[gvt] Bush Taps Kissinger to Head 9/11 Probe

Brother Rat

Deceased
www.washingtonpost.com

Bush Taps Kissinger to Head 9/11 Probe


By Jennifer Loven
Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, November 27, 2002; 10:18 AM


President Bush signed legislation creating a new independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11 attacks Wednesday and named former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to lead the panel.

"Dr. Kissinger will bring broad experience, clear thinking and careful judgment to this important task," Bush said at a signing ceremony in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. "Mr. secretary, thank you for returning to the service of your nation."

The commission has a broad mandate, building on the limited joint inquiry conducted by the House and Senate intelligence committees. The independent panel will have 18 months to examine issues such as aviation security and border problems, along with intelligence.

Bush called on members to report back more quickly than 18 months, saying the nation needed to know quickly how it can avoid terror attacks in the future. "The sooner we have the commission's conclusions, the sooner we can act on them," Bush said.

"This should carefully examine all evidence and follow all facts, wherever they lead," the president said.

However, Bush did not set as a primary goal for the commission to uncover mistakes or lapses of the government that could have prevented the Sept. 11 attacks. Instead, he said it should try to help the administration learn the tactics and motives of the enemy.

"This commission will help me and future presidents to understand ... the nature of the threats we face," he said.


© 2002 The Associated Press
 

LONEWOLF

Deceased
Objectivity? Not here. He is an expert in what part of the process? A lifetime bureaucrat, and a proponent of and dealer with the Chicoms. And a NWO'er.

In other words, another one of the Good Old Boys put in charge of the Investigation's goals, structure, research, interviews, and resulting reports. Ya'll just *knew* it could not happen any other way......
 

chairborne commando

Membership Revoked
I laughed out loud when I saw Kissinger at his news conference.
He's bought and paid for. Henry is the last person I would have appointed if I was interested in conducting an objective, unbiased inquiry. Or, even the semblance of an objective
inquiry.

Well, now we know how serious they are about the truth,
don't we?

This is a bad joke. How stupid do they think we are?

And what's this about the families of the victims having an integral part? Why? For "closure"? So the proletariat...um...
that is, "the American People", can feel that they are participating, somehow?
 

expose'

The Pulse......
I cannot believe it! :shk:

They really have to stop this recycling. :rolleyes:

I think it would be a good idea to look into Kissengers history with those in the Middle east.....
 

Cascadians

Leska Emerald Adams
Wonder what percentage of Joe Schmoes out there are starting to feel uneasy.
Public perceived by PTB as total powerless gullible idiots.
 

alchemike

Veteran Member
if this wasn't so sad...

it might just be the funniest thing that i've ever heard...

i don't have the time right now, but would somebody please start a thread for kissinger past inequities...they are manifold...

he is cream of the scum...

o)<

mike
 

Plantlady

Inactive
Putting Kissinger in charge of investigating 9-11 is like:


Putting Allen Dulles in charge of the Warren Commission

Putting John Ashcroft in charge of protecting internet privacy.

Putting Janet Reno in charge of capturing David Koresh.

Putting Ghenghis Kahn in charge of peace talks.

Putting Osama Bin Laden in charge of U.S. airport security.

Putting Monsanto in charge of health foods.

Putting Jeb Bush in charge of overseeing elections.

Putting George Bush in charge of investigating Iran/Contra

Putting Bill Clinton in charge of the war on drugs.

Putting Paul Reubens in charge of investigating porno movies.


I'm sure that some of you can come up with better ones, but anyway, you get my point.
 

Storm

Membership Revoked
I kinda thought lucifer might be the proper choice , rumor has it he's the most honest guy in our solar system. Un-freaking believable. Still they won't be convinced. Remember this guy is wanted internationally and sticks his tounge out.


Storm
 
Last edited:

Truthsearch

Doom is ALWAYS 6 Months Away...
I tell you right now, mark my words, that this whole investigation is gong to be nothing but The Warren Commission, Part II.

And, like the Warren Commission, the Kissinger Commission is going to do nothing but produce 10+ volumes of research that only reenforces the party line.

I would be willing to be some of the commissions recommendations include stuff like: more private data on U.S. citizens needs to be stored to I.D. potential terrorists, more police power needed, do away with some parts of the constitution, expand the power of the federal gv't, etc.
 

someone

Inactive
to the C's,

they don't want to hear it. kill sadam. kill usama is all thats on his mind. and then get me a beer...

checkmate
 

timbo

Deceased
The man is a joke...............The process will be a joke............We will turn into a joke......................but we wont be laughing.
 

