GOV/MIL Leftists Call For New "Secret Police" Force To Spy On Trump Supporters (AN ABSOLUTELY MUST-READ THREAD)

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Survey: Two-Thirds of Americans Believe Schools Are Political
83
People hold up signs during a rally against critical race theory (CRT) being taught in schools at the Loudoun County Government center in Leesburg, Virginia on June 12, 2021. - Are you ready to take back our schools? Republican activist Patti Menders shouted at a rally opposing anti-racism teaching that …
ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images
BRECCAN F. THIES23 Dec 202194

American parents are overwhelmingly concerned with what is being taught in schools and believe schools have gotten political over the last two years, according to a survey conducted by Free to Learn (FTL).

Overall, 81 percent of Americans are concerned with the quality of education today, with 59 percent concerned specifically with what their children are learning, and 66 percent believing schools have become more political since the pandemic’s debilitating lockdowns.

The same survey showed a majority of American parents having seen negative outcomes from virtual learning, including the state of their child’s academic achievement (55 percent) and mental health (60 percent). More than half of those surveyed, 52 percent, said they became more involved with their child’s curriculum as a result of virtual learning.

Free to Learn Nationwide Survey Infographic. (freetolearn.org)
Free to Learn Nationwide Survey Infographic. (freetolearn.org).

FTL President Alleigh Marré sent the findings in a letter to American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, National School Boards Association President Viola Garcia, and National Education Association President Becky Pringle, telling them that while parents are seeing the negative impacts of virtual learning, American families see their “organizations flexing [their] power to keep schools shuttered.”

While the survey found that 81 percent of respondents were concerned about the quality of academic education, 48 percent said they are “very concerned.”

“Despite the unending push by your organizations to de-emphasize academic achievement in the name of activism,” Marré said, “there was overwhelming consensus in our research that American families are extremely concerned with how K-12 schools are performing.”

An overwhelming majority of parents also believe they should have the ability to request the curriculum being taught to their children from the school (72 percent) and opt their child out of a program they deem inappropriate or harmful (67 percent).

The survey was conducted from November 29 to December 3, 2021, among 1,200 American parents with a margin of error of +/- 2.83 percent.

“From Covid to culture wars,” Marré began her letter, “the education of students across the United States has been turned upside down over the last two years.”

Describing how their organizations have contributed negatively to the state of education, Marré said, “Even as teachers work tirelessly to meet the real, concrete needs of their students, the so-called professional organizations are instead focused on activism, control, and political influence.”

“While your immediate constituency may be teachers and School Board members, those individuals are public servants,” she continued:
Advising those same public servants to engage with their communities through the lens of activism and politics, while strongarming them to ignore the wishes of those most invested in students’ futures, has contributed mightily to the dissatisfaction we see across the country.
Marré cited Fairfax County, Virginia’s, sharp enrollment drop so that the education organizations might “understand the gravity of this loss of confidence in your leadership.”

As Breitbart News reported, according to the Virginia Department of Education, “overall, enrollment has fallen by more than 46,000 students since 2019, a nearly four percent drop since the beginning of the coronavirus.”

While enrollment has dropped in Virginia, staffing has declined as well, with the number of “unfilled education positions have increased 62 percent.”

“It is my sincere hope that you’ll see this polling data not as a threat but as insight that will help focus your efforts to best serve our nation’s students,” Marré concluded.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

LOUDOUN COUNTY CALLS TEACHERS 'SECOND MOTHER,' CLAIMS PARENTS' ROLE TO 'RESPECT TEACHERS' AUTHORITY'

JOSEPH GUNDERSON
DECEMBER 23, 2021

School is out for the holidays at the moment, but that doesn’t mean we aren’t going to be getting plenty of material illustrating how terrible they are. And it just so happens that one of the worst school districts in the country—or at least the one that seems to provide us the most evidence—has decided to give us even more evidence! The Loudoun County schools paid for teachers to receive instruction in Critical Race Theory instruction. This one’s a doozy.

The instruction breaks up into two categories: white individualism and color group collectivism. Why would it be anything else? CRT is all about creating divisions. But what might be more disconcerting are the bullets throughout the graphic.

On the “white individualism” side of the chart it describes pretty much everything the schools want to change about your children.

The Focus is on the child as an individual.

Children are expected to form and express opinions, even question elders.

Teachers and parents are equals.


May I just say, there will never be a world in which a teacher is my equal. When it comes to my daughter, I outrank any teacher, and I’m sure many parents feel the same way. That’s kind of the discussion occurring around the country at the moment, is it not?

Oh, but on the “color group collectivism” side of the chart, it sounds as if the child is already being brought up in a socialist society, everything the teachers love. But take not of the last section:

Teachers have a special role to teach academics (and to inculcate morals). “The teacher is the second mother.” Parents’ role is to socialize children (and respect teachers’ authority).

So, all you parents who aren’t white, you better respect the authority of those teachers who actually believe they are a parent to your children. I wouldn’t accept this. Some of the remaining good teachers aren’t accepting this.

Parents, public school teachers are actively attempting to usurp your authority over your children, to undermine your moral teaching to mold your kids into what they want, regardless of what you desire. After all, these schools aren’t for learning, they’re for indoctrination. And they believe they are on par or superior to you, depending on what your skin color is.

These people are ignorant bigots who are going to call you ignorant bigots if you challenge them.

Challenge them. It’s the only chance your children have.

Rumble video 7:07 min
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Don't Let Cancel Culture Grinches Strip Your Joy From Christmas

FRIDAY, DEC 24, 2021 - 06:00 PM
Authored by John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,
“It’s Christmas Eve! It’s the one night of the year when we all act a little nicer, we smile a little easier, we cheer a little more. For a couple of hours out of the whole year, we are the people that we always hoped we would be! It’s a sort of a miracle because it happens every Christmas Eve… There are people that are having trouble making their miracle happen… It’s not just the poor and the hungry, it’s everybody that’s gotta have this miracle!”— Scrooged (1988)
What a year.

It feels as if government Grinches, corporate Scrooges, and cancel culture humbugs have been working overtime to drain every last drop of joy, kindness and liberty from the world.



After endless months of gloom and doom, it can be hard to feel the joy of Christmas in the midst of rampant commercialism, political correctness and the casual cruelty of an apathetic, self-absorbed, dog-eat-dog world.

Then again, isn’t that struggle to overcome the darkness and find the light within exactly what Christmas—the celebration of a baby born in a manger—is all about? The reminder that we have not been forgotten or forsaken. Glad tidings in the midst of hard times. Goodwill to counter meanness. Innocence in the face of cynicism. Hope in the midst of despair. Comfort to soothe our fears. Peace as an answer to war. Love that conquers hate.

As “fellow-passengers to the grave,” we all have a moral duty to make this world (or at least our small corners of it) just a little bit kinder, a little less hostile and a lot more helpful to those in need.

No matter what one’s budget, religion, or political persuasion, there is no shortage of things we can each do right now to pay our blessings forward and recapture the true spirit of Christmas.

For starters, move beyond the “us” vs. “them” mentality. Tune into what’s happening in your family, in your community and your world, and get active.

Show compassion to those in need, be kind to those around you, forgive those who have wronged you, and teach your children to do the same. Talk less, and listen more. Take less, and give more. Stop being a hater. Stop acting entitled and start being empowered. Learn tolerance in the true sense of the word. Value your family. Count your blessings. Share your blessings. Feed the hungry, shelter the homeless and comfort the lonely and broken-hearted. Build bridges, and tear down walls. Stand for freedom. Strive for peace.

One thing more: make time for joy and laughter. Shake off the blues with some Christmas tunes, whatever fits the bill for you, be it traditional carols, rollicking oldies, or some rocking new tunes. Watch a Christmas movie that reinforces your faith in the things that truly matter.

Here are ten of my favorite Christmas movies and music albums to get you started.

First the movies.
It’s A Wonderful Life (1946). An American classic about a despondent man, George Bailey who is saved from suicide by an angel working to get his wings. This film is a testament to director Frank Capra’s faith in people. Sublime performances by James Stewart and Donna Reed.
The Bishop’s Wife (1947). An angel comes to earth in answer to a bishop’s prayer for help. Cary Grant, David Niven and Loretta Young help energize this tale of lost visions and longings of the heart.
Miracle on 34th Street (1947). By happenchance, Kris Kringle is hired as Santa Claus by Macy’s Department Store in New York City for the Thanksgiving Day Parade. Before long, Kringle, who believes himself to be the one and only Santa Claus, has impacted virtually everyone around him. Funny, witty and heartwarming, this film is stocked with some fine performances from Maureen O’Hara, John Payne and young Natalie Wood. Edmund Gwenn won the Academy Award for best supporting actor for his role as Saint Nick.

A Christmas Carol (1951). This is the best film version of the penny-pinching Scrooge’s journey to spiritual enlightenment by way of visits from supernatural visitors. Alastair Sim as Scrooge gives one of the finest film performances never to win an Oscar. The Man Who Invented Christmas (2017) provides a wonderful glimpse into how Charles Dickens came to write A Christmas Carol.

A Christmas Story (1983). Ralphie is a young boy obsessed with one thing and only one thing: how to get a Red Ryder BB-gun for Christmas. Ralphie’s parents are wary, and his mother continually warns him that “you’ll shoot your eye out.” Based on Jean Shepherd’s autobiographical book In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash, at the heart of this timeless comedy is the universal yearning of a child for the magic of Christmas morning. A great cast, which includes Darren McGavin, Peter Billingsley, Melinda Dillon and a voice-over narrative by Shepherd himself.

One Magic Christmas (1985). If you grew up in a family where times were tough, this film is for you. A guardian angel comes to earth to help a disillusioned woman who hates Christmas. This tale of redemption and second chances is a delight to watch. And Harry Dean Stanton makes a first-class offbeat angel.

Prancer (1989). This story of an eight-year-old girl who believes that an injured reindeer in her barn is actually one of Santa’s reindeer is one of the most down-to-earth Christmas films ever made. It’s a testament to the transforming power of love and childhood innocence. Sam Elliott and Cloris Leachman are fine in supporting roles, but Rebecca Harrell shines. Filmed on location in freezing, snowy weather, this film is a treat for those who love Christmas.

Home Alone (1990). Eight-year-old Kevin, accidentally left behind at home when his family flies to Paris for Christmas, thinks he’s got it made. Hijinks ensue when two burglars match their wits against his. A funny, tender tribute to childhood and the bonds of family.

Elf (2003). Another modern classic with a lot of heart. Buddy, played to the hilt by Will Ferrell, is a human who was raised by elves at the North Pole. Determined to find his birth father, Buddy travels to the Big Apple and spreads his Christmas cheer to everyone he meets. This film has it all: Santa, elves, family problems, humor, emotion and above all else, a large dose of the Christmas spirit. One of the best Christmas movies ever made.

The Christmas Chronicles (2018). The story of a sister and brother, Kate and Teddy Pierce, whose Christmas Eve plan to catch Santa Claus on camera turns into an unexpected journey that most kids could only dream about. Kurt Russell’s star turn as Santa makes for movie magic.
Now for the music.

Out of the hundreds of Christmas albums I’ve listened to over the years, the following, covering a broad range of musical styles, moods and tastes, each in its own way perfectly captures the essence of Christmas for me.
It’s Christmas (EMI, 1989): 18 great songs, ranging from John Lennon’s “Happy Xmas (War Is Over)” to Bing Crosby’s “White Christmas.” The real treats on this album are Greg Lake’s “I Believe in Father Christmas,” Kate Bush’s “December Will Be Magic Again” and Aled Jones’ “Walking in the Air.”

Christmas Guitar (Rounder, 1986): 28 beautifully done traditional Christmas songs by master guitarist John Fahey. Hearing Fahey’s guitar strings plucking out “Joy to the World,” “Good King Wenceslas,” “Jolly Old Saint Nicholas,” among others, is a sublime experience.

Christmas Is A Special Day (The Right Stuff, 1993): 12 fine songs by Fats Domino, the great Fifties rocker, ranging from “Amazing Grace” to “Jingle Bells.” The title song, written by Domino himself, is a real treat.

No one has ever played the piano keys like Fats.

Christmas Island (August/Private Music, 1989): “Frosty the Snowman” will never sound the same after you hear Leon Redbone and Dr. John do their duet. Neither will “Christmas Island” or “Toyland” on this collection of 11 traditional and rather offbeat songs.

A Holiday Celebration (Gold Castle, 1988): The classic folk trio Peter, Paul & Mary, backed by the New York Choral Society, sing traditional and nontraditional holiday fare on 12 beautifully orchestrated songs. Included are “I Wonder as I Wander,” “Children Go Where I Send Thee,” and “The Cherry Tree Carol.” Also thrown in is Bob Dylan’s “Blowin’ in the Wind.”

The Christmas Album (Columbia, 1992): Neil Diamond sings 14 songs, ranging from “Silent Night” to “Jingle Bell Rock” to “The Christmas Song” to “Come, O Come Emmanuel.” Diamond also gives us a great rendition of Lennon’s “Happy Xmas (War Is Over).” A delightful album.

A Charlie Brown Christmas (Fantasy, 1988): 12 traditional Christmas songs by the Vince Guaraldi Trio. The pianist extraordinaire and his trio perform “O Tannenbaum,” “The Christmas Song” and “Greensleeves.” Also included is the Charlie Brown Christmas theme.

