BRKG Trump’s home being raided by the FBI (OP Aug 2022}

stop tyranny

stop tyranny

Veteran Member
Raggedyman said:
been waiting for this - here's you're next FF . . . sowing the seeds of hate and discontent like good little commies interested in getting a bumper crop of it.

WAIT FOR IT - ITS ON THE WAY

might as well get ready to take the ride - because you're gonna buy the ticket​
Click to expand...
I have no doubt, they are trying to instigate violence and if that fails, they will likely create a false flag event to blame on Trump supporters. But at some point, people must acknowledge that inaction will inevitably lead to defeat.
Countrymouse said:
Here's what one poster put up as a commentary on the above:

John Rich
@johnrich
·
15h

A BIG thank you to Joe's FBI for raiding Trump's home! You guys just poured 81 million gallons of premium Patriot octane on an already blazing Freedom fire! See, you are good for something after all:) Much appreciated! See you in November!
Click to expand...
What has been done to ensure an honest and secure election since the blatant 2020 election fraud?
 
packyderms_wife

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
vector7 said:
Our two-tiered system of justice just added a third level – the weaponization of law enforcement agencies against Democrats’ political opponents.

I've experienced this corruption up close and personal, but now it's on display for the entire world to see.
RT 2min
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557505824225800192
View: https://twitter.com/SenRonJohnson/status/1557505824225800192?t=uTWLUJzlrGZU2wtptokW3g&s=19
Click to expand...

Sad but true, welcome to the turd world sh*t hole known as the former united states of america.
 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
All the ACAB people support the Mar-a-Lago raid. 100% of them
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557723781128286208
View: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1557723781128286208?s=20&t=qjophs-HIQOWN-ovhuf-pw

Find one ACAB person who is speaking out against the 87,000 new IRS agents and deadly force (because they're signing up for duty against Middle Class)
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557728209776832516
View: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1557728209776832516?s=20&t=qjophs-HIQOWN-ovhuf-pw

When you suggest to the ACAB people (signing up to be new IRS agents) that the FBI might be corrupt.
RT 08secs
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557783958208774144
View: https://twitter.com/MostlyPeacefull/status/1557783958208774144?s=20&t=qjophs-HIQOWN-ovhuf-pw
 
Cacheman

Cacheman

Ultra MAGA!
I always knew TDS is a mental illness in some people but now there's proof these people are out of their minds insane. Even some twitter blue checks suggesting digging up Ivanas coffin and check inside for those documents...

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557526309261021184
View: https://twitter.com/NancyLeeGrahn/status/1557526309261021184?s=20&t=YU2jRxHo0rrNFcrOD1GlCw


Advice from a soap star? Good God, she still thinks she needs the spotlight and fans joined in...

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557732586101051393
View: https://twitter.com/London92852991/status/1557732586101051393?s=20&t=-1JnaL94FQHIR4yQSEm1Fw


https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557556376628592640
View: https://twitter.com/MontyBoa99/status/1557556376628592640?s=20&t=bFE-AulxV8IBGDQ3BqR-tw


https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557710488070496256
View: https://twitter.com/B52Malmet/status/1557710488070496256?s=20&t=criKSFoHo9PWMHO0LNhi-g


It's thousands of people leaving comments like this but the FBI may be just as insane and actually dig up the coffin.
 
Countrymouse

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
WSB radio just said there are "reports" (did not specify where they got this) that a "mole" who worked INSIDE TRUMP'S MAR-A-LAGO home REPORTED to the FBI that certain items were there and where to find them.

(he/she oughta know............right?)

SO--

first they raid

then they refuse to say why they raided

then they say they'll let us know why

THEN this rumor comes out about a "mole" who planted reported "evidence" in the home after he/she put it there and where he/she hid it to find it.

NOW the liberal media is saying this will be an "explosive" afternoon as news comes out of "why" they raided the home, when the search warrant is released.
 
Lilbitsnana

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
TheSearcher said:
Garland's PERSONAL lawyers?

ETA: The actual tweet says DOJ lawyers.
Click to expand...
I'm not a lawyer and not even a smidgen as smart about those things as many, but...
Think about it. During a search, if something is found that might be evidence/incriminating in something else it can be used.

