How the population look in their snazzy uniforms.So these WEF bastards want a return to the chinese cultural mao look. This is how everybody dressed back then:
View attachment 423461
View attachment 423462
View attachment 423463
View attachment 423464
How the population look in their snazzy uniforms.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErwS24cBZPc
(one minute)
Rice with beetles was a great way to add protein to the diet of Viet Cong fighters. Coming soon to a hooch near you.Rice? I thought the WEF was pushing BUGS as food?
You are definitely on to something.thanks for the truth of it Kris . . . is it safe to assume this is what we have to look forward to with the rise of AI where the lies will not only be ubiquitous but so perfectly crafted that they will be indistinguishable from TRUTH?
Ignore them at your peril.To take them seriously would be an affront to our intelligence.
By 2030, a more likely bet, is the WEF will not exist
The World Economic Forum has declared that by 2030 fashion will become completely obsolete and all humans will be vegan, whether they like it or not.
A newly resurfaced report written in 2019 states that humans will only be permitted to buy three items of clothing per year and will be prohibited from buying or consuming meat.
Published in 2019, ‘The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World’ report funded by the WEF, sets out extreme targets for governments around the globe to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as consistent with the 2015 Paris Agreement ambitions.
The report outlines six areas where world governments can take “rapid action to address consumption-based emissions”: food, construction, clothing, vehicles, aviation, and electronics:
Bluebird flour is sold in cloth bags, but they are white, not patterned anymoreFlour does not come in fabric sacks anymore, its all plastic.
While it may be click bate, I didn't really look farther than the article, There would have to be some serious changes in the next 6+ years to accomplish something like this. These people do not understand the mind of Americans and how we cow boy/girl the f up.Clickbait fake news headline.
I just spent the morning reading the whole linked and referenced 68 page article. The above statements are not anywhere to be found.
This is a typical embellished, clickbait, ad-revenue generating article. Take a real article, report, study and claim it says something outrageous that it doesn’t actually say to draw traffic to a related website full of ads.
Carry on.
Here is the original study from ARUP.While it may be click bate, I didn't really look farther than the article, There would have to be some serious changes in the next 6+ years to accomplish something like this. These people do not understand the mind of Americans and how we cow boy/girl the f up.
The origin of the article is
The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C WorldThe Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5C World - Arup
New ways of measuring cities’ climate footprints show that C40 cities consumption-based emissions contribute to 10% of global greenhouse gases. This report explores how cities consumption-based emissions need to reduce to avoid a climate breakdown and focuses on six sectors – food, construction...www.arup.com
It is a download link.
You can get the PDF report from
Its a PDF. It is long.
However on page 82, there is an interesting chart. And, lo, there it is "3 new clothing items per person per year. Go figure.
View attachment 423526
As was mentioned, it is important for YOU to search the references of any aritcle personally.
That would be two items more than I buy in a typical year....humans will only be permitted to buy three items of clothing per year...
Fetterman would be the only one who could comply, with a hoodie, shorts and sneakers.
Psst, everyone... Barry has gone over to the dark side.That would be two items more than I buy in a typical year.
seriously.
I have all the clothes I need, unless I were to drastically gain or lose weight.
Even clickbait makes for an interesting thread. For example, we've found out maybe more than we wanted about certain members . . . .
At least I no longer have to buy dresses and pantyhose for work.
That's for sure! It was $80 for a decent dress, and I was ready to break out the sewing machine. However, I switched to buying modest skirts and blouses at Sears before their clothes became crappy club wear and then our "dress code" (such as it was) at work became "business casual," which meant dress trousers for women were fine. I think we all ditched the pantyhose immediately. I've never looked back!That's like getting a raise!
I admit my fashion statements can be summed up in one word: Carhartt.
The World Economic Forum has declared that by 2030 fashion will become completely obsolete and all humans will be vegan, whether they like it or not.
In September 2024, the UN Summit of the Future is scheduled to take place. That's real enough, and it lays the groundwork for stuff like this.Clickbait fake news headline.
I just spent the morning reading the whole linked and referenced 68 page article. The above statements are not anywhere to be found.
This is a typical embellished, clickbait, ad-revenue generating article. Take a real article, report, study and claim it says something outrageous that it doesn’t actually say to draw traffic to a related website full of ads.
Carry on.
Thank you, Raven.The origin of the article is
The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C WorldThe Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5C World - Arup
New ways of measuring cities’ climate footprints show that C40 cities consumption-based emissions contribute to 10% of global greenhouse gases. This report explores how cities consumption-based emissions need to reduce to avoid a climate breakdown and focuses on six sectors – food, construction...www.arup.com
It is a download link.
You can get the PDF report from
Its a PDF. It is long.
However on page 82, there is an interesting chart. And, lo, there it is "3 new clothing items per person per year. Go figure.
View attachment 423526
As was mentioned, it is important for YOU to search the references of any aritcle personally.
This is prefect for formal wear, though many prefer the great kilt for field operations as it can double as a blanket. Put all those yards of fabric to duel uses!Here’s my clothing choice.
Still a lot of my people around. And they aren’t real fond if compliance.
Being Truthful and real for a moment:So besides a pair of bib overalls are you buying two pairs of underwear or going commando and wearing a pair of socks?
Nehru Jacket?google "Mao Suit"
Popularity
The jacket began to be marketed as the Nehru jacket in Europe and America in the mid 1960s. It was briefly popular there in the late 1960s and early 1970s, its popularity spurred by the aspirational class' growing awareness of foreign cultures, by the minimalism of the Mod lifestyle and, in particular, by Sammy Davis Jr.[3] and the Beatles.[4][5] Some were also worn by Roger Delgado's version of the renegade Time Lord known as the Master on the science fiction Doctor Who.
Charles Barron, Mahathir Mohamad are among the politicians who frequently wear Nehru suits.[6][7]
In 2012, Nehru jacket was listed among the Top 10 Political Fashion Statements by Jared T. Miller in the Time magazine.[8]
If you look up Mao Suit, it points to the Zhongshan suit which was counter-culture to traditional Chinese fashion.There is too much money in the fashion industry for it to be disbanded.
None of their plans have worked out?Somehow I doubt this is going to happen. None of thier other plans have worked the way they wanted, so why should they expect this one to work?