HEALTH FenBen Case Report: BRAF-Positive Malignant Melanoma, age 63, Male

aznurse

Veteran Member
According to Johns Hopkins Medicine, BRAF is a gene found on chromosome seven that encodes a protein also called BRAF. This protein plays a role in cell growth by sending signals inside the cell that promote, among other functions, cell division. When there is a mutation in the BRAF gene, it creates an abnormal protein that sends erroneous signals that lead to uncontrolled cell growth and cancer. When a person has BRAF-positive melanoma, it means their cancer may grow more aggressively. In 40–50% of the patients with advanced melanoma, BRAF gene mutations are present. Interestingly, the BRAF gene mutation is most likely not inherited, which means that most likely an environmental factor led to the mutation.

The following Case Report is from a 63 yr old man who was initially diagnosed with BRAF-positive maliginant melanoma in 2020. Chemotherapy put him into remission but the cancer came back in 2023, which is when he tried a different approach using fenbendazole.

In July of 2020 I had noticed a growth on my hip. It was biopsied and was determined to be a BRAF mutation-positive melanoma which had spread to some of my lymph nodes. My oncologist recommended chemotherapy, tafinlar, which I took for a year and it worked as I was put into remission.
Fast forward to late August 2023: I had a PET scan that showed that the cancer had returned with metastases to my lower abdomen, back next to my spine, leg and four tumors in my ureter. I had follow up biopsies that confirmed that the DNA in the tumors were the BRAF-positive melanoma cells that had returned and had spread.
In December 2023 the tumors had disrupted my ureter causing problems with urination, so I had surgery to remove that tumor. My oncologist wanted me to hold off on scheduled immunotherapy treatments with opdivo (Nivolumab) until I had recovered from the effects of the surgery. My oncologist also stated that nivolumab was by no means a cure of any kind but that it might give me some more time.
A few days later my wife heard about fenbendazole and this Substack through a friend of a friend. I was able to track that person down and he was kind enough to speak with me. He was very encouraging and, because my doctor said that immunotherapy was no cure and I had a traditional treatment-free window ahead of me while recovering, so while I was skeptical of fenbendazole there was really no reason not to give fenbendazole a shot.

I started taking fenbendazole 222 mg once or twice per day around mid-December 2023. As you can see from the graph of the blood tumor markers (which measures the amount of the tumor’s DNA in the blood) for my cancer, that before I started any fenbendazole treatments, that on Nov 29 it was 123.37. Less than 7 weeks later, on Jan 17, 2024, it had dropped to 0.38 and about a month later on Feb 21, 2024 it was 0, zero!
In that time period I did have two immunotherapy treatments but those are not the likely cause of my cancer disappearing for two reasons. First, my oncologist said immunotherapy wouldn’t cure me, just give me more time, maybe. And, two, last week when my oncologist came in to the room to tell me about the Feb 21 blood test she said “I don’t know how to tell you this but there is no evidence of cancer. Nothing. This just doesn’t happen after only two treatments.” Of course she knows nothing about fenben because I didn’t tell her I was taking it.
J. F., Ozark, Missouri, March 7, 2024


Q: How old are you? Weight? How do you feel?
A: 63 years old, 232 lb. when this started. About 170 lbs now and gaining my weight back, which is good. I feel wonderful!

Q: What brand of fenbendazole were you taking? And how many times per day? Any side effects?
A: It is TheLife brand of fenbendazole, and my wife bought it on Amazon. I took 222 mg once or twice a day. There were no side effects from the fenben. FYI I saw the health insurance bill for the immunotherapy drug, opdivo, it was $72,000. My wife spent $60 on the fenbendazole, which is what worked!

Q: Are you still taking fenben?
A: Yes. I take 222 mg once per day.

Summary


Congratulations to J. F. for taking matters into his own hands and having a tremendous outcome. We wish him the best going forward and are greatly appreciative of his sharing his experiences so that others faced with similar circumstances may benefit.

BRAF mutations are not restricted to melanomas alone. Again, according to Johns Hopkins, the cancers associated with the BRAF gene mutation are not specific to one part of the body or a certain cell type and include hairy cell leukemias, non-Hodgkin lymphomas, thyroid cancer, ovarian cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer and certain brain cancers, including glioblastoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, and pediatric low-grade glioma.

