GOV/MIL Leftists Call For New "Secret Police" Force To Spy On Trump Supporters (AN ABSOLUTELY MUST-READ THREAD)

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Glenn Youngkin just gutted Virginia’s state CRT office…
Posted by Kane on January 20, 2022 4:35 am

1642671480334.png

Glenn Youngkin has asked all of the state’s DEI employees to resign and tapped anti-critical race theory leader Angela Sailor to lead the department. In her first move, Sailor eliminated the word “equity” and replaced it with “opportunity.” Angela Sailor, a former policy expert at The Heritage Foundation was formally named the state’s new DEI director of diversity, equity and inclusion.

Youngkin also issued an executive order to refocus the DEI office, tasking Sailor and her staff to work on economic opportunity, cooperation among religious groups, promoting “free speech and civil discourse” at colleges and universities, and ensuring that Virginia’s history curriculum is “honest, objective, and complete.”

1642671556436.png

View: https://youtu.be/_krLXi0CrPg
1:06:16 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

US Army Guerrilla Warfare Exercise To Target "Freedom Fighters"

THURSDAY, JAN 20, 2022 - 12:15 PM
Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

The US Army is set to conduct a “guerrilla warfare exercise” later this month in North Carolina where troops will battle against “freedom fighters.”


Yes, really.

The two week “unconventional warfare exercise” will take from from Jan. 22-Feb. 4 on privately owned land in a remote location which remains unknown.
“Called Robin Sage, the exercise serves as a final test for Special Forces Qualification Course training and it places candidates in a politically unstable country known as Pineland,” reports the Charlotte Observer.

“These military members act as realistic opposing forces and guerrilla freedom fighters, also known as Pineland resistance movement,” said the the U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center.
Information about the exercise was provided to the media in a bid to avoid civilians confusing the drills with actual terrorist attacks or warfare, which has happened before.
“It will be realistic enough to include the sounds of gunfire (blanks) and flares,” said the center.
As Chris Menahan notes, a similar Robin Sage exercise in 2019 showed resistance fighters displaying a flag that says “liberty.”
“They could tell these soldiers they’re battling the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, North Koreans or other foreign enemies but instead they have them training to kill “freedom fighters” with “Liberty” flags,” writes Menahan.
The exercise will do little to dampen concerns that the Biden administration is launching a de facto ‘domestic war on terror’ targeting patriots and Trump supporters.

Following the January 6 Capitol riot, Democrats ludicrously compared the events to September 11 in an attempt to justify using federal resources that would normally be focused on actual terrorists against American conservatives.

Earlier this month, the Justice Department created a new “specialized unit focused on domestic terrorism” in response to an “elevated” threat from violent extremists in the United States.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1480932275504226313
2:34 min


However, polls show that Americans are split on who represents the biggest threat, particularly after the Waukesha attack, its subsequent cover up, in addition to the fact that left-wing extremists spent much of 2020 rioting and burning down American cities.

A recent Schoen Cooperman Research survey found that voters are split on domestic extremism, with 23 per cent naming left-wing extremism and 21 per cent naming right-wing extremism as the greater concern.

Following the January 6 incident, Army General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he wanted to understand “white rage,” although an interest in understanding “black rage” after a sustained period of violent mayhem caused by Black Lives Matter protesters wasn’t seemingly of any importance.

View: https://youtu.be/0TxlJOd3Wxs
11:55 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

This is exactly what is going on…
Posted by Kane on January 21, 2022 1:29 am

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1484344136555630599
1:53 min
Thought-provoking hit as James Lindsay and Joe Rogan discuss the parallel between Marxist indoctrination in American public schools and the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

1642756520301.png
1642756563675.png
1642756624853.png

(See website for rest of tweet thread)

^^^^^
Full podcast: #1767 - James Lindsay

1642756892743.png

Jan 20 3 hrs 12 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(France)


Social Justice Slams Into Europe, Part 1: In France, Wokeism's A Oui Bit Different

FRIDAY, JAN 21, 2022 - 03:30 AM
Authored by Richard Bernstein, submitted by RealClearInvestigations,

This is the first of two articles - Part 2: In Scotland, They'll Take the Woke Road - will be published tomorrow.


Rachel Khan is a 45-year-old writer and actress, half Gambian, half Polish Jew born and educated in France, who was appointed by the mayor of Paris to be co-director of a cultural center called La Place, or The Place, dedicated to hip-hop music in France. Then she became a target of the wrath of “le wokisme,” French version.


Khan, who was already well-known as a dissenter from the identity-politics orthodoxy on race and victimization, published a slim volume titled “Racée” — meaning racy, daring, but also a play on words — in which she lampooned the politically correct idea that to be authentically black meant that she had to incarnate a “woke” ideology.

“It's supposedly anti-racism, but in fact it's dogma,” she told me in Paris in November. “A black actress is supposed to be anti-colonialist. But just as I'm not obliged as a black actress to play a cleaning lady or a prostitute, I'm also not obliged as a black person to be 'anti-colonial.'”

For her pains Khan was attacked on social media and elsewhere, called a traitor to her race.

Early in November, some 50 journalists, producers, bloggers and artists circulated a petition demanding that she be fired from her position at The Place, on the grounds that her ideas are “unacceptable and divisive, validated by the most reactionary fringe of the French media and far-right politicians.”

This attack prompted a rejoinder from France’s minister of education, Jean-Michel Blanquer, who tweeted, “Our friend @KhanNRachel suffers from permanent harassment.”

As Blanquer's rejoinder shows, Khan has her supporters in France, where she has become something of a media darling, turned to when an anti-woke voice is needed. Still, her book, the attacks on her, and the defense of her from the high reaches of the French government all show that “le wokisme” has become a hot topic in France, around which the debate sometimes reaches a fever pitch.

“Woke activism, which has wreaked havoc in the U.S., has disembarked on our shores,” French journalist Brice Couturier said on French radio while promoting his new book, “OK, Millennials! Puritanism, Victimization, Identity Politics, and Censorship: A Baby Boomer's Investigation Into the Myths of a Woke Generation.” “An intense intellectual battle has just begun.”

But why now, and why in a country like France, with its very different history from the United States? For that matter, why has wokeism taken hold in other European countries, where the radical movement seems in many ways to be an imitation of its American counterpart?


Eric Zemmour: The "French Trump" embodies the backlash to wokeness.


In France, there's an oft-noted irony within the answer. Despite vocabulary that seems appropriated from American academia, the main concepts originated with a group of leftist French academics in the 1960s and 1970s, who became the rage in many American universities and whose ideas, though simplified and sometimes caricatured, have been enthusiastically reimported into France.

The most influential figure was Michel Foucault, the psychologist and philosopher whose lifelong sympathy for marginalized groups and oppressed people led him to a sustained reflection on the dominating and exploitative nature of power, including its ability to define what is supposedly normal – as opposed to what it considers abnormal or sick.

In matters such as gay rights and equality for women, Foucault-like sympathy for the marginalized feels the same on both sides of the Atlantic. But American wokeness is most powerfully concentrated on a question of race that seems unique to America. Centuries ago, Europe may have engaged in the slave trade, but no European country has anything comparable to the history of American slavery, no decades of Jim Crow, no Ku Klux Klan, no lynchings or legal segregation of the sort that afflicted black America, and also no civil rights movement, no Martin Luther King Jr., and no George Floyd killed in Minnesota. And yet, the vocabulary of critical race theory, with terms like le racism systematique, le privilège blanc, microaggression, even le fragilité blanc, has taken hold in France like an invasive species.

Part of the answer seems to be the contagious global appeal of a doctrine explaining complicated questions, holding the same attraction for French academics, students, and others as for their American counterparts. The appeal is especially strong for a younger generation impatient and dissatisfied with the more moderate views of traditional liberalism — or, in France, the traditional left, even if it was the same enlightened left that fought against colonialism, against anti-Semitism, against the powerful, conservative Catholic Church, as well as for choice on abortion, equal access to education, and France's extensive social safety net.

Then there's the matter of demographic change. Britain, Germany, and France have substantially increased their minority populations through high immigration and higher birth rates among non-whites. This has generated two conflicting reactions. One is the increased strength and appeal of right-wing anti-immigrant parties, in France represented most conspicuously these days by a former television personality, Eric Zemmour, who to his detractors looms as a French Trump.

Attuned to Anti-Muslim Bias
On the other side there's a young new left, fearful and alienated from figures like Zemmour, attuned to anti-immigrant (and especially anti-Muslim) prejudice, which, in their view of things, is roughly equivalent to anti-black prejudice in America.

“It's an excessive reaction to a real problem,” Pierre Haski, a French journalist and radio commentator, said in an interview in Paris. “All of these issues, racism, etc., have been discussed for a long time, but the conversation has become brutal.”

Haski speaks of a generational difference. Young French blacks, born and educated in the country, feel completely French, he said, equal to their white French counterparts, who often sympathize with them, and are not hesitant to make demands on French society that their elders and previous generations of immigrants were hesitant to make. “The young generation is completely invested in this question,” Haski said.

One striking difference with the U.S., however, is that many of France’s most prominent public intellectuals have taken positions against the phenomenon, which may render it less potent than its American version. In France, for example, woke activists are not proposing to eliminate entrance exams to high schools and universities, or mandating racial sensitivity training in major corporations. At least not yet.

Still, there are plenty of “woke” eruptions and a sense that a radical ideology, based on the ideas of systemic racism, guilt over colonialism, and white privilege, is making headway in the media, in schools, and especially in the minds of young people.

“The schools are infected by ideology,” one teacher, Fatiha Agag-Bourdjahlat, told the French daily Le Figaro. “They advance it behind masks, using their classes and their authority as teachers to do propaganda under cover of generosity and respect for 'diversity.'

Adding to that, there have been enough incidents of deplatforming for the French media to have adopted the term “la cancel culture,” in the original English. Last year, feminist philosopher Sylviane Agacinski — whose writings strongly influenced France's adoption of a law requiring political party lists to be at least 50% female — was prevented from speaking at the University of Bordeaux, where she was denounced in a social media avalanche as “reactionary, transphobic and homophobic.” Agacinski became anathema to campus groups like the Anti-Patriarchy Student Collective for expressing opposition to state-funded medically assisted fertility treatments for single women.

“It's a religious cult without God,” the essayist and novelist Pascal Bruckner said in an interview at his apartment in the Marais district of Paris. “The French left has run out of ideas, so it has turned to the American idea that the white man is intrinsically guilty.”

His critique echoes the views of American linguist John McWhorter. But French wokeness also has its own distinct flavor and motivations, centering on two emotionally fraught and conflict-ridden issues. One is the history of French colonialism, which is treated by the wokish side of the debate in France in much the same way that the history of slavery and Jim Crow are treated in the United States, as a kind of original sin, the deep cause of continuing racial and ethnic inequalities.

Secondly, identity politics in France is inseparable from one of the main sources of political conflict in the country, namely immigration from Africa and the deep worry of many in France — left, right, and center — over what is called Islamization, or the radicalization of parts of the Muslim population of the country. (At an estimated 5.7 million, it is the largest in Europe.)

“Wokism transforms the Muslims into an oppressed group,” Bruckner said. “It's the ultimate metamorphosis of leftism in France into Third Worldism,” the idea that most of the problems in the world, and certainly all of its inequalities, stem from the white man's colonialist exploitation of Africa, the Middle East, and Asia.


Slayings like those of the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists (memorial above) have provoked a backlash.


“Guilt over colonialism provides the entryway for wokeness in France,” Robert Ménard, the mayor of the southern French city of Béziers, told me. “It's what leads to the accusation of Islamophobia whenever anyone tries to talk about the connection between radical Islam in France and terrorist violence in the country, as if there were no such connection.”

The reference was to a series of deadly terrorist incidents fomented by Muslim extremists in France over the last few years, including attacks in 2015 that killed 130 people, the murder of eight journalists at the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo earlier that year, and last year, the beheading by an 18-year-old Muslim extremist of a schoolteacher, Samuel Paty, after he showed satirical cartoons of the prophet Mohammed to his class as part of a lesson on free speech.

This recent history is no doubt partly responsible for the acrimony surrounding some aspects of the woke ideology, which some critics, including those on the traditional liberal-left, see as making excuses for terrorism by blaming France's colonialist history as ultimately responsible.

Earlier this year, the French national assembly passed a law aimed at combating what is seen as the growth of an Islamic ideology in France. It imposed limitations on religious garb in public, on home schooling (following reports of private “clandestine schools” run by Islamic militants), and banned “virginity certificates,” demanded by some religious groups as a condition of marriage.

Opponents of the measure, known as the “anti-separatist law,” which included both some of the traditional leftist factions like the Socialist Party as well as Muslim groups, attacked it as both discriminatory and racist.

“The anti-separatism law is part of a long line of racist French legislation, past or present,” read a statement by Les Indigènes de la République,” the Natives of the Republic, one of several militant groups in France with a following among the young, including young immigrants or children of immigrants. “Of course, it is Islamophobic since we are indeed witnessing a new and formidable stage of the Islamophobia of the state.”

The deeper argument has to do with the values and ideas that have long reigned in France and that are being challenged by the new wokist left. For example, the supporters of the anti-separatism law described it as a defense of what the law itself calls “Republican principles.” Its main idea is that France is governed by certain universal values that apply to all citizens regardless of race or religion -- a color-blind logic under which France (like postwar Germany) does not collect demographic data on ethnicity. Yet according to the anti-racist movement, such values have been used to perpetuate white dominance.

“Universalism is a utopia and a myth that the Republic tells about itself that does not correspond to any past or present reality,” Rokhaya Diallo, a French-born writer and filmaker of Senegalese and Gambian origins, has said in interviews. “For black and non-white people, the Republic has always been a space of inequality, triggered by colonization.”

Diallo, whose books include “Racism: A Guide” and “France Belongs to Us,” is probably the most prominent figure in France advancing the anti-racist agenda. She is a frequent guest on television and radio where she has criticized police for what she calls racist violence against blacks, a blogger and a columnist for the Washington Post, and her visibility has made her a target. In “Racée,” Rachel Khan called Diallo “an entrepreneur of victimization” whose “ambition, under the guise of justice and equality, is to cause division.” In a television program last year, Bruckner argued that she had helped to instigate the hatred against Charlie Hebdo that led to the deadly attack on the paper, a comment that Diallo angrily denounced as “scandalous” and “disrespectful.”

“It's because there aren't very many people like me, who look like me and who say things that are still taboo in France [and] have access to the media,” Diallo told me during a recent interview in Paris, explaining the reasons both for her prominence as a sort of Madame Woke in France and the attacks against her.

