ECON How much of the World is ditching the Dollar as reserve currency (and what it might mean for us)

jward

passin' thru
Yuan overtakes dollar to become most-used currency in China's cross-border transactions

SHANGHAI, April 26 (Reuters) - The yuan became the most widely-used currency for cross-border transactions in China in March, overtaking the dollar for the first time, official data showed, reflecting efforts by Beijing to internationalise use of the yuan.

Cross-border payments and receipts in yuan rose to a record $549.9 billion in March from $434.5 billion a month earlier, according to Reuters calculation based on data from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange.


The yuan was used in 48.4% of all cross-border transactions, Reuters calculated, while the dollar's share declined to 46.7% from 48.6% a month earlier.

The volume of cross-border transactions covers both the current and capital accounts.

China has long been promoting the use of yuan to settle cross-border trades as part of an efforts to internationalise the use of its currency.

The yuan's use in global trade finance remains low, though it has shown steady increases.


Data from SWIFT showed that the yuan's share of global currency transactions for trade finance rose to 4.5% in March, while the dollar accounted for 83.71%.

Reporting by Jindong Zhang, Winni Zhou and Tom Westbrook
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
 

jward

passin' thru

China's small steps on offshore use of yuan are starting to add up​


4 minute read
April 27, 2023
11:41 AM CDT
Last Updated 4 hours ago​



[1/2] An employee counts yuan banknotes at a branch of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) in Huaibei, Anhui province February 17, 2011. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo
SINGAPORE, April 27 (Reuters) - China's yuan currency is slowly but surely being adopted for more international payments, which analysts say could lay foundations for a trade system running parallel to the dominant U.S. dollar.
In the past day alone, data showed that more cross-border transactions with China were settled in yuan in March than in dollars for the first time, and that Argentina said it aims to regularly pay for Chinese goods in yuan and not dollars.
While the dollar dominates world trade settlements, the news comes amid a steady drumbeat of more and more bilateral deals arranging yuan payments with China -- from Chinese oil purchases in the Middle East to trade with partners from Brazil to Russia.

True global yuan adoption is unlikely, given expectations that Beijing will want to keep a tight grip on the currency. But incremental progress is already fashioning a new trade architecture and is gaining pace, particularly as Russia's expulsion from much of the West's payment systems has accelerated the development of alternatives.
"The world's largest commodity exporters and importers - China, Russia and Brazil - are now working together on using renminbi for cross-border payments," said Chi Lo, senior investment strategist at BNP Paribas Asset Management in Hong Kong.

"Their cooperation could draw other countries to renminbi payments over time and cumulatively, this group could lift the renminbi at the expense of the dollar," he said.
China has long sought to increase the yuan's undersized 2.2% share of global payments, but seemingly without being willing to open its capital accounts and allow the sort of free-flowing movement that makes dollars, euros and yen so convenient.
Russia's war on Ukraine, and the resulting Western sanctions, has given substance to the push. Suddenly, Russia has come from virtually nowhere to become the fourth-largest yuan-trading hub outside China.
The yuan's share of Russia's currency market has leapt to 40% to 45%, from less than 1% at the start of last year. Its share of world trade financing, according to SWIFT, has increased to 4.5% in February from 1.3% two years ago. The dollar's is 84%.

"It will not replace the U.S. dollar globally, but it is already starting to replace the dollar in some of China’s trade relationships," said Gerard DiPippo and Andrea Leonard Palazzi, economists at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies, in an article last week.
"This kind of renminbi internationalisation may achieve Beijing's goals, including reducing China’s exposure to exchange rate fluctuations and mitigating China’s vulnerabilities to U.S. financial sanctions."

SLOW MOVING​

World trade flows are dominated by dollars, euros, sterling and yen because those currencies are freely available and connected to open economies in ways the capital-controlled yuan is not. To be sure, there are no signs that is changing.
"In most trades, importers have a comparative advantage in determining the terms of trades, such as pricing and settlement currency," says Zhang Yu, chief macro analyst at Huachuang Securities in Beijing.
"Therefore, if exporters want to use yuan to settle trades, they must persuade foreign importers to pay in yuan, which often takes a long time."
China itself needs time to create depth in a limited pool of yuan outside its shores, which is less easy for Beijing to control.

"For yuan usage to grow in scale it make take 10 years or longer," says Andre Wheeler, chief executive of supply chain, trade risk consultancy Wheeler Management Consulting based in Australia.
"If they were to try to change Australia iron ore trades to be settled in yuan, I don’t think China would be able to cope with that scale."
Yet the yuan offers other attractions to China's trading partners. In Argentina's case, buying goods in yuan saves draining dwindling dollar reserves. More broadly, each new adopter adds to a currency system's depth and usefulness.
"One of the many reasons for using the dollar is what we call network effects," said Michael Pettis, senior fellow at Carnegie China.

"The more of us that use it, the cheaper it becomes to use and the more efficient it becomes to use," he said.
"By trying to force more and more of its trade into renminbi, Beijing is trying to create network effects that will make use of the renminbi for trade that much easier and with lower frictional costs."
Reporting by Tom Westbrook, additional reporting by Samuel Shen and Winni Zhou in Shanghai, Georgina Lee in Hong Kong Editing by Vidya Ranganathan and Kim Coghill

 

West

Senior
Maybe we should penalize employers even more and make manufacturers, fabrication, mining, logging, etc. go out of business by over-regulation and more frivolous lawsuits.
Will strengthen our dollar?

What do we have to export anymore? Not as much as we did in the 50s, 60s and at the peak 70s-80s.

Wonder if there's a connection there?
 

jward

passin' thru
Well when your "friends" hate you and your "rulers" do also, even more so, there probably is a connection between the horrible policies and the destruction that they bring the guilty and innocent alike.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
The world has no use for the ZUSA any more.
=====================

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cikDZNNBOy8

Jim Willie: BRICS Are Driving Dollar & Precious Metals Markets
RT 37:03

38,716 views Premiered Apr 26, 2023 #BRICS #PreciousMetals #JimWillie
#JimWillie: #BRICS Are Driving Dollar & #PreciousMetals Markets

The de-dollarization movement led by the BRICS nations is seemingly accelerating by the day, with new non-dollar trade arrangements being launched on a regular basis, while the list of countries wanting to join the BRICS also continues to increase.

So in today's call, Dr, Jim Willie of The Hat Trick letter joins me again on the show to share the latest developments he's witnessing, and how new exchanges are being set up around the globe to trade assets like gold and treasuries.

Jim also talks about how the silver market fits into the overall picture, and why there's been so much resistance for silver at the $30 level. He describes the precarious position that he believes the COMEX will find itself in as the precious metals trading becomes more decentralized, and the ultimate effect that will have on the system.

So to find out more from the latest research of Jim Willie, click to watch this video now!
 
Last edited:

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3DSKaR-upg

Rafi Farber: A Temporary Debt Ceiling Default Could Collapse the Whole System
RT 19:51

3,502 views Premiered 2 hours ago #RafiFarber #silver #silverprice
#RafiFarber - A Temporary Debt Ceiling Default Could Collapse the Whole System

Short term Treasury markets are predicting a temporary debt ceiling breach as the spread between 1M and 3M yields has blown up to the highest level ever this week.

