainment were more often convinced by the two messages highlighting advantages in everyday life and leisure time than men with the same profile in the control group. Among these men there was also a very pronounced effect in countries with a high level of trust in the government and low prevalence of conspiracy theories. Older people tended to be less receptive on the whole to all of the messages.

'Clearer differentiation in campaigns'

"During the pandemic, people often looked at other countries to see what was working better or worse. Our study showed that such comparisons have limited usefulness," says Prof. Tim Büthe, Chair of International Relations at TUM. "A more promising approach is to investigate the existing conditions in every country and then adapt the policy measures and communication strategies accordingly. Policy makers can use our findings to inform messaging for upcoming COVID-19 booster campaigns."

Janina Steinert, a professor of global health at TUM, who headed the study, says: "Messages encouraging people to get vaccinated should target the various groups more closely, both in terms of content and how they are communicated, for example via certain social media channels or with gender-based or age group-specific advertising. Where the public lacks trust in the government, individuals seen as role models by certain socio-economic groups can be chosen as communicators."

However, if a communication campaign has poor prospects of success due to several known barriers, the research team recommends shifting the focus to other measures. These might include concrete incentives or individually assigned vaccination appointments, which can only be actively objected to. "In the long term, all countries should develop their citizens' health literacy to improve the effectiveness of future vaccination campaigns," says Steinert.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Well-being program using singing can improve quality of life and breathlessness after COVID-19
by Imperial College London
April 28, 2022


1651219179878.jpeg
Change in RAND SF-36 scores from baseline to week 6 follow-up. (A) Change in RAND SF-36 MHC score. (B) Change in RAND SF-36 PHC score. Boxes indicate 25th to 75th percentile, central line is the median, whiskers are upper and lower adjacent values, outliers are values beyond the upper and lower adjacent values. ENO=English National Opera. MHC=mental health composite. PHC=physical health composite. SF-36=36-item short form survey instrument. Credit: The Lancet Respiratory Medicine (2022). DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00125-4

An online breathing and well-being program helps improve quality of life and breathlessness for people recovering from COVID-19, according to a new study.

This is one of the first clinical trials to report an effective intervention for people with post-COVID syndrome, also known as long COVID. The study is published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

The "ENO Breathe" program has been developed by the English National Opera (ENO) and respiratory clinicians at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. It uses singing techniques to improve well-being for patients with persistent breathlessness due to COVID-19. The social prescribing program has been providing support to people in London and across England since September 2020 and is led by ENO Engage, the ENO's learning and participation department.

Patients are referred to ENO Breathe via specialist NHS post-COVID assessment services following a review of their condition and medical treatments. 70 services are now referring to ENO Breathe across London and England. This includes areas that Arts Council England and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport have identified as Leveling up for Culture places such as Blackpool, Peterborough, North Somerset, and Stoke on Trent. The six-week program is delivered online, starting with a one-to-one session, once-weekly group sessions, and a range of online resources throughout the program. To date, over 1,000 participants have accessed the free program.

A clinical trial of 150 participants, with ongoing breathlessness for an average of 320 days since the onset of COVID-19 symptoms, has been conducted by researchers at Imperial College London alongside the program team at Imperial College Healthcare. The study found that ENO Breathe participants experienced a 10.48 point (out of 100) reduction in breathlessness while running, compared to people who just continued with usual care alone. They also experienced a 2.42 point improvement in the mental component of quality of life, as measured by a validated online questionnaire.

These health improvements were explained in more detail using focus groups and questionnaires, which showed that ENO Breathe participants reported experiencing improvements in their symptoms, felt the program complemented other care they were receiving, and that using singing techniques and music suited their needs. Additional analyses focusing on participants that went to all the sessions, found improvements in a wider range of respiratory symptoms, anxiety, and had larger quality of life improvements. For example, 40 percent of ENO Breathe participants experienced a five-point improvement in the mental component of quality of life, compared with 17 percent in the usual care group. This suggests the participants who engaged most with the program got the biggest benefit. Though the physical component of quality of life did not improve more in either group.

ENO Breathe uses weekly group online sessions and digital resources, developed with the support of healthcare professionals, to empower participants with tools and techniques to improve the way they breathe and how they engage with their breathing. The program is led by professional singers from the ENO and focuses on breathing retraining through singing techniques, using lullabies as its musical starting point. No experience or interest in singing is required.

Breathlessness is one of the most common symptoms in people with long COVID. Many factors can contribute, including damage to the lungs and supporting tissues, impact on the nervous system and other ongoing symptoms such as fatigue and cough. Anxiety around breathing can exacerbate breathlessness and all these factors can influence how people breathe after COVID-19 infection, potentially worsening their quality of life. As of January 2022, it is estimated that 1.5 million people in the UK may be experiencing long COVID symptoms.

Lead author of the study, Dr. Keir Phillip, Clinical Research Fellow at the National Heart and Lung Institute at Imperial College London, said:

"We urgently need evidence-based treatments and interventions for people with long COVID, which currently affects approximately 1 in 50 people in the UK. Our study suggests that arts-in-health interventions can be effective tools for carefully selected participants, especially when successfully integrated with clinical services."

"Our study suggests that the improvements in symptoms experienced by participants, resulted from both practical breathing techniques learnt, but also the creative, humane, and positive way the program is delivered."

Senior author, Dr. Sarah Elkin, consultant lead for the program and a respiratory consultant at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, said:

"As we continue to recover from the impact of the pandemic, it's vital we find ways to support people with long COVID who are experiencing debilitating symptoms long after recovering from their initial COVID-19 infection. It is extremely important to build an evidence base for programs such as ENO Breathe, so we can continue to understand how best to support people with long COVID and make improvements that can lead to better outcomes."

Professor Nicholas Hopkinson, co-senior author and Professor of Respiratory Medicine at Imperial College London, said:

"Breathlessness is one of the most common symptoms that people with long COVID experience. The ENO Breathe program is designed to help people with the condition to learn how to control their breathing better. Our research shows that it is effective, and the program has already benefitted more than 1000 people recruited from post-COVID clinics across the UK."

Dr. Harry Brunjes, Chair of the English National Opera, said:

"We are extremely proud that ENO Breathe has been evidenced to aid the recovery of the people with long-COVID it has been designed to help. Research like this demonstrates the enormous benefit the arts can have when applied in a medical context. We're enormously grateful to our partners at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust for their dedicated work in developing this program with us, and to Imperial College's phenomenal team for their painstaking research."

James Sanderson, CEO of The National Academy for Social Prescribing (NASP), said:

"At NASP we believe that social prescribing can transform people's health, so it is exciting to see clinical evidence published which demonstrates the effectiveness of a social prescribing program. We are delighted to be able to support ENO's "Breathe' classes that are improving the lives of hundreds of people living with long COVID."

Trial participants were all recovering from COVID-19 with ongoing breathlessness, either with or without associated anxiety, and had been referred from post-COVID assessment clinics after appropriate investigations and treatment. The majority of participants (81 percent) were female, which is broadly representative of the wider population of patients with long COVID.

Participants were split into two groups. One group (74 people) took part in the six-week ENO Breathe program and a control group (76 people) continued with their usual care as directed by their post-COVID assessment clinic. Both groups were assessed after six weeks, when the control group were then also offered the opportunity to take part in the program.

The researchers collected information about participants' health and well-being via online questionnaires, and used focus groups and feedback questions to assess participant experience. They measured mental and physical components of a validated "Health-Related Quality of Life" tool that assesses key indicators of quality of life, including difficulties resulting from health problems, social impacts, pain and impact on daily activities. The researchers also assessed other disease impacts including breathlessness, anxiety, and a range of other symptoms.

There were also three common qualitative themes regarding participant experience—an improvement in symptoms, a feeling that the program complemented the care they were receiving, and that singing and breathing suited their needs.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Fear and Loathing of the Unvaccinated Gets Another Boost
By Bhaskaran Raman
April 28, 2022

A study was published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) titled “Impact of population mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated subpopulations on infectious disease dynamics: implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission,” on April 25, 2022. Set in the context of Covid-19 and based on a simulation model study of various mixes of unjabbed and jabbed populations, the study concluded that the unvaccinated pose a risk to the vaccinated.

This immediately made waves in the media in many parts of the world: WION News, The Hamilton Spectator, NDTV (India), DNA (India), Times Now (India), etc.

CANADA – On the same day 13 news organisations coordinated stories to reignite division and fear of citizens who refused to comply.
Instigating hatred to stigmatise anyone who chose to think for themselves.
You thought it was over? It isn’t.#Canada pic.twitter.com/JRK6JmtPdr
— Bernie's Tweets (@BernieSpofforth) April 27, 2022

The above conclusion of the study goes against the layperson observation that highly jabbed populations have faced repeated surges: e.g. Israel, various countries in Europe, USA, etc., while populations with only a low percentage of people jabbed haven’t had surges: India, various African countries, etc. In fact in many places like Singapore, South Korea, Hong Kong, etc. even the first surge happened only after a high percentage of the population was jabbed. [Data references: Our World in Data].

The publication’s conclusion not only is against layperson observation, but also against other careful statistical studies. As early as Sep 2021, a study titled “Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States” looked at statistical correlation between jab levels and reported Covid-19 cases, and in fact found a slight positive correlation: higher level of jabs was correlated positively with higher Covid-19 cases.

Post this statistical study, with the arrival of Omicron, further data from around the world has shown that infection rates are higher in vaccinated (even boosted) populations. For instance, the graph shows the test positivity rates for various levels of vaccination in the U.S. The unvaccinated have a higher percentage of tests but the lowest percent of positivity. It is clear that the vaccine does nothing to prevent infection after waning; in fact it could increase the chance of testing positive.

Screen-Shot-2022-04-28-at-3.05.14-PM-800x290.png


Screen-Shot-2022-04-28-at-3.05.02-PM-800x289.png


Despite all the above, how did the CMAJ study arrive at the conclusion it did? Let us now look at the technical merit of the study.

First, we note that it is a simulation study, not real-world data. In science, while simulations can be useful in many situations, real-world data has much more merit since no simulation can capture reality perfectly.

A closer look at the details of the simulation study reveals deep technical problems, listed below.

1. The study says “We did not model waning immunity.” There is a preponderance of studies as well as real-world data showing waning immunity of the current Covid-19 jabs. The jab efficacy against symptomatic infection as well as hospitalization is known to be waning within 3-6 months. Therefore not modeling waning immunity is a clear mismatch​
with reality.​
2. The simulation has taken jab efficacy as 80% (Table-1 in the study). Now, this too is way far from reality. While a recently case-controlled study in England showed jab efficacy as low as -2.7% (minus 2.7%) after six months of double-jab, the above mentioned population-wide data from the U.S. shows a jab efficacy lower than -100% (minus 100%) for the triple-jabbed.​
3. The simulation takes the baseline immunity in the unjabbed as 20% (Table-1 in the study). This is yet another parameter quite far from reality in most places in the world now. In India, sero-surveys have shown that most people are now naturally exposed to the virus. Even in the U.S., the CDC has said that most Americans have been exposed to the virus. This is significant since various studies have affirmed that immunity after natural exposure is strong, long-lasting and far superior to jab-induced immunity.​

Thus the much publicized CMAJ simulation study is based on assumptions which are known to be flawed. The conclusions may be true in an alternate world where immunity from natural exposure is poor, and Covid-19 vaccine have high efficacy which does not wane; but they certainly do not hold in the real world.

It is also worthwhile pointing to the statement of “competing interests” declared in the publication, which says that one of the authors has served on various advisory boards for Covid-19 vaccines. Whether this indicates competence or bias should be left to the reader to interpret, and responsible media journalists should also indicate such competing interests while reporting on publication results.

Bhaskaran Raman is a faculty in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at IIT Bombay. Views expressed here are his personal opinion. He maintains the site: “Understand, Unclog, Unpanic, Unscare, Unlock (U5) India” Understand, Unclog, Unpanic, Unscare, Unlock (U5) India . He can be reached via twitter, telegram: @br_cse_iitb . br@cse.iitb.ac.in
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Public health has fragmented trust
The problem is not rogue online misinformation; it is errors from CDC, NIAID, and the White House
Vinay Prasad
16 hr ago

Building trust in institutions is vital to their success, but as we enter the third year of the pandemic, public health still seems hellbent on destroying itself.

In recent weeks, we have seen flip flops on major policy proposal: a vaccine passport for domestic air-travel and authorizing the Pfizer vaccine for kids ages 6mo-4 years. These were publicly flirted with, but eventually abandoned. The administration has pushed medical products through, without the traditional advisory boards (as in the case of the 4th dose for Americans over 50). We have witnessed absurd contradictions-- that Kyrie Irving can watch the basketball game from the first row, but not play on the court--, and worse, that this rule only applies in New York city. Finally, the prospect that mask mandates may return in the fall looms over us, even as our rules become more absurd, with restaurant servers and preschoolers acting as the last, powerless people tasked with masking for all. Public health, the institution, must own these absurdities and contradictions because the CDC has the scope and authority to correct them with clear guidance.
Just as we need trust, public health seems poised to destroy it . Let's consider these cases:

In early October 2021 Ashish Jha, the newly selected Biden COVID Czar, suggested a vaccine mandate for domestic air travel, a view he reiterated in late January 2022. On Dec 27th, Anthony Fauci emphasized the idea of a vaccine passport for domestic air travel. Politico reports that Dr. Jha has long advised the administration on health policy, and Dr. Jha has confirmed he received “updates and announcements” from the administration prior to his appointment. Then silently, the proposal was abandoned with no action taken. As a close observer, I was confused as to what happened.

Similarly, in Feb 2022, the FDA asked Pfizer to submit data from an ongoing, and to date, negative trial for vaccination in kids ages 6mo to 4 years. An advisory committee was scheduled to discuss the results, which was leaked to news outlets as a reduction in symptomatic cases-- one of the trials secondary objectives. Then, at the penultimate moment, the application was withdrawn and the advisory committee was cancelled. These flip flops were jarring. In the latter case, many parents were crushed, and felt as if the rug were pulled out from them. Scientists voiced protest, suggesting the vaccine be approved anyway. But I was most concerned that an approval based on inadequate data would further poison vaccine hesitancy at all ages, and for other vaccines (so called spill-over effects). Even as it stands, this whipsaw news coverage may yet undermine parental trust.

Last year, the top two officials at US FDA famously resigned, citing pressure from the White House to approve boosters (a 3rd dose) for all adults, despite inadequate data showing benefit at young ages. Now without this institutional memory, the White House pushed ahead with an ambitious plan to authorize a 4th dose of the original, ancestral Wuhan strain mRNA product for anyone 50 or older. The advisory committee, a bulwark of transparency and independence, was skipped and the product has now been pushed through. This is a controversial decision because the data showing a 4th dose helps older people is based on observational studies, which are often unreliable, and, in this case, plagued by the bias that wealthier people preferentially sought it out. Better outcomes after a 4th dose cannot be disentangled from better socioeconomic factors. Moreover, there are underappreciated risk of more doses of the same vaccine, including original antigenic sin. This term means that at some point in the future, if we authorize a different vaccine made to target a new variant, recipients of 4th doses of the older vaccine may be more likely to mount an antibody response to the original strain and not the modified spike protein. This is an unknown risk to the current policy.

The public saga of Kyrie Irving reminded the world just how absurd COVID policies can be. Mr. Irving is an employee of the Brooklyn Nets, and subject to NYCs employer vaccine mandate. As such he cannot work in NYC. But recently NYC dropped the vaccine and mask mandate to attend Brooklyn nets games. Kyrie can stand in the front row and cheer, but he cannot stand on the court. He can also play during away games, and visiting unvaccinated players can play in New York. The policy was so contradictory that Kevin Durant, a teammate, called it 'ridiculous'. In response to criticism, the mayor exempted athletes from the mandate, a band-aid solution that makes the policy even more unjust to average workers, and is now what some are calling the “Kyrie carveout.”

Finally, we continue to be obsessed with masks. Masking kids, preschoolers, and possibly restoring mask mandates in the Fall, if cases rise. This rhetoric belies the deep truth: we know very little about when and if community mask mandates slow the spread. Moreover, in a country where any adult who wishes to get vaccinated for the last year could get vaccinated, the purpose of mandatory masks, even if they work (like tight fitting n95s), seem pointless. Sars cov 2 will eventually infect nearly everyone on earth., a fact acknowledged by Anthony Fauci. Delaying this inevitability while stoking political anger seems a foolish proposition.