'Led by Spoiled, Privileged Students'
“I talk about racism, the racism of the state and about historical oppression,” Diallo said. “I'm visible. But I'm practically the only person of color in France who plays a role as an editorialist on television, where there are still very few blacks, Asians, or Arabs. I feel alone, isolated. When I appear on some panel, usually with three other people, I'm usually the only one taking my point of view. I'm very rarely invited to speak at the university in France. There are more and more academics who study the question of racism and the history of slavery, but they have hard times getting stable positions in academia in France and many of them have to work abroad. So to say that the universities are a kind of headquarters of wokeness, that's not my experience.

“It would be a good beginning,” she continued, “for France to begin to recognize that there is racism here, to recognize the French role in slavery, to make it known.”

In a way this points to the main difference between Diallo and her camp and the traditional left, which would hotly dispute her charge that nobody before now has taken into account France's role in slavery or the existence of racism in the country. The point for them is that there are aspects of France’s recent history that the “woke” are not awakened to: namely, the real and present danger of Muslim fanaticism.

“The French Muslim youth are being subjected to fundamentalist propaganda that convinces them that the entire French Republic hates Islam, in order to radicalize them,” Caroline Fourest, a feminist writer and filmmaker, said in an interview with RCI. “But when you speak out about the danger of this propaganda, those who are in denial on the left accuse you of 'Islamophobia,' and then the far right takes advantage of this situation to gain speed.

“This is the problem,” she continued. “Because they don't see the difference between racism and a legitimate concern, the woke left, often led by spoiled, privileged students living in their bubbles at universities, are opening the gates that help propel fundamentalism forward, and that is reaching the youth.”

A group known as the Mothers' Front, in the heavily Muslim suburb of Bagnolet, north of Paris, was granted space recently for a public exhibition, sparking a vehement protest by other residents of the district who described the Mothers' Front as a radical, Islamist group. The group's documents are a vehement attack on the schools for alleged racism and Islamophobia, including statements like these:
  • “Our children understand from an early age that there's a problem at school if they have frizzy hair, or if they speak an African language, or if their religion is Islam.”
  • “Our children are subjected to an academic program where non-white people from whom they come are infantilized, demonized or made invisible.”
  • “Our students go to establishments where they are stigmatized and humiliated by certain teachers.”
“Where is this racist school?” reads a public letter written by the protesting group of Bagnolet residents. “Where are these malicious teachers? Nowhere in reality, and we all know that.”

“To speak of the state and the schools as systemically racist is to declare war on the republic,” Marilou Brossier, a neighborhood activist, told me. “Never in a French school does one treat black children differently from white ones. This is what's directly related to the values of the republic. France is built on an idea of universalism, that each individual is a free citizen living in a secular republic, but the woke mania for identifying everybody as black, or Muslim, or whatever stands in direct contradiction to this fundamental principle.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Michigan school put litter boxes in the bathroom for students that ‘identify as cats’…
Posted by Kane on January 21, 2022 11:17 pm

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1484693362456162306
1:11 min
I’m troubled by the headline. Running CFP and writing headlines is so weird sometimes.

Midland Public Schools in Michigan.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Fairfax County high school forces students to play ‘White Privilege Bingo’…
Posted by Kane on January 22, 2022 12:26 am



Virginia’s largest school district is on the defensive after it was caught forcing children to participate in a game of “privilege bingo” that singled out kids for characteristics involving their race and family life.

Students at Fairfax County’s Oakton High School were asked to self-identify their privilege for an exercise that the district says “was intended to provide students with an opportunity to reflect on their own experiences while building their critical thinking skills.”

The bingo card contained squares based on categories such as “white, military kid, parents are married, mentally healthy, cisgender, have your own bedroom, Christian, and able-bodied.”

The district initially defended the lesson plan. Assistant Superintendent Douglas A. Tyson said that the card came from an approved Fairfax County Public Schools English curriculum lesson.

After backlash from military families who viewed the lesson as a baseless attack, the district backtracked and said the activity would be “revised.”

Fairfax County Public School District “recognizes and honors the experiences of all our families, including those in service to our country in the military,” a district spokeswoman told The Federalist. “We have revised this activity. We apologize for any offense it may have unintentionally caused.”

Hundreds of military family members commute to the Pentagon from Fairfax County, which is just 20 minutes away from the military hub. Annual salaries for teachers in the school district range from $51,000 to $119,117, depending on experience level. The starting yearly salary for an enlisted member of the military is $20,340, while starting pay for a commissioned officer is just $41,724.

1642834285274.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Virginia Democrats Fight to Hide Sexually Explicit School Materials from Parents
122Chinnapong/Getty Images
1642835238279.png

Virginia Democrats are fighting not only to keep sexually explicit materials in public schools but also to kill a bill that would require school boards to notify parents of sexually explicit materials being introduced.

Maintaining the ideology behind former Democrat Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s campaign-ending gaffe saying, “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach,” Virginia Senate President Louise Lucas (D) said, “when it comes to what’s in the curriculum, that should be left to the school boards and to the boards of education. And if a parent wants to opt out, I think they should have the right to do that.”

The bill before the Virginia General Assembly would provide an avenue for “parental involvement” and a “reasonable opportunity for public comment” on printed and audiovisual materials available in school libraries, “mandatory prior written parental consent” before a student can check out such material, and “the removal from the school library of any such printed or audiovisual materials that could be considered grooming video or materials.”

While Lucas has promised a Senate “brick firewall” for Republican legislation, Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) said, “I want to give parents the right to be informed before their child is exposed to sexually explicit materials,” asking the legislature to send him a similar bill passed in 2017 for his signature.

1642835316287.png

As Breitbart News reported, some explicit materials making their way into school libraries include depictions of pornography and pedophilia.

Virginia’s Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) removed the book Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe for “sexually explicit” content two months after its neighbor, Fairfax County (FCPS), reintroduced the pornographic and pedophilic book to schools.

While FCPS maintains that the book “neither depicts nor describes pedophilia,” the depiction of pedophilic acts appears clear with a graphic illustration of Plato’s Symposium, an important philosophical work but also a manuscript well known for its account of pedophilia in Ancient Greece, in which a bearded man is fondling the genitals of a boy.

LCPS decided to keep another similarly controversial book, Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison, which also “contains graphic descriptions of sex between men and children.” FCPS also kept this book on its shelves.

Parents Defending Education (PDE) Vice President of Strategy and Investigations Asra Nomani described a scene from Lawn Boy:
“What if I told you I touched another guy’s dick? What if I told you I sucked it? I was 10 years old but it’s true. I sucked Doug Goebbels’ dick, the real estate guy, and he sucked mine too.” The “real estate guy” was an adult man.
Democrats in Richmond, however, appear steadfast in their defense of these books and their denial of the ability for parents to review the material before being shown to their children.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Social Justice Slams Into Europe, Part 2: In Scotland, They'll Take the Woke Road

SATURDAY, JAN 22, 2022 - 07:00 AM
Authored by Richard Bernstein, submitted by RealClearInvestigations,

Read Part 1 here...
The online class on gender, feminism, and the law was underway when Lisa Keogh, a 29-year-old student and mother of two, introduced a note of unwoke contention into the discussion.

“We were talking about equal rights for women, and I said I don't believe a trans woman is really a woman,” said Keogh, then attending Abertay University Law School here. “I said that my definition of a woman is someone with a vagina.” Keogh, disagreeing with another point of view expressed in the same meeting, also voiced the apparently retrograde opinion that not all men are rapists.


Lisa Keogh, law student who endured investigation: “I said that my definition of a woman is someone with a vagina.”


In response, some students accused Keogh of “making offensive comments and behaving in a disrespectful manner during class discussion.” Abertay undertook a formal investigation, claiming, as a university spokesman told the media, that the school was “legally obliged to investigate all complaints.”

After two months and two sessions before the investigating committee, Keogh was exonerated.

Still, her supporters say her ordeal took its toll — and sent a chilling message to other students about the risk of expressing opinions that contradict the tenets of the campus radical left.

“The process is the punishment,” Stuart Waiton, a sociology and criminology lecturer at Abertay, told me over lunch in Dundee. Keogh has filed suit against the university for the stress, anxiety, and the loss of sleep while also claiming the process has hurt her chances of getting a job.

“I'm quite a controversial figure,” Keogh said. “Somebody in a law firm told me, 'We can't even be seen publicly agreeing with what you said.’ A friend told me, 'There's no point in you even looking for work in Dundee.'” Instead, Keogh said, she's considering going elsewhere in Scotland where, she hopes, her notoriety won't follow her.

Scotland illustrates how American-style “wokeness,” complete with its identity-politics, victim-culture assumptions and lexicon, has seeped across the Atlantic to Europe. While the U.S. media has given broad coverage to the rise of far-right anti-immigrant parties in countries like France, Germany, Hungary and Poland, it has paid less attention to the emergence of a mirror-image phenomenon on the left, which demands an orthodoxy of opinion and punishes dissenting ideas, like those expressed by Keogh.

But wokeness is a hot topic in Europe. As in Scotland, its flare-ups and the arguments about it take place mostly in elite circles, the universities, and the press. It usually surfaces in incidents, sometimes so small and geographically scattered as to seem isolated and unimportant.

Nevertheless, they have a cumulative effect. They show the contagious, globalized power of a rising leftist ideology whose adherents are convinced of their own assumptions – chiefly the supposedly pervasive evils of white-dominated societies, the vulnerability of minority groups disadvantaged by the structures of oppressive power, and on the need to protect those groups from insult and slight, even unintended. And taxpayers are underwriting it.

Earlier this year, the European Commission, the main administrative body of the 27-member European Union, created a Gender Equality Strategy aimed at “eliminating the inequalities between the sexes and the socio-economic intersectionality of inequality throughout research and innovation.” The effort is to be funded by a program called Horizon Europe with a budget of more than $100 billion for 2021-2027. “Sexual equality and openness to the question of inclusion are our priorities,” a Horizon mission statement says.

To further that mission, Horizon Europe requires that any governmental or private entity applying for a grant present as part of the application a “Gender Equality Plan” that, among other things, shows the hiring of “equality officers” to help “tackle unconscious gender bias among staff, leaders and decision makers.”

“Don't think that woke ideology is a delirium limited to certain American universities,” the right-of-center French magazine Causeur wrote of these requirements, noting the deployment of a vocabulary that seems to come straight from the gender and sexuality studies departments of U.S. academe. In Europe, the magazine continued, these assumptions are based on an “imaginary sexism, ideological submission, and coercion in the academic world.”

Each country seems to have its woke eruptions, and in many places they have prompted spirited counterreactions. In Germany over the course of this year, some 600 people, mostly university professors, have become members of a Scientific Freedom Network, the stated purpose of which is “to help victims of cancel culture” — that phrase “cancel culture” having entered the German vocabulary in its original English form.

“More and more academics feel they are restricted in the research questions they can address without feeling any fear of being professionally sidelined,” Sandra Kostner, a specialist on migration at the Schwãbisch Gmünd University of Education who founded the group earlier this year, told me in a Zoom conversation. “I wrote an article two years ago expressing the idea that something is going wrong at German universities,” she continued. “Within a day or so I got about 800 emails agreeing with me, but in many cases, the last sentence was 'This is just between the two of us.' There were university presidents and vice presidents saying, 'Please don't tell anybody what I've told you.'”

Some of the incidents cited by members of the new group seem almost trivial when taken individually, but reflect a widespread and growing trend. For instance, a report on the Freedom Network describes an incident in Cologne when a professor asked a dark-skinned student and German citizen where she was from. The student took the question as an insult, stemming from “institutional racism,” and complained about it both to the local government and on social media, where she got 50,000 responses.

Commenting on the incident, Kostner pointed out that up until a decade or so ago, teachers were encouraged “to ask the questions about one's origins because it was a sign of politeness, signaling interest.” But now, under the pressure of the new victim-culture ideology, such questions are seen “as a denial of belonging, even as a sign of racism.” Behind this shift, the report on the incident noted, is the view of the West as first and foremost having “a history of colonialism, racism, misogyny, and white domination,” all of which has, until the new awakening came along, been “obscured by Eurocentrism and patriarchal rule.”

A 2021 survey of a thousand academics carried out by the Allensbach Institute, a leading German social research organization, found that 40% of respondents feel restricted by formal or informal political correctness rules, mostly due to gender guidelines. This compares to 32% two years ago. More than half of respondents in the arts and social sciences said they feel restricted in the topics they can research, compared to 35% two years ago.

“Only representatives of certain groups are allowed to talk about certain topics,” the German journalist Thomas Thiel wrote in the daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, “and the value of a statement is based on the origin of a speaker, not on the plausibility of the argument.”

As the complaint about Lisa Keogh and the subsequent investigation shows, no corner of Europe is immune from these kinds of incidents, seemingly isolated and yet illustrating the spread and influence of a rising victim-culture ideology. Earlier this year in Edinburgh, the government-funded James Gillespie High School made national headlines when it dropped the American classics “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “Of Mice and Men” from its reading lists, saying that “Mockingbird” was flawed because of its “white savior” theme (a white lawyer defends a falsely accused black man) and that John Steinbeck’s novel was flawed because none of the main characters were people of color.

British newspapers quoted Allan Crosbie, the English Department head at James Gillespie, telling a school meeting, “Those novels are dated and problematical in terms of decolonizing the curriculum.” Replacing the books removed from reading lists, Crosbie said, would be “The Hate U Give” by the American writer Angie Thomas, which tells the story of an unarmed black teenager shot dead by a white policeman. (An email sent to James Gillespie High School asking for an interview went unanswered.)

St. Stephen’s University, one of the oldest and most prestigious in the United Kingdom, now requires matriculating students to pass a test in “sustainability, diversity, consent, and good academic practice.” The test asks, for example, whether a student agrees or disagrees with the statement, “Acknowledging your personal guilt is a useful starting point in overcoming unconscious bias.”

The embrace of such ideas might seem strange in a nation like Scotland with its homogeneous population — 96% white; only 4% African, Caribbean, Asian, or mixed — and its Scottish Enlightenment heritage. The stomping ground of classical “Great Books” figures like David Hume and Adam Smith wouldn't seem to present fertile ground for critical race theory or Black Lives Matter. In contrast with the U.S. – or European countries with long colonial pasts such as France, Belgium, Spain and the United Kingdom — Scotland has no history of domestic slavery and very little of the kind of racial tensions or racial obsessions that are central to American history.

Yet Scottish “wokeness” exemplifies the broad appeal of a globalized demand that the West in general engage in an apologetic self-examination, one predicated on the idea of some previously unacknowledged fault lying at the heart of Western civilization, and only at the heart of Western civilization. “Nothing is more Western,” the French essayist and novelist Pascal Bruckner has written on this phenomenon, “than hatred of the West.”

