TDS Georgia Prosecutor Is Offering Plea Deals To Trump Co-Defendants To Bag The ‘Real Target,’ Experts Say

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________
Georgia Prosecutor Is Offering Plea Deals To Trump Co-Defendants To Bag The ‘Real Target,’ Experts Say

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis avoided the strategic disadvantage of having to preview her case against former President Donald Trump when two co-defendants accepted last-minute plea deals ahead of their scheduled trial this week, legal experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Attorneys Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro, the two co-defendants in Trump’s Georgia 2020 election case who requested speedy trials that were scheduled to start Monday, accepted plea deals on Thursday and Friday, respectively, halting a trial that would have allowed Trump’s defense team to see some of Willis’ evidence ahead of time. For Willis, who pushed hard to get all defendants tried on the same date, plea deals mean she won’t be forced to provide a “free look” next week at how she intends to try the case, legal experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“She really wanted this upcoming trial in October to not happen because she did not want to reveal her playbook, so to speak, to the primary defendants: Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani and the others,” Georgia-based criminal defense attorney and legal analyst Philip Holloway told the DCNF.

“If there had been a trial of Kenneth Chesebro, it would have been the first time any prosecutor in the multiple cases against Trump has had to prove their case, rather than making allegations in an indictment,” Cornell Law School professor William A. Jacobson told the DCNF. “Such a trial would have signaled to the public how strong the evidence was against Trump, and also would have given the Trump defense a chance to preview the prosecution’s case against him.”

Now, Willis won’t be forced to lay her cards on the table quite so soon.

While the prosecution’s willingness to accept plea deals may reflect they have been “overcharging defendants,” Jacobson said they are keeping their eyes on the “real target” — the former president.

Along with allowing Willis to keep evidence under wraps, plea deals have also enabled prosecutors to secure witnesses who could be beneficial to the case, particularly with Sidney Powell. Part of the conditions for each of the three deals include testifying honestly at other co-defendants trials.

“There’s no question that she was in meetings and several of them with other people who have been charged,” John Malcolm, vice president for the Heritage Foundation’s Institute for Constitutional Government and former deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s Criminal Division, told the DCNF. “She is going to be able to testify about what happened at some of those meetings.”

Malcolm said that Powell and Scott Hall, a bail bond owner who was the first to take a plea deal, got “very, very favorable agreements,” pleading only to misdemeanors. After probation is over, both of their misdemeanors will be “wiped off of the books,” Malcolm said.

Chesebro, meanwhile, pleaded guilty to a felony. Holloway said it’s likely a decision “he made based on practicality.”

“In the event of a conviction, he could easily have spent the rest of his life in prison,” Holloway told the DCNF, noting other defense teams are “watching this very carefully.”

“Some of them are disappointed that these individuals have entered the plea because I think a lot of the defense lawyers believe that these charges can be beat,” he said, adding that Willis has been “very busy” contacting other co-defendant’s defense teams to offer plea deals over the past few weeks.

“Many of these defendants are people who don’t have a lot of resources,” Holloway said. “They might otherwise prefer to have their day in court, but they just can’t afford to keep paying lawyers for this type of very complicated and very expensive litigation.”

Willis did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
 

Uhhmmm...

Veteran Member
Prosecutors are supposed to be concerned about the truth...

In any crime involving more than one person, there are participants, and there are ringleaders. Also, some ringleaders are more more influencial than others.

Obviously, prosecution of higher level ringleaders is more pressing than prosecution of lower level ringleaders or mere participants.

Get over it.
 
Last edited:

Bps1691

Veteran Member
In any crime involving more than one person, there are participants, and there are ringleaders. Also, some ringleaders are more more influencial than others.

Obviously, prosecution of higher level ringleaders is more pressing than prosecution of lower level ringleaders or mere participants.

Get over it.
Get over what?

That the judiciary system has been warped into politically driven and a three teir unjustice tool of the state?

Sorry but this is much bigger than the orange haired one. He’s an idiot who doesn’t know when to shut his mouth and turn off his ego. My concern is the misuse of the judicial system period!

I hated seeing the republic die and the corruption of the justice system by leftist is one of the biggest breaches that opened the doors to allowing them to kill this country.

Sorry but I’ll never get over the death of the country where I grew up.
 

john70

Veteran Member
“Many of these defendants are people who don’t have a lot of resources,” Holloway said. “They might otherwise prefer to have their day in court, but they just can’t afford to keep paying lawyers for this type of very complicated and very expensive litigation.”

this IS how almost ALL Persecutors work....


IT WORKED FOR ME 25 years ago

YOU WILL bend or break

i had no money....................i bent
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
Show me the man and I'll show you the crime.

Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent.

Read more at: Show me the man and I'll show you the crime - The Oxford Eagle

Dobbin
YUP!
This a Marxist-based movement hounding their opposition just like the foundational era of Soviet Russia's Communism.
ETA
It's well-settled that Victors write the history.

It follows they also use any means to protect their strangle hold on power and when fettered by a document like The Constitution, work very hard on getting another of their ilk in power.