Public health is, to some degree, responsible for these contradictions, inconveniences, and irrationalities. Government agencies and actors have failed to articulate the goals. Failed communicate uncertainty, especially around masking kids-- an intervention where the US deviates from Europe and the World Health Organization. The Surgeon General is on a hunt for misinformation, and upset with podcaster Joe Rogan, but appears entirely incapable of introspection. Trust in public health is gone not despite the actions of public health, but because of them. When a star dies, it may shower pieces across the galaxy, and if public health implodes, Americans will seek out snake-oil salesman and charlatans, and we will have only ourselves to blame.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Fauci says 'herd immunity' is out of reach, pandemic 'by no means' over
Alexander Nazaryan ·Senior White House Correspondent
Fri, April 29, 2022, 1:17 PM

WASHINGTON — Dr. Anthony Fauci capped off a week of controversial comments with an appearance Friday morning at the National Press Club, during which he sought to give an overview of where the COVID-19 pandemic currently stands.

It has been one of those weeks that have seen Fauci’s polarizing presence frequently in news, his efforts to explain the current moment of the coronavirus pandemic dissected and criticized by a bitterly divided public.

On Tuesday, he told “PBS NewsHour” that the United States appeared to be “out of the pandemic phase,” irritating some public health experts who found the prediction cavalier. He revised those remarks in a Washington Post interview the following day, assessing the nation as moving “into a transitional phase, from a deceleration of the numbers into hopefully a more controlled phase and endemicity.”

Fauci also said Tuesday evening that he would no longer be attending Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner, citing an individual risk assessment but offering little insight into what factors had gone into that decision.

Fauci, who serves as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the chief medical adviser to the president, clarified his view of the pandemic once again on Friday. “By no means is it over,” he said. “We still are experiencing a global pandemic.”

Having led the government’s response to the AIDS crisis early in his career and later personally treating Ebola patients, Fauci issued a warning for the future. Even as the coronavirus may be receding in parts of the world with high vaccination rates, it is doubtless that another pandemic awaits, perhaps in the near future.

“We absolutely must be perpetually prepared for the inevitability of another pandemic,” he said. The Biden administration has asked for billions of dollars to enhance surveillance of emerging viruses.

New variants of the coronavirus will continue to emerge too, Fauci said, frustrating the goal of “herd immunity” that he and others once held out, since new strains — like the currently circulating BA.2 subvariant of Omicron — have shown an ability to evade immune protection, though without making people sicker than the original coronavirus.

“We’re not going to get classical herd immunity” from the coronavirus, Fauci predicted at the press club, a reversal of the seemingly long-ago days when he and others predicted that vaccination benchmarks would signal a defeat of the coronavirus.

“It’s very difficult to really get a strong classical herd immunity” — of the kind the United States enjoys from polio and measles — “when you have immunity that wanes and a virus that, in fact, does not stay stable,” he said Friday. “And you have an anti-vax movement, which prevents many of the people from getting vaccinated.”

Fauci also addressed the onerous lockdowns China has used to handle an Omicron outbreak in Shanghai, where tens of millions have been living under a public safety regime that has severely curtailed everyday freedoms.

“China is having a really serious problem,” he said. “They’ve locked down without necessarily adequately vaccinating their population, so now they’re seeing really substantial surges in big cities. So that’s going to really be a problem in China.”

Addressing the question of how the coronavirus affects children, Fauci stopped short of offering his views on why they tend to be largely — though not entirely — protected from serious cases of COVID-19.

“If I surmise, it will become a sound bite,” he said. “And that’s not good.”

~~~~~~~~~~~
There is a different video posted at the article, but it won't post here so I am posting tw youtubes of him at the same conference also discussing herd immunity:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZbxoNrIeWg
1 min 3 sec

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMjf55LUzOs
1 min 45 sec
 
Last edited:

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Covid deaths no longer overwhelmingly among unvaccinated as toll on elderly grows
Fenit Nirappil and Dan Keating
Fri, April 29, 2022, 9:21 AM

WASHINGTON — Unvaccinated people accounted for the overwhelming majority of deaths in the United States throughout much of the coronavirus pandemic. But that has changed in recent months, according to a Washington Post analysis of state and federal data.

The pandemic's toll is no longer falling almost exclusively on those who chose not to get shots, with vaccine protection waning over time and the elderly and immunocompromised - who are at greatest risk of succumbing to covid-19, even if vaccinated - having a harder time dodging increasingly contagious strains.

The vaccinated made up 42% of fatalities in January and February during the highly contagious omicron variant's surge, compared with 23% of the dead in September, the peak of the delta wave, according to nationwide data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed by The Post. The data is based on the date of infection and limited to a sampling of cases in which vaccination status was known.

As a group, the unvaccinated remain far more vulnerable to the worst consequences of infection - and are far more likely to die - than people who are vaccinated, and they are especially more at risk than people who have received a booster shot.

"It's still absolutely more dangerous to be unvaccinated than vaccinated," said Andrew Noymer, a public health professor at the University of California at Irvine who studies covid-19 mortality. "A pandemic of - and by - the unvaccinated is not correct. People still need to take care in terms of prevention and action if they became symptomatic."

A key explanation for the rise in deaths among the vaccinated is that covid-19 fatalities are again concentrated among the elderly.

Nearly two-thirds of the people who died during the omicron surge were 75 and older, according to a Post analysis, compared with a third during the delta wave. Seniors are overwhelmingly immunized, but vaccines are less effective and their potency wanes over time in older age groups.

Experts say they are not surprised that vaccinated seniors are making up a greater share of the dead, even as vaccine holdouts died far more often than the vaccinated during the omicron surge, according to the CDC. As more people are infected with the virus, the more people it will kill, including a greater number who are vaccinated but among the most vulnerable.

The bulk of vaccinated deaths are among people who did not get a booster shot, according to state data provided to The Post. In two of the states, California and Mississippi, three-quarters of the vaccinated senior citizens who died in January and February did not have booster doses. Regulators in recent weeks have authorized second booster doses for people over the age of 50, but administration of first booster doses has stagnated.

Even though the death rates for the vaccinated elderly and immunocompromised are low, their losses numbered in the thousands when cases exploded, leaving behind blindsided families. But experts say the rising number of vaccinated people dying should not cause panic in those who got shots, the vast majority of whom will survive infections. Instead, they say, these deaths serve as a reminder that vaccines are not foolproof and that those in high-risk groups should consider getting boosted and taking extra precautions during surges.

"Vaccines are one of the most important and longest-lasting tools we have to protect ourselves," said California State Epidemiologist Erica Pan, citing state estimates showing vaccines have shown to be 85% effective in preventing death.
"Unfortunately, that does leave another 15," she said.

- - -

Arianne Bennett recalled her husband, Scott Bennett, saying, "But I'm vaxxed. But I'm vaxxed," from the Washington hospital bed where he struggled to fight off covid-19 this winter.

Friends had a hard time believing Bennett, co-founder of the Washington-based chain Amsterdam Falafelshop, was 70. The adventurous longtime entrepreneur hoped to buy a bar and planned to resume scuba-diving trips and 40-mile bike rides to George Washington's Mount Vernon estate.

Bennett went to get his booster in early December after returning to Washington from a lodge he owned in the Poconos, where he and his wife hunkered down for fall. Just a few days after his shot, Bennett began experiencing covid-19 symptoms, meaning he was probably exposed before the extra dose of immunity could kick in. His wife suspects he was infected at a dinner where he and his server were unmasked at times.

A fever-stricken Bennett limped into the hospital alongside his wife, who was also infected, a week before Christmas. He died Jan. 13, among the 125,000 Americans who succumbed to covid-19 in January and February.

"He was absolutely shocked. He did not expect to be sick. He really thought he was safe,'" Arianne Bennett recalled. "And I'm like, 'But baby, you've got to wear the mask all the time. All the time. Up over your nose.'"

Jason Salemi, an epidemiologist at the University of South Florida College of Public Health, said the deaths of vaccinated people are among the consequences of a pandemic response that emphasizes individuals protecting themselves.

"When we are not taking this collective effort to curb community spread of the virus, the virus has proven time and time again it's really good at finding that subset of vulnerable people," Salemi said.

While experts say even the medically vulnerable should feel assured that a vaccine will probably save their lives, they should remain vigilant for signs of infection. As more therapeutics become available, early detection and treatment is key.

When Wayne Perkey, 84, first started sneezing and feeling other cold symptoms in early February, he resisted his physician daughter's plea to get tested for the coronavirus.

The legendary former morning radio host in Louisville had been boosted in October. He diligently wore a mask and kept his social engagements to a minimum. It must have been the common cold or allergies, he believed. Even the physician who ordered a chest X-ray and had no coronavirus tests on hand thought so.

Perkey relented, and the test came back positive. He didn't think he needed to go to the hospital, even as his oxygen levels declined.

"In his last voice conversation with me, he said, 'I thought I was doing everything right,'" recalled Lady Booth Olson, another daughter, who lives in Virginia. "I believe society is getting complacent, and clearly somebody he was around was carrying the virus. ... We'll never know."

From his hospital bed, Perkey resumed a familiar role as a high-profile proponent for vaccines and coronavirus precautions. He was familiar to many Kentuckians who grew up hearing his voice on the radio and watched him host the televised annual Crusade for Children fundraiser. He spent much of the pandemic as a caregiver to his ex-wife who struggled with chronic fatigue and other long-haul covid symptoms.

"It's the 7th day of my Covid battle, the worst day so far, and my anger boils when I hear deniers talk about banning masks or social distancing," Perkey wrote on Facebook on Feb. 16, almost exactly one year after he posted about getting his first shot. "I remember times we cared about our neighbors."

In messages to a family group chat, he struck an optimistic note. "Thanks for all the love and positive energy," he texted on Feb. 23. "Wear your mask."

As is often the case for covid-19 patients, his condition rapidly turned for the worse. His daughter Rebecca Booth, the physician, suspects a previous bout with leukemia made it harder for his immune system to fight off the virus. He died March 6.

"Really and truly his final days were about, 'This virus is bad news.' He basically was saying: 'Get vaccinated. Be careful. But there is no guarantee,'" Rebecca Booth said. "And, 'If you think this isn't a really bad virus, look at me.' And it is."

Hospitals, particularly in highly vaccinated areas, have also seen a shift from covid wards filled predominantly with the unvaccinated. Many who end up in the hospital have other conditions that weakens the shield afforded by the vaccine.

Vaccinated people made up slightly less than half the patients in the intensive care units of Kaiser Permanente's Northern California hospital system in December and January, according to a spokesman.

Gregory Marelich, chair of critical care for the 21 hospitals in that system, said most of the vaccinated and boosted people he saw in ICUs were immunosuppressed, usually after organ transplants or because of medications for diseases such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis.

"I've cared for patients who are vaccinated and immunosuppressed and are in disbelief when they come down with covid," Marelich said.

- - -

Jessica Estep, 41, rang a bell celebrating her last treatment for follicular lymphoma in September. The single mother of two teenagers had settled into a new home in Michigan, near the Indiana border. After her first marriage ended, she found love again and got married in a zoo in November.

As an asthmatic cancer survivor, Estep knew she faced a heightened risk from covid-19, relatives said. She saw only a tight circle of friends and worked in her own office in her electronics repair job. She lived in an area where around 1 in 4 residents are fully vaccinated. She planned to get a booster shot in the winter.

"She was the most nonjudgmental person I know," said her mother, Vickie Estep. "It was OK with her if people didn't mask up or get vaccinated. It was okay with her that they exercised their right of choice, but she just wanted them to do that away from her so that she could be safe."

With Michigan battling back-to-back surges of the delta and omicron variants, Jessica Estep wasn't able to dodge the virus any longer - she fell ill in mid-December. After surviving a cancer doctors described as incurable, Estep died Jan. 27.
Physicians said the coronavirus essentially turned her lungs into concrete, her mother said.

Estep's 14-year-old daughter now lives with her grandparents. Her widower returned to Indianapolis just months after he moved to Michigan to be with his new wife.

Her family shared her story with a local television station in hopes of inspiring others to get vaccinated, to protect people such as Estep who could not rely on their own vaccination as a foolproof shield. In response to the station's Facebook post about the story, several commenters shrugged off their pleas and insinuated it was the vaccines rather than covid causing deaths.

Immunocompromised people and those with other underlying conditions are worth protecting, Vickie Estep said. "There's life potential in those people."

- - -

As Arianne Bennett navigates life without her husband, she hopes the lesson people heed from his death is to take advantage of all tools available to mitigate a virus that still finds and kills the vulnerable, including by getting boosters.

Bennett wore a music festival shirt her husband gave her as she walked into a grocery store to get her third shot in March. Her husband urged her to get one when they returned to Washington, but she became sick at the same time he did. She scheduled the appointment for the earliest she could get the shot: 90 days after receiving monoclonal antibodies to treat the disease.

"My booster! Yay!" Bennett exclaimed in her chair as the pharmacist presented an updated vaccine card.

"It's been challenging, but we got through it," the pharmacist said, unaware of Scott Bennett's death.

Tears welled in Bennett's eyes as the needle went in her left arm, just over a year after she and her husband received their first shots.

"Last time we got it, we took selfies: 'Look, we had vaccines,'" Bennett said, beginning to sob. "This one leaves me crying, missing him so much."

The pharmacist leaned over and gave Bennett a hug in her chair.

"He would want you to do this," the pharmacist said. "You have to know."


The Washington Post's Lenny Bernstein contributed to this report.

~~~~

Death rates compare the number of deaths in various groups with an adjustment for the number of people in each group. The death rates listed for the fully vaccinated, the unvaccinated and those vaccinated with boosters were calculated by the CDC using a sample of deaths from 23 health departments in the country that record vaccine status, including boosters, for deaths related to covid-19. The CDC study assigns deaths to the month when a patient contracted covid-19, not the month of death. The latest data published in April reflected deaths of people who contracted covid as of February. The CDC study of deaths among the vaccinated is online, and the data can be downloaded.

The death rates for fully vaccinated people, unvaccinated people and fully vaccinated people who received an additional booster are expressed as deaths per 100,000 people. The death rates are also called incidence rates. The CDC estimated the population sizes from census data and vaccination records. The study does not include partially vaccinated people in the deaths or population. CDC adjusted the population sizes for inaccuracies in the vaccination data. The death data is provisional and subject to change. The study sample includes the population eligible for boosters, which was originally 18 and older, and now is 12 and older.

To compare death rates between groups with different vaccination status, the CDC uses incidence rate ratios. For example, if one group has a rate of 10 deaths per 100,000 people, the death incidence rate would be 10. Another group may have a death incidence rate of 2.5. The ratio between the first group and the second group is the rate of 10 divided by the rate of 2.5, so the incidence rate ratio would be 4 (10 ÷ 2.5 = 4). That means the first group dies at a rate four times that of the second group.

The CDC calculates the death incidence rates and incidence rate ratios by age groups. It also calculates a value for the entire population adjusted for the size of the population in each age group. The Post used those age-adjusted total death incidence rates and incidence rate ratios.

The Post calculated the share of deaths by vaccine status from the sample of death records the CDC used to calculate death incidence rates by vaccine status. As of April, that data included 44,000 deaths of people who contracted covid in January and February.

The share of deaths for each vaccine status does not include deaths for partially vaccinated people because they are not included in the CDC data.

The Post calculated the share of deaths in each age group from provisional covid-19 death records that have age details from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics. That data assigns deaths by the date of death, not the date on which the person contracted covid-19. That data does not include any information on vaccine status of the people who died.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Covid vaccines for children as young as SIX MONTHS could be authorized in JUNE, FDA says, as agency comes under enormous pressure to green-light Moderna jab for the age group
  • Dr Peter Marks, who heads up FDA's research arm, pledged not to delay approval
  • Moderna yesterday applied for its shot to be used in six months to five-year-olds
  • Pfizer is also expected to apply for three doses of its jab to be used in age group
  • FDA is coming under enormous pressure from some quarters to sign off on Covid vaccines for children amid rising Covid infection rates in the country
  • But children face a vanishingly small risk from an infection with the virus
By Luke Andrews Health Reporter For Dailymail.Com
Published: 16:47 EDT, 29 April 2022 | Updated: 17:54 EDT, 29 April 2022

Children who are just six months old could be eligible for their first Covid vaccine by June amid pressure from some parents and the left-wing media — but many experts doubt shots are needed for this age group.

Dr Peter Marks — a top jabs adviser at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — pledged Friday not to take any more time than is needed to approve the jabs.

Moderna applied for two doses of its vaccine to be given to children between six months and five years old on Thursday. Pfizer is expected to make the same request for three doses of its jab in the coming weeks.

If its request is approved, it will make America the first country in the world to offer jabs to children below two years old.
But many experts have already said jabs are not needed for the age group, pointing out they face the lowest risk from an infection with the virus.