The spread of “woke” ideas in this sense also demonstrates a negative power of the American example and its globalization. America, in this view, being the most powerful Western country, is therefore the one with the gravest intrinsic fault. “When Black Lives Matter happened in America, it was almost as if the incident that incited it happened here, Stuart Waiton, the Abertay lecturer, told me. “It wasn't a British policeman who killed a black man. The killing didn't happen here. And yet, everyone became a participant in BLM. People formed racial awareness groups. There were massive demonstrations. If it's happening in America, it will probably happen in Scotland as well.”


Pyramid themes: types of racism according to a government body advising Scotland's public schools


Part 1 of 2
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 2 of 2

Consider Education Scotland, a governmental entity that provides advice to the country's centralized public school system and has in recent times created and promoted a program aimed at “decolonizing the curriculum” through “anti-racist education.” A booklet titled “Promoting and Developing Race Equality and Anti-Racism Education” describes “race” as “a concept that tried to justify exploitation, domination, and violence against people who were deemed non-white” and “made it easier for Britain to downplay the brutality of slavery and colonization.”

But if there's mention of British colonialism as a kind of original sin, the program is certainly heavily influenced by similar “diversity and inclusion” programs formulated in the United States.

Another booklet posted on the Education Scotland website, titled “Anti-Racist Praxis,” is written by Titilayo Farukuoye, who, according to the booklet's introduction, “aspires to dismantle oppressive structures and to transcend race and gender constructs.” It lays out a full anti-racist program, with, for example, instructions to teachers on how to handle “white fragility.”

“Teachers will,” the booklet says:
  • Define white fragility
  • Identify white fragility
  • Practice overcoming white fragility
  • Practice how to centre the person who has experienced harm.
But perhaps the greatest acrimony arising out of a “woke” ideology, illustrated by the case of Lisa Keogh, has another powerful American echo. It has to do with trans rights, and the battle over gender definition, much of it spurred by leglislation being considered by the Scottish parliament that would reform the UK's Gender Recognition Act of 2004, which enabled people throughout Great Britain to legally change their gender. The reform would make the process much easier, essentially by what's called “self-identification,” enabling people to change their gender without the need for a medical diagnosis.

Worried that men could simply declare themselves to be women and thereby gain access to such women's spaces as girls’ sports teams, bathrooms, and shelters, some people, including some leading Scottish feminists, either outright opposed the change or at least urged a discussion of it. The reaction from the transgender lobby has been swift and harsh.

An example is an ongoing incident that started three years ago when Ann Henderson, only the second woman in 170 years to be elected rector of the University of Edinburgh, another of Scotland's renowned institutions of higher learning, retweeted a message from a feminist group that opposes the move to allow people to identify their own gender. Harassment for what she called “repeated, unfounded accusations” continued for her entire three-year term; it was led by student groups, against which, Henderson says, she got very little support from the university.


Ann Henderson, university rector: Harassed for years for retweeting a message from a feminist group that opposes Scotland's move to allow people to identify their own gender.


The acrimony over trans rights has a political dimension in Scotland, where the majority group in the Scottish parliament, the Scottish National Party, has avidly supported the proposed reform, to the point of excluding party members who expressed doubts. The most widely known such case involves Joan McAlpine, a former member of the parliament with impeccable feminist credentials. But because of her dissenting ideas about trans self-identification, McAlpine was placed so far down on the SNP's election list that she was effectively removed from office.

Among her offenses was her opposition to adding a “non-binary” option to the British census form, on the grounds that it would weaken protections for women. Earlier this year, she was uninvited from a meeting on climate change because, as the organizers of the meeting put it, “We do not believe her views on transgender rights align with our views on equality.”

“It's been incredibly toxic,” Mandy Rhodes, the editor of Holyrood, a biweekly publication focused on Scottish politics, told me at a meeting in her office in Edinburgh. “I've been a campaigning journalist my whole career, over three decades, always focused on equality and social justice issues, but I find myself in the ridiculous position of being accused of being anti-trans and siding with the right-wing press when all I've really done is understand that human rights can conflict with each other and we always need to question and explore the consequences, however unintended, of that."

Recently, a senior police officer in Scotland caused a stir when he said that the police could record a suspected rapist as a woman in cases involving “a person born male but who identifies as female and does not have a gender recognition certificate.”

“This would potentially mean that a woman who has been raped would have to address her alleged assailant as ‘she,’” Rhodes said. “In Scots law, rape can only be committed by someone with a penis, and so the absurdity and potential harms to women victims of sexual assault have been exposed by this line of discussion, where proponents of self-identification for trans people basically have to defend the rights of rapists against the rights of women who have been raped.”

Some critics of Scottish wokeness in general identify it as part of a broad cultural shift toward what they call a therapeutic society, as opposed to a society of individual agency, with a strong emphasis on the idea that vulnerable groups need state protection. A couple of years ago, the courts required the government to scrap a planned program by which every child in Scotland under 18 years of age would be assigned a “named person” who would have responsibility for that child's welfare, which its critics construed as an effort to take authority out of the hands of parents and give it to the government.

“More and more we feel like we're living in a one-party regime ruled over by a bunch of managers and where what's been decided is now in process and you have to comply with it,” Penny Lewis, a lecturer in the Department of Architecture and Urban Planning at the University of Dundee, told me. “It's not people in jackboots marching down the street,” she continued.

“It's all wrapped up in this ideology of caring.”

According to Lewis and others who share her views, the Scottish government, led by the SNP, sees itself as a kind of world leader in bringing about a kind of therapeutic state. “The SNP barely existed before the referendum on independence,” she said, referring to the 2014 vote that defeated a move for Scottish independence from Great Britain. “A lot of them actually have very limited political experience, so it's easier for them to take these supposedly virtuous ideas off the shelf, than it is to figure out what to do in a country that's got serious problems.”

“The new authoritarianism isn't about authorities imposing their will, but protecting supposedly vulnerable groups,” Waiton said. And if there are no truly vulnerable groups desperately in need of state protection, it's necessary to invent them.

“We've moved from people as a social subject to people as the vulnerable subject,” Waiton said, “and if you think people are vulnerable, then they have to be protected.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Black Mississippi Democrats Walk Out of Senate over Bill to Prohibit Teaching Children Any Race Is Superior or Inferior
1
A woman holds up a sign during a rally against critical race theory (CRT) being taught in schools at the Loudoun County Government center in Leesburg, Virginia on June 12, 2021.
ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images
NICK GILBERTSON22 Jan 2022241

All 14 black Democrat senators walked out of the Mississippi Senate Chamber on Friday in protest before a vote on a bill that prohibits teaching children any race is superior or inferior to another.

Senate Bill 2113 passed by a margin of 32-2 after the walk out of the black caucus, which Daily Mail reports was entirely comprised of Democrats. The two senators who voted against the legislation were David Blount and Hob Bryan – both of whom are white Democrats, according to WLBT. The bill will now make its way to the state’s House.

The proposed legislation states in part:

(1) No public institution of higher learning, community/junior college, school district or public school, including public charter schools, shall direct or otherwise compel students to personally affirm, adopt or adhere to any of the following tenants:

(a) That any sex, race, ethnicity, religion or national origin is inherently superior or inferior; or
(b) That individuals should be adversely treated on the basis of their sex, race, ethnicity, religion or national origin.

Prior to the walkout, Senate Minority Leader Derrick Simmons (D) questioned Sen. Michael McLendon (R), who introduced the bill. McLendon submitted he had not heard of an instance where Critical Race Theory was being taught in Mississippi but noted a large number of his constituents expressed concerns “over the teachings that they have heard from around the country.”

“Well, we try to make laws for the future as well as today,” McLendon said towards the beginning of the exchange.

Simmons questioned McLendon about what the bill would mean for teachings of race and racism in schools going forward should it be signed into law.

Watch Below:

View: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2100123263475421&ref=external
2:56 min

A transcript of the exchange reads in part:

Simmons: Should we teach race and racism in our schools accurately?

McLendon: I believe we’re doing that and this bill is not changing anything about our past. All this bill says – no child should be told that they’re superior or inferior to another. That’s all this bill does.

Simmons: So all the history in the state of Mississippi all the way up to the changing of the state flag – all of that can still be taught in our schools with the passage of this bill?

McLendon: Yes sir.

Simmons: And how we got to the point we got to in 2020 when we changed the flag – we can also teach the true history about that in our schools if this bill becomes law?

McLendon: That is my intent, yes sir. All this bill does is no child is superior or inferior to another and we should not teach that – that someone is.

Simmons: The horrific thing that happened to Mamie Till’s son – can we teach that in our schools with the passage of this bill?

McLendon: Absolutely, I watched the movie last night as a matter of fact.

Later in the session, Simmons requested a roll call before leading a walkout of black senators, according to WLBT.

“We felt like it was a bill that was not deserving of our vote,” said Simmons, according to Mississippi Today. “We have so many issues in the state that need to be addressed. We did not need to spend time on this.

“We walked out as a means to show a visible protest to these proceedings,” said Democrat Sen. John Horhn.

Simmons released a statement that reads in part:

Senate Democrats have always led the charge on teacher pay raises and have championed establishment of fair career plans that show our appreciation for the job our teachers do.

However, the roll call vote today to pass Senate Bill 2444 – our teacher pay plan – was quickly called up and passed without discussion immediately after members of our caucus walked out in protest of a vague bill that would ban “critical race theory” in Mississippi’s public schools and universities without creating boundaries. We felt it was unfair to have such a bill introduced or passed as it really demeans a large segment of our population. Though our votes were not counted because of the chain of events, Senate Democrats stand in support of raises for our educators.

“I’m trying to find the mischief in this bill and I don’t see it,” said Republican Sen. Chris McDaniel.

“He argued that if the bill was introduced in the 1950s, it would have been the ‘most dynamic piece of civil rights legislation in this state’s history,'” WLBT reports.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Mike Gonzalez, senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation, in Washington on Sep. 22, 2020. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)
Mike Gonzalez, senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation, in Washington on Sep. 22, 2020. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

Marxist Revolution in the Making in America, Expert Warns

By Ella Kietlinska and Joshua Philipp
January 21, 2022 Updated: January 21, 2022

There is a phenomenon being observed in America today, “an attempt at changing reality” to foster a new Marxist revolution, said Mike Gonzalez, an author of two books on this topic.

According to Marxist thought, “reality is just put together by our conceptual framework,“ Gonzalez told EpochTV’s “Crossroads” program.

“So what we see with Black Lives Matter, what we see with the 1619 Project … is to replace the American narrative, to replace the idea of America from: all men are created equal, we’re all free … with this idea that we’re an awful country, that our history is hideous, that our system is racist itself—that the system must be changed.”

Most people believe that reality cannot be changed because they believe in an ultimate and fundamental truth, in natural law, or in God, but Marxists do not believe in any of that, Gonzalez said.

Black Lives Matter (BLM) used the death of George Floyd as an excuse to change society, Gonzalez explained, “to dismantle the organizing principle of society”—in the words of BLM co-founder Alicia Garza.

Play Video (on website) 1:00:28 min

Gonzalez said that the concept of Black Lives Matter is “unimpeachable.”

“Seven billion people on earth matter. And we’re all children of God. But I think it’s important—given our history—to affirm that the lives of our black co-citizens, compatriots, matter because we know the history.”

But Black Lives Matter is also the movement and the organization BLM Global Network Foundation (BLMGNF), said Gonzalez, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

Epoch Times Photo

Patrisse Cullors, a co-founder of Black Lives Matter, speaks in Los Angeles, Calif., in a file photograph. (Rich Fury/Getty Images for Teen Vogue)

The BLM founders say that they were trained Marxists, the expert noted.

Patrisse Cullors, a BLM co-founder said in an interview with Real News Network in 2015, “We actually do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia [Garza] in particular are trained organizers. We are trained Marxists.”

“Cullors trained for a decade as a radical organizer in the Labor/Community Strategy Center, established and run by Eric Mann, a former member of the Weather Underground, the 1960s radical faction identified by the FBI as a domestic terrorist group,” Gonzalez wrote for the Heritage Foundation.

The group, originally called “Weathermen,” explained in its 1969 foundational statement that they were dedicated to “the destruction of U.S. imperialism and the achievement of a classless world: world communism.”

Alicia Garza, a co-founder of BLM, was trained by the School of Unity and Liberation (SOUL), an institution founded by Harmony Goldberg, Ph. D., a scholar in cultural anthropology, Gonzalez said.

Goldberg is also an expert on Antonio Gramsci (pdf), the founder of Italy’s communist party in the 1920s and a Marxist intellectual. She understands Gramsci’s theory of the war of position, the concept of recruiting people, organizing them, training them, and convincing them to replace one culture with another culture, Gonzalez said.

Gonzalez cited the words of Gramsci, who said that in the West, in societies with strong civic society, you need to have a war of position.

Gramsci likened political “warfare” to military warfare, where the war of position is akin “to trench warfare, settling in for a long-term struggle with strategic smaller victories to gain more territory bit by bit,” as opposed to the warfare of movement which is like “a rapid military attack,” Bradley Thomas, a libertarian activist, and writer wrote for the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE).

“In other words, you have to take the worker, infiltrate them, indoctrinate them, teach them that the family was a form of oppression, teach them that the nation-state was a form of oppression, teaching that private property led to war and more oppression. And that is what we have today, except here in America, we practice it through the lens of the race with critical race theory,” Gonzales said.

The core of Marx’s thought is that the family, the nation-state, private property, as well as the beliefs in God and religion, had to be abolished, Gonzalez said, adding that the workers at that time didn’t agree with any of that.

From the mid-19th century all the way till 1917 when the first Marxist revolution succeeded, the workers during these 70 or so years liked the nation-state, were patriotic, loyal to God, and really liked private property, Gonzalez continued.

Therefore, the Marxist revolution failed miserably in Central and Western Europe—exactly the place where Marx had said that it would succeed, Gonzalez explained.

“These communist thinkers in Italy and Germany came up with the idea that Marx had been right on the strategy on getting rid of the nation, state, and private property but his tactic needed to be upgraded.”

“Marx’s tactic was that it was going to be the material forces of society, economics was going to determine everything,” but these communist intellectuals in the 1920s in Europe realized that it was culture—not economy—which accounts for how man behaves, Gonzalez said. “The Marxism we see in America today—it’s that type of Marxism.”

“The communists who trained the founders of BLM organizations … took their cues from these cultural Marxists of the 1920s from Europe.”

BLM’s Impact
Epoch Times Photo

Protesters rally on the steps of the State House during a Black Lives Matter rally in Providence, R.I., on June 5, 2020. (Joseph Prezioso/AFP via Getty Images)

At a gathering of Maine progressives in 2019, Garza said: “America itself was founded on violence, steeped in white supremacy and predicated on theft and genocide.

