Palin's Position on Sex Education

FarmerJohn

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Palin appears to disagree with McCain on sex education

The Republican vice presidential candidate says students should be taught about condoms. Her running mate -- and the party platform -- disagree.

By Seema Mehta, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
September 6, 2008

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-sexed6-2008sep06,0,3119305.story

Teen pregnancy and sex education were thrust into the spotlight this week when Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin revealed that her 17-year-old daughter is five months pregnant.

Palin's running mate, John McCain, and the GOP platform say children should be taught that abstinence until marriage is the only safe way to avoid pregnancy and disease. Palin's position is less clear.

In a widely quoted 2006 survey she answered during her gubernatorial campaign, Palin said she supported abstinence-until-marriage programs. But weeks later, she proclaimed herself "pro-contraception" and said condoms ought to be discussed in schools alongside abstinence.

"I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues," she said during a debate in Juneau.

Such statements could raise concerns among social conservatives who have been some of Palin's most enthusiastic supporters since she was tapped for the No. 2 spot on the GOP ticket last week.

Leslee Unruh, president of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse and campaign manager of the Vote Yes for Life effort, said children must be given a "clear and concise" message on the benefits of abstinence.

Asked about Palin's statement, Unruh said, "I don't think it's clear. It seems disjointed to me."

Two days later, Unruh dismissed the comments as "old."

"I support her in every way," she said.

Other conservatives who have backed Palin, including James Dobson of Focus on the Family, declined to weigh in.

Palin spokeswoman Maria Comella said the governor stands by her 2006 statement, supporting sex education that covers both abstinence and contraception.

McCain's campaign did not respond to questions about whether Palin's position is inconsistent with his. But earlier, a campaign spokesperson said McCain believes abstinence is "the only safe and responsible alternative."

"To do otherwise is to send a mixed signal to children that, on the one hand they should not be sexually active, but on the other, here is the way to go about it," according to a statement provided by the campaign. "As any parent knows, ambiguity and equivocation leads to problems when it comes to teaching children right from wrong."

Even before Palin released a statement about her daughter Bristol, teen pregnancy had been in the spotlight frequently this year. The teen birth rate, which had been declining for 15 years, showed an increase in new data released in July. One month earlier, 17-year-old actress Jamie Lynn Spears gave birth to a daughter, distressing parents who worried about the message it would send to young fans. And early in the year, the film "Juno" won an Oscar, prompting critics to accuse Hollywood of glamorizing teen pregnancy.

Sex education varies widely across the nation's school districts.

In California, the state Education Code does not allow abstinence-only programs in public schools, so if a school offers sex education, it must include discussion of contraception as well as abstinence. About 96% of the state's schools offer sex education. All schools are required to educate older children about HIV/AIDS, and those discussions must cite both abstinence and condoms as methods of preventing infection.

The federal government has spent more than $1 billion on the abstinence-only message since 1996 under a program created by Congress as part of welfare reform. California is the only state to have declined to take part in the program since its inception. In recent years, states that had taken part in the program have decided to forgo the funding and the restrictions that come with it.

Palin's statements date to her 2006 gubernatorial run. In July of that year, she completed a candidate questionnaire that asked, would she support funding for abstinence-until-marriage programs instead of "explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?"

Palin wrote, "Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support."

But in August of that year, Palin was asked during a KTOO radio debate if "explicit" programs include those that discuss condoms. Palin said no and called discussions of condoms "relatively benign."

"Explicit means explicit," she said. "No, I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I am not anti-contraception. But, yeah, abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don't have a problem with that. That doesn't scare me, so it's something I would support also."
 

NC Susan

Deceased
DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR CHILDREN ARE?

Pregnant at 17 is not the end of the story.
Abortion at 17 is.


Any American born after 1972 was his mothers "CHOICE"

a choice between abortion or adoption or marriage or social welfare programs or abandonment to other family members
 

Dornroeschen

Inactive
PALIN BACKED ABSTINENCE-ONLY EDUCATION
Posted: Monday, September 01, 2008 1:27 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: 2008, Palin
From NBC's Katie Primm and Mark Murray
By the way, as has been pointed out, Palin backed abstinence-only education during her 2006 gubernatorial race. In an Eagle Forum Alaska questionnaire, Palin gave this response to the following question:

Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?

Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.

*** UPDATE *** NBC's Abby Livingston adds that a McCain spokesperson in May 2007 said the Arizona Republican supported abstinence-only education, too. "Sen. McCain believes the correct policy for educating young children on this subject is to promote abstinence as the only safe and responsible alternative. To do otherwise is to send a mixed signal to children that, on the one hand they should not be sexually active, but on the other here is the way to go about it. As any parent knows, ambiguity and equivocation leads to problems when it comes to teaching children right from wrong. Sen. McCain believes that there are many negative forces in today’s society that promote irresponsible and dangerous behavior to our children. The public education system should not join this chorus of moral equivocation and ambiguity.”

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/01/1320417.aspx
 

Nuthatch

Membership Revoked
Dorn. You beat me to it. I knew I saw it somewhere.

There was a recent study that reported abstinence-only education actually increases STDs and birth rates. I'm sure its already posted here somewhere.
 

fruit loop

Inactive
Most kids in my state are already having sex before "abstinence only sex ed" is even mentioned in school. The state's pregnancy rate skyrocketed after this program was instituted.
 

fruit loop

Inactive
I agree that sex should be discussed at home....but it isn't always. It was NEVER mentioned in the adopter's home. Actually puberty wasn't either. I got information from friends, and usually it was wrong information.

Unfortunately a lot of parents fail in their duty as parents.
 

kozanne

Inactive
So she backed abstinence only education. So what. I thought the STATES decided that kind of thing, CA apparently did.

Don't worry libbies. Much unlike your dream of a nanny state that forces people to do what you want them to do under penalty of law, abstinence only education cannot be forced. If you don't like what your state enforces, then homeschool your children.
 

fruit loop

Inactive
If you don't like what your state enforces, then homeschool your children

Homeschool your kids anyway. They usually get a better education.
 

Christian for Israel

Knight of Jerusalem
contraceptive use and abstinence only until marriage do not necessarily conflict. consider how many married couples use contraceptives to limit the number of children they have.

teaching children to wait until marriage while also instructing them in the proper use of contraceptives for AFTER they are married makes good sense.
 

Wadi66

Inactive
When my kids were of the age to receive sex education in the schools, only one line of thought was taught.... protection. Narry a mention of abstaining, zip, zero, nadda. Give equal time to both or not at all. Understand that when the sex ed was first introduced there was an underlying intent to de-sanctify conception to offset the moral repugnancy of abortion.
 

Emcomus

<~Knights of Malta
Exactly, this isn't a fed issue...or at least it shouldn't be.

Monty

It ONLY becomes a Federal Issue, when kids on public assistance (my tax dollars) become involved in supporting forms of birth control...like in the case of abortion.
 

fruit loop

Inactive
Birth control prevents abortions.

Condoms help prevent the spread of HIV and herpes.

But it's still taboo to talk about them.
 

FarmerJohn

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I started this thread by posting the article which indicated that Palin did support the teaching contraceptive methods (in a non-explicit manner) along with touting the benefit of abstinence. If that article is correct then I feel that I owe her an apology.

Dornroeschen posted:

PALIN BACKED ABSTINENCE-ONLY EDUCATION
Posted: Monday, September 01, 2008 1:27 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: 2008, Palin
From NBC's Katie Primm and Mark Murray
By the way, as has been pointed out, Palin backed abstinence-only education during her 2006 gubernatorial race. In an Eagle Forum Alaska questionnaire, Palin gave this response to the following question:

Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?

Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.

It seems that if I need to apologise to Palin then she was dodging the Eagle Forum question by giving the answer that they wanted to hear. "Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support." Her support of non-explicit contraception education is fully compatible with her answer. If Alaskans have had the benefit of that contraception education then we shouldn't be faulting her for keeping her daughter ignorant.

FJ
 
Top