Morton298

Inactive
chairborne commando said:
I laughed out loud when I saw Kissinger at his news conference.
He's bought and paid for. Henry is the last person I would have appointed if I was interested in conducting an objective, unbiased inquiry. Or, even the semblance of an objective
inquiry.

Well, now we know how serious they are about the truth,
don't we?

This is a bad joke. How stupid do they think we are?

And what's this about the families of the victims having an integral part? Why? For "closure"? So the proletariat...um...
that is, "the American People", can feel that they are participating, somehow?


Yeah, i busted out laughing too when I heard the choice on the TV nooooooooooz. Such a most illogical choice, an epitome of "conflict of interest". Can you say BIG DOT?

Morton

Edit: P.S. The laughing was an emotional (or unemotional?) response. It wasn't that I thought I found this bit of news funny or anything.
 

wobble

Veteran Member
That is like getting Wayne Williams to baby sit....

...Jeffrey Dauhmer to drive your son to school....

...getting your dog to gaurd your turkey plate while you check the mail....

Giving Lizzie Borden an AXE FOR XMAS......


This IS a different kind of war.

My eyes are starting to adjust in this dark haze.
 

BugoutBear

Membership Revoked
Fer cryin' out loud! Does anyone remember what this punk put us through in Vietnam?

What's next, Westmoreland for defense secretary?
 

Gary Walsh

Contributing Member
My! My! How we tend to get mad at Uncle Henry.......

Surely it can't be a surprise?

At least I know where he stands, ALL THE TIME.........

One small hope, these guys are getting old and can't mess up much longer. Can they?????????????????

Of course the majority of people are like the guy I just talked with at the Post Office. We were discussing CWD and the venison being examined. He said "I didn't read about that, so I don't have to worry about it". Really meant it too.....
 

brkthr

Deceased
and I thought 3 time felon Poindexter as head of TIA was absurd.

This entire government is a theater of the absurd.

Surely,you RedWhiteandBlue apologists must see this for what it is.

Yah Yah I know.....Don't call me Shirley


James
 

timbo

Deceased
Dont mistake me for a bushie-wushie just because I want to support the president.

A screw up is a screw up.

Not mad at Henry. He is like a dog pissin on the floor. He dont know no better.
Bush knows better. In fact, his better and my better arent even in the same galaxy.
 

Lee P. Lapin

Inactive
Anyone care to guess what the outcome of THIS inquiry will be? Talk about the ulitmate insider- Henry the K is a lizard from way, way back, as the Nobel bio indicates:

http://www.nobel.se/peace/laureates/1973/kissinger-bio.html
Henry A. Kissinger – Biography
Henry Alfred Kissinger was the 56th Secretary of State of the United States from 1973 to 1977, continuing to hold the position of Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs which he first assumed in 1969 until 1975. After leaving government service, he founded Kissinger Associates, an international consulting firm, of which he is chairman.

Dr. Kissinger was born in Fuerth, Germany, on May 27, 1923, came to the United States in 1938, and was naturalised a United States citizen on June 19, 1943. He received the BA Degree Summa *** Laude at Harvard College in 1950 and the MA and PhD Degrees at Harvard University in 1952 and 1954 respectively.

From 1954 until 1971 he was a member of the Faculty of Harvard University, both in the Department of Government and at the Center for International Affairs. He was Associate Director of the Center from 1957 to 1960. He served as Study Director, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, for the Council of Foreign Relations from 1955 to 1956; Director of the Special Studies Project for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund from 1956 to 1958; Director of the Harvard International Seminar from 1951 to 1971, and Director of the Harvard Defense Studies Program from 1958 to 1971. (He was on leave of absence from Harvard from January 1969 to January 1971).

Secretary Kissinger has written many books and articles on United States foreign policy, international affairs, and diplomatic history. Among the awards he has received are the Guggenheim Fellowship (1965-66), the Woodrow Wilson Prize for the best book in the fields of government, politics and international affairs (1958), the American Institute for Public Service Award (1973), the International Platform Association Theodore Roosevelt Award (1973), the Veterans of Foreign Wars Dwight D. Eisenhower Distinguished Service Medal (1973), the Hope Award for International Understanding (1973), the Presidentia1 Medal of Freedom (1977) and the Medal of Liberty (1986).