“When we talk about fighting white nationalism, fighting white supremacy, we’re not talking about fighting white people. We’re talking about changing how we’ve organized this country so that we actually can achieve the justice that we are fighting for. I believe we all have work to do to keep dismantling the organizing principle of this society, which creates inequities for everyone, even white people,” Garza said according to Maine Beacon.

“In 2020, we had months of de-stabilization. And … with critical race theory, there’s been a real attempt at changing our culture from within,” Gonzalez said.

According to the U.S. Crisis Monitor, in 2020 after the death of George Floyd, 633 riots took place, Gonzalez said. The Insurance Information Institute said that these riots were the costliest civil unrest in U.S. history with insured losses estimated at over $2 billion.

portland protest

A Black Lives Matter protester is seen at a riot in Portland, Oregon, on Aug. 1, 2020. (Noah Berger/AP Photo)

BLM activists were involved in 95 percent of the 633 riots for which the identity of the perpetrators was known, according to Gonzalez.

“I take that seriously. … That’s why I wrote my book: BLM: The Making of a New Marxist Revolution,” Gonzalez said.

The Epoch Times reached out to Black Lives Matter for comment.

The results of the riots have been felt until today, the expert noted.

“The jump in the murder rate in 2020 was astronomical. It was 30 percent,” Gonzalez said. “It was the highest increase in the homicide rate in history,” he added. “We know from statistics that over 50 percent of people murdered are African Americans.

“So this is a lot of additional black lives that were lost. Don’t they matter?” Gonzalez asked rhetorically.

BLM had a plan when it carried out protests and riots in 2020, Gonzalez continued.

The organization proposed federal legislation in July 2020 called the BREATHE Act. The bill, sponsored by Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D- Mich.) and Ayanna Pressley (D- Mass.), called for defunding the police and replacing them with a new approach to community safety. Cullors, the BLM Executive Director described this approach as a “new, non-punitive, and non-carceral approaches to community safety that would incentivize states to shrink their criminal-legal systems and center the protection of Black lives,” according to a BLM report.

BLM also partnered with the musical Hamilton and Sprite soda brand to increase the voter turnout in the 2020 election, the report said. The organization has been spreading its curriculum that promotes critical race theory in the country’s 14,000 school districts, Gonzalez wrote in his book.

The organization has millions in financial resources obtained through fundraising. “Across our entities and partners, we have raised just over $90 million in one year, 2020” with the average donation of $30.64, the BLM report said, while their expenses such as staffing, operating and administrative expenses, civic engagement, programs, and field expenses, rapid response, and crisis intervention, and its “get out the vote” campaign amounted to $8.4 million.

BLM sent out 127 million emails related to their activities in 2020 which resulted in 1.2 million actions taken, according to its report.

In addition to the book about BLM, Gonzalez also wrote earlier the book, “The Plot to Change America: How Identity Politics Is Dividing the Land of the Free.”

The author explained why he penned these books that expose the Marxist infiltration in America.

“The fact that I spent the first 12 years of my life in a communist country in Cuba has made me recognize them right away. … I know how culture was destroyed. I know how a country was destroyed. America is my country. I don’t want to see happen to America [what has happened] to the country of my birth.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Denver Elementary School Teaching Kids to ‘Disrupt the Nuclear Family’ and Support BLM

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published January 23, 2022 at 9:47am
00-120.jpg

group of school kids and teacher in classroom

Centennial Elementary School in Colorado is teaching children to “disrupt the nuclear family” and support the Black Lives Matter movement.

The teachings were outlined in an instruction guide for kindergarten and first graders on the “Black Lives Matter Guiding Principles” for their Black Lives Matter Week. The shocking document was obtained by the organization Parents Defending Education.

1642997342529.png

The Denver Gazette reports, “among the listed principles was ‘globalism,’ which the school described as ‘our ability to see how we are impacted or privileged within the global black family.’ Also listed were ‘transgender affirming,’ ‘Black families,’ which was defined as ‘a space that is family friendly and free from patriarchal practices,’ and ‘Black Villages,’ which is ‘the disruption of western nuclear family dynamics and a return to the ‘collective village’ that takes care of each other.'”

1-854.jpg


“The school also included an FAQ on BLM, which cited the U.S. government as a source that ‘supporting BLM is not political’ and said the school’s goal in promoting the movement was ‘not to teach children what to think; rather to expose them to different perspectives and opinions so that they learn to value and respect diversity,'” the report continued.

The FAQ:
1-855.jpg


The school previously made waves when they advertised a “Families of Color Playground Night,” segregating families by race.

Erika Sanzi, the outreach director for Parents Defending Education, told the Washington Examiner that the school’s BLM instruction guide was “indoctrination at any age,” adding that it “borders on abuse with students this young.”

“It is preposterous and wholly inappropriate to teach 5- and 6-year-olds that they must commit to being trans affirming and queer affirming and in favor of disrupting the nuclear family,” Sanzi said. “If a parent wants to raise these subjects at home, that is one thing, but in a classroom, it is nothing more than social engineering and a theft of childhood by the state.”
 

Lone_Hawk

Resident Spook

US Army Guerrilla Warfare Exercise To Target "Freedom Fighters"

THURSDAY, JAN 20, 2022 - 12:15 PM
Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

The US Army is set to conduct a “guerrilla warfare exercise” later this month in North Carolina where troops will battle against “freedom fighters.”


Yes, really.

The two week “unconventional warfare exercise” will take from from Jan. 22-Feb. 4 on privately owned land in a remote location which remains unknown.



Information about the exercise was provided to the media in a bid to avoid civilians confusing the drills with actual terrorist attacks or warfare, which has happened before.

As Chris Menahan notes, a similar Robin Sage exercise in 2019 showed resistance fighters displaying a flag that says “liberty.”

The exercise will do little to dampen concerns that the Biden administration is launching a de facto ‘domestic war on terror’ targeting patriots and Trump supporters.

Following the January 6 Capitol riot, Democrats ludicrously compared the events to September 11 in an attempt to justify using federal resources that would normally be focused on actual terrorists against American conservatives.

Earlier this month, the Justice Department created a new “specialized unit focused on domestic terrorism” in response to an “elevated” threat from violent extremists in the United States.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1480932275504226313
2:34 min


However, polls show that Americans are split on who represents the biggest threat, particularly after the Waukesha attack, its subsequent cover up, in addition to the fact that left-wing extremists spent much of 2020 rioting and burning down American cities.

A recent Schoen Cooperman Research survey found that voters are split on domestic extremism, with 23 per cent naming left-wing extremism and 21 per cent naming right-wing extremism as the greater concern.

Following the January 6 incident, Army General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he wanted to understand “white rage,” although an interest in understanding “black rage” after a sustained period of violent mayhem caused by Black Lives Matter protesters wasn’t seemingly of any importance.

View: https://youtu.be/0TxlJOd3Wxs
11:55 min

Robin Sage is a regular graduation exercise here in North Carolina for Army Special Forces. Not a big deal....

But I will say that those soldiers will learn a lot that will be helpful to us soon enough...
 

bracketquant

Veteran Member

US Army Guerrilla Warfare Exercise To Target "Freedom Fighters"

THURSDAY, JAN 20, 2022 - 12:15 PM
Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

The US Army is set to conduct a “guerrilla warfare exercise” later this month in North Carolina where troops will battle against “freedom fighters.”


Yes, really.

The two week “unconventional warfare exercise” will take from from Jan. 22-Feb. 4 on privately owned land in a remote location which remains unknown.



Information about the exercise was provided to the media in a bid to avoid civilians confusing the drills with actual terrorist attacks or warfare, which has happened before.

As Chris Menahan notes, a similar Robin Sage exercise in 2019 showed resistance fighters displaying a flag that says “liberty.”

The exercise will do little to dampen concerns that the Biden administration is launching a de facto ‘domestic war on terror’ targeting patriots and Trump supporters.

Following the January 6 Capitol riot, Democrats ludicrously compared the events to September 11 in an attempt to justify using federal resources that would normally be focused on actual terrorists against American conservatives.

Earlier this month, the Justice Department created a new “specialized unit focused on domestic terrorism” in response to an “elevated” threat from violent extremists in the United States.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1480932275504226313
2:34 min


However, polls show that Americans are split on who represents the biggest threat, particularly after the Waukesha attack, its subsequent cover up, in addition to the fact that left-wing extremists spent much of 2020 rioting and burning down American cities.

A recent Schoen Cooperman Research survey found that voters are split on domestic extremism, with 23 per cent naming left-wing extremism and 21 per cent naming right-wing extremism as the greater concern.

Following the January 6 incident, Army General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he wanted to understand “white rage,” although an interest in understanding “black rage” after a sustained period of violent mayhem caused by Black Lives Matter protesters wasn’t seemingly of any importance.

View: https://youtu.be/0TxlJOd3Wxs
11:55 min

If the troops themselves are freedom fighters, but clueless, will they just follow orders if told to stand in a circle and start firing?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

California School District Faces Legal Action Over LGBTQ+ Activist Teachers

SUNDAY, JAN 23, 2022 - 04:10 PM
Authored by Brad Jones via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A mother of a student has taken legal action against a school district in Salinas, Calif., over policies she claims allowed two teachers at Buena Vista Middle School to secretly brainwash her teenage daughter into identifying as bisexual, and later as transgender.

A school in Tustin, Calif., on March 10, 2021. (John Fredricks/The Epoch Times)


Jessica Konen blasted members of the Spreckels Union School District (SUSD) at a board meeting in mid-December, claiming the teachers, who ran a LGBTQ+ club during lunch-hour, “coached” her then sixth-grade daughter to change her gender identity and use a masculine name and pronouns at school.

Her daughter has since switched schools, returned to using her feminine birth name and gender, and seems to be happier, according to her mother—and no longer showing signs of gender dysphoria.

Harmeet Dhillon, CEO of the Center for American Liberty, which is representing Konen and her daughter, told The Epoch Times on Jan. 19 the case is important to protect parental rights.

“It’s terrible what happened to this family,” Dhillon said.

“Supreme Court precedent has made clear that parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and education of their children, and their right is denied to them when schools keep secrets from parents, especially on matters as foundational as a child’s identity, name [and] pronouns,” she said.

“That’s what happened to our clients. This is a violation of the clients’ civil rights—the parent and the child. Every parent has a right to know what’s going on at school.”

Dhillon accused SUSD and Buena Vista Middle School of adopting a “parental secrecy policy,” to keep parents in the dark about certain information regarding students’ gender expression and identity.

The case, Konen v. Spreckels Union School District, was filed on Jan. 19.

In California, filing a claim under the Government Claims Act is a precursor to filing a lawsuit, so the state has a couple of months to respond to the claim “and either resolve it, or if they don’t then we can proceed with lawsuits,” Dhillon said.


Attorney Harmeet Dhillon, former vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party, speaks at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio on July 19, 2016. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)


The claim alleges the policy adopted by SUSD “authorizes minor children to make mature, consequential, and potentially life-altering decisions—such as what gender to identify as, what name to be called, what pronouns to use, and what privacy facilities to use—with no notification to or input from parents.”

Teachers Lori Caldeira, Kelly Baraki and the school’s principal, Katelyn Pagaran, are named in the claim. As a minor, Konen’s daughter is referred to only as “A.G.”

“Sometimes, Ms. Caldiera and Ms. Baraki would introduce and push LGBT+ identities on students that the students resisted” and “planted the seed in A.G.’s mind that she was bisexual,” the claim states. “That idea did not originate with A.G. In fact, she did not fully understand what that term meant.”

“We suspect that what happened to Jessica and her family is just the tip of the iceberg,” Dhillon said. “We believe that there is a lot of this going on and this is something that parents should really be concerned about.”

Konen told The Epoch Times about her experience after a leaked audio recording of the teachers at a California Teachers Association (CTA) conference revealed Caldeira and Baraki encouraging other teachers to hide the nature of Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) clubs from parents.

The CTA’s 2021 LGBTQ+ Issues Conference, “Beyond the Binary: Identity & Imagining Possibilities,” was held in Palm Springs, Calif., from Oct. 29 to Oct. 31. There, Caldeira and Baraki led a workshop called “How we run a ‘GSA’ in Conservative Communities,” at which they described the obstacles they faced in concealing the activities of LGBTQ+ clubs from parents.

At Buena Vista, the GSA club—the “Equality Club”—was renamed the “You Be You” or “UBU” club, one teacher said in the audio clip obtained by The Epoch Times.

The teachers also suggested that parents who refuse to call their child by pronouns of the child’s choosing should be arrested and charged with child abuse, according to a source who attended the conference.

In the audio clip, the teachers talk about spying on students’ online searches and activity as well as eavesdropping on their conversations to identify and recruit sixth-grade students into these LGBTQ clubs whose membership rolls are kept hidden from parents.

We totally stalked what they were doing on Google,” one of the teachers said.
The teachers have since been suspended with pay pending the outcome of third-party investigation, according to a recent statement from SUSD.

A previous statement from Superintendent Eric Tarallo, SUSD Board President Steve McDougall, and Buena Vista Middle School Principal Kate Pagaran said the teachers were using personal leave to lead the workshop at the CTA conference and that they weren’t officially presenting on behalf of the school district.

“Many of the comments and themes stated in the article are alarming, concerning, disappointing, and do not in any way reflect the District or the Board of Education’s policies and practices,” the Nov. 19 statement reads.

However, the CTA and the California Department of Education have issued guidance to teachers about how to talk to students about sexual orientation and gender identity issues without their parents knowing about it, Dhillon said. “That’s the official policy of our California government.”

A file photo of a high school in El Segundo, Calif., on Oct. 29, 2020. (John Fredricks/The Epoch Times)


But California is not the only state that has trampled on parental rights. It’s happened in many other states, she said. “You have governors, and other public officials saying that parents don’t have a right to control their children’s education.”

“I, as a taxpayer, certainly do not sign up for my tax dollars being used to indoctrinate otherwise healthy children with fears and questions about their identity, and certainly parents don’t sign up for that either. And so, we are standing right next to those moms, and all parents,” Dhillon said.

Celeste Fiehler, deputy director of ParentUnion.org, urged more parents to come forward and expose the actions teachers’ unions have taken to subvert parents.

“Parents have been gaslighted,” Fiehler told The Epoch Times.

Fiehler applauded Konen for having the courage to fight for her daughter and rights as a parent.

“I’m extremely proud of Jessica and all parents who are speaking up while risking everything to protect children,” she said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Critical Race Promoters Are More Odious Than Marxists
They are a parasitic class of haters who only pretend to be supporting revolutionary change.

