CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“Continuous Need For Boosting” – Moderna Chairman Says Yearly Covid Boosters May be Required (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published October 26, 2021 at 12:53pm
IMG_6885-2.jpg


There may be a need for endless Covid booster shots according to Moderna Chairman Noubar Afeyan.

“It may well need an annual booster, potentially varying on a year-to-year or every few years basis as the virus varies,” Afeyan told Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo.

“We just don’t know how this virus is going to travel from being a pandemic all the way to potentially an endemic virus we have to get used to living with,” he said.

“I think if we end up there, there will be a continuous need for boosting,” he added.

VIDEO:

Video on website 8:21 min

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky last Friday said the US may change its definition of “fully vaccinated” as booster shots become available for everybody.

“Should people who are eligible for a booster now get one by a certain time frame to maintain their fully vaccinated status?” a reporter for the Associated Press asked Fauci and Walensky last week.

“We have not yet changed the definition of ‘fully vaccinated.’ We will continue to look at this. We may need to update our definition of ‘fully vaccinated’ in the future,” Walensky said.

Americans will be forced to get Covid booster shots every year in order to work and travel.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Joe Rogan: “By the way, 200 Congress People Have Been Treated with Ivermectin for COVID” (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published October 26, 2021 at 2:15pm
joe-rogan-ivermectin.jpg

Joe Rogan continued to promote the use of Ivermectin for treating the coronavirus.

Last week Rogan told his audience that Dr. Pierre Kory from FLCCC treated him and 200 members of Congress with monoclonal antibodies, prednisone, Z-pak, NAD, vitamins, and ivermectin.
Joe Rogan: Dr. Pierre Kory, who one of the doctors from the Frontline Critical Care Group that has been treating people, including by the way, 200 congresspeople have been treated with ivermectin for COVID. Did you know that? Yeah. Google that!
The elites will HATE that!

Rumble video on website 1:40 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“Republicans Are Opposed to These Vaccine Mandates – This is Government Overreach at Its Worst” – Rep. Elise Stefanic BLASTS Democrats Over Unconstitutional and Wreckless Mandates (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published October 26, 2021 at 3:25pm
stefanik-mandates.jpg


House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) joined Harris Faulkner on The Faulkner Focus on Tuesday.

Stefanik stressed to Harris Faulkner that this republic was based on freedoms and “Republicans are going to stand up for those freedoms!”
Rep. Stefanik: “These vaccine mandates, whether on a federal level or some of our Democratic governors are putting into place, they’re unconstitutional and illegal. In my home state of New York, you talked about Harris on how we could see massive shortages. We’re already seeing shortages in New York with our unconstitutional mandate. I represent a hospital in my district in a rural region, Lewis County.
They’re no longer able to deliver babies because of this vaccine mandate. Our workers, whether they are our doctors, our nurses, our first responders, our law enforcement officers. They put their lives on the line during the COVID pandemic. And now these mandates are forcing them out of a job. Whether they choose not to get the vaccine, that is their personal choice… Republicans are opposed to these top-down mandates. This is government overreach at its worst… And what was most frustrating and telling for me to hear from the president of the United States is he mocked Americans for standing up for their freedoms. This country is based upon freedoms and Republicans will defend freedom.”
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1453028732713816073
1:16 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

FDA Panel Approves Pfizer Covid Vax For Kids Ages 5-11, Concedes it Doesn’t Know Long-Term Risks to Children (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published October 26, 2021 at 4:24pm
IMG_6892.jpg


The FDA’s panel of independent vaccine advisors on Tuesday voted 17-0 to recommend Pfizer’s Covid vaccine for children ages 5 to 11.

An advisory panel with the CDC is expected to approve the vaccine after a formal approval from the FDA.

Following the formal approval from the FDA and a stamp of approval from the CDC, the agency’s director, Rochelle Walensky will give a final approval.

Children could start getting their vaccines as early as next week.

Politico reported:
Data presented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at the panel’s meeting Tuesday showed that children ages 5-11 are “at least as likely” as adults to contract Covid-19, and surveillance testing suggests pediatric cases are widely underreported. Hospitalization rates also are three times higher for children of color than for white kids, highlighting racial disparities also seen among adult patients.

An FDA staff analysis released late Friday suggested the product’s benefits outweigh the risks of adverse side effects to kids. However, the document also noted that balance could change if Covid case rates again fell to those seen in June, depending on the extent to which instances of myocarditis — an inflammatory heart condition linked to messenger RNA vaccines — occur in that age group.
Children are at virtually zero risk from dying of Covid and the FDA admitted they don’t know the long term risks to children.

“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it,” one of the FDA’s voting members said on Tuesday.

VIDEO:
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1453095851824459776
.07 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1lxnfQP-Gk
.40 min
VAERS Facts

Oct 26, 2021


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Get the facts about VAERS.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m29-VsYXU98
1:59 min

How to Use COVID Data Tracker
Oct 26, 2021

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
How to Use COVID Data Tracker

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzB6uCEKaRE
.42 min

We can do it! We can stop COVID-19
Oct 26, 2021


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)


Together we can stop COVID-19 by wearing a mask, staying at least 6 feet apart, washing our hands or using hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol, and getting a COVID-19 vaccine. Transcript: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-... This video can also be viewed at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-...
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Z9Uht3p5o8
3:07 min

Multiple Myeloma: How Co-Morbidities Can Impact Vaccine Efficacy for COVID 19

Oct 26, 2021


MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY


Roger Seheult, MD of MedCram illustrates how pre-existing conditions such as multiple myeloma that Colin Powell had, can impact coronavirus vaccines. Roger Seheult, MD is the co-founder and lead professor at https://www.medcram.com He is Board Certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine and an Associate Professor at the University of California, Riverside School of Medicine. (This video was recorded on October 26, 2021)
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BREAKING: Governor Inslee [WA state] to mandate COVID vaccination for all private businesses

This package, which is an extension of current mandates, grants Inslee the ability to enforce COVID vaccine mandates on all private businesses in the state of Washington and extends Inslee's emergency powers.

BREAKING: Governor Inslee to mandate COVID vaccination for all private businesses

Katie DaviscourtSeattle, WA
October 25, 2021 8:59 PM3 Mins Reading

The Washington Department or Labor and Industries (L&I) filed an emergency rulemaking package last week extending emergency powers to Democrat Governor Jay Inslee. This package, which is an extension of current mandates, grants Inslee the ability to enforce COVID vaccine mandates on all private businesses in the state of Washington, according to elected officials.

Washington state house representatives Jim Walsh (R-Aberdeen) and Jesse Young (R-Gig Harbor) released a statement on Monday condemning the actions of L&I.

"This mandate from L&I demonstrates a complete lack of transparency, which dilutes public trust in our government and fails to show the agency's good faith in promulgating the rule. The reality is this move by L&I is a blank check for the agency to enforce any of the Governor's mandates or edicts on private employers."

"If L&I desires to make such a rule, it should do so in an open and transparent manner that allows public review and comment. Even if an opportunity for review and comment is not afforded the public, L&I's website should host the proposed rulemaking to grant easy access to the public," they continued. "Furthermore, adopting such a broad, vague rule without clear direction will lead to arbitrary enforcement."

Walsh and Young questioned the ethics of Labor and Industries and said the department cannot demonstrate that it "exercised honestly" to arrive at the rules granted to Governor Inslee.

"There is no clear case for 'good cause' or 'the preservation of the public health, safety, or general welfare' as the governor's proclamation already addresses these issues, making L&I's mandate arbitrary and capricious," the representatives added. "We call on the governor to immediately repeal this mandate. If L&I wants to push this policy, it needs to go through the proper channels and work with the Legislature."

Last week, Walsh announced on Facebook that he had been was locked out of buildings on the Capitol campus in Olympia for failing to provide proof of COVID-19 vaccination.

In the video Walsh said, "...this is not legal and it's not moral. We are absolutely falling into some sort of Stockholm Syndrome that's taken a hold of the legislature here in Olympia. And rather than being that active check against the Governor’s abuses, we're following the Governor's lead. That's not what we're supposed to be doing. We're supposed to be standing up to that and representing you and giving you a voice in the John L O'Brien building or over there under the dome."

Inslee issued a vaccine mandate in August and unlike other mandates across the country, provided no option to test-out. His message was crystal clear, obey or lose your job. Despite mass protests across the state with thousands of state workers in attendance, Inslee followed through on his orders and terminated thousands that decided not to comply.

1635289972836.png
Those affected by the first wave of vaccine mandates were state and city workers including; firefighters, law enforcement officers, healthcare workers, public and private school employees, power line workers, caregivers, etc.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1450569070827368454
.27 min

Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan imposed a near identical mandate with the same October 18 deadline as the Governor and terminated essential employees in departments that are already understaffed, like the Seattle Police and Fire Department.

As of Monday, October 25, Washington state residents living in King County, which includes Seattle, are required to show proof of vaccination or a negative COVID test to enter establishments including restaurants, bars, gyms, movie theaters, and other entertainment venues.

If Inslee follows through on L&I's emergency rulemaking package, all businesses and employees in the state of Washington will be subjected to submitting proof of vaccination as a condition of employment.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Health Care Workers Speak Out on Why They Would Rather Lose Their Jobs Than Take a COVID-19 Vaccine

By Enrico Trigoso
October 25, 2021 Updated: October 26, 2021

Despite the COVID-19 vaccines having been promoted as safe and effective by legacy media, many health care workers are refusing to take them, and those who openly speak out about their concerns get censored by Big Tech companies or kicked off their platforms.

Some nurses and doctors are refusing vaccine mandates even if their refusal will cost them their jobs.

The Epoch Times reached out to some of these health care professionals to see why.

‘Impossible to Give Fully Informed Consent’
Emily Nixon is a registered nurse who has been working in the health industry for 18 years. When her employer, MaineHealth, announced that it would make the vaccine mandatory, she quickly organized a group called The Coalition for Healthcare Workers Against Medical Mandates and filed a lawsuit.'

“Thousands of health care workers have and will be losing their jobs. The already weak health care infrastructure of Maine will not withstand this devastating loss of staff. Life will be lost. Care is already being rationed. We have been experiencing a media blackout in this state,” Nixon said.

“Speaking from my point of view, an intelligent, healthy, and empowered health care professional that takes excellent care of herself, it is an insult to expect that I would accept an injection of unknown substance and efficacy and provide an example to the great people that I serve that they too should submit their power over to pharmaceutical companies—convicted felons—in an effort to put a band-aid on the gaping wound of reality.

“It is unconscionable to mandate injections without exemption, especially when the injection is a brand new medical product still undergoing its first year of study. Breakthrough cases are not properly reported on. We know this vaccine is ‘leaky.’ The safety and effectiveness of this vaccine has not been proven. There are other safe and alternative treatments. It is impossible to give fully informed consent without long-term, unbiased data. Threatening our jobs is blatant coercion. Our God-given right to bodily integrity and personal autonomy has been stripped with these mandates and we will not stand for it,” Nixon said.

‘The Side Effects Are Real’
Jaclyn Zubiate, who was working for Southern Maine Health Care, loved her job as a nurse practitioner.

“I did not take the vaccine, even though I will be terminated … Now with the data that we have, we know that the survival rate is quite high. Over the last 18 months, I have only sent one patient to the ER in respiratory distress. COVID has no distinguishing features among other viruses like other diseases that we have vaccines for. Why would I need a vaccine for something with a 99 percent survival rate that does not have any distinguishable features?” said Zubiate.

“Health care workers are not taking it because they know that the side effects are real. In urgent care, I have seen myocarditis, cellulitis, [and] unusual neurological symptoms, among a variety of other side effects. I have seen people very ill post-vaccine, and then go on to test positive. The positivity rate for contracting COVID on the vaccinated is very high per the recent studies and what I am seeing in my clinic. A vaccine should work, and it is not working. It should be tested for years on something other than humans before we call it ‘safe and effective.’ There have been over 15,000 deaths from the vaccine that the media is not talking about. I will never take that risk on myself,” Zubiate said.

‘The Data Speaks for Itself’
Jessica Mosher has been a registered nurse for more than a decade. She is a mother of four and a veteran of the United States Navy who lost her job for refusing the shots.

She was a nursing supervisor, patient observer manager, and nurse program director at Redington-Fairview General Hospital.

“Protecting my health and staying true to my religious convictions will always be my choice over a job. The scriptures promise that ‘as long as the earth remains, there will be seedtime and harvest’; this side of heaven, we have an abundance of employment options, but only one life,” Mosher said.

“I have a master’s degree in nursing and am employed as a professor of nursing research and evidence-based practice. I am skilled in collecting and analyzing data and in drawing conclusions. I did not rely on the media, government, or Big Tech for any of my health care decisions prior to COVID-19 and I have no plans to change course. The data speaks for itself related to the harm these experimental vaccines have caused and the lack of studies that have been conducted.