That means short term money is piling into the most liquid and short term maturity, a clear sign of panic on the front even of the curve.

And while a temporary debt default is acknowledged as possible, what very few people understand is that even a temporary default of a few days has the power to collapse the entire financial system.

To find out more, click the video now!
 

hiwall

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Doom, Doom, Doom
I predict CONgress will raise the debt limit to $84 trillion and life will go on.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
In anything economic, the 'what' is pretty easy to predict. The 'when' is the killer.

BRICS are a real thing. They are planning to toss us under the bus. They are getting ready to do just that. The rest of the world is fine with that.
=========

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALXKKWsbRbQ

The Cheapest Civilized Country in the World
RT 23:09

4,350 views Apr 28, 2023 Doug Casey's Take
#Dougcasey #argentina #inflation #hyperinflation #crisis #investing
Doug Casey tells us which nation is the cheapest civilized country in the world. He's talking about Argentina.
Inflation is getting out of control and if you only earn and save in pesos life can be miserable. And it's true that
 
Last edited:

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment

Rickards: We're Our Own Worst Enemy
BY TYLER DURDEN
WEDNESDAY, APR 26, 2023 - 12:05 PM
Authored by James Rickards via DailyReckoning.com,

It’s a fact of life that in any group of students, some are likely to be smarter and quicker than others while some just can’t keep up.

It’s unfortunate that Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has turned out to be the slow kid in the class when it comes to economic sanctions and financial warfare.



Almost 10 years ago, I sat in a secure conference room at the Pentagon and explained to a group of U.S. national security officials from the military, CIA, Treasury and other agencies that the overuse of the U.S. dollar in financial warfare would eventually drive countries away from using dollars in international transactions for fear that they could become the next target of U.S. displeasure.

Some took note, some ignored the warning and one Treasury official slammed the table and said, “The dollar has been the global reserve currency, it is the global reserve currency now and it always will be the global reserve currency!”

I told him I felt like I was in Whitehall in London in 1913 listening to John Bull say the same thing about sterling. Sterling would begin to be pushed aside by the dollar just one year later with the start of World War I.

We’re Our Own Worst Enemy
More recently, I taught a seminar at the U.S. Army War College on financial warfare in which I explained that U.S. financial sanctions would not have a material impact on Russia, that Russia would not change its behavior in Ukraine based on the sanctions and that the U.S. would suffer more from its own sanctions than Russia because adversaries and neutral countries would create alternative payment platforms that did not use dollars.

I encountered skepticism from the class (that’s OK; the purpose of a seminar is to engender competing views).

I’ve said to the military and intelligence community, “I don’t think other countries can destroy the dollar, but we can do it ourselves. We are our own worst enemy.”

We, of course, meaning the United States. We’re destroying the dollar with the sanctions (and through other misguided policies). The U.S. is doing more to destroy the dollar than our enemies.

Events of the past year have proved my forecast in every respect.

Many others have pointed out the same weaknesses in the weaponization of the dollar. It seems the only parties who didn’t see the danger to the dollar were the Wall Street cheerleaders and top U.S. government officials.

Russia Has Been Preparing for This
Russia saw all this coming, and has been preparing accordingly.

In 2009. Russia’s gold reserves were about 600 tons. By the time the sanctions were imposed in 2022, Russia’s gold reserves were close to 3,000 tons. They had spent that 13-year period acquiring 2,400 metric tons of gold.

If you think that’s easy, it isn’t. It’s not easy at all to acquire anywhere near that amount of gold. But they were like Steady Eddie, The Little Engine That Could.

They bought 10 to 30 tons per month like clockwork, about 250 tons a year, sometimes more, sometimes less, but over 13 years they got to that 3,000-ton level.

They’re very transparent about it. But they were anticipating financial warfare from the U.S. and its allies.

So when the sanctions were imposed, Russia’s total reserves were approximately $600 billion, but almost 25% of that, about $150 billion, was in gold. And I’m talking about actual gold bullion held in safe storage in Russia, not gold futures contracts or ETFs because they’re just as easy to freeze as any other asset.

That was not a complete answer to the sanctions they were facing, but it was a very substantial move in the direction of insulating themselves from being kicked out of the dollar system.

Well, all I can say is that I warned the Pentagon about this in 2009 when I conducted financial war games. I also wrote about it in my book Currency Wars, which came out in 2011. Now it’s all playing out before our eyes. China, of course, has been doing the same thing as Russia to escape dollar dominance.

Could the Russian Economy Outperform the U.S. Economy This Year?
Incidentally, Russia’s growth should be higher than the United States this year, believe it or not. Russia’s estimated by the IMF to grow slightly less than 3%. And the U.S.? We’re probably already in recession, so we won’t get anywhere near 3%.

Meanwhile, Russian oil exports are higher than ever.

Russia’s buying high-tech goods from China, including some military hardware and other manufactured goods. China’s buying Russian oil and natural gas, in addition to agricultural output and weapons. That’s a big two-way trade, and the dollar isn’t being used. Russia’s paying yuan, and China’s paying rubles.

Now, the failure of U.S. dollar-based sanctions has become too obvious to ignore. The failure is so obvious that even Janet Yellen admits that sanctions are not working.

She recently said, “There is a risk when we use financial sanctions that are linked to the role of the dollar that over time it could undermine the hegemony of the dollar. Of course, it does create a desire on the part of China, of Russia, of Iran to find an alternative.”

One could say that realizing the dangers ten years too late is still better late than never.

Why the Dollar Hasn’t Tanked — Yet
The issue is whether it’s already too late to undo the damage. Once new trading currencies and new payment channels are put in place (which is happening quickly), there’s little incentive to go back to a dollar system where the U.S. can threaten your economy.

I should add that there are reasons why the dollar is strong today that have nothing to do with what I’ve been discussing. It has to do with the banking crisis (that’s far from over, by the way). There’s high demand for dollar-denominated collateral, particularly short-term Treasury bills. That’ll break at some point, but not yet.

And so, the dollar is being propped up by the demand for dollar-denominated collateral, even though it’s under attack from all sides based on these new payment currency alternatives that are rapidly emerging.

Yellen is once again putting her incompetence on full display. She’s a textbook neo-Keynesian with little understanding of monetary policy, fiscal policy, or the international monetary system.

I’ve consistently said that the greatest threat to the dollar comes not from abroad but from the U.S. Treasury because they take confidence in the dollar for granted. We’re doing this to ourselves.