By Paul Gottfried
ag-mark_90833ec2.svg

January 23, 2022

Of late, Fox News has been hosting a series called “The MisEducation of America” featuring gatherings of critical race theory’s critics—such as Carol Swain of Vanderbilt University—focusing on the danger of teaching racially divisive versions of American history. According to Swain, a black professor of political science at Vanderbilt, forcing kids to do things like play games called “privilege bingo” are “a prime example of how CRT, has seeped down to K-12 education, and it disturbs students.” Further: “All of these critical theories with Marxist roots are destroying American education, and parents have to save their children. But they also have to work to save other people’s children.”

Although the media and our universities may choose to ignore Swain’s complaint, she is actually understating the problem she and “MisEducation” host Pete Hegseth are featuring. I’m not sure I see “the Marxist roots” of the crusade against white people and their history in quite the same way Swain and Hegseth see it. We are indeed witnessing class warfare but not of the kind that Marx foresaw. It is a war being waged by white elites against the “basket of deplorables,” the predominantly white, working-class, and small-town Americans whom these elites hate and want to divest of human dignity. Similar conflicts are going on simultaneously in other Western countries, featuring equivalent social conflict.

In none of these cases do we find Marx’s appeals to the proletariat to rise up against those who control the means of production. In fact, we are witnessing exactly the opposite. An alliance of corporate capitalists, feminists, the LGBT lobby, and black race hustlers are directing their fire on the working class, which seems to be the least affected by the hegemonic ideology of wokeness. If anything, we are now looking at what Pedro Gonzalez has characterized as “the counterrevolution of the ruling class.” If Marxist theory, which supposedly is “seeping in” has any application, it would be as an analysis of how our elites are suppressing those they are stepping on and trying through increasingly vicious hate speech to isolate.

The ruling class, which avails itself of the full rhetorical arsenal of the historical Left, happily pulls out archaic Marxist phrases to justify its actions. Thus, the transgendered or black racialists emerge rhetorically transfigured as Marx’s revolutionary class, but it is not hard to figure out what is going on here. The leftist counterrevolutionaries are not appealing to an oppressed working class but precisely to its enemies, those who hate ordinary working-class Americans because of their whiteness and the traditional social values they are thought to embody.

The last term I would use to describe listeners of National Public Radio or regular diners at the Harvard Faculty Club is Marxist revolutionaries. They are a parasitic class of haters who pretend to be supporting revolutionary change. They have all the iconoclastic freshness of the geriatric Soviet rulers before their downfall, speaking of an almost equally obnoxious group that also claimed to be promoting revolution.

I would also take issue with many of the comments I have heard from the host and guests of “The MisEducation of America.” The promoters and teachers of critical race theory are not just dividing classmates over race or distorting the intentions of America’s founders. They are stirring up racial hate, which the Democratic National Committee, the mainstream media and our (mis) educators have been politically exploiting for decades.

It’s a lot worse than just making students in the same schoolroom distrust one another. Those doing the inciting seem to loathe those they are attacking and often vent against them with intense fury. Ron Dreher has offered for our assessment a YouTube video produced by Tom Curry, a white professor of CRT at Texas A & M. In this shocking video, Curry tells us whites are racially uneducable and then suggests that many of them may have to be eliminated. Brittney Cooper, an associate professor of gender and sexuality studies at Rutgers University, put the matter succinctly in a reference to white people during a critical race forum on October 28: “We’ve got to take the motherf—kers out.”

Statements calling for human extermination come easily to the woke Left’s lips or iPhone. In 2018, former New York Times writer Sarah Jeong tweeted “Cancel White People.” Expressing this unkind sentiment not only did nothing to short-circuit her hiring at the Times, Vox editor Ezra Klein rushed to Jeong’s defense and explained that her form of expression was appropriate for describing the “dominant power structure and culture.” (Jeong left the Times after about a year.)

Presumably when Hitler expressed comparable loathing for Jews, he too was just characterizing a “power structure.”

I doubt that the haters whom I have quoted are really intent on killing all white people. They are certainly not interested in wiping out the ones in gated communities, least of all those who flaunt Black Lives Matter signs and whose offspring attend Ivy League institutions. It’s the other whites they would like to destroy.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Proposes ‘Parental Bill of Rights’

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published January 24, 2022 at 10:45am
Greg-Abbott-600x401.jpg

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has proposed a “Parental Bill of Rights” to protect families from the increasingly partisan education system.


The bill says that it will “amend the Texas Constitution to make clear that parents are the primary decision-makers in all matters involving their children.”

Abbott announced his effort during a re-election campaign stop at a charter school in Lewisville last week.

“Abbott said the plan would expand parents’ access to school curriculum, make materials easily accessible online or other means, and reassure parents their concerns about school curriculum and policies are heard,” ABC 13 reports.

The legislation would also protect students from obscene material being provided to them in school. Educators who violate this policy will be barred from teaching in the state.

“Texas will ensure that any educational personnel who was convicted of providing minors with obscene content will lose their educational credentials and state licensing, forfeit their retirement benefits and be placed on a ‘do not hire list,” he said.

Additionally, parents will have a say in whether or not their children are held back.

“Texas will give parents the option to decide if their child should repeat a course or grade level instead of leaving that decision solely to the school district,” Abbott said.

1643067928519.png

“Texas parents have every right to know what their children are being taught,” Abbott said.

The bill has, naturally, outraged the left.

Shannon Holmes, executive director of The Association of Texas Professional Educators issued a statement saying “The so-called ‘Parental Bill of Rights’ wouldn’t give Texas parents any new rights. Every ‘issue’ is already addressed in existing state law and local policies. Instead, Gov. Abbott’s pledge to ‘bolster’ parent rights would only serve to place additional governmental mandates on school districts and teachers already stretched to their limits due to staffing shortages.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Case That Could End Use Of Race In College Admissions

MONDAY, JAN 24, 2022 - 10:00 AM
Following a handful of landmark cases brought by the DoJ accusing colleges of unfairly disadvantaging Asian and White applicants, the Supreme Court has just decided to hear arguments that could result in it radically breaking with precedent to ban the consideration of race in college applications.

The AP reported that SCOTUS had agreed to hear the challenge to the status quo, which could result in the biggest change to the legal framework surrounding college admissions - seen as a key gateway to the meritocratic American dream - since 2003, when Grutter v. Bollinger reasserted that universities may take race into account to create a "racially diverse" student body, to the benefit of all students. But the precedents go back decades, all the way to the 1964 Civil Rights Act.



The court has chosen to hear an appeal from Students for Fair Admissions, an activist group working to end bias against Asian applicants at top universities, It has also opted to hear appeals from Harvard and other prestigious universities urging that the precedent be upheld.
“Grutter is wrong, immoral, and unpersuasive, and has not aged well,” argued the group, Students for Fair Admissions, run by longtime preferences opponent Edward Blum.
Unfortunately for Students for Fair Admissions, the Biden Administration is taking the other side, with the administration's lawyers filing appeals alongside Harvard and its coterie of elite schools.

In her landmark opinion for the majority, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, a Republican appointed by President Ronald Reagan, predicted that racial preferences would no longer be necessary in 25 years. However, Harvard insists that these methods are still absolutely necessary.
“Universities across the country have followed this precedent in structuring their admissions processes,” Harvard argued. “And the American public has looked to this precedent for assurance that the nation recognizes and values the benefits of diversity and that the path to leadership is open to all.”
Many lower courts have rejected SFA's challenge, including the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the Harvard policy in a 2-0 ruling. The case will turn on the Court's interpretation - or reinterpretation - of the 1964 Civil Rights Act’s Title VI, which bars racial discrimination by universities that receive federal funding.

The case will likely be heard during the Court session beginning in October.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

AZ Republican Senate Candidate Blake Masters: You Have To Be Able To Say "Critical Race Theory Is Anti-White Racism"

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date January 23, 2022

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1485031271914823680
.58 min

Republican Arizona Senate candidate Blake Masters told the Sun City Republican Club that he has decided to take the next step from the conservative talking point that "critical race theory" is racist and flatly say that it is "anti-white."

"If it is racist, it is racist against somebody," Masters said. "It is bad for white kids, obviously. But it is bad for black kids and Latino kids, it is bad for every kid to hear that toxic crap."

"And when it takes root, you see what you're seeing today: medical rationing based on race."
BLAKE MASTERS: Until that point, you were allowed to say critical race theory is racist and that's bad. But to say it is "anti-white" racism -- if it's racist it is racist against somebody.

And it was a risk, I remember some of my consultants didn't want me to do it, but I went on Tucker [Carlson's FOX News show] said I can navigate issues like this.

I think it is important to have people who are going to be bold and take the arrows and talk about some difficult subjects in our country.

So I said critical race theory is anti-white racism. I went on to explain that it is bad for white kids, obviously. But it is bad for black kids and Latino kids, it is bad for every kid to hear that toxic crap.

And when it takes root, you see what you're seeing today: medical rationing based on race.

If you're a white person, it doesn't matter if you are more sick, you're not going to get this therapeutic because we have a limited supply and it should go to a person of color who is historic[ally disadvantaged]. If you do that too much, even if you let that take root at all, pretty soon you don't have a real country anymore.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Bipartisan AGs Suing Google, Alleging ‘Deceptive Practices,’ Tracking Users Without Consent
RTM Staff
by RTM Staff
January 25, 2022

Bipartisan AGs Suing Google, Alleging ‘Deceptive Practices,’ Tracking Users Without Consent


A bipartisan group of states’ Attorneys General is suing Google, alleging that the Big Tech giant used deceptive practices to continually track its users’ location.

The Attorneys General of Washington State, Indiana, Texas, and Washington, D.C. have each filed suits in their respective federal courts, alleging that Google violated various consumer protection laws in those states.

The D.C. lawsuit stems from a 2018 report by The Associated Press which found that “many Google services on Android devices and iPhones store your location data even if you’ve used a privacy setting that says it will prevent Google from doing so.” AP reported at the time that Google Maps users can disable the “Location History” feature, which records places the user has been. However, “[e]ven with Location History paused, some Google apps automatically store time-stamped location data without asking.” The AP further reported:
For example, Google stores a snapshot of where you are when you merely open its Maps app. Automatic daily weather updates on Android phones pinpoint roughly where you are. And some searches that have nothing to do with location, like “chocolate chip cookies,” or “kids science kits,” pinpoint your precise latitude and longitude — accurate to the square foot — and save it to your Google account.

The privacy issue affects some two billion users of devices that run Google’s Android operating software and hundreds of millions of worldwide iPhone users who rely on Google for maps or search.

The D.C. Attorney General’s Office opened an investigation into Google based on the AP report, finding that since as early as 2014, “Google has systematically deceived consumers about how their locations are tracked and used and has misled consumers to believe that they can control what information Google collects about them.” Attorney General Ken Racine announced he was suing Google on Monday for violations of the District’s Consumer Protection Procedures Act, which protects against deceptive trade practices. The suit alleges that Google:
  • Makes it nearly impossible for users to opt out of having their location tracked, using hidden functions in Google’s apps, as well as Bluetooth and Wi-Fi scans, the user’s IP address, or other means.
  • Deceives users about their ability to protect their privacy through their account settings
  • Misleads Android device users about their ability to protect their privacy through their device settings
  • Relying on “dark patterns,” such as repeated nudging, pressure tactics, and deceptive descriptions of features and settings, to undermine users’ choice to disable location tracking
“Google falsely led consumers to believe that changing their account and device settings would allow customers to protect their privacy and control what personal data the company could access,” Racine said in a statement. “The truth is that contrary to Google’s representations it continues to systematically surveil customers and profit from customer data. Google’s bold misrepresentations are a clear violation of consumers’ privacy. I’m proud to lead this bipartisan group of attorneys general that will hold Google accountable for its deception. Through this lawsuit, we will hold Google accountable, and in the process, educate consumers on how their personal data—particularly sensitive data about their physical location—is collected, stored, and monetized. This result of our collective action is that consumers, not Google, will determine how their data is or is not used.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a similar lawsuit Monday, arguing that Google’s practices violate the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

“Google’s founding motto is ‘Don’t Be Evil.’ And yet it systematically lies to millions of consumers in order to stack billions of dollars into its coffers,” Paxton said. “Big Tech companies like Google continue to erode the American way of life and often break the law to maintain their overwhelming dominant market position… This is not only an unethical invasion of privacy—it’s against the law.”

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita and Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson also filed lawsuits Monday. “Google has prioritized profits over people,” Rokita said. “It has prioritized financial earnings over following the law. We Hoosiers are the first to salute business success, but we also expect companies to be honest and obey the rules.”

“Location data is deeply personal for consumers,” Ferguson said of his state’s lawsuit. “This information reveals the most significant details of our lives. Google denied consumers the ability to choose whether Google could track their sensitive location data to make a profit. Google kept tracking individuals’ location data even after consumers told the corporation to stop. This is not only dishonest — it’s unlawful.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

U.S. Postal Service delivery trucks at the Manassas Post Office in Virginia in a 2011 file photograph. (Karen Bleier/AFP via Getty Images)
U.S. Postal Service delivery trucks at the Manassas Post Office in Virginia in a 2011 file photograph. (Karen Bleier/AFP via Getty Images)

Post Office’s Law Enforcement Arm Is Expanding Its Surveillance Powers

By Ken Silva
January 24, 2022 Updated: January 25, 2022

The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) has announced plans to provide its law enforcement branch with access to its vast trove of customer data, raising concerns among privacy activists about the organization’s expanding surveillance powers.

The USPS came under scrutiny in 2021 when it was revealed that its law enforcement arm, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), was monitoring both left- and right-wing protest groups on social media. Multiple nonprofit organizations sued the USPS, seeking internal records about its surveillance program and questioning the legality of such activities.

Those lawsuits haven’t stopped the Postal Service from seeking additional surveillance powers. On Dec. 17, 2021, the USPS announced that it intended to provide customer data to USPIS investigators.

“USPIS will collect and aggregate eight data elements—Name, Address, 11-Digit Delivery Point ZIP Code (ZIP 11), Phone Number, Email Address, Tracking Number, IP Address, and Moniker,” the Postal Service stated.

According to the USPS, the influx of new data will allow postal inspectors to conduct “link analysis,” using data analytics to discover patterns and trends in criminal activity.

But privacy activists have brought up concerns.

The Electronic Information Privacy Center (EPIC) filed comments with the USPS on Jan. 18, urging the Postal Service to put the brakes on its plans.

“By demanding access to more postal data, the Postal Inspection Service is exposing USPS customers to wrongful surveillance and a greater threat of data breach,” EPIC stated. “The Postal Service and the Postal Inspection Service should separate their information collection procedures and ensure that USPS customers do not come under greater surveillance simply by using a government mail carrier.”

EPIC stated that the USPIS is in danger of mission creep—when an agency has access to more tools or information than it needs to complete its designed mission, leading it to expand into another role outside of the designated mission to utilize those tools.