The Jethro Tull Christmas Album (Fuel Records, 2003): If you like deep-rooted traditional holiday songs, you’ll love this album. The 16 songs range from “God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen” to Ian Anderson originals such as “Another Christmas Song” and “Jack Frost and the Hooded Crow.” With Anderson on flute and vocals, this album has an old world flavor that will have you wanting mince pie and plum pudding.

A Twisted Christmas (Razor Tie, 2006): Twisted Sister, the heavy metal group, knocks the socks off a bevy of traditional and pop Christmas songs. Dee Snider’s amazing vocals brings to life “Oh Come All Ye Faithful,” “Deck the Halls,” “I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus,” among others—including “Heavy Metal Christmas (The Twelve Days of Christmas).” Great fun and a great band.

Songs for Christmas (Asthmatic Kitty, 2006): In 2001, independent singer/songwriter Sufjan Stevens set out to create a Christmas gift through songs for his friends and family. It eventually grew to a 5-CD box set, which includes Stevens’ original take on such standards as “Amazing Grace” and “We Three Kings” and some inventive yuletide creations of his own. A lot of fun.
Before you know it, Christmas will be a distant memory and we’ll be back to our regularly scheduled programming of “us vs. them” politics, war, violence, materialism and mayhem.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, there may not be much we can do to avoid the dismal reality of the American police state in the long term—not so long as the powers-that-be allow profit margins to take precedence over people—but in the short term, I hope you’ll do your part to “spread a smile of joy” and “throw your arms around the world at Christmastime.”

As you celebrate the season, take to heart the closing sermon in The Bishop’s Wife:
“Once upon a midnight clear, there was a child’s cry, a blazing star hung over a stable, and wise men came with birthday gifts. We haven’t forgotten that night down the centuries. We celebrate it with stars on Christmas trees, with the sound of bells, and with gifts… We forget nobody, adult or child. All the stockings are filled, all that is, except one. And we have even forgotten to hang it up. The stocking for the child born in a manger. It’s his birthday we’re celebrating. Don’t let us ever forget that. Let us ask ourselves what He would wish for most.

And then, let each put in his share, loving kindness, warm hearts, and a stretched out hand of tolerance. All the shining gifts that make peace on earth.”—The Bishop’s Wife (1947)
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Black Lives Matter Activists Tell Students ‘Crime Is Made up,’ Black People Are ‘Enslaved’ when They Go to Jail
19
Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO) speaks at the National Council for Incarcerated Women and Girls 100 Women for 100 Women rally at Black Lives Matter Plaza on March 12, 2021 in Washington, DC. The organization and its supporters are calling on President Joe Biden to release 100 women currently incarcerated in …
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
ALANA MASTRANGELO24 Dec 202114

Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists gave a talk to over 150 people in the spring of 2020, telling students that “crime is made up” and black people are “enslaved” when they are sent to jail, among other things.

Four BLM activists — Jessica Louise, Kyra Jay Harvey, Michelle Anastasia, and Leah Derray — from the Marxist organization’s Indy10 Black Lives Matter – told students that black people often don’t have the same opportunities as their white counterparts, according to a video of the lecture obtained by Daily Caller.

“Crime is made up,” Derray said. “People created these rules and people break them. It’s just that if you are black, brown, or poor, you are more likely to be jailed for these things, to be enslaved, imprisoned, for these things that a lot of people do.”

Derray also said that people she knew when she graduated high school were “all sent to prison,” and that when she was younger, she was taught, “If you do the crime you do the time,” but argued that “It’s not about us doing crime, it’s about crime being done to our communities.”

“I’ve really had to learn to retain my anger,” she said. “You know, when you really start to learn about white supremacy and capitalism and how it really harms black and brown people.”

The BLM activists also claimed that they live in a “misogynistic, masculine society” which tells them that “women should stay at home” to cook and clean, and that as black women, they are “overlooked a lot,” and encounter people who want to harm them because of who they are.

Harvey claimed that the voices of “black women and fems” are “not heard,” and they “don’t get seats at the table.”

The BLM activist added that people see black women and want to harm them, and that black women also encounter “some people who don’t think there’s anything wrong with the police, or think the police are doing their job.”

Derray added that black females are victims of “emotional labor” because people don’t respect their autonomy or the fact that they are people.

Anastasia also cited Critical Race Theory (CRT), and Angela Davis, an avowed Marxist who came to prominence in the 1960s as a leader of the Communist Party U.S.A., and is best known for being the second black woman to make the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted List for her role in a courtroom shootout that resulted in the death of Judge Harold Haley.

The lecture was part of a so-called “Racial Justice Speaker Series,” given to students at the K-8 Butler University Laboratory School 60.

Daily Caller obtained the video from Tony Kinnett, district science coordinator & instructional coach for Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS), and founder of Chalkboard Review.

Kinnett is currently suspended with pay while the district investigates him for “potential misconduct,” Daily Caller reports.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Jesuit-Led Loyola Academics Urge Continued Teaching of CRT in K-12 Schools
New York City school kids listen as Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio introduces the next schools chancellor, Carmen Farina, Monday, Dec. 30, 2013 at MS 51 in the Brooklyn borough of New York. Farina, a former teacher, principal and longtime advocate of early childhood education, will be the next leader of …
AP Photo/Mark Lennihan
DR. SUSAN BERRY24 Dec 202117

Faculty members of the School of Education at Loyola University Maryland argued recently that while there are many topics that should be kept at the collegiate level because they are too advanced or inappropriate for children, Critical Race Theory (CRT) is not among them.

In an essay published at the Jesuit-led Loyola website, at the start of the academic year, Benjamin Parker, Ph.D., Christine Mahady, Ed.D., and David Marcovitz, Ph.D., did not bother to participate in the many denials by K-12 school administrators and teachers’ union bosses that CRT is being taught in their districts.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1456229919986528258
1:36 min

Instead, the Loyola faculty members praised the widely discredited “1619 Project” as a “landmark work” and “educative tool to be used to initiate honest and representative discussions in schools of the enduring legacy of slavery.”

The academics criticized the firestorm about CRT created by parents and concerned citizens in many K-12 districts:
For too long K-12 schools have been overly deferential in their approach to teaching anything that could be perceived as sensitive, political, or controversial. The result of this “neutral” stance is a large population of students that have never engaged in thoughtful or critical discussions about the role that race plays in society and the intersections of identity, place, power, and opportunity. Those discussions should not be limited only to college-bound students.
There are plenty of topics that are reserved for the collegiate level and have difficulty translating to K-12 schools because they are too specific, advanced, or inappropriate for children. However, CRT does not fit those criteria.
1640397386218.png

As John Murawski observed Tuesday at RealClearInvestigations, the essay’s authors praised Marvin Lynn of Portland State University’s College of Education as a “renowned Education and CRT scholar.”

Murawski wrote that Lynn agreed:
… conservatives are correct that CRT can be found in K-12 schools, but they exaggerate its influence because they assume every critique of systemic racism, structures of oppression and whiteness comes from CRT, when many scholars and activists who have never studied CRT use this terminology.
“Before we were even a nation, we were a slave state,” Lynn said, according to Murawski. “If that is your culture, if that is the way you were raised up, why would you think there’s anything wrong with suppressing and oppressing people based on their race?”

“If we haven’t done anything to undo that culture of oppression, why would white people be any different in terms of their thinking about black people today?” Lynn reportedly asked.

1640397312137.png

“The recent political attacks on CRT are dangerous,” the Loyola faculty members continued, “and are predicated on the power of misinformation and misrepresentation.”

They dismissed the concerns, vehemently expressed by many parents and activists who have condemned the revisionist history that teaches that, from its founding, America has been a racist nation, as simply political.

“[T]hese attempts to delegitimize decades of rigorous scholarship aimed at making our nation more just, equitable, representative, and conscious through examinations of laws, policies, and practices are by no means innocuous,” they wrote. “Fanning the flames of a ‘culture war,’ some politicians and media outlets are pitting CRT against ‘American’ values, history, and exceptionalism.”

1640397246032.png

The academics accused the numerous “school board members, politicians, faith leaders, parents, and citizens at-large” who are battling the teaching of the tenets of CRT of “stoking the fears of equity by insisting it is cloaking something insidious.”

“Every teacher, educational leader, and stakeholder that has been trained using CRT and witnessed the reality of it in the schools where they work or live must use their voice to resist this dangerous swell of divisiveness,” they argued.

“[A]s an institution of higher education, first we want to publicly express our commitment to CRT and anti-racist education, making it known that we will continue to prepare future educators using these methods,” the Loyola academics vowed.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqCxYUPlXcA
14:58 min

Progressives DESTROYED our traditions. Here’s how to restore them.

Dec 24, 2021


Glenn Beck


It seems more and more Americans are losing the Christmas spirit — at least, Glenn says, most of his staff feel that way. Is the rise of consumerism to blame? The lack of Jesus in our daily lives? Or perhaps, Glenn says, it’s the social polarization that’s grown to become our ‘new normal’ over the last several years.

We’re losing our traditions, our family time, and everything else that SHOULD be held sacred…especially during the holidays. And if we don’t restore those traditions, Glenn says, progressives and the far-left will HAPPILY replace them with something else. But we CAN restore who we are and what we’ve seemingly left behind. In this clip, Glenn explains how.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

Canada's public health agency admits it tracked 33 million mobile devices during lockdown
The Public Health Agency of Canada accessed data such as cell-tower location to monitor people’s activity during lockdown, it said

Author of the article: Swikar Oli
Publishing date: Dec 24, 2021 • 20 hours ago • 3 minute read • 356 Comments

The Public Health Agency of Canada accessed location data from 33 million mobile devices to monitor people’s movement during lockdown, the agency revealed this week.

“Due to the urgency of the pandemic, (PHAC) collected and used mobility data, such as cell-tower location data, throughout the COVID-19 response,” a spokesperson told National Post. The program’s existence was first brought to wider attention by Blacklock’s Reporter.

PHAC used the location data to evaluate the effectiveness of public lockdown measures and allow the Agency to “understand possible links between movement of populations within Canada and spread of COVID-19,” the spokesperson said.

In March, the Agency awarded a contract to the Telus Data For Good program to provide “de-identified and aggregated data” of movement trends in Canada. The contract expired in October, and PHAC no longer has access to the location data, the spokesperson said.

The Agency is planning to track population movement for roughly the next five years, including to address other public health issues, such as “other infectious diseases, chronic disease prevention and mental health,” the spokesperson added.

Privacy advocates raised concerns to the National Post about the long-term implications of the program.

“I think that the Canadian public will find out about many other such unauthorized surveillance initiatives before the pandemic is over—and afterwards,” David Lyon, author of Pandemic Surveillance and former director of the Surveillance Studies Centre at Queen’s University, said in an email.

Lyon warned that PHAC “uses the same kinds of ‘reassuring’ language as national security agencies use, for instance not mentioning possibilities for re-identifying data that has been ‘de-identified.’”
“In principle, of course, cell data can be used for tracking.”

Mobility data analysis “helps to advance public health objectives,” the PHAC spokesperson said. The findings have been regularly shared with provinces and territories via the special advisory committee to “inform public health messaging, planning and policy development,” the spokesperson said.

The data is also used for the COVID Trends portal, a dashboard that provides a summarized data of movement trends.

Lyon urged a need for greater information “regarding exactly what was done, what was achieved and whether or not it truly served the interests of Canadian citizens.”

Deploying surveillance tools for public health purposes also raises to the issue of equity, Martin French, an associate professor of Concordia University focusing on surveillance, privacy and social justice, noted in an email.

“There are populations that could experience an intensification of tracking that could have harmful (rather than beneficial) repercussions.”

Increased use of surveillance technology during the COVID-19 pandemic has created a new normal in the name of security, Lyon said.

“The pandemic has created opportunities for a massive surveillance surge on many levels—not only for public health, but also for monitoring those working, shopping and learning from home.”

“Evidence is coming in from many sources, from countries around the world, that what was seen as a huge surveillance surge—post 9/11—is now completely upstaged by pandemic surveillance,” he added.

In a notice posted earlier this week, the agency called for contractors with access to “cell-tower/operator location data in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and for other public health applications.” It asks for “de-identified cell-tower based location data from across Canada” beginning from from Jan. 2019 until the end of the contract period on May 31, 2023, with possibility of three one-year extensions.

The contractor must provide anonymized data to PHAC and ensure its users have the ability to easily opt-out of mobility data sharing programs, the agency says.

PHAC’s privacy management division conducted an assessment and “determined that since no personal information is being acquired through this contract, there are no concerns under the Privacy Act,” the spokesperson said.

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner said it is “following up with PHAC to obtain more information about the proposed initiative” and could not provide additional comment at this time.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Americans Get Warning They’re Being Watched Digitally

Bob Unruh
December 25, 2021

Americans Get Warning They're Being Watched Digitally


Americans are getting a warning that they are being watched digitally, whether they agree to the spying or not.

Read more by Bob Unruh at WND News Center.

The warning is coming from the Rutherford Institute, which has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in a dispute now pending before the Supreme Court, in Hammond v. U.S.

