ENVR Bill Gates Is Funding a Scheme to Cut Down 70 Million Acres of Forests in North America

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment

Bill Gates Is Funding a Scheme to Cut Down 70 Million Acres of Forests in North America
Let’s Keep the Trees and Get Rid of the Billionaires

By Rhoda Wilson
Global Research, September 08, 2023
The Expose 2 September 2023
Region: USA
Theme: Environment
In-depth Report: Climate Change

***

Bill Gates and other investors are betting Kodama Systems can reduce carbon dioxide in the air by chopping down and burying trees. The move will see 70 million acres of forests, mostly in the Western United States, cut down over the next decade.

After cutting down the trees, Kodama plans to bury them – to reduce global warming. However, “global warming” is a scam to enable the rich to become richer and the real reason for the destruction of forests is to reap saleable carbon offsets.

The Carbon Cycle
The following text in this section is extracted from National Geographic’s encyclopaedia intended for children aged 10 to 13.

Carbon is in a constant state of movement from place to place. It is stored in what are known as reservoirs, and it moves between these reservoirs through a variety of processes, including photosynthesis, burning fossil fuels, and simply releasing breath from the lungs. The movement of carbon from reservoir to reservoir is known as the carbon cycle.

Carbon can be stored in a variety of reservoirs, including plants and animals, which is why they are considered carbon life forms. Carbon is used by plants to build leaves and stems, which are then digested by animals and used for cellular growth.

In the atmosphere, carbon is stored in the form of gases, such as carbon dioxide. It is also stored in oceans, captured by many types of marine organisms. Some organisms, such as clams or coral, use the carbon to form shells and skeletons.

Most of the carbon on the planet is contained within rocks, minerals, and other sediment buried beneath the surface of the planet.

Because Earth is a closed system, the amount of carbon on the planet never changes.

The carbon cycle is vital to life on Earth. Nature tends to keep carbon levels balanced, meaning that the amount of carbon naturally released from reservoirs is equal to the amount that is naturally absorbed by reservoirs. Maintaining this carbon balance allows the planet to remain hospitable for life.

Anthropogenic Climate Change Is a Fraud
The National Geographic Encyclopaedic Entry above ends with the sentence:

“Scientists believe that humans have upset this [carbon] balance by burning fossil fuels, which has added more carbon to the atmosphere than usual and led to climate change and global warming.”

National Geographic must be referring to either corporately funded scientists or scientists employed by corporations. As we will see in the next section, scientists who are truly concerned about the planet and the life it supports reveal the facts.

Anthropogenic or human-caused climate change is a fraud and has been known to be a fraud from the outset. This was demonstrably revealed to the world in 2009 with the release of leaked emails dubbed Climategate.

As it leads into the next section, it’s also worth noting an eye-opening 2013 article published by Forbes that used quotes from climate alarmists to reveal the truth about the climate change agenda. The article was aptly titled: ‘In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their ‘Science’.’

Bill Gates Plans to Cut Down Trees
At the end of July, Forbes was given the task of promoting Gates’ latest plan to destroy and capitalise on the natural world in the name of “climate change” in an article titled: ‘Chop Down Forests to Save the Planet? Maybe Not as Crazy as it Sounds’. Yes, it is as crazy as it sounds.

At least Forbes was honest enough to highlight why the article was being published in its drop head: “Bill Gates and other investors are betting Kodama Systems can reduce carbon dioxide in the air by chopping down and burying trees. Now if only Uncle Sam would get on board with tax credits, too.”

The final sentence gives a clue to what this latest scam is all about – money. Let’s see what the article has to say and how Forbesmanipulates and outright lies to try to sell the idea that Gates and other investors are doing this for the good of the planet.

