ILL IMM REPUBLICAN SELLOUT IN FULL SWING MODE 1-27-2015

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
:eleph: The Republican treason, just like Doomer Doug said would happen on illegal immigration is now complete. NOTHING WILL BE DONE TO REVERSE THE TYRANT OBAMA'S COUP D'ETAT CREATING A PERMANENT DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY VOTERS. NOTHING WILL BE DONE TO PREVENT DEMOCRATIC MARXISTS FROM BEING IN CONTROL FOR DECADES INTO THE FUTURE.

YEP, THE ARMED MILITIAS WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH BOTH OBAMA AND THE TRAITOR, RINO REPUBLICANS.


http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...licans-abandon-immigration-campaign-promises/

Obama Approval Rating At 50 Percent As Republicans Abandon Immigration Campaign Promises

President Barack Obama’s approval rating is as high as it’s been since mid-2013, reaching 50 percent on Monday according to Gallup.

“Less than a week after President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union address to Congress, his job approval rating reached 50% in Gallup Daily tracking conducted Friday through Sunday,” Gallup’s Lydia Saad wrote on Monday. “This is the first time the president’s rating has returned to that level in Gallup’s ongoing three-day rolling averages since June 2013.”

This comes as Republicans have backed down from several immigration campaign promises as they seek to “govern” rather than follow through on what they said they were going to do.

Republicans, in late 2014 in the lame duck session of Congress, passed a 1,774-page, $1.1 trillion “cromnibus” spending bill that funded Obama’s executive amnesty—despite prior campaign trail promises from almost every Republican candidate and Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus that Republicans would block funding for it. Not one member of Congress had time to read the text of the cromnibus bill before voting for it.

It wasn’t until the new Congress was seated in early 2015—and after a nearly successful coup attempt against Speaker John Boehner by 25 Republicans in his conference—that the House passed a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spending bill that blocks funding for Obama’s executive amnesty.

The cromnibus debate handed GOP leverage to Obama and then outgoing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — Boehner relied on Democrat votes to pass it. Still, the House-passed the DHS funding bill could block funding for Obama’s executive amnesty—if the Senate passes it and Republicans could convince Obama to sign it despite his veto threat. Senate Republicans say they will “try” to pass the House-passed bill, but they need to convince at least six Democrats to support it to get past cloture since there are only 54 Republicans in the new GOP-controlled Senate.

In response to Obama’s State of the Union speech last week, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) didn’t mention Obama’s executive amnesty at all. She seems to have since learned that she made a mistake in doing that as she hammered the president’s executive amnesty on stage at the Iowa Freedom Summit in Des Moines this weekend, but the other official Republican response to Obama’s State of the Union—from pro-amnesty freshman Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), in Spanish—actually talked about support for amnesty.

Meanwhile, the Senate Judiciary Committee is moving forward with the nomination of Loretta Lynch to replace Eric Holder as Attorney General of the United States, despite a campaign promise from now Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell that Republicans wouldn’t support her nomination if she supported Obama’s executive amnesty.

A hearing on Wednesday and Thursday of this week will feature Lynch on her own panel and other high-profile witnesses including liberal law professor Jonathan Turley, True The Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht and investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson on another. With Turley—who opposes Obama’s executive amnesty—testifying, however, Republicans may end up upholding McConnell’s campaign pledge after all if Lynch doesn’t testify against Obama’s executive amnesty, but that remains to be seen.

Newly seated Senate Immigration Subcommittee chairman Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) told Breitbart News that Obama’s improving numbers show that Republicans need to understand they must stand up for American workers instead of special interests and foreign workers in the immigration debate.

“The economy is not performing well,” Sessions said in an emailed statement to Breitbart News.

Real family incomes are down $4,200 since 2009, the share of people working has dipped to levels not seen in nearly four decades, and the technology sector is laying off people in massive numbers. Food stamp use remains at historic highs, while 1 in 4 Americans aged 25–54 are not employed. We must expose the true facts about what is happening to our workforce, and how the President’s policies are hammering working America. At the pinnacle of this anti-worker agenda is the President’s decision to violate federal law in order to provide work permits and benefits to 5 million unlawful immigrants. As one wise observer noted, the most important feature of governing is to defend our founding charter.