The warning is that “Americans are being swept up into a massive digital data dragnet that does not distinguish between those who are innocent of wrongdoing, suspects, or criminals. ”

The Rutherford Institute said it is “challenging the government’s unconstitutional practice of warrantlessly tracking people’s location and movements through their personal cell phones in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”

Institute attorneys charge that technological advancements in cell phone providers’ ability to obtain data on their users’ whereabouts, especially as a result of cell site proliferation due to 5G networks, means that law enforcement can use “triangulation methods” to identify a person’s location, very specifically.

So the technology knows when you are at church, or at home, at a library, a theater or a political event.

The amicus brief, filed in cooperation with the Cato Institute, addresses the issue.

“Cell phones have become de facto snitches, offering up a steady stream of digital location data on users’ movements and travels,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People.

“Added to that, police are tracking people’s movements by way of license plate toll readers; scouring social media posts; triangulating data from cellphone towers and WiFi signals; layering facial recognition software on top of that; and then cross-referencing footage with public social media posts, all in an effort to identify, track and eventually round us up. This is what it means to live in a suspect society.”

The case at hand developed following a series of armed robberies in 2017 in Michigan and Indiana.

Federal investigations traced one of the weapons used to a former owner, who reported he sold it to a Rex Hammond. The former owner gave officers Hammond’s phone number

“Without obtaining a search warrant, a local police detective then requested cell site location information (‘CSLI’) from AT&T to geolocate Hammond’s cell phone using real-time pings to nearby cell towers about every fifteen minutes,” the institute reported.

They also traced his movements back in time.

Then they arrested him, and a grand jury indicted him on eight charges connected to the robberies. He was convicted and sentenced to 47 years in prison.

Appealing to the Supreme Court, Hammond’s lawyers warned “real-time cell phone pinging thus allows the state to surreptitiously track the movements of any individual with a cell phone (essentially all Americans) with a voyeuristic level of precision, and without ever leaving the precinct.”

They charge that violates the Constitution.

Other law enforcement spying has met with varying results at appeals courts.

One previous ruling said officers were not allowed to attach a locator unit to a suspect’s vehicle and trace his movements, without a search warrant
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Canada)


Canada Admits To Secretly Tracking 33 Million Phones During Covid-19 Lockdown

SUNDAY, DEC 26, 2021 - 03:15 PM
Canada - which has a population of 38 million - has admitted to secretly tracking 33 million phones during the Covid-19 lockown, according to the National Post, citing Blacklock's Reporter which first noted the disclosure.



The country's Public Health Agency (PHAC) did so to assess "the public’s responsiveness during lockdown measures," according to the report.
In March, the Agency awarded a contract to the Telus Data For Good program to provide “de-identified and aggregated data” of movement trends in Canada. The contract expired in October, and PHAC no longer has access to the location data, the spokesperson said. -National Post
"Evidence is coming in from many sources, from countries around the world, that what was seen as a huge surveillance surge — post 9/11 — is now completely upstaged by pandemic surveillance," according to "Pandemic Surveillance" author David Lyon, the former director of the Surveillance Studies Centre and Queen's University in Ontario. "I think that the Canadian public will find out about many other such unauthorized surveillance initiatives before the pandemic is over—and afterwards."

Location and movement data was purchased from Canadian telecom giant Telus in order to "understand possible links between the movement of populations within Canada and the spread of COVID-19," according to an agency spokesperson, who said that the mobility data analysis "helps to advance public health objectives."

Privacy advocates say public health monitoring jeopradizes user privacy. (via National Post)
Meanwhile, PHAC intends to continue tracking population movement for at least the next five years to monitor behavior concerning "other infectious diseases, chronic disease prevention and mental health," the spokesperson added.
In a notice posted earlier this week, the agency called for contractors with access to “cell-tower/operator location data in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and for other public health applications.”
It asks for “de-identified cell-tower based location data from across Canada” beginning from from Jan. 2019 until the end of the contract period on May 31, 2023, with possibility of three one-year extensions.

The contractor must provide anonymized data to PHAC and ensure its users have the ability to easily opt-out of mobility data sharing programs, the agency says.

PHAC’s privacy management division conducted an assessment and “determined that since no personal information is being acquired through this contract, there are no concerns under the Privacy Act,” the spokesperson said. -National Post
According to Lyon, PHAC is using "the same kinds of 'reassuring' language as national security agencies use, for instance not mentioning possibilities for re-identifying data that has been 'de-identified.'"

"In principle, of course, cell data can be used for tracking," he added.

"The pandemic has created opportunities for a massive surveillance surge on many levels—not only for public health, but also for monitoring those working, shopping and learning from home."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Conservatives Inundate Loudoun County Schools with Over 500 FOIA Requests
3,615
A woman sits with her sign during a Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) board meeting in Ashburn, Virginia on October 12, 2021. - Loudoun county school board meetings have become tense recently with parents clashing with board members over transgender issues, the teaching of critical race theory (CRT), and Covid-19 …
ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images
BRECCAN F. THIES26 Dec 2021146

Conservatives seeking information about a Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) alleged sexual assault coverup, among other things, have flooded the school division with over 500 Virginia Freedom of Information Act (VFOIA) requests, according to Loudoun Now.

From 2012 to 2018, the outlet said, the average yearly number of VFOIA requests was about 90.

Approximately 40 percent of the requests — made by “a half-dozen individuals” — have been filed by members or allies of Fight for Schools, a Loudoun-based education advocacy organization which has been behind several efforts to recall school board members.

Loudoun County schools have been a hotbed of political activity this year, as parents realized the district was teaching the tenets of the race-essentialist indoctrination scheme called critical race theory and appears to have covered up at least two instances of sexual assault in an effort to pass a sweeping transgender policy allowing males to use female bathrooms and play against females in sports.

As Breitbart News reported, the alleged sexual assault coverup resulted in the resignation of one school board member and an apology from Superintendent Scott Ziegler, saying, “I am sorry that we failed to provide the safe, welcoming, and affirming environment that we aspire to provide.”'

According to LCPS Public Information Officer Wayde Byard, the district has had to double the number of officials who process VFOIA requests and “has begun billing VFIOA requesters because it cannot handle the current volume free of charge.”

As Breitbart News reported, one VFOIA requester was billed more than $36,000. Loudoun County mother Michelle Mege had “asked for ‘all communications, including press releases, statements, emails, or other correspondence in any format within the LCPS possession’ that use the words ‘sexual assault’ or ‘rape’ between May 1 and Oct. 18, 2021.”

Byard explained his calculation at the time, saying that there were over 100,000 “potential documents” at an hourly retrieval rate of $72.15, but that the real cost came from the 500 estimated hours it would take to review all the documents for potential redactions, among other things.

Virginia Attorney General elect Jason Miyares (R) vowed to investigate LCPS over the sexual assault issue.

Other VFOIA requesters include Fight for Schools Executive Director Ian Prior, Parents Against Critical Race Theory head Scott Mineo, and Elicia Brand, spokeswoman for Scott Smith and his family. Smith’s daughter was the victim of an aforementioned sexual assault at school.

According to Loudoun Now, state Del. Danica Roem (D) has introduced a bill to the General Assembly that would cap VFOIA request hourly rates at $33, saying that, acting against the interests of a VFOIA requester, “the current system overwhelmingly defaults to the side of the custodians and I’m working to bring the pendulum to the center so we have actual balance.”

But Roem’s bill has met with opposition from local governments, who fear a more accessible FOIA system might encourage harassment in the form of an increase in the volume of requests.

Virginia Coalition for Open Government Executive Director Megan Rhyne, however, said “you can’t just say harassment is sheer volume because there are things that happen in state and local government that are going to happen that have intense public interest and with that public interest will come an increase in VFOIA filings.”

As Breitbart News reported, LCPS has seen a “mass exodus” of students, potentially costing the district around $7 million in state funding.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Hannah-Jones: Parents Shouldn’t Decide what’s Being Taught In Schools — ‘Leave That to the Educators’

PAM KEY26 Dec 20214,774

Video on website 9:50 min

Nikole Hannah-Jones, 1619 Project creator and professor, said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that parents should not be in charge of deciding what is taught in schools.

Hannah-Jones said, “I don’t really understand this idea that parents should decide what’s being taught. I’m not a professional educator. I don’t have a degree in social studies or science. We send our children to school because we want them to be taught by people who have expertise in the subject area. And that is not my job.”

Referencing former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, Hannah-Jones said, “When the governor or the candidate said he didn’t think parents should be deciding what’s being taught in school, he was panned for that, but that’s just the fact. This is why we send our children to school and don’t homeschool, because these are the professional educators who have the expertise to teach social studies, to teach history, to teach science, to teach literature. I think we should leave that to the educators. Yes, we should have some say, but school is not about simply confirming our worldview. Schools should teach us to question. They should teach us how to think, not what to think.”

Nikole Hannah-Jones, 1619 Project creator and professor, said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that parents should not be in charge of deciding what is taught in schools.

Hannah-Jones said, “I don’t really understand this idea that parents should decide what’s being taught. I’m not a professional educator. I don’t have a degree in social studies or science. We send our children to school because we want them to be taught by people who have expertise in the subject area. And that is not my job.”

Referencing former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, Hannah-Jones said, “When the governor or the candidate said he didn’t think parents should be deciding what’s being taught in school, he was panned for that, but that’s just the fact. This is why we send our children to school and don’t homeschool, because these are the professional educators who have the expertise to teach social studies, to teach history, to teach science, to teach literature. I think we should leave that to the educators. Yes, we should have some say, but school is not about simply confirming our worldview. Schools should teach us to question. They should teach us how to think, not what to think.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Children belong to the state…
Posted by Kane on December 27, 2021 11:48 am

View: https://youtu.be/o9RU9XV9ZwM
.42 min

Nikole Hannah Jones — who created the much maligned 1619 Project — “Parents shouldn’t be in charge of their kids’ schooling. I don’t really understand this idea that parents should decide what’s being taught.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Minnesota School Board Votes to Give Minority Teachers Higher Pay

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published December 28, 2021 at 1:12pm
00-120.jpg

A Minnesota school board unanimously voted for a resolution that will give minority teachers extra pay to mentor other minority teachers.

The policy will place minority teachers together, creating segregation, according to some critics of the policy.

According to a report from Minnesota’s Alpha News, the Mankato School Board is chaired by a woman named Jodi Sapp, who previously required parents to dox themselves in order to comment at meetings.

The report says that the new policy will be “placing American Indian educators at sites with other American Indian educators and educators of color at sites with other educators of color.” They claim to be aiming to “increase opportunity for collegial support” for minority teachers.

When responding to critics who claimed that the policy is segregation, board member Erin Roberts said that it is not, and that they are simply trying to show minority teachers that they are “not alone.”

“When you’re one [minority] of a [white] majority it can be very isolating and lonely. To have a support system in place for them is not to segregate them, it is absolutely to support them,” Roberts said. “It’s not about trying to throw the few [BIPOC] individuals we have into one building. It’s about showing them they aren’t alone.”

“It creates global citizens at the end of the day,” Vice Chair Kenneth Reid added, according to the report.

State Rep. Jeremy Munson has slammed the policy for paying people more based on the color of their skin.

“Our largest local school district just voted to pay people differently, not on merit, or by the content of their character, but based solely on the color of their skin,” Munson wrote on Facebook.

1640737349456.png

Munson added, “This is allowed and encouraged under a revision to Minnesota state Statute 122A.70. Mankato Area Public Schools Policy number 466 provides pay for black and native American school staff above which is paid to white employees. “
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

TikTok Promoting "Proud Groomer Teacher" Videos

TUESDAY, DEC 28, 2021 - 06:40 PM

Rod Dreher at The American Conservative details the disturbing trend of school teachers openly bragging on popular social media platforms about indoctrinating young children in their classes with transgender and "sexual rights" instruction. "Call it confidence, or call it arrogance, but there are some young schoolteachers who brag on TikTok about telling the little kids in their class all about transgenderism and gender theory," Dreher writes.

It comes also as a number of media reports in the US and UK have correlated the amount of time children spend online consuming content on apps like TikTok and their willingness to "come out" as a different gender, at increasingly young ages. One recent Daily Mail article observes that "Campaigners have accused TikTok of helping children to be 'brainwashed' by hosting viral social-media videos that promote changing sex as 'cool'."

"Material posted by transgender influencers on the social networking service – in which they provide advice on transitioning and accessing hormone therapies – has been seen by millions of young viewers," the report continues.

The phenomenon is fueling a 'social contagion' of pressure to persuade young people that they were not 'born in the right body', the report continues:
"Some parents are concerned the involvement of TikTok, which became the UK’s most downloaded app last year, is fueling a 'social contagion' of pressure on impressionable youngsters and the rise in teenagers who are identifying as trans."
And now in many instances public school teachers are very openly boasting on their private channels that they are going after the young in their classrooms and online. Or as Rod Dreher sarcastically describes, these are "proud groomer teachers"...

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1475353140471889920
.15 min
View: https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1471236515921465344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1475340721850916864%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es3_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Ftiktok-promoting-proud-groomer-teacher-videos

.29 min

People like this should be fired, rendered unemployable, and everyone like them should be terrified of having conversations about "gender and sexuality" with your kids behind your back because they would be next https://t.co/p2CAbYEoCK
— Pedro L. Gonzalez (@emeriticus) December 27, 2021

And more...

This is who you entrust your kids with. She gets her validation from 10 year olds saying the right pronoun pic.twitter.com/EQsaQeD415
— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) December 24, 2021

In Douglas Murray's landmark book The Madness of Crowds, he wrote about "the increasing number of concessions to any and all trans demands by figures in authority."



