Misc Trump Has This

Starrkopf

Veteran Member
All true.

That being said, all of that can literally change in the blink of an eye if both parties decide to play by the same "no rules" rules and the welrods come out.....
Serious question: what do you mean by both parties? the Republicans? they are all sold out and working in concert with the democrats on this one, with possibly a few exceptions. I don't have a lot of faith in them suddenly growing a conscience at the 11th hour and saving the day when there's mountains of evidence that they never really wanted to save anything except their personal income stream.
 

Starrkopf

Veteran Member
I'm beginning to wonder if, in fact, Trump is more and more becoming "SURROUNDED" in the White House---as fewer and fewer IN WASHINGTON support or even acknowledge him as President (NOT in the country as a whole, where he is WELL loved and supported, but in the pit of snakes known as DC).

This will be the first President removed by massively being PUT ON IGNORE by:
the entire election system and all of its overlords
the local courts
the State courts
the regional courts
the Supreme Court
the House of Representatives
The US Senate
the Speaker of the House
The Senate Majority leader
leaders of his own Republican party
almost ALL Republican elected officials
increasing numbers of "It's over / I've-given-up" conservative talk-show hosts
the CIA and FBI (actually both actively working AGAINST him)
the media/MSM news
social media
almost every political pundit in the US (except some conservative ones)

the ONLY group that "may" still be on his "side" is the military--and THAT is coming more and more into question

He is being SURROUNDED---

and if this were a war, and these were armies---

the wisest course of action at this point would be raising a white flag or finding a way of escape...........

I think you are spot on, except for the military part I don't see them coming to the rescue just like I don't see law enforcement doing anything but following orders, (including keeping republican electors out of the capitol in MI)

Thing is, the voters have no authority government works through people in offices that have the authority to command down the chain and if nobody responsible for holding them accountable in other branches wants to do their job, or is in agreement then the fact that they didn't honor the written law or even the constitution doesn't matter. We may have god given rights as a matter of principle but in reality we only have what rights the government chooses to enforce or deny us at any given time because an oath to uphold those rights and principles is only as good as the oath taker and the oath is just a legal formality these days for many and when you get right down to it we've taught people that principles are a very fickle and flexible thing depending on the situation rather than something ironclad. our culture is a reflection of what's happening in government right now, we are a lawless people and so our government is also lawless (except when it suits them)
 

INVAR

Sword At-The-Ready
We may have god given rights as a matter of principle but in reality we only have what rights the government chooses to enforce or deny us at any given time because an oath to uphold those rights and principles is only as good as the oath taker and the oath is just a legal formality these days for many and when you get right down to it we've taught people that principles are a very fickle and flexible thing depending on the situation rather than something ironclad. our culture is a reflection of what's happening in government right now, we are a lawless people and so our government is also lawless

Which speaks to the point you made on another thread about Conservatives losing elections because of what you called 'purity' to principles when the Democrats are never divided and stick together no matter what.

When principles are abandoned for pragmatism in the hopes of 'winning' - then liberty loses. Our society loses.
And lose we have.

You pointed out that the Democrats 'win' elections by using a strategy of 'pragmatism over principle' - to which I would argue that no - that is incorrect. The Democrats have only ONE principle in which there is no compromise or wavering: obtain power by any and all means. Lying, cheating, fraud, murder, extortion, bribery.... any method that obtains political power is the only principle by which they are governed by in reality.

Our side cannot mimic such principle because it requires the abandonment of all the other foundational principles that make liberty even possible. The Democrats are not hamstrung by that - because they have no principles besides obtaining raw power to rule by force.

Single issue voting, if it is tied to a fundamental principle, like life - cannot be discarded for pragmatism to obtain power - because when we have done so - we become no different than the Democrats - and truly become indiscernible from Democrats as the Republican party has. We will continue to vote for the lesser of evils until our choices become a choice between Hitler or Stalin.

"Conservatism works every time it is tried" Limbaugh used to preach. But even he abandoned that truth for the promise of pragmatism - to the destruction of the movement he himself considered himself a leader of.

Without the principles by which our liberty is rooted - there is no liberty - only license and power. Which is how you arrive at tyranny. Pragmatism simply means compromise, and when you have compromised liberty for the promise of power - you lose both.
 