Were it not for The Constitution and 2A, America could have evolved into a hereditary dictator ship along the pathway NK followed.
My impression of the current DNC-Social Justice Crew is they'll seize any opportunity to over turn 2A then follow on by modifying The Constitution and SCOTUS so they can create a system where their horde of illegals will magically become bought-and-paid for voters.


N Khrushchev boasted Communism would take over America with hardly a shot fired.

Better keep your eyes open so you don't miss the point on the Timeline.

Every Warren, Sanders or any other Progressive Socialist they can elect or appoint into the Bureaucracy of Govt. at any level is another step closer.
 
Last edited:

oops

Veteran Member
Wellllll...Trump exposed more deep state...can’t fault his play book...it’s workin spectacularly...even when I could pull my hair out in frustration with it...anyone that can’t see how politicized the judicial system/gov is...is willfully being blind to it...
 

Uhhmmm...

Veteran Member
Your assumption is that a crime took place.
As to whether there has been a crime committed... Time will tell.

There are perhaps 30 prosecution witnesses. All of them are life-long Republicans. Trump himself vetted and hired many of them. So, no Rino's in the bunch. All…of…them...will…testify...against...Trump.

The witnesses, e-mails, text messages, and recordings - all incontestable facts - will paint a devastating picture.

Few folks will testify for Trump. Several who might otherwise support him are named as (presently) unindicted co-conspirators!

No, Trump has more than met his match. He committed a crime. He will likely serve some jail time. The vast majority of Americans will support jail time if they see the trial live and in front of them along with all the evidence. TV will doom Trump this time around.
 
Last edited:

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
As to whether there has been a crime committed... Time will tell.

There are perhaps 30 prosecution witnesses. All of them are life-long Republicans. Trump himself vetted and hired many of them. So, no Rino's in the bunch. All…of…them...will…testify...against...Trump.

The witnesses, e-mails, text messages, and recordings - all incontestable facts - will paint a devastating picture.

Few folks will testify for Trump. Several who might otherwise support him are named as (presently) unindicted co-conspirators!

No, Trump has more than met his match. He committed a crime. He will likely serve some jail time. The vast majority of Americans will support jail time if they see the trial live and in front of them. TV will doom Trump this time around.
No RINOS in the bunch???!?

talk about assssssssssssssssssumptions.


By the way, Eric Ericson in Atlanta has said that this is definitely what is happening--pick off, one by one, the others (due to their not having the means to prove their innocence --when it's SUPPOSED to be the other way around, the Persecutor--who by the way ISN'T EVEN FROM GA--she was shipped in here from CALI to handle this) and then the very fact that they "Confessed" to a "crime" will be used by the prosecutor to "PROVE" that it WAS a "crime."

He further said the only way Trump can get out of this now is to say he "acted on the advice of my attorneys"--which puts the monkey back on his/her/their backs as Erickson (who is a lawyer) is claiming that he can't be prosecuted for acting on legal advice on matters in which he trusted the professional advice of legal professionals.
 

Uhhmmm...

Veteran Member
...By the way, Eric Ericson in Atlanta has said... said the only way Trump can get out of this now is to say he "acted on the advice of my attorneys"--which puts the monkey back on his/her/their backs as Erickson (who is a lawyer) is claiming that he can't be prosecuted for acting on legal advice on matters in which he trusted the professional advice of legal professionals.

Not really...

The Chesebro and Powell Guilty Pleas Torch Trump’s Planned Defense​

On Friday, Kenneth Chesebro pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to file false documents in the Fulton County 2020 election conspiracy case… With the guilty plea and cooperation deal Georgia prosecutors struck on Thursday with Team Trump attorney Sidney Powell, Chesebro’s plea deal should be viewed as an earthquake in the case against Trump. Given Powell’s close proximity to the former president and his legal advisers at crucial times in his attempts to overturn the 2020 election, her testimony will be particularly devastating not only as to defendant Trump, but to co-defendants Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman.

Chesebro’s testimony, meanwhile, implicates one of the key portions of the conspiracy both in Georgia and in the federal Jan. 6 case against Trump, specifically the efforts to create a slate of “false electors” to use during the Jan. 6 electoral count to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Now that both Chesebro and Powell are cooperating witnesses, the pressure on Giuliani and Eastman to plead and cooperate is exponentially higher.

That the significant cooperation under discussion involves four of Trump’s attorneys underscores the reality that the former president’s regularly touted defense that he was relying on the good-faith guidance of his attorneys during the attempted coup was, and is, nothing more than self-serving fantasy. In the courtroom—as compared with on television or in social media—he has never had the ability to offer that defense.

In court, the advice of counsel “affirmative defense” requires a defendant to prove two things: First, that he relied in good faith on his lawyer’s advice that the conduct in question at trial was legal, and second, that he made a full disclosure of all relevant facts to the attorney before receiving that advice…

Putting aside the substantial evidence that Trump was warned by numerous White House lawyers that his efforts to overturn the 2020 election were in violation of the law, how does Trump establish the advice of counsel defense at trial?