Multiple investigations going on trying to get Trump. Must be/maybe at least three....
Each lawyer could say, "hey, my case could use that info" blah, blah, blah.

Or, I could be completely wrong; we live in an upside down world right now.
 
Last edited:
TheSearcher

TheSearcher

Are you sure about that?
Countrymouse said:
THEN this rumor comes out about a "mole" who planted reported "evidence" in the home after he/she put it there and where he/she hid it to find it.
Click to expand...

I just had a HILARIOUS thought. What if the mole planted the info, that was picked up on the security cams, so Trump's security removed it. Then for 9.5 hours the FBI guys are frantically trying to find it!

"Oh, sh*t. It isn't here. The mole said they put it in the safe, AND IT'S NOT HERE!"
 
adgal

adgal

Veteran Member
Lilbitsnana said:
I'm not a lawyer and not even a smidgen as smart about those things as many, but...
Think about it. During a search, if something is found that might be evidence/incriminating in something else it can be used.

Multiple investigations going on trying to get Trump. Must be/maybe at least three....
Each lawyer could say, "hey, my case could use that info" blah, blah, blah.

Or, I could be completely wrong; we live in an upside down world right now.
Click to expand...
I believe that if anything is gathered that is not specifically on the warrant, it is inadmissible in a court of law.
 
Buick Electra

Buick Electra

TB2K Girls with Guns
Go to link to read attachments.

theconservativetreehouse.com

DOJ Files Motion to Unseal FBI Trump Raid Search Warrant and Property Seizure Receipt - The Last Refuge

Yesterday, President Trump requested from the court that the (1) DOJ affidavit underlying the probable cause as well as the (2) search warrant and (3) property seizure report be made public following the FBI raid on his home in West Palm Beach, Florida. Today, Attorney General Merrick Garland...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com

DOJ Files Motion to Unseal FBI Trump Raid Search Warrant and Property Seizure Receipt
August 11, 2022 | Sundance | 121 Comments

Yesterday, President Trump requested from the court that the (1) DOJ affidavit underlying the probable cause as well as the (2) search warrant and (3) property seizure report be made public following the FBI raid on his home in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Today, Attorney General Merrick Garland stated publicly the DOJ has filed a court motion to unseal the search warrant and the property seizure report; however, they would not release the probable cause affidavit. Here is the DOJ court filing [DOCUMENT LINK]

Notice the DOJ filing is from the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD).

The DOJ-NSD, was created by AG Eric Holder as the epicenter of DOJ political activity. The DOJ-NSD held no inspector general oversight; it is a subsidiary targeting mechanism within the DOJ that originates issues related to the FISA court and other issues of “national security”, which allows Main Justice to have a star chamber of secret operations away from oversight or public scrutiny.

The original Trump-Russia targeting was triggered from within the DOJ-NSD. The Carter Page FISA warrant, and all subsequent activity connected to the FISA court, come from the DOJ-NSD.

It is the combination of the DOJ-NSD and FBI Counterintelligence Unit, where we find every person and operation connected to the political targeting operations of Main Justice. Domestic political targeting is done within this subsidiary branch of the justice dept.
 
Countrymouse

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
adgal said:
I believe that if anything is gathered that is not specifically on the warrant, it is inadmissible in a court of law.
Click to expand...

What if the reason they wouldn't speak about OR release what was on the warrant

is they had to have time to DOCTOR the warrant to "match" the (supposedly) incriminating 'evidence' they had already found.

Don't say they "can't" do it.

They manufactured an American birth certificate for Obama.
 
Countrymouse

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Countrymouse

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
vector7 said:
Looks like there’s a report claiming a Secret Service agent was an inside source.

I’ll leave this here:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557835029245579265
View: https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1557835029245579265?s=20&t=zqmiDW9pJO6LmEfm-Vf8SA
Click to expand...

This article deserves to be fully quoted. This is the first time I am hearing of this.

I wonder, NOW, how President Trump got ANYTHING done. He was SURROUNDED by scoundrels, betrayers, and traitors--EVERYWHERE--even in his own home.