“What I have seen as a nurse and what others have shared post-vaccination seals the deal. The virus, like the cold and flu, does not have a cure. However, it has an almost 100 percent survival rate. Those pushing the vaccine are following the money. I am following the science. Health care workers do not walk away from their passion or stable salary to be difficult. The amount of people willing to be fired should be cause for alarm in and of itself,” she said.

‘Health Care Workers Have Natural Immunity
John Lewis worked for a large hospital in southern Maine.

He is pro-life and believes that all life is precious.

“Knowing all three available vaccines were either tested, developed, or produced using fetal cell lines from elective abortions, I could not in good conscience violate my deeply held beliefs. Anticipating I would be able to file a religious exemption, it is hard to accept [that] I’m not being afforded an exemption based on my duties after considering I am a remote worker and do not interact with patients,” Lewis said.

“Outside of medical or religious exemptions, many health care workers consider the risk-benefits of getting the vaccine. It is the same approach to providing patient care, where the patient is allowed informed consent. Many of the health care workers have natural immunity. Others do not feel there is enough long-term research into adverse effects. Also, these health care workers see with their own eyes what is happening in hospitals, which isn’t necessarily in line with the narrative,” Lewis said.

‘None of Us Are Seeing’ Surges
Heather Sadler, a registered nurse, also loves to be a nurse, but she said that her and her family’s health are much more important than her paycheck.

“This is new vaccine (if you want to call it that) technology that has NEVER been deployed successfully, and has no data regarding long-term effects, not to be confused with ‘side effects’ as the general public seems to be hung up on. I have
always been someone who analyzes my health care choices through the lens of risk-benefit ratio. Knowing what I know about COVID (and I’ve done a lot of research), I do not fall into any of the high-risk for severe illness/death categories: age over 65, obese, heart disease, diabetes, chronic lung conditions, and immunocompromised. For me and my immediate family, there is greater risk of having a side effect, or long-term effect from injecting a virtually unknown substance into ourselves,” Sadler said.

“I am a nurse in Oncology/Hematology, and I’m seeing that we are experiencing an increase in hospitalizations/referrals for clotting and bleeding disorders. For one example, in one week, we had two patients in the hospital who were diagnosed with a rare clotting disorder … And this happened twice in one week in rural central Maine. The only common factor, a COVID shot three days prior in each case. Was this reported to the CDC? I do not know.

“Only 4 of the roughly 20 to 25 people I’ve known personally who have tested positive for COVID recently have been unvaccinated. Yes, unvaccinated. The majority of the people around me who have tested positive in the past three months have been fully vaccinated. Why would I want to risk side effects or long-term effects of the shot if I can still contract and spread this virus? It’s just not logical. Those two examples clearly blow their theory that ‘it’s safe and effective’ out of the water,” Sadler said.

“I am in constant communication with other health care workers in the state of Maine and none of us are seeing the ‘surges’ that the general public is told is happening.”

“This is America! I have every right to make an educated decision regarding my health care. No matter what you are told, what I do has no direct effect on you,” Sadler said.

‘Freedom Is the Most Important Thing’
Sherri Thornton was a Maine SAFE Advisory Board member and chair and has been a nurse for 45 years.

She was planning to retire but wanted to work until the end of the year; however, when she saw the mandate coming, she decided to retire earlier.

“I believe that freedom is the most important thing in life outside of salvation.

No one has the right to tell me what I can or can not do with my body except the Lord. The vaccines have been produced with fetal tissue, and I am staunchly opposed to abortion,” Thornton said.

“The components of the vaccines are not safe. There are many side effects that cause more harm than the coronavirus. It doesn’t protect against the variants. … Vaccinating everyone will not gain herd immunity and will only cause more variants to which those without natural immunity will succumb,” Thornton said.

Three other health care workers that are against the vaccine mandates reached out to The Epoch Times but didn’t want to have their names or employers disclosed.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Breaking — FDA Advisory Panel votes 17-0 to recommend Pfizer Vaccine for children ages 5+…
Posted by Kane on October 26, 2021 6:35 pm

1635291222349.png
FDA panel members voted 17-0 to recommend the shot, with one abstention.

The endorsement by the agency’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will now be considered by the FDA, which could issue a final decision within days.

Next week, a CDC vaccine advisory group is expected to make its own recommendation. If it issues an endorsement and CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky signs off, clotshots for young kids could begin immediately.

The Biden administration said it plans to distribute the doses as soon as it’s authorized by the FDA and CDC, which is expected to come early next month. The administration said it’s procured enough vaccine to inoculate all 28 million 5- to 11-year-olds in the U.S., and will distribute it in smaller dosing and with smaller needles to make it easier for pediatricians and pharmacists to administer to kids.

Children ages 5 to 11 account for roughly 9% of all reported Covid cases in the U.S., according to data presented to the committee by the FDA on Tuesday.

Still, some parents and advocacy groups argue Covid vaccinations for children are unnecessary as studies show kids are less likely to experience symptoms from the disease.

Some committee members said Tuesday that vaccinating younger groups would help the U.S. move toward Covid’s “endemic” phase, where the virus is still circulating but at lower levels than it is now. Others noted there are still unknowns, like the rate of myocarditis in young kids, but still emphasized the benefits of the shots outweighed the risks.

One member wondered whether they should issue a recommendation only for at-risk children.

“We don’t want children to be dying from Covid, even if it is far fewer children than adults and we don’t want them in the ICU,” member Dr. Amanda Cohn said before the vote. Prior to the vote, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA’s top vaccine regulator, asked committee members to keep today’s debate “civil,” saying there were strong feelings on both sides.

“To be clear, today’s discussion is going to be about the scientific data that are presented, and it’s not about vaccine mandates which are left to other entities outside of FDA,” Marks said at the top of the meeting. “I ask that we keep our discourse today civil and focus on the science related to this issues so that we can get through a productive discussion.”

Pfizer asked the FDA to authorize its vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11 on Oct. 7. The company published data that showed a two-dose regimen of 10 micrograms — a third of the dosage used for teens and adults – is safe and generates a strong immune response in a clinical trial of young children.

It said the shots were well tolerated and produced an immune response and side effects comparable with those seen in a study of people ages 16 to 25.

Dr. Doran Fink, a deputy director of the FDA’s division of vaccines, said Tuesday a “small army” of FDA staff worked around the clock over the last month to ensure the data on kids they were presenting today was as accurate as possible.

The staff of the FDA published an analysis late Friday, saying a smaller dosage of the Pfizer vaccine appears to be safe and highly effective in young kids. They noted the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis but said the benefits of the shots, including preventing severe disease, hospitalization and death, would generally outweigh the risk of the rare inflammatory heart conditions.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Vaccine mandate could be delayed for 3 months…
Posted by Kane on October 26, 2021 6:10 pm

CNBC

Worried that Joe Biden’s Covid vaccine mandate for private companies could cause a mass exodus of employees, business groups are pleading with the White House to delay the rule until after the holiday season.

White House officials at the Office of Management and Budget held dozens of meetings with labor unions, industry lobbyists and private individuals last week as the administration conducts its final review of the mandate, which will require businesses with 100 or more employees to ensure they are vaccinated against Covid or tested weekly for the virus. It is estimated to cover roughly two-thirds of the private sector workforce.

OMB officials have several meetings lined up Monday and Tuesday with groups representing dentists, trucking companies, staffing companies and realtors, among others.

The American Trucking Associations, which will meet with the OMB on Tuesday, warned the administration last week that many drivers will likely quit rather than get vaccinated, further disrupting the national supply chain at time when the industry is already short 80,000 drivers.

The trucking association estimates companies covered by the mandate could lose 37% of drivers through retirements, resignations and workers switching to smaller companies not covered by the requirements.

“Now placing vaccination mandates on employers, which in turn force employees to be vaccinated, will create a workforce crisis for our industry and the communities, families and businesses we serve,” Chris Spear, the association’s president and CEO, wrote in a letter to the OMB last Thursday.

Retailers are also particularly concerned the mandate could trigger a spike in resignations that would exacerbate staffing problems at businesses already short on people.

“It has been a hectic holiday season already, as you know, with supply chain struggles. This is a difficult policy to implement. It would be even more difficult during the holiday season.”

Thirty percent of unvaccinated workers said they would leave their jobs rather than comply with a vaccine or testing mandate, according to a KFF poll published last month. Goldman Sachs, in an analysis published in September, said the mandate could hurt the already tight labor market. However, it said survey responses are often exaggerated and not as many people will actually quit.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration delivered its final rule to the OMB on Oct. 12, and the mandate is expected to take effect soon after the agency completes its review.

The National Retail Federation, the trucking association and the retail leaders group are asking White House officials to give businesses 90 days to comply with the mandate, delaying implementation until late January at the earliest.

Continue reading…
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[Australia]

Children in Melbourne fined $80 for failure to wear mask…
Posted by Kane on October 26, 2021 12:25 pm

1635292680163.png1635292728950.png
In Australian state of Victoria children under the age of 15 years old will now be fined $40 for failure to wear a mask and the penalty rises to $80 for those between 15-18.

The penalties are worse for breaking Covid-19 directions. Teenagers under the age of 18 can be fined up to $800 dollars for breaching these ever-shifting rules dictated by the whims of Dan Andrews.

Full details here…

View: https://youtu.be/Fb5DYNVBft4
3:51 min

View: https://youtu.be/tXH7ZAVjQmY
2:52 min

1635292860708.png1635292906973.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Consensus REACHED: An Astounding 91 Clinical Research Studies ALL CONFIRMED That NATURAL IMMUNITY Provides Same, If Not Better Protection Against the Virus Than Covid-19 Vaccines – Infection Rate Remained at “Almost ZERO” Among Previously Infected Individuals

By Julian Conradson
Published October 26, 2021 at 7:20pm

Screenshot_20210922-181152_Twitter.jpg

The verdict is in.

As has been the case for the past 100 years of modern medicine, natural immunity has – once again – been affirmed to provide more complete and longer-lasting immunity than lab-created vaccines.

This week, the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research published a list of 91 different clinical research studies which each conclude that naturally acquired immunity is at the very least equal to, but in many cases vastly superior, to the experimental mRNA vaccines that are currently available. Every single one of the studies was conducted over the past year and a half and specifically analyzed natural immunity in relation to the Covid-19 outbreak that originated in China.

The results are shocking. In just one study that looked at “52,238 employees in an American healthcare system,” researchers found that the reinfection rate among individuals who had recovered from Covid-19, even if they had gone on to get the vaccine after recovering, was “almost zero.”

Most notably, of the almost 1,400 “previously infected subjects” who had never received a Covid-19 vaccine, not a single one was reinfected with the virus. The data was so clear that researchers concluded vaccination is “unlikely to benefit” individuals with natural immunity.

According to “Necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in previously infected individuals,” published on June 5th, 2021:
“Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was examined among 52,238 employees in an American healthcare system. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection remained almost zero among previously infected unvaccinated subjects, previously infected subjects who were vaccinated, and previously uninfected subjects who were vaccinated, compared with a steady increase in cumulative incidence among previously uninfected subjects who remained unvaccinated.
Not one of the 1359 previously infected subjects who remained unvaccinated had a SARS-CoV-2 infection over the duration of the study. Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination…”
The results are backed up by all 91 of the other studies in some way or another. In addition to thoroughly demonstrating the efficacy of natural immunity, several of the studies also provided other shocking revelations. Some of the most notable findings include:

From SARS-CoV-2 re-infection risk in Austria, Pub, 2021:
“Protection against SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection is comparable with the highest available estimates on vaccine efficacies.

Additionally, hospitalization in only five out of 14,840 (0.03%) people and death in one out of 14,840 (0.01%) (tentative re-infection).”
In other words, this study found that individuals who had natural immunity have a 99.99% chance of not dying, and a 99.97% chance of having a mild case that does not require hospitalization – so much for the vaccine’s 90-95% efficacy rate for those two grim measurements.

From Persistence of neutralizing antibodies a year after SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans, Pub, 2021
“Assessed the persistence of serum antibodies following WT SARS-CoV-2 infection at 8 and 13 months after diagnosis in 367 individuals…found that NAb against the WT virus persisted in 89% and S-IgG in 97% of subjects for at least 13 months after infection.”
In case there was any doubt that natural immunity also provides long-lasting protection, this study demonstrates how 89-97% of subjects still had antibodies for ‘at least’ 13 months after their initial Covid diagnosis. Contrast that with the vaccine, which has been proven to provide less and less antibodies as time progresses – Why else would you need perpetual booster shots?

And finally, from “Protection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is similar to that of BNT162b2 vaccine protection: A three-month nationwide experience from Israel,” Pub, 2021
“The overall estimated level of protection from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for documented infection is 94·8% (CI: [94·4, 95·1]); hospitalization 94·1% (CI: [91·9, 95·7]); and severe illness 96·4% (CI: [92·5, 98·3])…results question the need to vaccinate previously-infected individuals.”
This study that analyzed the ‘entire population’ of Israel – one of the most vaccinated countries in the world – also demonstrates the robust protection against severe cases of Covid that comes along with natural immunity.