Children are at a vanishingly low risk of death from the virus, with a total of 1,017 dying from Covid since March 2020, official data shows — accounting for around 0.01 per cent of America's almost a million deaths from the virus. For comparison, among people aged 65 and over the death toll is 724million.

More than three in four children under 12 years have also already caught Covid and now have antibodies against the virus, national surveillance suggests.

The above graph shows the proportion of 5 to 11-year-olds, which can get Pfizer's vaccine, which have got one or two doses of the vaccine. It is currently up to 28 per cent being double-jabbed, despite the shots being available to the age group since October

The above graph shows the proportion of 5 to 11-year-olds, which can get Pfizer's vaccine, which have got one or two doses of the vaccine. It is currently up to 28 per cent being double-jabbed, despite the shots being available to the age group since October

The above graph shows the proportion of 12 to 17-year-olds that have got a booster jab against Covid. It is just under a quarter, at 24.5 per cent

The above graph shows the proportion of 12 to 17-year-olds that have got a booster jab against Covid. It is just under a quarter, at 24.5 per cent

No Covid vaccines have yet been made available for America's 18 million children aged five years and younger.
Cuba has been vaccinating children as young as two years since October, while both Chile and China are offering jabs to everyone over the age of three years.

Marks told the Washington Post today: 'We are not going to delay things unnecessarily here.

'We would anticipate June authorizations for one or more of the pediatric vaccinations.'

Moderna is expected to file a 'full package' of information allowing it to get emergency use authorization in the second week of May.

The FDA will then hold meetings with its outside advisers on June 8, 21 and 22 to consider the request.

The mRNA vaccine is already available to everyone 18 years old and above in the U.S. and has been administered to 216 million.

Pfizer's jab was approved for people aged 12 to 15 years old in May, and then five to 11 year olds in October.

But CDC statistics show just over 28 percent of five to 11-year-olds are now fully vaccinated.

Among 12 to 17-year-olds almost 60 percent have got two doses.

A booster jab with Pfizer's shot was also approved for 12 to 17-year-olds in January.

But only a quarter of children and adolescents in this age group have also got the top-up dose so far.

Some parents are clamoring for Covid jabs to be approved for their kids amid mounting Covid cases and as almost all restrictions — including face masks — are dropped.

Left-wing publications have also been lobbying for the age group to be jabbed.

CNN published a story just today titled 'Should parents finally celebrate that there may be a vaccine for young children?'.

Others pushing for the move include The New York Times which printed a story on the issue last month that began, 'for American parents, particularly those with young children, the last couple of months have been dizzying and beyond frustrating'.

But a number of experts have raised concerns over vaccinating children, who face a small risk of becoming seriously ill with Covid and a vanishingly small chance of death.

There are also fears over myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation detected in about one in 20,000 boys following vaccination. Girls are less at risk from the complication.

While in most cases the condition is mild, scientists are not yet sure of the long-term effects.

Earlier this year vaccines expert Dr Michael Kurilla, who is also a director at the National Institutes of Health, was one of its few members to refuse to approve jabs for kids five to 11 in October.

He told DailyMail.com at the time that while he thinks children with certain conditions that put them at a high risk should receive the shot, it was not clear if they should be approved for healthy children.

Experts have also railed against booster doses for children — which Pfizer is expected to apply for among under-12s.
Dr Monica Ghandi, an infectious diseases expert at California University, San Francisco, said: 'The fact that 75 percent of our children and adolescents in the U.S. have now been exposed to Covid and have evidence of [antibodies] is further evidence that booster shots are not needed for this population.'

Ghandi has previously said she did not plan to get either of her 12 and 14-year-olds sons the booster dose because the risks 'outweigh' the benefits.

57205949-10768683-image-a-54_1651263707317.jpg


57205951-10768683-image-a-37_1651263160601.jpg


The FDA's promise today to approve shots quickly follows on from reports suggesting it would not review Moderna's application until it also had Pfizer's.

It suggested regulators may be uneasy about authorizing a shot that could be 'less effective' when another was only a few weeks away.

Dr Marks told the Post that if the vaccines are ready within a week of each other he might present their applications for consideration on consecutive days.

But if there is a longer time lag, he said he would hold separate meetings with advisers.

None region in the U.S. has more than 45 per cent of its five to 11-year-olds fully-vaccinated against Covid.

More than 150 million Covid vaccines are currently sitting in storage or have been thrown away since the roll out began, data suggests.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Is it time to ditch the Covid numbers? Pressure mounts on UK as Ireland announces it's stopping daily updates
  • Pressure is mounting on the UK to scrap its daily Covid stats after Ireland said it would discontinue its updates
  • Experts told MailOnline daily Covid numbers are showing a 'diminishingly small proportion' of actual cases
  • But UK health bosses told MailOnline that there are 'currently no plans' to scrap the daily numbers
  • There were 12,421 new positive tests recorded today , down 37.3 per cent on the 19,795 recorded last Friday
  • Deaths reached their lowest daily total since the start of the month, dropping 18.8 per cent in a week to 216
  • ONS data suggests 2.4million people in England were infected with Covid last week — 4% or one in 25 people
By Joe Davies Health Reporter and Emily Craig Health Reporter For Mailonline
Published: 11:36 EDT, 29 April 2022 | Updated: 13:47 EDT, 29 April 2022

Pressure is mounting on the UK to scrap its daily Covid stats after Ireland said it would discontinue its updates.

Experts told MailOnline that the UK's daily infection numbers are showing a 'diminishingly small proportion' of actual cases now that free testing has been scrapped for the vast majority of Britons.


Ireland's Department of Health today confirmed it will 'no longer' publish daily Covid figures. Instead, outbreak figures will be 'updated regularly' on the country's Covid dashboard.

The country's health chiefs will continue to monitor all information relating to the epidemiology of the virus, including case numbers, local outbreaks and trends, as well as the emergence and detection of new variants in Ireland and abroad.

Professor Paul Hunter, an epidemiologist based at the University of East Anglia, told MailOnline the UK will follow suit 'at some point' and it is 'quite right' that Covid data is only shared through weekly updates — as is done for influenza — as the crisis becomes an epidemic.

But UK health bosses told MailOnline that there are 'currently no plans' to scrap the daily numbers, which today showed 12,421 new positive tests, down 37 per cent on last week.

The daily figures also revealed deaths reached their lowest total since the start of the month, dropping by a fifth. And hospitalisations also continued to plunge, dropping 23.4 per cent to 1,260 on Monday, the latest date data is available for.

Separate Government statistics showed England's Covid outbreak has shrunk to its lowest size in two months as the country's latest wave continues to recede naturally.

Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) suggests 2.4million people in England were infected with the virus any day last week, equivalent to one in 25 people — down by a quarter on the previous week.

The huge surveillance study, based on swabs of 120,000 people and considered the best way of measuring the nation's outbreak, logged its lowest figure since the week beginning February 26.

Just weeks ago, NHS leaders were calling for face masks and outdoor mixing to return to bring down infection rates, which had spiralled to pandemic highs.

57209355-0-image-a-30_1651246193866.jpg


57209353-0-image-a-33_1651246218864.jpg


57209349-0-image-a-34_1651246224445.jpg


57209351-0-image-a-36_1651246232623.jpg



Data from the Office for National Statistics suggests 2.4million people in England were infected with the virus last week, equivalent to one in 25 people — down by a quarter in just seven days

Data from the Office for National Statistics suggests 2.4million people in England were infected with the virus last week, equivalent to one in 25 people — down by a quarter in just seven days

Professor Paul Hunter, an epidemiologist based at the University of East Anglia, told MailOnline: 'I think at some point the UK will be doing that [ditching daily numbers] as well and that's quite proportionate.

'As the disease becomes an epidemic and gets to equilibrium it's quite right that we start to treat Covid as we treat influenza, which we do weekly figures for.

'Daily numbers are showing a diminishingly small proportion of cases that have been occurring.

'Data from the ONS suggests daily numbers show only one in 13 cases, compared to other moments in pandemic when one in two or one in three cases have been spotted.'

A spokesperson for the UK Health Security Agency said: 'As we move forward in the pandemic, changes to reporting across the four nations means Covid metrics will be updated on different dates and schedules.

'Variations in reporting schedules should be considered when looking at reported Covid figures and day-to-day comparisons may therefore be misleading.

'There are currently no plans to cease reporting Covid data on the UKHSA dashboard.'

It comes as ONS data today showed cases fell in every part of England and among all age groups last week.
They also declined in Scotland and Wales, however the trend was uncertain in Northern Ireland.

The ONS has released an interactive map that allows you to look up the case rate in your local area in the most recent week.

Kara Steel, a senior statistician at the ONS, said: 'Infections have thankfully continued to decrease across most of the UK, though we are yet to see if this is part of a larger trend.'

Despite the 'welcome decreases' in infections, she warned case rates 'remain high'.

Since the more transmissible but milder Omicron strains took off across the country in December, Covid cases have soared to record levels, with 4.1million infections logged at the latest peak last month.

NHS hospitals — tasked with tackling the backlog of patients whose care was disrupted by the pandemic —felt pressure from the resurgence, even though virus admissions were only half of in previous waves.

But the number of patients occupying intensive care beds barely changed throughout the latest wave, illustrating how the threat of Covid has receded thanks to the country's sky-high immunity rates.

Deaths in England never breached 250 a day in April, similar to levels seen in bad flu seasons.

The latest ONS data estimates that Covid prevalence rates fell to 2,408,300 in England in the week to April 23, the equivalent to roughly 4.42 per cent of people being infected.

The figure is 25.2 per cent lower than one week earlier, when the statisticians estimated there were 3,218,700 cases.
Virus prevalence also continued to fall in Scotland, where 218,000 people (one in 25, 4.14 per cent) were infected, and in Wales, where 172,300 (one in 18, 5.67 per cent) were thought to be carrying the virus.

Some 74,700 people in Northern Ireland were infected (one in 25, 4.07 per cent).

But ONS bosses warned it was not clear if cases were rising or falling in the country.

The ONS said Omicron subvariant BA.2 was behind 96.5 per cent of cases in the four weeks to April 25.

The infection survey data also shows cases fell in all regions of England last week.

57201043-10767167-image-a-24_1651234821297.jpg


The latest ONS data shows Covid rates fell to 2,408,300 in England in the week to April 23, equivalent to 4.42 per cent of people being infected. The figure is 25.2 per cent lower than one week earlier, when the statisticians estimated there were 3,218,700 cases. Virus prevalence also continued to fall in Scotland, where 218,000 people (one in 25, 4.14 per cent) were infected, and in Wales, where 172,300 (one in 18, 5.67 per cent) were thought to be carrying the virus. Some 74,700 people in Northern Ireland were infected (one in 25, 4.07 per cent). But ONS bosses warned it was not clear if cases were rising or falling in the country

The latest ONS data shows Covid rates fell to 2,408,300 in England in the week to April 23, equivalent to 4.42 per cent of people being infected. The figure is 25.2 per cent lower than one week earlier, when the statisticians estimated there were 3,218,700 cases. Virus prevalence also continued to fall in Scotland, where 218,000 people (one in 25, 4.14 per cent) were infected, and in Wales, where 172,300 (one in 18, 5.67 per cent) were thought to be carrying the virus. Some 74,700 people in Northern Ireland were infected (one in 25, 4.07 per cent). But ONS bosses warned it was not clear if cases were rising or falling in the country

1651297039806.jpeg
The infection survey data also shows cases fell in all regions of England last week. Infection levels were highest in the North East, where 6.1 per cent of people were infected, followed by the West Midlands (5.2 per cent), Yorkshire and the Humber (4.9 per cent), the East Midlands (4.4 per cent) and the North West (4.3 per cent). Rates were below the national average in the South West (4.3 per cent), South East (4.1 per cent), East (4.1 per cent) and London (3.6 per cent)



England-wide estimates from the ONS also show cases fell in all age groups. Cases remained highest among the over-70s, with 5 per cent of the group testing positive, followed by 50 to 69-year-olds (4.9 per cent), 35 to 49-year-olds (4.5 per cent) and 25 to 34-year-olds (4.3 per cent). Rates were lowest among children and young adults, with 2.7 per cent of 16 to 24-year-olds infected, 1.8 per cent of 11 to 15-year-olds testing positive and 2.1 per cent of two to 10 year-olds carrying the virus

England-wide estimates from the ONS also show cases fell in all age groups. Cases remained highest among the over-70s, with 5 per cent of the group testing positive, followed by 50 to 69-year-olds (4.9 per cent), 35 to 49-year-olds (4.5 per cent) and 25 to 34-year-olds (4.3 per cent). Rates were lowest among children and young adults, with 2.7 per cent of 16 to 24-year-olds infected, 1.8 per cent of 11 to 15-year-olds testing positive and 2.1 per cent of two to 10 year-olds carrying the virus

Infection levels were highest in the North East, where 6.1 per cent of people were infected, followed by the West Midlands (5.2 per cent), Yorkshire and the Humber (4.9 per cent), the East Midlands (4.4 per cent) and the North West (4.3 per cent).
Rates were below the national average in the South West (4.3 per cent), South East (4.1 per cent), East (4.1 per cent) and London (3.6 per cent).

England-wide estimates from the ONS also show cases fell in all age groups. Cases remained highest among the over-70s, with 5 per cent of the group testing positive, followed by 50 to 69-year-olds (4.9 per cent), 35 to 49-year-olds (4.5 per cent) and 25 to 34-year-olds (4.3 per cent).

Rates were lowest among children and young adults, with 2.7 per cent of 16 to 24-year-olds infected, 1.8 per cent of 11 to 15-year-olds testing positive and 2.1 per cent of two to 10 year-olds carrying the virus.

Meanwhile, Tory MPs today claimed visiting bans still in place in some hospitals and care homes are illegal.

They warned in a letter today that 'over-interpretation of testing guidelines is leading to isolation, neglect and abuse of vulnerable residents', saying that denying visitation is 'inhumane and cruel'.

NHS guidelines were updated in March to allow two visitors 'for at least one hour per day and ideally for longer'.

However, hospitals including Queen Victoria Hospital in East Grinstead, West Sussex, have maintained limited visitation to one per day 'for a maximum of one hour'.

No10 changed the rules on care home visits in England on January 31, ditching all limits on the number of visitors in homes. Whole-home quarantine periods after a resident tests positive were also cut from 28 to 14 days.

But the Care Quality Commission in February revealed it had received complaints about visitation at 189 care services, including blanket bans on visiting at 82 homes.

MPs claim Article 8 of the Human Rights Act and the Mental Capacity Act 'could and should have protected against this situation arising'.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Daily Covid infections SURGE more than 50% over the past week - breaking the 60,000 mark for first time since start of March: Deaths remain low as the danger the virus poses declines
  • Covid infections in the U.S. are starting to surge once again, jumping 50% over the past week to over 60,000 cases per day for the first time since early March
  • Despite the surge in cases, death figures remain low, with the mortality of the virus being at its lowest point since August 2021
  • In New York City, one of the hardest hit cities by the virus in the world, only two deaths from the virus are being recorded every day
  • Officials have given confusing reports about the state of the pandemic, with Dr Anthony Fauci declaring the pandemic over earlier this week, before backtracking a day later
By Mansur Shaheen U.S. Deputy Health Editor For Dailymail.Com
Published: 10:37 EDT, 29 April 2022 | Updated: 12:43 EDT, 29 April 2022

Covid cases in America are continuing to grow, rebounding after months of declines coming off of the massive winter Omicron-surge. Like the surge this winter, deaths have remained low despite a rise in cases, showing the decreasing danger the virus poses as more mild strains continue to circulate.

The nation is currently averaging 60,251 Covid cases every day, a 52 percent jump over the past week - and the first time the 60,000 mark was reached since March 1. In the time since then, daily cases continued to plummet down to 30,000 per day, where the figure sat for weeks in mid-April.

Deaths from the virus are at one of their lowest points during the pandemic, even as cases begin to sharply rise once more. The nation is averaging 327 deaths from the virus every day at the moment, a ten percent drop over the past week - maintaining the least deadly period of the pandemic since August 2021.

Despite the overall mortality of the virus having faltered in recent months, U.S. regulators are still pushing to expand vaccine eligibility to include children aged six months to five years old, and to even open up fourth doses to all Americans.

57205949-10767537-image-a-5_1651242705471.jpg


57205951-10767537-image-a-7_1651242710587.jpg


57207043-10767537-image-a-33_1651243112342.jpg


Covid cases have more than doubled over the past two weeks in eight U.S. states, with the cases even tripling in West Virginia.

