ECON Intl/Govt: US joins 11 nations in signing Pacific trade deal

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/268156-us-joins-11-nations-in-signing-pacific-trade-deal

US joins 11 nations in signing Pacific trade deal

By Vicki Needham - 02/03/16 07:35 PM EST

Trade ministers from a dozen nations on Wednesday signed a sweeping Pacific Rim trade agreement, kicking off the next round of intense negotiations between the White House and Congress.

The United States, along with Japan, Canada, Mexico, Australia and New Zealand, joined six other nations in signing the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), calling the agreement an historic deal that will provide far-reaching benefits to their nations.

New Zealand Prime Minister John Key said at the signing ceremony that the TPP “ultimately represents a giant vote of confidence in and optimism for the future prosperity of our economy and our people.”

In a joint statement, the trade ministers who gathered in Auckland, New Zealand, said “our goal is to enhance shared prosperity, create jobs and promote sustainable economic development for all of our nations.”

“The signing of the agreement signals an important milestone and the beginning of the next phase for TPP,” they said.

“Our focus now turns to the completion of our respective domestic processes."

Most of the trading partners said they would aim to pass the deal this year, possibly putting pressure on the United States to pick up the pace.

Congressional lawmakers are calling on the White House to address their concerns about the TPP before they will bring up the agreement for a vote on Capitol Hill.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Tuesday after a meeting with President Obama that he doesn't expect the TPP will get a vote until at least after the November elections.

Meanwhile, last week, Malaysia became the first country to ratify the deal.

U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said at the ceremony he is confident that at the end of the day, because of the benefits to the U.S. economy, members of Congress will have the necessary bipartisan support to pass the agreement.

He also was asked about how he would quell the concerns of detractors of the deal.

"My message is this is an historic agreement and we set out several years ago to negotiate together an ambitious, comprehensive and high-standard agreement and we've done," Froman said.

"This is the product of a diverse set of countries, large and small, developed, developing, Asian, Western Hemispheric countries," he said.

"It reflects our collective view of the appropriate standards for this region."

Several of the trade ministers said the widespread interest from other countries to join the deal is a testament to its strength.

President Obama used the signing to make another push for Congress to move quickly on the agreement.

The president said he would continue working with Democrats and Republicans in Congress to enact the deal as soon as possible “so our economy can immediately start benefiting from the tens of billions of dollars in new export opportunities.”

“We should get TPP done this year and give more American workers the shot at success they deserve and help more American businesses compete and win around the world,” he said.

The nations in the agreement besides the United States are: Malaysia, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore Australia, Canada, Japan, Mexico, Peru and Vietnam.

New Zealand hosted the signing ceremony because the nation was the first to suggest the trade talks about 10 years ago.

Ahead of the signing, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said he is confident the Obama administration and Congress can work together to get the deal done as soon as possible.

“If the administration is prepared to engage with our TPP partners to address congressional concerns, I am confident the TPP agreement can be successfully approved by Congress,” Hatch said on the Senate floor.

But Hatch, who reiterated his doubts about the deal, warned that the process is lengthy — mostly driven by the trade promotion authority law — and that no one should be under any illusion that an up or down vote on the agreement is imminent.

“If history has taught us anything, it’s that this process can, and often does, take a very long time to complete,” Hatch said.

Hatch has expressed concerns about intellectual property protections for high-tech medicines called biologics and a tobacco carve-out that has irked lawmakers in states where the crop is primarily grown.

“In fact, it’s not an exaggeration — or even all that remarkable — to say that it can take years to get an agreement through Congress after it is signed,” he said.

Major business groups are lobbying in support of the TPP but the agreement faces a barrage of opposition from the left and an uphill battle in Congress.

National Corn Growers Association President Chip Bowling on Wednesday called on Congress to pass the deal this year saying that the agreement would “give America’s farmers and ranchers greater access to some of the world’s fastest-growing economies.”

Business Roundtable Chairman Doug Oberhelman, the head of Caterpillar, said “we will continue to call on Congress and the administration to quickly address the remaining industry issues to ensure the agreement provides maximum benefit, which will also enable greater likelihood of congressional approval this year.”

Although Democratic support in Congress for the deal is scant, pro-trade Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said with the signing of the agreement, “our country took a critical step forward in bolstering our relationship with some of the fastest growing economies in the world.”

Opponents of the deal took their shots at the TPP saying they would work non-stop to derail the agreement.

Judit Rius Sanjuan, the U.S. access campaign manager for Doctors Without Borders, said that “the fight to stop this irresponsible trade deal from going into effect is far from over.”

"It's now up to the public to ask their governments whether they’re going to stand for the health of patients and families or the profits of multinational pharmaceutical companies," Sanjuan added.

"The TPP signing today is one step in the process, but efforts to stop the TPP from blocking people’s access to affordable medicines are far from over.”

In 30 locations around the country, as well as in Auckland and other TPP countries, activists held protests Wednesday against the TPP.

AFL-CIO Richard Trumka on Wednesday said that “the TPP agreement is toxic and the American people are not buying it.”