The Scandal of the Secret Service’s Deleted Texts

amgreatness.com

The Scandal of the Secret Service’s Deleted Texts › American Greatness

Before and during Donald Trump’s time in the White House, powerful federal agencies aligned to sabotage his candidacy and then his presidency. Once-trusted entities such as the FBI…
amgreatness.com amgreatness.com

Before and during Donald Trump’s time in the White House, powerful federal agencies aligned to sabotage his candidacy and then his presidency. Once-trusted entities such as the FBI, the intelligence community, and even parts of the U.S. military have burned their credibility by abandoning their missions to instead try to end Trump’s political career.


Does this include the Secret Service?


Unfortunately, the scandal over deleted texts related to January 6 demands the question.



Last month, the inspector general for the Department of Homeland Security, the agency that houses the Secret Service, officially informed Congress that text messages the office sought as part of its investigation into the Capitol protest were gone.


“The Department notified us that many U.S. Secret Service (USS) text messages, from January 5 and 6, 2021, were erased as part of a device-replacement program,” Dr. Joseph Cuffari wrote on July 13. “The USS erased those text messages after OIG requested records of electronic communications from the USS, as part of our evaluation of events at the Capitol on January 6,” an investigation Cuffari launched in February 2021.


Cuffari, a Trump appointee, addressed his letter to the Senate and House Homeland Security committees; the chair of the House Homeland Security committee is Representative Bennie Thomspon (D-Miss.) who also heads the January 6 select committee. On January 16, 2021, Congressional Democrats instructed DHS and other key federal agencies to retain all records involving the events of January 6.


Eleven days later, texts on cell phones used by multiple Secret Service officials and agents on duty on January 6 were erased.



A Secret Service spokesman indignantly downplayed the news. “The insinuation that the Secret Service maliciously deleted text messages following a request is false,” Anthony Guglielmi, communications director for the Secret Service, wrote in a statement on July 14. Mobile devices were reset to factory settings on January 27, 2021 as a result of a “system migration” in the works for three months, Guglielmi insisted. “DHS OIG requested electronic communications for the first time on Feb. 26, 2021, after the migration was well under way.”


A few days later, he admitted the texts “probably were not recoverable.”


Despite Guglielmi’s spin, congressional leaders had already asked DHS officials to produce “all documents and materials that refer or relate to events that could or ultimately did transpire on January 6” before Cuffari opened his inquiry. The devices were evidence in a congressional investigation; failing to archive backups of phones belonging to any DHS employee even remotely tied to what happened on January 6 is highly suspect if not a federal offense.


And the purge did not happen while Trump or his Homeland Security chief were in charge. Between Congress’ first request for DHS to retain all records associated with January 6 and the cell phone “reset” on January 27, 2021, Joe Biden became president—which means the deletions happened on his watch. (David Pekoske, Biden’s current director of the Transportation Safety Administration and a Trump holdover, temporarily served as DHS chief from January 20 until February 2, 2021 when Alejandro Mayorkas was confirmed by the Senate.)


So Joe Biden’s DHS is thwarting the internal January 6 investigation—and Cuffari warned congressional Democrats at least twice of the department’s noncooperation.



“During this reporting period, the Department significantly delayed OIG’s access to Department records, thereby impeding the progress of OIG’s review of the January 6 events at the Capitol,” Cuffari wrote in a semiannual report released in September 2021. “The Department repeatedly suggested that OIG might not have a right of access to the records sought, but during the months-long period in which access was delayed the Department did not cite any legal authority—that would have justified withholding the information.” A follow-up report published in March 2022 again warned that “access to Secret Service records [is] impeding the progress of our January 6, 2021 review.”


Bennie Thompson presumably received both reports. Why didn’t he act?


Turns out the controversy reaches the highest levels of the Secret Service in Washington, D.C. To expand his investigation last summer, Cuffari specifically asked DHS for all text messages sent or received by 24 Secret Service officials between December 7, 2020 and January 8, 2021. These weren’t random low-level agents; the list includes James Murray, the director of the Secret Service who just delayed his new gig at Snapchat to remain in the position as the scandal escalates, and Robert Engel, head of Trump’s detail.


The trove presumably would contain thousands of messages and perhaps hundreds just from January 5 and 6. But in response to a subpoena by the January 6 select committee, the Secret Service revealed a bombshell: they could only find one text. The agency then informed the committee that it “did not have any further records responsive to DHS OIG’s request for text messages” but will research whether “such texts are recoverable.”


