DEEP STATE WEF Says Fashion Will Be Abolished by 2030: “Humans Will All Wear a Uniform”

raven

TB Fanatic
The WHO will declare a "Fashion Pandemic" and mandate everyone wear pajamas . . . men blue . . . women pink . . .
and most people will think it is reasonable and demand that men who think they are women also wear pink.
1688919603277.png

(admit it . . . those look really comfortable and you really want to get a few)
 

blueinterceptor

Veteran Member
None of their plans have worked out?

Gay Marriage
Baking a cake for a gay marriage.
Transgender begin appointed to very important government positions.
They are teaching gender transition in elementary school.
Affirmative Action
Abortion on Demand

Their plans are working out all the time.
Because over time people get worn down and just accept them as normal

You did.
When they can’t wear you down. They beat you into submission.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Well then, you're what we call a 'clothes horse' around here!
Horselaugh.

I remember well Owner's daughter and the encyclopedia showing the "Statue of David" in all its glorious detail. Owner's daughter was singularly unimpressed.

"I see that EVERY DAY - and much larger than any "David", Dick or Harry.

"Where do you see that?" And a parade of giggly teen girls going by my stall.

And the inevitable end query from Owner's Daughter "Do you know what smegma is?"

Dobbin
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city

The World Economic Forum has declared that by 2030 fashion will become completely obsolete and all humans will be vegan, whether they like it or not.


A newly resurfaced report written in 2019 states that humans will only be permitted to buy three items of clothing per year and will be prohibited from buying or consuming meat.

Published in 2019, ‘The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World’ report funded by the WEF, sets out extreme targets for governments around the globe to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as consistent with the 2015 Paris Agreement ambitions.

The report outlines six areas where world governments can take “rapid action to address consumption-based emissions”: food, construction, clothing, vehicles, aviation, and electronics:
Late to this, but:

# 1: What do they plan to do about the multi-million (billion?) garment industry?

# 2: What do they intend to do about the (then JOB-less) millions of garment workers (mostly in already-impoverished countries in Asia / India)?

# 3: Are the specs for their "uniform" out? Will it look something like this:


Chinese Woman in Zhongsong suit 1972.png
 

raven

TB Fanatic
Late to this, but:

# 1: What do they plan to do about the multi-million (billion?) garment industry?

# 2: What do they intend to do about the (then JOB-less) millions of garment workers (mostly in already-impoverished countries in Asia / India)?

# 3: Are the specs for their "uniform" out? Will it look something like this:


View attachment 423607
The garment workers will still be employed . . . making the new suit . . . it will be called the Schwab Suit.
And there will be new jobs for tailors to make the alterations for your third world country manufactured Schwab Suit to fit to your first world belly and ass.
And of course, there will be hats. Lots of hats to distinguish the upper crust from the moldy.

And of course there will be a variety of accoutrements for the transgenders.
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
There can be a lot of variation in the same uniform.


OIP.9r6Z4ZJWnYGzUDq-hhFwcAHaLL
OIP.1Ha2-LQunsSowM9wsja1NgAAAA
 

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I hate clothes shopping now, because almost everything is made in China, and I won't buy it. Really limiting. When I was shopping for some non-clothes items I was appalled that almost everything is made in China. Everything. The implications of that continues to send a cold shiver down my spine. So many ways that things can go wrong.
 

lostinaz

Senior Member
Why are there so many posts that start off with "WEF says"

It does not matter what they say, they are not an intelligent guru, they are not wise advisors. they are a subversive lot of people with too much money with communistic views and they are hell bent on not only shaping world culture and society but profiting from it.

They are meaningless.

I guess the only reason it might make sense is to know what your ENEMY is thinking.
The reason is world leaders use them as marching orders. For example "Build Back Better" after COVID. Suddenly all the lib world leaders were using that phrase, which was previously only used by WEF folks.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Clickbait fake news headline.

I just spent the morning reading the whole linked and referenced 68 page article. The above statements are not anywhere to be found.

This is a typical embellished, clickbait, ad-revenue generating article. Take a real article, report, study and claim it says something outrageous that it doesn’t actually say to draw traffic to a related website full of ads.

Carry on.

