USA Riot Control articles -- issues, how to do it

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
In four parts:

http://www.everyjoe.com/2017/01/30/politics/riot-control-discussion-training-effectiveness/#1

Read more: http://www.everyjoe.com/2017/01/30/...cussion-training-effectiveness/#ixzz4aKvq13Sq

Riot Control, Part 1
Posted in Politics
Mon, Jan 30 [2017] by Tom Kratman

"Since the enemy has decided to use rioters in an attempt to delegitimize and destabilize the current administration, it seems to me more than ordinarily worthwhile to discuss riot control.

My own background? Well, besides the law degree, which is of highly limited utility, I assure you, I was an infantry enlisted man, non-com, and company grade officer in what was probably the only portion of the US Armed Forces which actually knew its ass from a hole in the wall with regard to riot control. No, this was not the 82d. No, it was not any group of military police, nor the military police corps as a whole. No, it was not the National Guard. No, it wasn’t the Marine Corps.1

The 193rd Infantry Brigade – then in the Panama Canal Zone and now reduced to a mere basic training headquarters, on Fort Jackson, with no real continuity between the two – was the only US military organization of which I am aware that could control and suppress a riot. There were reasons for this, the big one being the 1964 Panama riots, which caught the Army completely by surprise and saw four American soldiers killed and, depending on whose figures one cares to believe, between twenty-one and one hundred and twenty-five or so Panamanians.2 These were not trivial riots in other words. From that day until perhaps the late 1980s, the 193rd took training for riot control very seriously, indeed.3

Seriously? What would you call but “serious” a routine exercise in which five soldiers playing rioters are bayonetted? What would you call a paired set of exercises in which twenty percent of each of the companies involved ends up in casts?4 What would you call an exercise in which twenty-one people have to be evacuated for CS5 inhalation, five of whom stop breathing on the Dustoff6 helicopters?

Two incidents of the way we used to do things resonate unusually strongly with me. In one case, to clear some of the OPFOR from the roof of a low building we had a technique. We’d simply toss up one or a few tough troops and he or they would have to fight it out on their own until help could scale ladders and beat the OPFOR off the roof. We had a nice kid in the company with a GT (roughly IQ) of 138, which is, surely you’ll agree, fairly smart. I knew this because, as company XO, I had access to any records I wanted. So this kid gets launched up and, before he can get to his feet the OPFOR grab him, carry him to the edge, and toss him off…head first. He landed on his head and the young private wasn’t so smart any more, at least so far as I knew him. A related technique involved using trucks rather than ladders.

The other incident concerned the Class IV (fortification / building materials, but in this case, barbed wire, concertina,7 engineer stakes and post pounders) truck. Wiring off areas as they are cleared is key to riot control, because you rarely have enough troops for the problem and need to recycle and reuse them. Hence, we got very good – not engineer levels of good but still very good – at building concertina fences in a hurry. One side effect of that was that there was a massive wad of tangled up concertina off to one side of the training area. So, when a few rioters swarmed the truck, the truck didn’t stop but kept on going. This meant that about fifteen rioters were left behind (in fact, jumping for their lives because, ya know, safety wasn’t a big thing with us). It also meant that five or so rioters were on a moving truck with a dozen mean-assed, armored up, shield and club bearing grunts.8 They were quickly beaten into submission. Then the truck moved to the big wad of old, rusty, nasty, tangled up concertina. And, then, one by one, the rioters were picked up and tossed onto the concertina….where they hung…ten feet off the ground…cut and bleeding…all day…without water…in better than ninety-five degree heat. And did I mention, all day? No, of course we didn’t help them get out after the exercise was over. “Well, if you insist, sir, but I say ‘**** ‘em,’” said the wise old sergeant. “Yeah…**** ‘em. Let ‘em hang. Mother****ers.”

It’s not like the carnage and outrage were one sided, either. Typically, a unit tasked to be OPFOR for a riot control exercise would start fermenting garbage from the mess hall. The more aggressive ones would start pissing and shitting in buckets and saving that in garbage cans. Then the glop – shit, piss, or garbage – would be put into baggies, tied off, and thrown at members of the riot control force with enough force to scatter the contents. It can kind of piss a normal man off, you know, to have shit thrown on him.

Some, it is true, were more civil and just threw mud, rocks, and dirt. But mud or rocks or shit, the objective was to get the riot control force to overreact, especially to break formation and charge, preferably with his baton raised, so the papers and television, which are the real enemy in riot control, could get pictures and video.