To recap: Joe Biden’s DHS allowed a purge of Secret Service cell phone data without mandating and archiving content, is stonewalling an internal investigation into what Joe Biden insists is a terrorist attack comparable to 9/11, and now shrugs off the fact that texts from 24 Secret Service employees including the head of agency over a crucial one-month period might be gone for good.


Given those revelations, one would assume the January 6 committee and House Democrats would be livid at DHS officials and calling for heads to roll. They are—but they want Cuffari’s head.


Just a few days after Cuffari announced a criminal probe into the missing texts, Thompson and Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, asked for Cuffari’s resignation for failing “to inform Congress of this serious and flagrant violation of federal records laws.” In a follow-up letter on August 1, Thompson and Maloney accused Cuffari of “secretly abandon[ing] efforts” to collect the missing texts, an allegation that defies logic since Cuffari is the official who first publicly exposed the scandal.



Nevertheless, Thompson and Maloney asked Cuffari again to “step aside from this matter and for a new IG to be appointed in light of revelations that you had failed to keep Congress informed of your inability to obtain key information from the Secret Service.”


Biden reportedly is considering ousting Cuffari from his post; White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters last week that “we’re looking at the facts and the situation it is being investigated.”


Cuffari, for now, is standing his ground but it appears the Secret Service is attempting an end-around to further frustrate his investigation. The agency reportedly turned over the cell phone numbers of the 24 Secret Service agents in question to both the January 6 committee and the Justice Department in violation of a stand down order by Cuffari’s office not to interfere in its ongoing criminal inquiry.


Why the subterfuge? Would the texts finally explain why Kamala Harris, under Secret Service protection at the time, went to the Democratic National Committee headquarters the morning of January 6, the same place where a pipe bomb allegedly was found that afternoon? How did agents miss the explosive during a security sweep of the premises before she arrived? How did agents not locate the device for more than an hour while Harris remained in the building until law enforcement allegedly found it?


Would the public find out why the Secret Service made the decision to return Trump to the White House after his speech at the Ellipse against his wishes? Would testimony by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, particularly claims that Trump attempted to carjack his own presidential vehicle and strangle Robert Engel that afternoon, be debunked?



Would the mystery of Vice President Mike Pence’s exact whereabouts be solved? As the chaos unfolded that afternoon, what exactly did the Secret Service do? And if the situation was so dangerous, why didn’t they evacuate Trump from the White House? Were agents involved in the evacuation of top congressional leaders, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to Fort McNair around 3:00 p.m. on January 6?


Communications between Secret Service brass and agents in charge of protecting Trump, Harris, Pence, and Joe Biden that day almost certainly answer most if not all of those questions. And it’s the Biden regime and Democrats, not Trump or Joseph Cuffari, concealing the truth.






About Julie Kelly
Julie Kelly is a political commentator and senior contributor to American Greatness. She is the author of January 6: How Democrats Used the Capitol Protest to Launch a War on Terror Against the Political Right and Disloyal Opposition: How the NeverTrump Right Tried―And Failed―To Take Down the President. Her past work can be found at The Federalist and National Review. She also has been featured in the Wall Street Journal, The Hill, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, and Genetic Literacy Project. She is the co-host of the “Happy Hour Podcast with Julie and Liz.” She is a graduate of Eastern Illinois University and lives in suburban Chicago with her husband and two daughters.

 
Lilbitsnana

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
adgal said:
I believe that if anything is gathered that is not specifically on the warrant, it is inadmissible in a court of law.
Click to expand...

night driver said:
YEah, THAT is how search warrants work in OUR, dirt people's lives.
Click to expand...

This seems more like a Jan6 fishing/snoop trip than a retrieval mission or maybe they are looking for documents/things that would incriminate Dems to be able to "disappear" them (the docs/evidence).

But, I think if they "see something" while there they can wait for a new warrant or go back at a later date under a different warrant.

Like going into a home looking for a knife and seeing drug making/distribution stuff and drugs; they can wait for a new warrant while there or go back later after they get a new one

They want him (and us) out of the way, or dead, and they will leave no stone unturned while trying to stop him from ever being President again.

I am sick of seeing the pro Liz Cheney commercials with her dad trash-talking about Trump.

