CRIME Fraud Charged in $1 Billion Hazmat/Rad Clean Up of Former Hunter's Point Naval Shipyard (SF Bay Area)

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Brought up on Savage's Show today...

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://sfbayview.com/2018/04/the-st...h-tetra-tech-at-hunters-point-naval-shipyard/

The strange silence of Rep. Pelosi and Sen. Feinstein over the $1 billion US fraud scandal with Tetra Tech at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard

April 12, 2018
by Steve Zeltzer, KPFA WorkWeek Radio

Over $1 billion has been spent by the federal government since 2004 to clean up and remediate one of the most highly toxic and radioactive sites in the U.S., the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in San Francisco. This Superfund site was home for decades, 1946-1969, to the Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory, and large Navy warships were towed there from the Pacific, where they had been placed close to nuclear tests.

A large part of the remediation was done by Tetra Tech, one of the largest remediation companies in the world, with $2.6 billion in revenue in 2016. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been paid to Tetra Tech for testing and moving the highly contaminated soil.

As the project developed, many community activists and environmentalists charged that the project was not being done properly. Dr. Ahimsa Porter Sumchai and Dr. Ray Tomkins, speaking on behalf of the Bayview Hunters Point community, have spent decades investigating the development and demanding that proper testing take place at the site.

One of the first critical questions about the testing on the site came from Test America Quality Assurance Manager Michael Madry. He noticed that the tests by the company on asbestos were coming back 100 percent negative.

This was statistically impossible, and he and another manager learned that the company had reduced the testing from 15 minutes to 50 seconds by using a game pad. When he raised the issue with the company, he was bullied, harassed and illegally fired.

As the project developed, many community activists and environmentalists charged that the project was not being done properly.

He went to the federal Whistleblower Protection Program (WPP), where federal investigator and lawyer Darrell Whitman investigated and determined that there should be a merit determination, that he indeed had been terminated for making health and safety complaints.

Madry, who was conducting tests on both Hunters Point Naval Shipyard and Treasure Island, provided reports of the falsified testing to Congresswomen Pelosi and Sen. Diane Feinstein as well to the Environmental Protection Agency. Neither politician contacted him about the serious falsification of work.

After federal OSHA investigator Darrell Whitman completed his report, he was told to rewrite it by his boss, Josh Paul, who is also a lawyer. Falsifying such a report is a felony under the law.

What happened to federal OSHA official Whitman is that he became the target of workplace bullying for this report and another OSHA investigation he was conducting. He was later terminated along with all the other lawyers at the Region 9 Whistleblower Protection Program.

Madry, who was conducting tests on both Hunters Point Naval Shipyard and Treasure Island, provided reports of the falsified testing to Congresswomen Pelosi and Sen. Diane Feinstein as well to the Environmental Protection Agency. Neither politician contacted him about the serious falsification of work.

When Whitman provided the documents to Sen. Feinstein, she responded that she had received them and wanted to talk to him, but she never came through.

The largest group of whistleblowers to come forward about the falsification of testing at the Hunters Point Shipyard and Treasure Island were health and safety inspectors at Tetra Tech. They reported that the company was actually doing improper testing and illegal removal of material without proper documentation. They were bullied, harassed and terminated by Tetra Tech.

This led to a number of reports by NBC Bay Area Investigates and even the San Francisco Chronicle after the workers, with their lawyer, Dave Anton, held a press conference. District Attorney George Gascón’s office even called and attorney Anton met with him once, but he never called back.

The largest group of whistleblowers to come forward about the falsification of testing at the Hunters Point Shipyard and Treasure Island were health and safety inspectors at Tetra Tech.

In the midst of this growing controversy, the U.S. Navy hired consultants to investigate the testing results by Tetra Tech. In a report by Kathryn A. Higley of Radioecology Research, the consultants said there was massive fraud by Tetra Tech in the testing at the Hunter Point Naval Shipyard.
The report said:
  • When “sufficiently low levels of contamination were not obtained,” Tetra Tech would fetch samples from a “different area known to have lower radioactivity, and reported as having come from the location being investigated”;
  • When Tetra Tech found samples or data dirtier or more radioactive than EPA-mandated levels of safety, they were discarded;
  • Instead of sampling areas with known radioactivity, they would collect samples from nearby areas and pass those off as coming from the radioactive location;
  • When low levels of contamination were not “obtained,” they would simply “move 5 to 10 feet in another direction” to collect clean dirt;
  • Machines used to screen material were run at a speed too fast to detect radiation;
  • And soil known to be dirty was blocked from being sent to the offsite lab for testing.

The question today is why, after this wide publicity about the falsification of testing by Tetra Tech and the retaliation against numerous health and safety whistleblowers, there has been complete and total silence by Congresswoman Pelosi and Sen. Feinstein?
Does this mean that they are in fact part of the cover-up and fraud on the U.S. government because they have personal financial connections to this development?
Congresswomen Pelosi’s nephew Laurence Pelosi, who is also a cousin of then-Mayor Gavin Newsom, was director of acquisitions from January 2002 through March of 2005 for Florida-based Lennar, the City’s master developer for both naval bases, the Hunters Point Shipyard and Treasure Island.
The question today is why, after this wide publicity about the falsification of testing by Tetra Tech and the retaliation against numerous health and safety whistleblowers, there has been complete and total silence by Congresswoman Pelosi and Sen. Feinstein?