Some had lassos, with which they would try to drag the riot control force out of formation, which would also tend to break the formation and cause the good guys to charge. Sometimes, it wasn’t a lasso but a grappling hook on the end of the rope. Those can hurt.

Still others would make pikes, twelve or fifteen foot long sharpened poles, with which they would attempt to either break ribs through our flak vest (old style nylon, not all that much use, really), or smash face plates, or break legs.

We had face plates, the flip up-flip down kind, that seemed okay, provided that every company had a couple of cleaning teams to wash the face plates down when they got too filthy to see through. But then some enterprising sort figured out that the government issue squeeze bottle insect repellent not only had considerable range, but that the face plates, when doused with it, turned opaque and could not ever be cleaned. The formula was insect repellant + face plate = complete loss and blind or vulnerable soldier.

You’re not going to learn things like that from riot control training that consists of forming up in close ranks and half-stepping about a parking lot, half-stepping in both senses, with the troops chanting, “hut-hut-hut.”

There are some other things you get and things you learn from training like that. That’s next week’s subject."



__________

1 I saw a battalion of the Tenth Marines do a creditable job suppressing the Haitian riots in the Guantanamo migrant internment camps, but to some extent discount that because a) we had the numbers, b) we had considerable prep time, c) the Haitians were divided into sections already, which made the job easier, and, most importantly, d) the Haitians were conditioned by their own culture and the ruthlessness of the police of their half-assed excuse for a country to expect extreme frightfulness from the authorities. In other words, they folded almost instantly, once the flares went up and the Marine redlegs and the soldiers crossed into their camps.

2 I’m inclined to believe the higher figures, but we didn’t kill all of those. The Panamanian mounted police had an interesting technique for dealing with rioters. Two of them would come up on either side of one and each grab an arm. They would then gallop for the nearest telephone or street light pole and slam the rioter into it, head or chest first, at that full out gallop.

3 The skills and attitudes were apparently allowed to lapse after we agreed to surrender the Canal and had no more reason to expect Panamanian riots aimed at us. See, for example, the ass-whipping administered to the 193rd here: http://www.stripes.com/brutality-of-1994-panama-fight-still-resonates-with-u-s-troops-1.162729

4 This was unusually bad and illustrates a subtle lesson in training for riot control. In this case, two rifle company commanders, from different battalions, 4/10 and 3/5, on different sides of the Canal Zone, agreed to get together and take turns having their companies play opposing force for each other. What they missed was that infantry companies are not like rioters. Good ones, and these were both very good companies, tend to have massive social cohesion and guts. They will fight in a way rioters will not. The lesson there is that if you want to train for riot control, you must simulate rioters who act like rioters, not like Caesar’s legionaries.

5 Think: Tear gas +++

6 Aeromedical evacuation

7 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concertina_wire

8 Infantry

Tom Kratman is a retired infantry lieutenant colonel, recovering attorney, and science fiction and military fiction writer. His latest novel, The Rods and the Axe, is available from Amazon.com for $9.99 for the Kindle version, or $25 for the hardback. A political refugee and defector from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts, he makes his home in Blacksburg, Virginia. He holds the non-exclusive military and foreign affairs portfolio for EveryJoe. Tom’s books can be ordered through baen.com.
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
http://www.everyjoe.com/2017/02/06/politics/riot-control-stop-riot-before-out-of-hand/#1

Riot Control, Part 2

"What we appear to be seeing now, rioting crowd-wise, are actually rather small crowds. Have patience; if we don’t handle them properly, they’ll get bigger.

Taking the recent anti-Milo riots, at Berkeley, as an example1; one suspects, given the size, that at least the cadres leading and organizing the riots – oh, yes, they’re led and organized – were semi-professional.2 I would be terribly unsurprised to discover that they were even paid. Some of these may not be from the local area, but brought in from wherever, specifically for the purpose of organizing, leading, and exacerbating the rioting. I mean…you know…people don’t show up with pepper spray (not useful against protective mask-equipped riot control forces but good for stopping free speech from mere civilians), bats (for breaking windows and perhaps heads), dressed in black (probably both for intimidation and mutual identification and support), and with face masks, just spontaneously. They don’t come with flares in their pockets, either, unless they’re at least contemplating arson.