Their wet dream is to find or plant evidence of a federal crime, even better if they can execute him for it. Public execution would put the cherry on top.
 
Last edited:
greysage

greysage

On The Level
Countrymouse said:
This article deserves to be fully quoted. This is the first time I am hearing of this.

I wonder, NOW, how President Trump got ANYTHING done. He was SURROUNDED by scoundrels, betrayers, and traitors--EVERYWHERE--even in his own home.

The Scandal of the Secret Service’s Deleted Texts

amgreatness.com

The Scandal of the Secret Service’s Deleted Texts › American Greatness

Before and during Donald Trump’s time in the White House, powerful federal agencies aligned to sabotage his candidacy and then his presidency. Once-trusted entities such as the FBI…
amgreatness.com amgreatness.com

Before and during Donald Trump’s time in the White House, powerful federal agencies aligned to sabotage his candidacy and then his presidency. Once-trusted entities such as the FBI, the intelligence community, and even parts of the U.S. military have burned their credibility by abandoning their missions to instead try to end Trump’s political career.


Does this include the Secret Service?


Unfortunately, the scandal over deleted texts related to January 6 demands the question.



Last month, the inspector general for the Department of Homeland Security, the agency that houses the Secret Service, officially informed Congress that text messages the office sought as part of its investigation into the Capitol protest were gone.


“The Department notified us that many U.S. Secret Service (USS) text messages, from January 5 and 6, 2021, were erased as part of a device-replacement program,” Dr. Joseph Cuffari wrote on July 13. “The USS erased those text messages after OIG requested records of electronic communications from the USS, as part of our evaluation of events at the Capitol on January 6,” an investigation Cuffari launched in February 2021.


Cuffari, a Trump appointee, addressed his letter to the Senate and House Homeland Security committees; the chair of the House Homeland Security committee is Representative Bennie Thomspon (D-Miss.) who also heads the January 6 select committee. On January 16, 2021, Congressional Democrats instructed DHS and other key federal agencies to retain all records involving the events of January 6.


Eleven days later, texts on cell phones used by multiple Secret Service officials and agents on duty on January 6 were erased.



A Secret Service spokesman indignantly downplayed the news. “The insinuation that the Secret Service maliciously deleted text messages following a request is false,” Anthony Guglielmi, communications director for the Secret Service, wrote in a statement on July 14. Mobile devices were reset to factory settings on January 27, 2021 as a result of a “system migration” in the works for three months, Guglielmi insisted. “DHS OIG requested electronic communications for the first time on Feb. 26, 2021, after the migration was well under way.”


A few days later, he admitted the texts “probably were not recoverable.”


Despite Guglielmi’s spin, congressional leaders had already asked DHS officials to produce “all documents and materials that refer or relate to events that could or ultimately did transpire on January 6” before Cuffari opened his inquiry. The devices were evidence in a congressional investigation; failing to archive backups of phones belonging to any DHS employee even remotely tied to what happened on January 6 is highly suspect if not a federal offense.


And the purge did not happen while Trump or his Homeland Security chief were in charge. Between Congress’ first request for DHS to retain all records associated with January 6 and the cell phone “reset” on January 27, 2021, Joe Biden became president—which means the deletions happened on his watch. (David Pekoske, Biden’s current director of the Transportation Safety Administration and a Trump holdover, temporarily served as DHS chief from January 20 until February 2, 2021 when Alejandro Mayorkas was confirmed by the Senate.)


So Joe Biden’s DHS is thwarting the internal January 6 investigation—and Cuffari warned congressional Democrats at least twice of the department’s noncooperation.



“During this reporting period, the Department significantly delayed OIG’s access to Department records, thereby impeding the progress of OIG’s review of the January 6 events at the Capitol,” Cuffari wrote in a semiannual report released in September 2021. “The Department repeatedly suggested that OIG might not have a right of access to the records sought, but during the months-long period in which access was delayed the Department did not cite any legal authority—that would have justified withholding the information.” A follow-up report published in March 2022 again warned that “access to Secret Service records [is] impeding the progress of our January 6, 2021 review.”


Bennie Thompson presumably received both reports. Why didn’t he act?