“The Postal Inspection Service has a well-defined mission in protecting the mail, but the agency has often overstepped its bounds,” EPIC stated. “The Postal Inspection Service now claims a ‘wide jurisdiction’ to preserve the ‘safety, security, and integrity of the nation’s mail system from criminal misuse.’”

Such mission creep has occurred before, according to EPIC, which cited the postal service’s surveillance of the LGBTQ community in the 1950s and ’60s—when the USPIS investigated the delivery of homosexual publications under laws that were intended to restrict the mailing of obscene materials.

EPIC also reiterated its criticism of the postal service’s Internet Covert Operations Program (iCOP), which was outed in 2021 by Yahoo News for surveilling protest movements.

“The availability of those tools facilitated monitoring protesters and organizers engaging in protected First Amendment activities,” EPIC stated regarding iCOP. “The Postal Inspection Service should be wary of onboarding new tools and new data sources given the agency’s troubled history with mission creep.”

EPIC’s comments to the USPS may be too little too late. The postal service’s Dec. 17, 2021, notification stated that its new data-sharing initiative was to begin on Jan. 18.

The USPS didn’t respond to questions about whether it has already begun transferring customer data to the USPIS or if it’s considering EPIC’s comment before moving forward.

EPIC is still pursuing its lawsuit against the USPIS for running iCOP without conducting a privacy impact assessment—a review of what information is collected, why it’s being collected, how the information is used, and how the data is stored.

The most recent filing from that case is Jan. 14, when the USPIS argued that EPIC’s case should be tossed out.

“EPIC lacks standing to bring this case, because it identifies no concrete interest belonging to it or its members that was harmed by Defendants’ alleged procedural failures,” the filing reads. “EPIC has no statutory right to the information it seeks, and it makes no allegation that the iCOP program harmed it or its members in any way, aside from its alleged failure to comply with the E-Government Act’s procedures.”

No hearings are scheduled in this case.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BIG BROTHER UPDATE: IRS Will Start Using Facial Recognition and Require Selfies to Pay Your Taxes Online

By Joe Hoft
Published January 26, 2022 at 6:30pm
bigbrother-409x600.jpg


Privacy continues to be under attack as Big Brother US government turns to facial recognition and plans to require selfies in order for Americans to file their tax returns online.

Yahoo reports that the IRS will soon be requiring Americans to share selfies with the entity in order to file their tax returns online.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is going to require users of its online tax payment services to create an identification account, which will involve sending off a selfie for facial recognition.

Security blogger Brian Krebs was the first to spot a message on the IRS website directing users to create an account with a company called ID.me.

“If you have an existing IRD username, please create a new ID.me account as soon as possible. We’re bringing you an improved sign-in experience. You won’t be able to log in with your existing IRS username and password starting in summer 2022,” the message read.
Creating an ID.me account involves submitting various pieces of official documentation, as well as taking a live video selfie.
An IRS spokesperson confirmed to Gizmodo that users will need an ID.me account to make and view payments, and access their tax records.
The Department of the Treasury did not immediately respond when contacted by Insider.
Big Brother has now morphed from Big Tech billionaires to the US government.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The New Educational Rage: Identify Your Privilege Bingo
cdc-gsRi9cWCIB0-unsplash-930x620.jpg


Have you heard about the latest in educational pedagogy: Identify Your Privilege Bingo.

Who needs math, or English, or History in preparing young men and women for the challenges facing us as individuals and as a country?

No, what we need is another exercise of identity politics to drive home the point of just how unfair – sorry, didn’t use the proper “buzz” word here – how inequitable life is in this most unjust of countries that rewards the privileged while oppressing mercilessly those without privilege.

But what makes for privilege? That’s the really interesting question, and one that will identify the motives of those who use this kind of garbage to push their political agenda.

On the Bingo card there are 25 boxes possibly to be checked. With the middle box being “Free,” and thus there are 24 categories of privilege to be identified in this “educational” exercise.

One of the boxes is “male,” so right off the bat half the population escapes the privileged mark of Cain. But why do women get a pass? I know many women who have led extraordinarily privileged lives compared to some working-class males with whom I grew up.

But in the educational view of these social justice charlatans, maleness is always, and without exception, a sign of oppressive tendencies.

Just as an experiment I decided to play a little Identify Your Privilege Bingo, remembering who I was when I was in public school. Here are the results.

Native English Speaker: Yep, I am one of those. Of course, I went to college in an Appalachian community where those living there might have been using English, but it was sometimes difficult to be sure. You haven’t lived until you’ve heard Shakespeare done via Appalachian speak: But, sowft, wut liite thru yonder winder brakes? And since when have so-called hillbillies been considered a step up on the privilege ladder?

Comfortable Walking Outside Alone: I did. As a kid I would often walk the streets late into the nights and early mornings. I would walk without direction, just thinking my solitary night thoughts of loneliness. I often described myself as the only 12-year-old existentialist stalking the midnight streets of Kensington, MD. Privileged? I didn’t think so. But according to Bingo….

Heterosexual: Yep, count me in. But does that make me privileged? According to the Bingo Baristas serving up value judgments on the lives of others I am. But what kind of privilege is it to be judged bad because of who I am and have been since birth?

College is the Expectation: No privilege for me here. Growing up in a very blue-collar, wrong-side-of-the-tracks neighborhood, none in my family had ever gone to college and there certainly was no expectation that I would. My oldest brother never got past 8th grade.

Have Your Own Bedroom: Not sure if I qualify here. I had a bedroom with my two older brothers until they finally moved out, and thus it was only in high school that I had a bedroom to myself. Does that count as privilege? I’d say not.

Though I did appreciate it on those nights when Astrid up the road came to visit.

Both Parents Went to College: Not even close. No privilege for me here.

White: Okay, in addition to the “male” category, this seems to be the big “catch-all.” Yes, I am white, as are 61.27 per cent of other Americans. Out of that huge swath of people it is painting with too broad a brush to say they all are privileged to the detriment of others. And with Affirmative Action, who is privileged now? As an academic, I became used to seeing what in effect were “No whites need apply” ads for new faculty.

Christian: If I am playing the game as my public school student self, then no, I am not a Christian and therefore have no privilege from that. Later, as an adult, I became a Christian after a Kierkegaardian conversion experience. But as far as gaining privilege because I grew up as a Christian? Nope. Didn’t happen.

Never Been Racially Profiled: This one is almost silly. Yes, I have been racially profiled. Today, given the times in which we live, one cannot help but be racially profiled. The whole point of this ridiculous Identify Your Privilege Bingo game is to racially profile me as a bad person who, because of my privilege, brings pain and suffering to others. Then there’s this, playing pick-up basketball games someone would always want to guard me, the short, pudgy white kid. But I played basketball for my college. I had my way with them.

Involved in Extracurricular Activities: Yes, I played sports during my public school career, sang in the choir, and participated in school dramatic and musical productions. But so did nearly all of us participate in one activity or another.

Again, painting with too broad a brush to create privileged oppressors.

Never Worried About Food: This is a tough one for me. No, I never worried about food. Truth be told, I didn’t know how limiting my food choices were.

Being the youngest of three sons of a working single mom, she would put together either hamburgers or hot dogs when she got home, along with French fries and lots and lots of beans. I never went hungry, but looking back our cuisine options can hardly be considered a sign of privilege.

Parents are Married: This one, too, leaves me a little perplexed. The assumption seems to be that one has two parents while growing up. Fact is, my dad died when I was four years old. My first living memory is of him dying. Circumstances determined that we be raised by a single working mom. So yes, my parents were married. But privileged? I don’t think so.

Feel Represented in Media: This is another ambiguous one. I guess what they are going for is that if you’re a white guy, you are seeing white guys on TV shows. So yeah, in that sense I am privileged. But as far as representing the kinds of experiences and problems I have had and the terrible loneliness of not having a father? I’m sorry, Leave it to Beaver and Ozzie and Harriet simply didn’t cut it.

Cisgender: Another catch-all. But get this, of all the “oppressed” who allegedly suffer at the hands of the privileged I dare say the vast, overwhelming majority of them are also cisgender. So where’s the privilege? This one is part and parcel of the “heterosexual” category.

Drive/Get Driven to School: Nope, had to walk to school my entire life. We were poor in the relatively rich Montgomery County, MD. We didn’t have a car. If we wanted to go food shopping we had to walk the two miles to the store and two miles back. No privilege for me here.

Born in Country of Residence: In a 2019 Migration Policy Institute study, it is reported that 86.3 percent of the U.S. population were born in the United States.

So, again, this category paints with too broad a brush in seeking to label people with the pejorative of being privileged. And just like the “cisgender” and “heterosexual” categories, the vast majority of those deemed “oppressed” by the woke are themselves born in the country of their residence. So whence “privilege”?

Feel Safe Around Police Officers: This one in particular is tied to the times. The assumption, of course, is that minorities do not feel comfortable around cops.

But when you dig, it is white liberals who spread this message and demand a defunding of the police, while minority communities in urban settings say no, please bring more police into our neighborhoods. But yes, I feel comfortable around police officers. There was a time when I wanted to be one. So count me privileged.

Able-Bodied: When I was younger, yes, I was an able-bodied youth. Today, of course, I have a prosthetic leg, a big scar on my chest from open-heart surgery, some false teeth, hearing loss, and my dick just hangs there. But my mind is still quick and sound. Am I privileged? You decide. But, if we are playing this game as I was in public school, then yes, I guess I was privileged.

Never Lost a Loved One: Absolutely not. As mentioned before, I lost my dad to a heart attack back in 1952. He’d had rheumatic fever, which led to the family moving to Dallas, TX, so he could have the benefit of a warm, dry climate. There were no open-heart surgeries or transplants in those days. He lived less than a year in Dallas. No privilege for me. Also, I had two high school buddies who died in Vietnam.

Employed: Yep, been employed since I was 16 delivering the Washington Post to morning porches before school and then working as a busboy after school at a restaurant. When I wasn’t in school, I worked. Now, I am a retired college professor of Philosophy and Religion. Do I just sit around in retirement? Nope. I work part-time Security at a local casino because I enjoy talking to folks and they pay me besides. Is having to work as a youth to be Privileged?

No speech Impediment: This one, too, paints with too broad a brush. Most everyone is privileged by this criterion. So, what’s the point. It’s tragic when one has a physical limitation like a speech impediment, but justice does not demand we ignore its implications in the real world. For a demonstration, just note the “other” defense lawyer in My Cousin Vinny.

Mentally Healthy: This seems another ambiguous one to me. One person’s mentally healthy is another’s completely bonkers. But my physician wife tells me it simply refers to not being crippled by depression or other mental malady. So in that sense, I guess I am privileged. Though seeing how the Kansas City/Buffalo game ended with its overtime rules has sent me into a near deep depression.

Military Kid: Nope. No privilege for me here. Though I have to wonder, just what is it about being a military brat that makes for a privileged upbringing? All I can think of is that those who approvingly use this Bingo game simply don’t like the military and are willing to slander them with this little exercise of judgmentalism.

Male: There it is, along with being white, that which makes the world, and more particularly America, such a terrible place to be if you are among the oppressed, which is an ever-growing crowd of the victimized. At least, that is the simple-minded vision of the educators who think this “game” is a good exercise to stimulate growth and understanding in our youth.

Pishtosh!

So how did I do? Out of the 24 possible indicators of privilege, according to our educational superiors, I checked the box on 14 of them. Does that make me privileged?

It reminds me of what in Philosophical Logic is known as the “Argument of the Beard,” which asks: How many hairs does it take to make a beard. If someone answers 500, the next question becomes: But how about 499? That’s only one hair’s difference. Why can’t that be a beard? If you allow it, then why not 498, and on and on.

So how many boxes need to be checked to lead a fully privileged life? This will lead to what is known as a “philosophical dispute,” where an abstract notion, like, for example, being a Communist, can be identified by a number of beliefs and actions.

If one then asks if Robert Oppenheimer was a Communist, one can look at his beliefs and his actions and measure them against the abstract model of a Communist. If he embodied some, but not all, how many must there be to, in fact, call him a Communist? And therein the dispute.

Same here. The Woke crowd has an abstract notion of what it is to be privileged, and thus a bane to those who lack privilege and who suffer oppression at the hands of the privileged. This Bingo game names some beliefs and actions that, to their mind, make for privilege. So how many must be checked to claim someone is beyond the pale of social justice acceptance.

Clearly, the makers of this game want – desperately want – those playing this little game to see themselves as unfairly privileged. It must warm the cockles of their hearts to point their sanctimonious fingers at all those who “fail” this little game of identity politics. They are worse than Brylcreem on a snail.

Well, regardless of how many boxes I checked, I am here to say that life is more nuanced and complicated than is allowed in this little game.

In fact, life has placed some significant hurdles in my path growing up and ultimately becoming what I’d like to think of as a responsible and sensitive adult spouse, parent, and worker. I have never seen myself as particularly privileged.

I do see myself as having worked hard, living a life of delayed gratification, being as honest as I am able, honoring the lives and work of others, and being a good citizen in my community. What the Woke crowd identifies as privilege I see as blessings. Have I been blessed? You betcha. But many of those blessings have come through discipline and hard labor. And I make no apologies for that.

And it is criminal that these social justice ideologues who pass as educators are using this Identify Your Privilege Bingo game to undermine the mental state and ethics of a school-age generation greatly in need of the sorts of skills that math, English and history lessons from a good, solid education can provide.

Damn those who would rob children in this way.
By Ron Nutter
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

HORRIBLE: Democrats’ ‘China Bill’ Includes Millions of Dollars Going to Organizations to Push Racist Policies in the US that Have Nothing to Do with China

By Joe Hoft
Published January 28, 2022 at 9:43am
Pelosi-China.jpg

(pic from johnsnewplace.wordpress.com)


Democrats think that pushing racist policies in the US is how to address the US’s trade deficit with China and China’s theft of US intellectual property.'

President Trump had China on the ropes. We wrote about it numerous times. China’s economy was failing, companies were leaving China at a record pace, and finally, someone was addressing China’s policies of stealing US intellectual property.
But the Democrats have other ideas. Every move Biden has made to date has benefitted China. From giving Afghanistan to the China-backed Taliban to not holding China accountable for the release of COVID on the world, Biden is China’s greatest asset.

But now the Democrats think they know how to address communist China’s actions and policies demanding world domination. The sad part is that Senate Republicans signed on to a bill that they all think will help the US in dealing with China.

This bill then went to the House and the Democrats filled it up with garbage additions related to giving millions to racist causes. The Daily Caller writes:
The America COMPETES Act, introduced by House Democrats late Tuesday, is a companion to a bipartisan bill that passed the Senate in June 2021, though the House version lacks Republican support. The bill is designed to increase domestic technological advancement and innovation in order to make the U.S. more competitive with China, and includes $45 billion to ease supply chain disruptions and $52 billion for domestic semiconductor fabrication.