Arson; I mentioned last week that riots can be quite deadly. They not only kill people, they kill civilization. Anyone who doubts this I advise to take a drive through Detroit, sometime, a city which has never fully recovered from the riots that took place fifty years ago.3

So why do people riot? Why do people riot to that city-wrecking and life-ending extent? I would suggest there are three significant reasons: Outrage, fun, and profit. It’s not necessary, by the way, for everyone to feel a great deal of outrage. It’s sufficient if only a small cadre do, provided that cadre can provide fun and profit for a larger group.

Fun? Fun comes in with wrecking things, with rape, with arson, and in exercising power against the helpless. One can see this in the assault on “Katrina,” as shown on Stefan Molyneux’s podcast of 3 February, 2017.4 One could see it, too, in the attack on Reginald Denny, twenty-five years ago, during the Los Angeles riots or 1992.5 It’s fun to go wild. It’s fun to be out of control. It’s fun to hurt people. I’m sure that for some it’s fun to rape.

Those things, however, are not fun for everybody. You’ll have a hard time, ordinarily, getting a really big crowd for a gang rape in the streets. And it was, after all, only five men involved in the Reginald Denny beating out of tens of thousands rioting in Los Angeles.

But everyone likes a free TV set, or a nice piece of jewelry for the missus or the girlfriend, or a free (and unregistered) rifle or pistol, or a new Rolex. Cash is nice, too.

And that’s how these kinds of riots can typically get out of hand. First a small group of hardcore, dedicated rioters either show up on their own or infiltrate a peaceful protest. If they’re not stopped there, they create the anarchy of which all the most intense fun is made. That is also intended to attract a crowd sufficient to provide cover for the next steps, which include breaking safeguards – windows and doors, plus alarm systems – to desirable, lootable property. I say that windows and doors are safeguards, but what they also are are “moral” safeguards. Nobody wants to do the time for breaking and entering, and few of us are willing or eager to break windows and doors, but if it’s already been done by someone else then that becomes a different matter. That brings out the larger numbers of more normal, profit-minded folks, ever fearful that someone may get the color TV that – by rights, they’re pretty sure – really belongs to them. Once that happens, there is no controlling the riot without massive bloodletting. There’s also no accounting for the innocent blood that’s going to be shed, or the lives ruined, if that out of control riot is not suppressed.

Thus, given the limited pattern of small scale rioting we’ve seen since Trump’s inauguration, there are four tasks to be accomplished, maybe better said, four firebreaks to hold, to keep more of our cities from turning into Detroit: 1) Stop the cadre, 2) stop the fun, 3) prevent looting, 4) isolate and destroy the cadre. That means a particular set of rules of engagement. Those would read something like this:

1. Anyone seen carrying incendiaries will be shot to kill or maim. No specific additional warning will be given.

2. Anyone dressed in a mask that prevents identification, in the vicinity of an incipient or ongoing riot, will be presumed to intend felonious activity. They will be shot to kill or maim. No specific additional warning will be given.

3. Anyone seen wielding a weapon, including, but not limited to, firearms, clubs, machetes, knives, swords, or spears, will be presumed to intend the use of that weapon to commit or aid in the commission of a felony. They will be shot to kill or maim. No specific, additional warning will be given.

4. Anyone engaged in arson will be shot to kill or maim.

5. Anyone engaged in looting or encouraging looting by the breaking of safeguards will be shot to kill or maim.6

Oh, the horror, the horror; shooting people to defend mere property. No one should be surprised that I, personally, have no problem with that, but I admit I am in the minority there. However, no, it isn’t about defending property; it’s about removing the ultimate bait that turns a small riot into a huge one, which can turn a large city into a wreck. And don’t weep too much for the deservedly dead or mercifully maimed; they’ll have had sufficient warning, the first warning. If they’re shot for looting or breaking doors and windows to encourage looting, they’ll have volunteered for it. Note: Sixty-three people, most of them innocent, were killed in the 1992 Los Angeles riots. It seems to me only good math and good sense to shoot and kill a few of the people who would start that sort of riot all over again.

