ALERT CTC-AM last night (3-14) - Wake up call on drones over America, and more - Must listen!

milkydoo

Inactive
Admins: This is not Unex material! Everything covered in the subject is happening now!

-------

Heard this show last night and was glued to the radio. This guy really pounded it home. Drones were the major topic, but other things surrounding topics covered as well, such as the big gov. ammo buys and mraps, etc. They are preparing to go to war with their own people. I encourage everyone to listen and let this stuff sink in.

ETA: Start at 38:00 min sharp! (the prior segment is on ufos, etc.)

One error I noted: Earlier in the show, the guest states that 47,000 innocents had been killed by drones. Later in the show he said 4,700. Pretty big difference. I suspect the latter is the accurate number; still a huge number, of course.


 
Last edited:

Seeker

3 Bombs for Hawkins
Drones, Guns, & Rights

Date: 03-14-13
Host: George Noory
Guests: Craig Hulet, Stanton Friedman, Noe Torres

Analyst of geopolitics and foreign policy Craig B. Hulet discussed the use of drones in war zones, as well as potential drone strikes on U.S. citizens. He also addressed concerns about the government trying to curb gun rights, and other freedoms. One of the biggest problems with unmanned drones is that "they are absolutely terrible at marksmanship. The collateral damage is always horrendous," he stated, explaining that typically 10-30 civilians are killed when going after a single al-Qaeda terrorist. The drones have no capability of having laser guided missiles or precision targeting, he continued. The US is not "winning the war" in Afghanistan, and has increasingly used drones because they can't sustain this level of warfare any longer, he added.

Obama has been secretive about how the drones are being used, and one of his administration's goals is to have 3,500 drone bases around the world, including domestic, Hulet said. Drones are already in the air in 11 major American cities, including Seattle, where protests against their use have taken place, he reported. Hulet described an incident in North Dakota where a drone was used to assist a SWAT team that came to arrest an armed man accused of stealing cattle. The explanation for the drone's presence was that it was there to secure the safety of the SWAT team.

In what he considers an erosion of citizens' rights and privacy, Air Force drones can now legally spy on you, TSA's "mission creep" is making the country a police state, California is using face recognition scanners to spy on people, and Obama's executive order expands Homeland Security into local law enforcement.

Website(s):

craigbhulet.com
stantonfriedman.com
roswellbooks.com

Book(s):

The Hydra of Carnage
Flying Saucers and Science
Aliens in the Forest: The Cisco Grove UFO Encounter

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2013/03/14
 

TorahTips

Membership Revoked
That was a great program. Just finished listening to it. Drones are something that must just be accepted. They will use them whether they say they are or not.
 

Hacker

Computer Hacking Pirate
That was a great program. Just finished listening to it. Drones are something that must just be accepted. They will use them whether they say they are or not.

Wow! Why don't you just lay down and let them do anything they want to you!

I suggest we all learn how to bring these things down!
 

TorahTips

Membership Revoked
Wow! Why don't you just lay down and let them do anything they want to you!

I suggest we all learn how to bring these things down!

I understand what you are saying. However, the general public has not and will not object. There will be a few people who will object and resist by figuring out how to bring them down. Nevertheless, they have them in the air and I don't see any way to realistically end they dominion. By the time that it flies over, it is gone. And, the potential to take it down is diminished.
 

milkydoo

Inactive
Bump for the overnight crew. This stuff is pure '1984', and we're living it.........right now. Remember the....was it 'telescreens'? I can't recall the name, exactly, but IIRC they were televisions with cameras built in to monitor party members actions in their homes. Party members were expected to act within a certain set of guidelines, lest they be singled out for investigation.

So we have drones instead of telescreens, and the drones monitor everyone's actions, not just bureaucrats and their underlings. Plus, our cell phone cameras, microphones and computer cameras and microphones can all be switched on covertly and used to monitor us. Not to mention the millions of cameras watching the roaming public being fed into super computers with face recognition technology.
 