He has served as a consultant to the Department of State (1965-68), United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (1961-68), Rand Corporation (1961-68), National Security Council (1961-62), Weapons Systems Evaluation Group of the joint Chiefs of Staff (1959-60), Operations Coordinating Board (1955), Director of the Psychological Strategy Board (1952), Operations Research Office (1951), and Chairman of the National Bipartisan Commission on Central America (1983-84).

From 1943 to 1946 Dr. Kissinger served in the U.S. Army Counter-Intelligence Corps and from 1946 to 1949 was a captain in the Military Intelligence Reserve.

He married Ann Fleischer in 1949 and was divorced in 1964. There were two children, Elizabeth and David. In 1974 he married Nancy Maginnes.



Selected Bibliography

By Kissinger

Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994. (A historical analysis of modern diplomacy including a defense of his policies during the Vietnam war.)

Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. New York: Harper, 1957.

The White House Years. Boston: Little Brown, 1979. (Memoirs, covering November 1968-January 1973.)

A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace 1812-22. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957. (Kissinger's doctoral dissertation.)

Years of Upheaval. Boston: Little Brown, 1982. (Memoirs, covering January 1973 to the resignation of President Nixon.)

Other Sources

Hersh, Seymour M. The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House. New York: Summit Books, 1983. (An indictment, based on extensive research.)

Isaacson, Walter. Kissinger. A Biography. London: Faber and Faber, 1992. (Critical, but balanced.)

Schulzinger, Robert D. Henry Kissinger: Doctor of Diplomacy. New York: Columbia Univresity Press, 1989. (Scholarly.)

From Nobel Lectures, Peace 1971-1980.
==================================

The effusive, voluminous website for K's firm is at
http://www.kmaglobal.com/ . Don't strain your eyes reading... .

For a bit more internet gleaning, see EliteWatch at
http://elitewatch.netfirms.com/Kissinger_Associates.html
==================================

Oh, yeah. There will be some STUNNING revelations from this one, all right. Y'all hold your breath waiting...

lpl
 

ace

Inactive
I think i'm going to be SICK !:kk2: :kk1:

A few quotes from Henry:

__________________________________________

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer. "
Henry A. Kissinger

"The Vietnam War required us to emphasize the national interest rather than abstract principles. What President Nixon and I tried to do was unnatural. And that is why we didn't make it. "
Henry A. Kissinger

"Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac. "
Henry A. Kissinger

"I can think of no faster way to unite the American people behind George W. Bush than a terrorist attack on an American target overseas. And I believe George W. Bush will quickly unite the American people through his foreign policy. "
Henry A. Kissinger

nuff said .
 

seraphima

Veteran Member
Plantlady -

"Putting Osama Bin Laden in charge of U.S. airport security.

Putting Monsanto in charge of health foods. "


:D :D :D Thanks, your list is one of the funniest things I've read in a while. Just wish it didn't hurt so much to laugh at this one! :rolleyes:


And Rex, I'm with you!
 

FredFredson

Inactive
Here is a few more choice bits of Kissinger "wit".
F
======================

"The US must carry out some act somewhere in the world which shows its' determination to continue to be a world power."-- Henry Kissinger, post-Vietnam blues, as quoted in The Washington Post, April 1975

"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." -- Henry Kissinger speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 Bilderburgers meeting. Unbeknownst to Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting.

"I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves."-- Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State under Richard Nixon, about Chile prior to the CIA overthrow of the democratically elected government of socialist President Salvadore Allende in 1973

" Why should we flagellate ourselves for what the Cambodians did to each other?"-- Henry Kissinger - who (with Richard Nixon) was responsible for the massive bombing of Cambodia in 1973, which killed three-quarters of a million peasants and disrupted Cambodian society, setting the stage for Pol Pot to come to power and ultimately kill another one-and-a-half million people

" Covert action should not be confused with missionary work."-- Henry Kissinger, commenting on the US sellout of the Kurds in Iraq in 1975
 

deja

Inactive
:kk1: :kk2:

HERE IS ANOTHER ARTICLE ABOUT HENRY.

The Latest Kissinger Outrage
Why is a proven liar and wanted man in charge of the 9/11 investigation?
By Christopher Hitchens
Posted Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 3:36 PM PT

The Bush administration has been saying in public for several months that it does not desire an independent inquiry into the gross "failures of intelligence" that left U.S. society defenseless 14 months ago. By announcing that Henry Kissinger will be chairing the inquiry that it did not want, the president has now made the same point in a different way. But the cynicism of the decision and the gross insult to democracy and to the families of the victims that it represents has to be analyzed to be believed.