It’s not long into the article that Forbes links carbon to trading of carbon credits and carbon offsets:

Welcome to the CO2 Monitoring Credit Card that Cuts You Off at Your Carbon Max
Yes, the conventional idea is to plant trees to soak up carbon dioxide from the air and to then sell credits to corporations, private jet owners and others who need or want to offset their emissions. But scientists say burying trees can reduce global warming as well – particularly if those trees would otherwise end up burning or decaying, spewing their stored carbon into the air.

Trees are “spewing” carbon into the air. Really? It’s shameless propaganda.

Forbes may benefit from reading National Geographic’s encyclopaedia for children. And then, if the author feels he can cope with more grown-up content, perhaps he can listen to Patrick Moore explain that the idea of CO2 being a pollutant is dangerous propaganda. Or perhaps he can examine satellite imagery that demonstrates how CO2 as nature’s fertilizer has steadily been enriching Earth’s atmosphere.

And, should Forbes feel it necessary to fall back on the default “human-caused climate crisis” narrative, a study conducted on data from 1750 to 2018 will clarify things for him. The study estimated that the value of the atmospheric concentration of anthropogenic fossil-derived CO2 in 2018 was 46.84 ppm out of a total of 405.40 ppm.

Forbes then turned to wildfires to argue the case for Bill Gates and other investors:

California’s enormous 2020 wildfires drove home the risks to air, property and life posed by overgrown forests … To help address the problem, the U.S. Forest Service aims to thin out 70 million acres of western forests, mostly in California, over the next decade, extracting more than 1 billion tonnes of bone-dry biomass.

According to Roger Pielke, a professor in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Colorado, Canada’s wildfire trends show no increase in recent decades, wildfires used to be much more extensive in past centuries and wildfires are a part of the natural ecosystem.

Wildfires across the world that corporately funded media have enthusiastically publicised have been the result of man’s intervention – but not the human-caused climate change that corporate media supports.

The fires in Greece, Spain, Italy and the Amazon rainforest are most likely due to arson. And regarding the recent fires in Hawaii – there are so many questions without honest answers concerning the destruction of Lahaina in Maui, that even people who normally trust the government are starting to wonder what has really happened there.

Forbes then attempts to justify burying wood in man-made vaults, which should be a nice little earner. In fact, Yale Carbon Containment Lab (“CC Lab”), Kodama’s partner, is hoping to make a business out of “earthen vaults” or “biomass vaults.”

It is customary, after such forest thinning, for logs of marketable size to go to sawmills, with most of the rest piled up and later burned under controlled conditions. Kodama wants to bury the leftovers instead – in earthen vaults designed to maintain dry and anoxic (oxygen-free) conditions and protect the wood from rotting or burning.

CC Lab admits biomass vaults are not viable: “The greatest risk for this project is the high cost to transport wood from dispersed sources to a single storage site. Transporting wet wood is significantly more time and energy-intensive than leaving it in the forest. Logistics greatly impact project viability, even if the price of carbon is high.” And, “the carbon containment value of burying large volumes of wood may be offset partially or totally by the carbon released from the soils when excavating a storage pit.”

Despite this, as MIT Technology Review noted, Merritt Jenkins, Kodama’s co-founder and chief executive, says they plan to earn revenue from their forest thinning work, as well as by selling usable timber and carbon credits from its burial projects.

Forbes summed up the potential benefits for Kodama and its investors:

Along with the [venture capital] seed money, Kodama has already received $1.1 million in grants from California’s forest fire agency and others, as well as purchase commitments for the carbon credits tied to the first 400 tonnes of trees it buries. On the open market, those credits should fetch $200 a tonne. Eventually, Kodama wants to cut down and bury more than 5,000 tonnes of trees a year.

If you want to cut down trees and pelletise them to burn in place of coal, there are tax credits for that too. But not, as of now, for burying them.

So, we can conclude the idea is don’t use the wood, don’t recycle it and don’t allow it to enrich the environment, simply cut trees down and bury them. Does it sound crazy to you?

We have a crisis but it’s not a climate crisis. Green policies are killing people, economies and, increasingly, the planet. The goal to reduce carbon emissions is a scam to enable the rich to become richer off the backs of the poor.