Starrkopf

Veteran Member
Which speaks to the point you made on another thread about Conservatives losing elections because of what you called 'purity' to principles when the Democrats are never divided and stick together no matter what.

When principles are abandoned for pragmatism in the hopes of 'winning' - then liberty loses. Our society loses.
And lose we have.

You pointed out that the Democrats 'win' elections by using a strategy of 'pragmatism over principle' - to which I would argue that no - that is incorrect. The Democrats have only ONE principle in which there is no compromise or wavering: obtain power by any and all means. Lying, cheating, fraud, murder, extortion, bribery.... any method that obtains political power is the only principle by which they are governed by in reality.

Our side cannot mimic such principle because it requires the abandonment of all the other foundational principles that make liberty even possible. The Democrats are not hamstrung by that - because they have no principles besides obtaining raw power to rule by force.

Single issue voting, if it is tied to a fundamental principle, like life - cannot be discarded for pragmatism to obtain power - because when we have done so - we become no different than the Democrats - and truly become indiscernible from Democrats as the Republican party has. We will continue to vote for the lesser of evils until our choices become a choice between Hitler or Stalin.

"Conservatism works every time it is tried" Limbaugh used to preach. But even he abandoned that truth for the promise of pragmatism - to the destruction of the movement he himself considered himself a leader of.

Without the principles by which our liberty is rooted - there is no liberty - only license and power. Which is how you arrive at tyranny. Pragmatism simply means compromise, and when you have compromised liberty for the promise of power - you lose both.

While that is true, the problem remains that if only one side plays by a set of rules that only exist inside their own mind and the other side plays by no rules then those bound by rules will be overtaken.

edit:
furthermore, we have never held our side accountable to not holding up our values we kept voting in the same losers that did jack shit over and over again while being duped time and time again by what they said they would do but conveniently forget to do once they get in office. We got duped by right wing media promising that things would get better if we just keep re-electing the same people. It took the election of Trump to see what we could do if we had actually really been fighting this whole time, but we also found out that we started fighting way too late, we should have fought this hard back in the 70s, 80s and 90s.
 
Last edited:

Sub-Zero

Veteran Member
McConnell Urges Senators to Refrain from Objecting to Electoral Votes

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) reportedly urged GOP senators to refrain from objecting to electoral votes when it comes time to count them in Congress next month, making the remarks on a caucus call Tuesday.

McConnell warned that any GOP senator who signed onto a House Republican objection to a state’s electoral votes would then force the Senate to debate and vote on the objection, putting fellow GOP senators in a bad position.

McConnell was not the only Republican leader to make the request, with Republican Whip John Thune (R-SD) and Rules Committee Chairman Roy Blunt (R-MO) making the same call.
So?

Rand Paul.
 

auxman

Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit...
His wife's name is Chao.
Elaine Chao is the current Secretary of Transportation. From Wikipedia:

Elaine Chao was born in Taipei, Taiwan on March 26, 1953 and immigrated to the United States when she was eight years old.[4] She is the eldest of six daughters of Ruth Mulan Chu Chao, a historian, and James S.C. Chao, who began his career as a merchant mariner and in 1964 founded a shipping company in New York City. The company, Foremost Maritime Corporation, developed into the Foremost Group; as of 2013, James S.C. Chao continued to serve as its Chairman,[5] later succeeded by Elaine's sister Angela.[6] James first met Ruth when she and her family relocated to Shanghai during World War II. In 1949, James and Ruth relocated separately to Taiwan at the culmination of the Chinese Civil War. They married in 1950. In 1961, Elaine came to the United States on a 37-day freight ship journey along with her mother and two younger sisters. Her father had arrived in New York three years earlier after receiving a scholarship.[7][8]
 

INVAR

Sword At-The-Ready
So?

Rand Paul.

Rand Paul isn't Majority Leader in the Senate. He does not control Committee assignments and agendas - McConnell does.

Rand Paul is not going to do shit but talk about it - and if he does, McConnell will drum him out of the Senate. it's not like those two like each other much.
 

jward

passin' thru
There are no fruits to show that any criminality, sedition, treason, malfeasance, bribery, graft, or criminality perpetrated by any high level Democrat in office or connected to high office during the last 10 years has been arrested and charged with what they got away with. Benghazi, the IRS scandal, E-mail servers in bathrooms, lying to Congress etc., etc.