“Working people are determined to end the era of corporate trade deals that lower our wages and kill our jobs,” he added during a press conference on Capitol Hill.

Rep. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) said that “the American people have been left out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership from the beginning and the results show.”

“The American people deserve a better future that empowers our middle class and domestic economy; that protects people and our planet,” she said after helping to deliver 1 million signatures to Congress against the TPP.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said that “when TPP has its day on the Senate floor, I will do all I can to block this agreement, which will hurt workers in my state and across the country.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://thediplomat.com/2016/02/tpp-the-ratification-race-is-on/

TPP: The Ratification Race is On

All eyes will be on the United States (and Japan), which can make or break the massive free trade agreement.

By Catherine Putz
February 05, 2016

7 Shares
2 Comments

With the signing ceremony in Auckland, New Zealand today, the Trans-Pacific Partnership has taken a significant, although symbolic, step forward. The text agreed upon in October 2015 was reached after five years of formal negotiations, which themselves grew out of U.S. negotiations with the four members of the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (Brunei, Chile, Singapore, New Zealand). The TPP includes 12 states (Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States, and Vietnam) which together represent nearly 40 percent of global GDP and a third of world trade. The agreement is perhaps the most comprehensive, if not longest, free trade agreement ever concocted.

At the signing ceremony, New Zealand Prime Minister John Key called the signing “an important step” but noted that the the agreement “is still just a piece of paper, or rather over 16,000 pieces of paper, until it actually comes into force.”

Now the hard part begins: ratification. There are two paths to the TPP coming into force. The first is simple to explain: the TPP will come into force two months after all the original signatories complete their own domestic ratification procedures.

The second route to entry into force is decidedly more likely. As there is significant push back in some signatory countries, it’s reasonable to assume at least one will fail to ratify the agreement. In that event, the agreement can still come into force if at least six countries, which between them represent at least 85 percent of the total GDP of the original 12, have ratified it within two years.

This is the mark everyone will be watching. The TPP will truly be decided between the United States and Japan, which together represent just under 80 percent of the total GDP of the signatories. As Ankit Panda noted in October, “Basically, the TPP can’t come into force if either of these states fail to ratify the agreement in their domestic legislatures because there would be no way for the remaining signatories to fulfill the 85 percent of GDP requirement (even if the United States and all states but Japan ratify, the eleven would stand at 83 percent of GDP).”

And to complicate matters, it’s an election year in the United States. The U.S. Senate is unlikely to tackle the deal until after the November elections. U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters recently, “I have some problems with the agreement.” He went on to advise that discussing the ratification be held off until after the election: “With both the Democratic candidates for president opposed to the deal and a number of presidential candidates in our party opposed to the deal, it is my advice that we not pursue that, certainly before the election.”

That several candidates have made statements in opposition to the TPP is not necessarily an indicator that as president they would stand in its way. Each signatory country has to deal with its own domestic ratification procedures and domestic concerns regarding the broad free trade agreement. As evidenced by the large protests in Auckland during the signing ceremony, there remains much skepticism regarding the deal’s effects, particularly on domestic workers.

In a statement, U.S. President Barack Obama said the deal “allows America – and not countries like China – to write the rules of the road in the 21st century, which is especially important in a region as dynamic as the Asia-Pacific.”
 

Meadowlark

Has No Life - Lives on TB
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

That is the giant sucking sound of our livelihoods going overseas.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
I think if you actually read what Cruz has done on trade, you might change your mind. He opposed the original TPA (Trade Promotion Authority) bill as it provided a back door to amnesty and continued approval of the Ex Im Bank. He and Senator Sessions offered an amendment accordingly. (BTW, TPA, or Fast Track authority has been granted to President's since FDR. It allows them to negotiate a trade deal and then bring it to the Senate for an up or down vote without Amendments. You can see that if this were not in place, no deals would be made as trade partners would see this as negotiating in bad faith if the Senate could just change the agreement.) He voted in favor of a cleaned up bill and he voted to give the TPP Fast Track status..

As I understand it, no vote has yet been taken on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal by the Senate. Cruz is among the few that has actually read the full text of the deal. Cruz, and the Senate, have not yet ratified the Agreement on an up or down vote.
 

Sacajawea

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Given the level of secrecy about just what the agreement agrees to - the American people sure haven't been told and senators can only read it under the strictest secrecy - I am against the agreement on principle. I don't trust the people who have been negotiating to just commit the US en toto, to something I'm supposedly not smart enough to understand and instead, be asked to just trust them.

How can I ask my representatives to represent my yes/no on the deal... if I'm not privy to what the deal consists of?
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Bigger and More Dangerous Than ObamaCare


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHYlZb65gVY


William F. Jasper, Senior Editor for The New American magazine, explains how President Obama's Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is an "an all-out assault on our national sovereignty," and how It would unconstitutionally transfer legislative powers from the U.S. Congress, our state legislatures, and our city and county governments to multi-national corporations and unaccountable international bureaucrats at the World Trade Organization, or WTO. Incredibly, it also would transfer judicial powers from our federal and state courts — which are bad enough — to globalist TPP judges at regional tribunals and the WTO.
 
Top