Researchers found that vaccines actually provided LESS protection, albeit slightly, against spreading the virus (92.8% for vaccine compared to 94.8 for natural) and severe illness (94.4% vaccine vs. 96.4% natural).

These findings were also backed up by a separate study out of Israel that showed how vaccinated individuals are 13x more likely to have a breakthrough infection and more likely to be hospitalized when compared to those who had already recovered from the virus.

There are 85+ more detailed examples with the data to back it up – but we will leave it there for now. The full list of studies can be found at the bottom.

For the past year and a half, public health officials and their bootlickers in the politicized media have been intentionally misleading the public, claiming that their rushed vaccines will provide better immunity than if someone has recovered from the virus. One of the most glaring examples of this deception was when the director of the CDC – Rachel Walensky – issued a statement that denied the existence of natural immunity to Covid-19 last October.

She also shamelessly attempted to fearmonger, saying that the unvaccinated would be a “risk” to “vulnerable” Americans even if they had gained natural immunity.


From Walensky’s LANCET statement:
There is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection.

The consequence of waning immunity would present a risk to vulnerable populations for the indefinite future.
Despite several of the nearly 100 studies having been completed since her October 2020 statement, Walensky has dutifully held the line and ignored all of the data so the left can further their agenda. Recently, she has advocated for masking all children in schools and announced the Biden administration’s plans to “educate” unvaccinated workers. She also announced the CDC’s plans to change the agency’s definition of “fully vaccinated” once booster shots become widely available.

Thanks to the mass politicization of this virus, these authoritarian psychopaths continue to ram through their woke, radical agenda and dystopian public health policies, while ignoring or burying any information that contradicts their agenda along the way – and with absolutely NO credibility.

The benefits of natural immunity have been confirmed over and over again for the past century, so much so that the Brownstone Institute refers to the research as “Immunology and Virology 101.” Even the CDC acknowledges that the benefits of recovery outweigh vaccines for a whole host of other viral infections, such as measles, chickenpox, rubella, and mumps, but the agency has made no such assertations about Covid-19.

Not only have the recent studies demonstrated natural immunity’s superiority to the vaccines, but several also showed that the vaccinated are actually carrying ‘viral loads’ that are similar to those who are unvaccinated and have not recovered from the virus.

In other words, the research is showing that the vaccinated are just as infectious – spreading the virus at the same rate as if they had never received the jab.

According to the Brownstone Institute, who included links to each corresponding study:
The vaccinated are showing viral loads (very high) similar to the unvaccinated (Acharya et al. and Riemersma et al.), and the vaccinated are as infectious.

Riemersma et al. also report Wisconsin data that corroborate how the vaccinated individuals who get infected with the Delta variant can potentially (and are) transmit(ting) SARS-CoV-2 to others (potentially to the vaccinated and unvaccinated).

This troubling situation of the vaccinated being infectious and transmitting the virus emerged in seminal nosocomial outbreak papers by Chau et al. (HCWs in Vietnam), the Finland hospital outbreak (spread among HCWs and patients), and the Israel hospital outbreak (spread among HCWs and patients). These studies also revealed that the PPE and masks were essentially ineffective in the healthcare setting.
The painstakingly thorough research conducted across these 91 studies has clearly demonstrated that existing immunity through recovery from Covid-19 should be taken into account when an individual makes the decision to remain unvaccinated, but it’s not – instead, Americans are required to receive both jabs, and soon a booster, before they are considered ‘fully vaccinated’ and able to engage in everyday society.

As more and more evidence comes out that validates people choosing to not take the jab, those who refuse for any reason are still castigated as ‘conspiracy theorists,’ and the authoritarian vaccine mandate deadlines continue to creep closer.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans will soon be forced to choose between their freedom or being able to feed their families, even though they have the same, if not better protection against the virus to those who have taken the experimental jab.

Exactly what science are these people following?

Here is the full list of 91 studies that affirm natural immunity to Covid-19, Published by The Brownstone Institute and up to date as of 10/15/21:

Read the rest on the website here: Consensus REACHED: An Astounding 91 Clinical Research Studies ALL CONFIRMED That NATURAL IMMUNITY Provides Same, If Not Better Protection Against the Virus Than Covid-19 Vaccines - Infection Rate Remained at "Almost ZERO" Among Previously Infected Individuals
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

NIH Director Shredded Over Risky Research In Wuhan After CNN Interview Goes Sideways

TUESDAY, OCT 26, 2021 - 02:10 PM
While most corporate media outlets are throwing softballs at Dr. Anthony Fauci over revelations that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded risky gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China, Fauci's 'boss' - NIH Director Francis Collins - wasn't so lucky.



In a blistering Sunday night interview, CNN's Pamela Brown (credit where it's due) absolutely grilled Collins over the NIH's funding of New York-based nonprofit, EcoHealth alliance, which performed textbook Gain of Function research - genetically engineering bat coronaviruses so they can infect humans.

Last week the NIH admitted that EcoHealth violated the terms of a grant by failing to report their achievement (which EcoHealth denies), sending both Fauci and Collins into full damage control over the weekend.

Now, the official story is that while EcoHealth violated their contract, and are allegedly 'in trouble' for failing to report their achievement, the NIH and NIAID (Collins and Fauci) maintain that the research still wasn't risky enough to qualify for enhanced oversight.

CNN's Brown didn't let Collins get away with his carefully crafted talking points - repeatedly pressing him over what else the NIH may be funding that they don't know about, and asking why the American people should trust them after last week's revelation.

Breaking down the interview is Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin - who in March revealed in his book: "Chaos Under Heaven: Trump, Xi, and the Battle for the Twenty-First Century" that the (NIH) "had funded a number of projects that involved WIV scientists, including much of the Wuhan lab's work with bat coronaviruses." In April, Rogin revealed that in 2018, diplomats with the US State Department warned over safety issues at Wuhan labs studying bat COVID. In short - few journalists are as qualified as Rogin to opine on what's going on.

Jumping right into it (video at the bottom):

1635303209782.png

Continued via threadreaderapp (emphasis ours):

Brown repeatedly presses Collins to explain how NIH could not know FOR TWO YEARS that its own contractor @EcoHealthNYC had done research making bat coronaviruses more infectious to humans, and Collins uses every rhetoric trick to dissemble and distract... I'll explain...

Fauci claimed no "Gain of Function research was being funded in Wuhan.

Brown to Collins: “How could [Fauci] say that when you are just now finding out that US taxpayer dollars were being used to pay for this risky research in that Wuhan lab two years ago?" GOOD QUESTION

Collins tries to go down a rabbit hole semantic debate about the definition of gain of function (this is his usual filibuster tactic), but Brown stops him and asks the direct question again:

Brown: “EcoHealth Alliance violated the terms of its contract... So the question is.. How can you know what this money is going toward… in places the Wuhan lab if you are just now finding this out from EcoHealth Alliance, how the US taxpayer dollars were being used?" EXACTLY.

Collins acknowledges EcoHealth violated its contract but then says, weirdly:

"Yes, they did some things they should have told us about, but they did not do the kind of Gain of Function research that requires special, high level oversight." WTAF?

The whole point of the NIH letter to Congress was that if EcoHealth HAD reported its research results, it WOULD HAVE triggered the extra, high level oversight. Why is Collins pretending he knows they would have been exempt from that?

https://republicans-energycommerce.house.gov/news/energy-commerce-gop-l…

There's more...

Then Collins constructs and attacks a straw man by saying: “This was in no way connected with the advent of SARS-CoV-2."

Brown points out he's refuting an assertion nobody made. She steers the interview back to the issue at hand, why didn't NIH know what they were funding?

Brown: “There was risky research being conducted in that lab with US taxpayer dollars that NIH was unaware of and is just now finding out. So it raises the question of what other risky experiments could be going on with US taxpayer funding that you don't know about." PRECISELY

Collins responds he doesn't think this kind of lax reporting is widespread. "This particular grantee is in trouble for not being completely transparent about the work they were doing and we are very much following up on that.” No specifics.

Brown presses Collins (again) to acknowledge NIH has some responsibility for not knowing it was funding this research: “Isn’t this also an oversight failure of the NIH, because the NIH is responsible for taking taxpayer money and giving these grants." OF COURSE IT IS...

This time, Collins actually blames Congress for preventing NIH from interacting with sub=grantees (the Wuhan lab), completely sidestepping why NIH didn't ask EcoHealth (the primary grantee) for its Wuhan report FOR TWO YEARS, while a pandemic raged coming from Wuhan...

Brown presses Collins to on the core issue:“Why should Americans trust you and the NIH on the issue of covid origins, when you didn’t even know about the programs it was funding with taxpayer dollars in China?" LOGICAL QUESTION
First, Collins basically makes the argument that most of the planes landed safely so nothing to see here:

“Well, that’s a little too strong, Pam... The vast majority of what they did was what we gave them permission to do.”

Then Collins makes what seems to me to be a sexist comment to Brown

“So please, relax here." (seems sexist)

"This is not a circumstance where I think you could say there was a major failure that could put human lives at risk.” (A bold if not misleading assertion)
Brown stands her ground, defends her legitimate and sensible questions:

"It certainly raises questions about transparency and oversight by the NIH of where this grant money goes… Will the NIH now pull funding from EcoHealth Alliance?"

Collins misleads again, saying the EcoHealth funding in Wuhan was cut off (true) but neglecting to mention that NIH and NIAID have awarded EcoHealth Alliance millions more in other contracts since then for other stuff. Some accountability...

This Collins statement struck me as the most audacious:

"The last thing that needs to happen now is any sense that we are not revealing everything that we know.”

NIH is currently ignoring several Congressional requests for information and record about its work in China....

Brown ends with a simple and true statement:

“This is US taxpayer dollars going to risky research and I believe every American deserves to know about it.”

Amen.

END THREAD

Watch:
Rumble video on website 8:06 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Pediatric COVID Hospitalizations Plunge As Schools Reopen, Baffling Experts

TUESDAY, OCT 26, 2021 - 07:50 PM

All summer long, Dr. Anthony Fauci, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and other unelected federal bureaucrats have been warning that COVID cases will explode as soon as teachers and students return to classrooms in person this fall, which is why Dr. Fauci has been one of the loudest voices cheering on politicians like NYC's de Blasio and others who have imposed such mandates on teachers and school employees (which has since been expanded to cover most, if not all, city employees). But just as Pfizer, Moderna and their allies in the federal bureaucracy prepare to declare mRNA vaccines safe for all students between the age of 5 and 11, Bloomberg has just pointed out a remarkable shift: hospitalizations involving US children (already extremely rare compared with the adult population) have fallen sharply as schools reopen.


The number of children who have been hospitalized or died in the US due to COVID has remained extremely small: while the number of US minors who have been confirmed positive with COVID has numbered about 5MM since the start of the pandemic, fewer of 700 of those people have died. When it comes to hospitalizations, the difference between infected adults and children is pretty dramatic.


Source: USA Today

Despite this, many are pushing for children to also be required to get the vaccine as soon as it's approved for their age group (or face the same kind of alienation that their parents are currently being subjected to). The disagreements have turned communities against one another.

But while the Big Pharma machine gears up to shove vaccines down the throats of children and their parents, the phenomenon of falling hospital positions simply can't be ignored, even by the MSM, which is quite practiced at that particular skill.
Daily pediatric admissions with confirmed Covid have fallen 56% since the end of August to an average of about 0.2 per 100,000, according to Department of Health and Human Services data. Among adults, new admissions fell 54% to 2.1 per 100,000 in the same period, the data show.
Here's a visualization for those who prefer to be shown, not told.


(Source: Bloomberg)

It's no secret that America's school board meetings have transformed into battle grounds used by people either demanding masks be worn by students, and concerned parents who worry the masks will impact that education. Battles over vaccine mandates and whether CRT should be taught in school have also set off battles in communities across the country.

In some GOP-led states, schools have dropped their school-related mandates, sometimes under pressure from the governor. The Delta variant and its new sub-variant were supposed to trigger the worst phase of the outbreak yet. Instead, it looks like COVID numbers truly are moving down and staying down, especially in states like Florida, which were once heavily criticized for their lack of mandatory precaution.

Alarm bells went off during the spring when tthe CDC saw the percentage of children being hospitalized with COVID rise slightly. However, they eventually figured out that it was merely a factor of falling hospitalization numbers among adults as more Americans became "fully vaccinated".


Source: Bloomberg

Kid between 12 and 15 didn't have access to the jab until May. But Dr. Fauci has promised to vaccine all children as young as six months old as the end of the year. The question here, however, is who's really benefiting from this vaccine overkill? Big Pharma - certainly. But is America really benefiting? How about the developing world?

However, if you think this is the end of the push to vaccine every American with a pulse, there's already a big new scary variant on the horizon to help convince parents to change their minds.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen

Deborah Birx Rides Again With Ludicrous Claim About Trump and COVID-19

By Bonchie | Oct 26, 2021 7:45 PM ET

AUwMyvg.jpg


Remember Dr. Deborah Birx? While Dr. Anthony Fauci stole most of the spotlight the moment COVID-19 became a serious issue, Birx brought up the rear. She was often seen as the more reasonable and less political of the two. Of course, as a lifelong Democrat, such assumptions were always foolhardy. And as if to make sure no one suffered under that illusion, she recently appeared to make a ridiculous claim about Donald Trump and the coronavirus.