Yellen is proving my point.
 

jward

passin' thru

Bretton Woods 2.0: A Global Monetary System for a Multipolar World​


by Ville Korpela​


Earlier this month, I had the privilege of participating in the conversations held in the various lounges and side events connected to the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. One topic was on everyone’s lips, from the official sessions at the Congress Center to the late-hour conversations at Hotel Europe’s Piano Bar: decoupling between the United States and China. This decoupling can be described using the metaphor of Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities. In the classic book, the two cities of Paris and London are depicted as vastly different from one another, yet connected through the tumultuous events of the French Revolution. Similarly, the United States and China, closely interconnected through trade and investment only several years ago, are now moving in separate directions as tensions rise and their relationship becomes increasingly fraught. Chinese vice premier Liu He warned against the “Cold War mindset” at Davos, but he failed to convince the world that Beijing is back. Just the title of this year’s gathering, “Cooperation in a fragmented world,” spoke volumes about the state of play in global affairs.

Just as the French Revolution in 1789 created a divide between Paris and London, trade tensions and geopolitical disputes between the United States and China are resulting in the decoupling of the two of the world’s largest economies. This global divide is defined by a growing sense of mistrust between the two economic engines of global trade.

The Bretton Woods system, established in the ruins of a world left devastated by World War II, was a set of international monetary arrangements that aimed to promote economic stability and growth by linking national currencies to the U.S. dollar and fixing exchange rates. In a multipolar world, the Bretton Woods system faces several challenges, including
  • U.S. dollar dependency: The system is heavily dependent on the stability of the U.S. dollar, and fluctuations or disorderly devaluations in its value could have major impacts on other currencies and the global economy.
  • Limited adaptability: The fixed exchange rate regime can’t easily adjust to changes in the global economy and will often lead to imbalances and trade conflicts.
  • Unequal economic growth: The Bretton Woods system was designed for a world dominated by two major powers, the United States and the Soviet Union. In a multipolar world with multiple centers of power, such a system will struggle to accommodate diverse levels and systems of economic growth and development.
  • Increased monetary competition: The rise of China and Russia’s pullout from the global financial system, together with increased monetary competition, has made it more difficult for the United States to maintain its dominant position in the global monetary system.
  • Inadequate response to crises: The system has been criticized for its inability to respond effectively to economic shocks and crises, such as the oil crisis of the 1970s.
The systemic challenges faced by the Bretton Woods institutions in a multipolar world have contributed to its gradual decline and calls for a shift toward a new diverse and inclusive global monetary system, in which the various regions can come together to agree on a common playbook and rules of engagement. With the old order on the retreat, the new order is yet to take its final form, but we are beginning to see signs of the shape of things to come.
The reluctance of developing countries to accept the “Washington consensus” can be seen as a rejection of the old system and its shortcomings. The economic paradigms that have dominated the post-World War II era are no longer seen as relevant or effective in a rapidly changing and highly volatile multipolar world, and developing countries are seeking new ways to promote stability and growth that take into account their unique challenges and needs.

Where the World Islands Come Into Play
The notorious Russian political analyst Alexander Dugin has coined a theory of world geography known as the theory of World Islands. It is based on the idea that the world can be divided into several distinct cultural and political spheres, or "islands," each with its own unique characteristics and history. According to Dugin, these islands have distinct cultural and political identities and are defined by the way they relate to each other and to the world at large.
Dugin, sometimes described as the ideological mastermind behind Putin’s Russia, has argued that these islands will be organized into a hierarchy, with the West at the top and other regions, such as Russia, China, and the Islamic world, lower down. Dugin argues that the world is undergoing a profound transformation, with the rise of new powers and the decline of the West, and that this shift will have major implications for the future of the world. He believes that the world is moving away from a unipolar order dominated by the West and toward a multipolar order in which the various world islands will have greater autonomy and influence.

Currently, we are seeing several world islands appearing, with the United States leading the united West, although occasional cracks in the transatlantic bond are emerging over trade issues and protectionist policies on both sides of the Atlantic. Russia was kicked out of the Western financial system and has been forced to develop its own system or integrate its payment systems with China’s. Africa remains largely a question mark, with one of the panelists at the Davos Africa House reminding the audience that it is still more difficult for most Africans to visit neighboring countries than it is for foreigners. We see similar islands, or varying standards, emerging in the sphere of digital technologies.

The Future Is Both Digital and Backed by Real Assets
Fintech, or financial technology, may play a significant role in shaping the form and structure of the future global monetary system. The innovative use of technology through collaborative investment and finance platforms has the potential to reach populations that have been excluded from traditional financial services and to increase access to financial services for areas that haven’t benefited from being part of the Washington Consensus. Fintech solutions often use digital infrastructure and low-cost operating models to provide financial services at lower costs, making them accessible to a wider range of customers. Fintech has also opened up new forms of finance, such as crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending, allowing everyone to become their own banker. The recent crash of cryptocurrencies has revealed the weakness of fintech solutions that aren’t backed by real assets.

Thus, it is crucial that the new global monetary system be backed by real assets, as such a system can provide greater stability and build confidence in high-volatility environments. Stability has become the new alpha that investors are seeking. Real assets are tangible items such as gold or real estate that have intrinsic value and are not subject to the same fluctuations and uncertainties as other forms of currency. Currencies backed by real assets are seen as more trustworthy and reliable, as their value is directly linked to the value of the underlying assets. Digital assets backed by real assets can also provide a powerful hedge against inflation. As the global economy is looking for more real asset-based solutions, the question then becomes: how do we bring the fragmented world together to discuss the common rules of the game, and where should such a meeting take place?
Will Bretton Woods 2.0 Be Based In the Gulf?
The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries are a natural choice to bring nations together in a multipolar world to discuss the future of the global monetary system. This is due to their role as bridge builders and their diplomatic efforts to become platforms for conversation around the future direction of global development and leadership, signified by the recent Dubai Expo 2020 and the 2022 FIFA World Cup held in Qatar, together with the United Arab Emirates’ upcoming chairmanship of the COP28 climate conference.

The GCC countries have a long history of serving as intermediaries between nations and have established the region as a hub for economic, political, and cultural exchange. Strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Asia, and Africa, the GCC states have significant geopolitical influence in the wider region, making the Gulf well-suited to serve as a future platform for international collaboration and cooperation. The GCC countries have strong diplomatic ties with nations around the world and have a reputation for serving as neutral intermediaries in conflicts and disputes. While Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has called neutrality ‘immoral’ in the light of the war in Ukraine, the reality of our world is that when the war ends—and all wars eventually end—there will be a Ukraine and there will be a Russia, and they will have to learn to live with each other again.

Even the fragmented world needs its meeting places. During World War II, there was the Bank for International Settlements, where the warring parties could still come together to discuss both outstanding commercial issues and the future of the global order after the war. Similarly, the Gulf is uniquely positioned to bring the parts of the world that are not talking to each other back together and map out the architecture of the future global monetary system.

 

Zagdid

Veteran Member

India building 7,200 km transport corridor to counter China's BRI​

The 7,200 km long International North South Transport Corridor (INSTC) connecting India and Russia is now rapidly coming to life after remaining a slow starter for years


3 min read Last Updated : May 01 2023 | 3:15 AM IST

New Delhi, May 1: The 7,200 km long International North South Transport Corridor (INSTC) connecting India and Russia is now rapidly coming to life after remaining a slow starter for years. Next month a host of fresh agreements is set to be inked at the international economic forum to be held at Kazan, a city located in southwest Russia. The agreements are expected to eliminate the current operational roadblocks.