Murray observed that already in 2019... "In online culture it is not at all unusual for the taking of hormones to be turned into an absurdly easy and consequence-free exercise. On YouTube, Instagram and other sites there are countless people who say that they are trans and who push the idea that you might be too."

He noted in the book: "In such videos testosterone injections become known as 'T' or 'man juice'. Some of these people who are transitioning in real time become celebrities in their own right."

Kristin Pitzen, a teacher for @nmusd in Orange County, Calif., recorded herself on TikTok talking about how she took down the US flag & has her students pledge allegiance to the LGBTQ BLM trans flag. California teacher removes American flag, tells students to pledge allegiance to Pride flag instead
— Andy Ngô ️‍ (@MrAndyNgo) August 29, 2021

And back to Rod Dreher's commentary, he highlights the woefully underreported fact that...
TikTok signed a partnership earlier this year with Stonewall, the controversial lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights charity, to promote this material.

Dreher then underscores, "TikTok is owned indirectly by the Chinese government, which this year began restricting LGBT social media material for its own people. Make of this what you will."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

What To Do About A Government That's Always Watching Us

TUESDAY, DEC 28, 2021 - 05:04 PM
Authored by Mark Udall & Bob Goodlatte via RealClearPolitics.com,

Two University of Maryland professors recently announced they developed a software program called “Geneva” that can protect people from the pervasive surveillance of their online activities by repressive governments like the People’s Republic of China. This will help Chinese citizens, but it is no solution for them. China has created unprecedented surveillance networks in which cameras, facial recognition and artificial intelligence overseeing every communication and commercial transaction work together to create a startlingly clear portrait of more than 1 billion individuals in real time.



More than one writer refers to China as a “panopticon” – a technological update on the blueprint of a prison in which the guards always have line of sight on the prisoners, but the prisoners can never be sure when they are being watched. How far are we from a panopticon of our own in the United States?

Our federal government has a limitless appetite for ever more access to our information. A proposal bandied about on Capitol Hill earlier this year would report transactions in Americans’ bank accounts that cumulatively exceed $10,000. This plan would give the government warrantless and ready access regarding whomever we do business, befriend, which causes we support and aspects of our personal lives we’d rather keep to ourselves. If Congress should approve this financial snooping proposal, however, it would merely be one more step in taking away whatever privacy Americans still enjoy.

Consider: When you walk down the street, cell-site simulators, known as “stingrays,” permit the police to “spoof” your cellphone to scoop up your most personal data. At the federal level, at least 16 agencies are reported to be involved in such collections. The government at all levels also wields facial recognition technology that allows it to upload your visage to identify you and instantly amass your social media accounts and posts. At a glance, the government can know a great deal about your politics, religion and personal life.

When you sit down at a computer, the government can extract your emails, browsing history and social media activities enabled by no law, but by an executive order known as 12333. These activities are justified to combat terrorism, but the broad sweep of personal information from keyword searches goes well beyond the warrants and the need to search for particular facts required by the Fourth Amendment.

When you return from abroad, a customs agent can, without a warrant, insert a thumb drive into your laptop or smartphone to vacuum up your data. Because laws regulating how government collects your data were written before such devices were in wide use, agencies find new loopholes for every new technology.

And when the government wants to do so, it can purchase your most sensitive and personal information from data brokers. Even members of Congress are vulnerable to such intrusions. Two members had their private information and that of their families secretly accessed when the Trump administration required Apple to produce their data. Our organization, the Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability, filed a Freedom of Information Act request with an alphabet soup of federal intelligence and law enforcement agencies to see if government might be buying the private information of members of Congress from data brokers. We received only a series of non-response responses.

So for all the lurid – and accurate – stories about how the People’s Republic of China has become an Orwellian surveillance state, we would do well to also focus on threats closer to home. Americans are beginning to wake up to the extent to which technology and U.S. government policies are placing us in fishbowls. The good news is that there are ways champions of freedom in Congress can fight ubiquitous surveillance. In addition to voting down the IRS surveillance plan, Congress should embrace three initiatives:
  • First, Congress should pass The Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act, which would close the loophole that allows federal agencies to buy our private location data from apps or digital data brokers.
  • Second, a measure sponsored by Sens. Patrick Leahy and Mike Lee would subject the FBI’s warrant applications before the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court to the scrutiny of court-appointed experts in civil liberties.
  • Finally, Congress should hold hearings to discover the scale of 12333 surveillance.
We should not deceive ourselves, however, about how tough it will be to restore privacy to the American people. Much is happening because of our government’s limitless appetite for our information. The degradation of our privacy is also being driven by the relentlessly growing power of technology. But we should at least urge Congress to enact these three measures – or else we might soon need the Geneva software to protect us from our own government.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Taibbi: The Democrats' Education Lunacies Will Bring Back Trump

TUESDAY, DEC 28, 2021 - 10:36 AM
Authored by Matt Taibbi via TK News,

On Meet the Press Daily last week, Chuck Todd featured a small item about the 23 Democrats not planning on running for re-reelection to congress next year.

Todd guessed such a high number expressed a lack of confidence in next year’s midterms, and his guest, University of Virginia Center for Politics Director Larry Sabato, agreed. “This is just another indicator that Democrats will probably have a bad year in 2022,” said Sabato, adding, “They only have a majority of five. It’s pretty tough to see how they hold on.”


Education Secretary Miguel Cardona


On the full Meet the Press Sunday, Todd in an ostensibly unrelated segment interviewed 1619 Project author and New York Times writer Nikole Hannah-Jones about Republican efforts in some states to ban teaching of her work. He detoured to ask about the Virginia governor’s race, which seemingly was decided on the question, “How influential should parents be about curriculum?” Given that Democrats lost Virginia after candidate Terry McAuliffe said, “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what to teach,” Todd asked her, “How do we do this?”

View: https://youtu.be/PF6wuD9cJOo
17:12 min

Hannah-Jones’s first answer was to chide Todd for not remembering that Virginia was lost not because of whatever unimportant thing he’d just said, but because of a “right-wing propaganda campaign that told white parents to fight against their children being indoctrinated.” This was standard pundit fare that for the millionth time showed a national media figure ignoring, say, the objections of Asian immigrant parents to Virginia policies, but whatever: her next response was more notable. “I don’t really understand this idea that parents should decide what’s being taught,” Hannah-Jones said. “I’m not a professional educator. I don’t have a degree in social studies or science.”

I’m against bills like the proposed Oklahoma measure that would ban the teaching of Jones’s work at all state-sponsored educational institutions. I think bans are counter-productive and politically a terrible move by Republicans, who undercut their own arguments against authoritarianism and in favor of “local control” with such sweeping statewide measures. Still, it was pretty rich hearing the author of The 1619 Project say she lacked the expertise to teach, given that a) many historians agree with her there, yet b) she’s been advocating for schools to teach her dubious work to students all over the country.

Even odder were her next comments, regarding McAuliffe’s infamous line about parents. About this, Hannah-Jones said:
We send our kids to school because we went our kids to be taught by people with expertise in the subject area… When the governor, or the candidate, said he didn’t think parents should be deciding what’s being taught in school, he was panned for that, but that’s just a fact.
In the wake of McAuliffe’s loss, the “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what to teach” line was universally tabbed a “gaffe” by media. I described it in the recent “Loudoun County: A Culture War in Four Acts” series in TK as the political equivalent of using a toe to shoot your face off with a shotgun, but this was actually behind the news cycle. Yahoo! said the “gaffe precipitated the Democrat’s slide in the polls,” while the Daily Beast’s blunter headline was, “Terry McAuliffe’s White-Guy Confidence Just ****ed the Dems.”

However, much like the Hillary Clinton quote about “deplorables,” conventional wisdom after the “gaffe” soon hardened around the idea that what McAuliffe said wasn’t wrong at all. In fact, people like Hannah-Jones are now doubling down and applying to education the same formula that Democrats brought with disastrous results to a whole range of other issues in the Trump years, telling voters that they should get over themselves and learn to defer to “experts” and “expertise.”

This was a bad enough error in 2016 when neither Democrats nor traditional Republicans realized how furious the public was with “experts” on Wall Street who designed horrifically unequal bailouts, or “experts” on trade who promised technical retraining that never arrived to make up for NAFTA job josses, or Pentagon “experts” who promised we’d find WMDs in Iraq and be greeted as liberators there, and so on, and so on. Ignoring that drumbeat, and advising Hillary Clinton to run on her 25 years of “experience” as the ultimate Washington insider, won the Democratic Party leaders four years of Donald Trump.

It was at least understandable how national pols could once believe the public valued their “professional” governance on foreign policy, trade, the economy, etc. Many of these matters probably shouldn’t be left to amateurs (although as has been revealed over and over of late, the lofty reputations of experts often turn out to be based mainly upon their fluidity with gibberish occupational jargon), and disaster probably would ensue if your average neophyte was suddenly asked to revamp, say, the laws governing securities clearing.

But parenting? For good reason, there’s no parent anywhere who believes that any “expert” knows what’s better for their kids than they do. Parents of course will rush to seek out a medical expert when a child is sick, or has a learning disability, or is depressed, or mired in a hundred other dilemmas. Even through these inevitable terrifying crises of child rearing, however, all parents are alike in being animated by the absolute certainty — and they’re virtually always right in this — that no one loves their children more than they do, or worries about them more, or agonizes even a fraction as much over how best to shepherd them to adulthood happy and in one piece.

Implying the opposite is a political error of almost mathematically inexpressible enormity. This is being done as part of a poisonous rhetorical two-step. First, Democrats across the country have instituted radical policy changes, mainly in an effort to address socioeconomic and racial disparities. These included eliminating standardized testing to the University of California system, doing away with gifted programs (and rejecting the concept of gifted children in general), replacing courses like calculus with data science or statistics to make advancement easier, and pushing a series of near-parodical ideas with the aid of hundreds of millions of dollars from groups like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that include things like denouncing emphasis on “getting the right answer” or “independent practice over teamwork” as white supremacy.

When criticism ensued, pundits first denied as myth all rumors of radical change, then denounced complaining parents as belligerent racists unfit to decide what should be taught to their children, all while reaffirming the justice of leaving such matters to the education “experts” who’d spent the last decade-plus doing things like legislating grades out of existence. This “parents should leave ruining education to us” approach cost McAuliffe Virginia, because it dovetailed with what parents had long been seeing and hearing on the ground.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Angry Women Who Harassed Male Students at ASU Multicultural Center Are Found Guilty – Now Claim They Are Being Persecuted

By Jim Hoft
Published December 29, 2021 at 4:00pm
black-women-asu-harassing-students.jpg

Back in September two multicultural women approached two young white men at an ASU student center and started screaming at them in public while they were studying.

The two angry women were insulted that one of the students would have a “police matter” sticker on the back of his computer.


So they screamed at the white students while they were studying.

The white male students ended up leaving the center and continued their studying elsewhere.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1441202362073239553
2:20 min

The ASU campus released a statement following the incident.
@ASU has just responded in a statement describing the episode (in which white students were ejected from a multicultural center on account of their race) a “disagreement between a handful of students.” pic.twitter.com/YhPDFWacDB
— Gregg Re (@gregg_re) September 24, 2021

Since this incident went public the two angry women were found guilty of harassing the white male students. They were told to write an essay about how to treat people they disagree with.

Now they have a new video about how ASU officials are like Nazis for daring to discipline them.

The angry women say they are being persecuted.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1476156194330853376
1:09 min
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Doug Casey On How Marxists Captured The Universities And Will Soon Capture The Nation

WEDNESDAY, DEC 29, 2021 - 06:50 PM
Authored by Doug Casey via InternationalMan.com,

International Man: Communist and socialist ideas are growing in popularity among the millennial and Gen Z generations. In fact, the majority of young people dislike capitalism and favor a more socialist or even a communist economic system.

This is evidenced by the rise of politicians like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (AOC) and The Squad.

What’s your take on this?


Doug Casey: The youth are being corrupted, and it’s more serious than ever. Although I say that a bit tongue-in-cheek since people have probably thought the youth were becoming degenerate since about day one.

For instance, one of the two charges against Socrates when he was executed in Ancient Greece was corrupting the youth. Older people always think the youth are foolish, ignorant, lazy, crazy and generally taking the world to hell in a handbasket. And, of course, many of their charges are, and always have been, true.

But as kids get older, they generally get wiser, more knowledgeable, harder-working, and more prudent—nothing new here. The world has survived roughly 250 new generations since civilization began in Sumer 5,000 years ago. And it will likely survive this one too.

That’s the bright side. And, as you know, I always look on the bright side. But, on the other hand, the American university system has been totally captured by Cultural Marxists, socialists, statists, collectivists, promoters of identity politics, and people of that ilk. These people hate Western Civilization and its values and are actively trying to destroy them. My view is that this challenge is perhaps the most serious we’ve ever encountered, and the dangers are greatly amplified by advancing technology.

International Man: What role are Western universities playing? How is this shaping current and future generations?

Doug Casey: Universities have been totally transformed in many ways over the past century, and it’s been for the worst in every instance. When the average 18-year-old goes to college, he knows very little about how the world works in general. He’s got vague ideas he picked up mostly from TV, movies, and people who got a job teaching high school. They know basically nothing about economics, government, or history. Worse, what they think they know is mostly wrong.