According to Birx, had measures she suggested been implemented earlier, 130,000 lives could have been saved. But the Bad Orange Man was just too focused on the election.

View: https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1453044476600102912?s=20


As the Washington Post reveals (without a fact-check):
Birx, who sat for interviews with the subcommittee on Oct. 12 and 13, also detailed advice that she said the White House ignored late last year, including more aggressively testing younger Americans, expanding access to virus treatments and better distributing vaccine doses in long-term care facilities.
More than 130,000 American lives could have been saved with swifter action and better coordinated public health messages after the virus’s first wave, Birx told investigators.
“I believe if we had fully implemented the mask mandates, the reduction in indoor dining, the getting friends and family to understand the risk of gathering in private homes, and we had increased testing, that we probably could have decreased fatalities into the 30-percent-less to 40-percent-less range,” Birx said.
Everything she’s saying here is pure supposition. By what evidence is she stating that we could have decreased fatalities by 30-40 percent? Where’s her statistical analysis? Like Fauci, Birx is notorious for just saying things while hiding behind her credentials, and her numbers here have no real backing at all.

But let’s game this out. Testing was already incredibly widespread by late last year, which is the period she’s talking about here. How would expanded testing of younger adults, who made up a small minority of total deaths, have saved over 130,000 lives? If the suggestion is that it would have somehow limited community spread, that seems incredibly unlikely given what we’ve seen in 2021.

As to the topic of pushing therapeutics, that was Trump’s main thrust aside from the vaccines. It was the media who chose to trash any and all treatments, including hydroxychloroquine, which is now proven to be somewhat effective if administered early enough. At the time, anything that could be seen as helping slow the pandemic was bad because it would be seen as helping Trump. Further, the president is not in charge of approving medication. In fact, any time Trump got within a mile of the bureaucracy handling that, he was accused of politicizing it. Birx’s criticism on that front simply doesn’t hold water.

Past that, her assertion about expanding vaccines into nursing homes makes no sense. The vaccine was not even widely available until January of 2021, and the administration did triage it to long-term care facilities as soon as it was possible to do so. Is she suggesting Trump didn’t get the vaccines out fast enough even as he was being accused at the time of rushing the vaccines? That’s very convenient, right?

Lastly, everything else she claims should have been implemented would be unconstitutional. There’s a reason not even Joe Biden himself has used the federal government to mandate masks and capacity requirements. Yet, even if that had occurred, we have plenty of evidence now that it wouldn’t have made a difference. The country has a terrible COVID-19 spike under Joe Biden despite him starting his presidency with multiple vaccines in hand. The claim that some silver bullet of testing in November of 2020 would have lowered fatalities by 30-40 percent is absolutely laughable and obviously political.

As an exit point, everything she’s saying is actually an indictment of Biden, isn’t it? I realize the House committee she spoke to just wanted dirt on Trump, but Biden was handed a far better situation than Trump and has produced far worse results in context. So where’s Birx’s criticism of the current president? I think we know why she’s staying mum on that.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[China]


China Braces For Another Major COVID Flareup By Forcing Jabs On Children As Young As 3

TUESDAY, OCT 26, 2021 - 06:30 PM

The notion - oft-repeated in western media - that China has successfully managed to bring COVID to heel using the tools unique to an authoritarian state couldn't be further from the truth. Earlier this month, leaked CCP documents revealed that China's leadership has commanded local officials to be on alert for another large-scale COVID outbreak, before ordering them to complete two tasks:
  • One is to build central isolation sites, with local authorities required by the end of October to create facilities of not less than 20 rooms per 10,000 people.
  • The second: the scale of each isolation site must be more than 100 rooms.
But that's not all. As outbreaks continue to flare up across the world's most populous country, Beijing has warned that local officials should prepare for COVID outbreaks flaring up in certain areas to get even worse in the coming days, and that the virus might spread to affect more cities in towns across China.



In an attempt to get ahead of the next major COVID wave (potentially driven by the delta variant or its "sub-variant" delta-plus) local media reports cited by Bloomberg attest that China has started giving COVID jabs to children as young as three, despite the fact that China has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, with 75% of its 1.4 billion people already vaccinated.
Multiple places across China are rolling out vaccines to children aged between three and 11, according to reports in local media. The shots, developed by homegrown drugmakers Sinovac Biotech Ltd and state-owned Sinopharm, have already been administered to those aged 12 and above, with the country green-lighting their use in those aged over three in June.
Compare this to the US, where President Biden (guided by his top advisor, Dr. Anthony Fauci) is pushing for FDA approval of jabs for children as young as 5 (recent data showed jabs are "safe" for children between ages of 5 and 11) by the end of the year (despite the fact that serious infections involving young, healthy children are extremely rare).

But China's decision to expand its vaccination program (with its own home-made vaccines that just aren't as effective as their foreign peers) comes as the CCP braces for another even more deadly round of COVID infections.

The moves come as China tries to quash what has become a 'whack-a-mole' series of flareups across its vast territory, with flareups of the virus coming more frequently than they did before delta arrived. Beijing remains committed to its "zero-tolerance" COVID strategy, which has kept its borders closed and heavy handed quarantines in place even as its peers roll back most of their COVID limitations.

In other words, let this be a warning: China has always been a step ahead when it comes to managing the virus that they unleashed upon the world. If they're taking these types of precautions, they're more than likely doing it for a reason.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

NYPD's Largest Police Union Sues Mayor Over COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

TUESDAY, OCT 26, 2021 - 05:30 PM
Submitted by the Epoch Times,

The largest New York City Police Department union on Monday filed a lawsuit to block a citywide COVID-19 vaccine mandate that’s slated to go into effect by the end of this month.


The Police Benevolent Association union sued over Mayor Bill de Blasio’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which goes into effect for all police officers and other city workers on Friday, Oct. 29.

“The City has provided no explanation, much less a rational one, for the need to violate the autonomy and privacy of NYPD police officers in such a severe manner, on the threat of termination,” the lawsuit said, adding that the current policy to either mandate vaccines or testing for COVID-19 is “sufficient enough.”

The current policy requires unvaccinated police officers to be tested weekly for COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

“There is no evidence of any widespread COVID-19 infection or transmission by or among NYPD police officers since the ‘vax or test’ policy has been in place,” the suit continued to say. “To the contrary, all evidence establishes that the policy has proven effective, and it has struck the appropriate balance between encouraging vaccination and respecting the medical autonomy of the NYPD officers.”

The association’s lawyers further argued that the city’s mandate will also adversely impact officers who have sincere religious or health concerns about COVID-19 vaccines, noting that many of these officers “put their lives on the line” throughout the pandemic.

In a Twitter post, the Police Benevolent Association said it also filed a request for a temporary restraining order to stop the city and the NYPD from implementing the vaccine requirement while litigation is pending.

City workers, including NYPD officers, who do not get vaccinated before the Oct. 29 deadline will be placed on unpaid leave and face termination from their jobs.

A spokesperson for de Blasio’s office told the New York Post that the mayor’s mandate is lawful and claimed it keeps residents safe. The Epoch Times has contacted de Blasio’s office for comment.

“Every effort to stop the city’s vaccine mandates has failed in court, and we believe this suit by the PBA will meet the same fate,” the spokesperson said. “The city’s vaccine mandates are lawful and keep New Yorkers safe. We’ll review the case.”

De Blasio on Monday echoed a previous claim that officials have “contingencies” for the NYPD and other agencies who lose staff over vaccine mandates.

“We’ve seen the mandates move a lot more people to get vaccinated,” he argued.

A lawsuit that was filed by Department of Education staff seeking a temporary injunction against a citywide mandate was rejected by a Manhattan federal judge earlier this month.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

No Significant Change In COVID-19 Hospitalization Outcomes During Delta Surge: CDC Study

TUESDAY, OCT 26, 2021 - 02:30 PM
Authored by Isabel van Brugen via The Epoch Times,

The highly transmissible Delta variant of COVID-19 does not appear to cause more severe disease among fully vaccinated or unvaccinated hospitalized patients, compared to earlier forms of the virus, according to preliminary data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).



The CDC study, released on Oct. 22, analyzed some 7,600 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, in the months of July and August, when the Delta variant became predominant in the United States. Researchers found that compared to earlier months, there was no significant change in hospitalized COVID-19 patients’ outcomes.

Specifically, although adult hospitalizations surged during the Delta wave, compared to the six months prior, the proportion of patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to an ICU, received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), or died during their hospitalization did not significantly change during this period, the data suggests.

The research however shows that adults aged 18 to 49, many of whom were unvaccinated, accounted for a larger proportion of hospitalized patients compared with the pre-Delta period—35.8 percent of hospitalizations compared to 24.7 percent from the previous six months.

Roughly 71 percent of COVID-19–associated hospitalizations during the Delta wave were in unvaccinated adults, the researchers said, adding that the lower vaccination coverage in the 18 to 49 demographic likely contributed to the increase in hospitalized patients during the Delta period.

The Delta variant of the CCP virus grew in prevalence in the country from 1.8 percent on May 1 to over 85 percent on July 10. It is now the dominant strain around the globe and has been reported in at least 187 out of 194 World Health Organization member countries, the organization earlier this month.
“Although this variant is more transmissible, this study did not find significantly higher proportions of hospitalizations with ICU admission, receipt of IMV, or in-hospital death in nonpregnant hospitalized adults,” the CDC study states.
They acknowledged a number of limitations, including that during spikes in COVID-19 cases during the Delta wave, the clinical thresholds for hospitalization and ICU admission might have shifted and could therefore have potentially obscured trends in increased severity.

The researchers also noted that some patients could also have been hospitalized but not tested for the virus, and the data could potentially change including cases from the summer months who do not yet have a discharge disposition.

A separate preprint study published on medRxiv on Oct. 6 suggests that children also do not get any sicker from the Delta variant than they did from earlier strains.

Researchers compared two groups of school-age children with COVID-19: 694 infected with the Alpha variant between late December 2020 and early May 2021, and 706 infected with Delta between late May and early July.

In both groups, very few children needed to be hospitalized and long periods of illness were uncommon. In both groups, half of the children were sick for no more than five days.

“Our data suggest that clinical characteristics of COVID-19 due to the Delta variant in children are broadly similar to COVID-19 due to other variants,” the researchers concluded, echoing remarks from CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky in September that although more children are getting infected with the virus, studies show that there has not been an increased disease severity in children.

“More children have COVID-19 because there is more disease in the community,” Walensky said of the Delta-driven wave in a statement.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Lost 'Lockdown' Months Of The COVID Crisis

TUESDAY, OCT 26, 2021 - 04:15 AM

Melbourne ended its latest lockdown at 11:59 PM local time on October 21st. While this iteration of restrictive measures only lasted 78 days, Statista's Florian Zandt notes that Australia's second-largest city leads the world with a cumulative 262 days spent with parts of the economy shut down to prevent the spread of the highly contagious Delta variant.

As our chart shows, one of the countries lagging behind now might soon overtake Melbourne in light of recent events.

Infographic: The Lost Months of the Coronavirus Pandemic | Statista
You will find more infographics at Statista

The country in question is, of course, the UK, where steadily rising case numbers and the discovery of a possible new Delta mutation have caused doctors to call for reintroducing the restrictions abolished on Freedom Day in July. As of now, Northern Ireland had to endure 223 total days of lockdowns, with England and Wales following closely behind with 213 and 212 days, respectively. The independent Republic of Ireland ranks third with 227 days after the Greater Buenos Aires area with 245 cumulative days.

While restrictions like mask mandates and shutting down non-essential businesses has been shown to have varied (if not negative) results in curbing the spread of the virus (no matter how strictly enforced), the best protection against hospitalization and death still appears to be getting vaccinated (or strengthening your immune system), even though the protection against the infection itself is losing efficacy over time.

As of October 18, almost 6.7 billion vaccine doses had been administered globally, with China, India and the European Union giving out the most shots in total.

When looking at the numbers, the disparity between more and less developed nations quickly becomes apparent: According to data from Bloomberg, African countries like Chad, South Sudan, Burkina Faso, Madagascar and the Democratic Republic of Congo haven't even administered enough doses to cover one percent of their population, while the administration of third doses or so-called booster shots is already underway or in the process of being rolled out in countries like Israel, the United States or the UK.

Finally, as we detailed previously, bear in mind that "viruses gonna virus!"
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[UK]


UK Faces 'Plan B' Peril: COVID Multiplies The Economic Threat

TUESDAY, OCT 26, 2021 - 03:30 AM
Authored by Bill Blain via MorningPorridge.com,

“T’was the best of times, t’was the worst of times …”

The risks of Plan B and a further Covid Lockdown are multiplying. It will clearly impact markets, but the real economic effects of Covid combined with energy costs, supply chains and bleak company earnings forecasts may be pushing us towards stagflation anyway.