With India and Russia determined to strengthen bilateral economic activities including trade amid the changing geopolitical dynamics, the thrust on the corridor changing geopolitical dynamics has gone up.

'We intend to sign a bunch of supplemental agreements, first of all on transport services. We have the North-South corridor, where we plan to reach Iran and India via Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and via Azerbaijan. We will ink several agreements in this sphere,' news agency TASS quoted Russian Deputy Prime Minister Marat Khusnullin as saying.

Last week, a 50-member Indian business delegation were in Russia to explore further opportunities to boost trade between the two countries, which are also in talks for a free trade agreement.
 

Mark D

Now running for Emperor.
I’ve consistently said that the greatest threat to the dollar comes not from abroad but from the U.S. Treasury because they take confidence in the dollar for granted. We’re doing this to ourselves.

Yellen is proving my point.
Exactly.
 

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________
This all works until China decides to stop keep the value of the yuan artificially low. By then however we may be into a literal WW3 rather than the figurative one we have now.
 

SageRock

Veteran Member
Fair use cited. Press release from the website of the U.S. Treasury Department.

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1454

Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen Sends Letter to Congressional Leadership on the Debt Limit​


May 1, 2023

WASHINGTON - Today, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen sent a letter to all members of Congressional leadership regarding the debt limit.

The full text of the letter can be found here and is available below.


The Honorable Kevin McCarthy
Speaker
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515


Dear Mr. Speaker:

I am writing to follow up on my previous letters regarding the debt limit and to provide additional information regarding the Treasury Department’s ability to continue to finance the operations of the federal government.

In my January 13 letter, I noted that it was unlikely that cash and extraordinary measures would be exhausted before early June. After reviewing recent federal tax receipts, our best estimate is that we will be unable to continue to satisfy all of the government’s obligations by early June, and potentially as early as June 1, if Congress does not raise or suspend the debt limit before that time. This estimate is based on currently available data, as federal receipts and outlays are inherently variable, and the actual date that Treasury exhausts extraordinary measures could be a number of weeks later than these estimates.

It is impossible to predict with certainty the exact date when Treasury will be unable to pay the government’s bills, and I will continue to update Congress in the coming weeks as more information becomes available. Given the current projections, it is imperative that Congress act as soon as possible to increase or suspend the debt limit in a way that provides longer-term certainty that the government will continue to make its payments.

Additionally, Treasury is suspending the issuance of State and Local Government Series (SLGS) Treasury securities. SLGS are special-purpose Treasury securities issued to states and municipalities to help them comply with certain tax rules. When Treasury issues SLGS, they count against the debt limit. Treasury will take this action to manage the risks associated with the debt limit, but it is not without costs, as it will deprive state and local governments of an important tool to manage their finances.

We have learned from past debt limit impasses that waiting until the last minute to suspend or increase the debt limit can cause serious harm to business and consumer confidence, raise short-term borrowing costs for taxpayers, and negatively impact the credit rating of the United States. If Congress fails to increase the debt limit, it would cause severe hardship to American families, harm our global leadership position, and raise questions about our ability to defend our national security interests.

I respectfully urge Congress to protect the full faith and credit of the United States by acting as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Janet L. Yellen
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I’ve said to the military and intelligence community, “I don’t think other countries can destroy the dollar, but we can do it ourselves. We are our own worst enemy.”


Except We didn't do it.

Done in our name, perhaps...
 

SageRock

Veteran Member
If you receive income from the federal government, or if you receive income from other people who depend on federal payments, it is time to dust off "Plan B."
 

West

Senior
If you receive income from the federal government, or if you receive income from other people who depend on federal payments, it is time to dust off "Plan B."

You mean I shouldn't count on another stimulus?

I just told the new truck lot that I'll use the next stimulus for a down payment.

Grr....

:D
 

jward

passin' thru

South Korea, Indonesia c.banks agree to promote local currency transactions​


1 minute read
May 1, 2023
8:09 PM CDT
Last Updated 3 hours ago

~1 minute



SEOUL, May 2 (Reuters) - The central banks of South Korea and Indonesia signed a memorandum of understanding on Tuesday to cooperate on promoting the use of their currencies for bilateral transactions, such as current account transactions and direct investment.
The cooperation will help businesses reduce their transaction costs and exposure to exchange rate risks by enabling the direct exchange rate quotation between the Korean won and the Indonesian rupiah in interbank trading, the central banks said in a joint statement.
The agreement was signed by the governors of the two central banks on the sidelines of the ASEAN+3 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting in Incheon, South Korea.
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB

South Korea, Indonesia c.banks agree to promote local currency transactions​


1 minute read
May 1, 2023
8:09 PM CDT
Last Updated 3 hours ago

~1 minute



SEOUL, May 2 (Reuters) - The central banks of South Korea and Indonesia signed a memorandum of understanding on Tuesday to cooperate on promoting the use of their currencies for bilateral transactions, such as current account transactions and direct investment.
The cooperation will help businesses reduce their transaction costs and exposure to exchange rate risks by enabling the direct exchange rate quotation between the Korean won and the Indonesian rupiah in interbank trading, the central banks said in a joint statement.
The agreement was signed by the governors of the two central banks on the sidelines of the ASEAN+3 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting in Incheon, South Korea.


Isn't this how an avalanche starts?
 

jward

passin' thru
The Kobeissi Letter
@KobeissiLetter
11m

JUST IN: Pakistan is using Chinese Yuan to purchase 750,000 barrels of Russian crude oil.

Following the delivery of the first shipment, regular deliveries are expected to commence.

Their decision to use Chinese Yuan is said to be part of ongoing BRICS de-dollarization efforts.
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I posted a vid on another thread that may have some info relevent here...


eta: it's the one after the link above; I am not sure why that's happening...

In it, a 30-year Trader discusses the challenges facing banks, the US financial system, and discusses hedges which may assist...

It's long at over 50 minutes, but I was able to absorb most of it at 1.5x, and he had some very interesting points, particularly about his theory that BTC could function like a CDS against inflation / Sovereign debt default.
 

jward

passin' thru

US debt default could quickly trigger dollar’s collapse​


Michael Humphries​




Congressional leaders at loggerheads over a debt ceiling impasse sat down with President Joe Biden on May 9, 2023, as the clock ticks down to a potentially catastrophic default if nothing is done by the end of the month.
Republicans, who regained control of the House of Representatives in November 2022, are threatening not to allow an increase in the debt limit unless they get spending cuts and regulatory rollbacks in return, which they outlined in a bill passed in April 2023. In so doing, they risk pushing the US government into default.
It feels a lot like a case of deja vu all over again.
Brinkmanship over the debt ceiling has become a regular ritual – it happened under the Clinton administration in 1995, then again with Barack Obama as president in 2011, and more recently in 2021.
Defaulting on the national debt would have real-life consequences. Even the threat of pushing the US into default has an economic impact.
In August 2021, the mere prospect of a potential default led to an unprecedented downgrade of the the nation’s credit rating, hurting America’s financial prestige as well as countless individuals, including retirees.
And that was caused by the mere specter of default. An actual default would be far more damaging.

