DEEP STATE WEF Says Fashion Will Be Abolished by 2030: “Humans Will All Wear a Uniform”

Kris Gandillon

The Other Curmudgeon
_______________
thanks for the truth of it Kris . . . is it safe to assume this is what we have to look forward to with the rise of AI where the lies will not only be ubiquitous but so perfectly crafted that they will be indistinguishable from TRUTH?
You are definitely on to something.

The truth can always be known and found but you may have to dig for it, something many will not be bothered to do.

It all goes back to the literal beginning. Literally, Genesis 3:1. The first fake news from the original liar and faker himself, Satan.

“Did God really say…”.

Which, if you dig a bit, you will see that Satan was twisting and embellishing what God REALLY said and turning it into a seemingly reasonable and believable lie that Eve wanted to believe.

And humanity continues to fall for fake news and believable lies because most will not dig for the truth and discern “is that really what was said?” because they WANT to believe the lie, because, like Eve, the lie appeals to their pre-conceived notions and biases.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic

The World Economic Forum has declared that by 2030 fashion will become completely obsolete and all humans will be vegan, whether they like it or not.


A newly resurfaced report written in 2019 states that humans will only be permitted to buy three items of clothing per year and will be prohibited from buying or consuming meat.

Published in 2019, ‘The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World’ report funded by the WEF, sets out extreme targets for governments around the globe to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as consistent with the 2015 Paris Agreement ambitions.

The report outlines six areas where world governments can take “rapid action to address consumption-based emissions”: food, construction, clothing, vehicles, aviation, and electronics:
By 2030, a more likely bet, is the WEF will not exist
 

energy_wave

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The new WEF approved clothing line.

For the men...


leaving-las-vegas.webp


For the women...

Marilyn-and-the-Potato-Sack-Dress-c-1.jpg


For those who aren't sure...

5fl-uroou.jpg
 

nomifyle

TB Fanatic
Clickbait fake news headline.

I just spent the morning reading the whole linked and referenced 68 page article. The above statements are not anywhere to be found.

This is a typical embellished, clickbait, ad-revenue generating article. Take a real article, report, study and claim it says something outrageous that it doesn’t actually say to draw traffic to a related website full of ads.

Carry on.
While it may be click bate, I didn't really look farther than the article, There would have to be some serious changes in the next 6+ years to accomplish something like this. These people do not understand the mind of Americans and how we cow boy/girl the f up.
 

raven

TB Fanatic
While it may be click bate, I didn't really look farther than the article, There would have to be some serious changes in the next 6+ years to accomplish something like this. These people do not understand the mind of Americans and how we cow boy/girl the f up.
Here is the original study from ARUP.
This report by C40, Arup and the University of Leeds assesses the impact of urban consumption on climate breakdown and explores the type and scale of changes needed to ensure that C40 cities reduce their GHG emissions in line with internationally agreed, climate-safe limits.

You can download the PDF and gain a full understanding.

The origin of the article is
The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World

It is a download link.

You can get the PDF report from

Its a PDF. It is long.
However on page 82, there is an interesting chart. And, lo, there it is "3 new clothing items per person per year. Go figure.
View attachment 423526

As was mentioned, it is important for YOU to search the references of any aritcle personally.
 

Attachments

  • 1688860819170.png
    1688860819170.png
    28.8 KB · Views: 1

Barry Natchitoches

Has No Life - Lives on TB
...humans will only be permitted to buy three items of clothing per year...

Fetterman would be the only one who could comply, with a hoodie, shorts and sneakers.
That would be two items more than I buy in a typical year.

seriously.

I have all the clothes I need, unless I were to drastically gain or lose weight.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie / FJB!
On the three item thing . . . not going to happen!

I buy 5 - 6 inexpensive tops (blouses / polo shirts) for work and generally replace those about every other year, sometimes sooner if I'm working on a printer ink cartridge and the ink gets all over me. Ink may or may not come out of inexpensive fabric!

When I "retire," I may sew or spend more money on several nice blouses and better polo shirts for wearing in public and keep them for 5+ years. At home, it's cheap, plain tee shirts and jeans.

At least I no longer have to buy dresses and pantyhose for work.
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie / FJB!
That's like getting a raise!

:D
That's for sure! It was $80 for a decent dress, and I was ready to break out the sewing machine. However, I switched to buying modest skirts and blouses at Sears before their clothes became crappy club wear and then our "dress code" (such as it was) at work became "business casual," which meant dress trousers for women were fine. I think we all ditched the pantyhose immediately. I've never looked back!
 

TheSearcher

Are you sure about that?
Clickbait fake news headline.

I just spent the morning reading the whole linked and referenced 68 page article. The above statements are not anywhere to be found.