Last edited:

lili

Senior Member
Listening now. Everyone, find time to listen to George Noory's interview with Craig Hulett. This one is a "must not miss" for sure!
 

TorahTips

Membership Revoked
Bump for the overnight crew. This stuff is pure '1984', and we're living it.........right now. Remember the....was it 'telescreens'? I can't recall the name, exactly, but IIRC they were televisions with cameras built in to monitor party members actions in their homes. Party members were expected to act within a certain set of guidelines, lest they be singled out for investigation.

So we have drones instead of telescreens, and the drones monitor everyone's actions, not just bureaucrats and their underlings. Plus, our cell phone cameras, microphones and computer cameras and microphones can all be switched on covertly and used to monitor us. Not to mention the millions of cameras watching the roaming public being fed into super computers with face recognition technology.

I remember reading 1984 when I was young thinking they will never have the technical ability to monitor anyone anywhere at anytime. I guess I was wrong. This was a great show. It is a "musts listen."
 

DennisRGH

Reset
I understand what you are saying. However, the general public has not and will not object. There will be a few people who will object and resist by figuring out how to bring them down. Nevertheless, they have them in the air and I don't see any way to realistically end they dominion. By the time that it flies over, it is gone. And, the potential to take it down is diminished.

AFAIK, all technology is vulnerable.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/03/15/oregon-company-to-sell-drone-defense-technology-to-public

Oregon Company to Sell Drone Defense Technology to Public

The company says it won't knock drones down, but will stop them from 'completing their mission'

By Jason Koebler
March 15, 2013 RSS Feed Print

Do you want to keep drones out of your backyard?

An Oregon company says that it has developed and will soon start selling technology that disables unmanned aircraft.

The company, called Domestic Drone Countermeasures, was founded in late February because some of its engineers see unmanned aerial vehicles—which are already being flown by law enforcement in some areas and could see wider commercial integration into American airspace by 2015—as unwanted eyes in the sky.

[READ: Maine Police Buy $300 'Toy' Drone That's Illegal to Use]

"I was personally concerned and I think there's a lot of other people worried about this," says Timothy Faucett, a lead engineer on the project. "We've already had many inquiries, a lot of people saying 'Hey, I don't want these drones looking at me.'"

Domestic Drones Countermeasures was formed as a spin-off company from Aplus Mobile, which sells rugged computer processors to defense contractors—though the company won't discuss its specific technology because it is still applying for several patents. Faucett says that work has helped inform its anti-drone technology.

The company will sell land-based boxes that are "non-offensive, non-combative and not destructive." According to the company, "drones will not fall from the sky, but they will be unable to complete their missions."

Though Faucett wouldn't discuss specifics, he says the boxes do not interfere with a drone's navigation system and that it doesn't involve "jamming of any kind." He says their technology is "an adaptation of something that could be used for military application" with the "combat element replaced with a nondestructive element."

[PHOTOS: The Expansion of the Drone]

"We understand the nature of the equipment drone manufacturers are using and understand how to counter their sensors," Faucett says. "We're not going to be countering Predator drones that are shooting cruise missiles, but we're talking about local law enforcement drones and commercial ones that people might be using for spying."

For now, Faucett admits the technology is "expensive," but the company is already ready to design custom anti-drone boxes for customers.

"We envision it could be cheap enough for residential use very soon," he says. "It's quite possible to deploy it if you were shooting a movie and wanted to protect your set, or if you had a house in Malibu and wanted to protect that, we could deploy it there. If a huge company like Google wanted to protect its server farms, it can be scaled up for a larger, fixed installation."

As drones become more commonplace, Faucett says more people will begin searching for a way to protect their privacy.

"The thing that brought it home for me was Senator [Rand] Paul doing the filibuster, there's a lot of unanswered questions," he says. "We think there might be as much business for this counter drone stuff as there is for the drones themselves."
 
Top