POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

[marsh]

AG Garland Says He's "Not Aware" Zuckerberg Poured Over $400 Million To Interfere In The 2020 Presidential Election And Takeover Polling Places | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

US Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday testified before the House Judiciary Committee on the Justice Department’s mission and policies.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

AG Garland Says He’s “Not Aware” Zuckerberg Poured Over $400 Million To Interfere In The 2020 Presidential Election And Takeover Polling Places

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 21, 2021 at 5:14pm

US Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday testified before the House Judiciary Committee on the Justice Department’s mission and policies.

Prior to the 2020 election, Zuckerburg dumped over $400 million to hijack the elections nationwide. Arizona received nearly $3 million Zuckerbucks to run their election and Georgia received nearly $5.6 million Zuckerbucks.

Garland defended the 2020 election and even threatened states who thought about auditing their elections.

BREAKING: Biden DOJ Steps In - Issues Guidelines Cautioning States Performing Audits of Election Results | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Unreal!

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Garland’s wife is an election specialist with connections to non-profits attempting to prevent any election audits of the 2020 Presidential Election and Ms. Garland co-wrote an article with the Brennan Center and Verified Voting.

She knows all about the nonprofits, CTCL, and Mark Zuckerburg’s generous “donation”.

“I’m not aware of what you’re talking about.”
Ridiculous!
Garland claims he has no idea that Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg poured over $400 million to interfere in the 2020 presidential election and takeover polling places

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451240129012674560

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1451240129012674560
.41 min

 

[marsh]

Robert Mueller Investigated For Staging Alleged Militia Hoax Now Used To Prosecute Jan 6 Defendant

The FBI under former director Robert Mueller stands accused of staging a hoax in Madisonville, Tennessee in 2010 to falsely entrap a man on a rare gun charge — and that case is now used as precedent to prosecute a January 6 protester on the same rare gun charge. Evidence provided to National...

nationalfile.com

Robert Mueller Investigated For Staging Alleged Militia Hoax Now Used To Prosecute Jan 6 Defendant

The Feds Are Out of Control

by PATRICK HOWLEY
October 20, 2021



The FBI under former director Robert Mueller stands accused of staging a hoax in Madisonville, Tennessee in 2010 to falsely entrap a man on a rare gun charge — and that case is now used as precedent to prosecute a January 6 protester on the same rare gun charge.

Evidence provided to National File suggests that Mueller’s FBI completely invented the details of a supposed militia attempt to take over a courthouse, framing a man named Darren Wesley Huff. One of Mueller’s top deputies is alleged to have provided a false statement that contradicts numerous other sworn statements and evidence in the case.

The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation (TBI) opened an investigation into Mueller’s conduct, according to documented evidence presented below and in audio recordings obtained by NATIONAL FILE in which a witness in the case speaks to TBI investigators. Mueller’s FBI coordinated on the takedown of Huff with the left-wing “Fogbow” activist organization led by a leftist named PJ Foggy, who wears a hammer and sickle hat, according to PJ Foggy’s admissions.

PJ Foggy of TheFogBow Blog, pictured wearing his hammer and sickle hat

Guy Reffitt has been charged under the firearm provision of the rioting statute, stemming from the January 6 Election Integrity protest in Washington, D.C. in which Capitol Police allowed pro-Trump demonstrators to peacefully enter the Capitol building.

Prosecutors claim that Reffitt transported two guns, an AR-15 and a Smith & Wesson, to Washington, D.C., even though Reffitt’s lawyer argues that there’s no evidence whatsoever that Reffitt was armed at the Capitol.

It’s the latest charge against Reffitt, after he pleaded not guilty to three other charges. It’s a charge that has very concerning implications for the justice system going forward, since people can now be charged with a crime simply for having firearms if the government thinks they are going to a protest. And it’s a charge that insiders believe is propped up by a hoax.

The Washington Post reported on Reffitt and the federal rioting statute, noting that the precedent used to prosecute Reffitt is based on the case of another man named Darren Wesley Huff.

The Washington Post reported: “In 2015, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit upheld the law, saying the statute does not criminalize speech or any protected rights. ‘Unlawful conduct is not protected conduct,’ a three-judge panel ruled, upholding the 2011 conviction at trial of Darren Wesley Huff, a former Georgia militia member found guilty of bringing an AK-47 rife, Colt .45-caliber handgun and 300 rounds of ammunition and trying to rally others to take over a Monroe Co. (Tenn.) courthouse after a grand jury wouldn’t charge President Barack Obama with treason.” (Washington Post passage concludes).

But there’s a big problem with that precedent. It turns out, according to massive evidence including eyewitness sworn affidavits and photographic evidence provided to this outlet, Darren Wesley Huff never actually tried to take over the courthouse in Tennessee, and Robert Mueller’s FBI allegedly fabricated the case.

“The DOJ / FBI are using a DOJ / FBI manufactured domestic terrorist hoax gun charge conviction as precedent to target Mr. Guy Reffitt for prosecution on a gun charge regarding Mr. Reffitt’s attendance at the U.S. Capitol rally on 6 January 2021,” Walter Fitzpatrick, a witness in the Huff case, tells NATIONAL FILE.

“The federal precedent results from the DOJ / FBI targeting Mr. Darren Wesley Huff in 2010 accusing Navy Veteran Huff of traveling from Georgia to Tennessee on 20 April 2010 to a trailer park courthouse in Madisonville, Tennessee. The federal accusation accuses of traveling across state lines with guns with intent to riot. It’s all an FBI manufactured hoax. Mr. Huff was never at the courthouse. The 12 or so other men Van Balen talks about are ghosts. No one at the courthouse on 20 April 2010 was armed, saving for law enforcement officials,” Walter Fitzpatrick said, noting that a sheriff’s deputy told him that the entire exercise was good for “training.”

At the time, Fitzpatrick was calling for then-President Barack Obama to be investigated. He was accused of attempting to make citizens arrests of local officials who refused to investigate Obama, prompting Huff and others to come to his defense in Madisonville. Huff was ultimately convicted of one count and acquitted of another, though the jury initially came back hung.

“The FBI under Mueller declared his anticipated activity on 20 April 2010 a federal police emergency. Their law enforcement presence is the stuff of legend around East Tennessee. Hundreds of officers, many in camo, snipers on roofs and in windows, roadblocks into and out of Madisonville, helos (plural) airborne, pixelated pole cameras,” Walter Fitzpatrick said.

An Oath Keeper has footage of the traffic stop of Darren Wesley Huff, who never actually went to the courthouse.

View: https://youtu.be/eukvd_x3Id4
4:01 min

No one was arrested on the date in question. Huff was arrested 10 days later on April 30 after he was pulled over on Interstate 35 based on a warrant stemming from a federal affidavit from Mueller henchman Mark Van Balen that witnesses claim is fabricated. Van Balen’s affidavit is dated April 26, six days after the protest.

A photo of the crowd of protesters outside the courthouse that day shows women and children, and clearly shows that Huff did not lead a band of 12 armed men to take over the courthouse. Huff is not in the photograph because he was not at the courthouse. In fact, Darren Wesley Huff was at a restaurant during the peaceful protest.

The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation opened an “investigative case file” on Mueller’s conduct, according to the 2018 document presented below. Fitzpatrick spoke with TBI investigators about the case, as documented on audio recordings.



Mark Van Balen’s affidavit stated, allegedly falsely:

SWORN AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM R. LOOMAN, former Sergeant of the Marines, drill instructor at Paris Island, he traveled with Darren Huff that day on April 20 from Georgia, never left his sight or his side:

2013 SWORN AFFIDAVIT FROM JOHN IVENS: “To Whom It May Concern: On 20 April 2010, I did attend a hearing for arraignment of Walter Fitzpatrick in Madisonville, Tennessee. I was one who had to stay outside and await the outcome of the arraignment. All around me were law officers and only a few others, like myself, awaiting the outcome. During this time, I heard no derogatory comments about the government or anyone involved in this situation that would have caused alarm in anyone. I, myself, had no weapon, neither did I observe anyone else other than officers with weapons. No threatenings [sic] were made toward anyone. I had coffee with Mr. Fitzpatrick and Mr. Huff in Donna’s cafe along with 8-10 others who had showed up for the hearing during a break.

I heard nothing threatening out of either and none of us were armed. The only conversation was as you would imagine given the circumstances but nothing harmful to anyone. Later I had FBI appear at my door, I guess from obtaining tag numbers while we were there, asking me about my trip and why I was there?

They seemed to have the impression that I and members of the group were armed. I informed that that was a lie. I did feel they were invading my privacy and right to go where I wanted when I wanted and asked them to leave which they did. I have heard about Mr. Fitzpatrick’s situation since that time and feel this is a travesty against all we have been taught and believe about our government. It should never have happened but I have not heard any threats against anyone regarding this situation.

I am a U.S. citizen and former military also an Oath Keeper who feels that this was my right and duty to attend this meeting. I was unarmed and did no harm to anyone, just a bystander and a coffee drinker. These were my rights and I feel I was well protected by the outrageous number of law enforcement that day who were using our tax dollars.”

PJ FOGGY SPILLLS THE BEANS: PJ Foggy, a blogger who wears a hammer and sickle hat and is part of the leftist “FOGBOW” network stated, “We’re the ones who got more than 100 cops ready for Cdr. Walt Fitzpatrick, when he showed up on April 20 with a group of armed men who thought they’d take over the Monroe County courthouse.”

Here are is a photo of PJ Foggy followed by his admission that he played a role in what insiders believe was a Mueller hoax:

 

[Dobbin]

Oh, wait....I remember now. You're Birthers. That means you have to label your shoes "right" and "left" so you can remember from day to day how to put them on.

Actually, the challenge is greater than that by 2 - forward - back.

So the challenge is gotten past by the use of nails.

And Obama was a non-American - and shouldn't have been President. Only that "Deep State" wanted it. And Dominion had just started being used in 2008. And was NECESSARY to elect Obama a second time in 2012.

I suspect me and PJ would not "get along."

Dobbin

 

[marsh]

NEW: Arizona AG Mark Brnovich Sends Out Letter: "States Can And Should Take Every Opportunity To Reassure All Citizens That Their Vote Counts" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Yesterday, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich released a letter to U.S.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

NEW: Arizona AG Mark Brnovich Sends Out Letter: “States Can And Should Take Every Opportunity To Reassure All Citizens That Their Vote Counts”

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 22, 2021 at 1:41pm

Yesterday, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich released a letter to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland standing up for election integrity and state sovereignty.

All evidence from the Arizona audit investigation has been presented to the Arizona Attorney General’s office and we have still seen no action.

Today marks three weeks since the truth was revealed to the world on September 24th and Mark Brnovich has given us nothing but letters and nunchucks.

The evidence is cut and dry. Mark Brnovich even has photographs of the employees who deleted data on the Election Management Server and evidence of internet connectivity on the Election Management Server. These are just two violations of the law.

Yesterday, Mark Brnovich tweeted,

Today, U.S. Attorney General Garland is testifying before a U.S. House Committee.

Our office has made it crystal clear to AG Garland that we will defend federalism and state sovereignty against any partisan attacks or federal overreach.

States created the federal government.

Brnovich: Late last week, you made troubling comments about the ongoing efforts in states to ensure election integrity. Your statements displayed an alarming disdain for state sovereignty as defined under the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution and the election provisions in Articles I and II.

Your comments followed a May 5 letter from Pamela Kaelan of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, on the subject of the Arizona Senate’s oversight of the Maricopa County audit. This letter appeared more interested in supporting the hysterical outcries of leftist pundits on cable television, rather than the rule of law.

My office is not amused by the DOJ’s posturing and will not tolerate any effort to undermine or interfere with our State Senate’s audit to reassure Arizonans of the accuracy of our elections. We stand ready to defend federalism and state sovereignty against any partisan attacks or federal overreach.

It is important to remember that the states created the federal government, not the other way around. America’s founders intentionally restrained the federal government’s constitutional boundaries to ensure each state could flourish in unique ways. Today, our federal government has largely forgotten the Founders’ intent, but my office has not.

There are no issues more important for states to prioritize than the integrity of our elections. This is the cornerstone of our republic, binding together the peoples’ trust in the whole of government.

Today, we see mistrust in our elections from Americans on all sides of the political spectrum. This should not be a partisan issue.

States can and should take every opportunity to reassure all citizens that their vote counts.

My office looks for ways to work alongside the federal government to uphold our laws within the constraints of the 10th Amendment and the election provisions in Articles I and II. As I have demonstrated several times, however, Arizona will not sit back and let the Biden administration abuse its authority, refuse to uphold laws, or attempt to commandeer our state’s sovereignty.

Contact Arizona Attorney General Brnovich now and demand a full criminal investigation of the Arizona 2020 election with arrests.

Contact Brnovich HERE.