1) We already know quite a lot, thanks all the same, about who was behind the attacks. Most notable in incubating al-Qaida were the rotten client-state regimes of the Saudi Arabian oligarchy and the Pakistani military and police elite. Henry Kissinger is now, and always has been, an errand boy and apologist for such regimes.

2) When in office, Henry Kissinger organized massive deceptions of Congress and public opinion. The most notorious case concerned the "secret bombing" of Cambodia and Laos, and the unleashing of unconstitutional methods by Nixon and Kissinger to repress dissent from this illegal and atrocious policy. But Sen. Frank Church's commission of inquiry into the abuses of U.S. intelligence, which focused on illegal assassinations and the subversion of democratic governments overseas, was given incomplete and misleading information by Kissinger, especially on the matter of Chile. Rep. Otis Pike's parallel inquiry in the House (which brought to light Kissinger's personal role in the not-insignificant matter of the betrayal of the Iraqi Kurds, among other offenses) was thwarted by Kissinger at every turn, and its eventual findings were classified. In other words, the new "commission" will be chaired by a man with a long, proven record of concealing evidence and of lying to Congress, the press, and the public.

3) In his second career as an obfuscator and a falsifier, Kissinger appropriated the records of his time at the State Department and took them on a truck to the Rockefeller family estate in New York. He has since been successfully sued for the return of much of this public property, but meanwhile he produced, for profit, three volumes of memoirs that purported to give a full account of his tenure. In several crucial instances, such as his rendering of U.S. diplomacy with China over Vietnam, with apartheid South Africa over Angola, and with Indonesia over the invasion of East Timor (to cite only some of the most conspicuous), declassified documents have since shown him to be a bald-faced liar. Does he deserve a third try at presenting a truthful record, after being caught twice as a fabricator? And on such a grave matter as this?

4) Kissinger's "consulting" firm, Kissinger Associates, is a privately held concern that does not publish a client list and that compels its clients to sign confidentiality agreements. Nonetheless, it has been established that Kissinger's business dealings with, say, the Chinese Communist leadership have closely matched his public pronouncements on such things as the massacre of Chinese students. Given the strong ties between himself, his partners Lawrence Eagleburger and Brent Scowcroft, and the oil oligarchies of the Gulf, it must be time for at least a full disclosure of his interests in the region. This thought does not seem to have occurred to the president or to the other friends of Prince Bandar and Prince Bandar's wife, who helped in the evacuation of the Bin Laden family from American soil, without an interrogation, in the week after Sept. 11.

5) On Memorial Day 2001, Kissinger was visited by the police in the Ritz Hotel in Paris and handed a warrant, issued by Judge Roger LeLoire, requesting his testimony in the matter of disappeared French citizens in Pinochet's Chile. Kissinger chose to leave town rather than appear at the Palais de Justice as requested. He has since been summoned as a witness by senior magistrates in Chile and Argentina who are investigating the international terrorist network that went under the name "Operation Condor" and that conducted assassinations, kidnappings, and bombings in several countries. The most spectacular such incident occurred in rush-hour traffic in downtown Washington, D.C., in September 1976, killing a senior Chilean dissident and his American companion. Until recently, this was the worst incident of externally sponsored criminal violence conducted on American soil. The order for the attack was given by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who has been vigorously defended from prosecution by Henry Kissinger.

Moreover, on Sept. 10, 2001, a civil suit was filed in a Washington, D.C., federal court, charging Kissinger with murder. The suit, brought by the survivors of Gen. Rene Schneider of Chile, asserts that Kissinger gave the order for the elimination of this constitutional officer of a democratic country because he refused to endorse plans for a military coup. Every single document in the prosecution case is a U.S.-government declassified paper. And the target of this devastating lawsuit is being invited to review the shortcomings of the "intelligence community"?

In late 2001, the Brazilian government canceled an invitation for Kissinger to speak in Sao Paulo because it could no longer guarantee his immunity. Earlier this year, a London court agreed to hear an application for Kissinger's imprisonment on war crimes charges while he was briefly in the United Kingdom. It is known that there are many countries to which he cannot travel at all, and it is also known that he takes legal advice before traveling anywhere. Does the Bush administration feel proud of appointing a man who is wanted in so many places, and wanted furthermore for his association with terrorism and crimes against humanity? Or does it hope to limit the scope of the inquiry to those areas where Kissinger has clients?