In a new op-ed on Monday evening for Breitbart News, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) lays out what she’s doing to eliminate amnesty.

I have fought the President’s amnesty relentlessly and will continue to do so. Last summer I worked with Senator Ted Cruz of Texas to freeze the President’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program by passing a bill out of the House. On January 14th, the House passed my Amendment to the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill to once again freeze DACA. The DACA program grants work permits to illegal aliens between the ages of 15 and 33. (subject to limited exception, applicants must have been under the age of 31 as of June 15, 2012 and at least 15 years or older to request DACA according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services). I do not believe that President Obama should be putting the needs of illegal aliens over American citizens.

Rep. Rod Blum (R-IA), one of the newly elected Republicans who emboldened the House GOP majority by winning a previously Democrat-controlled seat, said he campaigned and won on securing the border.

“I campaigned for two years in Eastern Iowa and everyone talked about immigration,” Blum said in an interview with Breitbart News at the Iowa Freedom Summit in Des Moines this weekend.

First of all, secure the border. In 1986, President Reagan—they passed an amnesty. They promised as American citizens they were going to secure the border, they didn’t follow through. In 2006, when George Bush was president, they had a secure the border build the fence act and they never followed through and did that. Look, they haven’t followed through twice. Not only is it an immigration issue, it’s a national security issue.

There are three amendments that have been offered to a recent bill from House Homeland Security Committee chairman Rep. Mike McCaul (R-TX)—two from Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA) and one from Rep. Steve King (R-IA)—that aides tell Breitbart News would, if added into the McCaul bill during the House Rules Committee process, fix that bill.

One Brat amendment would not consider the border secure until the president’s 2014 executive amnesty, the so-called Morton Memos of non-enforcement, and the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program of 2012 were each ended. The second Brat amendment would create a mechanism that would allow Border Patrol to end Obama’s catch-and-release policies, and deport illegal aliens immediately upon capture rather than sending them to ICE processing facilities at which point they’re likely to be kept in the United States. The King amendment would require that all 700 miles of double-layer border fencing required under the Secure Fence Act of 2006 be built, instead of just the 48 miles of double-layer fencing in the bill right now.

It remains to be seen what happens with the McCaul border bill—and whether it passes as is, or gets the fixes included in it that would fulfill GOP election promises to secure the border.
Read More Stories About:

Big Government, Homeland Security, Obama, Immigration, Michael McCaul, approval ratings, Rep. Marsha Blackburn, Border Fence
by Taboola
 

Dosadi

Brown Coat
As I said (told ya so).

Nothing will change. There may be differences in what they say, but what they do is pure statist oligarchy tyranny from both republicrats and democanz.

Zero effective outcome.

How's that voting for the lesser of two evils working out for ya?

Thought so.
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane
This does not surprise me! I think that all the legislative manuevers are window dressing for what they really want to do. I don't think there is an answer to this through the political process. I am unaware of how I may benefit from illegal labor but that doesn't mean it isn't happening behind the scenes. It may be necessary to keep a list of employers that use illegal labor just as refugeewatch.wordpress.com keeps track of the church denominations that foster refugee resettlement in other people's towns.
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
Lutheran Family Services has done more to destroy the United States than the Communists have for the last several decades. The Lutherans have brought in HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SO CALLED "REFUGEES," PUT THEM ON THE GOVERNMENT DOLE AND THEN SPEWED THEM OUT ALL OVER THE USA.
 
They have no fear, line after line in the sand has been crossed, they now know they can do as they please unimpeded.

This week as I saw that the betrayal was not going to be reversed I crossed my "line in the sand". The depths of my disdain for them knows no bounds. They will pay down the line when the economy finally collapses. No place will be safe for them. They will be the enemy of all, no friends, just bodyguards, (who can also betray when it suits their purposes).
 

shinerbock

Innocent Bystander
Cruz is the only serious opponent of illegal immigration. He doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of surviving the primary game.
Not that I'm a fan - He reminds me of an old time 60s-70s TV cartoon character and I can't for the life of me think who. Help, anyone? It has much to do with the voice and the eyes.