So how does this one play out for the next anti-First Amendment, anti-free speech fascismo-fest masquerading as an anti-fascist rally? I’d expect one of a couple of things to happen, initially. Presuming the Rules of Engagement, given above, are read out over a loudspeaker, then the riot cadre either drop their masks or they’re shot. If they refuse to drop their masks, I expect they’ll do so after a couple of them are shot. At that point, if they want to break a window or burn a building, or just assault young women and beat their husbands senseless, they’ll have to do it with identifiable faces showing such that, even if they’re not shot on the spot, they can be arrested, tried, and sent to the very worst prisons in the system.

Frankly, they’re wearing the masks for reasons, the big one being that they don’t want to do the time for the crime, so I’d expect there to be little or no arson, little or no breaking and entering, or breaking of safeguards, and hence not much of a riot. That’s a pity, really, because the more of them we shoot now the fewer we’ll have to shoot if we devolve into civil war, as still seems likely.

And speaking of war, which this is, anyway, we can reasonably expect the black shirted thugs to escalate once we do. There will be snipers, though competence may be beyond their reach. Thus, there must also be counter-snipers. More on that next week."





__________

1 http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/02/01/berkeley-braces-for-protests-at-yiannopoulos-talk/

2 As UC Berkeley Police Chief Margo Bennett put it, “It was a very practiced group that came in.” http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/02...reitbart-provocateur-milo-yiannopoulos-event/

3 And they were some doozies: https://vimeo.com/5337314. Here, have a second helping: https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=305_1457984327&comments=1. Looks kind of like a war zone, doesn’t it?

4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIFYTYNl7ng. H/T Vox Day

5 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Reginald_Denny

6 By the way, Rosie, you moronic twat, martial law looks a lot like that, too.

Read more: http://www.everyjoe.com/2017/02/06/politics/riot-control-stop-riot-before-out-of-hand/#ixzz4aKx23XaL
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
Part 3...

Riot Control, Part 3: What the well-dressed riot controller is wearing this year

Mon, Feb 13 [2017]

Read more: http://www.everyjoe.com/2017/02/13/politics/riot-control-what-riot-controllers-wear/#ixzz4aKxhnysn

"I’ve hinted already at my severe disenchantment with the riot control manual. Most of the following will tend to indicate some of why. Note that this is pretty military specific, but you all ought to know what’s happening, what should happen, and what isn’t happening with regards to riot control.

Head: Protection of the head involves also protection of the face, neck, and, especially, the eyes. The standard military issue Kevlar helmet is adequate for protecting the head from blunt force trauma and even some bullets1. It does nothing for the face. There are shields that attach to the helmets to protect the face and which usually reach down enough for neck guard. However, after a cursory search or three for what’s on offer now, as with the old style ones I discussed previously, they can be blurred and ruined with solvents. Yes, this would seem to include polycarbonate as well; that’s how pieces of Lexan are glued together, actually. It’s a problem. Neither can I find a face shield that is glass over Lexan, though they may exist.

Moreover, while there are masks – nicely intimidating motorcycle rider masks, for example – that are black and which could have relatively cheap replaceable clear eyepieces made, they are close fitting, hence would interfere with donning the protective mask when it comes time to use RCA2 or when smoke from burning buildings gets to be a bit much. The only solution I can see is twofold: 1) Have a ready supply of extra face shields on hand, and 2) make the immediate penalty for attacking a mask with solvents a reasonably severe beating with some kicks and stomping.

Special Tip #1: If you’re using your issued helmets, troops and commanders, turn the camouflage band around so the rioters can’t see your name. This is for two reasons. One is to prevent personal retaliation against your men or their families. The other is to send a message the rioters will understand very clearly because they’re using anonymity for the same purpose, to stay out of court. In other words, the message you send is, “Get close enough to this soldier or policeman for him to hurt you and he will, all the more readily because you can’t identify him for civil suit or criminal complaint.

Chest: The current issue torso armor seems adequate for most threats it will encounter in riot control, but, at thirty-three pounds, strikes me as awfully heavy for an activity that is already about as physically intense as a battlefield, if not even more so. With an E-SAPI plate in front, that runs nearly to forty pounds, which is simply too damned much. There is room for some minor weight savings, as will be shown below, under “Protective Mask.”

There are lighter and quite likely better armor suites coming along or already on hand for the special operations folks, but if they are not available for a unit tasked for riot control, I’ll have to say, “Suck it up; wear the vests you have; keep about ten percent of your force in reserve, unarmored but ready and drilled to suit up in a hurry, to relieve people who become exhausted from the weight and heat retention.