These case rises are largely attributable to the BA.2 'stealth' variant, a sub-lineage of the Omicron variant that erupted over the winter.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report that the strain makes up 68 percent of Covid cases in the U.S.

Another version of the variant is beginning to emerge as well. Two weeks ago, the CDC began to officially track the new BA.2.12.1 strain - a sub-variant of the 'stealth' variant.

It first emerged in New York earlier this month, before becoming the dominant strain in the region, and spreading across much of the rest of the country. The strain makes up 28 percent of total cases in America.

The rate of COVID-19 deaths in New York City, the hardest struck city in the world by the virus, has shrunk to only two per day, as the virus recedes in America and a majority of the population heads towards a return to 'normal'.

57205939-10767537-image-a-10_1651242724031.jpg


57205961-10767537-image-a-12_1651242727545.jpg


In New York, where around 90 percent of the adult population has received one shot of the vaccine, life has largely returned to normal, even as some official attempt to keep Covid guidelines in place.

The Big Apple is one of the shrinking list of cities in the U.S. to still have some Covid related mandates in place, with travelers still required to mask in airports, on the subway and on local busses. Just across the Hudson river, in New Jersey, travelers are not required to do so.

'I think right now, is a good time to give people the choice about how they may want to protect themselves,' Cedric Alam, a Newark resident who travels into Manhattan every other day and regularly flies out of JFK, told DailyMail.com earlier this month.

'If people think they should wear a mask, then they should go right ahead and wear one, while people who think they will be fine without one should have the freedom to travel bare faced.'

57205937-10767537-image-a-19_1651242764480.jpg


Some key health experts are instead saying the Covid is basically over, though. Dr Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert said Tuesday night that the pandemic phase of the virus was over.

'If you're saying, are we out of the pandemic phase in this country, we are. What we hope to do, I don't believe — and I have spoken about this widely — we're not going to eradicate this virus. If we can keep that level very low, and intermittently vaccinate people — and I don't know how often that would have to be,' he said.

'That might be every year, that might be longer, in order to keep that level low. But, right now, we are not in the pandemic phase in this country. Pandemic means a widespread, throughout the world, infection that spreads rapidly among people.
'If you look at the global situation, there's no doubt this pandemic is still ongoing.'

He then backtracked on his statements the next night.

'We certainly can't say the pandemic is over. It is not over,' he told CBS News on Wednesday.

57205957-10767537-image-a-1_1651250586079.jpg


57205955-10767537-image-a-15_1651242752607.jpg


Experts at the World Health Organization (WHO), which have been among the more cautious voices during the pandemic so far are still issuing dire warnings, though.

'[Rolling back of Covid surveillance] makes us increasingly blind to patterns of transmission and evolution. But this virus won't go away just because countries stop looking for it. It's still spreading, it's still changing, and it's still killing,' Ghebreyesus said.

Across America, and in some parts of Europe, Covid testing and tracking has been significantly scaled back as officials move to divert funding that went into pandemic related efforts elsewhere.

In the U.S., funding used to cover the costs of free testing for many Americans has been pulled. Hospital treatment for the virus is no longer covered by the federal government either. Cuts to testing have been so severe that some experts warn over 90 percent of cases may be going undetected in the U.S.

'The threat of a dangerous new variant remains very real – and although deaths are declining, we still don't understand the long-term consequences of infection in those who survive,' Ghebreyesus continued.

'When it comes to a deadly virus, ignorance is not bliss. WHO continues to call on all countries to maintain surveillance.'

57205945-10767537-image-a-2_1651250586081.jpg
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

None of the nine young children in Alabama who were diagnosed with hepatitis tested positive for COVID-19 despite speculation the virus was behind mysterious cases, CDC report reveals
  • The CDC has revealed the results of its first major investigation into cases of pediatric hepatitis popping up around America, and the world as a whole
  • Every single patient in Alabama tested positive for the adenovirus, and none of them had COVID-19
  • All cases have been tied to the adenovirus, and none were tied to COVID-19, stopping some speculation
  • Do you know someone who was diagnosed with 'mysterious hepatitis' in the last seven months? Contact Luke.Andrews@mailonline.co.uk
By Mansur Shaheen U.S. Deputy Health Editor For Dailymail.Com
Published: 13:00 EDT, 29 April 2022 | Updated: 15:38 EDT, 29 April 2022

All of the nine children that were diagnosed with 'mysterious hepatitis' in Alabama in October and November 2021 tested positive for the adenovirus, and none had COVID-19, a new reporter from the CDC reveals.

The report, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Friday afternoon, gives the most detailed look yet at the nine case that started what has since become a global outbreak of hepatitis.

All cases tied to the outbreak have been a rare form of the liver disease, not caused by the usual suspects, Hepatitis A, B or C. Instead many suspected either COVID-19 or the adenovirus was behind the infection.

Now, the CDC has revealed that all nine children tested positive for the adenovirus and negative for Covid. The agency also reports that seven of the nine children were female, and fine were two years old or younger.

Some experts had initially speculated that COVID-19 could be at the heart of the recent global hepatitis outbreak, for which there are 20 confirmed or suspected U.S. cases and over 100 worldwide.


Cases first emerged earlier this month, being detected scattered across Europe and in Alabama.
These are not typical cases of the liver disease, though with experts perplexed by how exactly they are emerging, since the usual causes have been confirmed not to have been the cause.

The CDC reports that this batch of cases was detected in October and November 2021 at children's hospitals in Alabama.
There is no geographical link between the cases, with the children all coming from different parts of the state. The agency did not give specifics as to what part of the state the children were from.

All were eventually treated within the Children's of Alabama health system. Two required liver transplants and fully recovered, and none of the patients died.

While the CDC did not give specific ages for each of the patients, it did reveal that five of them were two years old or younger, one was either three or four years old and three were aged five or six.

Six of the children were Hispanic-white, while the other three were non-Hispanic-white.

Investigators revealed that the most common symptoms were vomiting and diarrhea, with more than half of the children suffering a fever as well.

57212887-10768329-image-a-35_1651251500122.jpg


After a further physical examination eight of the nine children were discovered to be suffering from scleral icterus, a condition where a person's skin and eyes turn yellow.

Six others also were found to be suffering from jaundice, a lung condition that displays itself in similar ways.

Each was also given a PCR test to determine if they had any viral infections - general considered to be the cause of the liver disease developing.

All nine were confirmed to have the adenovirus, while none had Covid, effectively ending speculation that the virus that caused a global pandemic over the past two years is directly responsible.

Wisconsin health officials also told DailyMail.com this week that the four cases detected in the midwestern state - including the lone death that has occurred from hepatitis so far - were also caused by the adenovirus.

The adenovirus is generally paired with a common cold, though it can develop into more serious conditions like pneumonia in severe infections.

Dr Kathryn Smith, a pediatric transplant hepatologist at Johns Hopkins University, told DailyMail.com that the adenovirus may not quite be the cause, though.

She notes that the virus could just coincidentally have been found in the cases, and because it was not found in the actual liver tissue of any cases so far it is possible that it is not the culprit.

'[Adenovirus] is common, people get it often and usually presents with diarrhea vomiting something as it can present with, you know, respiratory symptoms,' she said.

'But generally, it's it's pretty you know, common in the community, but it generally doesn't cause this kind of dramatic presentation.'
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Poll: Less than One-Quarter of Americans Say Federal Government Should Set Rules for Mask-Wearing on Planes
Hannah Bleau
29 Apr 2022

Less than a quarter of Americans believe the federal government should set rules for mask-wearing on planes, an RMG Research/Scott Rasmussen survey released this week found.

The Scott Rasmussen National Survey, taken April 21-23, 2022, among 1,200 registered voters, asked respondents who they believe should be in charge of making mask rules for travelers.

A plurality, 46 percent, said individuals should make that choice and “decide for themselves whether or not to wear masks on planes.” Just over a quarter, 26 percent, said each individual airline should make that determination. Just 23 percent, however, expressed the belief that the federal government “should set rules for wearing masks on planes.” Another six percent remain unsure.

Overall, 61 percent said the absence of mask rules will generally make passengers enjoy their flights more, and a plurality, 48 percent, said it is time to allow mask mandates to expire, compared to 37 percent who said the government should appeal the federal judge’s ruling, freeing Americans from the burden of forced masking.

The survey’s margin of error is +/- 2.8 percent and comes as the Biden administration appeals United States District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle’s ruling nixing the federal mask mandate.

She concluded that the mandate “exceeded the CDC statutory authority, improperly invoked the good cause exception to notice and comment rulemaking, and failed to adequately explain its decisions.”

“Because our system does not permit agencies to act unlawfully even in the pursuit of desirable ends, the court declares unlawful and vacates the mask mandate,” the Trump-appointee wrote in part.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), however, asked the Department of Justice (DOJ) to appeal the ruling, contending that “an order requiring masking in the indoor transportation corridor remains necessary for the public health.”

However, for the time being, U.S. travelers are free from the burden of forced masking, as the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is not enforcing Biden’s rule, and major airlines have lifted the mask rules, making it optional.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Dept. of Defense Study Shows Pregnant Female Soldiers Are Experiencing “Absolutely Catastrophic Rate of Abnormalities and Fetal Problems” – Dr. Naomi Wolf Drops a Bomb on the War Room (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Published April 29, 2022 at 9:39pm

Last April, researchers began investigating the link between COVID and menstruation after THOUSANDS of women reported changes to their cycle after getting the coronavirus vaccine.

Women who received the Covid vaccine reported spotting between their cycles, shortened cycles, and lengthened cycles.
According to the study published in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, many women vaccinated against Covid saw a change in their menstrual cycle.

“Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is associated with a small change in cycle length but not menses length,” the study concluded.

However, anyone who spoke about a link between Covid vaccines and menstrual problems/fertility issues was labeled a “conspiracy theorist.”

Then in February 2022, the European Medicines Agency’s risk assessment committee announced that it would review reports of menstruation irregularities after thousands of women have reported changes to their monthly cycle after getting the COVID vaccine.

“After reviewing the available evidence, the PRAC decided to request an in-depth evaluation of all available data, including reports from spontaneous reporting systems, clinical trials, and the published literature,” according to the news release.
On Friday, former Clinton advisor Dr. Naomi Wolf joined Steve Bannon on The War Room to discuss her latest crowd-sourced research on the COVID vaccines and pregnancy.

This was an absolutely shocking segment.

Dr. Naomi Wolf: Report shows that pregnant women were excluded from the trials before they concluded it was safe and effective. They concluded it was safe and effective based on mice and the autopsies of mice fetuses. And horrifically, the Department of Defense data shows that female soldiers’ pregnancies are experiencing an absolutely catastrophic rate of abnormalities and fetal problems…

Via The War Room:

13 min 6 sec
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

‘What I’ve Seen in the Last 2 Years Is Unprecedented’: Physician on COVID Vaccine Side Effects on Pregnant Women
Former Pfizer VP: 'Adverse impacts on conception and ability to sustain a pregnancy were foreseeable'
By Enrico Trigoso
April 27, 2022 Updated: April 29, 2022

Dr. James Thorp is an extensively published 68-year-old physician MD board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, who has practiced obstetrics for over 42 years.

Thorp told The Epoch Times that he sees 6,000–7,000 high-risk pregnant patients a year and has seen many complications among them due to the COVID vaccines.

“I’ve seen many, many, many complications in pregnant women, in moms and in fetuses, in children, offspring,” Thorp said, “fetal death, miscarriage, death of the fetus inside the mom.

“What I’ve seen in the last two years is unprecedented,” Thorp asserted.

Thorp explained that although he has seen an increase in fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with the COVID-19 vaccination, attempts to quantify this effect are hampered by the imposition of gag orders on physicians and nurses that were imposed in September 2021, as reviewed in the publication “Patient Betrayal: The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship” (pdf).

At the beginning of January, the FDA was ordered to release its first large batch of documents related to Pfizer’s COVID jab trials, of which over 10,000 of about 450,000 pages have been made public so far.

From the first day of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine rollout on Dec. 1 2020 through Feb. 28, 2021, 1,223 deaths and 42,086 adverse events were reported to Pfizer.

Among the adverse events, particularly alarming are the ones that affected pregnant women. The documents say that there were 274 pregnancy adverse events, of which 75, or 27 percent were “serious.”

“49 non-serious and 75 serious, reported clinical events, which occurred in the vaccinated mothers. Pregnancy related events reported in these cases coded to the [patients] Abortion spontaneous (25), Uterine contraction during pregnancy, Premature rupture of membranes, Abortion, Abortion missed, and Foetal death (1 each). Other clinical events which occurred in more than 5 cases coded to the [patients] Headache (33), Vaccination site pain (24), Pain in extremity and Fatigue (22 each), Myalgia and Pyrexia (16 each), Chills (13) Nausea (12), Pain (11), Arthralgia (9), Lymphadenopathy and Drug ineffective (7 each), Chest pain, Dizziness and Asthenia (6 each), Malaise and COVID-19 (5 each),” reads the previously confidential Pfizer documents (pdf).

The CDC website recommends the COVID vaccines during pregnancy in order to “prevent severe illness and death in pregnant women.”

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also “strongly recommends that pregnant individuals be vaccinated against COVID-19,” adding that pregnant women’s complete vaccination should be a “priority.”

Thorp repeatedly emphasized that it’s not that everybody got their shots when the vaccine was first distributed.
“They were not all administered [on Dec 1, 2020,]” Thorp said. “All the lots that were sent out were deep-frozen on-site and then they were administered slowly over that eight weeks.”

The amount of BioNTech vaccines shipped worldwide at the time has been redacted in the aforementioned document.

Why did they redact that? That would have been unbelievable information that would give you the exact numerator and denominator,” Thorp said.

The “general overview” table says that there were 29,914 “cases” related to females, 9,182 in males, and 2,990 people with “no data,” of which 19,582 are “recovered/recovering,” 11,361 “not recovered at the time of the report” and 1,223 “fatal.”

Former Pfizer VP Had Given Warnings

Michael Yeadon is a big pharma veteran with 32 years in the industry. He retired from Pfizer whilst occupying the most senior research position in that field.

“On December 1, 2020, We detailed a series of mechanistic toxicology concerns which we believed were reasonable to hold, unless & until proven not to occur,” Yeadon said in a statement to The Epoch Times.

“Among those was that adverse impacts on conception and ability to sustain a pregnancy were foreseeable.”

“It’s important to note that none of these gene-based agents had completed what’s called ‘reproductive toxicology.’ Over a year later, this battery of tests in animals still has not been done. So there was and still is no data package supporting safety in pregnancy or prior to conception.”

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Yeadon detailed the concerns on the issue: the spike protein from the virus encoded in the vaccines was related to a minor extent to syncytin that plays a crucial part in the carrying of a baby to term.

Yeadon had hoped, back then, that their concerns were paid attention to, since they had already seen the tragedy of thalidomide, a sedative drug that caused congenital malformation, over 60 years ago.

“During 2021, I came across two further pieces of evidence which made it much more likely that there’d be adverse effects on pregnancy from COVID-19 ‘vaccines.'”

“It looked like someone had tried to dismiss our concerns by testing for evidence of the particular problem we’d warned about in Dec. 2020. Unfortunately, all they did is to reinforce our concerns. We’d envisioned the risk that, in responding to the synthetic piece of virus spike protein, women’s immune systems would also make an immune response to their own placental protein,” Yeadon said. “That’s exactly what was reported in the pre-print paper.”

“Based on this concern alone, all of these experimental products as a class should have been completely contraindicated in women younger than menopause.”

mRNA Products Accumulate in Ovaries

Another concern that they had not initially noticed was that “the mRNA products (Pfizer & Moderna) would accumulate in ovaries,” Yeadon stated.

“An FOI request to the Japanese Medicines Agency revealed that product accumulation in ovaries occurred in experiments in rodents. I searched the literature based on these specific concerns and found a 2012 review, explicitly drawing attention to the evidence that the lipid nanoparticle formulations as a class do, in fact, accumulate in ovaries and may represent an unappreciated reproductive risk to humans. This was ‘a well known problem’ to experts in that field.”

A 2012 study says that after testing with different mouse species and Wistar rats, “a high local accumulation of nanoparticles, nanocapsules and nanoemulsions in specific locations of the ovaries was found in all animals.”

Referring to the study, Yeadon told The Epoch Times that “The authors tell untruths. They say something like ‘there was no increase in anti-syncytin-1 antibodies.'”

“No, that’s wrong. Their data is clearly 2.5X increased after vaccination and obviously statistically significant (functional significance is looking confirmed by the miscarriage rate),” Yeadon noted.