The Investors
Kodama Systems, based in the Sierra Nevada foothills town of Sonora, has been operating in stealth mode since it was founded in the summer of 2021, MIT Technology Review wrote. “Stealth mode”? Is that another way of saying Kodama has been illegally logging and then burying the evidence? If so, the illegal loggers have since raised millions.

In December 2022, Kodama announced that it had raised $6.6 million in a Series Seed funding round co-led by leading climate-technology investors Breakthrough Energy Ventures and Congruent Ventures. Kodama has additionally received a business development grant from California’s forestry and fire protection services CAL FIRE to develop site connectivity and automation for forest thinning, and a carbon removal research and development grant from Frontier Climate for a biomass storage pilot project in partnership with the Yale Carbon Containment Lab.

Breakthrough Energy Ventures (“BEV”) was founded by Bill Gates and is backed by many of the world’s top business leaders, BEV has raised more than $2 billion in committed capital to support cutting-edge companies that are leading the world to net-zero emissions. BEV is a purpose-built investment firm that is seeking to invest, launch and scale global companies that will eliminate greenhouse gas emissions throughout the economy as soon as possible.

Congruent Ventures is a leading early-stage venture firm focused on partnering with entrepreneurs to build companies addressing climate and sustainability challenges. Congruent is one of the most active US investors in climate. Its portfolio represents companies that will “help to decarbonise” every sector of the economy – energy, fleet electrification, farming, new food products, sustainable aviation fuels, manufacturing, and more. In April 2023, it had more than $700 million in assets under management.

Frontier Climate was founded by Stripe, Alphabet, Shopify, Meta, McKinsey and tens of thousands of businesses using Stripe Climate. Frontier aims to act as the middleman between buyers and sellers of carbon removal. What this means in simple terms is buyers decide how much they want to spend on carbon removal each year, Frontier aggregates the buyers’ budgets and then pays suppliers to remove the carbon.

MIT Technology Review reported that on 15 December Stripe revealed it would provide a $250,000 research grant to Kodama and Yale Carbon Containment Lab as part of a broader carbon removal announcement. That grant will support a pilot effort to bury waste biomass harvested from California forests in the Nevada desert and study “how well it prevents the release of greenhouse gases that drive climate change.”

Stripe also agreed to purchase about 415 tonnes of carbon dioxide eventually sequestered by Kodama for another $250,000, if that proof-of-concept project achieves certain benchmarks.

For the last several years, Stripe has pre-purchased tonnes of carbon dioxide that start-ups aim to eventually draw out of the air and permanently sequester, in an effort to help build up a carbon removal industry.

Let’s Keep the Trees and Get Rid of the Billionaires
Even scientists who have been bought off or indoctrinated with the “climate crisis” ideology have had enough of the billionaires’ antics. Some have called for a shareholder-based carbon tax. The wealthiest 10 per cent in the USA are the source of 40 per cent of US national greenhouse gas emissions, they say. And, the wealthiest 1 per cent of households are responsible for between 15 per cent and 17 per cent of emissions.

And increasingly, climate activists are setting their sights on the 1 per cent. Billionaires’ lifestyles are unsustainable, billionaires are bad for the planet they say. We may agree for different reasons but we do agree that billionaires are bad for the planet.



*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Featured image is from The Expose

The original source of this article is The Expose
Copyright © Rhoda Wilson, The Expose, 2023
 
Last edited:

20Gauge

TB Fanatic
"Because Earth is a closed system, the amount of carbon on the planet never changes."

Really? Last I checked we get outside additions regularly. Big ones on occasion such as asteriods..... BS
 

LoupGarou

Ancient Fuzzball
Oh, there is a cycle all right. One might call it "BOHICA"...

From their own LinkedIn page...