"How to address the biggest economic shock in 300 years?” asked UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak while doing his pre-budget politicking last week.

Whatever you believe or don’t believe about Covid, Sunak is quite right to consider it at the centre of the on-going economic crisis. Markets should factor that reality accordingly – which boils down to a very simple question: how much will Covid force Central Banks and Governments to act to stabilise the global economy?

This week pay attention to the UK Budget on Wednesday on how Chancellor Sunak addresses the ongoing critical-care needs of the UK by stepping away from his previous “policy-mistake” sounding mention of austerity spending cuts and tax-rises to make noises about increased “levelling out” spending. Hanging over everything will be the question – how much more economic pain could Covid inflict?

It’s a tough question. A new lockdown would be economic suicide. The UK government plans to ride it out – but the history of the last 19 months says they won’t hesitate to make a U-Turn and institute Plan B if they think their credibility is on the line if the numbers of infections surge and the health service looks swamped. That’s a potential trade: should you sell UK stocks now on the likelihood the government will panic? (And buy-them back almost immediately as the Bank of England stops the noise about a rate cut and QE taper.)

But… another question is how much will rising infection numbers cause the economy to contract anyway? How much has confidence already been dented?

Here in Blighty, It’s a tale of two headlines:

Daily Mirror: Fears of new lockdown Christmas as scientists warn tougher Covid measures needed NOW.

Daily Telegraph: Coronavirus cases to slump this winter, say scientists.

The papers looks like it boils down to a political split – which may reflect the UK’s national pride in our venerable National Health Service. How much we are prepared to sacrifice to protect the sacred cow of the NHS has become a badge.

The left-leaning, Labour supporting Daily Mirror is peddling one set of scientific views, while the daily journal of the Conservative Party, the Torygraph, finds another set of white-coats to quote.

What does the threat of Plan B or further lockdowns mean for the UK economy? A quick glance round the motorway service stations we stopped in yesterday shows many more people wearing masks, and I’ll be interested in how many people start working from again as the perceived threat level rises.

I wonder how rationally people consider the pandemic. The vector for the rise in infections is schoolchildren being children – their interactions will diminish this week due to mid-term holidays. Back in September, a British Medical Journal report (How is vaccination affecting hospital admissions and deaths?) said 84% of hospital admissions before July had not been vaccinated, although rates of vaccinated infections were rising – their conclusion was simple: unvaccinated people are 3 times as likely to go to hospital and 3 times more likely to die.

There is a broad consensus the efficacy of vaccines wanes after 5-6 months – hence booster shots.

Maybe the best way to move forward is the Swedish solution of taking personal responsibility to rising infection numbers? However, research in the Guardian earlier this year suggests that strict-lockdown Denmark and easy-going Sweden experienced similar levels of economic dislocation, but Sweden suffered a death rate 5 times higher than Denmark! It’s down to behaviour – Sweden kept the schools, offices, shops and pubs open, but people got careful, stopped going out and kept the kids at home anyway.

As the supply chain crisis continues, and energy prices go through the roof, we already know it’s going to be a tough holiday season – retailers warning of toy shortages and price hikes on scarce Turkeys. It impacts consumer behaviour – we all want to spend, but if we can’t because of rising prices and falling incomes, and it feels dangerous to do so – then what effect does that have on spending patterns? It’s got to be negative.

We’re seeing the supply chain effects beginning to hit corporate results – an increasing number of firms have been giving lacklustre holiday earnings guidance. Intel took a spanking last week on the back of expectations of a downbeat outlook. Snap got pummelled on the back of a disappointing Q3 number. This week is big for Big Tech earnings – and names from Apple to Amazon could be pummelled by supply chain shortages and the problems these cause meeting holiday demand.

Headlines about a downbeat Apple sales forecast have consequences – not just in making global consumers a little more depressed about the future.

The very first thing junior economists learn about is multiplier effects – on consequences as lay-people call them. A company finds it can’t get it full allocation of Christmas units to sell so it cuts advertising, cuts stuff overtime and starts planning to cut investment in new plants, warehouses and future spending.

Repeat over the whole economy, and with everyone with less in their pockets… as “transitory” inflation feels increasingly permanent, and you’ve got a perfect recipe for stagflation.

I often get accused of being a misery-guts and far too negative about the state of the global economy. My own market mantras include the classic: “Things are never as bad as you fear, but never as good as you hope”.

Think about that for a moment. Covid caused the greatest economic downspike in 300 years, but the actions of swift government interventions to prop up commerce and fuel consumer spending kept the global economy functional, but wobbly. The markets quickly began to anticipate recovery and upside – yet these remain vulnerable to the news and perceptions around this Coronavirus.

Covid fears are multiplying again. Renewed Covid instability on the back of lockdown news from China, Europe, Australasia, wherever, will continue to roil markets. Supply chains remain fractured and the consequences of the virus effects on the global economy will continue.

Get used to it…
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

UCLA nurse livestreams getting fired…
Posted by Kane on October 27, 2021 1:35 am

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/088/816/902/original/dfbfbc1cc3b9c8ce.mp4?_=2 6:55 min

Livestream from AJ Hurley as he is being fired from UCLA Hospital for refusing to get the experimental mRNA Clotshot. He lost his job after seven years as a respiratory therapist after treating Covid patients from day one of the Scamdemic, all without a Vaccine.

Bonus Clip — This nurse was fired from UCLA last week
View: https://youtu.be/Eua_u3zTbjQ
.23 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[Spain]


Victory: Spain Must Repay 1 Million Covid Fines, First Lockdown Ruled Unconstitutional

user-avatar-pic.php
Amy Mek
October 26, 2021

image_large-1200x630.jpeg

Spain’s conservative Vox party demonstrates it is possible to challenge and win against governments’ grotesque and unconstitutional lockdowns.

The Spanish government has set up a special task force to reimburse or cancel more than a million fines issued to citizens during the first illegal coronavirus lockdown. The decision comes following the July ruling of the Spanish Constitutional Court, which declared the socialist governments’ oppressive lockdown measures unconstitutional.

On March 14 of 2020, an illegal “state of emergency” was declared by socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez by royal decree. State, regional and local police forces were given the power to fine those who did not comply with the strict lockdown measures. In addition, the country must repay a total of 1,142,127 fines illegally issued between March 14 and June 21.

According to TVE,
The ruling said that the limitations on movement violated citizens´ basic rights and therefore the state of emergency was insufficient to give them constitutional backing. The six magistrates said that a state of exception, which does allow the government to suspend basic rights, would have been necessary.”
Vox Party Fights Spain’s Socialist Government’s Lockdown
In mid-July, the court ruled that the lockdown imposed by the Spanish government was unconstitutional. The case was brought by Spain’s only conservative party, Vox. However, the media and left-wing parties relentlessly demonized and ridiculed Vox for taking the case to court on behalf of Spanish citizens.

The party leader, Santiago Abascal, took to Twitter after the decision of the High Court. “The greatest violation of rights in history was unconstitutional,” Abascal wrote on this social network. “The unconstitutionality of the general confinement of the population agreed by decree by the Government of Pedro Sánchez in March 2020,” summarizes the leader of Vox.

“Only Vox voted against. Only Vox appealed to the Constitutional Court to defend the rights and freedoms of the Spanish,” proclaimed Abascal.

In addition, he stressed that his party is the only one that opposes a government “installed in illegality in the abuse of power” and which he describes as “illegitimate” but also believes that “tramples the Constitution with the support of all parties.”

1635315016899.png

The Vox leader has called on the embattled PM Sanchez to resign. “We are not here to celebrate; we sentence, we cannot do so because it has been found that the Government is willing to violate the laws and trample the Constitution,” explained the leader of Vox.

Draconian Lockdown Measures
The court took into consideration the intensity and severity of the lockdown’s limitations on citizens. Spaniards were only allowed to take to the streets for groceries or work, which was deemed essential. For several weeks, people could not go outside to exercise or walk their dogs. The state prohibited all social encounters, even with relatives.

According to Summit News,
In one case, police were called after a neighbor spotted two brothers playing soccer in their own back yard.
Spain’s lockdown laws were so draconian that at one point authorities briefly told citizens that wearing masks while swimming in the sea was mandatory.
For many months during hot weather, wearing masks in every outdoor setting, even on beaches, was compulsory.

People were also issued fines of €2,000 euros for “disrespecting” a police officer during lockdown.

Numerous instances of police beating people for not wearing masks also emerged, while protesters at one point freed a woman from police arrest while cops were trying to handcuff her for not wearing a face covering.
As a result of the lockdown being declared unlawful, the Spanish government may face multiple lawsuits from individuals and businesses. Many citizens suffered undue hardships due to the government’s oppressive and unconstitutional lockdown.

Court Still Must Rule on Second lockdown
The Constitutional Court will also soon determine the legality or illegality of the second “state of emergency” from October 25, 2020, to June 9. More than 200,000 fines were issued during the second lockdown.

Spain’s Vox party demonstrates it is possible to challenge and win against governments’ grotesque and unconstitutional lockdowns. The conservative party’s constitutional challenge and victory must inspire all freedom-loving citizens to follow suit. It is time for citizens to take back their fundamental rights and liberties from power-hungry left-wing governments that never had the right to take them away.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Bombshell: The Leaky Vaccine Breakthrough Variant Is Here
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
October 26, 2021
in Opinions

Bombshell_ The Leaky Vaccine Breakthrough Variant Is Here


Editor’s Commentary: As our regular readers know, we do not invoke the word “bombshell” very often. In this article by Dr. Joseph Mercola, we could easily use the plural of the word because there are several extremely important pieces of information to disseminate.

First, the science appears to be pointing to an argument I’ve made for a while. I get tons of hate mail from people calling me out for saying that the “vaccines” may make people more susceptible to Covid-19, especially in the long run as the coronavirus continues to mutate. They call me every name in the book, most of which I could not repeat on this family-friendly site. But as more data comes in, the likelihood that my “conspiracy theory” is accurate rises.

Second, the need for natural immunity to become the primary attack against the disease is becoming increasingly clear. I’ve held back on suggesting something radical that would help the world fight this, but I’ll go ahead and explain it now.

We should consider using a controlled infection protocol, one in which young and healthy people plan visits to the hospital where they can be infected and immediately treated for Covid-19 until they’re well. There’s always a risk with things like this; even in the best circumstances it’s likely that some people will die. That’s why nobody is willing to suggest it, but expansion of natural immunity seems to be the best way to mitigate the effects of this disease.

Third, and this one needs to be thoroughly understood, antibody-dependent enhancement is a problem that will not only make people more susceptible to Covid-19 variants, but will also harm their body’s ability to fight off other diseases. It’s a massive problem that’s emerging right in front of our eyes, yet nobody in government, mainstream media, Big Tech, academia, or Big Pharma are even mentioning it. Those in the healthcare industry who talk about it usually dismiss it, but people like Dr. Mercola are ringing the alarm bells as loudly as possible.

This disease is not going away. It’s getting worse, and while many of my peers keep telling me it’s just a bad flu, I’ve seen how it can harm and kill the vulnerable. I do not dismiss its deadly risks to the elderly, but considering the recovery rates for anyone under the age of 50 are high and children have far less risk from Covid-19 than from the flu or other common diseases, I stand by my stance that we should treat this disease as an ailment and not as the existential threat they’re pushing in Pandemic Panic theater.

We are at a crossroad in American and world history. The evidence is clear that nearly every action taken by governments over the past two years has been futile at best. In many cases, their actions have done far more harm than if they did nothing at all. We need to continue to disseminate the truth to as many people as possible. This fight is far from over, but if we do not turn things around quickly we will soon realize the pandemic was just a way for the powers-that-be to exert total control over the mostly compliant population. Here’s Dr. Mercola’s article…

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • High COVID vaccination rates create pressure on the virus to mutate into variants with higher levels of contagion and pathogenicity. Recent research concluded that those who are fully “vaccinated” against COVID-19 are indeed more susceptible to COVID variant infections than unvaccinated people
  • The narrow protection you get from the COVID shot will inevitably necessitate a booster shot for each emerging new variant that is resistant to the shots
  • U.K. data show the COVID death toll is higher among the fully vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Between February 1, 2021, and September 12, 2021, 63.5% of those who died from COVID-19 within 28 days of a positive test were fully vaccinated
  • Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies now recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants, which suggests antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is emerging
  • Israeli research shows antibody levels rapidly decrease after the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID shot. IgG antibodies — which are part of your humoral immune response — decreased at a consistent rate over time, whereas the neutralizing antibodies rapidly decreased during the first three months, and then slowed down thereafter
It was only a matter of time before a vaccine-resistant strain of COVID-19 would surface, and that time has already come to pass. As reported by The Conservative Treehouse October 3, 2021:1

“What this study2 finds is exactly what vaccine developer Geert Vanden Bossche (Belgium) has been predicting. The predominance of antibody-resistant SARS-Cov-2 variants in vaccine breakthrough cases from the San Francisco Bay Area, California …

Dr. Vanden Bossche has been using Israeli data and showing3 how the widespread vaccination rates were creating pressure on the virus to mutate into variants with higher levels of contagion.