“What they’ve done is cute. They’ve chosen a completely arbitrary level they scribed on the figure below which they claim nothing matters. No evidence whatsoever for that claim. In fact, in the discussion, they confess we don’t know the relationship between antibodies and the impact on function.”

The former Pfizer VP believes that the pharmaceutical industry “definitely knew,” since 2012, that the lipid nanoparticles would accumulate in the ovaries of women that took the vaccines.

“No one in the industry or in leading media could claim ‘they didn’t know about these risks to successful pregnancy.'”
A lipid nanoparticle is an extremely small particle, it’s a fat-soluble membrane that is the cargo of the messenger RNA, Thorp said.

“From data that we have, there appears to be a concentration of the lipid nanoparticles, which are very, very small particles, which are in the vaccine that are injected into the arm,” Thorp said, “and then the vast majority of those are dispersed throughout the entire body.”

“They appear to concentrate in the ovaries, and they appear to cross all God-made barriers in the human body, the blood-brain barrier, the placental barrier during pregnancy, into the fetal bloodstream, and all the fetal tissues inside the womb, crossing the blood-brain barrier in the fetus, the baby in the womb, which is very concerning,” he noted, since the eggs produced by women are limited in number, and they would be “exposed to a potentially disastrous toxic lipid nanoparticle.”

Dr. Christiane Northrup is a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist with more than 30 years of experience and the former president of the American Holistic Medical Association. She also served on their board during the 80s and early 90s.

She told The Epoch Times last October about how were women being affected by the vaccines.

“Women are having bleedings. The doctors in our area are doing hysterectomies in young women, like 30-somethings, they said, ‘Oh, it’s not unusual.’ Let me tell you, as a board-certified gynecologist, that’s very unusual. Women’s periods are messed up all over the place … I’ve had a huge Facebook group of thousands of women talking about this situation that was removed,” Northrup said.

“My profession is famous for embracing treatments that later on turn into disasters: For example the drug thalidomide that results in limb effects in hundreds of babies, the Dalkon shield IUD that was touted as the birth control method of choice for women who had never had children—and then made hundred of them sterile from infection. And of course, there is DES (diethylstilbestrol) that was given to thousands of women for nausea of pregnancy—and results in reproductive abnormalities in both male and female offspring—including sterility,” Northrup added on Tuesday.

Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to requests for comment.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

EXCLUSIVE: Hundreds of CDC Employees Haven’t Received COVID-19 Vaccine
By Zachary Stieber
April 28, 2022 Updated: April 29, 2022

Nearly 400 employees at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) haven’t received a COVID-19 vaccine, according to data obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times.

A total of 382 workers at the CDC are unvaccinated, Roger Andoh, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) officer at the agency, told The Epoch Times.

Another nine employees have just had one dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, meaning they also don’t qualify as fully vaccinated per the CDC’s guidelines.

Collectively, the number is 3.2 percent of the CDC’s workforce.

Andoh initially pointed to a statement from the government that contained data as of December 2021 and declined to fully answer The Epoch Times’ FOIA request, which asked for more detailed figures that were current as of March 15.

“Please note that this is the most recent and most complete data available and some data elements that you requested are not available,” Andoh said initially.

When asked to clarify, another CDC officer repeated Andoh’s statement.

After The Epoch Times filed an appeal to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the CDC’s parent agency, the office changed its stance without explaining why.

“After an additional search, we are providing you with the following information,” Andoh said in the new response.

“The response I got to your appeal from CDC gave me the impression they didn’t mean to withhold any information in the first place,” Jonathan Nelson, a FOIA analyst with HHS, told The Epoch Times in an email. “Based on that, my (personal) belief is that this was just an accidental omission on their part.”

In addition to revealing that 391 employees weren’t fully vaccinated, the CDC said that 12,399 were fully vaccinated, meaning that they had received two doses of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines or the single-shot Johnson & Johnson jab.

Additionally, 5,810 employees shared that they had received a booster dose, although the agency stressed that employees don’t have to say whether they’ve had a booster.

The CDC also disclosed that the agency had granted zero requests for exemption to President Joe Biden’s federal worker vaccine mandate, which is poised to take effect on May 31 after a months-long suspension due to a court ruling.

The CDC’s media office didn’t reply when asked what would happen to unvaccinated workers who don’t have an exemption, and why no exemptions had been granted.

The data were current as of April 12.

Three other health agencies inside HHS that are deeply involved in promoting COVID-19 vaccination and refused to provide data beyond December 2021 still have not provided the figures requested. They are the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the National Institutes of Health.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1QQGa3eMhQ
TWiV 895: COVID-19 clinical update #112 with Dr. Daniel Griffin
36 min 17 sec
Apr 30, 2022
Vincent Racaniello

In COVID-19 clinical update #112, Dr. Griffin reviews seroprevalence of infection-induced antibodies, Moderna filing for vaccine authorization in young children, public health impact of vaccines in US, FDA approval of first treatment for young children, phase 2 data for Sabizabulin, and post infection inflammation. Show notes at https://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-895/
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Contracting COVID-19 might increase your risk of type 1 diabetes
by Eva Botkin-Kowacki, Northeastern University
April 29, 2022

People who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 may be at a higher risk of developing the autoimmune disease Type 1 diabetes, according to a study of more than 27 million people across the United States.

Researchers found that patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, were 42% more likely to develop Type 1 diabetes than those who did not contract COVID-19 during the study period.

The risk is highest among the youngest of pediatric patients (those under the age of 1 were at an increased risk of 584%) and elevated among older adult patients with COVID-19. The researchers also observed differences across race and ethnicity, with risk of Type 1 diabetes associated with a COVID-19 infection being most pronounced among American Indian/Alaskan Native (130% increased risk), Asian/Pacific Islander (101%), and Black patients (59%).

"Particularly in pediatric populations, [COVID-19] is not usually a life-threatening, oftentimes not serious, condition. But Type 1 diabetes is usually a lifetime illness that requires dramatic amounts of contact with the medical community, increases your risk of death, increases your risk of long-term comorbidity," says Trenton Honda, clinical professor and associate dean in Northeastern's Bouvé College of Health Sciences, and a member of the research team led by Fares Qeadan at Loyola University Chicago.

"Our interest is really looking at the question, "Are there going to be hidden costs, even among those who are not at high risk from COVID itself, because of COVID, later on?'" Honda says.

The scientists also probed whether patients who had Type 1 diabetes before contracting COVID-19 were more likely to suffer a serious, life-threatening complication called diabetic ketoacidosis after being infected with the virus. They found that those patients who had Type 1 diabetes and then were infected had a 126% increased risk of developing diabetic ketoacidosis compared to those who did not get infected. Their results were published in the journal PLOS One earlier this month.

Honda uses the word "association" when referring to the increased risk, careful not to say that a COVID-19 infection causes Type 1 diabetes onset.

"We are the first study in the U.S. population in a really, really big national dataset to be able to say that people who got COVID appear to be at higher risk of developing Type 1 diabetes, although we're not able to say that COVID caused that increased risk. It could be any number of things," he says. To establish that causal connection, Honda says, researchers would need to do a randomized controlled trial. Instead, the team looked at the anonymized data of more than 27 million people who came into contact with hospital medical care across the U.S. from December 2019 through the end of July 2021.

There's other evidence that links COVID-19 infection to increased risk of being diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. SARS-CoV-2 is not the first virus to be associated with an increased risk of Type 1 diabetes onset. It has also been linked to several viral infections such as mumps, rubella, cytomegalovirus, and Epstien-Barr virus.

It all comes down to the pancreas.

All of the cells in your body rely on sugar (glucose) for fuel, Honda explains. But some cells require prompting by a hormone called insulin in order to absorb glucose from the blood. Insulin is produced by the pancreas in response to changes in blood sugar.

Type 2 diabetes is typically an issue of insulin resistance developing in those cells that require it. But Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease, Honda explains. "Essentially your body produces antibodies and immune cells that go in and destroy the cells that produce insulin. So you end up with this precipitously low insulin level over time. And what that means is that the cells in our body that need insulin to get sugar into them stop using sugar and they start using fats. And by doing so, they change the entire metabolism of the body and institute an acidotic state that ultimately is fatal."

Before what Honda calls "one of the greatest moments in all of medical history" when insulin was purified from pigs, Type 1 diabetes was a death sentence. Now, it's a lifelong disease that is survivable with glucose monitoring and insulin injections.

With other viruses, scientists think that the way the virus invades the cells in the pancreas causes them to spontaneously die, Honda explains. And when they die, the immune system mobilizes to destroy those dead cells. The idea, he says, is that this might foster the development of an autoimmune response to those cells—and it could get out of control and continue attacking those vital insulin-producing cells in the pancreas.

"This is the way that other viruses are presumed to lead to Type 1 diabetes," Honda says. "So that's the logic behind this study."

This study focused on COVID-19 cases in the absence of vaccines. Honda says the next big question is to determine whether immunization against SARS-CoV-2 is linked to any further or minimized risk of Type 1 diabetes.

The research team also aims to study associations between 40 other autoimmune diseases and COVID-19 infections.

"If we think about just the burden of disease that COVID causes, it's quite possible that the immediate disease is going to have a much, much smaller impact, particularly on people who are at low risk from the disease itself," Honda says. "And we might end up with a huge number of lifelong disorders that develop…from the exposure to COVID."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Denmark Halts COVID Vaccination, in Ominous Sign for the Boosted
Denmark Realized the Danger of Vaccination
Igor Chudov
Apr 28

Hat tip to Steve Kirsch, who wrote about Denmark stopping its COVID vaccination program.

The original article is here. And here. And here. Rejoice.



A formerly pro-vaccine country halting vaccination is a very ominous sign. It means that Denmark is scared of Covid vaccines. It does not want any more Danes to get “vaccinated”. It wants the remaining vaccine-free Danes to REMAIN UNVACCINATED.

How do I know?

You do not stop a program if it is “successful” and the threat is still there.

The reason they gave us — that the pandemic is under control — does not withstand scrutiny. It is anything but under control in Denmark: the deaths are beginning to rise again, the cases (grossly undercounted now) are close to the peak of Nov 2020-Jan 2021 when vaccination was seen as an answer to everything, and the ratio of deaths to official cases is about 1%, which suggests that Covid is still a dangerous illness, even for generally (formerly) healthy Danes. By all accounts, Covid is alive and well and is still killing people. Why halt vaccines?

They did not have to halt their vaccination program if they still thought highly about vaccines. After all, every day young Danes turn 12 and become eligible. Why deny those young kids vaccination, if in the opinion of the Danish government, Covid vaccines are “safe and effective”? It makes no sense.

Their statement that “they might resume vaccination in the fall” is the most hilarious distraction.

Even if Covid vaccine was generally seen as merely somewhat useless, Denmark did not have to halt vaccination. Denmark count simply downplay vaccination, just to save its government some embarrassment.

They halted it for a reason. The reason is that the Danish government realized the danger of vaccines, and wants to save the remaining unvaccinated Danes from getting the shot — even if the kids vaccine-crazed parents want them vaccinated.

Again, this is the only explanation that makes logical sense — no other stated reasons would logically lead to the outright halt of vaccination.

What did the Danish government realize? That Chronic Covid in the boosted is because of the vaccine? That even a booster dose is useless for the most vulnerable groups? That Moderna hid the fact that the vaccinated never get true immunity after inevitable “breakthroughs”? That Covid vaccine kills more than it saves, as Steve Kirsch keeps reminding us?

We do not know yet. Some day, we will know.

Even though the Danish government did have the conscience to halt vaccinations, Danes still need to investigate why they were poisoned by their government, which participated in a reckless, corrupt and unsuccessful worldwide experiment on two billion people, including young people who never faced danger from Covid. People need to ask why they were lied to, and who will pay their medical and funeral expenses.

You can halt the experiment. But you cannot halt the consequences.

Good luck.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Denmark will stop promoting COVID vaccinations on May 15, 2022
They realize stopping the spread is useless. They are stopping all promotion of the COVID vaccines on May 15, 2022, the first country to do so.
Steve Kirsch
Apr 28

Watch this video by Dr. John Campbell about Denmark’s COVID policies starting at 3:00 to 4:00. He says towards the end of the minute, “Isn’t it great to see a national medical leader with the sheer guts to reflect the accurate science. It’s just excellent. Very, very pleased to see the courage that Tyra Krause has demonstrated.”



What’s remarkable is this: the video has been up for more than 24 hours and has not been banned from YouTube.
That means what Campbell said is, by definition, not misinformation.

So now we know that starting with omicron, it is impossible to stop the spread of infection, even with severe restrictions!

Denmark is stopping all vaccinations on May 15, 2022, the first country to do so

See this story.

But let’s be clear: anyone that wants the vaccine can still get it. The change is that the government will stop sending out digital posts with invitations to get the vaccine. See this tweet.

And they reserve the right to start promoting it again.

So even in Denmark, they are still not paying attention to the science (see my article on the three papers if you haven’t already) and haven’t realized the vaccines are dangerous (even though the key paper on zero ACM is from Denmark).
But at least they are willing to take the first baby step and stop promoting it.

Jesse Morgan wrote in the comments:

Denmark is moving in the right direction, but still won't mention anything negative about these vaccines. Doing so may be a bit too much too fast for them. Perhaps they are unboiling the frog? Let's hope.
Or, in the immortal words of my good friend Sage Hana (who summarized it perfectly):

Denmark will suspend vaccine invitations, jabs still available, and will probably be back in the Fall, even if they don't work and Omicron is impossible to stop.

Other countries should follow Denmark’s lead and stop vaccinations. This is validated by YouTube!

Campbell then says (at 4:19), “As soon as other countries follow this lead, the better.”

Again, this was not censored by YouTube so this is also true.

YouTube approved!

So there you go. YouTube has affirmed that:
  1. It is useless to stop the spread of the virus, even with severe restrictions
  2. Vaccination promotion will stop on May 15, and as soon as other countries follow this lead, the better.
As we all know, there is no higher authority on health information than the YouTube censors. So there you have it.

Summary

So now we have signs of intelligent life in both Tennessee and Denmark.

Tennessee has made ivermectin available without a prescription and Denmark has realized mitigation is useless and is stopping vaccination promotion.

It’s a good start.

But just to be on the safe side, I’d like to suggest you watch Campbell’s video on YouTube before they take it down.

After all, nowadays, the science can change in minutes.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Denmark becomes the first country to halt its Covid vaccination program
Holly Ellyatt
Published Thu, Apr 28 20223:26 AM EDT Updated Thu, Apr 28 202210:20 AM EDT

Key Points
  • Denmark has become the first country to halt its Covid vaccination program, saying it is doing so because the virus has been brought under control.
  • "Spring has arrived, vaccine coverage in the Danish population is high, and the epidemic has reversed," Danish Health Authority said in a statement Wednesday announcing the move.
  • Far from scrapping its vaccination program altogether, however, the Danish Health and Medicines Authority said there will probably be a need to vaccinate against Covid-19 again in the fall.

Health personnel are preparing injection syringes with Covid-19 vaccine in 2021 in Copenhagen, Denmark. the country has now announced it will suspend its vaccination program and will review whether it's needed later in the year.

Denmark has become the first country to halt its Covid vaccination program, saying it is doing so because the virus is now under control.

"Spring has arrived, vaccine coverage in the Danish population is high, and the epidemic has reversed," the Danish Health Authority said in a statement Wednesday.

"Therefore, the National Board of Health is now ending the broad vaccination efforts against Covid-19 for this season," it said. People will not be invited for vaccines from May 15, it said, although everyone will be able to finish their course of vaccination.

Denmark's Covid vaccination campaign began soon after Christmas in 2020. Some 4.8 million citizens have been vaccinated, the health authority said, with more than 3.6 million people receiving a booster shot.

At the same time, many people have been infected since the omicron variant became the dominant strain of the virus, it said, meaning immunity levels among the population are high.

"We are in a good place," Bolette Soborg, unit manager at the National Board of Health, commented.

"We have good control of the epidemic, which seems to be subsiding. Admission rates [to hospitals] are stable and we also expect them to fall soon. Therefore, we are rounding up the mass vaccination program against Covid-19."

Soborg insisted that the public can still be vaccinated over the spring and summer if they want, and that vaccination sites will remain open around the country.

He added that immunization was still recommended to people for whom Covid poses a heightened risk, such as those over the age of 40 and for unvaccinated pregnant women. "We also continue to recommend that you complete your started vaccination course," he said.

Vaccinations likely to resume

Denmark's move to suspend its vaccination program comes as the Covid situation around the world remains mixed. Europe and the U.S. have abandoned most Covid restrictions, but China is still imposing (or considering) lockdowns as the virus spreads in major cities like Shanghai and Beijing.