In this Case Report, a very aggressive BRAF-positive variant of melanoma appears to have been eradicated by fenbendazole. This report is yet another example of fenbendazole eradicating purported “aggressive” forms of untreatable cancers including triple-negative breast cancers as we’ve previously reported. These results in humans should not be surprising given the wealth of pre-clinical animal data on fenbendazole and mebendazole indicating that these outcomes are to be expected (Doudican, et al., 2013; Simbulan-Rosenthal, et al., 2017 for example, regarding melanomas).

Because J. F. did receive another treatment there could be alternative explanations for his tremendous outcome. First, J. F. did receive two doses of immunotherapy (nivolumab). It is a possibility that that protocol was effective for him in eradicating his BRAF-positive melanoma. Unique individual differences aside, such an outcome would be highly unlikely given the published data on nivolumab as well as J. F.’s oncologist’s expectations and advice.

Second, it is possible that there was an interaction between the two doses of nivolumab, and fenbendazole resulting in a synergistic effect that eradicated the cancer. If this is what happened, it is a major discovery to be further investigated.

Third, fenbendazole alone was the effective anti-cancer agent that eradicated the BRAF-positive melanoma cells. Skimming through the twenty or so references below examining fenbendazole/mebendazole’s role in cancer treatment, indicates that fenbendazole is both necessary and sufficient to achieve the results in experimental pre-clinical models of cancer that J. F. obtained in his own self-treatment cancer clinical trial.

Because the BRAF gene mutation is most likely caused by an environmental factor that led to the mutation, presuming that the factor responsible for the mutation can be eliminated, the possibility of a true cure for BRAF-positive cancers using fenbendazole may be at hand. More on this idea later as we present a more complete discussion as to what cancer is and isn’t in the context of an agent like fenbendazole.

References

Bai RY, Staedtke V, Rudin CM, Bunz F, Figgins GJ. Effective treatment of diverse medulloblastoma models with mebendazole and its impact on tumor angiogenesis. NeuroOncology. 2015; 17:545-54.

Chiang RS, Syed AB, Wright JL, Montgomery B, Srinivas S. Fenbendazole enhancing anti-tumor effect: A case series. Clin. Oncol. Case Rep. 2021; 4:2.

Dobrosotskaya IY, Hammer GD, Schteingart DE, Maturen KE, Worden FP. Mebendazole monotherapy and long-term disease control in metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr. Pract. 2011; 17(3):e59-e62.

Doudican NA, Byron AA, Pollock PM, Orlow SJ. XIAP downregulation accompanies mebendazole growth inhibition in melanoma xenografts. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2013; 24:181-8.

Gallia GL, Holdhoff M, Brem H, Joshi AD, Hann CL, Bai RY, et al. Mebendazole and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: results of a phase 1 clinical trial. Neuro- Oncology Advances. 2021; 3:1-8.

Guerini AE, Triggiani L, Maddalo M, Bonu ML, Frassine F, Baiguini A, Alghisi A. Mebendazole as a candidate for drug repurposing in oncology: An extensive review of current literature. Cancers. 2019; 11:1284.

Meco D, Attina G, Mastrangelo S, Navarra P, Ruggiero A. Emerging perspectives on the antiparasitic Mebendazole as a repurposed drug for the treatment of brain cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023; 24:1334.

Nygren P, Larsson R. Drug repositioning from bench to bedside: tumor remission by the antihelmintic drug mebendazole in refractory metastatic colon cancer. Acta Oncol. 2014; 53(3):427-8.

Nygren P, Fryknas M, Agerup B, Larsson R. Repositioning of the anthelmintic drug mebendazole for the treatment for colon cancer. J. Cancer res. Clin. Oncol. 2013; 139:2133-40.

Pantziarka P, Bouche G, Meheus L, Sukhatme V, Sukhatme VP. Repurposing drugs in oncology (ReDO) - mebendazole as an anti-cancer agent. Ecancer. 2014; 8:443.

