Celestial Vanishing act: Exploring the case of the disappearing moon

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.

Vanishing act: Exploring the case of the disappearing moon

Nearly 1,000 years ago, the moon vanished from the night sky without trace, and wasn’t seen for months on end. A team of researchers believes it knows why.

By Thomas Leffler, AccuWeather staff writer
Published Apr. 19, 2022 4:40 PM CDT | Updated Apr. 20, 2022 6:54 AM CDT
Copied


Nearly a millennium ago, the moon completely vanished from view, maybe even lasting years. After combing through medieval records, researchers now have a better idea of what may have happened.

The relationship between the Earth, moon and sun has been documented since the beginning of time. The welcoming golden light of the sun greets humanity and serves as the dawn of a new day, while the eerie white glow of the moon sends the human race into its nightly slumber.

But what if there was a day when one occurred without the other? What if that day became weeks or even months?

Such an occurrence took place nearly a millennium ago, as Earth's moon disappeared from view during the month of May in the year 1110, with nary a reason given for the strange phenomenon. The unusual occurrence puzzled those who lived through it and continued to baffle astronomers throughout the ages. There was a belief that the moon's disappearance was the result of an eclipse.

The British astronomer George Frederick Chambers wrote about the celestial mystery in his 1899 book The Story of Eclipses. About 800 years after it happened, Chambers pegged the date of the eclipse as having occurred on May 5, during the reign of Henry I.

"The totality occurred before midnight," Chambers wrote of the moon's disappearance from the night sky, adding that it was “evident that this was an instance of a ‘black’ eclipse when the moon becomes quite invisible instead of shining with the familiar coppery hue.”

But is that really what happened?

Finding out the root of the lunar absence became the work of a 2020 study in the journal Scientific Reports, leading to a more complex answer than originally thought.

The previously agreed-upon conclusion was that an eruption at Iceland's Mount Hekla was the culprit. Hekla, located in the southern end of Iceland, was referred to as the "Gateway to Hell" by Europeans during the Middle Ages due to its frequent eruptions.

When an eruption took place at Hekla on approximately Oct. 15, 1104, sulfur-rich particles launched into the stratosphere. For many years, this event was thought to be the catalyst for the moon's apparent disappearance.

Hekla-e1650380217740.jpg


An eruption of Icelandic volcano Hekla, above, was thought to be the root cause of a multi-year disappearance of the moon. (Photo/Getty Images)

The Scientific Reports study, led by a team from the University of Geneva in Switzerland, began to unravel new information into the moon's whereabouts. To see whether the Hekla eruption was the sole cause of the disappearance, the researchers analyzed ice cores from Iceland and Antarctica, and eventually determined that the date of the Hekla eruption did not line up with the 1110 timeline of lunar absence.

To find the true source, researchers combed through the records of medieval times for any references made to a "dark lunar eclipse" or a "black eclipse." After pouring over many a scripture, the team made a breakthrough with the following 1110 entry from The Peterborough Chronicle: "[The moon] was so completely extinguished withal, that neither light, nor orb, nor anything at all of it was seen."

AP091202018742.jpg


The full moon is seen behind clouds above the village Gaiberg near Heidelberg, Germany, on Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Daniel Roland)

Knowing the lunar absence began around 1110, the team suggests a cluster of volcanic eruptions from between 1108 and 1110 was most likely the root cause, not the 1104 Hekla eruption as previously thought.

One of these oft-forgotten eruptions took place in 1108 in Honshu, Japan. A diary entry from a Japanese statesman, uncovered by researchers and cited in the Scientific Reports study, said that an eruption of Honshu's Mount Asama began in late August of 1108 and continued through that October.

"On August 29, there was a fire at the top of the volcano, a thick layer of ash in the governor's garden, everywhere the fields and the rice fields are rendered unfit for cultivation," the entry read. "We never saw that in the country. It is a very strange and rare thing."