Thanks, I for one can't see this happening anytime soon, the borg look that is, the fashion industry in both North America and europe is a multi billion dollar industry, if not more. I can't see them letting go of that cash cow anytime soon.
 

Charmer153

Contributing Member
None of their plans have worked out?

Gay Marriage
Baking a cake for a gay marriage.
Transgender begin appointed to very important government positions.
They are teaching gender transition in elementary school.
Affirmative Action
Abortion on Demand

Their plans are working out all the time.
Because over time people get worn down and just accept them as normal

You did.
The WEF is not the ones pushing those. maybe the abortion on demand, but that one recently took a hit. Those are being pushed by lgbq+ group.
The WEF are the ones that wanted to reduce the human population. I know of 3 ways they tried to do this. all 3 failed.
1) They wanted to force all people to live in 10 walled cities spread around the world, each would hold 100,000 people. This would limit the total human population to 1,000,000. The world outside the walls would belong to the animals. This idea still comes up sometimes, but it no longer has any support.
2) They wanted to put birth control in the cities water supply to prevent babies, and reduce the population. That failed. very few water companies agreed to put the drugs in, and those few limited how much.
3) They wanted to sterilize the males in the 3rd world countries. They tried to claim this was humanitarian, to prevent more babies being born into starvation and filth. This one failed because they could not find a way to do it secretly.
Those are the 3 plans I have heard of, there are probably 10,000 more plans that are still working on.
 

Shadow

Swift, Silent,...Sleepy
I wonder if they intend to consider those who are genetically modified by the RNA shot to be human?

Shadow
 

raven

TB Fanatic
The WEF is not the ones pushing those. maybe the abortion on demand, but that one recently took a hit. Those are being pushed by lgbq+ group.
The WEF are the ones that wanted to reduce the human population. I know of 3 ways they tried to do this. all 3 failed.
1) They wanted to force all people to live in 10 walled cities spread around the world, each would hold 100,000 people. This would limit the total human population to 1,000,000. The world outside the walls would belong to the animals. This idea still comes up sometimes, but it no longer has any support.
2) They wanted to put birth control in the cities water supply to prevent babies, and reduce the population. That failed. very few water companies agreed to put the drugs in, and those few limited how much.
3) They wanted to sterilize the males in the 3rd world countries. They tried to claim this was humanitarian, to prevent more babies being born into starvation and filth. This one failed because they could not find a way to do it secretly.
Those are the 3 plans I have heard of, there are probably 10,000 more plans that are still working on.
I'm not worried about it.
I'm wearing a pair of 25 year old camo BDUs. I've got enough clothes to last until I die.
I plan on selling my clothing allotment for a new EV.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Hillary being Hillary aside. Most women, especially in the professions, come up with a uniform. They may have a dozen variations like Hillary, but it is still pretty much the same. For about 120 years now, men have had the fallback of the basic suit, which has enough variations for every body type. Once a man finds his style, he tends to stick with it, sometimes (as with the ladies) a few years beyond when that look is best for them.

The difference is that we choose that uniform. No one is telling anyone (beyond a basic office dress code) exactly what to wear). Over time, things have changed. When I started working, you never saw man buns or even long braids on professional men except a few who played with the local orchestra or something. Now both are acceptable nearly everywhere.

But an old man or a young dandy can still pick a style of suit from around 1910 with a brocaded waistcoat/vest and be called "stylish." Sooner or later there will be a big change (I think I'm seeing it with Kilts going mainstream for me), but generally, fashion is impossible to wipe out. It can be modified, but it is always there.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The WHO will declare a "Fashion Pandemic" and mandate everyone wear pajamas . . . men blue . . . women pink . . .
and most people will think it is reasonable and demand that men who think they are women also wear pink.
View attachment 423603

(admit it . . . those look really comfortable and you really want to get a few)
Got to tell ya:

My son's wife's mother (his MIL) had a Christmas party where everyone had to wear onesies to the party.

I told her, good thing she didn't invite me, I would have hurt her feelings......bad. She gave me bad eyes. I didn't get over 8 hours of sleep that night I tell ya.
 

Sacajawea

Has No Life - Lives on TB
In order to make this a reality, there would have to fashion police. (Which has already been a matter of speculation, n'est-ce pas?)

But the fact is, humans are always going to human... and can NOT be coerced into conformity, unless they choose it.
 