Patel, H., Yacoub, N., Mishra, R., White, A., Long, Y., Alanazi, S., & Garrett, J. T. (2020). Current Advances in the Treatment of BRAF-Mutant Melanoma. Cancers, 12(2), 482.

Pinto LC, Soares BM, de Jusus Viana Pinheiro J, Riggins GJ, Assumpcao PP, Burbano RM, Montenegro RC. The anthelmintic drug mebendazole inhibits growth, migration and invasion in gastric cancer cell model. Toxicology in Vitro. 2015; 29:2038-44.

Pinto LC, de Fatima Aquino Moreira-Nunes C, Soares BM, Rodriguez Burbano RM, de Lemos JA, Montenegro R. Mebendazole, an antiparasitic drug, inhibits drug transporters expression in preclinical model of gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis. Toxicology in Vitro. 2017; 43:87-91.

Sasaki JI, Ramesh R, Chada S, Gomyo Y, Roth JA, Mukhopadhyay T. The anthelmintic drug mebendazole induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by depolymerizing tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2002; 2:1201-9.

Simbulan-Rosenthal CM, DDakshanamurthy S, Gaur A, Chen YS, Fang HB, Abdussamad M, et al. The repurposed anthelmintic mebendazole in combination with trametinib suppresses refractory NRASQ61k melanoma. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:12576-95.

Tan Z, Chen L, Zhang S. Comprehensive modeling and discovery of mebendazole as a novel TRAF2- and NCK-interacting kinase inhibitor. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6:33534.

Walk-Vorderwulbecke V, Pearce K, Brooks T, Hubank M, Zwaan cM, Edwards AD, Ancliff P. Targeting acute myeloid leukemia by drug-induced c-MYB degradation. Leukemia. 2018; 32:882- 9.
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
Love to see this.
The more aggressive the cancer is, the better the FenBen works!

No money to be made on a generic medication with few contraindications that works. But a whole lot of money for gene therapy chemotherapies many of which either don't work or if they do they attrit the immune system so much that the next cancer that comes along gets free sailing. FenBen doesn't work on everything but it works on a lot and one has nothing to lose except the $60.

The medical pharmaceutical index is driven by profit and not patient health. One of the big reasons that this nation is bankrupt is because the out of control spending on medicaid and medicare and other health related entitlements. No money to be made in keeping people healthy but they are seen only as cash cows to be milked dry.
 

Southside

Has No Life - Lives on TB
No money to be made on a generic medication with few contraindications that works. But a whole lot of money for gene therapy chemotherapies many of which either don't work or if they do they attrit the immune system so much that the next cancer that comes along gets free sailing. FenBen doesn't work on everything but it works on a lot and one has nothing to lose except the $60.

The medical pharmaceutical index is driven by profit and not patient health. One of the big reasons that this nation is bankrupt is because the out of control spending on medicaid and medicare and other health related entitlements. No money to be made in keeping people healthy but they are seen only as cash cows to be milked dry.
The medical industry is horribly polluted.
Found out today that you cannot sue for medical malpractice in Florida, if you are not:
1) Spouse of the now departed
2) Any child under 20 years of age, of same.

Nice huh. They killed my mom a few weeks ago down there. If the thin veneer of civility ever wears off, I have a few new people occupying my list.
 

GenErik

Veteran Member
Myself and 3 of my brothers convinced my oldest brother suffering from lung cancer to try Fenben. He took it for 2 days and that was it. He died 2 months later. I wonder if he'd still be here if he had continued with the Fenben. I miss him every day
Genny
 

aznurse

Veteran Member
Thanks School Marm! This is my area of research. If it helps just one person it makes my day. Of interest, cancer is hitting the younger population. So, this would be of major importance. One thing I have learned recently is that 80% of chemo drugs are not affective. It is interesting if that is the case. One other thing. If you have a brain tumor such as a glioblastoma and you are contemplating chemo, ask the oncologist if the proposed chemo drug crosses the blood brain barrier. If it does not, then question the efficacy. If the oncologist says yes, research and validate.
 

aznurse

Veteran Member
I did find this very interesting. BTW, I am not campaigning against chemo. I just believe knowledge is power, especially on this subject. Also, this study was dated 11/29/2016, so the data may have changed, maybe better or worse.