That is fact. Lerner, Hildabeast, Strzok, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Steele, Page, McCabe, Ohr, Rice and Yates are all living their lives making mint and free of the threat of any indictments for what they had done. Some of it blatant and in-our-face.

Since that pattern has been clearly established, and Bill Barr continues to run Interference for the Deep State Players even to this day - why is it absurd to ask for evidence that something is going to be done about this current election lawlessness after you accused me of being a defeatist for stating the fact that no one in any institution of authority gives a shit or is going to do anything about the election fraud that took place?

We have that pattern established. We are watching it play out again in real-time. No one in any institution of authority gives a rat's ass about the election fraud and no one in authority is going to be able to do anything about it.

I dare point out that obvious truth, yet I am declared the defeatist by those who say they are interested in the truth.

Curious.

There has been no consequence for those people, but we're talking specifically about DJT and his FOUR year term, not the last decade, and not whatever new manner in which you re-frame your point.

I imagine the reason he's not addressed those grievances to date is the same reason you don't stop dealing with a cardiac event to swab a diaper rash.

The game board may, or may not, have changed considerable with DJT at the helm, and ready to put unknown #s of dangly bits in untold #s of vices, but again, we, you, and I do not know. Its above our pay-grade. It remains absurd to think that we are privy to any of the stratagem being employed by our leaders or those of any other nation.

The teams this go around are not defined by party or by nation's boundaries. It may prove to be that no authority in this country fulfills it's duties, and that the reset falls to us. I never claimed that couldn't be one of the outcomes.

My only contention has been with the idea that it is possible for you to sit where you sit, mid machination of this inning of the great game, and presume to know, better than DJT himself, what course he'd be best served by choosing. Time alone will answer these questions, and even then they will be, at best, ephemeral answers that change with time and man's understanding of the time.
 

jward

passin' thru
Yes. You've put it together nicely. I had forgotten to put in.dot #1, but it only adds.

I suspect there could be arrests Christmas weekend. But, they could also let it play out until Jan 6. I think if Trump is elected by the US House of Representatives that the Dumbocrats will take it to the SC. The USSC would refuse to hear the case based on their previous refusal to hear it before (based on one several states disenfranchising the votes of the rest). Boom. Trump is inaugurated.

It's one possible path, at least.
Your summation reminded me that Sidney is supposedly licensed as a military lawyer and thus able to prosecute at military tribunals. :hmm:
 

INVAR

Sword At-The-Ready
My only contention has been with the idea that it is possible for you to sit where you sit, mid machination of this inning of the great game, and presume to know, better than DJT himself, what course he'd be best served by choosing.

Reading comprehension please. I did not suggest what course I think Trump should choose. I have been specific about the fact that NOTHING is going to happen in regards to all the evidence of fraud that took place this election.

I provided you patterns and evidence of that fact. You discount them because I went back 10 years and you insist that I must set the parameters to only pertain to Trump in office for 4 years???? Who are you to set the criteria of what can be considered a pattern of behavior in regards to lawlessness? The very people involved in framing Trump and spying on his campaign in 2016 have not even had their hands slapped, but you want to argue against that assessment with a 'game board' word salad?

I'm not giving Trump any advice by my posting here. I'm expressing my thoughts as I see them and trying to wake up people so high on Bogus Hopium that we are going to have to create a new word to define the kind of denial they are in.
 

jward

passin' thru
Yes. When discussing DJTs response, or lack there of, you must limit yourself to the time he's in the drivers seat.
Yes. There is a tectonic shift in the game board. As we've said ad nausuem, this time everyone is playing for all the marbles.
 

INVAR

Sword At-The-Ready
That's your problem. I'm not talking about TRUMP'S RESPONSE or lack thereof. I'm talking about every single government authority that has jurisdiction over handling election fraud, criminality, treason, sedition, bribery, maleficence etc. They are not going to do jack and shit and are going to cover up and excuse all of it or ignore it.

They have rendered Trump neutered and irrelevant.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
That's your problem. I'm not talking about TRUMP'S RESPONSE or lack thereof. I'm talking about every single government authority that has jurisdiction over handling election fraud, criminality, treason, sedition, bribery, maleficence etc. They are not going to do jack and shit and are going to cover up and excuse all of it or ignore it.