Dollar’s demise​

Possibly the most serious consequence would be the collapse of the US dollar and its replacement as global trade’s “unit of account.” That essentially means that it is widely used in global finance and trade.
Day to day, most Americans are likely unaware of the economic and political power that goes with being the world’s unit of account. Currently, more than half of world trade – from oil and gold to cars and smartphones – is in US dollars, with the euro accounting for around 30% and all other currencies making up the balance.

As a result of this dominance, the US is the only country on the planet that can pay its foreign debt in its own currency. This gives both the US government and American companies tremendous leeway in international trade and finance.
No matter how much debt the US government owes foreign investors, it can simply print the money needed to pay them back – although for economic reasons, it may not be wise to do so.
Other countries must buy either the dollar or the euro to pay their foreign debt. And the only way for them to do so is either to export more than they import or borrow more dollars or euros on the international market.
The US is free from such constraints and can run up large trade deficits – that is, import more than it exports – for decades without the same consequences.

For American companies, the dominance of the dollar means they’re not as subject to the exchange rate risk as are their foreign competitors. Exchange rate risk refers to how changes in the relative value of currencies may affect a company’s profitability.
Since international trade is generally denominated in dollars, US businesses can buy and sell in their own currency, something their foreign competitors cannot do as easily. As simple as this sounds, it gives American companies a tremendous competitive advantage.
If Republicans push the US into default, the dollar would likely lose its position as the international unit of account, forcing the government and companies to pay their international bills in another currency.
Kevin McCarthy., left, Chuck Schumer, right, and President Joe Biden meet at the White House on May 9, 2023. Photo: AP via The Conversation / Evan Vucci

The dollar’s dominance means trade must go through an American bank at some point. This is one important way it gives the US tremendous political power, especially to punish economic rivals and unfriendly governments.
For example, when former President Donald Trump imposed economic sanctions on Iran, he denied the country access to American banks and to the dollar. He also imposed secondary sanctions, which means that non-American companies trading with Iran were also sanctioned.
Given a choice of access to the dollar or trading with Iran, most of the world economies chose access to the dollar and complied with the sanctions. As a result, Iran entered a deep recession, and its currency plummeted about 30%.
US President Joe Biden did something similar against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine. Limiting Russia’s access to the dollar has helped push the country into a recession that’s bordering on a depression.
No other country today could unilaterally impose this level of economic pain on another country. And all an American president currently needs is a pen.

Rivals rewarded​

Another consequence of the dollar’s collapse would be enhancing the position of the US’s top rival for global influence: China.
While the euro would likely replace the dollar as the world’s primary unit of account, the Chinese yuan would move into second place.
If the yuan were to become a significant international unit of account, this would enhance China’s international position both economically and politically.
As it is, China has been working with the other BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia and India – to accept the yuan as a unit of account. With the other three already resentful of US economic and political dominance, a US default would support that effort.
They may not be alone: Recently, Saudi Arabia suggested it was open to trading some of its oil in currencies other than the dollar – something that would change long-standing policy.
China’s yuan would gain for any collapse in the US dollar. Photo: Facebook

Beyond the impact on the dollar and the economic and political clout of the US, a default would be profoundly felt in many other ways and by countless people.
In the US, tens of millions of Americans and thousands of companies that depend on government support could suffer, and the economy would most likely sink into recession – or worse, given the US is already expected to soon suffer a downturn. In addition, retirees could see the worth of their pensions dwindle.
The truth is, we really don’t know what will happen or how bad it will get. The scale of the damage caused by a US default is hard to calculate in advance because it has never happened before.

But there’s one thing we can be certain of. If Republicans take their threat of default too far, the US and Americans will suffer tremendously.
Michael Humphries is Deputy Chair of Business Administration, Touro University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
 

jward

passin' thru

Why de-dollarizing Egypt is easier said than done? - Economy - Business​





Related​

The announcement came as part of a global and local movement to shed the USD as the world’s currency franca for trade in the wake of the Federal Reserve’s series of interest rate hikes since 2022, meant to tackle soaring inflation and resulting in a stronger dollar.
That muscular dollar has hurt many economies around the world, including Egypt, which suffered immense pressure on its currency, leading it to lose over 75 percent of its value since March 2022, and a spiralled inflation that peaked at 33.9 percent in March 2023 before easing for the first time in almost a year in April.
While Egypt seeks to find a solution to its USD shortage and reduce dependence on the greenback, abandoning the dollar for imports of basic commodities may not be currently a practical or effective strategy due to Egypt's large trade deficits.
Experts agree that for Egypt to realistically pursue de-dollarisation, major changes in the international financial system and increased acceptance of alternative currencies have to be introduced first.

Trade imbalance

"For countries to apply trade exchange using their respective currencies, a major change in the global economic and financial system is required. These countries must also maintain equal imports and exports to prevent a surplus of currencies that cannot be utilized in trade with other countries,” Ahmed Khattab, a financial analyst, said.
"For instance, India's trade deficit with Russia reached approximately $34.7 billion between April 2022 and January 2023. If India were to export goods to Russia in rupees, that means that Russia would accumulate a significant surplus of over 2.8 trillion rupees that cannot be utilized in trade with other nations,” Khattab explained.

“In that scenario, India would not possess more goods to export to Russia to make up for that imbalance.
"However, for Egypt, which already faces a substantial trade deficit, receiving payments for exports in rupees, yuans, rubles, or other currencies could have an adverse impact and reduce the country's USD supply,” he noted.
Egypt’s non-oil trade balance deficit reached $17.3 billion in H1 FY 2022/2023, according to the Central Bank of Egypt (CBE).

Why the dollar?​

"If major economies reach a consensus and demonstrate willingness to embrace de-dollarisation and utilize their respective currencies in bilateral trade, they must achieve a surge in trade exchange between them to cover any trade imbalance, and that would have a positive impact on their economies,” Khattab suggested.

"The global acceptance of the USD stems from the Federal Reserve System being transparent in all of its operations, which makes the world trust in the currency for trade and international reserve accumulation,” he stated.
Elaborating on the transparency issue, the analyst added: "However, the People's Bank of China and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation exhibit less transparency in their monetary and exchange rate policies. They extensively intervene in the foreign exchange market to maintain their currencies at specific values."

Mohamed El-Beih, a banking expert, pointed out that "currencies such as the yuan, rupee, or ruble are not widely-accepted reserve currencies, limiting Egypt's ability to utilize them except in trade with the issuing countries."
"Most global trade exchanges are carried out in USD. The greenback is also used in the valuation of key goods in almost all commodity exchanges worldwide. Hence, if Russia or India, for instance, were to sell wheat to Egypt in their currencies, they would price their exports based on the USD,” said El-Beih.

BRICS' new currency initiative

"BRICS countries have not yet succeeded in abandoning the USD in their trade. They continue to use it alongside the euro for the valuation of commodities,” he added.
Egypt seeks to join the BRICS bloc of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, which is an important grouping bringing together the major emerging economies in the world.
Egypt's President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi approved in March an agreement establishing BRICS' New Development Bank (NDB) and allowing Egypt to join the bank.