There is a tendency, some of it paranoid and disreputable, for the citizens of other countries and cultures to regard President Bush's "war on terror" as opportunist and even as contrived. I myself don't take any stock in such propaganda. But can Congress and the media be expected to swallow the appointment of a proven coverup artist, a discredited historian, a busted liar, and a man who is wanted in many jurisdictions for the vilest of offenses? The shame of this, and the open contempt for the families of our victims, ought to be the cause of a storm of protest.
<http://slate.msn.com/images/eshop/XMLbuddy_header.gif>

http://slate.msn.com/?id=2074678
 

imaginative

keep your eye on the ball
Like many of you, I too laughed out loud and nearly wrecked my truck when I heard the news. Actually, with his history of crimes against humanity be is the perfect choice for the cover-up. I wonder if the lie will be better than Waco or OKC?
 

Lone Eagle Woman

Veteran Member
So Mr. NWO - Trilaterist Himself is raising his head again. This
cannot NOT NOT be good! With so many of our constitutional
freedoms going by the wayside and now this. What will be next??

Maybe the Gestapo (Homeland Security) and maybe off to the
Concentration Camps by chance????
 

'plain o joe'

Membership Revoked
Like I said in a different thread:

It's like having the FOX account for the missing chickens. WHITE WASH. NWO investigating NWO

Just got back from our local BLUES CLUB wearing my camo jacket. When asked if I'm a hunter, I reply no, just wearing FUTURE fashion.....
 

nutkin

Hormonal...and Armed
I swear my jaw just dropped open!!!! UnREAL! They aren't even hiding it anymore!!! Good grief!

FredFredson....you beat me to it, the perfect quote:

"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil....

...and that about sez it all.
 

howdeedoodee

Veteran Member
I didn't used to be an NWO conspiracy nut. I want to like Bush. I used to take Storm's views along with some of your views with a grain of salt. However, with this Henry thing I am getting very very nervous. I used to think all the scalar conspiracy stories about the WTC collapse was just smoke and mirrors. But now...now I am starting to wonder. One thing is for sure, if there was something about the WTC matter they don't want to come out it will not come out now.
 

lars

Membership Revoked
Hitchens---an entertaining and independent Lefty thinker.

Kissinger---he who unites Right and Left in mutual loathing. Hey, maybe that speaks well for Henry the K.

If he wasn't Jewish, I'd swear Kissinger was the model for Dr. Strangelove.
 

deja

Inactive
Oh, lars..........If he wasn't Jewish, I'd swear Kissinger was the model for Dr. Strangelove. :lol: :lol: :rofl:
 

homecanner1

Veteran Member
Well well well....Special K himself...

I went into a rant as soon as I heard it on tv. Complete and utter shock at the audacity of the choice to head this "investigation".

IF you still had any doubts about WTF is going on here, ya'll be assured with this announcement that the full gameplan IS in play.

Thanksgiving Email greeting from my European kinfolk yesterday:

This is the "thanks" that America was given? An example of noble Presidential "Grace" for the victim's families? What a "turkey" of a decision. "

They are aghast that we are not outraged by this one. I tried to explain that Timing is everything...many people were in "transit" to relatives yesterday, or buying/preparing lavish meals, visiting with family, watching sports or just passed out from the gorging.

Not one person was aware of this 11th hour announcement at my Illinois relatives house yesterday, till I brought the subject up.

So reconcile yourselves to the fact there ain't gonna be no 'truth'
commission and there ain't gonna be no justice or mercy, either.

This shows me that they mean serious bidness folks, to conceal
"others" tracks . Henry was sent in to bat clean up and get rid of all that nasty mess out in the front yard. You know what they say about eating "yellow snow". It tastes kinda like Chinese food.

You are an errand boy for grocery clerks...said Col. Kurtz. Indeed

PL family destroyed, Chuck's van, now Henry. This truly sucks. I'm gonna raid the leftover pumpkin pie in the fridge, who's with me?
 

Lee P. Lapin

Inactive
[GOVT] Transcript: Kissinger Interview On The Formation Of A Commission To Probe 9-11

Note: Previous thread on the Kissinger appointment is at
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=49589&highlight=Kissinger
========================================

INVESTIGATING SEPTEMBER 11TH: A panel of experts and lawmakers discuss
the task ahead for an independent commission established to probe the
circumstances that led to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as well as the
appointment of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger as its head.
Margaret Warner, PBS.
__________________________________________

NEWS HOUR WITH JIM LEHRER PBS TV

6:00 PM NOVEMBER 27, 2002

__________________________________________

Investigating September 11th

MARGARET WARNER: In naming Henry Kissinger to head the new commission
today, President Bush said further investigation into what led to
September 11 could help make America more secure.