Far from scrapping its vaccination program altogether, however, the Danish Health and Medicines Authority said there will probably be a need to vaccinate against Covid-19 again in the fall as the virus continues to mutate.

New variants have emerged over the course of the pandemic, which is now into its third year. These have eroded the efficacy of the Covid vaccines that were developed in record time in 2020, although the shots authorized for use in the West remain effective at preventing serious infection, hospitalization and death from Covid-19.

With the vaccination program likely to restart in a few months' time, Denmark's health experts will be looking at who should be vaccinated, when the shots should be given and which vaccines should be used.

The Danish Health and Medicines Authority said it would continue to follow the development of the epidemic closely, and is ready to restart vaccination efforts again if there is a need to immunize additional target groups before the fall.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

No More COVID Shots? Denmark Halts Vaccine Program For Now
By Dawn Geske
04/28/22 AT 8:18 AM

Denmark is the first country to put a stop to its COVID vaccination program, citing no current need for shots because the “epidemic has reversed.”

The Danish Health Authority said that the nation is in a “good position” with a high number of citizens vaccinated, falling COVID cases, and stabilized hospitalization rates.

However, the DHA said that it could open COVID vaccinations later this year. "We plan to reopen the vaccination program in the fall,” Bolette Soborg, Head of Unit at the Danish Health Authority, said in a statement.

“Prior to this, a thorough professional assessment must be made of who and when to vaccinate and with which vaccines. We expect to present a plan for the overall framework for the 2022/23 season before the summer holidays,” she added.

As many as 81% of all Danish residents (4.8 million people) have received two doses of the COVID vaccine with 62% or 3.6 million citizens also receiving a booster shot, Soborg told the Agence France-Presse, as reported by The Independent.

“Vaccination coverage is thus sky-high,” Soborg said. “At the same time, many have been infected after the Omicron variant became the dominant one. The total immunity of the population is therefore high.

According to the infectious disease expert, shot invitations will end on May 15 and then resume in the fall if the “unstable virus” mutates like was seen with the Omicron variant.

“You can still get vaccinated over the spring and summer, and we still recommend vaccination to people at particularly increased risk of a severe course of COVID-19 disease,” Soborg said. “This is especially true for people over the age of 40 and for pregnant women if they are unvaccinated. We also continue to recommend that you complete your vaccination course.”

The DHA, which began its COVID vaccination program on Dec. 27, 2020, said it will restart the vaccination program early if the need arise as it keeps a close eye on what it now calls an epidemic.

The agency is still recommending a fourth shot for those with weakened immune systems or those with multiple diseases but said it will assess the need for a fourth vaccination for a wider population groups going forward.

The move by Denmark comes after it announced the removal of all pandemic restrictions back in February, with government officials saying at the time that the virus was no longer considered a critical threat to the country.

Denmark was the first EU country to roll back all of its pandemic-related restrictions, despite seeing a surge in Omicron cases. Officials said that the Omicron variant was not putting a heavy burden on its healthcare system, the Independent reported.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Is there any EVIDENCE that old people should get the shot?
Some people claim that if you are old with multiple comorbidities, you should get the shot. But where is the evidence? Apparently, it doesn't exist.
Steve Kirsch
13 hr ago

Overview
  1. Some people claim that elderly people with multiple comorbidities should take the COVID vaccines and boosters.
  2. The all-cause mortality data required to make such claims should be readily available to the public but isn’t.
  3. Nobody I know has seen any data that would justify these claims.
  4. It is unethical to recommend vaccination in any age group without clear and compelling data of an all-cause risk-benefit. Where is the risk-benefit analysis?
  5. If there was all-cause mortality data that supported the “safe and effective” narrative, it’s highly likely we’d all know about it.
  6. This is more evidence of a very corrupt system that no one in the mainstream medical community or media finds objectionable.
Introduction


Slide 54 from “All you need to know” showing unfavorable risk-benefit ratio for vaccination of the elderly and a 3% death rate per dose

Among people who believe the vaccines are unsafe, there are still a few people who still believe it is recommended for older people.

Arguments that claim the vaccines are safe either mix timeframes or they ignore deaths from the vaccine

One doctor told me a story like the following, “I know of nursing homes where 30% of the residents died from COVID before the vaccines came out. And since we all know that the vaccines are 90% effective, even if the kill rate from the vaccine is 25% for the elderly, there is still a positive risk-benefit.”

Nope, that’s not convincing at all. There’s a lot of survivor bias here. If the first wave of COVID wiped out 30% of the elderly, then many of the people who remain are already immune from the virus. So giving them the shot at that point has likely no benefit at all, only downsides. For a fair comparison, we must compare the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated groups from the time the vaccines were first made available.

Other people just look at the death rates from COVID and claim that the per capita death rates are lower in people who have been boosted. Even if that were true, it’s irrelevant because it ignores the possibility the vaccine can kill people.

The VAERS data showed nobody should take the vaccine

When I looked at the VAERS data in October 2021, I found that the vaccines couldn’t be justified for any age group. Even if the vaccines worked as promised, they killed more people than they might have theoretically saved.

I’m open to being convinced I got it wrong, but nobody wants to show me any real-world data.

Here’s a comment from one of my readers (bold part is my emphasis):

At the very beginning of the injection campaigns which started in German nursing homes at the start of 2021, in some cases there were 25-35% deceased soon after each 'vaccination' campaign. Acu2020 (Reiner Fuellmich) interviewed a few whistleblowers from those places, it was really heartbreaking to listen to this. Elderly were dying alone, and families were not allowed to be with them. How long can we all stand for this, but most importantly, allow it to happen?​

So we should not be ignoring the deaths caused by the vaccines. We need to be looking at what’s known as “all-cause mortality” which would factor in any deaths caused by the vaccine itself.

This is the data everyone needs to see: just two numbers

I’m not asking for a randomized trial. I’m just asking for the two numbers that are required to support the claims being made:
  1. What is the rate of all-cause mortality of the elderly who got the booster?
  2. What is the rate of all-cause mortality of the elderly who didn’t get vaccinated at all?
To obtain the two numbers, you’re basically following 1,000 matched elderly patients in both groups from December 19, 2020 forward, and counting the total all-cause mortality deaths from the day before they got their very first shot to 3 months after their third shot with the total # of deaths in the matched group who got no shots (over a matched timeframe). You’d match patients in each group so you are tracking patients over the same time range in each group (starting at when they got the shot). That’s the proper way to do the risk-benefit assessment.

Any person with a working brain would want to see these two numbers to justify recommending the vaccines.

Doctors aren’t asking for the data required for a proper risk-benefit analysis; they are recommending the vaccine based on the patently false assumption that the vaccines don’t kill anyone

So it is astonishing to me that:
  1. The risk-benefit study using all-cause mortality data has never been done. If it had been done and the result was positive, they’d be publicizing this widely. I suspect they’ve done the analysis, saw the results, and killed the study so nobody would know.
  2. No member of the mainstream medical community is demanding to see this data before making a recommendation to patients. There is no excuse for this. It’s completely irresponsible and reprehensible. Even President Obama, who is a self-proclaimed expert on COVID-19 misinformation, has not called for this data. You should always be very suspicious when nobody is calling for the data that is required to justify their beliefs.
Am I the only guy in the world who is publicly calling for these critical all-cause mortality statistics?

I think so.

This just goes to show you how totally screwed up our medical system is today. Doctors are recommending the vaccine, not based on the data and science, but based on the political science. They don’t even want to see the data. That’s why nobody is publicly calling for it.

It also shows you how corrupt the mainstream media is because, even after my article is published pointing this out, they are still never going to mention this or ask about it.

We are mandating this vaccine for people and nobody wants to see the risk-benefit for the elderly where the benefits are supposed to be the most compelling. Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?


Slide 55 from “All you need to know” showing unfavorable risk benefit for vaccination of the elderly and an 8% death rate from the vaccine


Slide 56 from “All you need to know” showing unfavorable risk benefit for vaccination of the elderly: deaths SKYROCKETED after the vaccines rolled out when they were supposed to PLUMMET

The anecdotal data confirms the VAERS data

The anecdotal data we have that leaks out is all consistent with the jabs being unsafe for all ages. For example,
  1. In the UK, all-cause deaths skyrocketed after the vaccines rolled out (see below)
  2. In Syracuse, NY, deaths skyrocketed after the vaccines rolled out (close to an 8X increase in the death rate)
  3. In Canada, at least 3% of patients at the Sunnycrest nursing home died after the boosters were given
  4. On Oahu, at least 8% of nursing home patients died after the vaccines were rolled out (the COVID death rate was very low)
What the funeral directors found

UK Funeral Director John O’Looney has said deaths skyrocketed after vaccination started. But vaccinations are supposed to save lives, not kill people. The deaths are supposed to plummet after vaccination. That was the whole idea, wasn’t it?

The Washington Post said that “In January and February, unvaccinated people died at … 20 times the rate of people with boosters.” So if that’s true, why did O’Looney’s business go crazy after the vaccines rolled out?

Those who believe that the vaccines saved lives need to explain O’Looney’s observations; he risked his career to let people know about what was going on.

The explanation is simple: we don’t count anyone who died from the shot itself. The people who survive the shot are of course more immune to the spike protein because we killed off the people who were susceptible. So sure, with each dose of the vaccine, we’re going to see more differences in terms of COVID susceptibility. But that’s not what we should be paying attention to at all.

We should be looking at all-cause mortality in the two groups. The two numbers I wrote about earlier.

I’m reaching out to Professor Andrew Noymer since he’s an expert relied upon by the Washington Post

This Washington Post article entitled Covid deaths no longer overwhelmingly among unvaccinated as toll on elderly grows says:

“It’s still absolutely more dangerous to be unvaccinated than vaccinated,” said Andrew Noymer, a public health professor at the University of California at Irvine who studies covid-19 mortality.

Surely the good professor would have evidence to back up his claim. I’ll let you know if he responds.

I have also reached out to California State Epidemiologist Erica Pan who said:

“Vaccines are one of the most important and longest-lasting tools we have to protect ourselves,” said California State Epidemiologist Erica Pan, citing state estimates showing vaccines have shown to be 85 percent effective in preventing death.

Summary

I’m skeptical that the elderly with (or without) multiple comorbidities will benefit from the vaccine because nobody I know has seen the evidence that this is true. If it was true, our good friend O’Looney and other funeral directors would be seeing deaths plummet. And if it was true, embalmers wouldn’t be seeing massive blood clots in up to 93% of their cases.

If there is evidence that the vaccines are beneficial for the elderly, can we see it? Please? And if not, at least tell us why we can’t.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

COVID cases on the rise again, but most appear mild
Natural immunity, vaccinations likely having dampening effect.
By Just the News staff
Updated: April 30, 2022 - 10:38am

Cases of SARS-CoV-2 are on the rise again in nearly every part of the United States, the first time a major rise in infections has been observed since the beginning of the winter surge's decline in January of this year.

Experts noted that the cases in the earliest part of what appears to be a new surge have largely been mild, a sign that natural immunity and vaccinations are keeping more severe cases at bay.

Still, the shifting trend has some public health experts concerned. Daily average cases in the United States have roughly doubled relative to the beginning of this month.

Recent data have indicated that a large majority of Americans have already been infected by the coronavirus, a revelation that — when coupled with vaccine rates — indicates that future waves of COVID may put significantly less strain on local economies and healthcare systems.

Many businesses, governments and other institutions have in the past several months relaxed major mitigation efforts like mask mandates and distancing rules, particularly as infections bottomed out in the wake of the Omicron surge.

Some authorities are reinstating mask mandates out of concerns over the new rise in cases. Mandates have gone into effect again at numerous universities across the country, as well as on some public transportation systems, such as San Francisco's BART.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Michigan Investigated Hundreds of Doctors, Nurses Over COVID-related Complaints
By Alice Giordano
April 28, 2022 Updated: April 30, 2022

Hundreds of nurses and doctors, including a chief medical examiner, have been investigated by the state of Michigan on COVID-related allegations ranging from videotaping a wedding where some guests weren’t wearing masks to telling trick-or-treaters not to get the vaccine.

Authorities dismissed many of the complaints. Dozens are still pending, with a number referred for disciplinary action. Some have been referred to the Michigan Attorney General’s office for criminal prosecution.

An allergy and asthma specialist is the subject of one of the referrals sent to the attorney general. The complaint accuses the doctor of prescribing “a lethal dosage” of ivermectin.

Copies of the complaints, which total more than 500, were provided exclusively to the Epoch Times. The Pacific Justice Institute obtained the records through a FOIA request. The institute represents some of the accused nurses and doctors.

The Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs received and investigated the complaints. Those they have investigated have either been dismissed or referred to its enforcement division for disciplinary action or the AG’s office. Many are listed as still being listed “under board review.” The list provided to the institute includes complaints as recent as February 24, 2022.

One of the nurses the Pacific Justice Institute represents is Holly Austin, a college nursing professor who holds a doctorate in nursing.

She faced the revocation of her license by the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs for speaking at a public school board meeting in December of 2021 as a parent against plans to reinstitute a mask mandate at her children’s school.

Dave Peters, a staff attorney with Pacific Justice Institute, told The Epoch Times he was shocked when the state continued its investigation into Austin even after he submitted a 100-page response to the state’s allegations that she was spreading misinformation.

“I remember not long ago that such actions by government authorities or anybody else would have had the entire journalist community howling about suppression and chilling free speech, ” said Peters, who also holds a master’s degree in medicine.

According to documents Peters provided to The Epoch Times, it took the state more than a year to close the investigation against Austin. The state concluded in a March 3, 2022 letter “that following a thorough review and investigation,” it had “determined a violation of the Public Health Code cannot be substantiated.”

More than 200 doctors and nurses found themselves under investigation just for expressing concerns about the COVID vaccine or for not wearing or promoting the wearing of masks. One doctor was reported for shaking hands with someone who wasn’t wearing a mask; another was the subject of a complaint for claiming he had a bad reaction to the COVID vaccine.

In February, Ljubisa Dragovic, Chief Medical Examiner for Oakland County, found himself under investigation by the state for performing autopsies without wearing a mask.

“When you are working in an environment with deceased individuals there is no active sneezing or coughing on the part of the cadavers. It was nonsense,” Dragovic told The Epoch Times, “you can’t get or give COVID to a dead person.” Dragovic said he couldn’t wear a mask because his glasses would fog up, and he couldn’t see what he was doing.

“The last thing you want to be is blinded while using a sharp scapula,” he said.

Dragovic, who is fully vaccinated and believes in wearing masks around live patients and co-workers, said he spent about two hours answering questions from investigators for the Michigan Medical Licensing Board.

According to Dragovic, another medical examiner filed the complaint. The person was “totally crazed with fear over COVID,” Dragovic said. That doctor was hired at the height of the pandemic to perform autopsies but refused to do so out of fear he would contract COVID-19, even locking himself in his office at times. He eventually quit, according to Dragovic.

The complainant only filed the allegation a year later after Dragovic refused to give the doctor a job reference.

Peters says the case is an example of how the state investigations had nothing to do with keeping the public safe.

“This was used to kill free speech to intimidate people into submission,” he said, “period.”

Dozens of the complaints were againt doctors who issued mask waivers to children. Three nurses were accused of falsifying proof of vaccines, including one who allegedly did so for a friend for a cruise.

The licensing board referred complaints against two physicians and two chiropractors to the Michigan Attorney General’s Office for “not following COVID-19 safety precautions.”

The board investigated several physicians and nurses for either promoting or prescribing ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine.

The complaint against Austin cites an email she wrote to the Brighton School Board that included a compilation of research she had conducted on the harm of wearing masks. She cited over 200 studies.

“I implore you to be informed of the current literature regarding masks and their ineffectiveness to decrease the transmission of COVID-19, the potential and inherent harms of masks on our pediatric population, and the short term and long term sequelae to our youth with continued mask mandates,” Austin wrote.

Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs did not respond to inquiries from The Epoch Times about the investigations.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

New Book Packed With Evidence on Hushed COVID-19 Treatments
Recent studies confirm effectiveness of treatments like zinc, ivermectin—just like Dr. Colleen Huber said 2 years ago
BY Kristen Fischer
April 30, 2022

Recent developments in treating COVID-19, especially in terms of existing therapeutics, are validating what doctors like Colleen Huber knew all along: masks, distancing, ventilators, and vaccines couldn’t resolve the COVID-19 pandemic.