El-Sisi participated in two BRICS summits, in 2017 and 2022, when Egypt was invited as a guest to the BRICS Plus High-Level Dialogue in June.
Last month, in New Delhi, Alexander Babakov, deputy chairman of Russia’s State Duma, announced that Russia was spearheading the development of a new currency to be used for cross-border trade among BRICS nations.
Further discussions regarding the development of the new currency are anticipated to take place at the BRICS Summit in South Africa in August 2023.
“Such a move, nevertheless cannot succeed without a global shift towards reducing dependence on the USD in either pricing and trade of strategic commodities,” El-Beih commented.

Egypt's trade with USD alternatives​

Russia, China, and India are offering their currencies as alternatives to the USD in trade. But, given Egypt's substantial trade deficit with the three countries, it raises the question of whether Egypt would benefit from using their currencies in trade.
According to the Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS), Egypt's Exports to Russia recorded $449.5 million in 2022, while imports from Russia reached $3.7 billion in the same year.
Non-oil trade between Egypt and India during the first 11 months of 2022 totalled $4.1 billion, Minister of Trade and Industry Ahmed Samir stated in a meeting with Indian Ambassador to Cairo Ajit Gupte in January.
Egyptian exports accounted for $723 million, the minister noted.
Trade between Egypt and China increased by 2.6 percent to $14.9 billion during the first 11 months of 2022, up from $14.5 billion a year earlier.
Egyptian exports to China amounted to $1.7 billion in the same period, while imports stood at $13.2 billion.
Short link:
 

jward

passin' thru

India: Another Demonetization?​


by Tyler Durden​


Authored by Jayant Bhandari via LewRockwell.com,
In late 2016, the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, came on TV at 8 pm to announce that most currency bills would no longer be legal tender after midnight. An individual was allowed to convert only about $30 per visit to the bank. This led to massive crowds (not lineups, because Indians don’t follow the lineup system) at the banks, suffering, chaos, and deaths—there were no exceptions for the sick, older people, and pregnant women.

Eventually, more than 100% of the demonetized cash returned to the banks, although I know no one who didn’t forget to convert some of his misplaced currency bills. What happened? Demonetization ended up laundering massive amounts of counterfeit currency. But thinking through the consequences of their utopian—rather puerile—policies isn’t within the competencies of the Indian bureaucrats. Worse, to patch up, they kept issuing contradictory policies that even school students should not make. This led to a constant cycle of paranoia, rumors, and confusion.
The declared objective of the exercise was to destroy black money. Of course, it did nothing of the sort. Soon more cash was in people’s hands than ever before, and kept on rising, a clear sign of a higher distrust among the people and the rising corruption.
Over the years, corruption in India has become increasingly shameless and blatant. I have never encountered a public servant who does not ask for a bribe. Who among them wants corruption to end?
So, what was the real purpose behind the demonetization of 2016?
As India gets closer to election time, cash disappears from the market, prices of expensive properties fall, and shares of certain companies get sold off. This happens because these vehicles act as a reservoir for black money and, when encashed, are used for hiring goons and bribing voters: giving out free cash, alcohol, etc. All this is done openly.
Cash sits in the vaults of political parties, ready to be given away for votes. Property transactions entail the exchange of as much as 80% in cash, which sucks up black money and regenerates it when needed at a low transaction cost—the stamp duty is based on the declared price of the properties. Stocks of certain companies rise and fall as black money is laundered for payments that must be officially reported. What are supposed to be investment vehicles often lead to a loss, seen as nothing but the cost of storing black money.
In 2016, one could conclude that the ruling BJP government, insiders to the demonetization policy, had converted their cash into what was to stay legal tender and harmed the value of the black money in the hands of the opposition.
Recently provincial elections were held in the state of Karnataka, where the BJP, which also controls the federal government, ruled. It lost the elections. That wasn’t because the hate-filled fanaticism against minorities they had ignited failed to get traction but because some votes of one opposition party, JDS, moved to another, winning party, Congress. Congress had promised to offer more freebies: regular cash payments for doing nothing and more free grains.
Hate didn’t lose, and freebies won.
As we approach the next federal elections, due within a year, physical cash has disappeared from the market, now sitting in the coffers of political parties.
Stocks of some companies dealing with money laundering and political purposes have fallen. However, this could be because of the fear of short-selling ignited by the US short-seller Hindenburg.
On 19th May 2023, India announced another demonetization, on this occasion of INR 2,000 bills. As usual, their notice is confusing and contradictory. On the one hand, it says that the INR 2,000 bill stays legal tender, but on the other, they give a deadline of 30th September 2023 to bring them to the bank. Indian federal government bureaucrats fail the rationality test school students are supposed to pass. Or, perhaps, this policy gives leeway to the ruling party, BJP, to use their INR 2,000 bills, while other parties would find themselves entrapped.
Corruption and tyranny continue to increase, and the economy continues to falter in India, quite in contrast to the bullish statements being made in the Western media. And a sane Indian voter has a choice between Tweedledee and Tweedledum. Most Indians, even when they are rich and middle class, don’t care about the larger interests of society. They act out of envy and to gain personal advantages. The chaotic, stressful mess of India is what they get and deserve.
The following are screenshots of the Reserve Bank of India press release.

It is also linked here.
 

jward

passin' thru
EndGameWW3
@EndGameWW3

Brazilian President: I dream of having a currency other than the dollar.





BRICS: Brazil President Lula Suggests a Trading Currency Other Than US Dollar​


Vignesh Karunanidhi
Vignesh Karunanidhi
May 29, 2023




The prominence of the US dollar seems to be going downhill as BRICS nations steer away from dollar dependency. Brazil and China had earlier discussed trading in their own nations’ currencies. Brazil, which is one of the prominent BRICS nations, has jointly agreed with other BRICS nations on what seems to be a well-thought-out strategy to reduce US dollar dependency.
Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has also been quite vocal in this matter. He had recently made a statement about his dream of a trading currency other than the US dollar, which was shared by TRT World Now.
JUST IN: Brazil's president Lula says he dreams of trading currency other than the US dollar.
— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) May 29, 2023

Brazil’s president dreams of a new trading currency​

Lula stated that South American countries must understand the necessity of working as a bloc to tackle poverty. Additionally, he stated that they will debate requests from several countries to join the bloc at the BRICS summit.
Talking about his dreams of trading currencies other than the US dollar, that vision doesn’t seem to be far off, as he stated in April regarding his support for the creation of a currency for trade between BRICS countries.
The BRICS nations are reportedly exploring the possibility of developing a new currency. Alexander Babakov, a Russian politician and Deputy Chairman of the State Duma, disclosed the ongoing efforts of the BRICS countries in this regard. It is not just Brazil; other nations like China, Russia, Iran, etc. are dumping the US dollar.

