While checking out the WHO's Web site, I found it interesting that the spread of droplets from a person with the flu can travel six feet, while the spread of droplets from persons with the Ebola virus can only manage to project their saliva one foot during a hearty sneeze.
I'm concerned about the motive/reason for the 'mandatory' Ebola/Rabies vaccine that the U.S. government wants to put in to play in America, the stated objective being that it would provide immunity to the Ebola virus.
The government doesn't mandate vaccination for the flu, and on average, 36,000 people die from the flu in the U.S. every year, while 4,023 people have died from the Ebola virus in the same amount of time.
The word I don't like is 'mandatory.' Isolation, containment, and proper hygiene and hydration therapy has proven effective in past Ebola outbreaks. Why wouldn't they prove just as effective now?
I'm uncertain, at this juncture, as to what to believe about the likely range and extent of a global Ebola pandemic, but am prepping as well as I can, as usual. I think we'll all know a lot more about what we're facing realistically by the end of the year - at least on this front, but with all the conflicting data floating around, and the CDC's constant assertions and then retractions, I get the feeling that no one knows, with any degree of certainly, what they're doing.
What do you think?
Artie.
I'm concerned about the motive/reason for the 'mandatory' Ebola/Rabies vaccine that the U.S. government wants to put in to play in America, the stated objective being that it would provide immunity to the Ebola virus.
The government doesn't mandate vaccination for the flu, and on average, 36,000 people die from the flu in the U.S. every year, while 4,023 people have died from the Ebola virus in the same amount of time.
The word I don't like is 'mandatory.' Isolation, containment, and proper hygiene and hydration therapy has proven effective in past Ebola outbreaks. Why wouldn't they prove just as effective now?
I'm uncertain, at this juncture, as to what to believe about the likely range and extent of a global Ebola pandemic, but am prepping as well as I can, as usual. I think we'll all know a lot more about what we're facing realistically by the end of the year - at least on this front, but with all the conflicting data floating around, and the CDC's constant assertions and then retractions, I get the feeling that no one knows, with any degree of certainly, what they're doing.
What do you think?
Artie.