They have rendered Trump neutered and irrelevant.


BOOM. Spot. On.
 

auxman

Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit...
@REX@social.quodverum.com REX (@REX@social.quodverum.com)-There is no mystery as to why Mitch McConnell is ditching Trump.Cocaine Mitch is fundamentally compromised by the CCP.Love or loathe them, the CCP have done an incredible job infiltrating American power. This is a major crisis and an inflection point in US history.McConnell is classic GOPe swamp. He used Trump. Now he calculates that Trump is finished, he is ditching him.One problem - Donald J Trump is WAY smarter than Mitch McConnell.As will be seen. How McConnell and Chao used political power to make their family rich
By Larry GetlenMarch 17, 2018 | 10:26pm | Updated
How McConnell and Chao used political power to make their family rich

EPASecret Empires by Peter Schweizer
Peter Schweizer, who delved into the Clinton Foundation’s dealings in 2016’s “Clinton Cash,” has turned his sights to the money-making machinations of DC’s political elite.

His new book, “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,” — due out Tuesday from Harper Collins — exposes how politicians engage in “corruption by proxy” by exploiting family and business ties to enrich themselves and their relatives.

Here, The Post’s Larry Getlen details the book’s revelations on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, ex-Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker and others:

In 2004, current Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and his wife, current US Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, had an average net worth of $3.1 million. Ten years later, that number had increased to somewhere between $9.2 million and $36.5 million.


One source of the windfall, according to a new book from Peter Schweizer, was a 2008 gift from Chao’s father, James Chao, for somewhere between $5 million and $25 million. But this gift could be seen as more than just a gift. It may have been acquired, according to Schweizer, thanks to the couple’s fealty to China, the source of the Chao family fortune. And that fealty may have occurred at the expense of the nation they had pledged to serve.

“Secret Empires,” the new book from the “Clinton Cash” and “Throw Them All Out” author, details myriad examples of corruption from members of both major political parties. Rather than focusing on direct forms of corruption, such as bribes, Schweizer hones in on the more indirect graft of the modern era.



‘Current ethics laws create a zero accountability zone for the Washington, D.C., political class.’
Rather than risk their careers taking bribes for potentially minuscule rewards, Schweizer points out how today’s politicians are savvier, engaging in what he calls “corruption by proxy.”

While politicians and their spouses are often subject to rigid regulations on what gifts they can accept and what sort of business they can conduct, others around them — like their friends or children have no such obstacles. So while a politician could theoretically wind up in prison for accepting $10,000 for doling out favors, establishing overseas connections that could land your children multi-million-dollar deals is harder to detect, and often legal.

“Foreign governments and oligarchs like this form of corruption because it gives them private and unfettered gateways to the corridors of Washington power,” Schweizer writes. “Foreign entities cannot legally make campaign contributions, so using this approach creates an alternative way to curry favor and influence America’s political leaders. Simply camouflaging these transactions as business agreements provides another shield of plausible deniability.”


As Schweizer tells it, the Chao family fortune derives from the Foremost Group, a shipping company that Chinese native James Chao, a classmate of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin at Jiao Tong University, founded in New York in 1964. Chao remains Foremost’s chairman today, and his daughters Angela and Christine are the company’s deputy chairwoman and general counsel, respectively. Elaine Chao worked there in the 1970s, and has been quoted as saying, “Shipping is our family tradition.”

The success of Foremost is largely due to its close ties to the Chinese government, in particular the China State Shipbuilding Corp. (CSSC), a corporation with which Foremost has done “large volumes of business.”

The CSSC, Schweizer writes, is “a state-owned defense conglomerate … at the heart of the Chinese government’s military-industrial complex.” The main goal of the CSSC is to strengthen the Chinese military. James and Angela Chao have both sat on the board of a CSSC offshoot.


While Foremost is an American company, “their ships have been constructed by Chinese government shipyards, and some of their construction financed by the Chinese government.” In addition, writes Schweizer, “their crews are largely Chinese,” despite US Transportation Secretary and company founder’s daughter Elaine Chao having once said that “ships crewed by Americans are ‘a vital part of our national security.’”

Given all this, it’s worth noting how both McConnell and Chao, in their roles as high-ranking US officials, have personally interacted with, and then gone considerably soft on, China since their 1993 wedding.