 

jward

passin' thru

HK dollar de-peg argument gains new currency​


William Pesek​




As China angles to increase the yuan’s role in trade and finance, economists are wondering what it means for Hong Kong’s long-time peg to the US dollar.
The will-the-peg-survive question has popped with regular popularity since the late 1990s amidst the Asian financial crisis. One such episode was in November last year when New York hedge fund manager Bill Ackman announced he was betting against the peg.

At the time, Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management cited Sino-US decoupling tensions as a rationale. That, he seemed to believe, raised the odds Hong Kong might be forced to end the peg.
And that the turmoil would make the trade profitable, unlike previous attempts by Hayman Capital’s Kyle Bass and George Soros decades before that.
Enter economist Andy Xie, who last week argued it’s time to ditch the US peg and link the Hong Kong dollar to the yuan. It’s hardly a new idea, but one Xie, a former top Morgan Stanley economist, argues has come of age in a recent South China Morning Post op-ed.
The gist of his argument is that “Hong Kong’s currency peg to the dollar is not sustainable. The city risks being increasingly led by US monetary policy as the utility of the fully convertible Hong Kong currency in meeting China’s demand for US dollars is fading. As global yuan demand grows, switching to that currency would boost Hong Kong’s financial fortunes.”

How likely is this? Not very, at least for the foreseeable future. Neither Chinese President Xi Jinping nor new Premier Li Qiang appears ready to make such a momentous change to a 40-year policy that’s served the greater China region quite well.
To be sure, the peg is now generating serious economic headwinds, warranting brainstorming in Beijing. US inflation at near 40-year highs and aggressive Federal Reserve tightening are forcing Hong Kong to tweak monetary policies in kind, undermining the business hub’s growth potential.
As Xie puts it: “With China’s interest rates expected to stay lower than US rates, due to lower Chinese inflation, embracing the yuan would stabilize Hong Kong’s asset markets. Sticking with a US-pegged currency, however, means exposure to volatility.”

Xie adds that “entrenched US inflation threatens to bring back dollar swings like in the 1970s and/or US interest rate surges like in the 1980s — the effect on Hong Kong could devastate its property market.”
Again, President Xi’s financial team hasn’t displayed much tolerance for risky policy shifts. But to economist Raymond Yeung at ANZ Bank, Xi’s ambitions for the yuan — including putting it at the center of oil purchases — are forcing the Hong Kong dollar’s peg back into the global spotlight.
“As geopolitics and economies change, so do pressures on the HK dollar peg,” Yeung says. “In recent months, more countries have expressed interest in using the yuan for transactions with China.”
What’s more, he notes, “the potential emergence of a ‘petro-yuan’ regime may seem to promote the reserve currency status of the Chinese yuan. Speculation about pegging HK dollars with the renminbi and ending the US dollar’s hegemony is also intensifying.”

China’s yuan is gaining ground as a currency of trade. Image: Twitter
That intensity can be found in surging interbank rates in Hong Kong. It reflects a drop in banking system cash amid speculation of tighter monetary conditions to come. In mid-May, the Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate rose to its highest level since December 2019.
The need for the Hong Kong Monetary Authority to keep the city’s currency in a tight range of 7.75 to 7.85 to the US dollar is complicating financial management. Over the last month, the HKMA’s aggregate balance – a key barometer of the amount of cash in the system – hit HK$44.5 billion (US$5.7 billion).
That’s the lowest since the 2008 global financial crisis. More recently, on May 30, Hong Kong’s de facto central bank loaned nearly US$500 million through its discount window.
The main cause for such liquidity squeezes is that “the Fed’s rate hike in June is on the table,” notes strategist Ken Cheung at Mizuho Bank.

Strategist Cheung Chun Him at Bank of America notes that HKMA might have to serve more and more as “lender-of-last resort” as the “scramble for funding will be particularly acute” through the end of the current quarter.
That’s becoming harder, though, as US Federal Reserve rates and those being set by the People’s Bank of China diverge.
Many economists make the argument that in order for the yuan to become a reserve currency rival to the US dollar, China’s financial system would benefit from more explicit ties to Hong Kong’s. This dynamic, though, works both ways.
“Since the city is highly integrated with China’s economy, the currency should be compatible with China’s business cycle instead of that of the US,” says ANZ Bank’s Yeung.
As peg speculation rises, Yeung thinks it’s useful to view things through the lens of Nobel laureate Robert Mundell’s 1960s theory of the “optimal currency area.” Mundell’s framework, Yeung notes, “seems to lend support because using the same currency for economies in a single market should promote economic efficiency.”

To be sure, Yeung hedges, “it’s not totally applicable to Hong Kong because the renminbi market has been extended to it. Trade, investments and financial flows can already be transacted in Chinese yuan.”
But “in our view, the yuan could eventually be a functioning currency in the stock market for transactions, including dividend payments, amid increased acceptance by global investors. Therefore, there is no need to impose unnecessary changes on the existing peg.”
Yeung speaks for many when he argues that “unnecessary change may do more harm than good.” He adds that “in short, stability is key. Although there have been rising concerns about the long-term outlook of the US dollar after the recent banking crisis, it remains a global standard.”
Looking forward, Yeung notes, China’s Belt and Road Initiative “may also attract new segments of investor interest. Countries worried about ‘weaponization’ of the US dollar could also see an alternative in the HK dollar as Hong Kong maintains free capital flows and its legal system is based on the common law.”
Still, speculators like Ackman think the Hong Kong peg’s days are numbered. The city’s precarious place is between a US that’s ratcheting rates higher and a China moving in the opposite direction. Some economists worry China is hurtling toward deflation, exacerbating Hong Kong’s troubles.

As Hong Kong struggles to straddle these two giants, it’s shackled with exactly the wrong monetary policy at a challenging moment. The straight jacket Hong Kong is forced to impose on itself could exacerbate the economic strains already damaging the government’s legitimacy, not least due to some of the worst income inequality in the developed world.
The tensions emanating from the currency peg have only grown over the last five years, in part because of Chinese money bidding up already elevated property prices. As economist Vincent Tsui at Gavekal Research points out, home prices have increased by double digits year after year.
“But if we look at the household income growth,” Tsui notes, “that has been stalled since 2018, before the social unrest, before the pandemic.”
“So basically, this dividend from the economic integration with China has been exhausted. Second, it’s the debt servicing costs, right. So there has been a period of extra low interest rate for a decade. And now actually the interbank rates are triple the level we have seen over the past decade,” says Tsui.
“So, two factors combined together on the demand side, have pretty much weakened as well. The whole supply-demand dynamic is switching in the Hong Kong housing market, making it a much shakier ground as we have seen before,” he adds.