LoupGarou

Ancient Fuzzball
Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city - or should I say, "our city". I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes.

It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
Ida Auken wrote this ON the WEF site, and they had it up for quite some time talking about it there and elsewhere...

The above is from:

11 Nov 2016

  1. Ida Auken Member of Parliament, Parliament of Denmark (Folketinget)
    For more information watch the What If: Privacy Becomes a Luxury Good? session from the World Economic Forum's Annual Meeting 2017.

    Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city - or should I say, "our city". I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes.

    It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.

    First communication became digitized and free to everyone. Then, when clean energy became free, things started to move quickly. Transportation dropped dramatically in price. It made no sense for us to own cars anymore, because we could call a driverless vehicle or a flying car for longer journeys within minutes. We started transporting ourselves in a much more organized and coordinated way when public transport became easier, quicker and more convenient than the car. Now I can hardly believe that we accepted congestion and traffic jams, not to mention the air pollution from combustion engines. What were we thinking?
    Sometimes I use my bike when I go to see some of my friends. I enjoy the exercise and the ride. It kind of gets the soul to come along on the journey. Funny how some things seem never seem to lose their excitement: walking, biking, cooking, drawing and growing plants. It makes perfect sense and reminds us of how our culture emerged out of a close relationship with nature.

    "Environmental problems seem far away"​

    In our city we don't pay any rent, because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it. My living room is used for business meetings when I am not there.

    Once in awhile, I will choose to cook for myself. It is easy - the necessary kitchen equipment is delivered at my door within minutes. Since transport became free, we stopped having all those things stuffed into our home. Why keep a pasta-maker and a crepe cooker crammed into our cupboards? We can just order them when we need them.
    This also made the breakthrough of the circular economy easier. When products are turned into services, no one has an interest in things with a short life span. Everything is designed for durability, repairability and recyclability. The materials are flowing more quickly in our economy and can be transformed to new products pretty easily. Environmental problems seem far away, since we only use clean energy and clean production methods. The air is clean, the water is clean and nobody would dare to touch the protected areas of nature because they constitute such value to our well being. In the cities we have plenty of green space and plants and trees all over. I still do not understand why in the past we filled all free spots in the city with concrete.

    The death of shopping​

    Shopping? I can't really remember what that is. For most of us, it has been turned into choosing things to use. Sometimes I find this fun, and sometimes I just want the algorithm to do it for me. It knows my taste better than I do by now.

    When AI and robots took over so much of our work, we suddenly had time to eat well, sleep well and spend time with other people. The concept of rush hour makes no sense anymore, since the work that we do can be done at any time. I don't really know if I would call it work anymore. It is more like thinking-time, creation-time and development-time.

    For a while, everything was turned into entertainment and people did not want to bother themselves with difficult issues. It was only at the last minute that we found out how to use all these new technologies for better purposes than just killing time.

    "They live different kinds of lives outside of the city"​

    My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages.

    Once in awhile I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. No where I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me.

    All in all, it is a good life. Much better than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth. We had all these terrible things happening: lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment. We lost way too many people before we realised that we could do things differently.

    Author's note: Some people have read this blog as my utopia or dream of the future. It is not. It is a scenario showing where we could be heading - for better and for worse. I wrote this piece to start a discussion about some of the pros and cons of the current technological development. When we are dealing with the future, it is not enough to work with reports. We should start discussions in many new ways. This is the intention with this piece.

They have already said that you will rent or lease (basically a long term "rent"), EVERYTHING in the near future if they get what they want. This means clothes and everything else. Laptop? Yup. Your data space in the cloud? Yep. Your room and board? Definitely? Transportation? That too. And if you stop paying rent, you don't "rent". Or if they cut your accounts off, you go without. How many people (rebels) are willing to be forced to walk around naked and homeless if THEY get their way?

Ultimate Control...

Panopticon Plantation. THIS is where all of this is heading.

Once they get to the level of control that they are talking about, what limits THEM to force anyone to do anything that THEY demand?

Planetary workforce on demand 24/7/365.25. Or, planetary wide army to also do their will.

One could wonder (or read a Book) about what that army's target could be. At the start, I am betting that it will be anyone that does not go along with THEIR plan. We saw that in the late 1800s and then again in the 1930s and 1940s...
 
Top