Contact AG Mark Brnovich

 

[marsh]

KLINE: Zuck's Bucks were ILLEGAL. - The National Pulse

Recent reporting on the influence of private funding of public elections by Mark Zuckerberg is long overdue and greatly appreciated by those of us who have been sounding the alarm about this for over a year. There’s more to the story, however, and the American people need to know the full...

thenationalpulse.com

by Phil Kline

October 21, 2021

Recent reporting on the influence of private funding of public elections by Mark Zuckerberg is long overdue and greatly appreciated by those of us who have been sounding the alarm about this for over a year. There’s more to the story, however, and the American people need to know the full truth.

The New York Post‘s front-page package of articles and op-eds did an admirable job of covering the scandal, bringing much-needed attention to an issue that many Americans knew little about, even though it was arguably the decisive factor in the 2020 presidential election.

The Amistad Project filed the first litigation seeking to block private funding of elections in September 2020, based on investigations that began months earlier.

We have continued and expanded our investigate-and-litigate strategy ever since, with a particular focus on the swing states that ultimately decided the outcome of the election.

What we have uncovered through litigation, discovery, open records requests, and witness interviews is deeply disturbing. In addition to over $400 million from Zuckerberg, The Amistad Project has identified hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of additional contributions in the form of talent, information, and monies from leftist individuals and nonprofits. All told, the real total easily exceeds $1 billion.

As numerous reports have correctly pointed out, there were not explicit laws on the books forbidding the infusion of private monies into public election offices, primarily because such a scheme had never been attempted or anticipated prior to 2020. There are, however, longstanding laws that apply to the broader contours of the left’s election meddling operation, because efforts to interfere with free and fair elections to produce a desired outcome are as old as democracy itself.

For instance, if it can be proven that leftist organizations gave money to public officials with the intent of achieving a partisan electoral advantage, then those contributions are a direct violation of campaign finance law.

In addition, conspiracy to deprive “any person or any class of persons of the equal protection of the laws” is a violation of longstanding civil rights laws.

Zuckerberg-funded grants from the Center for Tech and Civic Life heavily favored Democrat-leaning cities and counties, resulting in massive discrepancies in per-capita election funding between the urban core of major battleground states and the rest of those states. The conditions imposed as part of those grants further disadvantaged voters in less urban areas, for example by making it easier for urban voters to have flawed ballots “cured” by officials paid with Zuckerberg money. Moreover, as reported by Mollie Hemingway, these private interests actively worked to eviscerate state election integrity laws allowing for massive breaches in the chain of custody of the ballots in the urban core.

Voters in Zuckerberg-funded jurisdictions also benefited disproportionately from access to conveniences such as absentee ballot drop boxes – in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, one drop box was placed every four square miles and for every 4,000 voters; in the 59 counties carried by Trump in 2016, there was one drop box for every 1,100 square miles and every 72,000 voters.

And this disparate impact was the result of a conspiracy.

The plan was outlined months in advance by David Plouffe, Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign manager who later served as a senior political advisor to the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative. In his book,A Citizen’s Guide to Beating Donald Trump, Plouffe predicted that the 2020 general election would come down to a “block by block street fight” to turn out the vote in the urban core, especially cities such as Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia. Not long after that book came out, Plouffe’s previous employer, the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative, began pouring staggering amounts of money – $350 million – into CTCL, which proceeded to use it to turn out left-leaning voters in cities such as Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia.

Prior to 2020, CTCL’s annual revenues never exceeded $1.2 million. But it had all the right connections – leaders such as Tiana Epps-Johnson and Whitney May, who are veterans of the George Soros-funded New Organizing Institute. And CTCL represents just one of scores of leftist nonprofits interfering with the 2020 election.

The Amistad Project is still fighting to hold Mark Zuckerberg, CTCL, and the other key players in this conspiracy accountable. In the coming days, for instance, we will be issuing demands as part of our civil litigation, and will continue consulting those with subpoena power, to demand the production of communications Zuckerberg and other substantial players and billionaires had with leftist nonprofits pertaining to the 2020 election.

Leftist election officials in the urban core of the swing states kicked America out of the counting room and invited billionaires in during the 2020 election.

Elections must be transparent to be fair, and America deserves to see the records reflecting how these private interests funded by left-leaning billionaires managed the election.

When those communications are public, it will be clear that the left did far more than just corrupt our elections – they were actively working to turn government offices, which must act objectively, into campaign turn-out-the-vote centers for the Biden campaign.

 

[marsh]

Brian Kemp's Lackey and GBI Director Vic Reynolds Leaked Private Info of Brave Election Integrity Activists to Liberal Media - True the Vote Threatens Legal Action | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In September radio host John Fredericks joined Steve Bannon to discuss an EXPLOSIVE development in Georgia.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Brian Kemp’s Lackey and GBI Director Vic Reynolds Leaked Private Info of Brave Election Integrity Activists to Liberal Media – True the Vote Threatens Legal Action

By Jim Hoft
Published October 22, 2021 at 8:39pm

In September radio host John Fredericks joined Steve Bannon to discuss an EXPLOSIVE development in Georgia.

According to John Fredericks, investigators have video of 240 leftist operatives he called “ballot traffickers” dumping tens of thousands of ballots into drop boxes in the middle of the night in locations across Georgia.

The leftist operatives were identified making numerous drops in the middle of the night. They were filmed emptying their backpacks of ballots into the drop boxes in the middle of the night. Ballot harvesting is not legal in Georgia. This was criminal behavior caught on video!

True the Vote and OPSEC Group have copies of the video and are promising to release it in the near future.

This was a massive organized effort by the American left to commit fraud.

Catherine Engelbrecht and True the Vote are behind this investigation and we were told it involves SEVERAL BATTLEGROUND STATES and will soon go public.

Investigative journalist Heather Mullins released a photo of one of the late-night ballot traffickers in Georgia.

On Thursday Vic Reynolds, (pictured above) the Director of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation who was appointed by Governor Brian Kemp, wrote a letter to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution saying his organization has not found enough evidence to pursue claims by True the Vote of ballot
harvesting in the 2020 elections. Reynolds also leaked private information shared with him by True the Vote.

The Bozeman Daily Chronicle reported:

The head of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation told the state GOP chairman that there’s not enough evidence to pursue unsubstantiated claims of ballot harvesting in the 2020 elections based on cellphone signals collected by a conservative organization.

GBI Director Vic Reynolds wrote in a letter obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Thursday that GPS signals alone, without any witnesses or perpetrators, fall short of meriting a fresh law enforcement inquiry.

“Based on what has been provided and what has not been provided, an investigation is not justified,” Reynolds wrote.

It’s the latest in a string of setbacks to allies of former President Donald Trump who have leveled false accusations of widespread voting fraud while seeking to overturn his narrow November election defeat in Georgia.

Reynolds’ letter to Texas-based True the Vote and Georgia GOP Chairman David Shafer came in response to their allegations that GPS data identified 279 cellphones that had made multiple trips to within 100 feet of ballot drop boxes between Oct. 1 and Jan. 5.

Georgia law prohibits ballot collections in which organizations collect and mail absentee ballots on behalf of voters. Only voters themselves or their relatives are allowed to handle their ballots.

“What has not been provided is any other kind of evidence that ties these cellphones to ballot harvesting,” Reynolds wrote in the Sept. 30 letter. “As it exists, the data, while curious, does not rise to the level of probable cause that a crime has been committed.”

On Friday True the Vote sent a letter from their attorney on the report by the GBI Director to Governor Brian Kemp.

Vic Reynolds did not include recent data collected by True the Vote including video evidence in his latest investigation. Who is he protecting?

Vic Reynolds also leaked private information and the identities of activists to the liberal media despite his assurance that this would not happen.

True the Vote responded on Friday with a letter from their attorneys. They told him to keep all of his documents. They are threatening action.

We reached out to Catherine Engelbrecht and she had “no response” on this week’s developments.

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin election audit details numerous problems with the 2020 election process

The auditors provided 30 recommendations for areas of improvement for the Wisconsin Election Commission while identifying 18 items for the legislature to address.

justthenews.com

Wisconsin election audit details numerous problems with the 2020 election process

The auditors provided 30 recommendations for areas of improvement for the Wisconsin Election Commission while identifying 18 items for the legislature to address.
Updated: October 22, 2021 - 7:13pm

Wisconsin's Legislative Audit Bureau released its audit of the 2020 presidential election Friday, detailing numerous problems and issues it found with how the election was administered.

The nonpartisan panel reviewed election data from hundreds of cities and municipalities across Wisconsin, as well as written complaints concerning the General Election.

According to the report, the review board is recommending dozens of changes to how the state runs elections, as well as advocating for certain election laws to be adopted or revised.

One of the major concerns described within the report was the "inconsistent administration" of election law by officials across the state. The auditors recommended that more advanced training should be required for people wanting to serve as election officials.

The use of ballot drop boxes was also an issue of contention among the panel, with members suggesting the state needs to adopt a set of "uniform rules" regarding drop boxes, and not leave the decision up to county or city officials.

Although the report does extensively detail ways in which the state can improve election administration, it did not find any evidence of widespread voter fraud.

"Despite concerns with statewide elections procedures, this audit showed us that the election was largely safe and secure," said the panel's co-chair, Republican state Sen. Robert Cowles. "It's my hope that we can now look at election law changes & agency accountability measures in a bipartisan manner based on these nonpartisan recommendations."



The auditors provided 30 recommendations for areas of improvement for the Wisconsin Election Commission while identifying 18 items for the legislature to address.

 

[marsh]

PROVEN SYSTEMIC ELECTION FRAUD IN NM! 40:28 min

PROVEN SYSTEMIC ELECTION FRAUD IN NM!
MaharaCAT Published October 22, 2021
Listen to Erin Clements describe some of the sordid details of her and her teams findings resulting from months of hard work digging in to the details of what actually happened in NM on 11/3/20. Our election process was and still is a travesty and we must now take action based on these findings to get accountability and justice. Erin describes exactly what we must do now to save our State and our country.
Everything you need to know to TAKE ACTION starting the week of 10/24:
The New Mexico Election Fraud Report

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin Election Group Findings: 44,272 Voted WITHOUT Proof Of ID - While Margin Of Victory Only About 20,000 | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Wisconsin election investigation found the number of resident who voted without proof of ID more than doubles the margin of victory in the state.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wisconsin Election Group Findings: 44,272 Voted WITHOUT Proof Of ID – While Margin Of Victory Only About 20,000

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 23, 2021 at 6:50am


The Wisconsin election investigation found the number of resident who voted without proof of ID more than doubles the margin of victory in the state.

On Election night 2020, more than 100,000 ballots were dropped for Joe Biden in the middle of the night. This has still not been explained by authorities — ever.

WOW! — The Steal Is On!… With Last Night’s Ballot Dump Wisconsin has 88% Voter Turnout or HIGHER! IT’S EITHER AN IMPOSSIBLE NEW RECORD OR IT’S HORSESH*T

OANN’s Christina Bobb has been covering the story in Wisconsin extensively and today she reported this,

Wisconsin audit findings:

44,272 individuals voted without proof of ID. The margin of victory in on 20,000

Wisconsin audit findings:
44,272 individuals voted without proof of ID. The margin of victory in on 20,000
— Christina Bobb (@christina_bobb) October 22, 2021

Wisconsin election activist Matt Batzel shared his take on the audit report.

“Audit” was done by bureaucrats at Legislative Audit Bureau pic.twitter.com/Umt1pvqIzZ
— Matt Batzel (@MattBatzel) October 22, 2021

“We found that WEC’s administrative rules for training municipal clerks have not been updated since June 2016 and contain outdated provisions.” !!
— Matt Batzel (@MattBatzel) October 22, 2021

Over 12,000 deceased individuals were left on voter rolls because clerks “made no determination” on their deaths. pic.twitter.com/cOCR3bS4Ds
— Matt Batzel (@MattBatzel) October 22, 2021

“We found that WEC did not comply with statutes that require it to obtain from DOT the signatures of individuals who register online to vote.”
— Matt Batzel (@MattBatzel) October 22, 2021

“Statutes do not permit or prohibit ballot drop boxes.
In March 2020, WEC’s staff issued written guidance indicating that municipal clerks can allow individuals to return absentee ballots to drop boxes” in violation of state law
— Matt Batzel (@MattBatzel) October 22, 2021

Read the full audit report here.

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin State Auditors Complete Election Audit - Due to Sampling, Lack of Auditor Expertise, and Technological Savvy - It's Grossly Inadequate - Exactly What Speaker Vos Wanted | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The people of Wisconsin deserve much more. The results of an audit by the state audit team in Wisconsin were released this week. As predicted, these results lack the comprehensive audit work needed to uncover the fraud in the state’s November 2020 Election. Wisconsin House Speaker Robin Vos...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wisconsin State Auditors Complete Election Audit – Due to Sampling, Lack of Auditor Expertise, and Technological Savvy – It’s Grossly Inadequate – Exactly What Speaker Vos Wanted

By Joe Hoft
Published October 23, 2021 at 9:15am

The people of Wisconsin deserve much more. The results of an audit by the state audit team in Wisconsin were released this week. As predicted, these results lack the comprehensive audit work needed to uncover the fraud in the state’s November 2020 Election.