That makes them easy prey for professors with totally bent views to indoctrinate them.

It’s not so much that they’re taught inaccurate facts. There are plenty of “factoids” (artificial facts), of course—like the War Between the States (which shouldn’t be called the Civil War) was mainly fought to free the slaves. Or that Keynesian economics is correct. Or that the US is a democracy ruled by “We the People.” And many, many more. But that’s just part of the problem.

It’s not just the factoids they’re taught. It’s the way the schools interpret actual facts and the kind of meaning they infuse into events. The “why?” of events is twisted, and concepts of good and evil are perverted. The education system has been almost completely captured by Marxists and other leftists. They’re in a position to indoctrinate the youth, and they use that power to the maximum.

Once a kid’s thoughts are bent—much the way a tree can be bent as a sapling—in one direction or another, it’s very hard to straighten them out.

Of course, that leads to the question of whether the youth should be directed one way or another in the first place. Which values are “right” or “wrong?” I certainly have views on that subject, but this isn’t the place to go into them—beyond saying that basic values are too important to be left to random government employees.

The real problem, however, is that today’s education does not teach critical thinking. Rather just the opposite is true. Students are taught blind acceptance of what’s currently considered politically correct.

Instead of questioning authority in a peaceful and rational manner—which is what Socrates did—the current idea is to prevent any divergent views from even being discussed. The professors are basically all socialists, and the kids tend to believe what they’re taught. Those views are reinforced by the other sources of information surrounding them—Hollywood, mass media, and the government itself.

Destructive ideas usually start with “intellectuals.” Intellectuals typically despise business, commerce, and production, and they envy the money the capitalists have. Intellectuals feel they’re not only smarter but also much more moral than business people. That gives them the right, in their own eyes, to dictate to everyone else. They’re usually socialists, and approve of “cadres” like themselves, ordering everyone else around. Intellectuals naturally gravitate to the universities, where they’re paid to hang out with each other, be lionized by kids, and hatch goofy ideas.

This has always been the case. But it’s become a much bigger problem than in the past, partly because a much, much higher percentage of kids go to college now than ever before. Even in the recent past, at most five or 10 percent of kids went to college. These days, almost everybody goes, and a much higher proportion of the youth are being infected with leftist memes than ever before.

Some kids will grow out of it and realize that most of what they’ve paid an exorbitant amount of money to learn is nonsense. But most will reflexively defend what they were taught in the cocoon. And I’m afraid those people now make up a big chunk of the U.S. population.

Kids who are polled say that they think socialism is good.. I suspect the polls are accurate. And even if they don’t think it, almost all of them feel it—although few know the difference between thinking and feeling … If you’re brought up thinking that the values of socialism and the welfare state are good, and everyone around you believes in them, the chances are you will too.

International Man: What are your thoughts on the emphasis on identity politics and the concept of “white privilege?”

Doug Casey: Identity politics is essentially the idea that a person is first and foremost a member of some race or ethnicity and only secondarily an individual. In recent years, most people have been indoctrinated indirectly and directly, subtly and overtly, to believe white people and the civilization they created are bad. The meme is everywhere. They’ve come to believe Western Civilization is a bad thing and that white people are destroying the world.

Even if they don’t want to believe it because the concept is so stupid and so utterly contrafactual, they end up accepting it just because they’ve heard it over and over. Propaganda works. Memes that originated with intellectuals in universities have thoroughly infiltrated the mass media and the entertainment industry. It’s perverse how today’s “thought leaders” overwhelmingly think the same thing.

There’s been no defense at all—forget about a counterattack—from so-called capitalists and business leaders. All they’re interested in is making money. In fact, they not only accept the ideas but contribute money to the causes of their enemies, idiotically thinking that virtue-signaling will placate them. It’s an unfortunate fact that business people, especially the suits managing large corporations, don’t really care how they make money. They tend to be completely amoral or immoral philistines and political hacks. They look like hypocrites and are (correctly) held in contempt by the intellectuals. The corporate types are happy to work with and for their counterparts in government, which is exactly what the fascism of Mussolini advocated. They self-righteously make charitable contributions to universities and NGOs, subsidizing the source of the poison.

There’s almost no defense of the ideas that brought us Western Civilization, which is responsible for just about everything that’s good in the world. I’m not kidding when I make that assertion. With the exception of a few anomalies like Taoism, martial arts, yoga, and Oriental cooking, East minus West equals zero.

Without it, the whole world would resemble Africa, Cambodia, or Mongolia—not even today, but 200 years ago. Ideas like individualism, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, science, rationality, and capitalism are products of Western Civilization. These concepts no longer have any defenders anywhere. They’re under attack everywhere.

International Man: What do you think the impact of this will be on the markets and the economy?

Doug Casey: I’m bearish, especially for the near term since actual Jacobins are in charge in Washington.

How can the markets be healthy when what passes for a ruling class in the West actually hate themselves and middle class is collapsing economically and psychologically? When, political entrepreneurship is valued more than making money through production, When the currency is being actively destroyed to prop up what has become a very corrupt political system?

In fact, the economy and the markets are the least of our problems. The very foundation of civilization itself is under attack. The widespread acceptance of destructive statist and collectivist ideas is serious. The consequences will be the same here as they were in Russia under the Soviets, in Germany under the Nazis, and in China under Mao. The situation may be even more serious since the idea of Western Civilization itself is under serious attack in the U.S., which has been the bulwark for the last century.

So, excuse my bearishness, but I think it’s warranted.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Charlie Kirk, Alex Marlow, James Lindsay Discuss How Queer Theory Is ‘The Gateway to Hell’ on ‘The Charlie Kirk Show’
Charlie Kirk, Dr. James Lindsay, Alex Marlow discuss CRT and Queer Theory for Charlie Kirk Podcast.

Matt Perdie/Breitbart News
ALANA MASTRANGELO29 Dec 202137

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, Breitbart News editor-in-chief Alex Marlow, and author and mathematician Dr. James Lindsay talked about how leftist doctrines like Queer Theory are “the gateway to hell” in a recent episode of The Charlie Kirk Show.

During the podcast episode, which included a panel featuring the trio at TPUSA’s recent AmeriaFest conference in Phoenix, Arizona, Lindsay explained that Critical Race Theory is a “funnel into Queer Theory.” Lindsay said:
This is what Mao Zedong did, he separated the culture into five categories that were considered red, for communist, and five categories that were considered black, for being bad. And he gave people black identities and a pathway to become a red guard by joining a red identity.
Lindsay went on to explain that Critical Race Theory operates in a similar manner, and white children in schools are able to gain their red cards so long as they lose their sense of their own identity.

“So if you’re white, you have a black racial cultural identity under Critical Race Theory, but if you become gender fluid, you have a red one now,” he said. “This is Mao’s education program from 1966 remade in America, and it worked.”

Lindsay continued:
Queer and Queer Theory means an identity without an essence. You will not know who you are, you will not grow up well, and you are going to have some weird 18-syllable sexuality, different romantic orientation, and 12 genders, and you’re going to come home, and you’re going to tell your parents, “You don’t understand what it’s like.”

And the family is broken. One generation to the next it split. And you’re going to not know who you are, and you’re going to be manipulatable, and you’re going to break away from your religion.

Christianity says God created man and woman, and they’re meant to be partners and compliments. So Christianity doesn’t get it, so the kids reject Christianity. Queer Theory is the gateway to hell.
Marlow added that Critical Race Theory is:
…also a distraction from the fact that so many of the solutions to the problems in this country right now are actually found in documents we can read and talk about today, our founding documents, the federalist papers, the Bible, the Judeo-Christian values that our country was founded on.
“There are answers for us here,” he said. “And we cannot read them or talk about them, because we have to do so much defense against gender queer theory, and whether or not you’re a terrorist because you don’t like men using the women’s bathroom.”

“That is the whole trick, and the road is to dismantle the foundation of this country,” Marlow affirmed. “That is the direction this is heading if we don’t start changing the conversation right now.”

You can listen to the full episode of The Charlie Kirk Show here.
 
Last edited:

Toosh

Veteran Member
I can't help but think they are very very nervous. They know they lied. They know they cheated. They know that we know. They know that sooner or later we will have had enough of this. They know we greatly out number them. They know we have no questions about which bathroom to use.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

What Would Norman Rockwell Paint For 2021?


tito-texidor-iii-8Xp9nsYs8u8-unsplash.jpg

This holiday season, I’ve used my downtime to reflect on the events of the past year. We have much to be thankful for, despite the issues we’ve faced. We are all recipients of God’s blessings. Those blessings include our God-given rights as enshrined in our Constitution. But events of the past year have shown us to be on a dangerous path. Men with small minds seem determined to challenge the gifts granted us by our maker.

One such gift is the right to express ourselves. It was famously depicted by Norman Rockwell in his painting, “Freedom of Speech.” The painting became world-famous when it was used on the cover of the Saturday Evening Post in February of 1943. It depicted a lone man, still in his dirty clothes from a hard day at work, standing up to local city officials to express his disagreement with their plans. The painting is a powerful statement. In America, every citizen, regardless of social status, has a right to be heard and treated with courtesy and respect.

How would Norman Rockwell have depicted 2021? Would the lone speaker be standing tall and confident, knowing that he would suffer no retribution for his words? Or would the artist somehow depict his emotions, knowing that he is placing himself at great personal risk of being canceled from his livelihood and social associations?

If the painting were done in 2021, would the police be handcuffing the speaker? The past twelve months have shown that daring to speak “truth to power” can get one charged with creating a public disturbance — even in a forum created to entertain dissenting voices.

In a modern-day version of the painting, would the speaker be surrounded by fellow citizens listening respectfully to his words? Or would Mr. Rockwell find a way to depict him surrounded by FBI informants?

Would our speaker find himself under investigation by the DoJ? He is challenging government authority. Haven’t we been told that such actions are seditious — essentially calls to insurrection?

How would Rockwell artistically represent that the speaker’s own government would “threat tag” him as a potential domestic terrorist in its tracking database?

In 21st-century America, our government collects, organizes, and shares information on such subversives.

No modern-day depiction of freedom of speech would be complete without a mob of black-clad, club-wielding youths waiting for the speaker outside the building. In modern America, wrongthink must be corrected. Antifa and BLM stand ready to render such lessons — with the tacit approval of our government.

Our freedom of speech is not granted by our government or our Constitution. It is granted by our maker. Our Constitution prescribes that our government is to protect our freedom. It’s safe to say that our government has strayed from that mission. We have been slow to see the threat to our liberties and allowed the left to infiltrate our institutions.
  • Education
  • Government bureaucracy
  • Media
  • Law enforcement
  • Medicine
But our eyes are open now, and a reckoning is approaching. The left is playing with forces it does not understand. Many have tried to suppress our rights in the past. All have failed. American patriots have always refused subjugation. Do leftists really think they can succeed this time with an army of pajama boys — who need to retreat to the nearest safe space every time they read a mean tweet? Or perhaps the left thinks the military will be agreeable with the oppression of Americans. That would be the same military that is more focused on Critical Race Theory and transgender issues than combat readiness. Good luck with that.

Unintended consequences are usually just unforeseen consequences. When people with small minds and great ambition lack the foresight to see the consequences of their actions, things happen that they don’t expect. Leftists needs to stop for a moment and give their actions some serious thought. If they would rather oppress than debate us, the consequences may not be what they expect.

By John Green

Freedom_of_Speech__-_NARA_-_513536.jpg
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Ungracious - And Their Demonization of the Past
.
By Victor Davis Hanson
December 30, 2021

The last two years have seen an unprecedented escalation in a decades-long war on the American past. But there are lots of logical flaws in attacking prior generations in U.S. history.

Critics assume their own judgmental generation is morally superior to those of the past. So, they use their own standards to condemn the mute dead who supposedly do not measure up to them.

Yet 21st-century critics rarely acknowledge their own present affluence and leisure owe much to history's prior generations whose toil helped create their current comfort.

And what may future scolds say of the modern generation that saw over 60 million abortions since Roe v. Wade, even as fetal viability outside the womb continued to progress to ever earlier ages?

What will our grandchildren say of us who dumped on them over $30 trillion in national debt - much of it as borrowing for entitlements for ourselves?

What sort of society snoozes as record numbers of murders continue in 12 of its major cities? What is so civilized about defunding the police, endemic smash-and-grab thefts, and car jackings?

Was our media more responsible, professional, and learned in 1965 or 2021? Did Hollywood make more sophisticated and enjoyable films in 1954 or 2021? Was there less or more sportsmanship among professional athletes in 1990 or 2021?

Was it actually moral to discard the "content of our character" and "equal opportunity" principles of the prior Civil Rights movement of 60 years ago? Are their replacement fixations on the "color of our skin" and "equality of result" superior?

Would America have won World War II with the current labor participation rate of only six in 10 Americans working? Would our generation have brought all American troops home and quit World War I in fear of the deadly 1918 Spanish flu pandemic?

Are we proud that most standardized tests of student knowledge and achievement continue to decline, despite record investments in education?

Do we ever pause to consider that we enjoy our modern standard of living and security because we were once a meritocracy that quit judging our workforce by tribal affinities and ancient prejudices?

Our generation talks of infrastructure nonstop. But when was the last time it built anything comparable to the Hoover Dam, the interstate highway system, or the California Water Project - much less sent a man back to the moon or beyond?