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: In the war against terror, our goal is to
take every measure that is necessary, to gather all information that is
available, and gain every advantage that is possible. An aggressive
investigation into September 11, with a responsible concern for
sensitive information that will allow us to win the war on terror, will
contribute to the security of this country.

MARGARET WARNER: Afterwards, Kissinger spoke briefly with reporters.

HENRY KISSINGER: The effort will be conducted on a nonpartisan basis to
get at the circumstances that led to this tragedy. And to the extent
that this commission can make recommendations, we... and we are free to
make recommendations, and the president has said that he will take them
very seriously. To that extent, we... it will contribute to the safety
of America, to the future of America, and to the avoidance of any
future tragedies.

MARGARET WARNER: He was asked what obligation he felt to the families
of the 9/11 victims.

HENRY KISSINGER: We have a special responsibility to those who suffered
such terrible and, of course, totally unexpected losses. I have had an
opportunity to talk to many of those who were here. I have told them
that I would designate a staff member to be in daily contact with them.
I will meet with them monthly. I will have the first meeting with them,
tentatively planned for December 12, together with any other
commissioners that may have been appointed at that time. But the
families are an integral part of our process.

REPORTER: Dr. Kissinger, do you have any concerns about, once the
commission begins its work, if fingers point to valuable allies-- say,
Saudi Arabia, for example-- the implications, the policy implications
it could have for the United States, particularly at this delicate
time?

HENRY KISSINGER: I have been given every assurance by the president
that we should... that we should go where the facts lead us, and that
we're not restricted by any foreign policy considerations. I have had a
conversation with the Secretary of State, who will designate a liaison
person with us. And he has promised me, as one would expect, the
fullest cooperation. We are under no restriction. And we would accept
no restriction.

MARGARET WARNER: Separately, former Senate Majority Leader George
Mitchell, named by Democratic congressional leaders late today as the
commission's vice-chairman, said in a statement: "As the country
mobilizes to avert terrorist attacks in the future, we need a full
understanding of the circumstances that led up to September 11. I will
do all I can to ensure that the Commission's inquiry is thorough, fair,
and non-partisan."

MARGARET WARNER: For reaction to today's news, we turn to Republican
Congressman Christopher Shays of Connecticut, one of the chief backers
of the legislation creating the commission; Democratic Congresswoman
Jane Harman of California, a member of the House Intelligence Committee
and of the recently completed joint House-Senate inquiry into pre-9/11
intelligence failures; Stephen Push, cofounder of the Families of
September 11, which represents the families of about 1,200 victims. His
wife, Lisa Raines, died in the plane that struck the Pentagon. And
David Aaron, who served on the National Security Council staff under
Henry Kissinger in the early 1970s; he also was a staffer of the Church
Committee, which investigated the CIA in 1975, and he was deputy
national security advisor in the Carter Administration. Welcome to you
all.

Stephen Push, your reaction to today's announcement.

STEPHEN PUSH: Well, Dr. Kissinger was not on the list that we had
supplied to the White House of candidates that we preferred. However, I
think it's a good appointment. I think it shows that the administration
is taking this investigation very seriously, that they appointed
someone of Dr. Kissinger's caliber to lead it.

MARGARET WARNER: Congressman Shays, your view of both the Dr. Kissinger
choice and also what the George Mitchell choice adds to the mix.

REP. CHRISTOPHER SHAYS: Well, the bill requires two... it requires
prominent members be selected. He couldn't have found... they couldn't
have found more prominent members than Henry Kissinger and George
Mitchell.

MARGARET WARNER: Do you want to expand on that a little?

REP. CHRISTOPHER SHAYS: Well, they're both so experienced. They're very
capable. They know the ins and outs of Washington, and they're not
going to accept any stonewalling. I mean, both of these gentlemen have
their reputations on their line; they have their concern for their
country. And if anybody is going to get at the facts, it's going to be
these two individuals with the other eight that will be appointed; a
wonderful start -- eight more to go, but a wonderful start.

MARGARET WARNER: David Aaron, you've worked with Henry Kissinger. Your
view.

DAVID AARON: Well, I think his basic values are oriented towards
American credibility, American power, American authority and
legitimacy. Now he's going to have to add to that a real concern for
transparency and accountability. This is an important challenge for
him. I think he is an excellent choice, but it's going to be a growing
experience for him.