Wisconsin House Speaker Robin Vos initiated numerous actions that showed he wasn’t really serious about getting to the bottom of the fraudulent results in Wisconsin.

One of these actions was to get the state auditors involved. Unfortunately, this exercise was lacking from the start. The state auditors lack the expertise that others focused on ballot reviews using AI have. The state also would likely sample their work, which is inadequate for election audits and bank audits as noted previously.

The state auditors’ results were released this week and the results were just as expected. Although the auditors performed good work, due to the nature and significance of the fraud in the 2020 Election in Wisconsin, their work is inadequate.

On page 6 of the introduction to the audit, the auditors summarize some of the work they performed. They note that they ‘analyzed’ data and reviewed 14,710 absentee ballots.

The problem is there were millions of absentee ballots counted in the election, a small sample will miss numerous cases of fraud. It’s like counting the $10 bills in a tellers drawer in a bank audit and saying the banks’ balance for all money in-house is accurate.

Here’s the audit report.

Scribd doc on website
Wisconsin State Auditor Report of 2020 Election by Jim Hoft on Scribd

Download this PDF

This result is exactly what we predicted and what Speaker Vos hoped for.

Vos doesn’t want the fraud that occurred in the state identified. He wants a stolen election and Joe Biden in the White House. Who’s he kidding.

(We’ll be following up with the items in the state’s audit that address the fraud in a separate post.)

 

[marsh]

In 2020 Election in Wisconsin 60,000 People Registered Whose Identities Didn't Match Corresponding State Identification | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The Wisconsin state auditors were tasked with performing an audit of the 2020 Election in the state. Although the audit work performed would never address all the issues and fraudulent activities that occurred in the 2020 Election due to the manner in which the audit was performed, the audit did...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

In 2020 Election in Wisconsin 60,000 People Registered Whose Identities Didn’t Match Corresponding State Identification

By Joe Hoft
Published October 23, 2021 at 10:45am

The Wisconsin state auditors were tasked with performing an audit of the 2020 Election in the state. Although the audit work performed would never address all the issues and fraudulent activities that occurred in the 2020 Election due to the manner in which the audit was performed, the audit did have some notable results.

We noted already the results of the 2020 audit performed by the Wisconsin state auditors and why Speaker Vos wanted this audit because he knew it would never address the thousands of fraudulent ballots counted in the state’s election results.

However, the state auditors did the best with what they had in time and experience and did have some shocking observations in their report. For one, they noted that nearly a million people registered to vote in the state in 2020 before the November election with most registering online. A shocking number when considering less than 3.3 million voted in the 2020 Election.

Of those who registered in 2020, more than 45,000 of these individuals’ information did not match the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) information on the same individuals. Another 13,800 individuals were not even matched with DOT data. That’s nearly 60,000 cases!

Here is the report. scribd doc on website

Wisconsin State Auditor Report of 2020 Election by Jim Hoft on Scribd

Download this PDF

Wisconsin’s election was given to Biden with only a 20,000 vote lead. Over 100,000 ballots for Biden only were dropped in the middle of th night in Milwaukee. This state never should have been certified for Biden. Speaker Vos knows it.

[COMMENT: But the RINOS were in on the steal and benefitted from it down-ticket.)

 

[marsh]

THE BIG STEAL: New Poll Busts Open Big Media Lie on Biden's Alleged 2020 Surprise Voting Bloc | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In 2020 President Trump won more votes than any sitting president in US history.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

THE BIG STEAL: New Poll Busts Open Big Media Lie on Biden’s Alleged 2020 Surprise Voting Bloc

By Jim Hoft
Published October 23, 2021 at 12:05pm

In 2020 President Trump won more votes than any sitting president in US history.

Trump increased his vote totals by 12 million votes in 2020 over 2016.

Biden got a record low number of counties in the United States by a supposed “winner” – only 16%.

But Trump improved in EVERY category.

** President Trump won more Hispanic votes.
** President Trump won more female votes.
** Trump won more black votes.
** President Trump won more gay votes.
** President Trump won more immigrant votes.

But somehow Democrat Joe Biden, who did not campaign and can barely string two sentences together, supposedly won 81 million votes.

The same guy who can’t get 20 people to come out and see him when he travels around the US.

So how did Joe do it? How did Democrats steal the 2020 election?

We now know Democrats used several means to score illegal votes in several states. We witnessed them counting ballots behind closed doors, bringing in endless piles of ballots days after the election, locking Republicans out of the counting rooms, pulling boxes of ballots out from under tables when all the observers were sent home, driving in vanloads of ballots in the early hours of the morning after Joe Biden fell far behind.

And now we have another clue on how they stole the election and who they stole their votes from.

Huffington Post today credited “low-income voters” with giving Joe Biden the win.

This is preposterous on its face since everyone knows Trump connected to working-class voters like no other president in the last 100 years.

But it does offer us a clue on the BIG steal.

Take a ride outside the city in any state and you STILL see Trump flags. Donald Trump had enormous appeal — more than any president in the last 100 years!
Everyone knows Trump won over the low-income and middle-income voters. After all, these voters saw their incomes increase by at least 10% during the Trump years!

And now we have more proof on how Democrats stole the vote.

A recent Quinnipiac poll shows Joe Biden floundering with voters without a college degree — who as a whole are working-class voters.

Nearly two-thirds of the voters who reject Joe Biden are without a college degree.

Joe Biden NEVER had these voters. The fact that the fake news is finally reporting that this voting bloc flocked to Biden is safe to say a complete lie.

Investigators need to look at this pool of voters and canvass their communities to discover the fraud.

It is clear these people NEVER supported Basement Biden.

God help us as we continue to reveal the greatest crime in American history.

 

[marsh]

The U.S. Government & The Third-Party Vendor Are One

A lawsuit in Colorado alleges that a private company currently trying to chill free speech in America is actually the government itself.

emeralddb3.substack.com

The U.S. Government & The Third-Party Vendor Are One

A lawsuit in Colorado alleges that a private company currently trying to chill free speech in America is actually the government itself.

Emerald Robinson Oct 22 53 4

Earlier this month, a rather extraordinary lawsuit was filed in Colorado on behalf of eight Michigan poll watchers against the most infamous third-party vendor in the world. [Dominion] (For the duration of this article, let’s call that overly litigious entity: Opinion Voting Systems or OVS.) The details contained in that lawsuit are striking for a number of reasons, and not the least of them is the “Lawfare” strategy that OVS employed to silence any criticism of the company.

(The entire lawsuit can be found here.) This “lawsuit warfare” campaign was so extensive that it (allegedly) chilled the free speech of regular Americans who volunteered as poll watchers and didn’t make any public statements about the company at all:

As part of this campaign, OVS publicly boasted, with the assistance of
Hamilton Place Strategies, LLC (“HPS”)—OVS’s Public Relations Firm—on its website and in interviews that its lawyers, Clare Locke, LLP (“Clare Locke”) sent letters to over 150 individuals demanding they cease and desist from “taking part in defaming OVS and to preserve all documents and communications that may be relevant to OVS’s [unspecified] pending claims” and threatened ruinous “imminent” litigation—even if the recipients of the letters did not make any public statements about OVS.

These were odd and intimidating letters. They informed people that the letter was “your formal notice to cease and desist taking part in defaming OVS and to preserve all documents and communications” without listing exactly where or how the person had “defamed” OVS in any way.

That’s not all. In these letters, OVS (and its lawyers) demanded that recipients “confirm receipt of this letter and that you intend to adhere to our request to retain documents” without providing any address or contact information to do so. The letters demanded the retraction of statements that were never identified.

They demanded the retention of documents that didn’t exist:

Said another way, the Letters were boilerplate directives meant to instill fear and intimidation. Despite failing to identify the alleged defamation, OVS then illegally demanded these private citizens preserve all communications, emails, texts—private or otherwise—and a host of other materials.

According to the lawyers who filed the suit against OVS, the letters were designed to stop ordinary Americans from talking about election security regardless of the validity of those claims:

For example, Plaintiffs are restricted—according to the Letters—from
speaking about a topic of major public concern: the largest cyber breach in U.S. history. In December 2020, the U.S. government announced it suffered the largest cyber breach in history through the Solar Winds hack. This breach demonstrates how vulnerable electronic voting systems are to hackers because those systems are, directlyor indirectly, connected to the internet. Despite the OVS CEO’s claims that OVS had never used SolarWinds, an archival screenshot of OVS’s website shows a now–erased SolarWinds logo. Based on this evidence, it appears that OVS did use SolarWinds software.

In other words, OVS was (allegedly) trying to suppress the American public from discussing election integrity in general. The “lawfare” letters sent out to these 150 people were merely one part of a much larger campaign to stop anyone from criticizing the results of the 2020 election:

Public debates, audits, and/or investigations of the 2020 General Election are currently being conducted or contemplated by state legislators in Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and other states to ascertain the scale of vulnerabilities and whether they were exploited. By widely publicizing its intimidation campaign, OVS and its co-conspirators seek to intimidate and silence not just Plaintiffs and the Class, but also the public at large from exercising their right to speak and to share their own testimonial evidence relevant to proceedings investigating election fraud in the November 2020 election.

Does this sound like the behavior of a third-party vendor to you? Have you ever heard of a private company waging war against the free speech of its customers?

Of course not. These things do not happen for obvious reasons. Lest you think that OVS is just a company with suicidal business practices, the lawsuit drops the most important and explosive allegation contained in any lawsuit filed in America:

OVS has not waged its Lawfare campaign as only a corporate citizen,
but also as a state–actor, i.e., the government. OVS is a state–actor because States across the United States have outsourced their constitutional obligation to run elections by deferring to OVS’s professional experience and contracting out the administration, collection, counting, recording, and auditing of ballot results through voting technology, software, and thousands of hours of technical and election services. For example, Georgia paid OVS roughly $90,000,000 for a complete, end–to–end election solution in their Master Solution contract. In the Master Solution, Georgia specifically stated “[t]he unique abilities, knowledge, and skills of [OVS] constitute a material inducement for State entering into this Agreement.” Such reliance and partnership between OVS and States, according to which OVS itself takes the place of the government, makes OVS’s conduct of elections and all its related activities a state-action. The administration, collection, counting, recording, and auditing of ballot results in elections are inherently a traditional, exclusive public function. So not only have these Americans received Letters from a corporate citizen with tens of millions in annual revenue and private equity support, but they have also been threatened by, in effect, the government itself.

Just read those key sentences again:

The supposedly third-party vendor which presents itself as a private company “is a state actor, i.e., the government.”

“These people have been threatened by, in effect, the government itself.”

That’s why a cyber security expert on stage at Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium said: "The question is: who's running our elections? I think the third-party vendor is running our elections. I think this has been happening for a long time."

That’s because the U.S. Government and the third-party vendor are one and the same. These people have been threatened by, in effect, the government itself.

 

[marsh]

It Turns Out Attorney General Merrick Garland's Wife Was Heavily Involved in Stopping Election Audits in 2020

"Merrick Garland's conflicts of interest quite apparently run deep; none more serious than his conflict of interest with the Constitution of the United States."

beckernews.com

It Turns Out Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Wife Was Heavily Involved in Stopping Election Audits in 2020

October 21, 2021
by Kyle Becker

Written by Kyle Becker

Attorney General Merrick Garland is the nation’s top law enforcement official. It is his duty to enforce the laws faithfully and without prejudice. However, the attorney general’s partisan agenda is made even more explicit when examining his family ties.

In 1987, the New York Times reported Merrick Garland’s marriage to Lynn Rosenman, who took the name Lynn Garland. She is the granddaughter of Samuel Rosenman, a judge at the New York Supreme Court who had served as Special Advisor to Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry Truman.

In the Times’ announcement, it provides the background that Lynn Garland worked for E-Systems, which specializes in electronic and information warfare.

Mrs. Garland, who graduated from the Brearley School and cum laude from Harvard University, received a Master of Science degree in operations management from the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She is a staff assistant to the vice president in charge of operations for the Melpar division of E-Systems Inc., a defense electronics contractor in Falls Church, Va. The bride’s father is a partner in the New York law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore.

E-Systems, a defense contractor based out of New Jersey, has quite the shadowy profile. This is how the Washington Post described the firm in 1994, when it still did actual journalism:

If Big Brother ever took control of the United States, E-Systems Inc. would surely be its prime contractor. Consider:

* E-Systems designs spy satellite gear that can snap photographs of automobile license plates from space and capture electronic communications, from phone calls to rocket telemetry.
* E-Systems software can analyze those spy satellite photos to see if anything has changed — a Russian tank moved or an Iraqi missile site built — since the last shots were taken.
* E-Systems can build “electronic fences” to police borders. It helped build one such network of sensors to monitor drug traffickers along the U.S. border with Mexico, and the company says it hopes to build a more sophisticated one for Saudi Arabia.
* And E-Systems hardware can help federal drug enforcement agencies track cocaine planes and tap drug dealers’ telephones.