The unvaccinated group has been keeping the pressure down by defeating the virus and carrying natural immunity. However, as the unvaccinated population is increasingly made smaller, the pressure on the virus to mutate increases.

Subsequently, these mutations stay at higher or more effective levels of infection.”


Vaccine-Evading Variants Are Emerging
The study, posted on the preprint server medRxiv, August 25, 2021, concluded that those who are fully “vaccinated” against COVID-19 are in fact more susceptible to COVID variant infections than unvaccinated people.

Vanden Bossche’s theory was that vaccine antibodies would suppress natural antibody responses, allowing variants to slip through, and this seems to be what’s happening. As explained by The Conservative Treehouse October 3, 2021:4

“Among vaccinated individuals, a COVID variant virus is not recognized by the specialized antibodies provided by the vaccine, and the natural antibodies have been programmed to stand down.”

According to the authors of the study:5

“Associations between vaccine breakthrough cases and infection by SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have remained largely unexplored. Here we analyzed SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequences and viral loads from 1,373 persons with COVID-19 from the San Francisco Bay Area from February 1 to June 30, 2021, of which 125 (9.1%) were vaccine breakthrough infections.

Fully vaccinated were more likely than unvaccinated persons to be infected by variants carrying mutations associated with decreased antibody neutralization (78% versus 48%), but not by those associated with increased infectivity (85% versus 77%) …

These findings suggest that vaccine breakthrough cases are preferentially caused by circulating antibody-resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants, and that symptomatic breakthrough infections may potentially transmit COVID-19 as efficiently as unvaccinated infections, regardless of the infecting lineage.”


“Be careful around vaccinated people, because they can carry a more resistant form of COVID-19,” The Conservative Treehouse warns, adding that the narrow protection you get from the COVID shot will inevitably necessitate a booster shot for each emerging new variant that is resistant to the shots.

UK Data Show Increased COVID Mortality Among Fully Vaxxed
British data also raise serious questions about the wisdom of this injection campaign. In its Technical Briefing 23,6 published September 17, 2021, Public Health England reveals data showing the COVID death toll is actually higher among the fully vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.

Between February 1, 2021, and September 12, 2021, 157,400 fully vaccinated patients (26.52% of total cases) were diagnosed with a Delta variant. Among the unvaccinated, there were 257,357 Delta variant cases (43.36% of total cases).

However, while Delta infections were far more prevalent among the unvaccinated, these patients also had better outcomes. In all, 63.5% of those who died from COVID-19 within 28 days of a positive test were fully vaccinated (1,613 compared to 722 in the unvaccinated group).

More Signs of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement
In a letter to the editor of the Journal of Infection,7 published August 9, 2021, three researchers point out that “infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants,” which suggests antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is emerging. According to the authors:8

“Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection is a safety concern for vaccine strategies. In a recent publication, Li et al. (Cell 184 :4203–4219, 2021) have reported that infection-enhancing antibodies directed against the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein facilitate virus infection in vitro, but not in vivo.

However, this study was performed with the original Wuhan/D614G strain. Since the Covid-19 pandemic is now dominated with Delta variants, we analyzed the interaction of facilitating antibodies with the NTD of these variants … [W]e show that enhancing antibodies have a higher affinity for Delta variants than for Wuhan/D614G NTDs …

As the NTD is also targeted by neutralizing antibodies, our data suggest that the balance between neutralizing and facilitating antibodies in vaccinated individuals is in favor of neutralization for the original Wuhan/D614G strain.

However, in the case of the Delta variant, neutralizing antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity. Thus, ADE may be a concern for people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence (either mRNA or viral vectors).”


As noted by independent journalist Sharyl Attkisson,9 “Despite the fact that multiple medical authorities predicted, told us, and hoped, ADE would not impact Covid-19 vaccines, data from the study indicates it has done just that.”

Antibody Levels Decrease After Second Dose
While you’re not considered “fully vaccinated” until 14 days after your first dose of Janssen’s or AstraZeneca’s shot, or second dose of Moderna’s or Pfizer’s, a recent Israeli study found antibody levels actually decrease after the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID shot. The findings were reported by The Jerusalem Post, October 7, 2021:10

“Antibody levels decrease rapidly after two doses of the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine, a study11 by researchers at the Sheba Medical Center published … in the New England Journal of Medicine …

The research also showed the probability that different groups of individuals — based on age and general health status — will find themselves below a certain antibody threshold after a period of six months.”


In all, 4,868 staff members at the Sheba Medical Center participated in the study,12 undergoing monthly serological tests to measure their antibodies for up to six months after their second Pfizer shot.
Everyone, regardless of age or gender, saw a rapid decline in their antibodies after the second dose. IgG antibodies — which are part of your humoral immune response — decreased at a consistent rate over time, whereas the neutralizing antibodies rapidly decreased during the first three months, and then slowed down thereafter. According to the authors:13

“Although IgG antibody levels were highly correlated with neutralizing antibody titers (Spearman’s rank correlation between 0.68 and 0.75), the regression relationship between the IgG and neutralizing antibody levels depended on the time since receipt of the second vaccine dose …

The highest titers after the receipt of the second vaccine dose (peak) were observed during days 4 through 30, so this was defined as the peak period.

The expected geometric mean titer (GMT) for IgG for the peak period, expressed as a sample-to-cutoff ratio, was 29.3. A substantial reduction in the IgG level each month, which culminated in a decrease by a factor of 18.3 after 6 months, was observed.

Neutralizing antibody titers also decreased significantly, with a decrease by a factor of 3.9 from the peak to the end of study period 2, but the decrease from the start of period 3 onward was much slower, with an overall decrease by a factor of 1.2 during periods 3 through 6. The GMT of neutralizing antibody, expressed as a 50% neutralization titer, was 557.1 in the peak period and decreased to 119.4 in period 6 …

Six months after receipt of the second dose, neutralizing antibody titers were substantially lower among men than among women, lower among persons 65 years of age or older than among those 18 to less than 45 years of age, and lower among participants with immunosuppression than among those without immunosuppression.”


COVID-19 Unrelated to Jab in 68 Countries, 2,947 US Counties
The Israeli findings above can help explain the findings of a study14 published September 30, 2021, in the European Journal of Epidemiology, which found no relationship between COVID-19 cases and levels of vaccination in 68 countries worldwide and 2,947 counties in the U.S. If anything, areas with high vaccination rates had slightly higher incidences of COVID-19. According to the authors:15
“[T]he trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.”

Iceland and Portugal, for example, where more than 75% of their populations are fully vaccinated, had more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than Vietnam and South Africa, where only about 10% of the populations are fully vaccinated.16

Data from U.S. counties showed the same thing. New COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people were “largely similar,” regardless of the percentage of a state’s population that was fully vaccinated.

“There … appears to be no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated,” the authors wrote.17 Notably, out of the five U.S. counties with the highest vaccination rates — ranging from 84.3% to 99.9% fully vaccinated — four of them were on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s “high transmission” list. Meanwhile, 26.3% of the 57 counties with “low transmission” have vaccination rates below 20%.

The study even accounted for a one-month lag time that could occur among the fully vaccinated, since it’s said that it takes two weeks after the final dose for “full immunity” to occur. Still, “no discernable association between COVID-19 cases and levels of fully vaccinated” was observed.18

Key Reasons Why Reliance on Jabs Should Be Reexamined
The study summed up several reasons why the “sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19” should be reevaluated. For starters, the jab’s effectiveness is rapidly waning.

“A substantial decline in immunity from mRNA vaccines six months’ post immunization has … been reported,” the researchers noted, adding that even severe hospitalization and death from COVID-19, which the jabs claim to protect against, have increased from 0.01% to 9% and 0% to 15.1%, respectively, among the fully vaccinated from January 2021 to May 2021.19

If the jabs work as advertised, why haven’t these rates continued to rise instead of fall? “It is also emerging,” the researchers noted, “that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may not be as strong as immunity acquired through recovery from the COVID-19 virus.”20
Natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. ~ T. Patalon et.al. August 2021
For instance, a retrospective observational study published August 25, 2021, revealed that natural immunity is superior to immunity from COVID-19 jabs. According to the authors:21

“This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.”

Reinfection Is Very Rare
The fact is, while breakthrough cases continue among those who have gotten one or more COVID-19 injections, it’s extremely rare to get COVID-19 after you’ve recovered from the infection. How rare? Researchers from Ireland conducted a systematic review including 615,777 people who had recovered from COVID-19, with a maximum duration of follow-up of more than 10 months.22

“Reinfection was an uncommon event,” they noted, “with no study reporting an increase in the risk of reinfection over time.” The absolute reinfection rate ranged from 0% to 1.1%, while the median reinfection rate was just 0.27%.23,24,25
Another study revealed similarly reassuring results. It followed 43,044 SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positive people for up to 35 weeks, and only 0.7% were reinfected.

When genome sequencing was applied to estimate population-level risk of reinfection, the risk was estimated at 0.1%.26

There was no indication of waning immunity over seven months of follow-up, unlike with the COVID-19 injection, which led the researchers to conclude that “Reinfection is rare. Natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against reinfection with an efficacy >90% for at least seven months.”27

Read the rest here:
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Liberty Counsel Challenges Biden’s Unlawful Shot Mandates

Oct 26, 2021

Liberty Counsel recently filed a class action lawsuit along with a motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction against Joseph R. Biden, U.S. Secretary of the Department of Defense and U.S. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security on behalf of members from all five branches of the military, federal employees and federal civilian contractors, who have been unlawfully mandated to get the COVID shots or face dishonorable discharge from the military or termination from employment. The preliminary injunction hearing will be on Monday, November 15 at 9 a.m., in the Middle District Court of Florida.

Liberty Counsel’s plaintiffs hold sincere religious beliefs against the COVID shots that their body is the temple of the Holy Spirit and to defile it is a sin against God. They do not want to participate directly or indirectly or otherwise be associated with the destruction of human life through abortion by injecting a product that contains or was tested or developed with aborted fetal cell lines.

The plaintiffs have all submitted religious exemption requests but have been told there are no religious exemptions. For the military plaintiffs, they have been told that merely submitting such a request will subject them to dishonorable discharge. The federal employees and civilian contractors similarly have faced opposition and none of the civilian contractors have received any guidance on where or how to file a religious exemption.

The military plaintiffs include two Navy SEALs, a Navy EOD Officer, a Navy Senior Chief Petty Officer, a Navy Chaplain, two Marine Lt. Colonels, two Marine Lance Corporals, an Air Force Major, an Air Force Technical Sergeant, an Army National Guardsman, an Army Colonel, and a Coast Guard Lieutenant.

2021-10-26-CV-MilitaryFlag-T143615.794.jpg


All of them are exemplary representatives of America’s military force. However, because of this unlawful COVID shot mandate, they are now placed in the position of having to choose between their job and their faith.

For example, one of the lieutenant colonels in the Marine Corps served in the reserves and volunteered for active duty following the attacks on September 11.

In 2003, she wanted to be a role model for other women and completed officer candidate school where she received her commission as a second lieutenant in the Marine Corps. As a company grade officer, she served in several leadership roles including duties as a platoon commander during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

As a field grade officer, she was selected and served as a Department of Defense Fellow and helped conduct research to integrate women into ground combat arms jobs. Later, she was selected for command and staff college where she earned her master’s degree.

However, this lieutenant colonel’s decision not to receive the COVID shot is because of her experiencing God’s forgiveness and healing from her own abortion. In 1995, she was raped and became pregnant. The anger and humiliation of the sexual assault led her to have an abortion which made her even more ashamed. In fact, after her abortion, she felt like a murderer. However, her husband helped her realize that through repentance God forgave her for the abortion. The COVID shot mandate places her in the position of reliving her rape and subsequent abortion, by being forcibly injected with a product tested on or made with aborted fetal cells or being dishonorably discharged from the service she loves.

Another military plaintiff, a coast guard lieutenant, has spent 14 years in service to her country. She felt the call to serve as a young child and followed in the footsteps of two generations of her family. She submitted a request for a religious accommodation and exemption from the Coast Guard outlining her sincerely held religious objections to receiving one of the injections. While breastfeeding her child born earlier this year, she is currently under a temporary medical exemption while undergoing testing for allergies to vaccine components. Now she has been informed that should these waivers be denied, she may face an other-than-honorable discharge, loss of benefits, and other disciplinary measures if she does not accept the shot.