MARGARET WARNER: Congresswoman Harman, you were on this joint inquiry
that's just concluded, and many of your members came to feel, as you
did, that a further inquiry was needed, that you needed an independent
commission. Why? What is the task before this independent commission
that you felt you all couldn't completely explore?

REP. JANE HARMAN: Well, let me start by saying I think we're doing
quite a good job. Our report is not yet out. In fact, the members
haven't reviewed it. We'll review it on December 10. But I think it
will show a good deal of the 9/11 plot, what went right, what went
wrong, what we need to do. The commission is designed to build on our
report, and only if it's inadequate, to investigate.

I must say, though, having heard the other three answers, that I'm much
more dubious about Dr. Kissinger to head this panel. I think he brings
a lot of baggage. He has a penchant for secrecy, which is not what's
needed here. There are questions about his role in Vietnam, as well in
the coup in Chile.

And I wish the White House had been less afraid of this commission and
had reached for someone who would clearly demonstrate on day one that
he is-- he/she-- unbiased, really nonpartisan, and will do whatever
needs to be done at this point. I must say that Stephen Push, in my
view, and the other families, are the reason this commission exists at
all, and I think they probably had a list of candidates who would have
been better choices than Dr. Kissinger.

MARGARET WARNER: Let me first go back to Congressman Shays. What about
that point that Henry Kissinger brings a lot of baggage?

REP. CHRISTOPHER SHAYS: Well, I think almost anybody who is prominent
is going to bring some baggage. I mean, you have George Mitchell. I
don't know anyone more partisan in the Senate than George Mitchell. But
when he's asked to do a job and the kind of job he's asked to do, I
think he'll rise to the occasion, as I do think Henry Kissinger will as
well. I mean, you need people who know the system. You need people who
know the intelligence community. You need people who know when they're
not getting the answers. And I don't think you could find two stronger
candidates for that, and I think they both balance each other quite
well.

MARGARET WARNER: Stephen Push, back to you. So why did the families
push so hard for this independent commission? What do you want this
commission to do that the earlier inquiry hasn't?

STEPHEN PUSH: Well, actually I'm kind of concerned about one statement
that President Bush made at the signing this morning. He suggested that
the main purpose of this commission is to help him understand the
terrorists better, and that's not how we see it at all. We think that
the primary function of this commission is to investigate what the
United States government did wrong prior to 9/11 that made our country
so vulnerable, because we believe the only way the commission can make
sound recommendations for preventing future terrorist attacks is to
understand what went wrong prior to September 11.

MARGARET WARNER: And this commission, as I understand it, is going to
have a broader scope than the previous Congressional inquiry did in
terms of what branches of government it looks at, is that right?

STEPHEN PUSH: That's correct. The initial inquiry only looked at
intelligence, and it's not even going to be able to finish that
completely. We want this commission to take a much broader view, to not
only look at intelligence, but look at aviation security, immigration,
border control, diplomacy-- all of the various elements that played a
role in making us so vulnerable in 2001.

MARGARET WARNER: Congresswoman Harman...you probably didn't hear the
president speak, but would you share Steve Push's concern, or do you
agree with him that the focus of this commission should not... is not
really about the terrorists and why they did what they did, but is
about the failures of the U.S. Government?

REP. JANE HARMAN: I agree with that. I didn't hear what the president
said, but I think our goal is to look backward to look forward. What we
can do to honor the memories of those who died is to prevent this from
happening again, and the only way we do that is if we look back
clinically and objectively and make certain that whatever clues were
missed --. I don't think there's a smoking gun out there. I've studied
this very carefully -- but whatever clues were missed, whatever
information wasn't shared, whatever systems didn't exist, are now built
for the future.

And by the way, I was an early supporter of the Homeland Security
Department legislation. I'm glad it's finally enacted and the partisan
games are over. And I hope that Governor Ridge takes his vitamins, has
sharp elbows, and gets the job done for the future.

MARGARET WARNER: All right, David Aaron, you've been on this kind of a
commission. What are the big hurdles as they tackle... I mean, as we
just heard, it's not just the FBI and the CIA they have to look at, but
all these agencies of government.

DAVID AARON: The biggest thing is to get information. I mean, with all
the best will in the world on the part of the cabinet or the president,
there are lots of people in the woodwork who have to be able to... and
have to be willing to turn over the information in a timely way.