Special Tip #2: You want the armor not only to protect your men, but also to protect them enough to keep them from losing their tempers and running wild. When they hurt somebody, it needs to be because the commander wants that somebody hurt, that the mission is advanced by that somebody being hurt, and not because of a breakdown in discipline.

Armament: For a number of reasons, I recommend against using bayoneted rifles. The downsides are numerous, so I’ll limit myself to a few. 1) They require both hands; this means that the riot controller cannot use a shield. 2) The act of fixing bayonets, all on its own, constitutes deadly force.3 Yeah, just fixing them. So you won’t be allowed to do it. 3) That means you end up with this bullshit:

police-gun-flower.jpg


Instead, use batons. However, for that I have no less than two tips.

Special Tip #3: Grease the last eighteen inches or so of the batons with something non-water soluble, like Vaseline. No, this is not as an aid to anally raping the rioters with the batons, however tempting that may come to seem. Rather, it is to keep the rioters from snatching your batons away, which snatching encourages them to no end. If you don’t have petroleum jelly handy, thicker rifle lubricant, like LSA, can work, but spread it very thinly, so it doesn’t run.4

Special Tip #4: Drive finishing nails into the ends of your batons and snip them off to leave about an inch sticking out. No need to sharpen the part sticking out; it’s sharp enough to penetrate and leave a painful puncture wound, whether directed at arms or torsos or thighs or groins (ouch!).

Shields: There are any number of makers of perfectly serviceable riot control shields, some of which are, although frightfully heavy, bullet proof. If you need bullet proof shields, I would suggest that you’re way past the point of suppressing a riot and already involved in a civil war. In that case, shoot back accordingly.

Assuming for discussion’s sake, however, that we aren’t quite at that point yet, the shields are extremely useful. They deflect rocks and bags of shit. They can cause a Molotov to go off somewhere other than on the riot controller or at his feet. They are, themselves, offensive weapons. As Suetonius said, just before kicking Boudicca’s Britannic ass: “Knock them down with your shields, then finish them off with your swords.”

bandido.jpg


The world being as it is, however, full of iniquity and injustice, when Battalion X of the YYth division gets alerted for riot control, the shields will probably not be available. A careful search by J4 will show that “They are either in Iraq or were left behind on Johnson Island, lest Greenpeace show up some day. Or maybe they were turned into a reef for some endangered fish. Who knows?” Hence, make your own.

The example above was made by one of the handier troops of B-3/5 Infantry, Panama Canal Zone, in 1983. It’s just half inch plywood, 19 by 24 inches, though they can be cut larger to fit the larger troops, with arm straps cut from condemned nylon webbing and bolted on. The almost horizontal piece is one shoulder strap from the harness of nylon load bearing equipment, stapled on and serving as a shock pad for the arm. Yes, if you actually have to make something like these do not forget the shock pad. I’d recommend not painting them with unit insignia. We were, at the time, on testosterone overload and wanted people to know who was kicking their butts.

Note, a larger shield doesn’t necessarily protect more, it just moves more slowly to protect what needs protection. These shields are very light and, given the geometry of the matter, able to be moved very quickly indeed to protect any exposed part of the body, to include the thighs and crotch. Speaking of the …

Crotch: Move your/have the troops move their protective mask and carrier from the left hip to right in front of the family jewels. It won’t slow down donning the mask appreciably and it will save a little weight while providing adequate crotch coverage.

More next week."



Read more: http://www.everyjoe.com/2017/02/13/politics/riot-control-what-riot-controllers-wear/#ixzz4aKxxLWvI
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
Part 4, the last of it...

Riot Control, Part 4

Mon, Feb 20 [2017]

"Of course, we should have been preparing for really serious riots starting several years ago. It was probably too much, though, to expect the same administration doing everything possible to encourage rioting to expend the money, time, and effort needed to suppress rioting. Why, next thing you know, people will be asking the government to undo the anti-white racism and anti-heterosexual sexism that’s been all the rage for most of the last eight years. And we can’t have that, now, can we?

Ahem.

In any case, we probably don’t have long to prepare. The riots that were small, in poor weather, at the inauguration, may well become quite large this spring and summer. Moreover, the enemy – and they are the enemy – has been getting in a lot of useful practice. As an ideal, it would be nice to raise a force of professional riot control police, maybe to the size of a large division. Again, though, there probably just isn’t time for that.

