FASCISM Obama suggests 'digital fingerprints' to counter misinformation 'so we know what's true and what's not true'

StarryEyedLad

désespéré pour le ciel
BARACK OBAMA Published June 16, 2023 2:57pm EDT

Obama suggests 'digital fingerprints' to counter misinformation 'so we know what's true and what's not true'​

Obama says he's been target of 'deepfakes,' predicts next election cycle will be rife with false info
By Aaron Kliegman | Fox News

Former President Barack Obama suggested in a new interview the development of "digital fingerprints" to combat misinformation and distinguish between true and misleading news for consumers.

Obama sat down with his former White House senior adviser David Axelrod for a conversation on the latter's podcast, "The Axe Files," on CNN Audio. During the interview, Axelrod noted he's seen "misinformation, disinformation, [and] deepfakes" targeting Obama.

"As I've told people, because I was the first digital president when I left office, I was probably the most recorded, filmed, photographed human in history, which is kind of a weird thing," responded Obama. "But just the odds are that I was. As a consequence, there's a lot of raw material there."

The former president added that the deepfakes — digitally manipulated images, audio or video that appear legitimate — started with a version of him dancing, "saying dirty limericks" and similar kinds of activity.

"That technology's here now," continued Obama, who warned about the issue getting worse moving forward. "So, most immediately we're going to have all the problems we had with misinformation before, [but] this next election cycle will be worse."

He then suggested "digital fingerprints" to discern truth from misinformation.

"And the need for us, for the general public, I think to be more discriminating consumers of news and information, the need for us to over time develop technologies to create watermarks or digital fingerprints so we know what is true and what is not true," he said. "There's a whole bunch of work that's going to have to be done there, but in the short term, it's really going to be up to the American people to kind of say."

Obama and Axelrod went on to say that today many consumers are only viewing information from sources they are predisposed to agree with and will likely believe what they see.

"Obviously, we saw that during the vaccination stuff. So, I am concerned about it," added Obama, referring to the COVID vaccine. "And I think the best we're going to be able to do is to constantly remind people that this is out there."

The former president said he thinks most people are now aware that "not everything that pops up on your phone is true," but cautioned misinformation can be used to discourage people from voting by characterizing the system as rigged and corrupt.

"That can oftentimes advantage the powerful," said Obama. "And I am worried about that kind of cynicism developing even further during the course of this next election."

The interview came about six weeks after the Obama Foundation on World Press Freedom Day posted a recent video of the former president lecturing about "widespread disinformation" and the need for journalists to create "an information environment" to support democracy.

Last year, Obama announced that his foundation would be launching a new initiative to combat misinformation. Days later, Obama angered conservatives with a speech at Stanford University warning of the dangers of "disinformation."

During the speech, Obama said, "All we see is a constant feed of content where useful factual information and happy diversions, and cat videos flow alongside lies, conspiracy theories, junk science, quackery, White supremacist, racist tracts, misogynist screeds."

Critics were quick to point out that Obama promoted the debunked narrative that former President Donald Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election and that Obama infamously won Politifact's "Lie of the Year" in 2013 by telling Americans, "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," referring to the Affordable Care Act.

More recently, the Biden administration came under fire for trying to start the now-defunct Disinformation Governance Board under the Department of Homeland Security. Many Republicans argued such an initiative would act as a Ministry of Truth in a dystopian society by suppressing dissent under the guise of stopping misinformation.

 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Need to give the "Office of Disinformation" something to work with - and someone to suppress.

"We're sorry. Your ISP has been disallowed by the OOD. Please lodge your complaint with the resolution office and your case will be considered in the order in which it was received."

Dobbin
 

Nich1

Veteran Member
"It's time to turn the tables and label what "they" say as misinformation. As smokin questioned above, "Who gets to determine which info is true?" "They" have found two words to use continually that always puts them in the clear...those words are: racist and misinformation. Whenever those are used, it is obvious that the left has been exposed. Keep the antennae up. When you hear that something is racist or misinformation, you'll know that the real truth i in there.
 

raven

TB Fanatic
Fingers are digits.
Therefore all fingerprints are digital.
Everyone has them.
They have never proved trustworthiness.
Case in point, don't they fingerprint persons arrested for crime?
It seems a digital fingerprint would prove untrustworthiness.
 

bassgirl

Veteran Member
So he is telling us that the next election will be full of lies, but don’t believe the truths because those are lies and fingerprint picture on line will prove it.
Means get ready it’s about to be a real whopper of a year.
 

Night Owl

Veteran Member
If you arrive in this country from anywhere overseas you have to give your passport & put your thumb or index finger on a laser scanner when going through immigration. Sorry don’t remember, Philippines, Hong Kong and U.S. all uses this laser scanner to verify or collect for some government department and each uses different fingers. So they have fingerprint.

they also have your finger prints when you have a concealed permit.
 

Sacajawea

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Memo to Obama:

EVERYONE has their OWN truth. If you say there is only one - that leaves out all your protected identity groups. Dummy.
 

workhorse

Veteran Member
So are they going to let us know when it’s a government plant or under cover person. How about when it’s a governmental bot spreading misinformation? No I think not. When one controls what truth is only what they say will be the truth even if it is a bald face lie.
 

Kris Gandillon

The Other Curmudgeon
_______________
The “digital fingerprint” being referred to in the OP is not a digital version of a real FINGER print.

It is a “fingerprint” (unique identifier) made up of several specific details of a known original digital picture, video, music clip, document or whatever that can then be used to detect a version of the original and declare it does indeed match the original OR detect that it is an altered (edited, faked) version of the original (like the audio has been altered to say something different than the original, for example).

Digital fingerprinting can and is also used to identify you and the devices you use while online. Things such as your cpu, your browser, and other specific characteristics of your computer, phone, tablet, etc are combined in a similar fashion to make you uniquely identifiable even across your various devices.

So, in effect, combining the two types of digital fingerprinting they hope to be able to then tell WHO altered the original item in question (picture, video/audio clip, etc.) OR ensure the item in question is truly the unaltered original created by the original entity that created it.

Here is a pretty good link if you are interested in diving a little deeper into digital fingerprinting:

 
Last edited:
Top