One of the very good things about Dr. Kissinger in this regard is that
he has a rather deep skepticism of the bureaucracy. And I think this is
going to stand him in very good stead as he presses for information.
You notice the president, one of the things he said right off the bat
was, "Well, we're going to have to be very careful about this
information." Well, if you can't share the information with Dr.
Kissinger and form Senator Mitchell, I don't know who you can share it
with.

MARGARET WARNER: So Congressman Shays, how broad are the powers of this
commission to get at the information?

REP. CHRISTOPHER SHAYS: The powers are broad. This legislation was
written so well. The purposes of the commission are well delineated.
The president, I think, was very clear. He said, "Follow all the facts
wherever they lead." But this commission is going to be guided by the
mandate of the law, and the law is clear.

It can look at any facts, uncover any information. It has subpoena
power. The commission... just the chairman and the vice chairman can
issue subpoenas. A majority of six can issue subpoenas. This is a
powerful commission; prominent people will be on it. And it has the
ability to look at September 11 before, after, and, you know, clearly
what we're doing now.

MARGARET WARNER: But doesn't David Aaron raise a point about it still
depends on the willingness of the keepers of the information to
surrender that? I mean, didn't the prior committee complain that they
felt there was a little foot- dragging?

REP. CHRISTOPHER SHAYS: Right, but that's the key. I mean, you know,
are you going to say no to George Mitchell and Henry Kissinger? If you
do, you do it at your own peril. I mean, the key to this commission,
besides how well it's written, and the pushing that's gone by the
families and the fact they're going to oversee this, the key is who is
appointed to it? And we already have two outstanding individuals, and
we got eight to go. And when you bring them all together as a group, I
think this is going to be powerful.

MARGARET WARNER: What else are you looking for, Stephen Push, in terms
of appointees?

STEPHEN PUSH: Appointees? Well, we have some specific recommendations
in mind. We would like to see Warren Rudman and Tim Rohmer be on the
commission.

MARGARET WARNER: Former Senator and a Congressman.

STEPHEN PUSH: Congressman Tim Rohmer, this is his last year in
Congress, so he will be a former Congressman soon, and he was one of
the chief proponents of the commission.

MARGARET WARNER: Why were you all, though, the families, so insistent
that it be an independent commission? That is, as I understand in the
legislation, it can't be anybody who is now in government.

STEPHEN PUSH: That's correct, because we believe that this should take
a hard look at the current administration, prior administrations,
congressional oversight, so anyone who is currently serving in
government would have a conflict in one of those areas.

MARGARET WARNER: Do you think, David Aaron, that the fact that it is an
independent commission has an added benefit somehow, I mean, either in
their own willingness to push or in the willingness of the bureaucracy
to cooperate, or does it make it harder?

DAVID AARON: Well, I think it's... it doesn't make it any harder. I
think it may actually make it a little easier in the sense that clearly
this commission is not playing to the grandstands. This is not a
political exercise really. And so I think in that sense there's perhaps
a little less anxiety in the administration, in the bureaucracy, about
this.

But one of their real tough jobs is we're looking at something that
didn't happen. We're looking at perhaps errors of omission, not errors
of commission. And those are the hardest. You can only get at that when
people really come forth and tell you what the problem is.

MARGARET WARNER: Finally, Congresswoman Harman and Congressman Shays,
before we go, both Henry Kissinger and George Mitchell in his statement
said they wanted this to be nonpartisan-- not bipartisan, nonpartisan.
What does that mean to you, and do you think it's possible,
Congresswoman?

REP. JANE HARMAN: I hope it means that it is above politics. This is
what we do need. It's important to remember, Margaret, that while this
will be going on and while the joint inquiry is going on-- it's still
not concluded, as I said-- hardworking patriots are in our intelligence
agencies trying to prevent the next attack, which may well come. And we
can't be undermining them while we do this exercise.

What we have to do is find out precisely what happened so we can learn
from it. We can't undo what happened and prevent the next attack.
That's how we honor the memory of those who died. And that's what I'm
going to be urging, as I hope... suggest people who can fill the other
eight slots. They have to be excellent people, and they have to be
nonpartisan, too, if this is going to work.

MARGARET WARNER: And, Congressman Shays, briefly, your view of what it
means to be nonpartisan.

REP. CHRISTOPHER SHAYS: Well, I think Jane answered it. In a way, this
commission has to be a family of ten people who don't think of
themselves as Democrats or Republicans, but think of themselves as
Americans first.

MARGARET WARNER: All right. Thank you all four very much.
 
Top