Last year, Huber, a naturopathic medical doctor based in Arizona, published “The Defeat of COVID: 500+ Medical Studies Show What Works & What Doesn’t.” The book details research on COVID-19 treatments and strategies—everything from zinc and hydroxychloroquine to social distancing and masking. She shares studies that explore the effectiveness of the various treatments, preventative measures, and interventions.

The book pays homage to doctors who have tried to promote early treatment using existing medications, vitamins, and supplements—folks like Dr. Vladimir Zelenko and the America’s Frontline Doctors team.

Some of the treatments that many doctors recommended after reviewing the available research include ivermectin, zinc, Azithromycin (Z-Pak), vitamins D and C, as well as turmeric, quercetin, and melatonin.

Many doctors were met with aggressive responses when they endorsed such treatments—or even sought more research to explore their effectiveness on COVID-19. Some doctors had their careers threatened and the mainstream media accused many of them of spreading “misinformation.”

“Countless more scientists and physicians and journalists around the world have faced ostracism by their peers when attempting to objectively view and disseminate data regarding COVID-19 and its impacts,” Huber wrote in the book.

Now, two years after the pandemic began, Huber sees more evidence coming out that the aforementioned treatments are quite effective in treating COVID-19. This comes as the government largely continues to push the vaccine despite reports that it’s not as effective as originally stated and vaccine injury cases mount.

Epoch Times Photo
The Defeat of COVID: 500+ medical studies show what works & what doesn’t By Colleen Huber, 2021

Defeating COVID Head-On

Huber did more than compile a book of research about all the treatments somehow underreported by government and media. She actually treated COVID-19 patients—in person—throughout the pandemic.

“None of the people who came to me with COVID were hospitalized or needed urgent care or died. Not even one person. All recovered uneventfully,” Huber told The Epoch Times.

In Arizona, where Huber is licensed, naturopaths are primary care physicians required to learn, and then licensed to practice, conventional medicine as well as clinical nutrition, botanical medicine, clinical psychology, minor surgery and more. While some states license naturopathic doctors and have strict requirements, others do not.

In Arizona, these doctors are specialists in holistic diagnosis and natural therapeutics. “These physicians are trained to seek out the least invasive intervention required to effect a cure. Often, this is possible with diet counseling and lifestyle modification,” notes the Arizona Naturopathic Medical Association website.

Sharing Information

Even though her book is circulating, Huber said many people have not seen it. In general, people don’t know how easy it is to treat the SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19.

“COVID is easily defeated, very easily defeated,” said Huber. “I knew that back in early 2020, but not everybody did.”

In the book she says SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 “don’t stand a chance against vitamin D or zinc or vitamin C or hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin.”

Huber, who sees the book as a “public service,” hopes people are waking up to the fact that there’s plenty of evidence supporting the solutions in the book.

“I think many people have begun to see that they were lied to by authority figures,” Huber said.

She believes people desire the vaccine less after seeing how many people actually got it, and hearing about how many vaccinated individuals wound up getting the virus. More information continues to pour in about the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccine, such as it’s links to clots, heart inflammation, and cancer. Now we are also hearing about the harms of treatments like Remdesivir.

“Mainstream narrative credibility is sinking very quickly,” she said.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Americans Need to Learn From Extreme Lockdowns in Shanghai: Public Health Expert
By Masooma Haq and Steve Lance
April 30, 2022 Updated: April 30, 2022

Psychiatrist Carole Lieberman, who holds a master’s degree in public health, hopes that Americans will learn from the draconian measures that the citizens of Shanghai, China, are being subjected to under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). She warns that if Americans do not stand up for their freedoms, then authorities may take away more of our fundamental rights in the name of public health.

“Yes, China is the ultimate nightmare,” Lieberman told the host of NTD’s Capitol Report, Steve Lance, in a recent interview. “I hope Americans realize that if we keep being sheep and following all the rules, like the lockdowns and so on in America, we could end up like that.”

The citywide lockdown in Shanghai, China, started on April 1, after a partial lockdown began on the east side of the city on March 28. Currently, Shanghai residents say they are running short on provisions because of the lockdown.

Shanghai residents told the Chinese Epoch Times that they are facing a food crisis. Sealed inside their homes, many residents have taken to social media to plead for help as they are unable to obtain food. In addition, business activity has been severely disrupted, with delays in trucking and deliveries.

Here in the United States, Lieberman said that public health officials seemed to be motivated by power and money, specifically, allowing pharmaceutical companies to profit from the mass vaccine campaign. She said this is wrong because scientists do not know the long-term effects of the vaccines, especially on young children.

“[They are] even going further and saying that the kids have to have vaccines—little kids … It’s questionable what the research says in terms of adults, but there is no way that there could have been enough research in terms of kids because kids have organs that are still developing,” said Lieberman. “So, you don’t know what’s going to happen five years from now.”

Meanwhile, under the Chinese regime’s “zero-COVID” policy, people who test positive are sent to centralized quarantine, including the elderly and children. Reports have recently emerged that crying toddlers were separated from parents in quarantine facilities in Shanghai, sparking outrage over the strict measures.

Lieberman said she has read stories of the CCP using drones to relay messages to building residents, telling them to curb their desire for freedom.

“[The CCP has] been having drones and robots shouting out to people, you know, ‘control your soul’s desire for freedom, control your soul desire for freedom,’ because of the fact that people are protesting and some people are jumping off balconies, and kids are wearing hazmat suits, but you know, [the CCP is] trying to control the protests so that they don’t get out of control.”

Lieberman is critical of public health officials frightening the public into submission and warns that they could try it again if people don’t realize this and stop complying with unscientific rules.

“In America, I think it was a test run to see just how many Americans would become sheep and just follow blindly. It’s the fear, it’s the idea of generating fear that then causes people to just listen to so-called science or so-called arbiters of science, because people are scared.”
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Chinese Regime Locks Down World’s Largest Wholesale Hub Under its Zero-COVID Policy
By Alex Wu
April 30, 2022 Updated: April 30, 2022

The Chinese communist regime has locked down the world’s largest wholesale market—Yiwu City in China’s Zhejiang Province, since April 27 due to a COVID-19 outbreak. Experts believe that the regime’s implementation of the extreme “zero-COVID” policy in the “world’s small commodity capital” will bring a new blow to the global supply chain.

According to a statement posted on Yiwu’s city government’s official social media WeChat account, after 3 local COVID-19 cases were found, authorities ordered all residents not to leave their residential complexes or villages. They closed schools and prevented people from entering public places, government agencies, enterprises, and institutions across the city without a negative nucleic acid certificate within the past 24 hours.

Yiwu, with a population of 1.5 million, brings together more than 2.1 million kinds of commodities, exporting everything from Christmas ornaments to U.S. presidential campaign supplies, to more than 210 countries and regions around the world. In 2021, the express delivery volume reached 9.29 billion pieces.

The city is a major wholesale hub and export center for consumer accessories. Eighty percent of all Chinese Christmas merchandise exports are from Yiwu. Nearly half of all goods exported from the city are destined for the United States.

The shutdown of all communities has already affected the express delivery of goods.

Yiwu Postal Administration stated that all couriers must undergo COVID-19 nucleic acid testing. Some couriers are suspended as they have been to the areas that have positive cases and so they have a “yellow code” on their mandatory health app. It has created shortages of manpower, which affects express delivery and the speed of shipping.

Local officials have been conducting mass testing in the city to implement “zero-COVID” policy.

Ding Xian, former head of Jing’an Branch of Shanghai Huashan Hospital, posted on April 24, pointing out that “zero-COVID” means “repeated nucleic acid testing, overwhelmed staff; huge crowds, and serious cross-infection.”

China accounts for about 12 percent of global trade. The regime’s “zero-COVID” measures have left factories and warehouses idled, hampered truck deliveries, and increased container congestion, further deteriorating global supply chains. After the major ports in east China such as Shanghai and Ningbo were shut down due to the appearance of COVID-19 cases, many companies went to Yiwu to load their containers, and now Yiwu has also been locked down.

Shen Rongqin, a professor at York University in Canada, told The Epoch Times earlier this month that many prosperous Chinese cities such as Shanghai and those in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces have been locked down, which has a great impact on China’s economy. The first impact is the disruption of the supply chain, which has affected the export industry. Secondly, China’s domestic demand has also been hit, with the service industry shrinking the fastest. That will lead to a large number of people losing their jobs.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Pfizer Says Its COVID-19 Pill Paxlovid Fails to Prevent Symptomatic Infection of Household Members
By Gabrielle Stephenson
April 30, 2022 Updated: April 30, 2022

Pfizer announced Friday that a recent large, late-stage trial found that its COVID-19 antiviral pill, Paxlovid, failed at preventing symptomatic infection of people living with a person who has the disease.

The trial enrolled 2,957 participants aged 18 and older who live in the same household as another person who has COVID-19 with symptoms. They were given either Paxlovid or a placebo twice daily for five or 10 days.

Researchers reported that those who took Paxlovid for 5 days were 32 percent less likely to become infected compared to the placebo group. People who took Paxlovid for 10 days were 37 percent less likely to get infected. The results were not statistically significant, however, which means it could possibly be due to chance.

“These results … were not statistically significant and, as such, the primary endpoint of reducing the risk of confirmed and symptomatic COVID-19 infection in adults who had been exposed to the virus through a household contact was not met,” the company said in a release.

“While we are disappointed in the outcome of this particular study, these results do not impact the strong efficacy and safety data we’ve observed in our earlier trial for the treatment of COVID-19 patients at high risk of developing severe illness,” Pfizer Chief Executive Albert Bourla said in a statement.

Paxlovid consists of two different antiviral drugs—nirmatrelvir and ritonavir. It is currently approved or authorized for conditional or emergency use in more than 60 countries to treat COVID-19 patients at high risk of severe illness.

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), ritonavir “may cause liver damage” and so “caution should be exercised when giving Paxlovid to patients with preexisting liver diseases, liver enzyme abnormalities or liver inflammation.”

The FDA also said that using Paxlovid in people with uncontrolled or undiagnosed HIV-1 infection “may lead to HIV-1 drug resistance.”

Pfizer’s announcement comes as researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) are planning to investigate how and why some people who have taken a five-day course of Paxlovid experience a repeat of COVID-19, reported Bloomberg.

Clifford Lane, deputy director for clinical research at NIAID, told the outlet that the issue is “a pretty urgent thing for us to get a handle on.” He said the agency is discussing with scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) about carrying out a number of possible epidemiological and clinical studies to learn about these rebound cases.

Researchers at the VA Boston Healthcare System earlier this week published a preprint (pdf) about a case study of a 71-year-old man who quickly recovered from COVID-19 after taking Paxlovid, only to have a relapse of symptoms and an increase in viral levels just nine days after his first COVID-19 positive test. The symptoms and viral levels resolved days later. The COVID-19 rebound case related to Paxlovid is the first to be documented in medical literature.

Paul Sax, a Harvard Medical School professor and the clinical director of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, told Bloomberg that if people have symptoms that worsen after taking Paxlovid, “it’s probably still COVID.”

Sax on April 25 had reported about a rebound of COVID-19 in one of his HIV patients after the person took Paxlovid.

Reuters contributed to this report.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Top Chinese Officials Offered to Brief US Officials on COVID-19 in Closed-Door Meeting, Emails Reveal
By Eva Fu and Zachary Stieber
April 30, 2022

Top Chinese health officials offered to brief U.S. counterparts on the “new coronavirus in Wuhan” in a closed-door meeting in early 2020, newly obtained emails show.

As health officials in the United States and around the world were scrambling to respond to the emerging COVID-19 outbreak from China, Lance Rodewald, a senior adviser to the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC), floated an offer to have an “informal discussion” regarding the new illness.

“I’m writing to explore whether you may be interested in an informal presentation/briefing/discussion about the novel coronavirus by Dr. Feng Zijian at a side meeting around the time of the February ACIP meeting,” he said in an email dated Jan. 23, 2020, sent to eight U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials.

ACIP is a panel of health experts that advises the CDC on vaccine recommendations. The panel typically meets at the CDC headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia.

The same day Rodewald made the offer, the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus first originated, entered into a full lockdown. The virus had been spreading in the city and around the world undetected as the Chinese regime suppressed crucial information about the outbreak and delayed acknowledging for weeks that the virus could transmit among humans.

The regime was also stonewalling repeated U.S. requests to send experts into China and get on-the-ground data.

Feng was the deputy director for the Chinese CDC at the time. He and Ma Chao, an official with China CDC’s National Immunization Program, were preparing to visit Atlanta for another conference, Rodewald told CDC officials in the email.

“I think that most of you know Dr. Feng Zijian,” he wrote, describing Feng as the architect of China’s National Immunization Advisory Committee. Feng “has visited US CDC many times, including for 6 months during the H1N1 influenza pandemic and in 2016 during an ACIP meeting,” he said.

Feng was leading China’s investigation into and response to the Wuhan virus, Rodewald said. “As such, he knows pretty-much everything about the investigation and response, including the virology, epidemiology, clinical spectrum, and mitigation measures being taken over here.”

Because of Feng’s responsibilities, Rodewald cast doubt on Feng’s ability to make it to the United States, but wanted to gauge whether U.S. officials were interested in meeting him if he did. Ma, he indicated, was more likely to go.

The offer elicited a warm welcome from Anne Schuchat, then the principal deputy director of the CDC.

“If they visit we are delighted to meet on the sidelines of acip,” she wrote back hours later. “Together we can figure out who will be able to meet. Of course I remember Feng Zinjian well.”

Rodewald in reply said it was “great news” to see the “interest and willingness for Feng Zijian to meet at CDC.”

“Many, many thanks,” he wrote in the email closing.

The emails were obtained by The Epoch Times through a Freedom of Information Act request.

It’s unclear whether Chinese officials ended up meeting with CDC officials, though Ma did ultimately travel to the United States.

Minutes from a Global NITAG Network (GNN) meeting that took place on Feb. 24 and Feb. 25 in 2020 show Ma presented during the meeting on off-label vaccinations in China.

Feng’s name didn’t appear.

During the ACIP meeting one day later, Dr. Amanda Cohn, one of the CDC officials on the emails, said that the CDC had hosted the GNN meeting.

“Those meeting attendees will be coming in and out and watching the meeting, both in another space as well as in the room,” Cohn said.

Neither Ma nor Feng appeared during the ACIP meeting, the last to be held in person since the pandemic started.

The CDC, Cohn, and other top CDC officials did not respond to requests for comment.

Queries sent to the Chinese scientists bounced back.

Chinese media did not report on the GNN or the ACIP meetings.

Additional Freedom of Information Act requests have been lodged seeking to confirm whether any Chinese scientists met with U.S. officials before, during, or after the ACIP meeting.

Two ACIP members, Dr. Kevin Ault and Dr. Pablo Sanchez, told The Epoch Times they did not recall speaking with Chinese scientists in Atlanta. A third, Arkansas Health Secretary Jose Romero, said through a spokesperson that he “did not meet with the Chinese scientists.”

Paul Mango, a former Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) official, suggested the Chinese officials might have initiated the offer out of individual goodwill.

“There were some Chinese scientists who wanted to collaborate, yet were perhaps discouraged from doing so by their government,” he told The Epoch Times.

HHS is the CDC’s parent agency.

A number of Chinese doctors were punished by regime authorities in the early days of the pandemic when they tried to warn the public about the virus. A Shanghai lab that published the world’s first COVID-19 virus sequence was shut down the same day.

Chinese media reports show that Rodewald, of China’s CDC, appeared to be an admirer of China’s COVID-19 response.

In a government-sponsored forum in Shanghai in October 2020, he was asked about China’s shortcomings in scientific research in pandemic response efforts.

“You asked the wrong person,” he said while laughing, according to Chinese media reports. “I really respect the measures China has taken in fighting the outbreak. I’m just a witness.” He added that other countries should learn from how China traced and isolated close contacts of the infected.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

AstraZeneca Says Its COVID-19 Shot Still Has Role Despite Global Glut
By Reuters
April 30, 2022

AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine still has a role to play in the fight against the pandemic, even as sales slow and the company charges more in some places, CEO Pascal Soriot said on Friday, the latest drugmaker to warn about a global supply glut.

The comments come after the company reported better-than-expected first-quarter profit and sales driven by the vaccine, its second bestseller last year raking in $3.9 billion. It also confirmed its forecast that 2022 sales of the shot would fall.

The vaccine, branded as Vaxzevria and Covishield, has struggled to compete with rivals made by Pfizer and Moderna using mRNA technology, and has hit setbacks with production, rare side-effects, and relatively limited shelf life. Approval in the United States has been delayed.

Soriot said the shot, which was seen early in the pandemic as the inoculation of choice for low-income countries, should remain relevant because it’s easy to administer and distribute.

