Filmmaker Oliver Stone would vote for Ron Paul over Obama! Wow, Repubs take note!

mt4design

Has No Life - Lives on TB
if Oliver Stone is bothered by Obama and his spending spree, then how scared should the left be? I hope the Republicans take note of just what could drive potential voters to their side. STOP SPENDING!!!

----------------------------

Filmmaker Oliver Stone would vote for Ron Paul over Obama
By Jonathan Easley - 01/24/12 09:52 AM ET

Filmmaker Oliver Stone, known for his liberal political views, said he would vote for GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul over President Obama should Paul win the Republican nomination.

In an interview with Rock Cellar magazine, Stone was asked if an economic collapse would lead to the fall of the American “empire.”

“I think it’s a given,” Stone said. “There’s no way that we can continue this spending spree. In fact, I think in many ways the most interesting candidate — I’d even vote for him if he was running against Obama — is Ron Paul. Because he’s the only one of anybody who’s saying anything intelligent about the future of the world.”

Stone was a vocal supporter of the president in 2008, and wrote an editorial in the Guardian saying that Obama could be the “heir to John F. Kennedy.”

According to Federal Election Commission records, in 2008 Stone donated $2,300 directly to the Obama campaign and another $2,300 to the Obama Victory Fund, which raises money for Obama’s re-election as well as for the Democratic National Committee.

Stone also has a long and controversial history of political filmmaking and political stances.

He’s directed movies about Presidents George W. Bush, Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy, as well as films about 9/11 and Vietnam War veteran and activist Ron Kovic.

Stone is also known for embracing some of far-left’s most notorious figures, such as Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

This story was updated at 11:15 am.
 

Aardaerimus

Anunnaku
True conservatives and disenchanted Obamatrons see Ron Paul as the only option, but mainstream Republicans will do everything in their power to make certain that the disenchanted left will not cross the line and will ensure a victory for Obama.

If they magically see the light and the RINOs fall away, I don't see anything stopping Ron Paul from crushing Obama.
 

eaglefeather

Inactive
By the end of summer
the vast majority of Americans will see that Ron Paul is the only way out of this mess
that both parties have created.
 

Oilpatch Hand

3-Bomb General, TB2K Army
I'm afraid that Mr. Stone's endorsement, as insincere as that is since it contemplates a prospective choice that he will never need to make, says more about Ron Paul than it does about Mr. Stone himself. :)
 

peetar

Inactive
I find it hilarious that so many folks are actually falling for this. Just from all the comments in every political thread I can see that the divide and conquer strategy is working perfectly.
 

Ender

Inactive
I'm afraid that Mr. Stone's endorsement, as insincere as that is since it contemplates a prospective choice that he will never need to make, says more about Ron Paul than it does about Mr. Stone himself. :)

Actually, I think your comment says more about YOU, than it does either Stone or Paul. :)
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
I find it hilarious that so many folks are actually falling for this. Just from all the comments in every political thread I can see that the divide and conquer strategy is working perfectly.

Absolutely! We conservatives need to unite behind a scum-sucking RINO/closet liberal because he's OUR SCUM instead of THEIR SCUM. and if we do this long enough, things will change for the better. Right...?
 

peetar

Inactive
Absolutely! We conservatives need to unite behind a scum-sucking RINO/closet liberal because he's OUR SCUM instead of THEIR SCUM. and if we do this long enough, things will change for the better. Right...?

Im sorry, did I say that? after all, it IS working, isn't it? I sure hope you're not blaming me for it.
 

OddOne

< Yes, I do look like that.
I'm watching the 2012 Presidential-election campaigning process with great amusement. I'm used to seeing wedge issues, but this is the first time I can recall seeing wedge candidates. Normally the masses that aren't either enamored with some candidate or deliberately voting against a candidate they outright despise, end up voting for whoever they perceive is the lesser evil. This time around, though, there are no "lesser" evils - all options suck pretty equally. (Including Ron Paul, but more due to the strong probability that if he were elected or looked like a potential front-runner he'd end up having a miraculously out-of-the-norm "health crisis" and end up dead. Then we'd all get to deal with whoever he ended up stuck with as a running mate.)

I don't vote due to religious beliefs (to me, voting for a human government shows a lack of faith in God's plans to usher in His own governance system that will straight-up replace the garbage we have now), but if I did I surely wouldn't be voting for the current crop of crap.
 

Deena in GA

Administrator
_______________
OddOne, I have to agree. For the first time in my life, I seriously believe that I won't vote in the coming election. It saddens me greatly.

And, yeah, I have to say that Stone's endorsement would turn me off even if I were thinking about voting for Paul.
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
just read this FreeRepublic thread on the same subject. what a bunch of dupes!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2837195/posts

i will vote for Paul. i don't agree with the Libertarian angle on some of his issues, but i do know that if we don't end SPENDING (Foreign Aid for starters) and get rid of the FEDERAL RESERVE right now, then it is truly too late to save the Republic. and since Paul is the only one pushing those issues, he is the only one that "gets it".

as far as not voting for "religious reasons", it seems to me that God had a great deal to do with the US coming into existence in the first case to begin with. in fact i would have to say that to not see that represents a great deal of blindness to what was accomplished by our forebears. otoh, i completely agree with the idea that there is yet to come a Kingdom of God that we will not bring about by our human endeavors...
 

OddOne

< Yes, I do look like that.
Hopefully this doesn't become thread drift...

as far as not voting for "religious reasons", it seems to me that God had a great deal to do with the US coming into existence in the first case to begin with. in fact i would have to say that to not see that represents a great deal of blindness to what was accomplished by our forebears. otoh, i completely agree with the idea that there is yet to come a Kingdom of God that we will not bring about by our human endeavors...

The secular authorities stand in their relative positions by God's decree, according to scripture, and I have no doubt that God has used the U.S. in particular to act as a safety mechanism against species-wide self-extermination on more than one occasion. Even now, the U.S. is likely still being used to keep the human sociopolitical world from steering off into a ditch.

However, that being said, Jesus admonished his followers to be no part of Satan's "world" and secular politics is a big and distracting part of Satan's "world," and it's specifically one that will be destroyed and replaced by the Kingdom of God. (Most folks don't "get" that the Kingdom of God isn't just a nebulous ephemeral concept, it's a carefully designed governance system, a true theocracy.) So, voting is completely immaterial: God will see to it that whoever He wants will be in charge where and when He wants them to be in charge, no matter what, and eventually (and the time for this to happen is looming) He'll pull the plug on humanity's efforts at self-governance anyway, in favor of replacing it with His Kingdom.
 
Top