GOV/MIL House GOP to Obama: Why does the delay in healthcare mandate not extend to individuals?

Magdalen

Veteran Member
From Bridget Johnson at the PJ Tatler

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/07/0...amacare-creates-many-new-questions-to-answer/

Fair Use...

House Republican leaders today pressed President Obama on his delay of the ObamaCare employer mandate, asking why the same relief from the new regulations wasn’t extended to households as well.

The yearlong implementation delay of the employer provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) relieved businesses of noncompliance penalties for an extra year as an adjustment period.


“We agree with you that many of the provisions in the law cannot be implemented within the current time frame; but we strongly disagree with you that time will ever remedy these predictable consequences of the law,” said a letter sent to Obama today by House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and other GOP leaders. “Many have predicted the problems that your Administration now acknowledges, and each provision you delay continues to demonstrate that the entire law is unworkable.”

“We recognize that the decision to delay the employer mandate was likely not a decision you made in only a day and necessarily required substantial review by analysts at the Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor, as well as the Office of Management and Budget.”

Treasury announced the delay last week. “The Administration is announcing that it will provide an additional year before the ACA mandatory employer and insurer reporting requirements begin,” said Mark J. Mazur, assistant secretary for tax policy. “…Just like the Administration’s effort to turn the initial 21-page application for health insurance into a three-page application, we are working hard to adapt and to be flexible about reporting requirements as we implement the law.”

“Your decision to delay one part of the law affecting employers and leave in place provisions regulating individual and family health care creates many new questions and concerns,” House Republicans continued in their letter.

They asked that the administration provide to Congress:

the change in the number of individuals receiving subsidies through the exchange for calendar year 2014,
the change in the number of individuals expected to pay the individual mandate penalty for calendar year 2014,
the change in the number of employers who currently provide health care coverage,
changes in federal outlays and revenues,
changes in enrollment in Medicaid for calendar year 2014,
the impact of the employer mandate on increasing the number of individuals working part-time involuntarily and business reducing the number of hours employees work to below 30 hours,
the impact on the ability of the IRS and Health care Exchanges to accurately verify and prevent fraud regarding individual eligibility for premium tax credits and cost sharing subsidies,
the legality of the decision to unilaterally delay the mandate, and
the economic impact.
“Please also provide to Congress your justification for only delaying the employer mandate at this time and not the new mandate on individuals and families,” they added. “We agree with you that the burden was overwhelming for employers, but we also believe American families need the same relief.”

House Republicans also want a list of any other ObamaCare provisions expected to be delayed before Oct. 1.

“Because the unilateral changes to this complicated law were surely made with a great deal of data, review and input, we believe it is reasonable to request answers to these questions by August 1, 2013.”



That last line is most delicious. It doesn't mean he'll answer, but it's delicious anyway.

magdalen
 

Hognutz

Has No Life - Lives on TB
It is funny how Obama can choose what laws to implement........Almost like he was a King or something.
 

Grammytomany

Inactive
QUOTE=Hognutz;4895162]It is funny how Obama can choose what laws to implement........Almost like he was a King or something.[/QUOTE]

Really??? What makes you think that???? :shkr:
 

Hognutz

Has No Life - Lives on TB
QUOTE=Hognutz;4895162]It is funny how Obama can choose what laws to implement........Almost like he was a King or something.

Really??? What makes you think that???? :shkr:[/QUOTE]

The law says it is to be implemented on Jan 1st 2014, but for some they have been given an extenshion......So he has effectively ignored what the law says......
 

Grammytomany

Inactive
Really??? What makes you think that???? :shkr:

The law says it is to be implemented on Jan 1st 2014, but for some they have been given an extenshion......So he has effectively ignored what the law says......[/QUOTE]
'
I know...I was just joking with you and all. He does think he is a king tho'. and we are the serfs. They need to give all of us a break and just get rid of this thing once and for all. It cannot work with any type of fairness or safety for the patients. JMHO
 

Hognutz

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The law says it is to be implemented on Jan 1st 2014, but for some they have been given an extenshion......So he has effectively ignored what the law says......
'
I know...I was just joking with you and all. He does think he is a king tho'. and we are the serfs. They need to give all of us a break and just get rid of this thing once and for all. It cannot work with any type of fairness or safety for the patients. JMHO[/QUOTE]

Yes Ma'am, In agreement with ya.......
 

BL225128

Inactive
its obvious the whole act was not thought out at all taking into account all exceptions etc

You assume that this is incompetance, rather than malfeasance. I suspect in this case it is the latter.

Obunghole does not want businesses contributing heavily to the opposition in the next Congressional Election, nor does he really desire to tank the economy now in one fell swoop, rather bleed it dry and hollow it out piece by piece through the next election and then maybe drop the hammer if he has control of the Congress. Average business man does not think much beyond the next quarter (and some even less than that), so any delay will be treated the same as if it were repealed as businesses will have no particular drive to assist in electing those who'd actually repeal OdungaCare.

Bathhouse Boy also assumes that a significant drop in business contributions will not be matched by other conservative groups and individuals, especially if the same criminal tricks are played by the IRS, FBI, Just'Us, etc.
 

Argonath

Senior Member
The primary reason individuals weren't given a year delay is because Obama wants the tax money to keep flowing, and its all gravy since no services are actually being provided.
 

WildDaisy

God has a plan, Trust it!
its obvious the whole act was not thought out at all taking into account all exceptions etc

How can something be thought out if it wasn't even read before they voted on it. None of those idiots can even balance their checkbooks, let alone understand insurance and its ramifications in the business world as well as for citizens.

But most of the Congress Critters don't care because they exempted themselves from the law, knowing full well when they voted on it before reading it that it likely contained provisions they did not want for themselves and their families.
 
Top