If prior generations were so toxic, why do we continue to take for granted the moral and material world they bequeathed to us, from the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to our airports, freeways, and power plants? Did we ever defeat anything comparable to the Axis powers or Soviet communism?

We know the symptoms of the current epidemic of hating the past.

One is Orwellian renaming and statue-toppling. Historical revision often responds to puritanical mob frenzies rather than to democratic discussion and votes of relevant elected officials.

Where is the pantheon of woke heroes who will replace the toppled or defaced Thomas Jefferson and Teddy Roosevelt?

Whose morality and achievement should instead be immortalized? Were the public and private lives of Che Guevara, Angela Davis, Malcolm X, Margaret Sanger, and Franklin D. Roosevelt without sin?

Racial fixations tend predictably in one direction. In good Confederate fashion, we lump all individuals who look alike into inexact collectives of "white," "black," or "brown" - often to stereotype the supposed evils of so-called white supremacy.

But if we go down that tribalist and simplistic road of caricatured oppressors and oppressed, will future generations tally up each group's merits and demerits, to adjudicate the roles of millions of individuals in making America worse or better?

What standard would they use to judge our ignorant world of racial stereotyping - proportional representation in Nobel Prizes, philanthropy, scientific breakthroughs, or lasting art, music, and literature versus statistics on homicides, assault, divorce, and illegitimacy?

Immigration - when legal, diverse, measured, and often meritocratic - has been the great strength of America, as typified by industrious arrivals who chose to abandon their own homeland to risk new lives in a foreign United States.

But if America is so flawed and so irredeemable, why in fiscal year 2021 are nearly 2 million foreigners now crashing its borders - illegally, en masse, and intent on reaching a supposedly racist nation that is purportedly inferior to those they abandon?

According to the ancient brutal bargain, assimilation and integration grant the immigrant as much claim to America's present and past as the native-born. But then shouldn't the antithesis also be true?

Shouldn't immigrants at least respect those of the past who created the very country they now so eagerly desire, and died in awful places from Valley Forge to Bastogne to preserve?

Never in history has such a mediocre, but self-important and ungracious generation owed so much, and yet expressed so little gratitude, to its now dead forebears.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Most Americans Don't Trust Teachers, Schools With Children's Gender Identity: Survey

THURSDAY, DEC 30, 2021 - 09:00 PM
Authored by Bill Pan via The Epoch Times,

A majority of Americans say that male and female are the only two genders, and that schools shouldn’t be allowed to counsel children about gender or sexuality without parents’ consent, according to the results of a survey released Monday.



The survey was conducted by Rasmussen Reports among 1,000 American adults from Dec. 21 to 22, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points at and 95 percent confidence level. It comes amid a social media firestorm sparked by Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, who was accused of engaging in “hate speech” for insisting that there are only two biologically distinct genders.
“Transgender activists have accused J.K. Rowling of ‘hate speech’ for saying it, but most Americans agree with the Harry Potter author that there are only two genders,” the report said.
Rasmussen asked participants whether they agree with the statement, “There are only two genders: male and female.”

The results show that 75 percent of them agreed with the statement, with 63 percent saying they “strongly” agree.

Those identifying as Republicans (82 percent) are more likely to strongly agree than Democrats (47 percent) and independent or unaffiliated respondents (60 percent). There are also more black (68 percent) than white respondents (63 percent) or those of other races (55 percent) who strongly agreed that there are only two genders.

When it comes to the schools and teachers’ role in shaping children’s view on gender, most respondents also said that they don’t want their children counseled by schools on their gender identity without their consent.

The survey asked whether schools and teachers should be “allowed to counsel students about their sexual and gender identity without parental knowledge or consent.” Overall, 69 percent of respondents said they don’t agree, compared to 19 percent that think it is okay.

Majorities of all political categories—80 percent of Republicans, 54 percent of Democrats, and 72 percent of independents—are opposed to schools counseling children on gender identity without informing parents.

The results of the survey echoed the frustration felt by a California mother who recently made national headlines after she tore into the local school board during a meeting, accusing two middle school teachers of “coaching” her gender dysphoric daughter into an LGBTQ club without her knowledge.

Jessica Konen of Salinas, California, went public with her story after controversy erupted over a leaked audio clip, in which two seventh-grade teachers from Buena Vista Middle School were recorded discussing with other teachers on how to hide from conservative parents that their children are participating in progressive LGBTQ activities.
“Because we are not official, we have no club rosters. We keep no records,” said one teacher, who is also an LGBTQ club leader.
“In fact, sometimes we don’t really want to keep records because if parents get upset that their kids are coming? We’re like, ‘Yeah, I don’t know. Maybe they came?’ You know, we would never want a kid to get in trouble for attending if their parents are upset.”
Konen told The Epoch Times that near the end of sixth grade, her daughter told her she might be “bisexual.” By the middle of the seventh grade, Konen was called to the school for a meeting, during which a teacher said her daughter was “trans fluid” and would be called by a new name and male pronouns and would be using the unisex restroom at school.

“You allow these teachers to open their classrooms, teaching predatorial information to a young child, a mindful child that doesn’t even know how to comprehend it all,” Konen said at the Dec. 15 meeting. “How do you not know what’s going on [on] your own campuses? Did you think that no parent would ever come forward? You will not quiet me today. I will stand here today and protect my child along with every other child who has not come forward yet.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

New York Gov. Hochul Declares Racism a ‘Public Health Crisis’
1
ALBANY, NEW YORK - AUGUST 11: Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul speaks during a press conference at the New York State Capitol on August 11, 2021 in Albany City. Lt. Gov. and incoming NY Gov. Kathy Hochul gave her first press conference after Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced that he will be …
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
JORDAN DIXON-HAMILTON30 Dec 2021137

Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY) signed legislation declaring racism a “public health crisis” in the state of New York.

“For far too long, communities of color in New York have been held back by systemic racism and inequitable treatment,” Hochul said. “I am proud to sign legislation that addresses this crisis head-on, addressing racism, expanding equity, and improving access for all.”

Hochul signed a package of legislation on December 23 containing six bills that declare the public health crisis and implement ways to address it. Legislation S.70-A/A.2230 enacted the hate crimes analysis and review act, which gives law enforcement guidelines for the collection and reporting of demographic data for hate crime victims and alleged perpetrators.

“The Hate Crimes Analysis and Review Act ensures that we collect accurate demographic data of perpetrators and victims to better protect the communities being targeted. Without data, the plight of many will remain invisible,” said state assembly member Karines Reyes.

Additionally, legislation S.6639-A/A.6896-A requires the state to collect certain demographic information “in order to keep a more accurate and relevant public record of Asian-American populations in New York.” Anti-Asian hate crimes in New York City reportedly increased by 361 percent over the past year.

Gov. Hochul is likely following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) lead. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky declared racism a “serious public health threat” in April.

“What we know is this: racism is a serious public health threat that directly affects the well-being of millions of Americans,” Walensky said. “As a result, it affects the health of our entire nation.”

Municipalities across the country began to declare racism a public health crisis in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death and last year’s Black Lives Matter protests.

The city council of Richmond, Virginia, declared racism a public health crisis in July. Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot did the same in her city in June, as well as the mayors of Boston and Louisville.

New York City beat the state to the punch when they declared racism a public health crisis in October.

Hochul was sworn in as New York’s governor in August after former Gov. Andrew Cuomo resigned amid allegations of sexual misconduct. Recent polls found Hochul is the leading candidate among Democrats for the 2022 governor’s race.

[COMMENT:

beating dead stick.gif
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

‘God and Cancel Culture’ Author Urges Americans To Pray, Stand Up Before It’s Too Late: ‘We Do Not Lose Our Constitutional Rights When There Is A Crisis In America’

By Alicia Powe
Published December 31, 2021 at 10:20am

We no longer look to North Korea, Iran, China, Russia, or third-world countries to find peaceful citizens with big fat targets on their backs.
America is in a war.

This time the enemy isn’t thousands of miles away on a distant battlefield or hiding in a cave.

It’s here and ruling over us, canceling, marginalizing, blacklisting, bankrupting and even coordinating federal entrapment of anyone threatening its power.


Even voicing dissent will soon be a criminal offense, if we proceed down this trajectory, author of “God and Cancel Culture” Steven Strang warned in an exclusive interview with The Gateway Pundit.

The political left proclaims to champion liberalism. In reality, its ideology is predicated on “socialism and communism, which is atheistic, which has always been against God,” the award-winning journalist explained. “There are secular people who never would have identified with me as a Christian, but they’re being attacked so much that it’s like we stick together as brothers.”

Strang, CEO of Charisma Media, examines a turn of events that are leading up to the nullification of the US Constitution in his new book “God and Cancel Culture,” and draws upon a lifetime of experience and outstanding interviews for insight into how to triumph over evil in this dark hour.

The left’s ability to galvanize the public into replacing faith in God with “wokeness” directly correlates to the tyrannical takeover we are witnessing unfold, he argued.

“It’s almost like wokeness is a religion – like a secular religion. They have certain sins – they have penalties for their sins. The only thing is that in their philosophy there is no way of redemption,” he said. “Christianity is about redemption. Even if you mess up, even if you do wrong, you can be redeemed through Jesus Christ.

“If you mess up with ‘woke’ people or if woke people aren’t woke enough, a lot of times they eat their own. There’s no redemption. It’s really sad. We do not want this to happen – we do not want our children and grandchildren to have to grow up in this kind of America.”

Social justice radicals have had a monopoly on popular culture for decades and the sore-loser leftwing mob has cried foul after every election that has resulted in a Republican victor.

As former President Trump began to successfully resurrect the American economy and culture from a communist stronghold, the effort perpetrated to stomp out patriotism rose to new heights as Big Tech, corporate giants, Democrats and many in the Republican ranks joined forces to “prevent another Trump situation.”

Suddenly, a bioweapon was unleashed that singlehandedly destroyed the reelection prospects of the America First leader, kill millions of innocent people and crush dissent.

The leftwing mob managed to cancel the will of the American people in 2020, Strang argued.

“If there’s fraud in one precinct in America, it ought to be investigated. We can’t have any, certainty about our elections,” he proclaimed. “Ballots in the middle of the night and all of them are for Biden and nobody down-ballot – I mean, that is fraud on its face! A fifth-grader could identify that as fraudulent. Nobody votes for Biden – not hundreds of ballots in a box in the middle of the night.

“But these people don’t care. They lie, steal and cheat. So if you prove they did all that and they don’t care. They know they’re doing it. As a journalist, I’ve always tried to be sort of reasonable and not an alarmist, but I’m very, very concerned what’s happened,” he continued. “The left is saying, ‘We won. You lost.

Sit down, shut up. And if you don’t shut up, we will cancel you – we’ll be sure that you can’t earn a living, that your name is mud. It used to be in Europe, in the Middle Ages, one group would fight the other, but back then they would cut off each others’ heads and shoot each other. Now it’s character assassination online.”

003.jpg


Strang, who has nearly 50 years of journalism experience and published thousands of books, witnessed election interference firsthand when corporate retail giants canceled his books “God, Trump And The 2020 Election” ahead of the steal.

“I tried to warn that if Trump did not win all these bad things were going to happen and sadly has come true. Amazon carried it and sold tens of thousands of that book. But then mysteriously in July, August, September, and October – running up to the election – they ordered zero copies. They took the buy button off and they said the book was ‘not available.’ They didn’t actually take it off,” he said. “We made calls and inquiries and asked what can be done and, ‘We’ll ship you the books and put the buy button on.’ Nothing.

“After the election, they put the buy button back, they bought a whole bunch of copies, and you can still buy it on Amazon. And that’s just a small way that I’ve been able to see with my own eyes. This cancel culture – what’s happening to Michael Lindell and, and a lot of other people is much, much, much worse.”

Amid the communist takeover, books about God are anathema for Walmart.
“Walmart, which has sold big numbers of all my other books, my books about Donald Trump, they’ve declined to carry this book [‘God and Cancel Culture’],” Strang revealed. “Is that a big deal? Well, it was to me.”

Even after using a bioweapon to hijack economies around the globe and steal the election, deep state bureaucrats and installed lawmakers continue to desperately perpetuate COVID “crisis” to implement a social credit system that flags, shuns, punishes, and eradicates political dissent.

You’re no longer a “racist” or “conspiracy theorist” for supporting the GOP, being a patriot, or defending your faith. Refusal to comply with illogic – like injecting yourself with gene therapy that could kill you or struggling to breathe in a germ-ridden mask – is outlawed in states across America. Even the creator of mRNA technology is ostracized and banished for presenting facts about the effects of his experiment.

“If there’s even a possibility that may be [Ivermectin] would help, doesn’t a person have a right to try it? Maybe it’ll help,” Strang charged. “It’s not going to kill them.”

The ban on medications that treat COVID coincided with a ban on churches during COVID that will ultimately, like in all dictatorships, will result in a ban on the belief in God unless The People stand up, he surmised.

“I’m concerned about how they’re suppressing Christianity. We have the first amendment, which is freedom of religion and churches were shut down because of a virus. We do not lose our constitutional rights when there is a crisis in America,” Strang said. “If you went to church, you could be a ‘super spreader’ and die of COVID. But you could go to a liquor store, a marijuana dispensary, or even Walmart and somehow that was okay – it’s insane. I document this and I talked to brave pastors in ‘God and Cancel Culture who stood up to this. If ever people needed the church, it was during a crisis. People were depressed. Parents were dying in hospitals, and they couldn’t even go visit them.