There might be time to retrain the armed forces, partially. In theory, of course, they do train for riot control. In practice? Well…no…not so much. Instead they go through the motions, execute formations, “hut-hut-hut” themselves about bare parking lots and parade grounds, and in general waste a little time, perhaps as often as annually.

The formations are considerably less effective than they are complex. FM3-19.15, Civil Disturbance Operations, lists five, plus the implicit one of troops in column, plus a number of variables for tactical situations that, frankly, are almost always beyond the scope of the unit concerned to deal with anyway. I don’t generally recommend four of the five, if for no other reason because they cause the troops to move far too slowly to gain moral ascendency over the rioters. What I do recommend is a technique worked out by the troops themselves, down in Panama, in the 80s. It requires one formation, a portable loudspeaker, a certain understanding of mob psychology, and aggressiveness. Lightweight shields are certainly useful.

The one formation is on line, something the troops don’t need much practice in assuming. It can and should be a partially double line, with some non-lethal weapons in the back, along with perhaps a few buckshot-loaded shotguns for dealing with armed or incendiary rioters, and a snatch team or a few of them. Designated marksman probably need to be under tighter control, adjacent to, or in radio contact with and following the direct orders of commanders: “The masked one in the red jacket carrying a flaming bottle towards that McDonald’s; shoot him.”

It takes a little training, though less than what’s called for in the manual, and looks like this:

1. The troops, as they march in column to the point of forming the line, should be pounding their shields with their batons, one whack per left step. It should sound like a single, drawn out, fearfully powerful blow, to remind the rioters of what’s in store for them and to give the faint-hearted a chance to leave while they can. This will serve to partially demoralize those of somewhat stouter hearts, but who are not fanatical cadre.

2. The troops are brought to “mark time…march” (marching in place), but continue pounding their shields in time together.

3. The command is given to form a line; the lead platoon’s squads move out following their squad leaders, and, on command, face toward the rioters. Other platoons move up and continue to fan out to the flanks of the lead platoon. If the area is wide, quite likely more companies are deploying, too. They’re all still pounding their shields.

4. The commander, through his portable loudspeaker, gives the preparatory commands: “Ready…Ready…Ready…” The troops change to beating their batons frenziedly, bending their left legs, moving their right legs back as if to sprint, and positioning their shields to their front.

5. The commander orders “Rush!” The troops launch themselves forward. Most of the rioters will run and probably faster, both for not being as encumbered and for having a head start. Some, being braver than the rest, will delay too long for an escape. These the troops knock over with their shields and then smash with kicks, stomps, and downward strokes of the batons. The objective isn’t just inflicting pain but also damage. Don’t draw it out or make a Rodney King beating out of it. Knock them down and hurt them quickly and decisively. The second, thinner line flexicuffs them. They should leave by ambulance. Women rioters should not be knocked down but pushed forward and prodded with the nails in the ends of the batons. I’ll explain why, later on.

6. The rush stops at a pre-rehearsed fifteen meters and the troops dress the line (= get back into a line). Note, at this point you have already set a pattern; when the troops get ready to charge, rioters run like hell.

7. The rioters will slowly regather their courage. (Be fair; it’s tougher for them because, unlike a unit of infantry, engineers, tankers, air defense, or artillery, they are not a cohesive body to begin with.) As they do, they’ll begin to filter back to what we might call confrontation distance. Again the commander orders, “Ready…Ready…Ready…” but doesn’t give the “Rush!” Why not? Because they’ll have started to run again at the first or second “ready.” Instead, the commander orders, “cancel…cancel” and then marches the troops forward on line, into the space just vacated by the rioters, at a normal thirty-inch step.

8. At that point, having run from a threat that didn’t materialize, the riot cadres are humiliated and their followers more doubtful about their ability to take on the riot control force. Repeat the exercise, this time with a, “Rush!” The cadres will be slower to run, meaning they can be caught up to, or more of them can, and, again, be sent to the hospital, thence to jail, then to prison to be made non-anally retentive.

It’s up to the commander on the ground to judge when to actually rush, when to march into the vacuum, and when to cancel. He and the troops can have a lot of fun this way, by the way, and the rioters will not like it a bit. Moreover, even though not nearly as heavily laden, this exercise will start to wear them out a lot faster than it will the troops.