Study Explains Why So Many Cancer Drugs Don’t Work​


Diana Zuckerman, PhD, JAMA Internal Medicine: November 29, 2016



Most of us know cancer patients who received drugs that drained their energy and joy of living but didn’t seem to benefit them. In some cases, the cancer stopped growing within a few months and even began to shrink, but ultimately the patient did not seem to live even a day longer.
Why is that?
cancer patient A key problem is that cancer drugs do not have to be proven to prolong anyone’s life in order for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve them. Researchers at the National Cancer Institute and Oregon Health & Science University reviewed all the cancer drugs approved by the FDA from 2008 to 2012 (Kim & Prasad). They found that 26 of the 54 cancer drugs were not required to be proven to prolong or save lives, but instead were approved based on what are called surrogate markers, which are “signs” such as tumor shrinkage that are expected (but not guaranteed) to predict patients’ longer life.
Once the drugs were approved, thousands of patients started taking these drugs and paying for them, despite the lack of evidence of a meaningful health benefit. However, the FDA did require the companies to keep studying the drugs to find out if those medicines were actually extending lives.
The answer, unfortunately, is that many of these drugs did not help patients live longer or better. Only five of the 36 drugs were proven to help patients live longer. Eighteen drugs (50%) failed to extend life and 13 (36%) have unknown impact on survival because no data on them are available to the public. Since companies are very good at sharing information when their drugs are proven effective, experts assume that means those 13 drugs are not proven to work.
In November, the National Center for Health Research published a study looking more carefully at those 18 ineffective drugs. We found that only one was proven to improve quality of life – which isn’t surprising, since cancer drugs so often cause nausea, vomiting, hair loss, and exhaustion. Two made quality of life worse, and the other 15 new cancer drugs either did not improve quality of life (6), or there is not enough evidence to know if they do or not. We also looked at the cost of those cancer drugs and found something that doctors, patients, family members, and lawmakers need to know: the new cancer drugs that are not proven to benefit patients in any way cost just as much as the ones that are effective – up to $170,000 per patient. In fact, the most expensive of the 18 cancer drugs was a thyroid cancer drug (Cabozantinib, also called Cabometyx or Cometriq) that had no benefit to survival compared to placebo, and also caused patients to have a worse quality of life.
Meanwhile, the ineffective cancer drugs remain on the market and Medicare and insurers are still paying for them. When the president of the National Center for Health Research asked FDA officials why they take so long to rescind the approval of ineffective cancer drugs, they stated that they still think those drugs might be effective, but that it is difficult to prove. They pointed out that once a cancer drug is approved, it is very difficult to keep patients in a clinical trial long enough to know if the drug actually saves lives. We agree it is difficult; if a patient is in a clinical trial and not doing well, he or she is likely to drop out, whether they are on the new drug, old drug, or placebo. But that’s a major problem: if the FDA is approving cancer drugs on short-term, inconclusive data, and then requiring better studies that they know are unlikely to be completed appropriately, that’s quite a Catch-22. It means that the FDA is approving cancer drugs knowing that we’ll never know if they are safe and effective or not.
This article is based on this study in JAMA Internal Medicine.[1]
Table 1. Most New Cancer Drugs That Don’t Help Patients Live Longer Also Don’t Improve Their Quality of Life
cancer-drug-table-page-001 https://center4research.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Cancer-Drug-Table-page-001.jpg
 

Hacker

Computer Hacking Pirate
Thanks School Marm! This is my area of research. If it helps just one person it makes my day. Of interest, cancer is hitting the younger population. So, this would be of major importance. One thing I have learned recently is that 80% of chemo drugs are not affective. It is interesting if that is the case. One other thing. If you have a brain tumor such as a glioblastoma and you are contemplating chemo, ask the oncologist if the proposed chemo drug crosses the blood brain barrier. If it does not, then question the efficacy. If the oncologist says yes, research and validate.
There's an Idaho Doc whose patients experienced a 20-fold increase in cancer following receipt of the Vax, suggesting the population of the studies CHANGED from before Covid.
 
Top