MountAsama.jpg


Japan's Mount Asama, photographed here from a commercial airplane, was home to one of the oft-forgotten volcanic eruptions that led to a long-term lunar absence. (Getty Images)

The 1108 eruption at Asama, known as perhaps the most significant in the volcano's history, is one of what the study called "several major volcanic events" that is consistent with the "stratospheric aerosol loading sufficient to induce" the dark eclipse. Observations of changes to the moon, such as the dark, total lunar eclipse, as well as observations of dimming or discoloration of the sun, are major corroborators of the timing of major explosive volcanic activity.

On top of the eclipse, the 1108-1110 eruptions led to several societal impacts in Europe, particularly in agriculture. The researchers' work revealed descriptions of an abundance of severe weather conditions, crop failures and famines compared to other years with similar volcanic events. Losing the lunar connection between Earth and the moon had several negative side effects, making the bright nightly appearance missed all the more.
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
So if the sky was so thick with ash that nobody could see the moon for months, then why didn’t anyone remark that they couldn’t see the sun either? “maybe lasting years...”

something doesn’t make sense here ...
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
So if the sky was so thick with ash that nobody could see the moon for months, then why didn’t anyone remark that they couldn’t see the sun either? “maybe lasting years...”

something doesn’t make sense here ...

there's definitely some information that's missing. The chinese were pretty good at keeping astronomical records, gotta wonder what they observed during this time frame.
 

ghost

Veteran Member

Vanishing act: Exploring the case of the disappearing moon

Nearly 1,000 years ago, the moon vanished from the night sky without trace, and wasn’t seen for months on end. A team of researchers believes it knows why.

By Thomas Leffler, AccuWeather staff writer
Published Apr. 19, 2022 4:40 PM CDT | Updated Apr. 20, 2022 6:54 AM CDT
Copied


Nearly a millennium ago, the moon completely vanished from view, maybe even lasting years. After combing through medieval records, researchers now have a better idea of what may have happened.

The relationship between the Earth, moon and sun has been documented since the beginning of time. The welcoming golden light of the sun greets humanity and serves as the dawn of a new day, while the eerie white glow of the moon sends the human race into its nightly slumber.

But what if there was a day when one occurred without the other? What if that day became weeks or even months?

Such an occurrence took place nearly a millennium ago, as Earth's moon disappeared from view during the month of May in the year 1110, with nary a reason given for the strange phenomenon. The unusual occurrence puzzled those who lived through it and continued to baffle astronomers throughout the ages. There was a belief that the moon's disappearance was the result of an eclipse.

The British astronomer George Frederick Chambers wrote about the celestial mystery in his 1899 book The Story of Eclipses. About 800 years after it happened, Chambers pegged the date of the eclipse as having occurred on May 5, during the reign of Henry I.

"The totality occurred before midnight," Chambers wrote of the moon's disappearance from the night sky, adding that it was “evident that this was an instance of a ‘black’ eclipse when the moon becomes quite invisible instead of shining with the familiar coppery hue.”

But is that really what happened?

Finding out the root of the lunar absence became the work of a 2020 study in the journal Scientific Reports, leading to a more complex answer than originally thought.

The previously agreed-upon conclusion was that an eruption at Iceland's Mount Hekla was the culprit. Hekla, located in the southern end of Iceland, was referred to as the "Gateway to Hell" by Europeans during the Middle Ages due to its frequent eruptions.

When an eruption took place at Hekla on approximately Oct. 15, 1104, sulfur-rich particles launched into the stratosphere. For many years, this event was thought to be the catalyst for the moon's apparent disappearance.

Hekla-e1650380217740.jpg


An eruption of Icelandic volcano Hekla, above, was thought to be the root cause of a multi-year disappearance of the moon. (Photo/Getty Images)

The Scientific Reports study, led by a team from the University of Geneva in Switzerland, began to unravel new information into the moon's whereabouts. To see whether the Hekla eruption was the sole cause of the disappearance, the researchers analyzed ice cores from Iceland and Antarctica, and eventually determined that the date of the Hekla eruption did not line up with the 1110 timeline of lunar absence.