The legislation also contains several provisions establishing and funding diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

The bill sets aside $2 million a year for a Department of Energy (DOE) program intended to “increase the number and the diversity, equity, and inclusion of highly skilled science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionals working in Department of Energy mission-relevant disciplines.” The secretary of Energy must also submit a plan to Congress for “broadening participation of underrepresented groups.”

In addition, the legislation includes a provision establishing a grant-making program through the National Science Foundation (NSF) dubbed the “NSF INCLUDES Initiative” that funds higher education efforts to broaden “participation in STEM studies and careers of groups historically underrepresented in such studies and careers.”

The bill appropriates $8 million each year from 2022 to 2026 to fund another NSF grant-making initiative providing funding for universities and colleges to increase diversity among their faculty and recruit “underrepresented minority groups in academic STEM careers.” A similar provision sets aside $15 million a year to increase diversity among undergraduates in STEM fields.
This list goes on and on.

This is absolutely disgusting. Why Republicans would sign onto any bill with the Democrats who just stole an election is mind-blowing.

This bill that pays for racist policies in the US is just another example of how Democrats push anti-American policies and how Republicans foolishly fall into their trap, every time.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

ACLU legend Ira Glasser speaks out… What happened to free speech…
Posted by Kane on January 29, 2022 8:54 pm

View: https://youtu.be/x0Lc5b8Flto
6:53 min
Interesting conversation with Bill Maher last night

Former ACLU Director Ira Glasser criticizes the organization for no longer supporting free speech
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXCLUSIVE: Georgia School District Published Plans To Teach Critical Race Theory, Then Hid Them

BY: SPENCER LINDQUIST
JANUARY 28, 2022

students in class

IMAGE CREDITCREATIVECOMMONS

Documents obtained by Heritage Action revealed that Gwinnett County Public Schools, the largest public school district in the state of Georgia, admitted plans to teach both critical race theorist and Marxist thought to students enrolled in an AP Language and AP Research Combination Class.

In an audit syllabus obtained by Heritage Action, the school district remarked that “Students will bridge the skills from AP Language to AP Research, analyzing the value of using different lenses in social criticism (Critical Race Theory, Feminist, Marxist, Psychoanalytic) to aid their analysis across issues, and the class will discuss how these perspectives apply to the different methods used by research fields.”

The syllabus, which was originally found by Heritage Action here on Monday, was subsequently removed from the district’s website on Thursday but can still be viewed here.

In a statement to The Federalist, Heritage Action’s Executive Director Jessica Anderson decried the district, saying “This is a clear admission of guilt from Gwinnett County Public Schools, the largest public school district in the state of Georgia. This week, Heritage Action staff uncovered an audit syllabus hosted on the GCPS website clearly stating teachers intended to teach AP Language students to analyze texts through the lens of critical race theory — soon after, the document was scrubbed from the site.”

“Heritage Action is now submitting an open records request for all public documents and emails relating to why the syllabus was removed from the website and all documents containing the phrase ‘Critical Race Theory,'” Anderson added.

Gwinnett County Public School’s apparent attempt to hide their left-wing agenda from public view comes after State Rep. Brad Thomas introduced a bill that would ban critical race theory in public schools.

Anderson explained her support for the bill, saying “This is exactly why State Rep. Brad Thomas’ bill is needed: HB 888 would require curriculum transparency, a commonsense tool that gives parents the ability to oversee their children’s education, and prevent state-sanctioned discrimination. The tenets of critical race theory, which divide students and Georgians on the basis of race, have no place in the classrooms of Georgia’s public schools.”

Tarece Johnson, the chairwoman of the Gwinnett County Public Schools Board of Education, has publicly endorsed CRT and openly displayed her hatred of white children. In one Facebook post, Johnson remarked that “there’s a killer cop sitting in every school where White children learn.”

This revelation is by no means the first time schools have attempted to conceal their vitriolic political agenda from parents and the community. The Federalist recently revealed that a private school in Dallas had lied to parents about teaching CRT. Other investigations from The Federalist found that school districts in both Riverside and Los Angeles blatantly lied about the presence of the anti-American theory in K-12 schools.

Gwinnett County Public Schools did not respond to a request for comment.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Wokeism Is A Cruel And Dangerous Cult

SUNDAY, JAN 30, 2022 - 10:30 PM
Authored by Victor Davis Hanson via AmGreatness.com,

Wokeism’s natural logic is to destroy the lives of people of both genders, of all races, and - if need be - of those of every age, all to leverage an otherwise unworkable ideological agenda...


Wokeism has been described by its critics as the omnipresent use of race—and to a lesser extent, gender—to replace meritocracy and thus ensure equality of result. What follows from implementing that ideology are reparatory actions to reward those of the present by atoning for the injustices done to others in the past.

Some see it as an update of 1960s cultural Marxism fads. Others scoff that it is just a return to 1980s-style political correctness.

Still more see it as the logical successor to 1990s-type race, class, and gender obsessions—albeit with a shriller and more dangerous Jacobin, Soviet, and Maoist twist. Wokeism’s hysteria also invites comparisons to the Salem witch trials and McCarthyism.

But few have described wokeism as the cruel creed that it is.

Wokeism’s natural logic is to destroy the lives of people of both genders, of all races, and—if need be—those of every age, all to leverage an otherwise unworkable ideological agenda. It is nihilist and destroys everything it touches. It tears apart foes and friends alike, whether by fueling media-driven hatred of Donald Trump or faux-deification of the disaster that is now Joe Biden.

Woke’s Victims
Defunding law enforcement and defaming police resulted in record numbers of murders in 12 U.S. cities. A wave of violent crime is even hitting America’s suburbs.

Without much fear of arrest, indictment, conviction, and incarceration, emboldened violent career criminals for the past year have robbed, assaulted, and killed the innocent with impunity.

The victims at the bus stop, the subway, or in the furniture store do not seem to warrant media or progressive attention, much less sympathy.

They are the ignored—the unnamed, and the forgotten collateral damage from the grand experiment of redefining crime as a social construct. The guilty are the elite academics, activists, and billionaires like George Soros who are untouched by what they birthed.

We have all seen videos of the vast expanse of flotsam and jetsam strewn by train thieves along the Union Pacific tracks in Los Angeles. Yet the Wild West mess is still more than just the concrete manifestations of Los Angeles County district attorney George Gascón’s unhinged efforts to excuse criminals from legal consequences.

The packages thrown along the ground by thugs and gangsters represent, among other things, lost COVID-19 test results of the ill. Presumably, they unknowingly are waiting still by the window for the delivery of results that never arrive. The package in the dirt was, perhaps, a key tractor part eagerly awaited, in vain, by the broke farmer in the Central Valley. The mess included the life-saving medicines shipped to the sick that disappeared.

And our elected leaders did what in response? Governor Gavin Newsom apologized for using the insensitive word “gangs” to describe those who plunder, loot, and trash railcars.

Always In Search of Targets
It is a cruel thing to indoctrinate children with the lie that they are innately guilty of oppression due to their skin color. One accurate definition of racism is collective ill-treatment of an individual due to his innate appearance—on the pretext that such bias is deserved, given the target is deemed mentally, spiritually, or morally inferior because of said traits. But that, in a nutshell, is the essence of critical race theory: the destruction of all human traits and unique characteristics, as demonized individuals are reduced to stereotyped, faceless members of a collective.

For over a half-century, female athletes have sought to achieve parity in society’s attitudes to sports. Title IX forced universities to ensure rough equality for both female and male sports.

But the woke effort to redefine transitioning biological males as identical to biological women will assuredly destroy the life work of thousands of pioneer athletes.

Ironically, the sexist woke movement has allowed men to take hormones and undergo surgery to become females—even as their immutable skeleton frames, muscularity, or organ characteristics ensure an unfair and asymmetrical contest.

The lives of thousands of young female athletes will likely be diminished. Each sprinter, every swimmer, and all female pole-vaulters will now inevitably at some future date have a rendezvous with career implosion—defined by losing to a transgendered female/biological male.

Records are being rewritten, the very nature of individual women’s sports changed, and soon there will no longer remain an idea of “women’s sports” at all.

The Forgotten Broken Eggs of the Woke Omelet
The green wokeists postulate that they are saving lives by radical efforts to restrict gas and oil production, to raise fuel prices. They want to force Americans to buy high-priced alternative sources of wind- and solar-generated power and battery-powered cars. But away from the faculty lounge, millions of Americans are colder and less mobile this winter, paying far more to heat their homes and to drive to work.

Most of the woke climate change activists rarely see the poor trying to empty their purses to scrounge combinations of cash and credit cards to leverage over $100 to fill their cars’ gas tanks. Tesla drivers might be the architects of last year’s war on carbon fuels. But real-life victims pay for their piety—those who have no such options to buy high-priced electric cars.

For the cosmopolitan woke, the border is many things: a mere xenophobic construct, a racist barrier, a nationalist tic.

But the thousands who live near the Mexican border see their homes and farms overrun with drug traffickers—and during a pandemic thousands of unvaccinated and possibly sick illegal aliens. They suffer firsthand from daily violence as all security disappears.

For the American poor, who rely on government health clinics and state entitlements, the influx of thousands of illegal aliens into their communities becomes a zero-sum game. The more noncitizens put demands on such already oversubscribed services, the fewer citizens there are who will have access to quality care.

The woke lecture that colleges and universities must now go beyond their former de facto racial quotas for admissions and hiring, already mostly based on proportional representation and disparate impact. But now a sort of reparations system emerges. It is what the Left itself used to call in derision “overrepresentation.”

Equity in our Orwellian world is not equality, but payback. Again, it is the idea of making the current generation pay for the supposed sins of the long dead of centuries past.

Aside from the destruction of merit by the substitution of racial criteria, millions from a discarded generation will have doors slammed on their careers—simply because of the color of their skin. And they will never forget that.

The woke do not even make the effort to admit that class matters as much as, or more than, race. By doing so, they doom millions of poor white and Asian students, who managed in poverty to achieve excellent grades and test scores, from being admitted to top-tier schools. Their actual achievement, despite their absence of wealthy, college-educated, or well-connected parents, means little.

Once a morally bankrupt society—for naïve, utopian, or ignoble reasons—begins to calibrate graduation ceremonies, dorm space, roommate selection, achievement, and grading standards based on race, then it not only will lose its standard of living, but it will deserve to. And it may have a future date with the violence of Rwanda, Iraq, or the Balkans.

Power, Not “Equity,” Is the Creed
In sum, wokeness is not about kindness, equality, fairness, or morality.

It is the power agenda of the elite of all races. For differing reasons, they rig the game in their own interests, without a care about who suffers.

Rich white people assume that they possess the money, the influence, the networking skills, and the connections to navigate around the very exclusionary rules they make for others. For them, there are seldom costs. But they win apparent psychological gain at feeling spiritually superior while driving a Range Rover.

They get high on the sense of power they wield to engineer the lives of millions deemed less important than they. And to the degree they feel guilty about their own monopoly of wealth and leisure, such transient superficial remorse is alleviated by abstract caring for the “other.”

If they can ensure that 50 percent of TV commercials highlight African Americans, then they worry little about the nation’s existential crisis of 800 blacks murdered in Chicago last year. And no such television execs have a clue—or likely a concern—about how to stop it.

The woke take out a medieval contract that all their material indulgences can be balanced by virtue-signaling caring for the less fortunate—although always at someone else’s expense.

Woke = Wealthy Careerists
And for the millions of the affluent, elite nonwhite? The resurgence of racial obsessions conveniently destroys the old idea of class, even though now it is the far more precise calibration of inequality.

For all the woke talk about “constructs” of gender, race is somehow alone exempted and declared innate, definable, and immutable. One’s appearance becomes the permanent victimized refuge—even of NBA multibillionaires and billionaire rappers alike.

A Ward Churchill or Elizabeth Warren can desperately seek to leverage a career in becoming Native American, apparently as if they were almost trapped in their own white bodies. Yet they can still not manage to construct such assumed identities in the manner of Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner.

If race is now the sole immutable barometer of who is a victim, who a victimizer, then LeBron James, Jay-Z, Kayne West, Chris Rock, Michelle Obama, and Oprah Winfrey are always to be among the eternally oppressed. The enormous influence, power, status, and wealth they wield never negates their victimhood, despite a nation three generations into affirmative action.

In the immoral calculus of woke, the poor white or Southeast Asian offspring of poorly paid high-school dropouts constitute “the privileged.” And a multimillionaire racist like the TV anchorwoman Joy Reid claims to be the perpetual victim, not the inner-city African American retiree who in 2021 has lost local police protection.

No wonder the woke elite and the affluent leftists fixate on race, given they are now the ruling class. Otherwise, their own privilege would be the obvious target of the once-beloved “Revolution.”

So, they fear that by their own prior left-wing standards, they too could end up on the wrong side of their moral Maginot Line. Wokeism’s obsessions with ferreting out “white privilege” are a way for rich people to head off (so to speak) the fate of Marie Antoinette.

Totalitarian Wokeism
A final note. We know wokeism is both contrary to human nature and antithetical to democracy and constitutional government.

Without public support, it has instead embraced an entire array of cruel, Soviet, and Maoist means to achieve its own self-interested ends. Woke talk about “racists” eerily emulates Soviet boilerplate about “counterrevolutionaries.”

Today’s wokeist spouts things that could come right out of the mouth of the novelist Boris Pasternak’s character Army Commissar Strelnikov, or Mao’s Little Red Book concerning “suppression of counterrevolutionaries.”

No wonder the woke, so-called “humanists” are the first to resort to Trotskyization and iconoclasm. They are masters of censoring, blacklisting, scapegoating, deplatforming, ritual humiliation, doxxing, cancel-culture, ostracism, and disbarring.

Wokeism’s logic is the eternal one of the bully Jacobin with his guillotine lists of the revolutionary unpure, the 19th-century lynch mob storming the frontier jail, the Red Guards hounding the counterrevolutionary, and the forced mental hospitalizations of the Soviet Union.

But above all, wokeism is a cruel cult—created by and for the careerist benefit of the privileged.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Cali Has a New Systemic Racist Law for Private Corporations
By
M Dowling
-
January 30, 2022

California communists have taken control of private corporations’ boards and brought racism and gender ideology to a whole new level with a new law – AB 979.

The new law, AB 979, forces the more than 600 publicly held corporations headquartered in the state to appoint board members based solely on their race and sexual orientation.

Choosing people by the color of their skin is racist. Maybe someone should explain to me why people have to also be chosen by who they sleep with. That’s just bizarre.