“In short, E-Systems’ technologies, part of the central nervous system for the nation’s intelligence community, are regarded as brilliant by intelligence agencies and Wall Street,” WaPo added.

Lynn Garland would go on to work with the Election Verification Network, which describes itself as a network of professionals who consult on elections (she is listed as a member on the EVN website):

Just over a decade ago, a small group of election-related professionals concerned with the integrity and improvement of U.S. voting systems considered the potential of a gathering place for leaders, experts and policy makers…one where they could exchange information, collaborate on ideas, share challenges and solutions, and serve as a trusted advisory resource for those responsible for local, statewide, and national elections. Out of that concept, the Election Verification Network (EVN) was born. Our mission includes two interwoven goals: to support and maintain voting that is accessible, private, reliable, and secure; and elections that are transparent, accurate, and verifiable.

Garland is credited as a co-author for a number of election audit documents ranging from 2008 until 2019. Of particular interest is a document she co-authored with the Brennan Center for Justice, which became notorious for fighting against 2020 election audits. The November 27, 2019 document was described as “Verified Voting in consultation with Lynn Garland, Independent Advisor, and with the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law.”

Lynn Garland authored several other audit documents, which are provided below. This is Principles and Best Practices for Post-Election Tabulation Audits (2018).

Principles and Best Practices for Post-Election Tabulation Audits (Lynn Garland) by Kyle Becker on Scribd (Scribd doc on website)


Download this PDF

This is a 2008 document entitled Principles and Best Practices for Post-Election Audits that Garland helped author:

Principles and Best Practices for Post-Election Audits (Lynn Garland) by Kyle Becker on Scribd (Scribd doc on website)


Download this PDF

This is a 2019 guide for Rhode Island :
Pilot Implementation Study of Risk-Limiting Audit Methods (Lynn Garland) by Kyle Becker on Scribd (Scribd doc on website)



Download this PDF

“Several of the other individuals connected with the ‘Election Verification Network’ work with far-left ‘non-profits’ that worked to prevent audits of the results of the 2020 Election,” Gateway Pundit notes.

One of Merrick Garland’s most provocative actions as attorney general was to threaten Arizona over its independent audit. In June, Garland issued a stunningly partisan announcement about Arizona’s state election integrity efforts.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1403426447763685387

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1403426447763685387
.30 min

“We are scrutinizing new laws that seek to curb voter access and where we see violations we will not hesitate to act,” he said. “We are also scrutinizing current laws and practices in order to determine whether they discredit against black voters and other voters of color. Particularly concerning with in this regard are several studies showing that in some jurisdictions nonwhite voters must wait in line substantially longer than white voters to cast their ballots.”

Arizona’s Attorney General Mark Brnovich was compelled to respond to the U.S. Attorney General Garland over his office’s threats.

“My office is not amused by the DOJ’s posturing and will not tolerate any effort to undermine or interfere with the State Senate’s audit to reassure Arizonans of the accuracy of our elections,” the letter added. “We stand ready to defend federalism and state sovereignty against any partisan attacks or federal overreach.”

“It is important to remember that the states created the federal government, not the other way around,” it went on. “America’s founders intentionally restrained the federal government’s constitutional boundaries to ensure each state could flourish in unique ways. Today, our federal government has largely forgotten the Founders’ intent, but my office has not.”

Attorney General Garland has turned a blind eye to the actual infringement of Americans’ rights, such as those stemming from unlawful vaccine mandates. In addition, he has excused rioting by Black Lives Matter and Antifa while persecuting January 6 defendants, many of whom only face minor criminal charges like trespassing. Garland has threatened states that seek answers about what actually happened during the 2020 elections. Worst of all, he has unleashed the FBI on parents who oppose Critical Race Theory being taught in their children’s schools.

It should come as no surprise, then, that Merrick Garland’s wife was deeply involved in the 2020 election debacle, and his son-in-law is cashing in on American schools’ disgraceful Critical Race Theory agenda.

In many ways, Attorney General Merrick Garland has already surpassed his predecessors in terms of open partisanship and sheer corruption. Garland’s conflicts of interest quite apparently run deep; none more serious than his conflict of interest with the Constitution of the United States.

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin Had 89% Reported Turnout in 2020 Election -- Impossible Number that Still Can't Be Explained | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

On Election Night, early in the morning of November 4th, 2020, over 100,000 ballots were dropped for Joe Biden only. What happened in Wisconsin on Election Night when over 100,000 ballots were dropped for Joe Biden only, giving him the lead in the state over President Trump who led the race up...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wisconsin Had 89% Reported Turnout in 2020 Election — Impossible Number that Still Can’t Be Explained

By Joe Hoft
Published October 23, 2021 at 3:30pm

On Election Night, early in the morning of November 4th, 2020, over 100,000 ballots were dropped for Joe Biden only.

What happened in Wisconsin on Election Night when over 100,000 ballots were dropped for Joe Biden only, giving him the lead in the state over President Trump who led the race up till that moment? This has never been explained.

Wisconsin was not alone.

These events in Wisconsin on November 4th were neither random nor independent.

They were intentional fraud used to steal the election.

President Trump knows this as well as most of America. In May President Trump shared this message:

At 6:31 in the morning on November 4th, a dump of 149,772 votes came in to the State of Michigan. Biden received 96% of those votes and the State miraculously went to him. Has the Michigan State Senate started their review of the Fraudulent Presidential Election of 2020 yet, or are they about to start? If not, they should be run out of office.

Likewise, at 3:42 in the morning, a dump of 143,379 votes came in to the state of Wisconsin, also miraculously, given to Biden. Where did these “votes” come from? Both were State Election changing events, and that is on top of the other corruption without even including the fact that neither state got Legislative approval, which is required under the United States Constitution.

Also, note something that we called HORSESH*T the day after the election. The state of Wisconsin have an 89% turnout in the election.

Umm. That didn’t happen.

This ratio was impossible as well and indicated likely fraud.

Why doesn’t Speaker Vos want to look into this?

Note: This post was updated to share more data on the still unprecedented vote spikes for Joe Biden on Election night and to correct numbers in Wisconsin.

 

[Dobbin]

Although the report does extensively detail ways in which the state can improve election administration, it did not find any evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Reported in the MEEDIA: "Mostly Honest Election."

That is except for the part which gave Biden the lead...

Dobbin

 

[Dobbin]

I'm down tonight.

I need a "pick-me-up."

RT 4:44

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yk55Ol83unI


USA! USA! USA!

Dobbin

 

[Publius]

The lack of hard proof of these weapons being in DC the government charges are purely fabricated and the case should be dismissed based upon that fact. This is like charging a man of rape simply because he is a man and has the equipment, owning weapons is legal and that alone should not be proof of a crime.

 

[marsh]

A Day of Reckoning Is Coming In Michigan As Patriots Have Been Working Behind The Scenes To Uncover Election Fraud | The Gateway Pundit | by Patty McMurray

Election Fraud Investigation Hesitancy in Michigan Guest post from Dr.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

A Day of Reckoning Is Coming In Michigan As Patriots Have Been Working Behind The Scenes To Uncover Election Fraud

By Patty McMurray
Published October 24, 2021 at 2:45pm

Election Fraud Investigation Hesitancy in Michigan

Guest post from Dr. Rebecca Behrends, vice president of research for Michigan Citizens for Election Integrity at MC4EI. Originally published in American Thinker.

Shared with permission by 100 Percent Fed Up – The subject of vaccine hesitancy is all over the news. Government agencies and Big Pharma stew and fret over how to address it and demolish it. The WHO has declared it one of the top threats to global health. But there is another type of hesitancy that is of paramount importance to the health and well-being of our nation, and it is election fraud investigation hesitancy. It is particularly a problem that plagues Republican legislators and establishment party members.

What part of “election security” do they not understand? The legacy media spout the notion that the 2020 election was the most secure in history. In fact, it was the least secure election.

In a soon to be released, explosive inside report on the events that occurred at the TCF Center in Detroit during the 2020 election, author Phil O’Halloran explores in gritty detail the egregious violations of state election laws and statutes in Michigan, major security breaches, illegalities, intimidation, and verbal as well as physical abuse of GOP challengers. O’Halloran was present at the TCF Center and was an eyewitness to what occurred. This report will be forthcoming from Michigan Citizens for Election Integrity.

The response from the Republican Michigan legislators who dominate the state House and Senate has been tepid at best and AWOL at worst. Michigan grassroots conservative patriots have sadly experienced the death of outrage in their beloved state. Where is the exhilarating “tear down this wall” moment of statesmanlike speechmaking à la President Reagan? How about the “this will not stand” salvo from George H.W. Bush to Saddam Hussein? Nowhere to be found.
Instead, we have Republican legislators who try to explain away the TCF debacle by saying that both sides (McBroom Report, see p. 13) threw temper tantrums and so nothing can be taken seriously. You know, kids will be kids! Child psychologists understand that this phrase as giving a kid a “get out of jail free card” with no responsibility or consequences. And that is exactly what Michigan Republican legislators handed over to the Democrat poll workers and election officials at the TCF Center on election day.

The vast majority of Republican legislators do not see the necessity of a forensic audit in Michigan. They hide behind NDAs (non-disclosure agreements) they have signed pertaining to any evidence they may have seen from the TCF Center in Detroit. They don’t put any muscle into utilizing their subpoena power to demand information from Detroit election officials such as video surveillance films of drop boxes, courtesy of Zuck Bucks. They ignore the abundance of affidavits filed by GOP poll challengers, all attesting to the same violations of law and fraudulent activities. They sidestep invites to conservative Republican rallies at the state capitol to demand action. They put up their fingers in the wind to see which way the audit wave is blowing in the hopes that it won’t blow their way!

Mainstream media say the Arizona audit proves that Biden won. It did no such thing, but the blind media only saw the “hand recount” part of the elephant and ran with it. Michigan legislators’ response was, “Whew, no fraud tsunami coming our way!” Just a tempest in a teapot.

The Republican-founded Lincoln Project led a national effort to harass lawyers who represented Republicans or the Trump campaign. Two Republican Michigan Board of Canvasser officials attempted to rescind their certifications of the election result after being subject to harassment, intimidation and doxxing. Any lawyer who wanted to come to their aid in defense had to think twice.

Threats were directed against them and their families. Meanwhile, a deafening silence emanated from Michigan legislators, who are supposed to have ultimate jurisdiction over elections.

It has been said that Republicans eat their young, while Democrats abort their young. For Republicans to ignore or deny the claims of their own party members of illegalities does not bode well for the health of their party going forward.

Democrats, too, have their own problems, with election-rigging and fraudulent practices in their ranks.

Ultimately, everyone suffers when we do not have a bipartisan commitment to the rule of law.

The issue goes deeper than just election-related matters. We no longer have a society that believes in what has been termed “obedience to the unenforceable.”

Clay Christensen, former Harvard business professor, discussed this in a compelling video on religious freedom. If we do not have a society of citizens willing to stand up for what is right without being cajoled to do so, we will never have enough lawyers, police, or judges to deal with the adverse consequences.

So, somewhere in a cemetery in Detroit, Mr. Moral Outrage lies entombed, where no one comes to visit or lay flowers. Case closed, as far as mainstream Republicans and Democrats are concerned. But a day of reckoning will yet unfold as conservative patriots in the state of Michigan bravely carry on in their quest for truth and justice. In the prescient words of Ben Franklin, “justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.”

Rebecca Behrends, M.D. is a retired E.D. physician and is vice president of research for Michigan Citizens for Election Integrity at MC4EI.com.

 

[marsh]

True The Vote loses in Georgia ballot harvesting battle…

Not enough evidence to pursue True The Vote ballot fraud claim The head of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation told the state GOP chairman that there’s not enough evidence to p…

citizenfreepress.com

True The Vote loses in Georgia ballot harvesting battle…
Posted by Kane on October 24, 2021 3:11 am




Not enough evidence to pursue True The Vote ballot fraud claim

The head of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation told the state GOP chairman that there’s not enough evidence to pursue claims of ballot harvesting in the 2020 elections based on cellphone signals.

GBI Director Vic Reynolds wrote in a letter obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that GPS signals alone, without any witnesses or perpetrators, fall short of meriting a fresh law enforcement inquiry.

“Based on what has been provided and what has not been provided, an investigation is not justified,” Reynolds wrote.

Reynolds’ letter to Texas-based True the Vote and Georgia GOP Chairman David Shafer came in response to their allegations that GPS data identified 279 cellphones that had made multiple trips to within 100 feet of ballot drop boxes between Oct. 1 and Jan. 5.

Georgia law prohibits ballot collections in which organizations collect and mail absentee ballots on behalf of voters. Only voters themselves or their relatives are allowed to handle their ballots.