When Senator McConnell — who took hardline positions against China prior to his marriage — met with high-ranking Chinese officials in 1994, it was not in his capacity as senator, but via a personal invitation from the CSSC arranged by James Chao. McConnell met with Zemin, then the country’s president, and vice-premiere Li Lanqing. After this meeting, McConnell “would increasingly avoid public criticism of China.” More meetings like it would follow in the years to come.

“As the Chaos and the Chinese government went into business together, the Chaos-McConnells tied their economic fate to the good fortunes of Beijing,” Schweizer writes. “Were McConnell to critique Beijing aggressively or support policies damaging to Chinese interests, Beijing could severely damage the family’s economic fortunes.”
In the ensuing years, McConnell has loudly defended China in its actions against Hong Kong and Taiwan, even claiming that “the United States needed to be ‘ambiguous’ as to whether we would come to the defense of Taiwan if attacked by China.” When Sen. Jesse Helms introduced the Taiwan Security Enhancement Act, pledging support for Taiwanese independence, in 1999, it had “twenty-one co-sponsors and heavy Republican support. But McConnell was not on the list.”

When Congress required China to document annual progress on human rights in order to maintain its trade status in the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square massacre, ditching the requirement became a priority for the country. In 2000, “McConnell cosponsored S.2277, which would do just that.”

McConnell also fought attempts to punish China for vigorously undervaluing its currency, a tactic that led Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to invoke the nuclear option, changing Senate rules on voting. The bill passed, 63-35, with McConnell voting against.

REX/ShutterstockChao has also done her part to support her ancestral home.

When she served as Secretary of Labor under George W. Bush, her department resisted efforts to “call out the Chinese government over its workers rights practices.” When a petition was filed against China on the subject of worker’s rights based on the US Trade Act of 1974, Chao opposed it.

After a bipartisan congressional report citing Chinese espionage against the US circulated in 2000, Chao “was critical of the report,” making clear she “in no way” agreed with its findings, and, Schweizer writes, “dismiss[ing] the idea that China could pose any threat to the United States."

This dishonest double-dealing works on both sides of the political aisle. Schweizer notes the case of Penny Pritzker, US Commerce Secretary during President Obama’s second term, and heir to the Hyatt Hotel fortune.

Pritzker met Barack and Michelle Obama when Barack was a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and her family and the Obamas became fast friends, vacationing together regularly.

Throughout Barack Obama’s political career, Pritzker has been one of his major donors and bundlers. When Pritzker became Commerce Secretary in 2013, she resigned from Hyatt’s board and other potentially conflicting obligations, but maintained her ownership of $400 million in Hyatt stock — Hyatt was a major government contractor — as well as “the vast bulk of her real estate holdings.”

This included Artemis Real Estate, a “private equity real estate investment manager” that “raised $736 million to be used to purchase office buildings. With her White House connections, the federal government, including the government department Pritzker would later head, became a profitable tenant for Artemis and the Pritzker empire.”

In 2013, Artemis purchased the mixed-use Alexandria, VA, complex known as the Carlyle Center, which housed the offices of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which is part of the Commerce Department.

“That meant that the commerce secretary could be seen as, in effect, the landlord of the Department of Commerce. The annual rent: $1.4 million.”

While Pritzker was Commerce Secretary, Artemis purchased, alone or in joint ventures, buildings that brought in over $1.6 million in annual rent from separate US government tenants.

Penny PritzkerGetty Images for FORTUNE
Even more blatant and convoluted, “some tenants of Pritzker-owned companies also received Department of Commerce contracts and money from Pritzker.”

Pritzker bought a 102,000-square-foot industrial space in Huntington, CA, in 2013, and gave a 10-year lease worth $9.1 million to aircraft company Driessen Aircraft Interior Systems. Driessen’s parent company, Zodiac Aerospace, is regulated by the Department of Commerce. Another of their subsidiaries, Zodiac of North America, received almost $800,000 in contracts from Secretary Pritzker.

Money flowed not just to collaborators and tenants, but to family as well. In 2015, a Chicago-based company called Clean Energy Trust won a $10 million grant from the Commerce Department. It was the only Chicago company so rewarded. The company’s co-chair was Nick Pritzker, Penny Pritzker’s cousin.

