I haven't started a thread on survival for some time because I became frustrated that while many people talked the talk, very few walked the walk. Everyone on this forum should recognize by now that it isn't a matter of whether bad times are on the way but rather when they will begin to occur and how bad they will be. So, why beat a dead horse?
Similar sentiments are found on a recent thread on The Oil Durm:
http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/2/12/15430/0735#comments
However, I was renergized by an excellent reply by Doc1 regarding his experience with Katrina on this thread:
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=186016
From a survival perspective, you must assume that the event or events that trigger collapse will occur no later then tomorrow morning. And, further, that the results will be worse then your worst nightmare. I intentionally used the word "collapse" because it avoids the usual mental masterbation that goes along with trying to prepare for a future where things aren't too good but not too bad. There are dozens of potential show-stoppers that could (and I believe will) cause a real collapse of society.
Replies to these statements typically fall into four categories: First, there are plenty of resources left and new technology will save the day in any case. There is nothing to worry about. Second, society will never collapse no matter what. Third, there is plenty of time to prepare. Fourth, the poster "can't do it." So, having heard it all before why have I resurrected the horse? I could claim some sort of moral imperative - but I can't. In fact, my reason is quite selfish; the more people who are prepared, the better my life will be - and so will everyone else's. I recognize that life will not be easy even with serious preparation. However, having grown up during WWII when there wasn't much stuff and most of what was there was rationed, I know life can still be fullfilling and even my grandparents 19th century lives were tolerable.
I think by now anyone who has read my posts over the past years recognizes that I believe people need to move out of harm's way and head for the hills. I debated whether to re-write what I had posted before or to simply link to an old post of mine that I believe is still valid. I chose the latter course because this one also includes many excellent comments:
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=72776
Well, I have pruning to do and a strawberry bed to clean out and firewood to cut...
Todd
Similar sentiments are found on a recent thread on The Oil Durm:
http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/2/12/15430/0735#comments
However, I was renergized by an excellent reply by Doc1 regarding his experience with Katrina on this thread:
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=186016
From a survival perspective, you must assume that the event or events that trigger collapse will occur no later then tomorrow morning. And, further, that the results will be worse then your worst nightmare. I intentionally used the word "collapse" because it avoids the usual mental masterbation that goes along with trying to prepare for a future where things aren't too good but not too bad. There are dozens of potential show-stoppers that could (and I believe will) cause a real collapse of society.
Replies to these statements typically fall into four categories: First, there are plenty of resources left and new technology will save the day in any case. There is nothing to worry about. Second, society will never collapse no matter what. Third, there is plenty of time to prepare. Fourth, the poster "can't do it." So, having heard it all before why have I resurrected the horse? I could claim some sort of moral imperative - but I can't. In fact, my reason is quite selfish; the more people who are prepared, the better my life will be - and so will everyone else's. I recognize that life will not be easy even with serious preparation. However, having grown up during WWII when there wasn't much stuff and most of what was there was rationed, I know life can still be fullfilling and even my grandparents 19th century lives were tolerable.
I think by now anyone who has read my posts over the past years recognizes that I believe people need to move out of harm's way and head for the hills. I debated whether to re-write what I had posted before or to simply link to an old post of mine that I believe is still valid. I chose the latter course because this one also includes many excellent comments:
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=72776
Well, I have pruning to do and a strawberry bed to clean out and firewood to cut...
Todd