“What has not been provided is any other kind of evidence that ties these cellphones to ballot harvesting. As it exists, the data does not rise to the level of probable cause that a crime has been committed.”

Without probable cause, the GBI would be unable to obtain a search warrant to examine the same GPS data provided by True the Vote, Reynolds wrote.

“It has been stated that there is ‘a source’ that can validate ballot harvesting. Despite repeated requests, that source has not been provided to either the GBI or the FBI,” Reynolds wrote.

True the Vote, which last year unsuccessfully challenged the eligibility of 360,000 Georgia voters, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. Shafer declined to comment. A GBI spokeswoman verified the legitimacy of the letter but said the agency had nothing more to say about it.

True the Vote purchased GPS data to map travel patterns of 1.2 trillion mobile signals late last year, then mapped those signals to find whether they had come close to ballot drop boxes.

“One way or another, ballot trafficking will soon be exposed on a massive scale,” True the Vote’s website says.

Further evidence to support their claims, however, has not been produced by the organization.

Investigators reported last week that they were unable to find counterfeit ballots in batches identified by Republican vote-counters. The next day, a judge dismissed a lawsuit by plaintiffs who wanted to inspect 147,000 absentee ballots cast in Fulton County for signs of fraud.

SOURCE — AJC

 

[marsh]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tVYkTR4wZA
31:48 min

How the 2020 Election Was Stolen

Oct 22, 2021


Lets Fix Stuff

In this video, I provide an overview of how the evidence indicates that the 2020 election was stolen in four phases: 1) Preparation 2) Main Attack 3) Backup Attack 4) Defense More information will be made available including links to specific evidence supporting assertions above in a documentary currently in production called "Was America Hijacked?". Once complete, this video will be made available for free to all seeking to view, download and share.

 

[marsh]

The Democrats' ActBlue Fundraising Platform Questioned Again for Election Related Improprieties | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

More shady issues from ActBlue were identified over the weekend. In June 2020 we reported on the Democrats’ funding machine ActBlue and how donations from Black Lives Matter (BLM) were flowing through this entity and handled by radical characters on the left.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The Democrats’ ActBlue Fundraising Platform Questioned Again for Election Related Improprieties

By Joe Hoft
Published October 25, 2021 at 7:50am

More shady issues from ActBlue were identified over the weekend.

In June 2020 we reported on the Democrats’ funding machine ActBlue and how donations from Black Lives Matter (BLM) were flowing through this entity and handled by radical characters on the left.

EXCLUSIVE: Donations to BLM Are Funneled Through Democrat Related ActBlue and Handled by Organization Led By Member of Weather Underground Terrorist Group

We then uncovered that ActBlue was accepting donations from individuals who supposedly are unemployed.

Shady Democrat Donor Website, ACTBLUE, Received Nearly Half ($346 Million) in Donations in 2019 From 4.7 Million Unemployed Donors Despite Unemployment at Less Than 4% in 2019

We also uncovered that ActBlue has no means of determining if donations are from foreign or domestic donors. (It’s illegal to accept foreign donations.)

More Shady Actions with the Democrats’ Clearinghouse ActBlue – Is China Funding the Biden Campaign?

The Daily Caller reported over the weekend that ActBlue is accepting donations but may be misrepresenting their situation.

ActBlue, the fundraising platform that commands a virtual monopoly over Democratic online fundraising, accumulated a cash hoard of at least $172.8 million by the end of 2020 while simultaneously claiming it needs “tips” from donors to keep its lights on.

ActBlue states on its website it asks for “tips” because it does not profit from processing contributions made through its platform, but ActBlue’s credit card processing arm has reported paying taxes on its business profits every year since 2013, IRS records show. From 2013 through 2020, ActBlue’s PAC collected $147.7 million in “tips” from small-dollar Democratic donors, FEC records show.

“If ActBlue’s claims of tips being essential to their operation are in fact false, and donors are making contributions based on those claims, this raises serious legal concerns,” Former National Republican Congressional Committee General Counsel Chris Winkelman told the DCNF.

Finally, as we’ve asked before, why is ActBlue or any entity associated with them given an ‘non-profit’ status? Non-profits are supposed to be non-biased.

 

[marsh]

Chairman of Jan. 6 Witch Hunt Committee Suggests Subpoenaing President Trump is not Out of the Question | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Chairman of Jan. 6 Witch Hunt Committee Suggests Subpoenaing President Trump is not Out of the Question

By Jim Hoft
Published October 25, 2021 at 9:21am

Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chair of the Jan. 6 Witch Hunt Committee, told reporters this weekend that subpoenaing President Trump in their sham investigation is not out of the question.

The committee is looking into the Jan. 6 protests and riot but is not releasing video from the day and they are not looking into the murder of two female Trump supporters that day.

The Washington Examiner reported:

The chairman of the House Jan. 6 Select Committee would not rule out subpoenaing former President Donald Trump as part of its investigation into the Capitol riot.

“Nobody’s off-limits,” Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, said when asked about it on CBS News’s Face the Nation on Sunday.

“We will be on an ongoing basis issuing subpoenas to various individuals around the country. If we have enough evidence, and obviously we are pursuing evidence, but if the evidence leads to former President Trump or anyone else, the committee is not reticent in pushing back on it, the chairman added. “We will go forward with it.

So, you know, it’s an investigation. We’re not trying to get ahead of the investigation. We’ll follow the facts and circumstances as they present themselves.”

The select committee has already subpoenaed several close advisers to Trump, 11 others tied to the organization of the Jan. 5 and Jan. 6 rallies that led up to the Capitol riot, and more.

 

[marsh]

Investigation by Wisconsin H.O.T. Uncovers Information Election Outsiders Secretly Worked to Develop an App to Track Voters and Ballots in Wisconsin | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

An investigation by Wisconsin citizens uncovered information about a former developer secretly working to develop an app to track voters and ballots in Wisconsin.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Investigation by Wisconsin H.O.T. Uncovers Information Election Outsiders Secretly Worked to Develop an App to Track Voters and Ballots in Wisconsin

By Joe Hoft
Published October 25, 2021 at 1:00pm

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

An investigation by Wisconsin citizens uncovers information about a former Facebook developer secretly working to develop an app to track voters and ballots in Wisconsin.

A group of patriots who call themselves ‘Wisconsin HOT’ uncovered another major scandal in Wisconsin. A Racine Clerk worked with a former Facebook employee to create an app to track votes in real-time before the 2020 election. The former Facebook employee was Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein. Rubenstein asked to get into ‘WisVote’ per an email obtained by Wisconsin HOT.

Information in this email was received from the City of Racine, Wisconsin in a record request made on March 20, 2021, by H.O.T. This information has been posted at www.hotgoverment.com.

H.O.T. tells us that in September of 2021 HOT received part of a records request from the City of Racine. From the emails, Racine, Wisconsin City Clerk Tara Coolidge sends a City of Racine ballot and envelope to Michael Spitzer Rubenstein to develop a tracking app with former Facebook designer Ari Steinberg. This app would gather information from WisVote in real-time as to who voted and who did not.

WisVote is a comprehensive election management system that municipalities and counties use to manage voters, absentee ballots, poll workers, and other election details. WEC developed the current system in 2016 to ensure voter data contained within remains secure. The email above states on 10-20-20 “So all I need from you is the data from WisVote”. “You can download the full list of active voters and absentee ballots. I can process everything, so you won’t need to.”

The Gableman investigation has this information.

This scandal was reported by Christina Bobb at OAN.

Rumble video on website 1:36 min

 

[marsh]

Jan. 6 ‘Insurrection’ Was A Failed Intelligence Operation 5:08 min

Jan. 6 ‘Insurrection’ Was A Failed Intelligence Operation [Darren Beattie - Revolver]
Bannons War Room Published October 25, 2021

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Full episode with expanded discussion:

Episode 1,360 – Jan 6th Was A Failed Intelligence Operation 48:56 min

Episode 1,360 – Jan 6th Was A Failed Intelligence Operation
Bannons War Room Published October 25, 20

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears to Have Led the Very First 1/6 Attack on the US Capitol - Revolver News

In order to protect the country from fictional right-wing "patriot" groups, did the FBI become an insurrectionist "patriot" movement?

www.revolver.news

Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol
October 25, 2021 ( ago)

In a House hearing on Thursday, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) questioned AG Merrick Garland about a mysterious man, Ray Epps, instructing protesters to enter the US Capitol building on January 5, and who later shepherded crowds towards the Capitol on January 6.

I questioned Attorney General Garland about whether there were Federal Agents present on 1/6 and whether they agitated to go into the Capitol. Attorney General Garland refused to answer. pic.twitter.com/RHq3Yd2pbu
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) October 21, 2021

The story of the mystery man, Ray Epps, featured in Rep. Massie’s video above is in fact far more shocking than even the good Congressman implies in the hearing. It’s a story so strange, and so scandalous at every turn, that it threatens to shatter the entire official narrative of the “Capitol Breach” and expose yet another dimension of proactive federal involvement in the so-called “insurrection” of January 6th.

If Revolver News’s previous reporting points to a proactive role of the federal government in relation to the conspiracy cases against Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, the Ray Epps story that follows suggests a similar, yet more egregious, explicit, direct and immediate degree of federal involvement in the breach of the Capitol itself.

Here is a transcript of Thomas Massie’s exchange with the Attorney General, just in case you skipped past the video above.

Rep. Massie: As far as we can determine, the individual who was saying he’ll probably go to jail, he’ll probably be arrested, but they need to go into the Capitol the next day, is then directing people into the Capitol the next day, is then the next day directing people to the Capitol. And as far as we can find. You said this is one of the most sweeping in history. Have you seen that video, or those frames from that video?

AG Garland: So as I said at the outset, one of the norms of the Justice Department is to not comment on pending investigations, and particularly not to comment on particular scenes or particular individuals.

Rep. Massie: I was hoping today to give you an opportunity to put to rest the concerns that people have that there were federal agents or assets of the federal government present on January 5 and January 6.

Can you tell us, without talking about particular incidents or particular videos, how many agents or assets of the federal government were present on January 6, whether they agitated to go into the Capitol, and if any of them did?

AG Garland: So I’m not going to violate this norm of, uh, of, of, of, the rule of law.

[Looks down and away]
I’m not going to comment on an investigation that’s ongoing.

There is good reason why AG Garland ran from Massie’s question faster than he could find words — and why he couldn’t even keep eye contact as he was dodging Massie’s gaze.

After months of research, Revolver’s investigative reporting team can now reveal that Ray Epps appears to be among the primary orchestrators of the very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades at 12:50pm on January 6. Epps appears to have led the “breach team” that committed the very first illegal acts on that fateful day. What’s more, Epps and his “breach team” did all their dirty work with 10 minutes still remaining in President Trump’s National Mall speech, and with the vast majority of Trump supporters still 30 minutes away from the Capitol.

Secondly, Revolver also determined, and will prove below, that the the FBI stealthily removed Ray Epps from its Capitol Violence Most Wanted List on July 1, just one day after Revolver exposed the inexplicable and puzzlesome FBI protection of known Epps associate and Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes. July 1 was also just one day after separate New York Times report amplified a glaring, falsifiable lie about Epps’s role in the events of January 6.

Lastly, Ray Epps appears to have worked alongside several individuals — many of them suspiciously unindicted — to carry out a breach of the police barricades that induced a subsequent flood of unsuspecting MAGA protesters to unwittingly trespass on Capitol restricted grounds and place themselves in legal jeopardy.

Corroborating Ray Epps’s Identity

Identifying the individual in Thomas Massie’s video as Ray Epps was a surprisingly quick and easy task for the Internet.

It took less than a week after January 6 for online researchers to track Epps down and confirm his identity. Researchers uncovered his personal Facebook profile, where Epps shared his life story on Mark Zuckerberg’s social media app, under his real name.

(Very long article - read the rest at Revolver Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol - Revolver )

 

[marsh]

Demand for forensic audits of 2020 election in all 50 states rapidly gaining support

Originally signed by 41 state legislators from 15 states, open letter prompted by Maricopa County voting review has now been signed by 150 from 38 states.

justthenews.com

Demand for forensic audits of 2020 election in all 50 states rapidly gaining support

Originally signed by 41 state legislators from 15 states, open letter prompted by Maricopa County voting review has now been signed by 150 from 38 states.

Updated: October 24, 2021 - 10:39pm

Arizona state Sen. Wendy Rogers, a Republican, published a letter to the American people following the release of the Maricopa County audit results on Sept. 24 calling for forensic audits of all 50 states' 2020 election results.

Originally signed by 41 state legislators from 15 states, the letter has now, less than a month later, been signed by 150 lawmakers from 38 states.

Claiming that "our representative republic suffered a corrupted 2020 election," the letter states:

"In addition to Arizona, sworn affidavits have accumulated from many states detailing rampant corruption and mismanagement in the election process. Fraud and inaccuracies have already been shown through multiple audits and canvasses in multiple states, as well as through lawsuits challenging the validity of election results in several counties in multiple states.