This ethical looseness is endemic throughout the federal government. Schweizer documents how it has spread like a virus through Congress, where the lines between members, their families, and lobbying groups have become indistinguishable.

Take Republican Congressman Denny Rehberg, who formed the US- Mongolia Friendship Caucus. Why was Rehberg, a Montana rancher, concerned about US relations with Mongolia? Perhaps because his son, A.J. Rehberg, worked for the Washington lobbying firm Gage, whose clients included the Mongolian government. Gage later cited their accomplishments on that government’s behalf to include “formation of the US Mongolia Congressional Caucus.”

Democrat Loretta Sanchez, who served in Congress from 1997-2017, developed a relationship with her military escort, Jack Einwechter, whom she married in 2011. Along the way, Einwechter left the military for a more lucrative career as a lobbyist.

As Sanchez served on the House Armed Services Committee and the House Committee on Homeland Security, Einwechter lobbied on behalf of clients including arms manufacturer Heckler & Koch, aerospace company Oregon Aero, and other potential military contractors.

Shortly after the Kurdistan Regional Government hired Einwechter to represent their interests, Sanchez joined the Kurdish-American Congressional Caucus.

The list of congress members who have had lobbyist children over the years is long and disturbing. They include former Senator Trent Lott’s son Chet, who was “managing Domino’s Pizza franchises in Lexington, KY, when he decided to spin policy instead of pizza,” and current Senator Orrin Hatch, who, along with his son Scott — a lobbyist for the likes of Schering-Plough, Bayer, Colgate-Palmolive, GlaxoSmithKline and more — have been the best friends the diet supplement industry ever had, helping them avoid government oversight.

And Hunter Biden and Chris Heinz — son and stepson, respectively, of Joe Biden and John Kerry — created an international private equity firm that formed deals with foreign governments, including an investment fund in a joint venture with the Bank of China, at the same time their fathers were working with those governments on highly sensitive political matters.

If we’re to have a truly representative democracy, Schweizer argues, we need to be able to trust that our elected representatives are serving the people who elected them, not the entities filling their pockets — and the pockets of their families and friends.

“Current ethics laws create a zero accountability zone for the Washington, D.C., political class,” he writes.

“If we are to remain an effective constitutional republic, we must face and win the war on corruption at home. We must not tolerate public service as a front for family enrichment and elite will to power. It is un- American, and has direct and dire effects on policy-making and good governance.”

Editor’s Note: According to Chris Heinz’s publicist, while Biden and Heinz were co-owners of the parent company in question, Heinz had no involvement in the joint venture with the Bank of China, or in the offshoot of their firm that did that deal.
 
Last edited:

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
@REX@social.quodverum.com REX (@REX@social.quodverum.com)-There is no mystery as to why Mitch McConnell is ditching Trump.Cocaine Mitch is fundamentally compromised by the CCP.Love or loathe them, the CCP have done an incredible job infiltrating American power. This is a major crisis and an inflection point in US history.McConnell is classic GOPe swamp. He used Trump. Now he calculates that Trump is finished, he is ditching him.One problem - Donald J Trump is WAY smarter than Mitch McConnell.As will be seen. How McConnell and Chao used political power to make their family rich
By Larry GetlenMarch 17, 2018 | 10:26pm | Updated
How McConnell and Chao used political power to make their family rich

EPASecret Empires by Peter Schweizer
Peter Schweizer, who delved into the Clinton Foundation’s dealings in 2016’s “Clinton Cash,” has turned his sights to the money-making machinations of DC’s political elite.

His new book, “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,” — due out Tuesday from Harper Collins — exposes how politicians engage in “corruption by proxy” by exploiting family and business ties to enrich themselves and their relatives.

Here, The Post’s Larry Getlen details the book’s revelations on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, ex-Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker and others:

In 2004, current Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and his wife, current US Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, had an average net worth of $3.1 million. Ten years later, that number had increased to somewhere between $9.2 million and $36.5 million.


One source of the windfall, according to a new book from Peter Schweizer, was a 2008 gift from Chao’s father, James Chao, for somewhere between $5 million and $25 million. But this gift could be seen as more than just a gift. It may have been acquired, according to Schweizer, thanks to the couple’s fealty to China, the source of the Chao family fortune. And that fealty may have occurred at the expense of the nation they had pledged to serve.