This is a typical embellished, clickbait, ad-revenue generating article. Take a real article, report, study and claim it says something outrageous that it doesn’t actually say to draw traffic to a related website full of ads.

Carry on.
In September 2024, the UN Summit of the Future is scheduled to take place. That's real enough, and it lays the groundwork for stuff like this.

I'm bringing this up here because it strikes me in a way I can't yet quite define that the Summit is the beginning point for a bunch of nonsense like this. We need to be ready.
 

TheSearcher

Are you sure about that?
The origin of the article is
The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World

It is a download link.

You can get the PDF report from

Its a PDF. It is long.
However on page 82, there is an interesting chart. And, lo, there it is "3 new clothing items per person per year. Go figure.
View attachment 423526

As was mentioned, it is important for YOU to search the references of any aritcle personally.
Thank you, Raven.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
So besides a pair of bib overalls are you buying two pairs of underwear or going commando and wearing a pair of socks?
Being Truthful and real for a moment:

Mostly I have the carpenter, and tactical pants, Henley shirts, and hats. And some pocket T's. Winter and Summer. Along with a bomber type Carhartt jacket. An Artic coverall, that is way to hot to work outside in even at 9-11 degrees but not to hot to sit in a deer stand, watch tree leaves move around. And because those Artic Coverall's are so hot (I'm very cold natured so go above and beyond on winter clothes) I did get a pair of bib overalls which are flannel lined, zipper on the side and all that, so I could wear a coat over them. But have gained some weight since I bought them and now need to leave the side buttons unbuttoned.

And now for the fun part: (and hence not true)

Onesies for the underwear, and no socks, just brogan shoes with bare feet and unlaced.

True again:

My grandfather wore that get up. Onesies with the flap on the back, all his life. Which was for work around the farm during the summer, if he didn't have his khakied long sleeve shirt on except his bib overalls were Oshkosh By' gosh. And with a Stetson straw hat in the summer, and felt in the winter.

Part of the reason for no socks in the summer, so barefoot in the brogans was, the dew was so heavy, and fields so dry, that the dust on his shoes would end up turning to mud. And he took them off when going inside. There was no such thing as "house shoes" and if there was, he couldn't afford it anyway.

Wore his best bib's to town with a white shirt. And black pants with a white shirt to church on Sunday. Since they drove a couple of mules to town pulling a wagon, wearing a tight woven bib shed dirt and dust better, as do the Carhartts.

Never will forget he kept his wallet in the bib part, and it snapped shut.

Do wear brogans for shoes though in the form of Merrell's. My doctor wears Keen's with wool socks in the office, and he's about to fling a craven on me. Already got some for SB. She was the Guiney Pig.

Kind of like when I pulled some Persimmons to check for the winter weather, and got home and told my son to try one of these. He plopped it in his mouth, and that was the end of that conversation. It does draw your mouth up. I'll have to remember not to eat one of those. Thanks.
 

raven

TB Fanatic
One only needs to ask oneself "Has this ever been done? and under what circumstances? and what does it represent?

google "Mao Suit"
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
google "Mao Suit"
Nehru Jacket?


Popularity​

The jacket began to be marketed as the Nehru jacket in Europe and America in the mid 1960s. It was briefly popular there in the late 1960s and early 1970s, its popularity spurred by the aspirational class' growing awareness of foreign cultures, by the minimalism of the Mod lifestyle and, in particular, by Sammy Davis Jr.[3] and the Beatles.[4][5] Some were also worn by Roger Delgado's version of the renegade Time Lord known as the Master on the science fiction Doctor Who.

Charles Barron, Mahathir Mohamad are among the politicians who frequently wear Nehru suits.[6][7]

In 2012, Nehru jacket was listed among the Top 10 Political Fashion Statements by Jared T. Miller in the Time magazine.[8]

Dobbin
 

raven

TB Fanatic
There is too much money in the fashion industry for it to be disbanded.
If you look up Mao Suit, it points to the Zhongshan suit which was counter-culture to traditional Chinese fashion.

It became the fashion industry - it was popular because it was counter to the culture. It was not a symbol of communism.
Here is both Chiang Kai-shek and Mao wearing the latest fashion.
1688914477030.png
 

Charmer153

Contributing Member
Somehow I doubt this is going to happen. None of thier other plans have worked the way they wanted, so why should they expect this one to work?
 

raven

TB Fanatic
Somehow I doubt this is going to happen. None of thier other plans have worked the way they wanted, so why should they expect this one to work?
None of their plans have worked out?

Gay Marriage
Baking a cake for a gay marriage.
Transgender begin appointed to very important government positions.
They are teaching gender transition in elementary school.
Affirmative Action
Abortion on Demand

Their plans are working out all the time.
Because over time people get worn down and just accept them as normal

You did.
 
Top