Liberty Counsel’s non-military plaintiffs include a Department of Defense contractor who has conducted Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) quantitative and qualitative assessments and studies, whose assessments are briefed to DOD senior leadership to inform decisions on future employment, allocation, and procurement; a federal civilian engineer employed by a large military defense contractor that provides LCD screens used in United States Armed Forces aircraft; a federal civilian contractor employer whose company develops and supports military weapons systems, including current and next generation land vehicles for the Army and next generation Navy vessels; a federal nuclear contractor employee who is a young woman opposed to abortion and who desires to have children of her own one day; and a Department of Energy civilian nuclear tech who works at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

The COVID shots cannot be mandatory under the federal Emergency Use Authorization law (EUA). While BioNTech’s COMIRNATY is FDA approved, it is not available and will not be for at least many months. There is no FDA-approved COVID shot available. Under the EUA, individuals have the “option to accept or refuse” the products. Every COVID shot mandate is illegal.

The plaintiffs’ free exercise of religion is protected under the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). Regarding RFRA, the Supreme Court wrote, “That statute prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion unless it demonstrates that doing so both furthers a compelling governmental interest and represents the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. Because RFRA operates as a kind of super statute, displacing the normal operation of other federal laws, it might supersede Title VII’s commands in appropriate cases” (emphasis added).

In addition to RFRA, the plaintiffs’ free exercise of religion is also protected by the First Amendment.

Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “The Biden administration has no authority to require the COVID shots for the military or for federal employees or civilian contractors. Every COVID shot mandate is illegal under the Emergency Use Authorization law.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dozens of Business Groups and Labor Unions Beg Biden-Harris Regime to Push Vaccine Mandate Until AFTER Christmas

By J.D. Rucker • Oct. 26, 2021

News has been coming out this week that business groups and labor unions are pushing for the Biden-Harris regime to delay their vaccine mandates for businesses until after Christmas. They say the mass exodus of employees and reduction of infrastructure support such as truckers will destroy their chances of boosting the economy during the Christmas buying spree.

According to CNBC:
Worried that President Joe Biden’s Covid vaccine mandate for private companies could cause a mass exodus of employees, business groups are pleading with the White House to delay the rule until after the holiday season.

White House officials at the Office of Management and Budget held dozens of meetings with labor unions, industry lobbyists and private individuals last week as the administration conducts its final review of the mandate, which will require businesses with 100 or more employees to ensure they are vaccinated against Covid or tested weekly for the virus. It is estimated to cover roughly two-thirds of the private sector workforce.

OMB officials have several meetings lined up Monday and Tuesday with groups representing dentists, trucking companies, staffing companies and realtors, among others.

The American Trucking Associations, which will meet with the OMB on Tuesday, warned the administration last week that many drivers will likely quit rather than get vaccinated, further disrupting the national supply chain at time when the industry is already short 80,000 drivers.
The trucking association estimates companies covered by the mandate could lose 37% of drivers through retirements, resignations and workers switching to smaller companies not covered by the requirements.
“Now placing vaccination mandates on employers, which in turn force employees to be vaccinated, will create a workforce crisis for our industry and the communities, families and businesses we serve,” Chris Spear, the association’s president and CEO, wrote in a letter to the OMB last Thursday.

Retailers are also particularly concerned the mandate could trigger a spike in resignations that would exacerbate staffing problems at businesses already short on people, said Evan Armstrong, a lobbyist at the Retail Industry Leaders Association.

“It has been a hectic holiday season already, as you know, with supply chain struggles,” Armstrong told CNBC after a meeting with White House officials last Monday. “This is a difficult policy to implement. It would be even more difficult during the holiday season.”

Thirty percent of unvaccinated workers said they would leave their jobs rather than comply with a vaccine or testing mandate, according to a KFF poll published last month. Goldman Sachs, in an analysis published in September, said the mandate could hurt the already tight labor market. However, it said survey responses are often exaggerated and not as many people will actually quit.
This is all fine from a business perspective, but they’re missing the bigger boat on this one. We don’t need a delay. We need a reversal. The vaccine mandates are supposed to be coming out sometime soon, though we don’t see the regime rushing to push it through. Whether they come out before Christmas or after, the mandates still represent the segregation of society and an unconstitutional suppression of our rights. Not much changes if they come out in November, December, or January. They will cripple the already-flailing economy. Getting a little extra cushion during Christmas is not a viable solution in the short term, let along down the road.

It will be interesting to see how the regime responds. If they do not listen to these business groups and labor unions, then we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the White House is propelling us as quickly towards economic collapse as possible. That seems to be the case anyway considering the policies they’ve put into place already, but a rushed vaccine mandate will verify the conspiracy is real.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[UK]


CORONAVIRUS
Leaked Government Report Finds Vaccine Passports Could Actually Increase Spread of COVID

By forcing them to visit smaller, more poorly ventilated venues.

PJW.jpg

26 October, 2021
Paul Joseph Watson
261021pass1.jpg

dikobraziy via Getty Images
Leaked Government Report Finds Vaccine Passports Could Actually Increase Spread of COVID
A leaked government report has found that vaccine passports could actually exacerbate the spread of COVID because they would encourage people to visit smaller, more poorly ventilated venues.

According to the report, compiled by the the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [DCMS], introducing the scheme could actually have the opposite intended effect.

“If certification displaces some fans from structured and well ventilated sports stadia, this could lead to them attending unstructured and poorly ventilated pubs instead, where they will have access to more alcohol than if there were in the stadia,” states the report. “Evidence from the Euros showed spikes in cases associated with pubs even when England were playing abroad.”

“The policy would also slash turnover for the organisers of events required to use vaccine passports, and necessitate the hiring of thousands of new stewards which may be hard to deliver,” reports the Telegraph.

After Scotland tried to introduce vaccine passports, the process was called an “unmitigated disaster,” with staff at nightclubs receiving abuse and the technology repeatedly failing.

Many venues decided to close early and lost 40% of their footfall, illustrating once again how the scheme will put innumerable nightclubs that operate on a profit margin of 15% out of business for good.

Another example of how vaccine passports are largely useless is the fact that providing a negative test is no longer being offered as an option, despite the fact that the vaccinated can still transmit the virus.

As we highlight in the video below, people visiting nightclubs in Ireland had to be vaccinated to get in, but were then told that masks were not required while dancing.

Apparently, COVID has developed some form of artificial intelligence so that it knows when to leave people alone when they are rubbing up to dozens of other sweaty people in close proximity.

View: https://youtu.be/MdSJOcjC0Do
12:07 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

FDA Committee Members Reviewing Pfizer Vaccine For Children Have Worked For Pfizer, Have Big Pfizer Connections
This Is A Staggering Conflict of Interest

Patrick Howley
by PATRICK HOWLEY
October 26, 2021

Pfizer CEO Claims Vaccine ‘Booster’ Shots, Annual Vaccination May Be Necessary

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee is holding a virtual meeting Tuesday October 26 to discuss authorizing a Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus vaccine for children between the ages of 5 to 11 years old.

This committee has a lot of sway with the FDA and their findings will be relevant, considering the Biden administration is getting ready to ship vaccines to elementary schools and California has already mandated the vaccine for schoolchildren pending federal authorization.

But the meeting roster shows that numerous members of the committee and temporary voting members have worked for Pfizer or have major connections to Pfizer.

Members include a former vice president of Pfizer Vaccines, a recent Pfizer consultant, a recent Pfizer research grant recipient, a man who mentored a current top Pfizer vaccine executive, a man who runs a center that gives out Pfizer vaccines, the chair of a Pfizer data group, a guy who was proudly photographed taking a Pfizer vaccine, and numerous people who are already on the record supporting Coronavirus vaccines for children. Meanwhile, recent FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb is on Pfizer’s board of directors.

HERE’S THE MEETING ROSTER: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 26, 2021 Meeting Draft Roster.

Acting Chair Arnold S. Monto was a paid Pfizer consultant as recently as 2018.

Steven Pergam got the Pfizer vaccine: Building trust in safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines (fredhutch.org)

pergam.jpg


Committee member Archana Chatterjee worked on a research project related to vaccines for infants between 2018-2020, and the research project was sponsored by Pfizer.

pfizerscreenshot.jpg


Myron Levine has mentored some U.S. post-doctoral fellows, and one of his proteges happens to be Raphael Simon, the senior director of vaccine research and development at Pfizer.

myronmlevine.jpg


James Hildreth, temporary voting member, made a financial interest disclosure for this meeting in which he disclosed more than $1.5 million in relevant financial interests, including his work as president of Meharry Medical College, which administers Pfizer Coronavirus vaccines.

Geeta K. Swamy is listed as the chair of the “Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program,” a committee sponsored by Pfizer. Duke University states that “Dr. Swamy serves as a co-investigator for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial.”

anotherpfizer.jpg


Gregg Sylvester previously served as a vice president for Pfizer Vaccines, where he launched Pfizer vaccines including one for children.

greggsylvester.jpg


Among the meeting’s “temporary voting members,” Ofer Levy, Boston Children’s Hospital, is for the Pfizer vaccine for children, Eric Rubin is pro-vaccine for children, Jay Portnoy supports authorizing Coronavirus vaccines for kids, and Melinda Wharton complained over the summer about how orders for the CDC’s “Vaccines For Children” program dropped.

FDANews stated last December: “FDA advisory committee members in the past have frequently been the target of heavy politicking by industry representatives of whatever drug they were considering for a recommendation at in-person meetings. That process has been somewhat altered by the fact that during COVID-19, meetings are being held virtually. But it’s likely that behind-the-scenes pressuring still goes on. The industry defends the attempts to influence committee members as simply efforts to best present their case.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Florida’s Surgeon General Shreds ‘Climate of Dishonesty’ About Covid in Epic Rant Against Mandates

October 26, 2021
by Kyle Becker
Screenshot-10_26_2021-9_58_00-AM-810x398.jpg

14d82f3bb3cc9f0e8724516d767fa5ad

Written by Kyle Becker

Florida’s Surgeon General, Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, went off on an epic rant against the “climate of dishonesty” that has surrounded the mainstream media’s Covid pandemic coverage since the very beginning.

Ladapo shred the media’s myths and misrepresentations about how the coronavirus behaves and the most prudent public health policies to limit its damage. Watch:

Rumble video on website 2:19 min

“You remember when people were telling you that these vaccines would stop transmission and the rates of protection were greater than 90%?” he asked.

“Well, you know, guess what, here we are about 10 months afterward and we’re finding that the data is showing that some of these vaccines, the protection from infection is less than 40%.”

“And even less than that, for some of them,” he said. “As we now know, these vaccines are not preventing transmission. So sure, they reduce the likelihood of transmission, and even that is sort of questionable, depending on how far out you go. But they’re not preventing it.”

“So this idea that you know, I’ve heard some leaders say things like, we’ll create safe workplaces, by mandating these vaccines,” he continued. “Well, they’re really decoupled, because the infections can still happen, whether people were vaccinated or not. I mean, that’s very obvious, you know. And you remember these people were also telling you that all these breakthrough infections were rare. Well, they’re obviously not rare. In fact, they’re common.”

“And so and so that’s the truth,” he added. “So this idea that the vaccine mandates are needed to create safe workplaces is a complete lie. It’s continued to be repeated and you should know that it’s not at all backed up by science. In fact, the science says something that’s completely the opposite and that’s the fact.”

“Part of the reason that people are not comfortable, some people are not comfortable with these vaccines is because of the climate of dishonesty, scientific dishonesty, about the science, right?” he said. “Whether it’s natural immunity, denial of that in the face of data, or in the case of the vaccines, open, honest discussions about both effectiveness and safety. There’s been dishonesty around that.”

“The reality of how safe these vaccines are is absolutely not public,” he added.

“Healthy people who’ve had adverse reactions after the vaccines, there’s been a concerted effort to prevent these types of stories, these experiences from receiving the attention that they obviously should receive.”

“It’s completely ridiculous,” he said. “Americans can sense, many Americans can sense that there’s total dishonesty about the safety of the vaccines. That’s one of the things the Governor and I are going to work on.”

This is a brilliant, scientifically valid, and provocative dissection of the state of the science and the failures of the radical left’s Covid policies to do anything significantly to stop the spread, all while doing tremendous economic and social damage to the country. So, of course, the left hates it. Surprisingly, MSNBC and Daily Kos attacked Ladapo and unsurprisingly continued to perpetuate the scientific dishonesty that he so eloquently condemned.

Oh, by the way. Florida now has the lowest Covid case rates per capita in America. Meanwhile, northern and beltway states are still fighting the recent Delta variant surge, despite vaccine mandates, mask mandates, and even vaccine passports in the case of New York City.

Florida has been the “control group” that shows you that blue states’ policies are being driven more by politics than by public health. The left’s only real response is to muster more outrage and lies to justify in a flailing attempt to justify their failed authoritarian policies. But Florida has definitively showed that you can follow the actual science and still defend Americans’ freedom and constitutional rights. No “climate of dishonesty” is going to be able to change that.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

More on Original Antigenic Sin and the Folly of Our Universal Vaccination Campaign
A deeper look at a decisive limitation of our adaptive immune systems.

eugyppius
19 hr ago549413

To review: We have now had ten months of mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Nearly 7 billion doses have been administered worldwide. This unprecedented campaign has not eradicated Corona; it has not even suppressed infections.