“Secret Empires,” the new book from the “Clinton Cash” and “Throw Them All Out” author, details myriad examples of corruption from members of both major political parties. Rather than focusing on direct forms of corruption, such as bribes, Schweizer hones in on the more indirect graft of the modern era.




Rather than risk their careers taking bribes for potentially minuscule rewards, Schweizer points out how today’s politicians are savvier, engaging in what he calls “corruption by proxy.”

While politicians and their spouses are often subject to rigid regulations on what gifts they can accept and what sort of business they can conduct, others around them — like their friends or children have no such obstacles. So while a politician could theoretically wind up in prison for accepting $10,000 for doling out favors, establishing overseas connections that could land your children multi-million-dollar deals is harder to detect, and often legal.

“Foreign governments and oligarchs like this form of corruption because it gives them private and unfettered gateways to the corridors of Washington power,” Schweizer writes. “Foreign entities cannot legally make campaign contributions, so using this approach creates an alternative way to curry favor and influence America’s political leaders. Simply camouflaging these transactions as business agreements provides another shield of plausible deniability.”


As Schweizer tells it, the Chao family fortune derives from the Foremost Group, a shipping company that Chinese native James Chao, a classmate of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin at Jiao Tong University, founded in New York in 1964. Chao remains Foremost’s chairman today, and his daughters Angela and Christine are the company’s deputy chairwoman and general counsel, respectively. Elaine Chao worked there in the 1970s, and has been quoted as saying, “Shipping is our family tradition.”

The success of Foremost is largely due to its close ties to the Chinese government, in particular the China State Shipbuilding Corp. (CSSC), a corporation with which Foremost has done “large volumes of business.”

The CSSC, Schweizer writes, is “a state-owned defense conglomerate … at the heart of the Chinese government’s military-industrial complex.” The main goal of the CSSC is to strengthen the Chinese military. James and Angela Chao have both sat on the board of a CSSC offshoot.


While Foremost is an American company, “their ships have been constructed by Chinese government shipyards, and some of their construction financed by the Chinese government.” In addition, writes Schweizer, “their crews are largely Chinese,” despite US Transportation Secretary and company founder’s daughter Elaine Chao having once said that “ships crewed by Americans are ‘a vital part of our national security.’”

Given all this, it’s worth noting how both McConnell and Chao, in their roles as high-ranking US officials, have personally interacted with, and then gone considerably soft on, China since their 1993 wedding.

When Senator McConnell — who took hardline positions against China prior to his marriage — met with high-ranking Chinese officials in 1994, it was not in his capacity as senator, but via a personal invitation from the CSSC arranged by James Chao. McConnell met with Zemin, then the country’s president, and vice-premiere Li Lanqing. After this meeting, McConnell “would increasingly avoid public criticism of China.” More meetings like it would follow in the years to come.

“As the Chaos and the Chinese government went into business together, the Chaos-McConnells tied their economic fate to the good fortunes of Beijing,” Schweizer writes. “Were McConnell to critique Beijing aggressively or support policies damaging to Chinese interests, Beijing could severely damage the family’s economic fortunes.”
In the ensuing years, McConnell has loudly defended China in its actions against Hong Kong and Taiwan, even claiming that “the United States needed to be ‘ambiguous’ as to whether we would come to the defense of Taiwan if attacked by China.” When Sen. Jesse Helms introduced the Taiwan Security Enhancement Act, pledging support for Taiwanese independence, in 1999, it had “twenty-one co-sponsors and heavy Republican support. But McConnell was not on the list.”

When Congress required China to document annual progress on human rights in order to maintain its trade status in the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square massacre, ditching the requirement became a priority for the country. In 2000, “McConnell cosponsored S.2277, which would do just that.”

McConnell also fought attempts to punish China for vigorously undervaluing its currency, a tactic that led Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to invoke the nuclear option, changing Senate rules on voting. The bill passed, 63-35, with McConnell voting against.

REX/ShutterstockChao has also done her part to support her ancestral home.

When she served as Secretary of Labor under George W. Bush, her department resisted efforts to “call out the Chinese government over its workers rights practices.” When a petition was filed against China on the subject of worker’s rights based on the US Trade Act of 1974, Chao opposed it.