Turns out the controversy reaches the highest levels of the Secret Service in Washington, D.C. To expand his investigation last summer, Cuffari specifically asked DHS for all text messages sent or received by 24 Secret Service officials between December 7, 2020 and January 8, 2021. These weren’t random low-level agents; the list includes James Murray, the director of the Secret Service who just delayed his new gig at Snapchat to remain in the position as the scandal escalates, and Robert Engel, head of Trump’s detail.


The trove presumably would contain thousands of messages and perhaps hundreds just from January 5 and 6. But in response to a subpoena by the January 6 select committee, the Secret Service revealed a bombshell: they could only find one text. The agency then informed the committee that it “did not have any further records responsive to DHS OIG’s request for text messages” but will research whether “such texts are recoverable.”


To recap: Joe Biden’s DHS allowed a purge of Secret Service cell phone data without mandating and archiving content, is stonewalling an internal investigation into what Joe Biden insists is a terrorist attack comparable to 9/11, and now shrugs off the fact that texts from 24 Secret Service employees including the head of agency over a crucial one-month period might be gone for good.


Given those revelations, one would assume the January 6 committee and House Democrats would be livid at DHS officials and calling for heads to roll. They are—but they want Cuffari’s head.


Just a few days after Cuffari announced a criminal probe into the missing texts, Thompson and Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, asked for Cuffari’s resignation for failing “to inform Congress of this serious and flagrant violation of federal records laws.” In a follow-up letter on August 1, Thompson and Maloney accused Cuffari of “secretly abandon[ing] efforts” to collect the missing texts, an allegation that defies logic since Cuffari is the official who first publicly exposed the scandal.



Nevertheless, Thompson and Maloney asked Cuffari again to “step aside from this matter and for a new IG to be appointed in light of revelations that you had failed to keep Congress informed of your inability to obtain key information from the Secret Service.”


Biden reportedly is considering ousting Cuffari from his post; White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters last week that “we’re looking at the facts and the situation it is being investigated.”


Cuffari, for now, is standing his ground but it appears the Secret Service is attempting an end-around to further frustrate his investigation. The agency reportedly turned over the cell phone numbers of the 24 Secret Service agents in question to both the January 6 committee and the Justice Department in violation of a stand down order by Cuffari’s office not to interfere in its ongoing criminal inquiry.


Why the subterfuge? Would the texts finally explain why Kamala Harris, under Secret Service protection at the time, went to the Democratic National Committee headquarters the morning of January 6, the same place where a pipe bomb allegedly was found that afternoon? How did agents miss the explosive during a security sweep of the premises before she arrived? How did agents not locate the device for more than an hour while Harris remained in the building until law enforcement allegedly found it?


Would the public find out why the Secret Service made the decision to return Trump to the White House after his speech at the Ellipse against his wishes? Would testimony by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, particularly claims that Trump attempted to carjack his own presidential vehicle and strangle Robert Engel that afternoon, be debunked?



Would the mystery of Vice President Mike Pence’s exact whereabouts be solved? As the chaos unfolded that afternoon, what exactly did the Secret Service do? And if the situation was so dangerous, why didn’t they evacuate Trump from the White House? Were agents involved in the evacuation of top congressional leaders, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to Fort McNair around 3:00 p.m. on January 6?


Communications between Secret Service brass and agents in charge of protecting Trump, Harris, Pence, and Joe Biden that day almost certainly answer most if not all of those questions. And it’s the Biden regime and Democrats, not Trump or Joseph Cuffari, concealing the truth.






About Julie Kelly
Julie Kelly is a political commentator and senior contributor to American Greatness. She is the author of January 6: How Democrats Used the Capitol Protest to Launch a War on Terror Against the Political Right and Disloyal Opposition: How the NeverTrump Right Tried―And Failed―To Take Down the President. Her past work can be found at The Federalist and National Review. She also has been featured in the Wall Street Journal, The Hill, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, and Genetic Literacy Project. She is the co-host of the “Happy Hour Podcast with Julie and Liz.” She is a graduate of Eastern Illinois University and lives in suburban Chicago with her husband and two daughters.

Click to expand...

Thank you! Twitter no longer lets me view stuff.
 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
A man after Bill Ayers and Obama’s heart...