“These woke people – they want to stamp out Christianity. Some of them would make the Bible a hate book if they could get away with it. Thank God. We’re not that far. We’ve got to stand up.”

The woke agenda is being implemented at “warp speed” as our once free nation precipitously morphs into a dystopia that was incomprehensible just two years prior. But it’s not too late, Strang insists, because with faith in God all things are possible.

“People are waking up,” he concluded. “There are millions of people praying. Even as bad as things are now, we have to believe that God’s word is true. I document [in God and Cancel Culture] how some good things are happening – we’re seeing people turn to God. Young people are turning to God, but if you watch CNN or even Fox, you don’t even hardly think anybody goes to church, let alone somebody prays. At Charisma, we try to report that kind of thing.

“When things get so far, people get hopeless. There’s an empty spot in all of us that longs for God. Some people try to fill it with wokeness.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Goodbye, Standards – Hello, Progress: Virginia School District Proposes Banning Homework, Extra Credit, and Essentially Grades Altogether Thanks To “Unlimited Retakes”

By Julian Conradson
Published January 1, 2022 at 7:15am
Screenshot_20211231-225807_YouTube-913x479.jpg


The Arlington County School Board in Virginia recently introduced a proposal that would essentially eradicate the grading system as we know it.

According to Fox News, the proposal would force educators to allow their students an unlimited number of retakes on assignments, ban giving out extra credit, and would effectively eliminate homework completely by prohibiting it from being graded at all.

As justification for the radical changes, proponents of the new system claim that certain basic standards – like having late penalties in education – could potentially harm poor and minority children who they claim may not have access to resources necessary to complete assignments on time.


“Additionally, it has been suggested that students should not be graded on homework assignments because the fear of making mistakes will have a negative impact on their learning process,” Fox News added.

By every available definition, that is the epitome of ‘the soft bigotry of low expectations.’

Naturally, the proposal sparked outrage among parents whose children attend schools in Arlington County, but – somewhat surprisingly – even some of the traditionally-woke educators strongly opposed the ridiculous plan. Numerous teachers from the area slammed the proposal, saying that it would give children a blanket free pass while dramatically reducing the quality of education in the county.

Teachers at Wakefield High School in Virginia even sent a letter to the Arlington County Superintendent pushing back against the plan, calling it an outright “nightmare scenario” for teachers that would be detrimental to the students who are supposedly benefitting from the equal-opportunity grading system, according to Fox News.

From the letter:
“As educators with decades of experience in APS, we are extremely concerned with several changes proposed in the new grading and homework policy.
We believe that these changes will impact student learning and socio-emotional development and growth in a negative way. The changes, if implemented, will also result in the decline of high expectations and rigor in the classroom across all APS high schools.”

Finally, given the emphasis on equity in today’s education systems, we believe that some of the proposed changes will actually have a detrimental impact towards achieving this goal. Families that have means could still provide challenging and engaging academic experiences for their children and will continue to do so, especially if their child(ren) are not experiencing expected rigor in the classroom.

Students who come from families which are not as ‘savvy’ or ‘aware,’ will be subject to further disadvantage because they will not be held accountable for not completing their homework assignments and/or formative assessments according to the deadlines set by their teachers.

Such results are anything but equitableconversely, they offer our most needy students reduced probability of preparing for and realizing post-secondary opportunities.”
A spokesperson for Arlington Public Schools told Fox News that the district is still in the process of evaluating current policies, which is a multi-phased process that will take months. A final decision on this policy should be made when the School Board convenes in May.

From Fox News:
“‘This work is being done as part of the School Board’s work to update all policies and PIPs,’ a spokesperson said. ‘As of right now, we are having preliminary conversations with instructional staff as to what makes sense in policy and what makes sense in practice at schools.’

There are two phases of the process before the School Board is scheduled to act on any recommendations in May. As part of Phase1, we provided some ideas for staff to look at as a starting point and asked all Instructional Lead Teachers to gather feedback from school-based staff on the first working drafts. This is the first of several opportunities for all teachers to provide feedback. Selected staff from each building will also participate directly in the revision process in Phase 2.'”
In other words, there is still time to ensure this radical policy never sees the light of day. If you are a concerned parent in Arlington whose kids attend a school in the district and want to attend any upcoming school board meetings or contact them directly, you can do so here.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Democrat Strategist: ‘Cynical Elites and Politicians’ Divide Democrats and Republicans
22
American Constitution with US Flag. Focus on document with stars and stripes in background.
alancrosthwaite/ iStock / Getty Images Plus
HANNAH BLEAU1 Jan 202276

Democrat strategist Justin Horwitz told Breitbart News Saturday that he has found that Republicans and Democrats have far more in common than it seems, but “cynical elites and politicians,” as well as fringe activists and corporate media outlets, have made it seem as if the opposite is true, all for personal gain.

“What we found is after having these conversations — with Republicans, with people we thought we really don’t agree with or have huge differences with — we’re finding that we have a lot more in common than anybody realizes,” Horwitz told Breitbart News Saturday.

“And frankly we have cynical elites and politicians who are trying to weaponize our differences in order to focus on what divides us rather than what unites us, and I really do believe it’s that simple, that we agree on most issues,” he said, explaining that the media “weaponizes” and magnifies differences, “whether it be race, ethnicity, socio-economic class — that that really is the root of our disunity in many ways.”

When asked to elaborate on what these elites are weaponizing, specifically, to divide the country, he used a strong border as an example.

“I really do believe that both Democrats and Republicans believe in a strong border, southern and northern. Right? That we are a nation of laws,” he said.

“When Trump stands on stage and he says, ‘We are a nation of laws. We need a border,’ he’s not wrong.”

However, the problem, Horwitz said, is “cynical absolutists” in both parties. Far-left democrats, for example, will say the entire concept of a border is racist, which Horwitz noted is false. The Democrat strategist added that a majority of Democrats he talks to say a strong border is not controversial, but activists on the fringe are making the most noise, making it seem as if that is a majority view.

“You literally have a few fringe actors who are making all of the noise” on both sides, he said, noting that the “forgotten man” is not being properly represented.

LISTEN:
Breitbart · Justin Horwitz – January 1, 2022

https://soundcloud.com/breitbart%2Fjustin-horwitz-january-1-2022 View: https://soundcloud.com/breitbart/justin-horwitz-january-1-2022
15:51 min
Another issue both sides agree with, he said, is addressing crime, using Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s (D) Chicago as a prime example.

Calling Lightfoot a “disgrace” and perhaps the “worst mayor in the history of Chicago,” Horwitz said Chicago serves as another example of fringe leftists muddying the waters, as the majority of the city knows what the issues are.

“But then you have all these cynical activists making all the noise again, right?

And they’re saying defund defund defund and that’s all the police hear, and it’s demoralizing them,” he explained.

He believes the Democrat Party needs to stand up to the fringe and say they do not have room for such rhetoric, particularly now. Lightfoot, who will require people to show both a vaccination card and a driver’s license before entering an indoor restaurant, is “everything wrong with the Democratic Party,” he added.

Those fringe opinions, Horwtiz said, continue to get magnified as each side attacks them for tactical reasons, weaponizing the most extreme in both parties.

“It gets us both thinking that we have way more — our differences are too great to reconcile, when in reality it couldn’t be further from the truth,” Horwitz remarked, attributing the seeming divide to the failure of corporate media and “careerist politicians who cynically weaponize things like identity for personal gain.” That is why he started having these conversations in the first place, which have made him realize that Democrats and Republicans have more in common than widely believed.

Nonetheless, Horwitz said he has received pushback for daring to have these conversations and engage with people across the aisle.

“Have you even listened to Breitbart? Have you ever even read the reporting outside of what CNN has clipped?” he says to his critics, and expressed the importance of both sides holding every politician accountable, asserting that it would be far more effective.

“What you need is a true working-class, bipartisan grassroots movement to hold our politicians accountable so they start working for We the People for the first time in the last 50 years,” he said.

“I won’t bend or fold to a group of loud activists who say ‘Don’t engage with other people in your country who disagree with you.’ That’s madness,” he added.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Canada)


Pastor Artur Pawlowski and his Brother Dawid Arrested after Peaceful Protest Outside of Minister of Health’s Home – No Dissent Allowed (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published January 1, 2022 at 8:54pm

artur-pastor-pawlowski-arrest.jpg

Artur Pawlowski, the Pastor of the Cave of Adullam Church in Calgary, Alberta, Canada was swarmed by police and arrested in May 2021 after holding an “illegal” church service on that Saturday.

You may remember Pawlowski was the brave Canadian Christian Pastor who shouted down police officers who interrupted his church service during Holy Week.
“Out of this property you Nazis! Gestapo is not allowed here!” he shouted to police officers interrupting his church service during Easter weekend. “Out, Nazi! Out! Nazis are not welcome here! Do not come back here you Nazi psychopaths!”
Here is the video:
View: https://youtu.be/ziWXH7T15zw
2:20 min

On Saturday night, New Year’s Day, Pastor Pawlowski and his brother Dawid were arrested after a peaceful protest outside of Minister of Health Jason Coppin’s home in Alberta, Canada.

Here is the breaking video:
View: https://youtu.be/DabAiGyt2G8
7:22 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Wants To 'Woke' Up Your Doctor

SUNDAY, JAN 02, 2022 - 02:40 PM
Authored by Wesley Smith, op-ed via The Epoch Times,

The Biden Administration wants to pay doctors to create office “anti-racism plans” that could soon bring full blown critical race theory into your examining room...



What’s that you say? You didn’t hear about Congressional legislation to that effect? That’s because there is no such law. Rather, the idea was pushed quietly into implementation by the blob-like federal bureaucracy that exercises primary control over the details and minutia of federal law.

Despite what you may have been taught in high school government class, federal statutes do not provide the specifics that will apply once a bill becomes law.

Instead, legislation merely establishes a skeleton outline, usually directing the Secretary of this or that Department to write the details after the bill has passed through the arcane rule making process. In other words, the contemporary administrative state run by the executive branch has substantial quasi-legislative authority never dreamed of by our Founding Fathers.

There are few limitations to rule making other than that the regulation must be relevant to, and consistent with, the governing statue. But laws are often so vaguely written, that isn’t difficult. Moreover, the promulgated rules are where the devil in the details of federal law is to be found.

How do we know what has been proposed or promulgated by the bureaucrats?

All rules—whether preliminary or finalized—are published in a gargantuan volume called the Federal Register.

Oh good. That means we can just look them up, right?

Well, sure: In theory. But good luck trying. Each year more than 70,000 pages of very small print are published in the FR. Imagine digging through that eye-glazing text! Talk about needles and haystacks.

Yes, there is a modicum of societal input in rule making. But it is very indirect.

When a new rule is proposed, time is allowed for public comments that—in theory and sometimes in fact—influence the bureaucrats who write and promulgate the rule. Bureaucrats may also attend meetings with “stake holders” about the contents of proposed rules.

But like everything else in Washington, D.C., this administrative process is highly political. Whether commenters have any impact on the final rule usually depends on their political clout and/or whether they are allies of the sitting administration, not policy acumen. Needless to say, individual citizens rarely know what is going on, much less, have a meaningful chance to directly participate in the process.

Alright, enough dismal civics.
Here is what the new rules on Medicare payments to doctors—that begins on page 64996 of the 2021 FR and ends on page 66031—states about the anti-racism plan bonus: In Appendix 2—are your eyes rolling back in your head yet?—doctors are offered a percentage of their Medicare income “to create and implement an anti-racist plan.”

Among other consequences, this means establishing an anti-racist bureaucracy within physicians’ offices (my emphasis):
“The plan should include a clinic-wide review of existing tools and policies, such as value statements or clinical practice guidelines, to ensure that they include and are aligned with a commitment to anti-racism and an understanding of race as a political and social construct, not a physiological one.”
In other words, the rule states quite specifically that the plan isn’t about medicine. And it isn’t about science. Rather, it furthers naked ideology and insinuating very woke politics into the clinical setting.

That isn’t all:
“The plan should also identify ways in which issues and gaps identified in the review can be addressed and should include target goals and milestones for addressing prioritized issues and gaps …. The … eligible clinician or practice can also consider including in their plan ongoing training on anti-racism and/or other processes to support identifying explicit and implicit biases in patient care and addressing historic health inequities experienced by people of color.”
Think of the money to be made by leftist anti-racist trainers and organizers, which is part of the point.

Moreover, the call for “anti-racism” could be interpreted as calling for discrimination in medical settings against people who are not of color. For example, Ibram X. Kendi, the intellectual leader of the Anti-Racist Movement wrote in his book “How to Be an Anti-Racist,” “The only remedy to racial discrimination is antiracist discrimination.”

This invidious thinking has seeped into the medical establishment. Consider a relevant advocacy column entitled “Advancing President Biden’s Equity Agenda,” published last April in the New England Journal of Medicine. “To promote equity,” psychiatrist Neil K. Aggarwal wrote, “the Biden administration should distribute resources differentially in order to benefit groups that are persistently disadvantaged.”

That would be to pit some of us against others of us in our own doctor’s office. This obsession with differences—ever more thinly sliced—isn’t healthy. And it isn’t right.