To find the true source, researchers combed through the records of medieval times for any references made to a "dark lunar eclipse" or a "black eclipse." After pouring over many a scripture, the team made a breakthrough with the following 1110 entry from The Peterborough Chronicle: "[The moon] was so completely extinguished withal, that neither light, nor orb, nor anything at all of it was seen."

AP091202018742.jpg


The full moon is seen behind clouds above the village Gaiberg near Heidelberg, Germany, on Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Daniel Roland)

Knowing the lunar absence began around 1110, the team suggests a cluster of volcanic eruptions from between 1108 and 1110 was most likely the root cause, not the 1104 Hekla eruption as previously thought.

One of these oft-forgotten eruptions took place in 1108 in Honshu, Japan. A diary entry from a Japanese statesman, uncovered by researchers and cited in the Scientific Reports study, said that an eruption of Honshu's Mount Asama began in late August of 1108 and continued through that October.

"On August 29, there was a fire at the top of the volcano, a thick layer of ash in the governor's garden, everywhere the fields and the rice fields are rendered unfit for cultivation," the entry read. "We never saw that in the country. It is a very strange and rare thing."

MountAsama.jpg


Japan's Mount Asama, photographed here from a commercial airplane, was home to one of the oft-forgotten volcanic eruptions that led to a long-term lunar absence. (Getty Images)

The 1108 eruption at Asama, known as perhaps the most significant in the volcano's history, is one of what the study called "several major volcanic events" that is consistent with the "stratospheric aerosol loading sufficient to induce" the dark eclipse. Observations of changes to the moon, such as the dark, total lunar eclipse, as well as observations of dimming or discoloration of the sun, are major corroborators of the timing of major explosive volcanic activity.

On top of the eclipse, the 1108-1110 eruptions led to several societal impacts in Europe, particularly in agriculture. The researchers' work revealed descriptions of an abundance of severe weather conditions, crop failures and famines compared to other years with similar volcanic events. Losing the lunar connection between Earth and the moon had several negative side effects, making the bright nightly appearance missed all the more.
The moon is not what is shows.
The moon is giant space ship, this can be confirmed.
It is a very large star ship.
Another one, why does the light reflect off of the moon?
Because, light only reflects off of metal !
Another one, why do the impact craters on go so deep, they flatten out ?
Because, it is a the outer shell of the star ship !
Do some research and you too, will find more then you want ?
Also, last night over my AO, the big dipper was horizonal to the northern horizon !
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
The moon is not what is shows.
The moon is giant space ship, this can be confirmed.
It is a very large star ship.
Another one, why does the light reflect off of the moon?
Because, light only reflects off of metal !
Another one, why do the impact craters on go so deep, they flatten out ?
Because, it is a the outer shell of the star ship !
Do some research and you too, will find more then you want ?
Also, last night over my AO, the big dipper was horizonal to the northern horizon !
Yes, the moon is hollow and has other very interesting features all indicating that it is an artificial satellite...
 

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
If you couldn't see the moon, astronomy would have come full stop, because you couldn't see the stars either, as the moon is brighter than the stars. Is there any mention of the stars being missing from the skies, and if so, in what geographical areas.
 

tanstaafl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The Moon, is not made of dust.
It is made of metal, it is a Space ship.

Whatever floats your boat. Whether the Moon is real or a collective figment of the human imagination or something else entirely is not something I'm going to engage with someone about. You can take a True Believer of conspiracies to the Moon, put them in a spacesuit, walk them up to the Eagle lander, force their gloved hand to touch the lander, and they'll come back with something like, "That just proves the conspiracy is even bigger than I thought!"
 

West

Senior
Well here it goes...

Even Dennis will call me on this...my WAG...

How many people on this thread or are lurking been to the moon the space between here and the moon, above our uppermost atmosphere?

Please post here so I read your thoughts and insight.

Supposedly we started man flights and walked on the moon in 1969. Over 50 years ago.