Volume will ease, though, because people will probably only need one booster.

“We are no longer in a period of scarcity of vaccine supply—we have oversupply everywhere around the world. So what is out there needs to be used and then of course we’ll be able to get a better sense for reordering,” he said on a media call.

Rival Johnson & Johnson this month pulled its sales forecast for its COVID-19 vaccine, blaming oversupply on hesitancy in developing countries.

So far, 2.9 billion shots of the AstraZeneca vaccine have been delivered globally.

In the first quarter, the company recorded $1.15 billion in sales for the product, the majority of which came from initial contracts, but that number eclipsed analysts’ consensus forecast of $739 million, cited by Credit Suisse.

The company has started earning a modest profit on the vaccine, which was initially sold at-cost, but it will continue selling in low-income countries on a non-profit basis.

Apart from the vaccine, AstraZeneca also has a COVID-19 treatment, Evusheld, which has been authorized in many regions including the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union for preventing infections in people whose immune system is too weak to respond to vaccines.

The drug generated $469 million in first-quarter revenue, below the consensus forecast of $480 million, cited by Credit Suisse.

Access to the drug in the United States has been limited by logistical bottlenecks that are being addressed, Soriot said, adding Britain was one of the few developed countries that has not ordered Evusheld.

“It’s a sad situation, quite frankly, because people who are immunocompromised are really suffering from the COVID crisis.”

Cancer

AstraZeneca—which unveiled plans to open an R&D centre in Cambridge, Massachusetts designed to serve as the new headquarters for rare disease unit Alexion, which it bought last summer—relies on cancer drugs for about a third of its total product sales.

Even though COVID-19 levels are beginning to wane, access to cancer diagnoses and treatment has still not rebounded to pre-pandemic levels. Things should normalize over the next few months, Soriot predicted.

Meanwhile, the company pared back its expectations for China, which accounted for about 16 percent of total revenue last year.

The Anglo-Swedish drugmaker said it expected sales there to decline by a mid-single-digit percentage in 2022, largely due to the impact of a program designed to bring down the prices of off-patent drugs in the country.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Increase in Reactivated Viruses Following COVID-19 Booster Shots: Dr. Richard Urso
The reactivation of latent viruses may be the cause of long COVID and other disorders
By Meiling Lee and Jan Jekielek
April 29, 2022 Updated: April 30, 2022

Some viruses, after initial infection, remain latent in the body for a lifetime and may reactivate to cause infection again or a different condition. These kinds of latent viruses are being reactivated in a large number of people following their booster COVID-19 shots, causing symptoms of long COVID and other health conditions, according to Dr. Richard Urso.

Long COVID is a condition where people experience ongoing, recurring, or new health problems weeks to months after first being infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, or receiving a COVID-19 injection. Symptoms may include brain fog, fatigue, chest pain, and insomnia, among others.

“So in my clinic right now, I am seeing three to five people a week because they know that I am taking a lot of time in my practice to do COVID, and they’re coming to see me with long COVID and … with problems after the vaccine,” Urso, an ophthalmologist, a drug design and treatment specialist, and co-founder of the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists, told EpochTV’s “American Thought Leaders” program. “And what I’m finding is a huge number of them have reactivated Epstein-Barr, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, CMV.”

Of the more than 100 species of herpesviruses, eight are known to infect humans and remain in the body for life after the primary infection has cleared, and which can reactivate later under certain conditions:

  • Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a common virus that causes infectious mononucleosis and is associated with several types of cancer and multiple sclerosis. It is estimated that more than 90 percent of healthy adults have been infected at some point in their lives.
  • Varicella-zoster virus is another common virus that primarily causes chickenpox and when reactivated, causes shingles in adults.
  • Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 cause oral and/or genital herpes, and it is estimated that 67 percent (3.7 billion) people worldwide under the age of 50 are infected with herpes simplex virus 1, whereas 13 percent (491 million) globally have herpes simplex 2.
  • Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common virus that infects people of all ages causing symptoms of fever, sore throat, swollen glands, and fatigue. It can also occasionally cause mononucleosis or hepatitis.
  • Human herpesvirus-6 and Human herpesvirus-7 cause roseola, a mild infection that mainly occurs in children between the ages of 6 months to 2 years.
  • Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infects the endothelial cells (that line lymphatic and blood vessels) which can become cancerous, a disease known as Kaposi’s sarcoma.
Epoch Times Photo
A screenshot of the list of the herpesviruses that infect humans and the disease they cause. (viprbrc.org)

Most people are unaware that they’ve been infected with some of these viruses as they experience no symptoms.

“A lot of people are looking at this long COVID as if it’s all viral related problems, specifically to the spike protein or to other issues. They don’t know that we’re seeing this huge reactivation in the herpesvirus family and we have treatment for it. It’s been working really really well,” Urso said.

While there is still no standard clinical definition or treatment for Long COVID, Urso says that there are many different repurposed drugs doctors can prescribe off-label to treat the syndrome, such as those used in the I-RECOVER protocol, developed by The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.

For long COVID symptoms caused by one of the reactivated herpesviruses, Urso says he prescribes Valtrex and supplements like lysine and vitamin D.

“We use lysine because it’s one of those nutritionals that’s good against the herpesvirus family. The ratio of lysine-arginine seems to impact the ability of these viruses to replicate,” Urso said.

He added, “I tell people vitamin D is your data analyst. It allows the immune system to make good decisions … And when vitamin D is around, your immune system can recognize, ‘Oh, this is pollen, let’s leave it alone. Let’s attack this pathogen, let’s attack this cancer.’”

Urso said he’s been recommending vitamin D since 1995 when he was the chief of orbital oncology at MD Anderson Cancer Center. He came upon a study that showed the supplement “had some impact on a tumor recognition protein” and began to test all of his patients’ vitamin D levels.

“Virtually 100 percent of the patients were vitamin D deficient with cancer, colon cancer particularly, we became aware of it,” Urso said, adding that vitamin D has also been “amazing for allergies, it’s amazing for prevention, and resistance against cancer, particularly lymphomas and breast cancer.”

Treating COVID Patients

When the pandemic began, Urso said that he couldn’t stay quiet knowing that COVID-19 can be treated early with various repurposed drugs and “reluctantly started treating” patients as a result of other doctors refusing to prescribe early treatment.

“I told my patients if you have COVID, nobody is going to help you. I said, first go through the chain, [and] if no one’s going to help you, I’ll help you,” Urso said.

More than two years into the pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to tell people to stay home unless they show “emergency warning signs” that include difficulty breathing, new confusion, and persistent chest pain or pressure.

The health agency only began recommending in January 2022 that individuals at high risk of developing severe disease should seek early treatment with one of the emergency authorized medications when they test positive for COVID-19.

Throughout the pandemic, the CDC has not recommended people to take vitamin D. Studies have shown that vitamin D can help prevent COVID-19, reduce admission to the intensive care unit, and significantly reduce mortality. A study from Israel found that people who were vitamin D deficient were 14 times more likely to have severe COVID-19.

Lipid Nanoparticles

Lipid nanoparticles (LPNs) are tiny particles made up of lipids or fat that act as a delivery system by encapsulating the mRNA that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein into the human cells.

Without the LPNs, the mRNA would degrade in a matter of seconds once injected into the arm.

Studies have found that the LPNs are not degrading and being eliminated from the body in the 36-hour time frame the FDA recently told The Epoch Times about, nor do they stay only at the injection site.

The Japanese regulatory agency’s biodistribution study (pdf) of the Pfizer vaccine showed that some of the mRNA moved from the injection site and through the bloodstream, and was found in various organs such as the liver, spleen, adrenal glands, and ovaries of rats 48 hours following injection.

“This is something that I would have known quite readily because I work with lipid nanoparticles,” Urso said. “I could have told you that lipid nanoparticles, I usually say, they need a door crack [to leave the injection site], whereas a virus needs an open door.”

Since a normal vaccine requires an “open door” to distribute to other parts of the body, Urso says, “a normal vaccine stays in the arm, pretty much 99.9 percent or 99 percent,” while “a large majority” of LPNs will not stay in the arm.

“In fact, we now know that a large part of it goes into the lymph node right underneath here, and is still making spike protein 60 days later,” Urso said, adding that the spike protein “is actually being found up to 15 months later, in monocytes and other cells, it’s not being degraded.”

Urso says that the persistence of spike protein in different parts of the body is interfering with the immune system’s normal functions and causing health problems.

“It’s blocking important tumor repairing genes called p53, it’s blocking BRCA [genes], it’s also messing with microRNA-27A, which is causing upticks in colon cancer cells,” Urso said.

Urso says that the presence of spikes and LPNs is also “messing with Toll-like receptors 7 and 8,” which are “important for immune surveillance for viruses.”

“So we’re going to see this huge uptick in all the viruses that lay kind of dormant in our body like herpesvirus family.”
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Study Links Increase in Emergency Heart Events With COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout
By Jack Phillips
April 29, 2022

A new study found a correlation between an increase in emergency cardiovascular events among people under 40 years of age during the launch of Israel’s COVID-19 vaccine program.

Published in the Nature journal, researchers utilized data from the Israel National Emergency Medical Services between 2019 and 2021 that evaluated emergency, or EMS, calls among 16- to 39-year-olds across Israel “with potential factors including COVID-19 infection and vaccination rates.”

They found that there was a 25 percent increase in EMS calls between January 2021 to May 2021, as compared with the years 2019 and 2020. Israel, which primarily uses Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, launched its COVID-19 vaccine program in late December 2020.

“The weekly emergency call counts were significantly associated with the rates of 1st and 2nd vaccine doses administered to this age group but were not with COVID-19 infection rates,” they found. “While not establishing causal relationships, the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals.”

They recommend that when evaluating possible vaccine side-effects and COVID-19 outcomes, officials should incorporate EMS data and relevant data to identify potential new health trends such as an increase in EMS calls, and “promptly investigate potential underlying causes.”

A recent study carried out by Swedish researchers across populations in Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway suggested that heart inflammation requiring hospital care was more common among people who received COVID-19 vaccines than individuals who did not.

“These extra cases among men aged 16 to 24 correspond to a 5 times increased risk after Comirnaty and 15 times increased risk after Spikevax compared to unvaccinated,” Dr. Rickard Ljung, a professor and physician at the Swedish Medical Products Agency who was involved in the study, told The Epoch Times last week. Spikevax is the name for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine, while Comirnaty is Pfizer’s vaccine.

His team found that myocarditis or pericarditis rates are higher than the levels in an unvaccinated cohort, or 38 per 100,000 after second doses of the mRNA vaccines were administered.

The Israeli research team said in their study, published on April 28, that they believe the “benefits of COVID-19 vaccination are clear, especially for populations at great risk of developing serious and potentially life-threatening illness” such as older adults or immunocompromised individuals. However, they noted, “it is important to better understand the potential risks to minimize potential harm.”

When conducting the research, the Israeli scientists made note of several potential flaws, including a “self-reporting bias” when individuals report symptoms via report systems including the U.S. federal government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), including “under and over-reporting” of vaccine-related symptoms.

“Even the study from Israel that is based on more proactive data collection mentions that some of the potentially relevant cases were not fully investigated,” they said.

A second issue the researchers ran into is how the symptoms of myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation, present themselves.

“Myocarditis is a particularly insidious disease with multiple reported manifestations,” they noted. “There is vast literature that highlights asymptomatic cases of myocarditis, which are often underdiagnosed.”

Meanwhile, “myocardial injury and myocarditis [are] prevalent among patients with COVID-19 infection,” not just among those who received the vaccine, it said.

“As COVID-19 vaccine rollouts often take place with background community COVID-19 infections, it could be challenging to identify whether increased incidence of myocarditis and related cardiovascular conditions … is driven by COVID-19 infections or induced by COVID-19 vaccines,” it added.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and most health agencies worldwide have said that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the potential risks. The CDC on its website says that most patients who develop myocarditis or pericarditis and got medical care have responded well to treatment.

Symptoms include chest pain, shortness of breath, and feelings of a fast-beating or fluttering heart.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Technique Shows Promise for Treating Heart Disease
By European Society of Cardiology
April 30, 2022

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles to deliver mRNA to the body’s cells. A similar method for delivering genetic material to the body is being tested as a way to heal damaged heart muscle after a heart attack.

A technique for delivering genetic material to the body is being investigated as a means of repairing damaged heart muscle after a heart attack. The groundbreaking research study will be presented today (April 30, 2022) at Frontiers in CardioVascular Biomedicine 2022, a scientific congress of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).[1]

The COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines[2] use lipid nanoparticles (tiny fat droplets) to deliver mRNA to the body’s cells. This mRNA tells cells to produce a dummy spike protein on their surface in order to imitate the protein on the virus that causes COVID-19. After that, the body creates an immune response by producing antibodies that may be employed if the individual becomes infected with the virus.

The current research study employed a similar strategy for mRNA delivery. However, rather than eliciting an immune response, the researchers’ ultimate goal is to instruct the heart’s cells to repair themselves after a heart attack.

This preliminary study was conducted to determine whether mRNA could be successfully delivered to the heart muscle in lipid nanoparticles. The researchers injected different formulations into the left ventricular wall of mouse hearts during open chest surgery under general anesthesia. Twenty-four hours after administration, the mice were sacrificed and the location of mRNA translation was examined.

The researchers found that mRNA successfully reached the heart cells 24 hours after injection. However, despite injection into the heart, the highest levels of mRNA translation were found in cells of the liver and spleen.

Study author Dr. Clara Labonia of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands said: “High expression was expected in the liver, since it metabolizes the lipid nanoparticles. Nonetheless, it was encouraging to see that there was mRNA translation in the heart tissue which means that lipid nanoparticles could work as delivery systems for mRNA therapy.”

She concluded: “The next step of this research is to test more formulations and choose the one which most efficiently targets the heart tissue. We will then assess whether delivery of mRNA to mice with ischaemic hearts (resembling a heart attack) has any therapeutic effect.”

References and notes
  1. The abstract “Modified mRNA delivery to the heart using lipid nanoparticles” will be presented during the session “Young Investigator Award – Novelties in cardiovascular disease mechanism” which takes place on 30 April at 11:30 CEST in Lecture Room 3.
  2. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines include Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
Funding: Funding was provided by the Dutch Heart Foundation (Dr. E. Dekker Senior Scientist grant, no. 2019T049).
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Virus might be behind mystery child hepatitis cases: US agency
April 30, 2022

CDC recommends children stay up to date on their vaccinations and that parents and caregivers practice preventive actions such as hand hygiene, avoiding people who are sick, covering coughs and sneezes, and avoiding touch the eyes, nose or mouth.

Nine young children from Alabama affected by a mysterious hepatitis (inflammation of the liver) all tested positive for a common pathogen called adenovirus 41, a study by the US health agency said Friday.

The children, who ranged in age from about one to six years old and were all previously healthy, are among around 170 cases across 11 countries in recent weeks, according to the World Health Organization. Another state, Wisconsin, is investigating a death.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's new paper is specifically about the cluster in Alabama, even as investigations continue nationwide.

"At this time, we believe adenovirus may be the cause for these reported cases, but other potential environmental and situational factors are still being investigated," the CDC said in a statement that accompanied the study.

Adenovirus 41 is known to cause gastroenteritis in children, but "it is not usually known as a cause of hepatitis in otherwise healthy children," the agency said.

However, an investigation had ruled out other common exposures, including COVID; hepatitis viruses A, B, and C (the most common causes of hepatitis in the US); autoimmune hepatitis and Wilson disease.

The nine Alabama cases occurred between October 2021 and February 2022. Three experienced acute liver failure, two of whom required liver transplants.

"All patients have recovered or are recovering, including the two transplant recipients," the paper said.

Six tested positive for Epstein-Barr Virus but did not have antibodies, which implies an earlier infection, not active.

Before hospitalization, most of the children experienced vomiting and diarrhea, while some experienced upper respiratory symptoms. During hospitalization, most had yellowing eyes and yellowing skin (jaundice), and enlarged livers.

Last week, the CDC issued a health alert to notify doctors and public health authorities to be on the lookout for similar cases.

Wisconsin is investigating four cases, including two children who had severe outcomes, one who needed a liver transplant and one fatality. Cases have also been reported in Illinois and elsewhere.

CDC recommends children stay up to date on their vaccinations and that parents and caregivers practice preventive actions such as hand hygiene, avoiding people who are sick, covering coughs and sneezes, and avoiding touching the eyes, nose or mouth.

Adenoviruses are commonly spread by close personal contact, respiratory droplets and surfaces. There are more than 50 types of adenoviruses, which most commonly cause the cold, but also many other diseases.
 
Top