In November of 2008, Lennar was facing imminent bankruptcy after spending over $5 million – or $50 per vote – to pass Proposition G, a measure designed to gain support of the San Francisco electorate for Lennar’s proposed Hunters Point Shipyard-Candlestick Park Conceptual Plan and its transfers of state and federal lands. Lennar’s LEN stocks sank to $3.60 per share despite restructuring and partnership with CB Richard Ellis, headed by Richard Blum, husband of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, owner of Perini Construction and principle sponsor of the Lennar-funded Proposition G campaign to develop the site.

On March 20, 2018, at Treasure Island, a meeting was convened by the U.S. Navy and run by the same Tetra Tech to report on the “cleanup” of the island. Again, the question has to be asked why, after all this massive fraud and illegal retaliation against whistleblowers, is this same company, Tetra Tech, still in charge of this remediation. Maybe Sen. Feinstein and Congresswomen Pelosi have some answer to these questions.

Steve Zeltzer and the Labor Video Project can be reached at lvpsf@igc.org.
They were then sandblasted at the shipyard under a plan to “decontaminate” these ships. Under immense political pressure, including reported coercion from Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Congresswomen Nancy Pelosi, the U.S. Navy agreed to turn over the site to the City and its master developer Lennar for development in 2004, and both powerful San Francisco politicians used their political muscle to allocate eventually hundreds of millions of dollars of federal funds for the cleanup of radiation and toxic chemicals.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.sfexaminer.com/epa-revie...t-shipyard-finds-falsified-soil-testing-data/

EPA review of contaminated Hunters Point Shipyard finds more falsified soil testing data


A sign warns of toxic landfill near The San Francisco Shipyard housing project. (Dan Chambers/Special to S.F. Examiner)
By Laura Waxmann on April 9, 2018 6:18 pm

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found that almost all soil samples taken from two contaminated parcels of the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard that are slated for redevelopment into housing are in need of retesting.

The EPA’s December review of the data was released Tuesday by the environmental advocacy group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), which obtained the documents under the Freedom of Information Act.

In its report, the EPA raised concerns about “potential falsification, data manipulation, and/or data quality concerns” in some 97 percent of samples taken from a portion of the shipyard known as Parcel G, which is slated for housing. It also recommended retesting of 90 percent of soil samples taken from another site called Parcel B.

The agency’s review disputes initial estimates given by the U.S. Navy in September, which recommended the resampling of 49 percent of samples taken from Parcel G and 15 percent of samples taken from “trenches, fill and building sites” in Parcel B. Parcels B and G cover nearly 40 percent of the area slated for development.

Earlier this year, the Navy announced it plans to retest samples taken by contracting firm Tetra Tech, a Pasadena-based company that was tasked with the shipyard’s clean up.

The shipyard was the site of a radiological defense laboratory and used as grounds for dumping of radioactive materials for more than two decades. Its former use as a dock for contaminated Navy ships left portions of the shipyard heavily polluted. Declared an EPA Superfund Site in 1989, the 450-acre shipyard has been subject to cleanup for nearly three decades.

The shipyard’s planned transformation into 12,000 housing units, as well as commercial and office space, is underway, and land already deemed safe for development has been transferred to developer FivePoint in stages. That land transfer process was halted in 2016, when allegations of fraud by Tetra Tech surfaced in 2016, but doubts about the contractor’s work date back to 2010.

According to the EPA memo, nearly a third of samples taken from trench units in Parcel G, which was slated for transfer at the end of this year pending safety clearance by the Navy, “showed a need for further biased soil samples to be collected, but they were not.”

Out of samples taken from 43 trench units that were not recommended for retesting by the Navy, the EPA found inconsistencies in over half and raised additional concerns in nearly one-third of the samples.

In Parcel B, the EPA’s review suggests additional inconsistency in the samples in many of the recorded samples: “In some samples, the weights recorded for the onsite lab differed significantly from the recorded for what should be the same sample sent to the offsite lab.”

The EPA’s review was released by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), an environmental advocacy group that obtained the documents under the Freedom of Information Act.

Jeff Ruch, executive director of PEER, said in a statement that the EPA review further shows that “Hunters Point is unfolding into the biggest case of eco-fraud in U.S. History.”

“What makes these findings so remarkable is that the Navy was on notice for years that it had a major data meltdown on its hands yet is still trying to cook the books,” said Ruch.

EPA spokesperson Michele Huitric told the San Francisco Examiner that the EPA’s assessment of the data was broader than the Navy’s review and “included looking more closely for signs of potential data quality problems in addition to signs of potential falsification.”

“For example, EPA recommended resampling when data were missing or when different data collection methods did not produce consistent results,” said Huitric, adding that the EPA’s input will help inform where the resampling will be conducted.
“The EPA is pleased that the Navy will be resampling the impacted parcels and relying on these new data to determine where additional cleanup may be needed,” she said.

Click here or scroll down to comment
 

Jeep

Veteran Member
Kickbacks to Swinestein and piglosi????????? I look for this to be a non-news event and get buried real quick to protect the two hags.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Kickbacks to Swinestein and piglosi????????? I look for this to be a non-news event and get buried real quick to protect the two hags.

When you consider housing prices in SF and the involvement Feinstein has had in the disposition of "surplus" government property, never mind moving the USN out of the SF Bay Area all sorts of "things" start to become possible...
 

cjoi

Veteran Member
Kickbacks to Swinestein and piglosi????????? I look for this to be a non-news event and get buried real quick to protect the two hags.

When you consider housing prices in SF and the involvement Feinstein has had in the disposition of "surplus" government property, never mind moving the USN out of the SF Bay Area all sorts of "things" start to become possible...



All a matter of proportion; a few murders, rob a few thousand, get big outrage reaction. Crimes on the scale they commit and no one bats an eye lash.
 
Top