As I have observed in prior articles, he is certainly not able to testify on his own behalf. There are surely no memos to the file, emails, or letters to the client evidencing such advice in writing. Finally in this regard, what lawyer is willing to testify he or she advised Trump it was, for example, lawful for him to ask the Georgia secretary of state to “find” enough votes for him to win that state?

Long before the Powell and Chesebro deals were announced, the absurdity of expecting any Trump attorney’s testimony to be anything but harmful to his cause was made crystal clear by Michael Cohen. More recently, when Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran was forced to testify against the former president based on the “crime fraud” exception to the attorney-client privilege, the testimony he gave and the internal memos he was compelled to produce, proved not to be shields for the former president, but swords to be wielded against him—as it is with Powell and Chesebro, and so it will be with others…whatever your weak ego and malicious intentions require.

More at this -> LINK
 
Last edited:

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
I really do not share your exultation in a legal system where being "accused" of a crime means you are GUILTY of a crime,

nor one where having witnesses BLACKMAILED to testify against you MUST mean, ipso facto, that YOU are guilty, too.....
 

2dollarbill

Veteran Member
As to whether there has been a crime committed... Time will tell.

There are perhaps 30 prosecution witnesses. All of them are life-long Republicans. Trump himself vetted and hired many of them. So, no Rino's in the bunch. All…of…them...will…testify...against...Trump.

The witnesses, e-mails, text messages, and recordings - all incontestable facts - will paint a devastating picture.

Few folks will testify for Trump. Several who might otherwise support him are named as (presently) unindicted co-conspirators!

No, Trump has more than met his match. He committed a crime. He will likely serve some jail time. The vast majority of Americans will support jail time if they see the trial live and in front of them along with all the evidence. TV will doom Trump this time around.
I doubt it. He will appeal to the SC and probably win as he was Prez at the time and insulated from this so called crime. Watch and see.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The link goes to Slate.com.

That should tell you all you need to ignore.

It (the case) is all in the "perception."

Like Derek Chauvin having "murdered" George Floyd - because he happened to be pinning Floyd to the ground when he expired of other causes - as verified by the medical examiner. The jury "chose" not to perceive.

Like Doug Mackey being perceived having spread "misinformation" and supposedly "subverting the election process" in posting a Vote For Hillary meme? When NOBODY complained of having been fooled. And memes are understood from their source (Internet) generally to be "overstated?" Babylon Bee had better watch out. If they can fool this horse who else more perceptive are they fooling?

Like John Eastman being disbarred for pointing out the "obvious" election malfeasance? Apparently his perception is finer than those who judge him. A convenient for the Left selective perception.

Like Hillary destroying Classified Documents - which the "connected" FBI perceived as "ok?"

Like Trump who followed procedure in storage of classified documents at Mar-A-Largo, and was perceived as breaking the law, while Biden VIOLATED procedure in storage of classified documents at no less than five locations - and gets a pass? And has yet to even be investigated?

Like state alternate electors being indicted for perceived election rigging? When all they were doing was following state law and preparing for the "next step" should a state contest to the Election 2020 Outcome be called and the results "turn?"

Like the innumerable Trump originated election malfeasance lawsuits to innumerable state and federal courts which have all been turned by Leftist Judges on the basis of "No Standing?" And if one of the contestants in an election don't have legal standing - who the H*eck does?

And similar State Election Commission election malfeasance lawsuits to innumerable state and federal courts which have all been turned by Leftist Judges on a similar basis of "No Standing?" And if the State managers of an election don't have legal standing - who the H*eck does?

It makes one wonder why ANYONE would prepare a legal affidavit claiming election malfeasance - it is sure to be rejected. And one's mind goes to John Harington's commentary on Treason.

Re-written:

Fraud doth never prosper, what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it Fraud.

So nobody does or will. And if they try, they end up like Tina Peters or others.

Sorry Uhhmmm. I perceive a posting bias which exceeds credibility. I don't imagine I am alone.

Dobbin
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
Sorry Uhhmmm. I perceive a posting bias which exceeds credibility. I don't imagine I am alone.
Uhhmmm reminds me of a liberal college English professor who engaged me in many friendly disagreements.

She was dating my boss and we got together socially at least once a month.

Always articulate with a partial truth. Confident in their infallible liberal tunnel vision.
 

kemosabe

Doooooooooom !
This is what they do .. .... charge a bunch of people .. pretty much try and bankrupt them into taking a plea deal to "flip" on someone...
Low hanging fruit and all......
 

ssonb

Senior Member
When you are in DJTs position in these "legal" situations you feed the vanity of the opposing side.
 

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
nor one where having witnesses BLACKMAILED to testify against you MUST mean, ipso facto, that YOU are guilty, too.....
Pretty much SOP in almost every "Free World Justice System". Redundant often related charges stemming from a single or series of events are often filed in hopes of getting the accused to plead out on one of the lesser ones.

The bigger the fish, the more charges.

If the accused marches to his/her own drummer and counter to the goals of those currently in power, all the stops are pulled out.

DJT resonates to some degree with a lot of people but he is a stone in the shoe of another group who's end game is changing this country forever into yet another Marxist member of an Open Border hegemony.
 
Top