Kodama_Systems.jpg
They are a new (2021), small (2-10 employees) company that deals with Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing.
They seem to match up other Forest product companies with sources of feedstock, or ones that have "a need".

They can collect the millions, as well as the carbon credits, and make millions off of the deals.

I think I see one of the cycles now...
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Why would you laugh at this? Bill and his fellow demons are deadly earnest about this. It's insanity meant to kill us all.
And they've just come up with a plan to combat climate change that is every bit as stupid as the plan they announced last year to combat climate change by blocking the sun. They may be deadly earnest but they are also laughably stupid.

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez levels of stupid. They have got to be smoking something good to be coming up with such ideas.
 

TheSearcher

Are you sure about that?
And they've just come up with a plan to combat climate change that is every bit as stupid as the plan they announced last year to combat climate change by blocking the sun. They may be deadly earnest but they are also laughably stupid.

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez levels of stupid. They have got to be smoking something good to be coming up with such ideas.
I'm not sure if they are "stupid" so much as they are trying to do things to kill us, while gaslighting us by saying they are doing something to help. They have got to know it won't work.
 

Elza

Veteran Member
When biomass rots or burns it it releases high amounts of methane and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere...
Absolutely. And while they are living they take in CO2 and put off oxygen. I learned this is grade school.

But the commies have destroyed our schools. Young people today are too ignorant to know this little fact. They now believe only what they read on the internet.

And if it comes from Bill Gates it has to be true. /sarc
 

Sub-Zero

Veteran Member
When biomass rots or burns it it releases high amounts of methane and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere...

The dude is straight up trying to cause GW
Oxygen will be reduced as well. There is a higher oxygen level on the southeast coast of the United States than on the upper west coast due to our forests. Think Gulf Stream and how it flows.
Are they going to pay lumberjacks to use only saws and not gas powered chainsaws? Are they planning to dig the holes to bury them using only shovels and pickaxes?
 

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
The levels of insanity keep rising. Carbon sequestration is another pie in the sky idea, which they are going full speed ahead on. It is all about keeping our money from making it into our pocket.

People will give of their time and money to save the planet....."The Report from Iron Mountain". Expect the aliens to be popping up soon as it too was in the Report, dated 1967.
 

lauri60

Contributing Member
Anymore when any of the so called "elites" come up with a new idea, it is like a cross between a train wreck, the Keystone Cops, and a clown show. Ya know it is going to be a disaster, ya know it is going to make no common sense and will make things worse, but there is nothing you can do but sit back, dig in and try to mitigate the damage rolling down hill towards you.
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
Come on people. Trees soak up valuable sunlight that could be used by solar panels. /s

I don't portend to understand the logic.

I suspect it will somehow be connected to the "rube goldberg" plans to produce and use hydrogen and subterranean carbon sequestration.

I was taught about photosynthesis and plant respiration before the 8th grade.

Don't forget how much water these trees drink. That angle may be in play as well.
 

greysage

On The Level
Trust the science

At a meeting this Summer, I suggested hiring a forestry-mulcher, like the kind that can be attached to tracked skid-steer. To mow down an area of smaller dead trees, fallen branches, and piles of storm damage branches that were innocently put at a woods edge throughout the years.

Me: It'll look a lot nicer. People will be able to walk into the woods without being impaled. It'll also reduce fire risk near property.

Other Person: Oh no. That would be an unnecessary expense, and it would immediately release all that carbon into the atmosphere.

Other People There: Mmmmm...that makes a lot of sense.
 

jward

passin' thru
Ya know, I've long been in the "I like and respect animals far more than most humans" camp
..but this kinda nonsense makes me realize I even value the TREES more than some "humans" in particular, the ones coming u with all these life denying evil schemes.

as to motive, in addition to the carbon-scam, doing away with trees impacts our abilities to be autonomous- remember, their goal is we live in 600sf inner city ghettos, with them doling out all the necessities of life.
Being able to provide our own food, heating/cooling/sanitation/medicine/defense/etc is all an impediment to their goals.
 