"We have come to the conclusion that all 50 states need to be forensically audited. Voter rolls should be scrubbed with a canvass of the voters to ensure future integrity of our elections. ...

"We call on each state to decertify its electors where it has been shown the elections were certified prematurely and inaccurately."

The letter was published after the highly anticipated Maricopa County audit report found, according to Rogers, there were "too many discrepancies to declare an outright winner of Arizona's electoral votes."

"Thank you all for helping our movement get more people on board with this letter!" Sen. Rogers said in a statement. "Please read the letter, see who is on, and who is not on. Those who are not on, please ask them to sign. If they don't sign, start working on primarying them."

Former President Donald Trump mentioned the letter during a "Save America" rally in Perry, Ga. last month, and momentum has grown since then, with the number of legislators who have signed it more than doubling since earlier this month.

However, legislators from the states of Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, Vermont and Virginia have not signed it. And in the two largest red states, only one state lawmaker from each has signed on: Rep. Steve Toth (R-Texas), and Rep. Anthony Sabatini (R-Florida).

Although the number of those who have signed is growing, it is still miniscule compared to the total number of state legislators in the U.S.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, there were 7,383 state legislative seats — the majority of which are Republican, Ballotpedia reports.

After the 2020 Election, there are 19 state houses controlled by Democrats and 29 controlled by Republicans.

The call for ongoing election audits has been described by Democrats and the mainstream media as a circus, a lost cause, a failed attempt, misinformation, and even a "fake election audit."

However, Kari Lake, the frontrunner in the 2022 Republican primary to succeed outgoing Arizona Republican Gov. Doug Doucey, has called for incumbent Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat who is also running for governor, to be "locked up" over the state's alleged election fraud.

Lake says she wouldn't have certified Arizona's election as Ducey did, and still supports decertifying the state's election.

Hobbs, meanwhile, has claimed that "Trump is on the side of the freaking Nazis."

"The 2020 election was the most secure election in our state's history," Hobbs maintains. "Unfortunately, we have elected leaders who continue to promote falsehoods. We need to change the leadership in our state."

 

[marsh]

McMURRAY EXCLUSIVE: Likely Fed Operative Ray Epps Filmed Hurling Massive Trump Sign at Capitol Police -- Likely Set Up Jan. 6 Protester Ryan Samsel Who Rots in Prison to This Day [VIDEO] | The Gateway Pundit | by Patty McMurray

Has America been scammed?

www.thegatewaypundit.com

McMURRAY EXCLUSIVE: Fed Operative Ray Epps Filmed Hurling Massive Trump Sign at Capitol Police — And Set Up Jan. 6 Protester Ryan Samsel Who Rots in Prison to This Day [VIDEO]

By Patty McMurray
Published October 25, 2021 at 8:03pm

Has America been scammed? Have Trump supporters been framed to look like domestic terrorists, while Democrats walk away from the biggest voter fraud scam in American history?

Speaking of scams…Who is Ray Epps? And why did he spend two days inciting Trump supporters to go inside the Capitol?

Here’s what we know.'

100 Percent Fed Up reports – Ray Epps was the president of the Oath Keepers in Arizona.

Mr. Epps worked alongside the Oath Keeper Founder and President Stewart Rhodes.

On Memorial Day 2011, the Oath Keepers held a memorial service for a fallen member. Epps and Rhodes stood side-by-side for much of the memorial service.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452771609140416522

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1452771609140416522
.06 min

Epps can be seen standing behind Stewart Rhodes while Taps is being played.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452772549847355403

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1452772549847355403
.54 min

Since then, Epps has been relatively quiet but has recently been ID’d by Revolver News as one of the primary instigators in the January 6th “insurrection.”

The night before the “insurrection,” Epps appeared to be encouraging Trump supporters gathered near BLM Square in Washington DC to join him, as he announced that he planned to go “inside the Capitol.” Epps told an unidentified male (fed agent?) “In fact, tomorrow—I’m not even gonna say it because I might be arrested, but tomorrow—We need to go INTO the Capitol!” Trump supporters who could smell a rat shout, “Fed…Fed…Fed!”

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1346680954094403585

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1346680954094403585
.42 min

On January 6th, Epps stood in front of a piece of heavy machinery, shouting at Trump supporters, “We are going to the Capitol, where our problems are,” he yelled. “It’s that direction!” he said, pointing. He encouraged the Trump supporters to tell everyone, “Please spread the word,” he implored.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452774193452433420

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1452774193452433420
.32 min

As protesters first reached the Capitol, where Epps has been encouraging them to go for two days, they began to confront the scant number of police officers standing near low-security barriers. A young man wearing a black t-shirt and red MAGA cap can be seen engaging with police officers at the barriers. Suddenly, out of nowhere, Ray Epps appears and whispers in the ear of the young man, Ryan Samsel, a PA resident with an extensive violent criminal background. Epps seems to know to target Samsel, as he whispers in his ear. Almost immediately afterward, Samsel begins to push down the barriers, allowing protesters to run through the barriers and onto the Capitol grounds. Epps disappears.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452781663868620801

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1452781663868620801
1:38 min

Here’s Epps re-appearing with the protesters as they march toward the Capitol:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1366655934760689664

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1366655934760689664
.39 min

Once inside the grounds of Capitol where the staged “insurrection began,” Epps can be seen helping to hoist a giant Trump billboard over the head of the Capitol Police who are allegedly trying to control the crowd. Epps appears to be very good at instigating Trump supporters to act and then backs off once the action is in motion. He can be seen in the right-hand corner of the large billboard but backs off once it is successfully pushed into the police barricade. Others (likely fed operatives) in the crowd, can be heard shouting, “Hold the line,” as they motion for the crowd to rush the police.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452778764832841733

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1452778764832841733
1:11 min

Once the protesters made their way onto the steps of the Capitol after Epps, the self-proclaimed leader of the staged “insurrection,” encouraged them to rush the Capitol Police, he suddenly became a defender of the police from the same protesters he incited earlier.

Rumble video on website :31 min

If Nancy Pelosi and friends in the Democrat Party really wanted to get to the bottom of the so-called “insurrection,” it sure seems like a good place to start would be with Ray Epps.

Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit and Patty McMurray of 100 Percent Fed Up interviewed Rhodes on March 14, 2021. Rhodes asked Jim Hoft if we could interview him so he could set the record straight about the role members of the Oath Keepers played in the January 6th so-called “insurrection.”

In his interview with us, Rhodes told us that he was trying to reach out to Trump to encourage him to enact the Insurrection Act, but they were unable to communicate with him. “The real targets are Trump supporters,” he said, adding, “They want to come after you next.”

Rhodes also spoke out against the FBI. He told us the FBI “tried to recruit them [members of the Oath Keepers] to get them to become informants on the rest of us.” Rhodes told us, “The FBI is all about trying to put as many patriots in prison as they can.” The Oath Keepers founder told us he “disagreed” with the Oath Keepers going inside the Capitol, but he will not “disavow them” for their actions, saying, “We are going to close ranks around them and support them.”

To date, there is no evidence Rhodes has lifted a finger to help any of his members.

Last week, Revolver News published a bombshell investigative piece accusing Stewart Rhodes of working with federal agents to stage the “insurrection” on January 6th. We reached out to Stewart in a text message to ask him to do a follow-up interview with us where we would give him a chance to respond to the allegations against him. Someone (we can’t be sure it was Stewart because the respondent appeared to be speaking in the third person) answered our text message by asking, “Which recent allegations against SR [Stewart Rhodes]?” Jim responded to the text reply, “The Revolver News articles saying Stuart [sp] is gov informant.” Rhodes did not reply. It’s been five days since we last communicated with him.

Last week, Rep. Massie introduced a video showing Epps, who appeared to be working with the feds to incite an insurrection to AG GArland. Garland refused to comment. Adding more intrigue to the Epps story, the Arizona Oath Keeper originally appeared on the FBI’s list of January 6th suspects as suspect #16. However, after Massie’s testimony, Epps was removed from the FBI’s website.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451272067173736455

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1451272067173736455
1:17 min

Today, Revolver News responded with an extensive report- After months of research, Revolver’s investigative reporting team can now reveal that Ray Epps appears to be among the primary orchestrators of the very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades at 12:50 pm on January 6. Epps appears to have led the “breach team” that committed the very first illegal acts on that fateful day.

What’s more, Epps and his “breach team” did all their dirty work with 10 minutes still remaining in President Trump’s National Mall speech, and with the vast majority of Trump supporters still 30 minutes away from the Capitol.

Secondly, Revolver also determined that the FBI stealthily removed Ray Epps from its Capitol Violence Most Wanted List on July 1, just one day after Revolver exposed the inexplicable and puzzle-some FBI protection of known Epps associate and Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes. July 1 was also just one day after a separate New York Times report amplified a glaring, falsifiable lie about Epps’s role in the events of January 6.

Lastly, Ray Epps appears to have worked alongside several individuals — many of them suspiciously unindicted — to carry out a breach of the police barricades that induced a subsequent flood of unsuspecting MAGA protesters to unwittingly trespass on Capitol restricted grounds and place themselves in legal jeopardy.

By January 8, the FBI Capitol Violence Most Wanted List featured a big fat friendly face shot of Ray Epps. The FBI’s Washington Field Office, in a tweet the same day, called for the public’s help in identifying Epps. Epps, dressed in full camo with a bright red “Trump” hat, is the FBI’s “Suspect 16.” Way Back Time Machine archived the photo below:

Epp’s image has curiously been removed from the FBI site. Here’s what their website looks like now.

Stay tuned, we will have more to report on this subject.

 

[marsh]

"The Video Was Quite Clear, IT WAS MURDER!" - GOP Lawmaker and Former Sheriff Speaks Out on Ashli Babbitt Murder by Capitol Police (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

“The Video Was Quite Clear, IT WAS MURDER!” – GOP Lawmaker and Former Sheriff Speaks Out on Ashli Babbitt Murder by Capitol Police (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published October 25, 2021 at 7:34pm

Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) served 30 years in law enforcement and 21 years in the US Army Reserve. Troy Nehls served as Fort Bend, Texas Sheriff for 8 years from 2012 to 2020.

On Monday Rep. Nehls joined Greg Kelly on Newsmax to discuss the Jan. 6 protest and riot. Nehls told Greg Kelly US veteran Ashli Babbitt was murdered by Capitol Hill Police Officer Lt. Mike Byrd on January 6th.

Rep. Troy Nehls: “It was murder… I’ve been a lawman for 30 years… The point is I know a little bit about use of force. I understand a little bit about grand juries. This shooting should have at least gone to a grand jury. But the Department of Justice has no intent of doing a thorough investigation… The video was quite clear. It was murder.”

But since Ashli was a Trump supporter, the killer walks.

Via Greg Kelly Reports:

Rumble video on website 4:08 min

 

[marsh]

Emails show ‘election fraud’ in mass absentee ballots mailed to Connecticut voters…

Emails show a flurry of confusion over mass absentee ballots mailed to Connecticut voters GUILFORD, Conn (WTNH) – News 8 has obtained emails surrounding the conversations leading up t…

citizenfreepress.com

Emails show ‘election fraud’ in mass absentee ballots mailed to Connecticut voters…
Posted by Kane on October 25, 2021 7:38 pm


Emails show a flurry of confusion over mass absentee ballots mailed to Connecticut voters

GUILFORD, Conn (WTNH) – News 8 has obtained emails surrounding the conversations leading up to an Absentee Ballot Application controversy in Guilford, and it paints a disturbing picture. At our request, the Secretary of the State’s Office released a number of emails to us after our tv report concerning an election complaint.

Republican voters in Guilford filed a complaint with the State’s Election Enforcement Commission. They say a Democrat Committee mailer included a “pre-signed” absentee ballot application which is a violation of election law.

Absentee ballot applications are allowed to be mass mailed to eligible voters. The signature on the application has to be “a wet signature.” The law does not require the signer to be present with the voter.

The emails reveal a flurry of confusion around the signature rule. And what appears to be a political consultant admitting past Democrat practices may have been illegal.

August 9, 2021, a Democrat Campaign Consultant, Mike Farina from “Blue Edge Strategies” sends an email to the Secretary of the State’s office writing:

“Is that in statute? Or are we safe sending applications out in bulk with a printed signature? We’ve done that for years with no issue (but that doesn’t mean it’s been legal).

The Elections Director, Ted Bromley responds: “Digital is fine.”

Then a flurry of emails on the issue is sent on October 4, 2021.

A campaign manager from Newington reaches out to the Town Clerk, asking for clarification on whether a digital copy of a signature is okay.

It’s unclear what the clerk’s answer was, but he does reach out to the Secretary of State’s Office, after the campaign manager forwards the August 9th email chain between the consultant Farina and the elections director Bromley.