A law already in place, SB 826, requires corporations to meet a quota of female board members or face financial penalties. Existing law requires that by the end of 2019, a corporation with its principal executive office in the state had to have at least one female on its board. By the end of 2021, a corporation with 5 directors had to have a minimum of 2 female directors, and one with 6 or more directors had to have a least 3 female directors.

Now, as of this past December 31, the new law, AB 979, requires corporations to uphold an additional quota for board members based on race and sexual orientation, real or imagined [they can be nuts]. By the end of 2021, a corporation headquartered in the state was required to have at least one director from “an underrepresented community.” By the end of 2022, such a corporation with 5 to 8 directors had to have at least 2 directors from underserved communities; a corporation with 9 or more directors had to have a minimum of 3 directors from those communities on its board.

It doesn’t require the “director from an underrepresented community” to actually belong to that community.

“Director from an underrepresented community” is defined as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

A first violation is punishable by a fine of $100,000; for subsequent violations, the fine is $300,000.

California’s radical communist Dem governor, Gavin Newsom, said it advances “racial justice.”

“When we talk about racial justice, we talk about empowerment, we talk about power, we need to talk about seats at the table,” Newsom said, according to the Los Angeles Times.

This is illogical, stupid, immoral, and unconstitutional. It is wholly unAmerican. It’s racist and gender idiocy.

According to Newsom, this ends systemic racism but it actually guarantees systemic racism. It makes everything about race and sex instead of allowing companies to choose the most qualified people.

A conservative group is suing.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Michigan Democratic Party deletes social post claiming parents aren’t ‘client of the public school’

Facebook post ignited a hailstorm of criticism as the debate over parental rights continues to rage across America.

By The Center Square Staff

By Bruce Walker
Updated: January 17, 2022 - 5:00pm

A weekend Facebook post by the Michigan Democratic Party ignited a hailstorm of criticism, prompting the party to eventually delete the comment Monday.

“Not sure where this ‘parents-should-control-what-is-taught-in-schools-because-they-are-our-kids’ is originating, but parents do have the option to choose to send their kids to a hand-selected private school at their own expense if this is what they desire,” the deleted post read.

It continued: “The purpose of a public education in a public school is not to teach kids only what parents want them to be taught. It is to teach them what society needs them to know. The client of the public school is not the parent, but the entire community, the public[.]”

The comments echoed a sentiment expressed by failed gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe during a campaign debate last October. “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach,” then Gov. McAuliffe said during a debate with now Gov. Glenn Youngkin. McAuliffe’s statement is widely attributed to derailing his campaign.

Commenting on the Democrats' social media post, American Federation of Children Director of Research Corey D’Angelis said on Twitter: “They didn’t learn anything from Virginia. (The) Michigan legislature passed two bills to fund students instead of systems in 2021. But Governor Whitmer sided with the teachers union monopoly.”

D’Angelis encourages parents to support a petition to override Whitmer’s vetoes, saying Michigan Student Opportunity Accounts would enable families to access open schools, tutoring, and other tools to address learning loss and meet students’ individual learning needs.

Beth DeShone, Great Lakes Education Project executive director, said the Facebook post requires a public repudiation and denunciation from Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Attorney General Dana Nessel, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Democratic legislators.

“The Michigan Democratic Party might not get it, but no one knows what a child needs most like his or her parents,” DeShone said in a statement. “The Party’s classist attack on low-income and other parents is absolutely astonishing – and very telling. Public school is about kids, not Democrats’ political policy agenda.

Parents are demanding Gretchen Whitmer and other key elected Democrats reject this educational extremism and hold their party accountable.”

DeShone also noted lower-income families did not possess the financial means to send their children to private schools.

Michigan Freedom Fund Executive Director Tori Sachs also took issue with the Facebook post.

“The radical Leftists at Whitmer’s Democrat Party think they know better than parents,” Sachs said in a statement. “Claiming that parents who can’t afford private schools shouldn’t get a say in their children’s public school education is not only crazy – it’s against the law. Yet Governor Whitmer has sided with teachers unions against parents and students again and again.”

Sachs continued: “Whitmer vetoed reading scholarships and opportunity accounts for parents to use on things like transportation, tutoring, and tuition at a school of their choice. Today, thousands of Michigan students remain locked out of their classrooms without the option to attend open schools or receive additional tutoring because of Whitmer's vetoes. Government must be accountable to the people, and public schools must answer to parents – not the Whitmer Democrats, teachers unions and school bureaucrats.”

Sachs cited Michigan law, which states in Section 380.10: “It is the natural, fundamental right of parents and legal guardians to determine and direct the care, teaching, and education of their children. The public schools of this state serve the needs of the pupils by cooperating with the pupil's parents and legal guardians to develop the pupil's intellectual capabilities and vocational skills in a safe and positive environment.”

Rep. Pamela Hornberger, R-Chesterfield Twp., is House Education Committee chairwoman. She responded with her own Facebook post.

“Michigan Democrats have continually sided with the education establishment and unions to fight against school choice and parent empowerment,” Hornberger wrote. “Their decisions harm our students. If the education establishment and unions continue to fund Democrats, the Democrats will continue to vote against the best interest of Michigan’s students and families.”

In a subsequent post, the Michigan Democratic Party noted they had removed the group’s initial statement.

“We have deleted a post that ignored the important role parents play – and should play – in Michigan public schools. Parents need to have a say in their children’s education, end of story,” the post reads.

The retraction continues, “The post does not reflect the views of Michigan Democrats and should not be misinterpreted as a statement of support from our elected officials or candidates.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

SCOTTSDALE SCHOOL BOARD | YOU’VE BEEN SERVED
Posted by Kane on February 2, 2022 4:43 pm

Video 6:31 min

SCOTTSDALE SCHOOL BOARD — YOU’VE BEEN SERVED

Leigh Dundas and
Miki Klann speak to the Scottsdale Unified School District in Arizona. During the meeting, Miki declares her intention to file a claim against the Governor’s surety bond on behalf of the SUSD board members. Each member of the board will be charged with practicing medicine without a license, child abuse, segregation and inappropriate sexual material in the school libraries.

Miki served each board member with 10 letters of intent by 10 different parents. Each claim carries a liability of up to 100K – this means each board member carries a total liability of $1 million in the event that the claims are filed. Now the board members have 5 days to rectify the situation or the parents of SUSD will file the claim.

Bondsforthewin.com

How to destroy your local School Board

WATCH: THE EXACT BLUEPRINT TO DESTROY YOUR LOCAL TYRANTS!!
The Corporate Propaganda Antidote

WATCH: THE EXACT BLUEPRINT TO DESTROY YOUR LOCAL TYRANTS!! 43:35 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Colorado District Forced to Cancel Classes After Nearly 1,500 Teachers Call In Sick to Protest Recently Elected Conservative School Board

By Assistant Editor
Published February 5, 2022 at 5:45pm
classroom-2093744_1280.jpg

Douglas County schools in Colorado were shut down on Thursday after nearly 1,500 teachers called in sick to protest the recently elected conservative school board.


The party that claims to be all about Democracy is now trying to overthrow the will of the voters.

The teachers took the day off to protest outside the school board building over the newly-elected conservatives voting to end the district’s mask mandate, amend the district’s equity policy and is ask the superintendent to quit or be fired.

1644114646667.png

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1489330269140107265
.18 min

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1489331715218751492
.09 min

The following day, the school board voted to oust superintendent Corey Wise, who had been employed by the district for 25 years.

An online petition to overthrow the will of the voters and recall the conservative school board members now has over 16,000 signatures. A formal recall would not be possible until the summer. Under the rules, a board member cannot be recalled until they have served for at least six months — and they were just elected in November.

According to a report from CPR News, “Another issue that has angered some parents and school officials is the fear that the new board majority wants to dismantle the district’s equity policy. A new resolution passed by the board last week directs the superintendent to recommend changes to the equity policy that reflect the new principles in the resolution. One of those is that no policy should ‘impose stereotypical beliefs and actions of an identity group onto a student.'”

The new conservative majority school board is a trend that is happening all over the nation as parents learn more about the leftist indoctrination happening in public schools.

“Fundraising for Douglas County’s 2021 elections shattered contributions made during the district’s 2017 elections,” Insider reports. “In last year’s elections, the quartet was supported by the conservative 1776 Project PAC, a national group that launched in May that says it’s actively trying to stop critical race theory from being taught in classrooms.”
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The teachers took the day off to protest outside the school board building over the newly-elected conservatives voting to end the district’s mask mandate, amend the district’s equity policy and is ask the superintendent to quit or be fired.
Unauthorized Union job action? Are not job actions announced in advance according to Union Contract?

Employers have rights too. And a Contract is a contract.

Normally a job action would be preceded by a grievance procedure, and a meeting between the parties, and finally an arbitration. If no compromise is reached, THEN the union may walk out IF their job is not deemed "essential service" in a court of law. Teachers MIGHT find themselves so named. (Like Police/Fire/City Employees are typically) and if so deemed may find themselves out of a job.

There is a "system" to deal with these disagreements.

Oh, that's right. Teachers are largely Democrats, vote their pocket-book, and are typically "emotives" to whom systems represent not order, but restraint, and by extension, compulsion.

Um. Nobody is telling the teachers they can't wear a mask to "protect" themselves.

And if you don't like the equity policy, do what you want and see what happens when you violate policy.

One can ask all they want for a new Superintendent - he like one is an "at will employee" of the School Board.

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5IVd4T3A1M
1:18:22 min

How Critical Race Theorists Justify Racist Discrimination | The Glenn Beck Podcast | Ep 132

Premiered 7 hours ago


Glenn Beck


Critical race theory is designed to be confusing. Leftists espousing it expect people to get frustrated and give up. Until now, their plan has worked. But they didn’t expect James Lindsay. On this episode of the Glenn Beck Podcast, James gives parents a practical set of tools for dealing with this dangerous Marxist movement. Armed with the lessons from James’ new book, “Race Marxism: The Truth About Critical Race Theory and Praxis,” parents can ask the right questions, know the facts, and stand up to the bullies. And not a moment too soon. Glenn and James explain how CRT is just the tip of the iceberg: A new “religion” has formed on the far Left, and it sheds a whole new light on the Great Reset’s real goal. James breaks down its beliefs, its endgame, and its new language that has gone mainstream — one that translates “racism” as a white trait and “fascism” as everything standing in the movement's way.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Teacher Made White Elementary School Children Apologize To Black Kids For Their Skin Color

SUNDAY, FEB 06, 2022 - 08:00 PM
Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

A 5th grade teacher working in the North Penn School District made white elementary school children apologize to black kids for their skin color, according to irate parents.


The sensational claim was made during a school board meeting by the mother of a child who attends AM Kulp Elementary School.

“I actually pulled my daughter out of AM Kulp because of the 5th grade teacher who lined those students up, from whitest to darkest,” she said.

(The teacher) made them turn around and made the white ones apologize to the black ones – now do not tell me that did not happen in this district,” the mother added.

“You need to put an end to this. Kids do not see color and you are segregating them and you are separating them. This is not OK. Do something or get out of those damn chairs!” she concluded.

The mother’s complaint was bolstered by a further claim by another individual at the meeting who described how the same teacher forced children to take part in a ‘privilege walk’ multiple times.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1488635717047648258
1:40 min

“This board has repeatedly denied an activity that has taken place at AM Kulp Elementary…it happened in the courtyard…not once but four times,” said the speaker.

“A teacher…lined the students up on the wall, asked them to step forward if their parents were married, step forward if their parents were college educated, step forward if they own a cellphone or an iPhone, step forward if their skin color resembled a band aid, step forward if they had an in-ground pool.”

Explaining that multiple different parents had told him that this had happened, the speaker also related how the teacher in question “also added at one point when she asked about a band aid with a mini-megaphone, the teacher told the student to get back on the wall because her parents were from India.”

The speaker finished by accusing the school board of falsely denying that such events were taking place.

North Penn School District appears to be riddled with activist teachers intent on indoctrinating children.

Last month, we highlighted an image that went viral showing a North Penn teacher forcibly taping a mask to a child’s face.

Parents across the country have come under attack by both the media and the government for their vocal opposition to Critical Race Theory being taught in American schools.

In September last year, the National Association of School Boards (NASB) sent a letter to the Biden administration claiming parents were engaging in domestic terrorism by fighting against CRT and mask mandates.

Attorney General Merrick Garland subsequently announced the DOJ and FBI would establish a task force aimed at probing a “disturbing spike” in threats against school officials.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Wicked ADL Pushes Hate in Classrooms — Program on Diversity that Is Taught to 1.4 Million US Kids Includes Language that Only Whites Can Be Racist

By Jim Hoft
Published February 7, 2022 at 8:30am

What do you call a program that is used to indoctrinate children and push hate?

The Anti-Defamation League was once a leading human rights organization founded in 1913 in response to the escalating climate of antisemitism in the West.

Today the ADL is a far-left hate group whose goal is to smear conservatives, patriotic Americans and white people. This same organization gives a pass to leftist and Islamist hate groups.

Just this weekend the ADL excused Amnesty International in the campaign against the existence of Israel.

In 2021 the ADL labeled President Trump, the most pro-Israel president in history, as antisemitic.

They washed away Ilhan Omar’s blatant antisemitism and hateful rhetoric against Israel.

The ADL also pushes restrictions on speech and appropriate gender-neutral Halloween costumes.

And now the Anti-Defamation League is teaching children in America that only white kids are racists. They actually changed the definition of racism to target white people.

They’re openly teaching hate to American children!
adl-racism-then-and-now.jpg


And they’ve already reached 1.4 million kids.

What a wicked group.

Infowars has more on their “No Place for Hate” program that teach hate to children.

adl-hate-white-people-.jpg


The The Montgomery Advertiser reported on this indoctrination program by the ADL last week.
1,600 US schools are pushing these lies to children.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Project Veritas: New Leaked Footage Exposes Diversity and Inclusion Program Pushed by Disney to “Transform Culture” (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published February 10, 2022 at 3:15pm

IMG_0012-1.jpg

Project Veritas on Thursday released leaked footage exposing the ‘diversity and inclusion’ program pushed by Disney as part of their “Expose ESPN” series.

Earlier this week Project Veritas released undercover video exposing ‘blatantly racist sh*t’ at ESPN.

The whistleblower, ESPN Studio Operator Trevor Adams, recorded undercover video and audio of several ESPN employees discussing a toxic and racist workplace.

On Thursday, leaked footage from executives at Coqual, a global non-profit think tank who claim to be “champions of equity and researchers of culture,” exposed the racist ‘diversity and inclusion’ program pushed by Disney.

The woke Coqual executives discussed ‘Latinx’ and ‘colorism’ and different skin tones within the ‘Latinx’ community.

VIDEO:
View: https://youtu.be/StLytOqHU2w
.59 min
 
Top