Former FBI Deputy Assistant Director Terry Turchie says Merrick Garland would not sign off on a warrant to raid the Unabomber, but signed off on a warrant to raid Trump.
FZ5-QZcXwAMAFmz

RT 5min
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1557877224052707328
View: https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1557877224052707328?t=giHqWZ5EkkgwmlET-4HlSQ&s=19
 
mzkitty

mzkitty

I give up.
1660264013956.png

August 11, 2022 08:20 PM


FBI agents appear to have been on the hunt for classified documents related to nuclear weapons during their raid of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort on Monday, according to a report.

Sources told the Washington Post that such classified information was among the items agents look for in the search, but declined to speak about any other materials that may have been sought. It remains unclear whether they found any nuclear documents.

Amid a political firestorm, in which Trump has decried the raid as being politically motivated, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced Thursday that he had personally approved the FBI’s decision to seek a search warrant.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

FBI agents in Trump Mar-a-Lago raid sought nuclear weapons documents: Report - Washington Examiner

FBI agents appear to have been on the hunt for classified documents related to nuclear weapons during their raid of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort on Monday, according to a report. Sources told the Washington Post that such classified information was among the items agents...
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
 
dawgofwar10

dawgofwar10

Veteran Member
mzkitty said:
View attachment 356684

August 11, 2022 08:20 PM


FBI agents appear to have been on the hunt for classified documents related to nuclear weapons during their raid of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort on Monday, according to a report.

Sources told the Washington Post that such classified information was among the items agents look for in the search, but declined to speak about any other materials that may have been sought. It remains unclear whether they found any nuclear documents.

Amid a political firestorm, in which Trump has decried the raid as being politically motivated, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced Thursday that he had personally approved the FBI’s decision to seek a search warrant.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

FBI agents in Trump Mar-a-Lago raid sought nuclear weapons documents: Report - Washington Examiner

FBI agents appear to have been on the hunt for classified documents related to nuclear weapons during their raid of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort on Monday, according to a report. Sources told the Washington Post that such classified information was among the items agents...
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
Click to expand...
They sure found some Nuclear Weapons to really, really piss of a lot of Americans!!!!!!!
 
TruthQuest

TruthQuest

Life Student
There's some confusion here on how things work if evidence of a crime is found that is not listed on a warrant. There is a "plain sight" rule. If found in plain sight no new warrant is needed and it can result in new charges separate from the warrant. But, there is a limit to that. For instance, if a search warrant is being executed for say a "sawed off shotgun", then any reasonable place to look for that shotgun can lead to other evidence found in "plain site." If an LE found drugs in a shoe box, a bread box, or a small night stand drawer, in would be inadmissible as none of those places would be normal places to look in the execution of such warrant. If they opened a closet door and found a walk in closet containing a small illegal grow room, that would be admissible to file new charges. Such a closet find would be in "plain site" during the execution of my example warrant (for a sawed off shotgun).

TruthQuest

P.S. Not saying I agree with this.
 
Lilbitsnana

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
TruthQuest said:
There's some confusion here on how things work if evidence of a crime is found that is not listed on a warrant. There is a "plain sight" rule. If found in plain sight no new warrant is needed and it can result in new charges separate from the warrant. But, there is a limit to that. For instance, if a search warrant is being executed for say a "sawed off shotgun", then any reasonable place to look for that shotgun can lead to other evidence found in "plain site." If an LE found drugs in a shoe box, a bread box, or a small night stand drawer, in would be inadmissible as none of those places would be normal places to look in the execution of such warrant. If they opened a closet door and found a walk in closet containing a small illegal grow room, that would be admissible to file new charges. Such a closet find would be in "plain site" during the execution of my example warrant (for a sawed off shotgun).

TruthQuest

P.S. Not saying I agree with this.
Click to expand...

Thank you.
 
N

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
Countrymouse said:
Here's what one poster put up as a commentary on the above:

John Rich
@johnrich
·
15h

A BIG thank you to Joe's FBI for raiding Trump's home! You guys just poured 81 million gallons of premium Patriot octane on an already blazing Freedom fire! See, you are good for something after all:) Much appreciated! See you in November!
Click to expand...

For reference, this "John Rich" is half of the Country Duo "Big and Rich" with "Big Kenny".

This is one of their best songs as it tells the story of November 8th 1965

Kris Kristopherson opens up the story for them.

 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top