TIA, this is driving me crazy!
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
As I said (told ya so).

Nothing will change. There may be differences in what they say, but what they do is pure statist oligarchy tyranny from both republicrats and democanz.

Zero effective outcome.

How's that voting for the lesser of two evils working out for ya?

Thought so.


^ THIS



But remember: WE are responsible. Had we just voted for Romney, all would have been unicorns and paradise...
 

Flippper

Time Traveler
Hate to say I told you so (and yes, I really hate it) but....I TOLD YOU SO. Their bosses are the globalists, not We The People. They do as they are told so those kiddie porn files on their computers are not turned over to the press, the homosexual activities are not exposed. They prefer mammon to joining up and as one voice bucking the globalists, facing their corruption and accepting the punishment from those who they enslave. They are bottom scum satanic fools.

But not to worry. Sarah Palin will save you. :lkick:
 

Raggedyman

Res ipsa loquitur
Still No Power To "We The People".

yes indeed Cobra . . . STILL and there will be NO power until we the people take it by refusing to play their game any more:

no banking
no credit cards
barter
cash purchases to avoid sales tax
encourage and GROW the underground economy as much as possible
avoid any and all taxes you possibly can
refuse to participate in what ever you can that contributes in any way to the system at large - LOOK FOR IT - it IS there

WIN THE GAME BY REFUSING TO PLAY​

there are many ways to starve the beast - only just begin it - and remember this - if it's to BE it's up to ME
 
As I said (told ya so).

Nothing will change. There may be differences in what they say, but what they do is pure statist oligarchy tyranny from both republicrats and democanz.

Zero effective outcome.

How's that voting for the lesser of two evils working out for ya?

Thought so.

I gave the system every chance for peaceful change. I don't feel like a fool for having done that because I know where the next road leads to. I take my politics seriously. This is not a game. And they will not let you opt out of the system. They will come for you, if you try. They will write new laws to further corral you into total obedience, (or else).

There is only one way forward after this juncture has been reached.
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
The extent of the REPUBLICAN TREASON IS NOW BECOMING CLEAR. The Republicans were elected on a "seal the border, deport the foreign, disease ridden filth, build a border fence etc. What we are now getting is a 550 mile REDUCTION in the border fence, as well as an increase, by TENS OF THOUSANDS of additional foreign Information Technology workers. We are getting HORDES OF DISEASE RIDDEN FOREIGN FILTH, TENS OF THOUSANDS OF MUSLIM TERRORISTS/REFUGEES FROM SYRIA ETC.

Boner is a TRAITOR! Mcdonnell is a TRAITOR. The Republicans will do NOTHING TO STEM THE ILLEGAL TIDE . BY THE WAY WE ARE ALSO NOW LOOKING AT A TIDAL WAVE FROM CUBA DUE TO OBAMA'S DIPLOMATIC MOVES. Florida will be solidly democratic for the next fifty years!



http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/230958-gop-looks-for-escape-plan-on-immigration

Republican leaders look for escape plan on immigration

Republican leaders in the House and Senate are boxed in on immigration and searching for a way out.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) are struggling to find a way to fund the Department of Homeland Security while meeting conservative demands to unwind President Obama’s executive actions giving legal status to millions of immigrants who would otherwise face deportation.


Congress is only scheduled to be in session for three weeks in February, giving lawmakers little time to craft a funding bill that would prevent an embarrassing shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Feb. 28.

On Tuesday, the two began wiggling their way out of the tight spot:

• To please conservative critics, Boehner announced at a morning GOP conference meeting that the House would sue the administration for giving de facto legal status to millions of illegal immigrants without congressional approval.

• A day after pulling a House border security bill drafted by Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul (R-Texas) from a planned floor vote, GOP leaders said McCaul and Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) would work together to create a new, tougher border bill.

• McConnell announced at an afternoon press conference that the Senate will vote next week on a House-passed bill funding the DHS but reversing Obama’s executive actions.

• Sen. Roy Blunt (Mo.), the vice chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, pledged at a press conference that Senate Republicans would do “everything we can to persuade at least half a dozen Democrats that they should join us,” adding, “you don’t know how these legislative battles go if you don’t have them, and we intend to have this one.”