Ah, but what if the rioters don’t run, but hundreds (and hundreds) of them decide to stand and fight? Be still my heart. Oh, joy; oh happy-happy-joy-joy. These assholes know how to posture, but fight as a group, by which I mean a collective and mutually supportive action, not just a lot of people fighting at the same time? It is to laugh. If they try to stand, you don’t send a few to the hospital. You send them all to the hospital…or the morgue; whatever the market will bear. Rubber bullets, you know, fired from point blank range, are not necessarily non-lethal.

Now, since this is the last one I intend to do for this subject anytime soon, a few more tips:

1) The press is not only the enemy; they must be presumed to be an utterly unprincipled and dishonest enemy. Anything and everything the riot control force does will be filmed and, if necessary, edited, to present it in the worst possible light. Therefore, they must have their own camera teams recording everything to both clear themselves of wrongdoing or spurious charges of indiscipline, as well as to discredit the press which will have edited the truth heavily. NB: There is no real limit to how dishonest the modern press can be and will be in support of the leftist agenda. There is no placating them. There is no degree of righteous conduct they will not twist into wrongdoing. There is thus no sense in trying to placate them, in trying to be nice, in tightly limiting violence, etc.; because they will lie about you and all those who want to believe their lies will.

2) Riot Control Women. They’re rather preposterous, in the main, if employed on the riot control line. It’s one of the reasons why MPs have for long been useless at riot control; they’re simply too heavily laden with women, who almost universally lack the size, strength, and aggressiveness for hand to hand combat with stone age weapons. Indeed, while the infantry and other combat and combat support unit in the old 193rd were excellent at riot control, the MPs – yes, I have seen it – were useless. Worse, riot control is a perfect environment to cause what the Israeli’s found out when they mixed men and women in the same units in their War of Independence; men will abandon the mission to succor one of their own women. This is the fault of the men, by the way, and not of the women, but it is even more the fault of the dogmatic shitheads of the left who refuse to see men and women for what they are.

3) Rioting women. I don’t care if you have a warrant for their arrest for murder, arson, mayhem, and massacre, plus cellulite and bad makeup, do not arrest or detain them at the scene. Shoot them if their conduct (to include dress) warrants it, but otherwise just push them away or wound them slightly and push them away. Why? Because, though ill-disciplined rabble, for the most part, the rioters are also mostly male and will also rush to the defense of “their” women. There is no better substitute for the cohesion and moral fiber a mob usually lacks than going after the women in the mob. They can turn ferocious very quickly, indeed, if you do.

...And that’s all good and maybe it will get us through the summer, should it turn out as badly as it might, but, America, I suspect that you and the president are ultimately still going to need a dedicated, well trained, highly mobile, professional force for riot suppression."



Read more: http://www.everyjoe.com/2017/02/20/politics/riot-control-training-suppression-tips/#ixzz4aKz9rJ9T
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
Note this paragraph from the 4th page...

For anyone who has the delusion that ANY women belong in even a field policing military unit:

"Riot Control Women. They’re rather preposterous, in the main, if employed on the riot control line. It’s one of the reasons why MPs have for long been useless at riot control; they’re simply too heavily laden with women, who almost universally lack the size, strength, and aggressiveness for hand to hand combat with Stone Age weapons. Indeed, while the infantry and other combat and combat support unit in the old 193rd were excellent at riot control, the MPs – yes, I have seen it – were useless. Worse, riot control is a perfect environment to cause what the Israeli’s found out when they mixed men and women in the same units in their War of Independence; men will abandon the mission to succor one of their own women. This is the fault of the men, by the way, and not of the women, but it is even more the fault of the dogmatic shitheads of the left who refuse to see men and women for what they are."
 

Sentinel

Veteran Member
Former combat MP Lieutenant here. I'd like to tell the author how wrong he is about the MPs being crippled because of women. I'd like to but...

Of course they'd just pull the women out before things got too bad. And God help any soldier or junior officer who grumbles about it. I got in regular hot water at Officer Basic in the mid-80s for pointing it out because, each time we'd march to a range or to the field, they'd load the women up in trucks and we had to carry the squad gear ourselves. They way they finally got us (men) to shut up is, if we fussed, we not only had to carry all the squad gear alone but also had to carry the WOMEN's rucks their as well (while they were being trucked their) because "well, what if we were in combat and your buddy was hit. You'd help with his stuff, wouldn't you?" Yeah, right Captain. And stick it while you are at it.
 
Top