50 years before 1969 it was 1919 here's some information about our technology of 1919..


We just started flying and in as little as 50 years we had airports in every large city and planes constantly flying just about anywhere in the world! 24/7.

I just gotta say wow! We are vary interesting humans and can do amazing things.

Let over 50 years ago we still don't have a resort or at least a habitable station on the moon.

So that's is the vary base of my argument that I can't say we did go to the moon, I question that because of the above facts.

Also I muse that there is bases on the moon. But they are the bases of fallen angels or the lord of the sky.

Not saying I believe 100% that we didn't land on the moon or there's evil on the moon. But the non historical current history on the moons mysteries and no real exploration of the moon for 50 years now. I have to wonder and keep a opened mind. Not so open my brains fall out, or the tinfoil to tight around my head.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Well here it goes...

Even Dennis will call me on this...my WAG...

How many people on this thread or are lurking been to the moon the space between here and the moon, above our uppermost atmosphere?

Please post here so I read your thoughts and insight.

Supposedly we started man flights and walked on the moon in 1969. Over 50 years ago.

50 years before 1969 it was 1919 here's some information about our technology of 1919..


We just started flying and in as little as 50 years we had airports in every large city and planes constantly flying just about anywhere in the world! 24/7.

I just gotta say wow! We are vary interesting humans and can do amazing things.

Let over 50 years ago we still don't have a resort or at least a habitable station on the moon.

So that's is the vary base of my argument that I can't say we did go to the moon, I question that because of the above facts.

Also I muse that there is bases on the moon. But they are the bases of fallen angels or the lord of the sky.

Not saying I believe 100% that we didn't land on the moon or there's evil on the moon. But the non historical current history on the moons mysteries and no real exploration of the moon for 50 years now. I have to wonder and keep a opened mind. Not so open my brains fall out, or the tinfoil to tight around my head.

there was a LOT of political stuff going on as to why we didn't try to set up a colony on the moon. I think we had and still have the skill levels, engineering abilities, and the bodies willing to give it a whirl. But russia was one of the biggest obstacles as to why we didn't settle there, dig into it, it's alluded to in the X Files, a couple of episodes anyway.
 

West

Senior
there was a LOT of political stuff going on as to why we didn't try to set up a colony on the moon. I think we had and still have the skill levels, engineering abilities, and the bodies willing to give it a whirl. But russia was one of the biggest obstacles as to why we didn't settle there, dig into it, it's alluded to in the X Files, a couple of episodes anyway.
I've dug into it.

Still not buying the lame reasons of why we don't have a base at least on the moon, 50 years after landing on it.
 
The moon is not what is shows.
The moon is giant space ship, this can be confirmed.
It is a very large star ship.
Another one, why does the light reflect off of the moon?
Because, light only reflects off of metal !
Another one, why do the impact craters on go so deep, they flatten out ?
Because, it is a the outer shell of the star ship !
Do some research and you too, will find more then you want ?
Also, last night over my AO, the big dipper was horizonal to the northern horizon !
What time did you observe the Big Dipper like this?
 

FNFAL1958

Senior Member
I read once that the reason for the moons brightness, was due to unusual high levels of Titanium dust in the lunar surface soil makeup. And that was brought to question by the folks that studied such things, as to what would cause such high levels.
 
NASA would know if that was true. Why so bright? Full sunshine, and nothing else around you in full sunshine to compare it with. Any photographers with spot light meters care to chime in? I think it’s supposed to be kinda gray.
 
I read once that the reason for the moons brightness, was due to unusual high levels of Titanium dust in the lunar surface soil makeup. And that was brought to question by the folks that studied such things, as to what would cause such high levels.
Somebody’s been pulling your leg and blowing smoke up your exhaust port.

“For example, the brightness of a full Moon is usually quoted at magnitude around –13, about 14 magnitudes or 400,000 times fainter than the Sun. (With a mean albedo, or reflectivity, of just 13%, the Moon is actually as dark as worn asphalt.)”
 
Top