McConnell and Boehner have a ways to go before they are in the clear, however.

And a familiar endgame — in which Boehner is forced to move legislation through the House with broad Democratic support — could be inevitable.

The House bill is destined for failure in the Senate, where GOP leaders lack the votes to overcome a Democratic filibuster.

Almost the entire Senate Democratic caucus signed a letter Tuesday stating, “the House bill cannot pass the Senate” and urging McConnell to move a clean bill.

A lawsuit is likely to take years to wend its way through the courts, giving little satisfaction to conservative voters who want to see immediate action.

Conservatives have been divided over the McCaul bill, and it is unclear whether GOP leaders can make it more palatable by merging it with Goodlatte’s legislation, which deals with asylum claims and other issues related to enforcement.

McConnell on Tuesday declined to reveal whether he would allow Democrats to offer amendments to the House bill when it is considered in the Senate or how he would proceed if Democrats filibuster it.

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said the House bill would come directly to the Senate floor but acknowledged leaders have yet to firm up a plan should it fail.

“I would say all options are on the table. There hasn’t been any decision made, so we’re considering that full range of options,” he said.

Some of the options were discussed at a Republican Steering Committee meeting last week.

The GOP could strip the House provision on Obama’s executive actions and instead add language strengthening border security or expanding H-1B visas for high-skilled workers.

A proposal supported by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) to lift the caps on the number of H-1B high-skilled visas issued per country passed the House 389-15 in 2011.

One Senate GOP source said the upper chamber could add whichever version of the McCaul-Goodlatte border security and interior enforcement bill passes the House.

Allowing Obama’s executive actions to stand and adding components of immigration reform favored by Republicans might persuade a group of centrist Democrats to join with the majority of the Senate GOP conference to pass an alternative.

But it would likely face a party-line vote and a mass of conservative defections in the House.

And winning over Democratic senators would not be easy; Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and other members of the Senate Democratic leadership would fight efforts to pass piecemeal immigration reform on an appropriations bill.

Senate Republicans could try to sweeten the deal by adding other elements of immigration reform favored by Democrats to the Homeland Security funding bill.

That might build a bipartisan majority in both chambers but would likely prompt a harsh reaction from the GOP base.

Scott Wong and Cristina Marcos contributed.
Tags: John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Immigration
 

ltd

Higher Ground
As I said (told ya so).

Nothing will change. There may be differences in what they say, but what they do is pure statist oligarchy tyranny from both republicrats and democanz.

Zero effective outcome.

How's that voting for the lesser of two evils working out for ya?

Thought so.
Two Wings of the same Bird ....jpg
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
The Republican love fest with this Lynch Traitor IS DISGUSTING.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-...eneral-nominee-who-might-be-even-worse-eric-h




Meet Loretta Lynch – Obama’s Attorney General Nominee Who Might Be Even Worse than Eric Holder
Tyler Durden's picture
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 01/30/2015 22:20 -0500

Barack Obama
Cronyism
Department of Justice
Iran
national security
New York Times
Nomination
Obama Administration
President Obama
Recession
Richard Blumenthal
Sheldon Whitehouse
South Carolina
Testimony
Wall Street Journal



inShare6


Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

On matters of policy, Ms. Lynch called capital punishment “an effective penalty” and said she disagreed with Mr. Obama’s statements that marijuana was no more harmful than alcohol. She called the National Security Agency’s collection of American phone records “certainly constitutional, and effective.”



– From the New York Times article: Criticism of Holder Dominates Hearing on Loretta Lynch, Attorney General’s Possible Successor

Eric Holder made a career out of protecting and coddling financial oligarchs (his 1999 memo essentially invented “Too Big to Jail”). This was such a lucrative decision for Mr. Holder, that it allowed him to climb all the way to the top of his profession. The dividends that supporting this man ultimately paid to Wall Street criminals were priceless. Not only were they bailed out despite wrecking the U.S. economy, they have since funneled all of the wealth gains since 2008 to themselves, while remaining above the law. This truly remarkable heist is what both Barack Obama and Eric Holder will be remembered for by history. Congratulations guys.