All patients should be treated equally. No patient should be considered “favored” or “disfavored.” Everyone should receive optimal care. But such equality isn’t within the value system that “anti-racism” generally—and the new rule, specifically—promotes.

It is no surprise that the Biden administration has gone woke. But the real danger against true equality isn’t in the president’s speeches but in the power of the bureaucracy swamp. Indeed, what other “equity” landmines are being laid quietly within the hundreds of thousands of pages of the Federal Register?

Today, the bureaucrats are offering doctors a bonus to enlist in the “anti-racism” cause. Tomorrow, they may make critical race theory mandatory in the medical office. And we probably won’t know until the deed is done. This much is sure: Pushing “equity” in healthcare is a prescription for tearing this country apart.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Alex Marlow: TikTok Is a Chinese Weapon Pointed at American Kids to Distract Them
28
A teenager presents a smartphone with the logo of Chinese social network Tik Tok, on January 21, 2021 in Nantes, western France. (Photo by LOIC VENANCE / AFP) (Photo by LOIC VENANCE/AFP via Getty Images)
LOIC VENANCE/AFP via Getty Images
ROBERT KRAYCHIK3 Jan 202249

Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow and World Editor Frances Martel both described TikTok, a video-sharing app owned by Chinese company ByteDance, as a “foreign weapon” targeting American children and youth on Monday’s edition of the Breitbart News Daily podcast.

TikTok’s displacement of Google as the world’s most popular website, Marlow held, is illustrative of a broader displacement of America’s global position by China. He warned of TikTok and other digital apps’ capacities to obstruct personal development with time-wasting endeavors.

He remarked, “I was floored by the data that TikTok is now even more popular than Google around the world as the most popular domain. Not only is TikTok run by the Beijing Communist Party, but it’s also something that is wildly distracting, and it seems to be custom-built to distract young Americans from doing anything productive, and just to get sucked into this black hole of staring at your screen all day doing stupid stuff.”

TikTok’s overtaking Google as the world’s most popular domain relates to American decline, Marlow determined. “It struck me as maybe the beginning of the end of American domination around the world, and I hate to be grave about it, but I think someone needs to be. If we keep doing this – wasting millions upon millions of hours – every year staring at these screens – are we going to be able to process exactly how scary the world can be?”

Martel replied, “TikTok is terrifying, because it’s a weapon targeted at the youngest Americans, and a lot of Americans are too busy trying to juggle two or three jobs to really stare at every single thing that their kid is watching on their computer, and that’s not their fault. That’s the fault of the non-Big Tech globalists that are making it impossible for you to sustain yourself on one salary, so you have to hustle with Uber or whatever and you’re not paying attention to your kids, and that’s where TikTok comes in.”

Children with busy parents are uniquely vulnerable to being cognitively damaged by TikTok, Martel warned.

She said TikTok “has essentially supplanted significant parts of parenting, so that’s really scary, because it hurts concentration. There’s a lot of creative energy in America that’s being poured into this, like people dancing with little captions that mean nothing.

She concluded, “TikTok — and social media, generally — are something that we need greater collective effort to combat, because it’s clearly a foreign weapon.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

MSNBC’s Joy Reid Bashes Joe Rogan And ‘Selfish’ White Christian Conservatives (VIDEO)

By The Scoop
Published January 4, 2022 at 9:00pm
Screen-Shot-2022-01-04-at-11.00.52-am-1200x675-1.jpg


On Monday, MSNBC host Joy Reid attacked white Christian Conservatives, Joe Rogan, and alternative social media platform, Gettr.

Reid said, “there are white so-called Christian conservatives who feel like this country was built by them for them, and so everyone but them needs to suck it up and let them have their way or else.”

She continued, “their party, the Republicans, have gone from pretending to be the party of personal responsibility to unmasking themselves as the party of selfish people that cannot play well with others.”

Reid then bashed Conservatives for attempting to create alternative social media platforms like Gettr: “And they even have their own cable networks plus something called GETTR, which kind of sounds like porn. Moving on…”

She then named Conservatives equated Conservatives to be “special citizens.”

Reid bashed anti-maskers, saying they say things like, “‘I don’t want to wear a mask, and if you try to attack me, I’ll attack the low-waged clerks at the store or at the Burger King. I don’t want to get the vaccine either. If people get sick from me, oh well, not my problem.’”

Next, she came after Joe Rogan, who refuses to label himself as a Republican or a Christian. Reid said, “‘Joe Rogan said it’s fine. My kids aren’t going to mask up to protect those other kids. F those other kids, their parents are probably commies anyway.’ Which usually means people who want rights for other people and who give a damn what happens to them.”

She concluded by saying, “this midterm election year, we’re going to find out which brand of citizenship is stronger, and the answer will tell us whether our democracy is strong enough to survive.”

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1478482620774330376
3:16 min
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Compromise with the Left is Nearing the Impossible
Consensus with those on the Left is akin to national suicide

Dec-6-48x48.jpg

January 4, 2022
By
Jeff Davidson

Years ago, I leaned left on many issues of the day. Today, I find that a panoply of liberal or Leftist viewpoints, from no need for voter ID, to restrictions on the 1st Amendment, to be harmful to society. The questionable lockdowns over COVID-19, and their willingness to overlook street violence, enhances my view that that Left loves the idea of total authority and forevermore imposing its will on all of us.

No Way, No How

Is it okay to teach children that there are more than 50 genders? Do you believe, as Leftists do, for example, that children may choose their gender? Do you think that cross-dressers should be reading to children at story hour? Should mathematics, the sciences, and other core academic disciplines be taught to accommodate ‘politically diverse’ points of view?

Are you fine with colleges holding separate graduation exercises and celebrations for different ethnic minorities? Should entire college curricula be redesigned because most of the great works of literature throughout history have been written by white males?

Should student loans be exonerated? Should colleges set up safe spaces? Are you upset when conservative speakers on campus are disrupted from speaking, or are even banned from campus? Curiously, can a university promise students an unbiased education when 97% of college professors’ political donations go to Democrats?

Over the Top
Should Medicare be provided for all and, if so, how do you pay for it? Is late trimester abortion acceptable? After a baby is born, is it the right of the mother and the doctor to choose whether or not that person will continue to live?

Should we have open borders, and let in anyone who wants to come here? Are illegal immigrants to be given free healthcare once they cross the border, as all Democrat presidential contenders stated on live TV in 2020? Indeed, Are sanctuary cities a good idea, and do they support the lives and aspirations of actual U.S citizens?

When newspaper headlines scream about gun violence, is wringing your hands over the issue any solace for families in Chicago or Baltimore ghetto communities who experience gun violence on a daily basis? Do you care about the issue, or do you only get riled up when the mainstream media stokes your emotions?

Is a comment made by a movie star or celebrity – or a politician, for that matter – 30 or 40 years ago enough to cancel his or her career? Is calling others racist acceptable when, in your own heart, you know that you are biased at times against this group or that? Is virtue signaling an acceptable form of social participation, or should one actually take appropriate, non-violent action to address a wrong?

Violent Goals and Tactics
Tell me, is the Marxist ideology of BLM acceptable to you? Are the goals and violent tactics of Antifa acceptable to you? If they’re proud of what they stand for, and forthright in their actions, why do they wear ski masks? Appearing in selected cities in time to cause trouble, and leading the turmoil following the death of George Floyd, how many of them actually hold jobs?

Do any pay for their own transportation and housing costs? If they do not pay for themselves, who is paying? Most curiously, why do they often go after the most vulnerable people they can find in any gathering? Is it okay when law enforcement stands down in the face of violence committed by those on the left?

The Left embraces mass insanity and it’s getting more absurd all the time. The 22-month lockdown has given us all a taste of what socialism would be like.

What’s more, I don’t think that they understand the magnitude and ramifications of many of their political and social views. The Left’s agenda would destroy our civilization in less than a year or two.

One Generation Away, or Less

Ronald Reagan said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men [and women] were free.”

It would be nice to be able to reach consensus in some way with those on the Left, however my sensibilities cry out and say that would be cultural and national suicide.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Grassley calls on Attorney General Garland to withdraw controversial school memo to FBI
"So, the Feds may be keeping track of school board meetings—even if it creates a horrible chilling effect," Grassley said.

Updated: January 5, 2022 - 11:31pm

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on Wednesday called out Attorney General Merrick Garland on the Senate floor to withdraw his controversial memo asking the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to investigate threats and violence at school board meetings.

Grassley, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said: "Now, just to be crystal clear, there’s no excuse for real threats or acts of violence at school board meetings, but if there are such threats, these should be handled at the local level and the Attorney General should withdraw his memo that started this whole thing."

Garland wrote a memo in October instructing the FBI and other law enforcement agencies to partner to "address the rise in criminal conduct directed toward school personnel" following heated school board meetings about Critical Race Theory and other political issues in class.

In response to Garland's memo, the FBI's Counterterrorism Division created a "threat tag" to track "instances of related threats" to local school faculty and board members.

Republicans on Grassley's committee wrote two letters to Garland pushing back against the memo. The December letter began by asking Garland, "Are concerned parents domestic terrorists or not?"

The Justice Department responded to Grassley shortly before Christmas. The agency did not state why the FBI's counterterrorism division was involved in local school board issues, but the letter made clear that the department had no intention of withdrawing the original memo.

"The Department of Justice owes the American people a better answer than just a one-page letter" Grassley stated.

"So, the Feds may be keeping track of school board meetings—even if it creates a horrible chilling effect. And, of course the FBI looking over your shoulder would have a chilling effect," Grassley stated. "Next week the Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on domestic terrorism. I hope we’re going to be focusing on the serious threats facing our country—and I hope no one thinks the focus is on our nation’s parents."

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1478874175058108416
.44 min

Grassley argued that the Justice Department should be protecting the rights of parents to advocate for their children, rather than scaring parents out of doing so.

"Attorney General Garland should withdraw his memo. And he should take Congress’s oversight, and concern for the rights of parents, more seriously," Grassley concluded.

Conservative legal group Judicial Watch recently filed a lawsuit to obtain records about Garland's memo.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
“It’s the Beginning of Communism and I Think It’s Beyond, Long Beyond the Beginning” – President Trump on Censorship of Conservatives Like Gateway Pundit by T-Mobile (VIDEO)

By Joe Hoft
Published January 6, 2022 at 7:30am
President-Trump-with-Christina-Bobb.jpg

President Trump sat down with OAN’s Christina Bobb to discuss the current state of affairs in the US on Wednesday.

This was an excellent interview by one of the top truly impressive reporters in the country today.

One item that OAN’s Bobb discussed was censorship, where she mentioned that the Gateway Pundit was now being censored by T-Mobile. According to our readers, the telephone carrier started removing and erasing any text messages with links to The Gateway Pundit.


One of our readers had reached out to T-mobile through chat support and was sent a link to a Reuters article discussing an FCC decision on censoring texts. The decision was actually meant to stop robotexts and spam messages, not individual texts. The customer service representative admitted that the carrier has been censoring websites via the transmission of text messages.


From the OAN interview.
Christina Bobb: It’s very clear conservatives are being censored. We know T-Mobile is removing Gateway Pundit from text messages in their app. So conservatives, and rightly Americans are concerned that our freedom of speech is in jeopardy. What do you think?

President Trump: It’s the beginning of communism and I think it’s beyond, long beyond the beginning. They are censoring in a very strong level, conservative voices, Republican voices. And they’re almost blatant about it. It’s incredible when you think what they are doing and how they’re going about it.
Rumble video 1:50 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Huh_ Glenn Youngkin, Who Won With Anti-CRT Support, Just Tapped an Education Secretary With CRT and Common Core Ties

Huh? Glenn Youngkin, Who Won With Anti-CRT Support, Just Tapped an Education Secretary With CRT and Common Core Ties

By J.D. Rucker • Jan. 6, 2022

Voters have been increasingly disappointed in betrayals from politicians they have supported. For example, I was blindsided yesterday by Senator Ted Cruz talking about January 6 as if he was a radical leftist Democrat propagandist.
Usually, politicians wait until they’re in office and have some months or even years under their belts before they break their promises and go against their supporters. Inbound Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin didn’t wait to take the oath before betraying the base that got elected, namely parents who want Critical Race Theory abolished from their schools. He tapped Aimee Rogstad Guidera to be his Education Secretary. She’s not what the parents who voted for Youngkin had in mind.

According to Joy Pullman at The Federalist:
Guidera was the founder and longtime chief executive of the Data Quality Campaign (DQC). She ran the organization from 2005 until May 2018, when she left to pursue private consulting. Founding DQC is the biggest and most visible education-related job on Guidera’s resume.

Yet DQC is deeply tied to the political swamp on almost every education issue possible, including the Common Core debacle and racist critical theory. These are not just associational ties, but also major financial ties.

Despite repeated inquiries, Youngkin communications staff declined to answer specific questions for this article and instead directed The Federalist to a quote published in a Daily Wire article three weeks ago about other potential conflicts of interest between Youngkin’s education secretary and his stated education policies.
Cato Institute Education Analyst Neal McCluskey said, “The only kind of disconnect is, I don’t see anything in her past that indicates that she has a a lot of history of trying to remove things that people don’t like in the curriculum because they’re at odds with their values, or they’re at odds with how history should be taught.”

The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican who makes leftist moves.

At least with Democrats we can see the leftism coming. Republicans are supposed to act more conservative than what Glenn Youngkin is demonstrating.
 
Top