Such risks might reduce the tolerance for fundamental changes to the mechanics of Hong Kong’s financial system. No piece is more central than the US dollar peg – or more destabilizing if a change were announced.
Ackman’s case against the Hong Kong peg has its merits, just as Bass’s did before Hayman Capital closed out its short position in 2021. This goes, too, for Soros in the late 1990s. And Xie’s take also makes some great new points.
Economist Andy Xie has raised fresh doubts about the Hong Kong dollar’s peg. Photo: Screengrab / BBC
“Riding on the yuan’s rise would be a big plus for Hong Kong,” Xie explains. “The yuan accounts for just over 2% of the global payments system, and about the same in global forex reserves. China accounts for about 18% of the world economy and around 30% of global manufacturing output.
“The yuan’s share in global payments and currency reserves is bound to rise. Before it becomes fully convertible, Hong Kong has a unique opportunity to ride its rise and consolidate its status as a global financial center,” he says.
The first step, Xie adds, could be Hong Kong “starting the transition” by shifting the government payroll to yuan and collecting taxes in yuan. “As the stock market gradually makes the shift, along with asset markets and the real economy, bank deposits and credit would follow naturally,” Xie argues. “The Hong Kong dollar would fade away.”
Yet for any of this to happen, Xi’s government would have to display a level of audacity and risk tolerance it hasn’t over the last decade, economists say. That’s why the odds still favor Hong Kong’s peg to the US dollar remaining for the foreseeable future.
Follow William Pesek on Twitter at @WilliamPesek

HK dollar de-peg argument gains new currency
 

joekan

Veteran Member
So how many countries have ditched the dollar as of today? I think I read somewhere that the big "ditching" will happen Jan.1, 2024 but I'm not sure about that.
 

jward

passin' thru
Honduras requests entry to BRICS-led development bank on China trip
Reuters
~1 minute


TEGUCIGALPA, June 9 (Reuters) - Honduras President Xiomara Castro formally requested the country's admission to the BRICS-led New Development Bank (NDB) in a meeting with the bank's president, Dilma Rousseff, Castro's office said in a tweet late Friday.

Castro is currently on a six-day official visit to China.

Headquartered in Shanghai, the New Development Bank was set up in 2015 by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, collectively known as the BRICS countries.

Reporting by Gustavo Palencia; Writing by Brendan O'Boyle; Editing by Sarah Morland
 

jward

passin' thru

The trend toward de-dollarization has become clearer as dollar weaponization damages its credibility​


Global Times​

By Lian Ping Published: Apr 28, 2023 11:59 AM




The trend toward de-dollarization has become clearer as dollar weaponization damages its credibility


The US Federal Reserve (Fed) is scheduled to announce its interest rate decision on May 3. A Reuters poll forecast the Fed would raise rates by 25 basis points in May and then keep rates on hold for the rest of the year. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard called for a much higher peak policy rate than currently expected, as inflation remains stubbornly high, according to Reuters.

In order to tame the worst inflation in four decades caused by US' monetary easing since the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed radically raised interest rates at a rare pace and intensity in 2022, which accelerated the flow of international capital to the US, causing exchange rates plummet, financial market turmoil, and debt defaults in some countries.
Analysis now generally believes that this round of interest rate hikes by the Fed is approaching an end, and the momentum of international capital flows to the US is expected to slow down. But, as interest rates in the US remain at a high level, economies across the world, especially developing countries facing domestic economic problems, should not take lightly the spillover impact from the US monetary policy.
For a long time, driven by the "America First" approach, the Fed has used the status of the US dollar as an international key currency to ease the economic problems in the US at the expense of the interests of other countries, which has seriously impacted the world's financial and economic stability. What is even more worrying is that the US has intensified its efforts to turn the hegemony of the dollar into a geopolitical weapon, frequently resorting to sanctions and other reckless measures. In this context, many countries have begun to explore de-dollarization and seek to get rid of the hegemony of the dollar.

At present, an increasing number of countries are considering or have changed the US dollar payment settlement to bilateral local currency payments. According to incomplete statistics, a total of 85 countries have joined the de-dollarization process in various ways. In the future, the trend of de-dollarization is expected to become even clearer. The main reasons are as follows:

For starters, the world's economic and political landscape is undergoing major changes, which is one of the important causes of the trend of de-dollarization. The global political and economic rules constructed by the US are becoming increasingly unable to meet the needs of world economic development. Global rules dominated by the US have changed from promoting the development of the world economy to maintaining the US' hegemony, and have caused global concerns about the hegemony of the dollar.

Secondly, the development trend of the world economy "rising of the East and the declining of the West" has made the proportion of the US economy in global economy to drop. Economic strength is the basis for the international status of a currency. As the global share of the US economy declines and de-dollarization continues to develop, the share of the US dollar in global payment settlements and official foreign exchange reserves will inevitably continue to decline.

Third, the weaponization of the dollar has made the dollar face a growing credibility crisis. Since 2022, the US has led a series of economic sanctions against Russia. Russia is an important resource exporter in the world. The "plundering" sanctions against Russia have made countries that have economic and trade relations with Russia worry that they may be implicated. Meanwhile, this has also exacerbated the dissatisfaction of global economic entities with the hegemony of the US dollar, and their distrust and concerns about the US dollar have continued to increase. As a result, countries have tried to bypass the US dollar and establish bilateral local currency settlement or regional currency settlement systems.
In a very short period of time, many countries have collectively launched the de-dollarization action, which is likely to become the beginning of the accelerated process of de-dollarization. However, changing dollar dominance is a complex issue. In the short term, the US dollar will still dominate the international monetary system, which is determined by the inertia of international transactions formed by the global US dollar transaction stock. With the drastic changes in the world's economic and political situation in the coming period, the weakening of the US dollar's dominance may accelerate in stages. Overall, the change in the dominance of the US dollar will not happen overnight, and de-dollarization will be a long-term evolutionary process.

Yuan internationalization is not direct substitute of de-dollarization, but the evolution of de-dollarization is a development opportunity for yuan internationalization. Out of fear of the hegemony of the US dollar and doubts about the credibility of the US dollar, countries will gradually promote the process of de-dollarization, thereby changing the situation in which the US dollar dominates the international monetary system and moving toward a diversified international monetary system. In this process, the demand for dollars in various countries will gradually shift to other currencies. This will bring more demand for the international use of yuan with a solid economic transaction foundation and good credit, thereby enhancing the yuan internationalization.
De-dollarization has opened up new space for the internationalization of the yuan. China should take advantage of the trend, seize the opportunity, take the initiative, and promote the internationalization of the yuan in an orderly manner. China's constant efforts on boosting economic growth can provide good fundamental support for yuan internationalization. By promoting high-level opening-up and cooperation, more application scenarios can be provided for yuan internationalization.

Moreover, continuing to implement a prudent monetary policy will help China maintain the stability of the yuan exchange rate. Actively promoting the formation and development of domestic and overseas offshore yuan markets can be an important condition and basis for the development of yuan internationalization.
The author is chief economist and head of the Zhixin Investment Research Institute. bizopinion@globaltimes.com.cn
So how many countries have ditched the dollar as of today? I think I read somewhere that the big "ditching" will happen Jan.1, 2024 but I'm not sure about that.
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
So how many countries have ditched the dollar as of today? I think I read somewhere that the big "ditching" will happen Jan.1, 2024 but I'm not sure about that.


I don't know that many have 'ditched' it completely, but what has been done is to authorize other channels for inter-nation trade.

This will continue, and likely gain momentum.

When can they completely ditch the dollar? When there's nothing left they need to/want to purchase from the US.
 
Top