When Eric Holder announced his resignation, many of us breathed a sigh of relief thinking it can’t get much worse, but not so fast. The authoritarian streak and rampant cronyism of the Obama administration is a well oiled machine. You didn’t think you’d get off that easily did you? Enter Loretta Lynch.

I’ve touched upon Mrs. Lynch’s record previously, in the post, Wall Street Journal Reports Obama’s Attorney General Nominee Has Been Involved in $904 Million in Asset Forfeitures. Here’s an excerpt:

As a prosecutor Ms. Lynch has also been aggressive in pursuing civil asset forfeiture, which has become a form of policing for profit. She recently announced that her office had collected more than $904 million in criminal and civil actions in fiscal 2013, according to the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. Liberals and conservatives have begun to question forfeiture as an abuse of due process that can punish the innocent.

Naturally, that was just the tip of the iceberg. What we have learned from her ongoing confirmation hearing is that she’s a lover of NSA spying and the death penalty, while disagreeing with the statement that “marijuana is no more harmful than alcohol.”

I wonder if she has much personal experience to base this opinion on, or if it’s just more of the same we “know what’s best for you plebs, despite the fact that we have no idea what we are talking about.”

Meet the new Attorney General, same as the old. From the New York Times:

Ms. Lynch had steeled herself for tough questioning from a new Republican-controlled Judiciary Committee, particularly on her views of President Obama’s immigration policy. But the questioning was mostly cordial, and, most important, the Republicans on the committee who hold the key to Ms. Lynch’s confirmation — she needs three of their votes to proceed to a vote by the full Senate — showed little opposition.

Of course it was cordial. Other than perhaps immigration, she basically espouses complete and total neo-con principals.

On the issue of immigration, Ms. Lynch said she found it “reasonable” that the Justice Department had concluded it was lawful for Mr. Obama to unilaterally ease the threat of deportation for millions of unauthorized immigrants. Mr. Holder similarly endorsed that view.



Democrats see some Republicans, such as Senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Orrin G. Hatch of Utah and Jeff Flake of Arizona, as possible confirmation votes. Mr. Flake said he had made no decision on Ms. Lynch but had come away with a favorable impression and expected that she would be confirmed.



On matters of policy, Ms. Lynch called capital punishment “an effective penalty” and said she disagreed with Mr. Obama’s statements that marijuana was no more harmful than alcohol. She called the National Security Agency’s collection of American phone records “certainly constitutional, and effective.”



Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat on the panel, said she had given “a flawless performance.” Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, called her testimony “among the most accomplished and impressive that I’ve seen as a member of this committee.”

Oh, but there’s more. As if you needed proof that Ms. Lynch shares Eric Holder’s financial oligarch coddling tendencies, the International Business Times reports that:

WASHINGTON — In advance of her nomination hearing, Loretta Lynch did what every cabinet nominee is required to do: fill out a questionnaire listing all her media interviews so lawmakers can evaluate her candor. But the questionnaire U.S. attorney general nominee Lynch submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee has a notable omission. Lynch failed to include an interview in which she defended the controversial settlement she orchestrated with the bank HSBC.



The bank was accused of knowingly allowing Mexican drug cartels to launder money and of allowing violations of economic sanctions against countries including Iran, Libya, Sudan and Cuba. Lynch, then the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, allowed the bank to avoid prosecution in 2012 by paying a $1.9 billion fine and submitting to a monitor for five years to oversee compliance. Critics slammed the deal as an example of the Obama administration’s pattern of going easy on the financial industry. In the Dec. 11, 2012, interview she did with CBS News, Lynch endorsed the settlement and dismissed criticism of the deal as “shortsighted.”



Lynch’s boss at the time of the HSBC deal, Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, who was then head of the Department of Justice’s criminal prosecution division, resigned after a scathing Frontline piece that highlighted Justice’s failure to try any of the banks tied to the recession and the risky trades that led to it. It was during a discussion of HSBC before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Attorney General Holder famously said some banks — although not HSBC specifically — were too big to prosecute.

Well there you have it. This woman, like Eric Holder, will be an unmitigated disaster for freedom in America.

That’s what “liberal” looks like in today’s America.
 
Top