In his email the Newington Town Clerk, James Krupienski writes:

“Hi Ted, I literally just received his response right after your email. See below. This is becoming a nuclear football. – James”

That email was sent at 1:34 pm.

Instead of responding to the town clerk, Bromley the Director of Elections reaches out to the Democratic Consultant Farina at 1:40 pm.

“Mike, just been made aware of the fact that you are using my response to you for statewide purposes. That being the case, let me be clear. When I responded “digital is fine” I meant a copy of an actual signature. The examples I have been provided are not a copy of a digital signature, they are a Microsoft Word version of a script. This is not appropriate. It would have been best that you provided me with an example.

Obviously, the requirement of a wet signature or a copy of a real signature is to ensure that the “assistor” actually “assisted” in the document. Reproducing applications at a print shop goes far beyond assisting.

At 2:38 pm the same day the Newington town clerk writes back:

“Hi Ted, thank you for the response, but I am still a bit confused. Based on you description below, the signature in Section IV would be valid? (See Attachment) This is a signature of the Chairman, digitally imposed on to the document, and sent by their hired consultant. Is there any recourse that I should expect from the other side. Also, should I still be filing an SEEC complaint to protect my office regarding the processing?

Lots of questions, I know. Thanks for your help.

At 4:32 pm Bromley writes back:

“Yes I think so. Although we may demand more next year. Work with SEEC on that. The other signatures I have seen were signatures made from Microsoft word…..so that would not be valid.”

It’s unclear whether the SEEC has opened an investigation into the signature controversy.

On Thursday, the Secretary of the State’s office issued a letter to state election regulators. In it, the secretary’s Director of Elections admits “a miscommunication” to campaign operatives about a signature rule.

News 8 learned there may be as many as a dozen towns affected.

Despite the mistake, voters can still receive absentee ballots and send them in.

SOURCE

 

[marsh]

WI Audit Report: Results Certified Despite Illegal Ballots

The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau (LAB) was directed by the Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC) to do an electi...

uncoverdc.com

The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau (LAB) was directed by the Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC) to do an elections administration audit on February 11, 2021. The highly anticipated final report is now published.

The City of Madison (2nd most populous in Wisconsin) and Milwaukee County (most populous) did not allow LAB to physically handle election records, including ballots and absentee ballot certificates, citing chain of custody concerns. Along with another small town that refused, 18.9% of all ballots cast in Wisconsin were inaccessible to this LAB audit.

The LAB audit is only one of several ongoing election integrity efforts in Wisconsin. An investigation with subpoena power is led by a former Supreme Court Justice, Michael Gableman acting as Special Counsel. Various legislation has been introduced to reform election law. Reps Janel Brandtjen and Timothy Ramthun are still pushing for a full forensic audit of ballots and machines.

Keeping in mind that the certified totals that gave Joe Biden Wisconsin’s electoral votes have him winning the state by about 20,500 votes, here are a few of the more significant takeaways of Friday’s LAB audit report.

Registration

• 950,000+ voters were found to be newly registered in 2020 alone (~3.3 million Wisconsinites voted in total). Half of those registered online, and ~6% by mail.
• 45,000+ of those newly registered voters provided personally identifiable information during registration that did not match existing data from the WI Department of Transportation (DOT) (vehicle registrations, driver’s licenses, state identification cards). For 13,000+ more, no attempt was made to match the information with DOT data.

Absentee Ballots

• There is a sizeable gap between the county with the highest percentage of voters voting by absentee (74.4%) and the county with the lowest (26.3%).
• The absentee certificate is typically the envelope in which the ballot is returned to the election clerk. ~7% of a sampling of absentee certificates had incomplete information– mostly partial witness addresses—but less than 0.1% of absentee ballots were rejected (absentee ballots can be rejected by the clerk if the certificates are incomplete). Simple extrapolation implicates as many as 100,000 certificates with incomplete information statewide.
• Statutes require that the certificates include voter signature, witness signature, and witness address. Almost all certificates reviewed had voter signatures, though no review was reported as having been completed that would determine whether those signatures matched existing signatures in voter registration and other state data.
• Absentee ballots can be ‘remade’ if the equipment cannot read it. A sampling of ballots that were counted at central counting locations revealed 1.4% of them had been remade. Though that sample is not random, it would extrapolate to 28,000 statewide.
• Municipal election clerks did not initial absentee ballot certificates consistently as required by statutes, which indicates that in some cases, that ballot must not be counted.

Electronic Voting Machines

• Only half of a sampling of municipalities completed statutorily required testing of electronic voting equipment within 10 days of the election.
• ~13% of election day forms were not initialed as they should have been to indicate verification of the integrity of the tamper-proof seals on electronic voting machines.

Administration by the Wisconsin Elections Commission

• The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) did not consistently obtain data from the 3rd party Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) that can be used to compare both inter-and intra-state data toward voter roll accuracy. Membership to the system is required by statute, but consistent data policy is not.
• WEC provided guidance that did not comply with state statutes regarding absentee voting by indefinitely confined voters, dropboxes, relocating polling places, and adjourning on election night. That guidance is the subject of the ongoing Special Counsel election integrity investigation.
• WEC did not complete statutorily required error rate analysis of electronic voting equipment across the state.
• WEC received 1,521 election-related concerns through its website. The commission was not required and did not track whether or how they responded to those concerns.

(Scribd doc at website)


Download this PDF

The report is broken down into the following sections:

• Training
• Maintenance of Voter Registration Records
• Absentee Ballots
• Ballot Processing
• Electronic Voting Equipment
• Post-Election Audit
• Complaints Filed with Clerks
• Complaints and Concerns Filed with WEC
• Election Recount Costs

LAB opens its report by defining its own civic mission:

“The Legislative Audit Bureau supports the Legislature in its oversight of Wisconsin government and its promotion of efficient and effective state operations by providing nonpartisan, independent, accurate, and timely audits and evaluations of public finances and the management of public programs.“

The report summary states:

“Because our audit was not approved until three months after the November 2020 General Election, we did not directly observe Election Day practices. Therefore, to complete this audit, we relied on available evidence we were able to access. We contacted WEC’s staff, surveyed all 1,835 municipal clerks and 72 county clerks in April 2021, contacted 179 clerks to obtain additional information about elections administration issues, analyzed voter registration data, physically reviewed 14,710 certificates that accompanied absentee ballots returned to clerks in 29 municipalities throughout the state, reviewed the results of 175 statutorily required tests of electronic voting equipment that clerks in 25 municipalities completed before the November 2020 General Election, and reviewed all 45 sworn, written complaints pertaining to the General Election that were filed with WEC as of late-May 2021.

We make 30 recommendations to WEC’s staff for various improvements and include 18 issues for legislative consideration.“

The first three appendices list the WEC Commissioners, the title of each municipal clerk and county clerk that was contacted by LAB, and each of the 3rd party groups that were contacted as a result of being associated with reports of elections administration issues. Appendix 4 charts the results of the sampling of Absentee Ballot Certificates that LAB reviewed. Appendix 6 charts the results of LAB’s review of whether electronic voting machine tests were conducted by each municipality as required by law. Appendix 7 lists recommendations LAB is making to the WEC; Appendix 8 lists legislative considerations for lawmakers. Appendix 10 shows the number of indefinitely confined individuals who were able to vote without providing photo ID in each county.

The scope of the audit allowed auditors the latitude to review election processes in its 1,849 municipalities, including voter registration, absentee voting, electronic voting equipment, any recounts that took place, and election laws. In addition to the authority to review the performance, methodology, and error rate of each Wisconsin electoral jurisdiction’s voting system, LAB could also report on adherence to state election law by administrators and municipal clerks in them.

LAB’s audit was also granted authority to review conduct by the WEC, including its handling of complaints made against election officials and efforts to maintain the accuracy of voter rolls.

LAB notes that upon publication of the report, and submission to the JLAC members in the state Senate and Assembly, legislation may be introduced or hearings called based on the findings.

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin Senate to launch its own 2020 election investigation

Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu says probe prompted by audit bureau probe finding numerous failures in election.

justthenews.com

Wisconsin Senate to launch its own 2020 election investigation
Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu says probe prompted by audit bureau probe finding numerous failures in election.

By Benjamin Yount
Updated: October 25, 2021 - 11:04pm

There will be more questions from lawmakers in Madison as to just what happened before and during last year’s election.

Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu on Monday announced that the State Senate is launching its own investigation into the 2020 election.

"The audit released on [Friday] paints a grim picture of the Wisconsin Election Commission and their careless administration of election law in Wisconsin," LeMahieu said in a statement. "The audit shows numerous failures within WEC which undermined the free, fair, and transparent elections Wisconsinites deserve."

That audit found numerous problems with voter roll accuracy, absentee voting, the use of drop boxes, and raised questions about the role of outside groups like the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life.

Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) said his Joint Audit Committee will hold hearings and lead an investigation.

"I am currently reviewing the audit report which made 30 recommendations, including 18 items that may involve legislation," Marklein explained. "We have taken action on a number of these items in legislation that has already been vetoed by Governor Tony Evers, but we will consider our options."

LeMahieu said one of the options may be ending the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

"We will assess the full impact of WEC's deficiencies and determine the best course of action for the future of election administration given the now documented failures of the current administration and staff," LeMahieu said in a statement.

There are already two investigations in the Wisconsin Assembly, one from Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) and another from Rep. Janel Brandtjen (R-Menomonee Falls) that’s being run through her elections committee.
Brandtjen on Monday slammed the WEC, and said the faith in Wisconsin's electoral process has been "shattered."

"The Wisconsin Election Commission failed to properly manage voter registration, train clerks, or comply with security issues on electronic voting equipment," she said. "To make matters worse, 48,554 indefinitely confined individuals who had not previously voted with an ID or did not have a photo ID on file, voted on Election Day. The citizens of Wisconsin deserve fair, honest and transparent elections."

 

[marsh]

BREAKING: Fulton County Georgia Ordered More Than One Million Absentee Ballots from Printer Days Before the 2020 Election Knowing There Was No Time to Mail Them Out - Why? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

More shocking news on Runbeck printing company which supplied ballots to both Arizona and Georgia.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Fulton County Georgia Ordered More Than One Million Absentee Ballots from Printer Days Before the 2020 Election Knowing There Was No Time to Mail Them Out – Why?

By Joe Hoft
Published October 25, 2021 at 8:38pm

More shocking news on Runbeck printing company which supplied ballots to both Arizona and Georgia.

We’ve already made some shocking observations about Runbeck – the Arizona printing company involved in the 2020 Election in both Arizona and Georgia.

We know that Runbeck shipped thousands of ballots to the same guy in Georgia who was behind the calls of a water main break in Atlanta and who was behind the removal of the whistleblower from working in Georgia elections. (If there was a Republican Party in Georgia who cared about the integrity of their elections, this guy would be gone.)

EXCLUSIVE: Mysterious Georgia Ballots Were Addressed to Elections Consultant Dwight Brower - The Same Guy Who Reported the Fake Water Main Break and Then Terminated Election Whistleblower | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Mysterious Georgia ballots were addressed to Dwight Brower with the Fulton County Department of Voter Registration and Elections which were sent from Arizona. Brower also is connected to the fake water main break in State Farm Arena and the termination of a poll worker and whistleblower who...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

We also know Brian Runbeck works for the company with his name. Although not listed as a member of the Executive Team, Brian Runbeck, identifies himself as the Client Services Manager/Project Manager and Production Coordinator at Runbeck Election Services. He manages the production of election ballots and related official election material. He claims he handles high pressure deadlines and high volume production.

Mr. Runbeck also made 50 separate donations to Act Blue, Biden for President and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee between August 15 and October 30, 2020.

We also know that ballots in Georgia were different for Democrat and Republican areas. This was done by the printer.

NOTE that the BAR CODE is missing from these ballots. This is important because as IT specialist Javon Pulitzer noted in testimony earlier this week, the Fulton County ballots in the general election for GOP precincts included a barcode while the ballots in Democrat districts did not include the barcode. (Again, if there was a Republican Party in Georgia who cared, this would be investigated and criminals put in jail.)

Today Kevin Moncla reports at Uncoverdc more on Runbeck printing.

According to Moncla, Fulton County, Georgia ordered and received over 1 million ballots from Runbeck in the last 10 or so days before the election. The ballots received were absentee ballots based on the size of the ballots ordered and related invoices.

With just 10 days until the November 3rd election, there was literally no way to sort, prepare, fold, stuff and mail out the ballots before the election. Especially considering there were no envelopes ordered. This fact alone removes any possibility that they intended to mail the ballots.

Moncla lists other reasons why this should be investigated. It makes no sense why Fulton County would need over a million absentee ballots for the 2020 Election only days before Election Day knowing that they would never be mailed out.

If we had a Republican Party they would get to the bottom of this. If we had a Justice Department that wanted justice they would get to the bottom of this. If we had a Democrat Party that doesn’t steal elections this never would have happened.