Instead, case statistics have ballooned almost everywhere. While the vaccinated appear to enjoy some protection against severe outcomes, skyrocketing transmission means most countries have seen little benefit, on balance, from their universal vaccination campaigns. The most pressing question has become, simply: What is going on?

I’ve explored a few different possibilities. First, there seems to be a Marek Effect at work. We might imagine that all viruses have an optimal level of population-wide virulence – an advantageous degree of aggression at which they can spread effectively, while not driving their hosts underground too soon. Certain Delta sub-strains, previously punished for their excessive aggression in unvaccinated populations, have likely been favoured by the vaccines, which reduce symptoms in the vaccinated without preventing infection for more than a few months. Our vaccines reduced the average virulence of SARS-2, and the virus adapted to reattain the prior, optimal balance.

But the virus and its interactions with human hosts constitute a complex system.

In such systems, it is very unlikely that any effect can be put down to a single cause. The Public Health England data provide powerful reasons to suspect that the vaccines may be compromising immunity to SARS-2 via Original Antigenic Sin. This is not a crazy internet fantasy, but a well-observed limitation of human immunity. It is the primary reason that respiratory viruses like influenza return again and again. Despite multiple reinfections across the whole population, we are never quite immune to the flu, because its strategy is to exploit the way our immune systems learn.

The mechanisms of Original Antigenic Sin are not fully understood, but we have a rough idea of what might be happening. When a virus infects your body for the first time, your naive memory B cells imprint on specific virus proteins, or antigens, presented to them. These B cells then become either memory B cells or plasma cells. Forever after, they specialise in producing antibodies against those specific antigens. When a slightly mutated form of the virus arrives, these memory B-cells begin pouring forth the antibodies they learned to produce during the first infection. These antibodies bind to multiple epitopes on the virus particles, and in the process they give the slower-moving naive B-cells little chance to learn about any new, mutant virus features.

Original Antigenic Sin was most influentially described by Thomas Francis in 1960. He noted that, regardless of whatever influenza A strains were in circulation, subjects tended to have dominant antibody responses to the strains that were current in their early childhood:
The antibody of childhood is largely a response to … the virus causing the first Type A influenza infection of the lifetime. As the group grows older and subsequent infections take place, antibodies to additional families of virus are acquired. But … the antibody which is first established continues to characterize that cohort of the population throughout its life. The antibody forming mechanisms have been highly conditioned by the first stimulus, so that later infections with strains of the same type successively enhance the original antibody to maintain it at the highest level at all times in that age group. The imprint established by the original virus infection governs the antibody response thereafter. This we have called the doctrine of original antigenic sin.
An important consequence of this childhood conditioning, is that different age cohorts within the population have overlapping or layered immunity to different influenza strains. This is an important if subtle aspect of our population-wide immunity to influenza A. It looks like this:


As older cohorts die, their immunity to older strains dies with them. These old strains, long suppressed, are then positioned to return, for very few human immune systems remember them any longer. Francis believed this was the mechanism underlying periodic cycles of pandemic influenza. The 1957 influenza pandemic, for example, featured a strain of flu against which only the oldest cohorts – those in their 70s – had specific antibodies. As these “immunological veterans” disappeared, this older, long-suppressed type of influenza was free to return and cause another pandemic event.

In conclusion, Francis proposed that optimised influenza vaccines might be administered to children before their first infection. He envisioned vaccines designed to confer immunity against “known or anticipated recurrent strains” and hoped that “In this manner the original sin of infection could be replaced by an initial blessing of induced immunity.”

Strategic vaccination conferring immunity against likely future strains is of course exactly the opposite of our current efforts to give every last living human multiple vaccinations against an extinct strain of SARS-2.
*
The existence of Original Antigenic Sin has been confirmed by generations of research, and the literature is full of curious findings. A major reason flu shots don’t work, for example, is that they are powerless to redirect adult immune systems against novel influenza strains. Most people who get flu shots are adults, with immune systems long since primed by childhood infection. Hence this old Lancet case study of influenza outbreaks among boys at Christ’s Hospital in Sussex in the 1970s:
In each outbreak, the protective effect of inactivated influenza-A vaccine was limited to those boys, not already immune, who were vaccinated for the first time with the most up-to-date strain.
Revaccination with the same strain did not increase the degree of protection, and revaccination with a later strain did not afford protection against subsequent challenge.
The flu vaccines, in other words, work great if you’ve never had the flu before. Otherwise they don’t do anything.

And consider these remarks, from a 2005 article in Nature Medicine:
It is often difficult to further increase antibody levels, specificity and the quality of the immune response in individuals who have been repeatedly immunized through either vaccination or recurrent exposure to infectious agents or cross-reacting microbial antigens. This has been a particular concern for aging adults in the context of the antigenic drift of influenza virus, in view of their annual exposure to antigens of new but related influenza variants through either infection or vaccination. After exposure to a new but cross-reacting antigenic variant, such individuals may respond by producing antibodies that are primarily directed at antigens characterizing influenza viruses encountered during earlier epidemics.
The authors go on to write that the “impact” of Original Antigenic Sin “on protection is far from established,” noting earlier research showing substantial all-cause mortality reductions from flu shots. Later work, though, has shown that the mortality reduction of influenza vaccines is largely an illusion of selection effects. For a variety of reasons, those most likely to die of influenza are far less likely than healthier groups to be vaccinated.

Original Antigenic Sin has been famously implicated in dengue fever. This is considered to be an extreme case of the phenomenon, with “considerable bearing on vaccine strategies.” Here the conclusions are ominous and full of implications for our own situation:
Once a response has been established, it is unlikely that repeat boosting will be able to change its scope, meaning that balanced responses against the four virus serotypes will need to be established with the first vaccine dose.
The danger is that immunity to one strain alone may lead to permanently impaired immune response to the three other serotypes, causing worse and longer illness.
*
Influenza had been infecting humans for generations before anybody came up with the notion of influenza vaccines. Despite the efforts of public health authorities everywhere, most people catch the flu before they are ever vaccinated, and so flu shots have little opportunity to undermine population-wide immunity to influenza A.

The complex system constituted by SARS-CoV-2 and its interactions with the human immune system, on the other hand, remains barely understood. In chasing an empty fantasy of herd immunity, authorities are denying human populations everywhere the opportunity to develop the layered, population-wide resistance against successive SARS-2 strains that is the foundation of our immunity against other respiratory viruses. Aside from the minority that have managed to recover from natural infection before the vaccinators got to them, most humans will have their crucial, primary immune response conditioned by the spike protein of SARS-2 in its vintage 2020 configuration.

It is a near certainty that this immunity will attenuate antibody responses to the spike protein of current and future variants, forever. Mutant spike proteins will increasingly escape vaccine-conferred immunity, and breakthrough infections will elicit only partial response to the new epitopes. Insofar as the data also suggest that our vaccines will attenuate immunity to other virus proteins beyond spike, mass vaccination will lead to ever more volatile waves of infection – in exchange for limited and fading protection against severe outcomes.

The most dangerous thing to do, at this point, would be to vaccinate children.

The virus is not a threat to them, and if they are infected by the new forms of SARS-2 that are sure to emerge every winter, we will begin to establish – through them and the as yet unvaccinated – the layered immunity that is the only way of coming to terms with SARS-2 in the longer term. As long as the vaccinators are permitted to continue their radical and increasingly insane campaign, though, nothing will improve. Indeed, their policies threaten to bring about a semi-permanent pandemic state for generations to come.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

CDC Travel Announcement: CDC Quarantine Officers Will Now Spot-Check Travelers for Compliance to Rules [foreign travelers - not illegal aliens]

By Jim Hoft
Published October 26, 2021 at 10:40pm

The CDC announced they sending CDC quarantine officers to spot-check passengers for compliance of rules.
cdc-agents.jpg


HotAir reported:
There are some exceptions to the new requirements. Children under the age of 18 and people from countries experiencing a shortage of COVID-19 vaccines will be exempt from providing proof of vaccination.
Beginning November 8, foreign travelers described as non-immigrant adults traveling to the U.S. will have to be fully vaccinated. All travelers will have to be tested before boarding a plane to the U.S. Tightened restrictions for American and foreign citizens not fully vaccinated will be in place…

…The U.S. will accept any FDA-approved vaccine for regular or emergency use or approved by the World Health Organization. These include Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and China’s Sinopharm and Sinovac vaccines. Mixing and matching of approved shots will be permitted.

The airlines are stuck with enforcing the new requirements. They will be required to verify vaccine records and match them against identity information. Here’s a new twist – how do quarantine officers sound?

Quarantine officers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will spot-check passengers who arrive in the U.S. for compliance, according to an administration official.

Airlines that don’t enforce the requirements could be subject to penalties of up to nearly $35,000 per violation.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Former CDC Director Robert Redfield Claims More Than 40% COVID-19 Deaths in Maryland Were Fully Vaccinated

By Jim Hoft
Published October 27, 2021 at 7:50am

39611769-71CA-4E38-9588-9312C1F5395A.jpeg


Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield said on Monday that more than 40 percent of people who have died from Wuhan coronavirus in the state of Maryland over the last 6-8 weeks were fully vaccinated.

During his interview with Martha MacCallum on FOX News, Former CDC Director Redfield now senior advisor to Governor Hogan in MD, made an alarming admission that 40 percent of the recent COVID-19 deaths in Maryland were fully vaccinated.

“I hear a lot of times people feel it’s a rare event that fully vaccinated people may die. I happen to be the senior advisor to Governor Hogan in the state of Maryland. In the last 6-8 weeks, more than 40 percent of people who died in Maryland were fully vaccinated,” said Redfield when asked about Colin Powell’s death.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1452567147155234816
.18 min

However, Andy Owen, a spokesperson for the Maryland Department of Health had a different claim that from Sept. 1 to Oct. 15, only about 30% of Marylanders who died of confirmed COVID-19 were fully vaccinated.

MSN reported:
In all, 649 people died in that time frame, which means, according to MDH, that 195 of those deaths were people who received the vaccine.
The health department said many of those people who died also had other health conditions that made them more vulnerable.

Officials released a statement writing, “This further underscores our mission to maintain immunity by urging eligible Marylanders to get their booster shots.”
Hat Tip David
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

70 Percent of COVID-19 Deaths Both in Sweden and UK in September Were “Fully Vaccinated”

By Jim Hoft
Published October 27, 2021 at 8:00am
towfiqu-barbhuiya-cOH3j5lQDYo-unsplash-1-scaled.jpg

Government data revealed that in September, 70% of COVID-19 deaths both in Sweden and the UK were “fully vaccinated” individuals.

Swedish Public Health Agency reported that 70% of Covid 19 deaths involved “fully vaccinated” individuals between Sept. 1 and Sept. 24, according to Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet. The country recorded about 130 fatal Covid cases during that period.

1635366867528.png

1635366809185.png

LifeSiteNews reported:
Possible reasons for the uptick in vaccinated deaths include “that it has now been quite a while since the oldest ones were vaccinated, that the vaccine coverage has increased, that the restrictions have been eased, and that the Delta strain has taken over,” microbiology researcher Farshid Jalalvand told the paper.

Sweden’s death numbers crashed after health officials scaled back restrictions at the beginning of June, however, with virtually no COVID fatalities reported in the Scandinavian country throughout July and August. Deaths began to climb again by mid-September, by which time nearly 75 percent of Swedes older than 16 were “fully vaccinated.”

Despite Sweden’s mass vaccination campaign, the recent surge in infections has led to the highest number of COVID-19 cases in Swedish senior care residents since February.
UK Health Safety Agency (UKHSA) released a COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report on October 7 that showed most COVID-19 deaths in UK were among the “fully vaccinated” individuals, as were most hospitalizations in September.

1635366699494.png
1635366741120.png

More from LifeSiteNews:
Between September 6 and October 3, 70 percent of deadly COVID cases occurred in the fully-jabbed, according to the UKHSA data, with 2,281 deaths in “fully vaccinated” people and just 611 in the unvaccinated within 28 days of a positive test. Partially vaccinated people accounted for 98 deaths.

The COVID-19 fatalities among “fully vaccinated” Brits represented a dramatic increase from August, The Exposé observed. Public Health England last month had reported 600 coronavirus deaths in the unvaccinated population between August 9 and September 5 and 1,659 in the doubly-vaccinated.

The latest UKSHA figures also showed that vaccinated patients dominated COVID-19 hospitalizations. 3,910 “fully vaccinated” people were admitted to the hospital for COVID between September 6 and October 3, compared with around 2,400 unvaccinated patients. The fully or partially vaccinated together accounted for roughly 64 percent of total COVID-related hospitalizations.
Other Western countries saw an increase in cases and deaths with “fully vaccinated” individuals including the United States. The Gateway Pundit previously reported Former CDC Director Robert Redfield claimed that more than 40 percent of people who have died from Wuhan coronavirus in the state of Maryland over the last 6-8 weeks were fully vaccinated.
 
Top