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
At a meeting this Summer, I suggested hiring a forestry-mulcher, like the kind that can be attached to tracked skid-steer. To mow down an area of smaller dead trees, fallen branches, and piles of storm damage branches that were innocently put at a woods edge throughout the years.

Me: It'll look a lot nicer. People will be able to walk into the woods without being impaled. It'll also reduce fire risk near property.

Other Person: Oh no. That would be an unnecessary expense, and it would immediately release all that carbon into the atmosphere.

Other People There: Mmmmm...that makes a lot of sense.
I don't know... or care!... about what it might do to the carbon (wondering how chipping it up suddenly "releases it into the atmosphere!), but unless you are then going to mow and maintain the areas where you removed the trees and opened up the canopy to sunlight, in most places, it will grow into an impenetrable jungle of brambles, weed trees and other happy understory growth within 2 years.

Summerthyme
 
Last edited:

West

Senior
I don't know... or care!... about what it might do to the carbon (wondering how chipping it up suddenly "releases it into the atmosphere!), but unless you are then going to mow and maintain the areas where you removed the trees and opened up the canopy to sunlight, in most places, it will grow into an impenetrable jungle of brambles, weed trees and other happy understood growth within 2 years.

Summerthyme
Right.

But if they slightly and if needed terrace the land, then plant native and usable trees. Then come back and thin while clearing brush a few years later. Then thin again in another decade. A great super healthy native forest will be thriving in just two to three decades.

Of course it would need to be thinned again periodically for dead and or dieing trees. Select cutting works almost as well as clear cutting every three decades plus or minus.

What's sad is most people think all trees live forever. And there insanely stupid. Just like the OPs piece. Just plane stupid. Rotten wood not only causes harmful greenhouse gasses, but the bugs that feast on said rotten wood double the green house gasses.

This idea is as good if not better than clean air in a can...

China-sells-Air-in-a-Can.jpg
 

Craftypatches

Veteran Member
With less trees means more wind! Think depression era! Already many animals are on the extinct list! They will probably say, oh that means more wind power. It will upset the entire balance of nature in ways these retards haven’t even thought about! Trees are here for a reason! They need to start believing in God not their idiotic brains!
 

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
Right.

But if they slightly and if needed terrace the land, then plant native and usable trees. Then come back and thin while clearing brush a few years later. Then thin again in another decade. A great super healthy native forest will be thriving in just two to three decades.

Of course it would need to be thinned again periodically for dead and or dieing trees. Select cutting works almost as well as clear cutting every three decades plus or minus.

What's sad is most people think all trees live forever. And there insanely stupid. Just like the OPs piece. Just plane stupid. Rotten wood not only causes harmful greenhouse gasses, but the bugs that feast on said rotten wood double the green house gasses.

This idea is as good if not better than clean air in a can...

China-sells-Air-in-a-Can.jpg
Oh, I'm far from being against intelligent forest management. But too many people think if they cut a bunch of trees I a woods, only leaving the "pretty" ones with large crowns, they'll get a par-klike setting. Ha! Not unless they then mow (or graze) the open areas religiously... and that's one of the worst things you can do for tree health, wildlife and soil health.

I'll admit I she'd a few tears back in 2006 when we did a selective timber cut of our 60 acre woodlot... letting them mark one huge, perfect black cherry I privately thought of as the "Queen of the Woods" hurt. Sale for several gorgeous, huge and healthy oaks.

But you're absolutely correct that unmanaged "old growth" forests are basically nursing homes for trees! They will eventually renew themselves, but they are very sad to see, if you understand forest health.

When we sold our farm, it had been 14 years since we'd sold the timber, and the Amish buyer paid a premium *because* it was ready for another harvest. In the meantime, we'd heated our home with the cull trees hubby cut in the routine management for high quality timber.

I wish a tree would drop on Bill Gates head!

Summerthyme
 
Top