 

[marsh]

BOOM! Missouri and Ohio Terminate National School Boards Association Membership Over Letter Labeling Parents 'Domestic Terrorists' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The National School Boards Association on Friday apologized to the Biden Administration characterizing concerned parents at school meetings as potential domestic terrorists.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BOOM! Missouri and Ohio Terminate National School Boards Association Membership Over Letter Labeling Parents ‘Domestic Terrorists’

By Jim Hoft
Published October 26, 2021 at 8:34am

The National School Boards Association on Friday apologized to the Biden Administration characterizing concerned parents at school meetings as potential domestic terrorists.

The letter came just one day after the Washington Free Beacon obtained emails revealing the Biden Regime was coordinating with the NSBA in the weeks leading up to the program targeting and attacking American parents. The NSBA wrote:

“On behalf of the NSBA, we regret and apologize for the letter. To be clear, the safety of school board members, other public school officials and educators, and students is our top priority, and there remains important work to be done on this issue. However, there was no justification for some of the language included in the letter.”

“We deeply value…the voices of parents, who should and must continue to be heard when it comes to decisions about their children’s education, health and safety.”

In response to the disgusting developments by the NSBA Ohio and Missouri have terminated their National School Boards Association membership.



The Ohio School Board Association (OSBA) cited the NSBA’s letter to Biden as the reason.

Missouri also terminated its membership with the radical national organization.

ABC17 reported:

The Missouri School Board Association board of directors has withdrawn the association’s participation in the National School Boards Association due to the NSBA’s recent actions, including the letter to the White House.

Officials say the NSBA has demonstrated it does not currently align with MSBA’s guiding principles of local governance.

In a release, the MSBA officials said,

We also believe that no school board member or educator should ever have to endure threats of violence or acts of intimidation against themselves or their families for making these difficult decisions. However, attempting to address that issue with federal intervention should not be the first step in most cases, and is antithetical to our long-standing tradition of local control. Further, the use of inflammatory terms in the NSBA letter is not a model for promoting greater civility and respect for the democratic process.

The organization says that the withdrawal from the NSBA will not affect the MSBA programs and services.

 

[marsh]

Merrick Garland video that everyone missed…

Congressman Grills Merrick Garland over Democrat’s Violent Insurrection at Dept of Interior Congressman Greg Steube questions Merrick Garland over Left-wing agitators forcing their way…

citizenfreepress.com

Merrick Garland video that everyone missed…
Posted by Kane on October 26, 2021 1:27 pm

View: https://youtu.be/0rqji93g8p4
5:46 min
Congressman Grills Merrick Garland over Democrat’s Violent Insurrection at Dept of Interior

Congressman Greg Steube questions Merrick Garland over Left-wing agitators forcing their way into the DOI on October 14th. CFP posted 17 stories/videos on the Garland testimony last week but here’s one we missed.

 

[marsh]

THE REGIME IS REAL: Corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson Releases Jan. 6 Protester from Pre-Trial Custody After Repudiates Donald Trump | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson released a January 6th protester after several months from pre-trial incarceration after he disavowed President Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

THE REGIME IS REAL: Corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson Releases Jan. 6 Protester from Pre-Trial Custody After Repudiates Donald Trump

By Jim Hoft
Published October 26, 2021 at 7:02pm

Corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson released a January 6th protester after several months from pre-trial incarceration after he disavowed President Trump.

We are now living under a communist cloak of oppression.

Via Mike Cernovich:



Thomas Sibick wrote a letter to Amy Berman Jackson repudiating President Donald Trump.

He says Trump should be “ostracized” from society.

Amy Berman Jackson is the same wicked DC judge who harassed and abused Roger Stone for years.

The far left judge lied repeatedly during his sentencing and accused Stone of threatening her which was a ridiculous joke.

The woman is not fit for office and this has been obvious for years.

CRAZED Demon Judge Amy Berman Jackson Lied Repeatedly During Sentencing - Says Stone Threatened Her -- Should be Imprisoned for 9 Years! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Trump confidante Roger Stone was sentenced Thursday in a Washington DC Court in front of controversial far left Judge Amy Berman Jackson.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Her antics have not gone unnoticed.

WATCH: Tucker Carlson Argues Roger Stone Judge Amy Berman Jackson ‘Deserves to be Impeached,' Calls Her ‘Democratic Activist Wearing Robes’ | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Fox News host Tucker Carlson called for U.S.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[vestige]

List candidate

 

[marsh]

BREAKING: Wisconsin Senate Finally Decides to Request Investigation into 2020 Election - Will They Finally Look Into Milwaukee? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The Wisconsin Senate has decided to perform an investigation into the 2020 Election. This action appears in response to the state auditor’s report released last week. The Wisconsin auditor released a report last week of its audit of the 2020 Election. As expected this audit report was weak...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Wisconsin Senate Finally Decides to Request Investigation into 2020 Election – Will They Finally Look Into Milwaukee?

By Joe Hoft
Published October 26, 2021 at 8:10pm

The Wisconsin Senate has decided to perform an investigation into the 2020 Election. This action appears in response to the state auditor’s report released last week.

The Wisconsin auditor released a report last week of its audit of the 2020 Election. As expected this audit report was week because it sampled a minimum number of ballots and the audit team lacked the technical expertise to perform a robust audit.

Wisconsin State Auditors Complete Election Audit - Due to Sampling, Lack of Auditor Expertise, and Technological Savvy - It's Grossly Inadequate - Exactly What Speaker Vos Wanted | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The people of Wisconsin deserve much more. The results of an audit by the state audit team in Wisconsin were released this week. As predicted, these results lack the comprehensive audit work needed to uncover the fraud in the state’s November 2020 Election. Wisconsin House Speaker Robin Vos...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

We did learn from the state auditors report that 60,000 individuals registered to vote whose personally identifiable information did not match the same information on the same individuals from the motor vehicle department.

In 2020 Election in Wisconsin 60,000 People Registered Whose Identities Didn't Match Corresponding State Identification | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The Wisconsin state auditors were tasked with performing an audit of the 2020 Election in the state. Although the audit work performed would never address all the issues and fraudulent activities that occurred in the 2020 Election due to the manner in which the audit was performed, the audit did...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

We also noted that 44,000 in Wisconsin voted that never provided proof of ID.

Wisconsin Election Group Findings: 44,272 Voted WITHOUT Proof Of ID - While Margin Of Victory Only About 20,000 | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Wisconsin election investigation found the number of resident who voted without proof of ID more than doubles the margin of victory in the state.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

But these items will no doubt be ignored by Wisconsin Republican leaders who, like others in swing states, didn’t want to see President Trump reelected. They did all they could to ignore the fraud in their states.

Now the Wisconsin Senate is wanting to save face. They announced today that they were going to initiate an audit of the 2020 Election.

Wisconsin Republicans plan to launch another investigation of the 2020 election.

Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu announced Monday that GOP leaders will authorize the Senate elections committee to probe election administration in the wake of findings legislative auditors released Friday.

The NWO Report shares:

Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu says probe prompted by audit bureau probe finding numerous failures in the election.

There will be more questions from lawmakers in Madison as to just what happened before and during last year’s election.

Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu on Monday announced that the State Senate is launching its own investigation into the 2020 election.

“The audit released on [Friday] paints a grim picture of the Wisconsin Election Commission and their careless administration of election law in Wisconsin,” LeMahieu said in a statement. “The audit shows numerous failures within WEC which undermined the free, fair, and transparent elections Wisconsinites deserve.”

That audit found numerous problems with voter roll accuracy, absentee voting, the use of drop boxes, and raised questions about the role of outside groups like the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life.

Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) said his Joint Audit Committee will hold hearings and lead an investigation.

There’s no indication that any members of the Senate and only a couple in the House want to really get to the bottom of the 2020 Election. These politicians must have been fine with Hillary Clinton not handing over her emails to the DOJ in 2016. The problem is that the entire country saw that on Election Night 140,000 ballots dropped for Joe Biden which were needed for Joe Biden to overcome President Trump’s lead in the state.

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Uncovered Email Shows Milwaukee Elections Executive Woodall-Vogg Laughing About the Election Steal on Election Night | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

In the early hours of November 4th in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a batch of 143,379 ballots, all for Joe Biden were dropped. We’ve unearthed an email that shows the culprits behind the ‘drop’ were laughing about it.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

These politicians are fine with this and just don’t seem to realize that most Americans are not. Until someone digs into the election fraud in Milwaukee, there will be no justice in Wisconsin.

 

[marsh]

Multiple Attorney Generals To File w/SCOTUS To Decertify

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell promised to get a case about election fraud before the Supreme Court prior to Thanksgiving. Now

warroom.org

Multiple Attorney Generals To File w/SCOTUS To Decertify
October 26, 2021

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell promised to get a case about election fraud before the Supreme Court prior to Thanksgiving. Now he says several state attorney generals (up to 20) will file a suit directly with the Supreme Court at 9 a.m. on Nov. 23. “War Room” host Steve Bannon has a healthy skepticism about it, but he asked Lindell how he is sure the lawsuit is not a “fantasy” when all previous lawsuits have been thrown out for lack of standing.

Lindell: “I’m not a lawyer. I know it has something to do with our Fourth and 12th Amendment. … All the lawyers have told me it would be unconstitutional for them not to accept it. So I really believe like I’ve said all along that they will accept it. It will be a 9-0 vote for them to accept it. We have found so much more evidence. Realize, they’ve never seen any of this evidence before…”

Whether he is right or not about the outcome, one thing you have to say about Mike Lindell, he doesn’t give up without a fight!

Rumble video on website 6:39 min

 

[marsh]

Voting Laws Broken In Maricopa County Likely Broken In Other Places 5:50 min

Voting Laws Broken In Maricopa County Likely Broken In Other Places
Bannons War Room Published October 26, 2021

 

[marsh]

THE BIG STEAL BREAKDOWN: Democrat Group Claims Low Income Voters Increased Turnout by 15 Percentage Points in 2020 with HUGE Turnouts in Battleground States to Give Joe Biden the 'Win' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In 2020 President Trump won more votes than any sitting president in US history.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

THE BIG STEAL BREAKDOWN: Democrat Group Claims Low Income Voters Increased Turnout by 15 Percentage Points in 2020 with HUGE Turnouts in Battleground States to Give Joe Biden the ‘Win’

By Jim Hoft
Published October 27, 2021 at 7:40am

In 2020 President Trump won more votes than any sitting president in US history.

Trump increased his vote totals by 12 million votes in 2020 over 2016.

Joe Biden won a record low number of counties in the United States by a supposed “winner” – only 16%.

But Trump improved in EVERY category.

** President Trump won more Hispanic votes.
** President Trump won more female votes.
** Trump won more black votes.
** President Trump won more gay votes.
** President Trump won more immigrant votes.

But somehow Democrat Joe Biden, who did not campaign and can barely string two sentences together, supposedly won 81 million votes.

The same guy who can’t get 20 people to come out and see him when he travels around the US.

How they did it–

We now know Democrats used several means to score illegal votes in several states. We witnessed them counting ballots behind closed doors, bringing in endless piles of ballots days after the election, locking Republicans out of the counting rooms, pulling boxes of ballots out from under tables when all the observers were sent home, driving in vanloads of ballots in the early hours of the morning after Joe Biden fell far behind.

And now we have another clue on how they stole the election and who they stole their votes from.

As we reported earlier, The Huffington Post recently credited “low-income voters” with giving Joe Biden the win.

This is preposterous on its face since everyone knows Trump connected to working-class voters like no other president in the last 100 years.

Democrats Reveal BIG CLUE in the BIG STEAL: Operatives Manufactured Votes from Low Income Voters to Steal the Battleground States -- Start the Canvassing! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In 2020 President Trump won more votes than any sitting president in US history.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Take a ride outside the city in any state and you STILL see Trump flags. Donald Trump had enormous appeal — more than any president in the last 100 years!

Everyone knows Trump won over the low-income and middle-income voters.

After all, these voters saw their incomes increase by at least 10% during the Trump years.

The Gateway Pundit dug a little bit further into this report on how Democrats “won” the 2020 election.

The original report was published by The Poor People’s Campaign, a radical far left group that promotes Marxism in America’s poor mostly inner-city communities.


WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT: … by Jim Hoft Scribd doc on website
Download this PDF

In the report, the authors claim the low income voters came out in droves for Joe Biden.

We all know this is a complete lie.

In fact, the authors claim low-income voter turnout increased 15 percentage points from 2016 to 2020 — from 58% turnout to 73% turnout.

And more importantly, the authors claim the low income voters came out in droves for Joe Biden in the battleground states.

According to the study low-income voters make up 35% of the total percent of US voters.

Yet in battleground states the low-income voters made up a significant percentage of the total votes counted.

page 2

These are the votes that need to be canvassed. These are the Americans who had their votes stolen.

Courageous and honest Americans must act now to expose the fraud in the voter subgroup.

The future of the country depends on it.