After a bipartisan congressional report citing Chinese espionage against the US circulated in 2000, Chao “was critical of the report,” making clear she “in no way” agreed with its findings, and, Schweizer writes, “dismiss[ing] the idea that China could pose any threat to the United States."

This dishonest double-dealing works on both sides of the political aisle. Schweizer notes the case of Penny Pritzker, US Commerce Secretary during President Obama’s second term, and heir to the Hyatt Hotel fortune.

Pritzker met Barack and Michelle Obama when Barack was a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and her family and the Obamas became fast friends, vacationing together regularly.

Throughout Barack Obama’s political career, Pritzker has been one of his major donors and bundlers. When Pritzker became Commerce Secretary in 2013, she resigned from Hyatt’s board and other potentially conflicting obligations, but maintained her ownership of $400 million in Hyatt stock — Hyatt was a major government contractor — as well as “the vast bulk of her real estate holdings.”

This included Artemis Real Estate, a “private equity real estate investment manager” that “raised $736 million to be used to purchase office buildings. With her White House connections, the federal government, including the government department Pritzker would later head, became a profitable tenant for Artemis and the Pritzker empire.”

In 2013, Artemis purchased the mixed-use Alexandria, VA, complex known as the Carlyle Center, which housed the offices of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which is part of the Commerce Department.

“That meant that the commerce secretary could be seen as, in effect, the landlord of the Department of Commerce. The annual rent: $1.4 million.”

While Pritzker was Commerce Secretary, Artemis purchased, alone or in joint ventures, buildings that brought in over $1.6 million in annual rent from separate US government tenants.

Penny PritzkerGetty Images for FORTUNE
Even more blatant and convoluted, “some tenants of Pritzker-owned companies also received Department of Commerce contracts and money from Pritzker.”

Pritzker bought a 102,000-square-foot industrial space in Huntington, CA, in 2013, and gave a 10-year lease worth $9.1 million to aircraft company Driessen Aircraft Interior Systems. Driessen’s parent company, Zodiac Aerospace, is regulated by the Department of Commerce. Another of their subsidiaries, Zodiac of North America, received almost $800,000 in contracts from Secretary Pritzker.

Money flowed not just to collaborators and tenants, but to family as well. In 2015, a Chicago-based company called Clean Energy Trust won a $10 million grant from the Commerce Department. It was the only Chicago company so rewarded. The company’s co-chair was Nick Pritzker, Penny Pritzker’s cousin.

This ethical looseness is endemic throughout the federal government. Schweizer documents how it has spread like a virus through Congress, where the lines between members, their families, and lobbying groups have become indistinguishable.

Take Republican Congressman Denny Rehberg, who formed the US- Mongolia Friendship Caucus. Why was Rehberg, a Montana rancher, concerned about US relations with Mongolia? Perhaps because his son, A.J. Rehberg, worked for the Washington lobbying firm Gage, whose clients included the Mongolian government. Gage later cited their accomplishments on that government’s behalf to include “formation of the US Mongolia Congressional Caucus.”

Democrat Loretta Sanchez, who served in Congress from 1997-2017, developed a relationship with her military escort, Jack Einwechter, whom she married in 2011. Along the way, Einwechter left the military for a more lucrative career as a lobbyist.

As Sanchez served on the House Armed Services Committee and the House Committee on Homeland Security, Einwechter lobbied on behalf of clients including arms manufacturer Heckler & Koch, aerospace company Oregon Aero, and other potential military contractors.

Shortly after the Kurdistan Regional Government hired Einwechter to represent their interests, Sanchez joined the Kurdish-American Congressional Caucus.

The list of congress members who have had lobbyist children over the years is long and disturbing. They include former Senator Trent Lott’s son Chet, who was “managing Domino’s Pizza franchises in Lexington, KY, when he decided to spin policy instead of pizza,” and current Senator Orrin Hatch, who, along with his son Scott — a lobbyist for the likes of Schering-Plough, Bayer, Colgate-Palmolive, GlaxoSmithKline and more — have been the best friends the diet supplement industry ever had, helping them avoid government oversight.

And Hunter Biden and Chris Heinz — son and stepson, respectively, of Joe Biden and John Kerry — created an international private equity firm that formed deals with foreign governments, including an investment fund in a joint venture with the Bank of China, at the same time their fathers were working with those governments on highly sensitive political matters.

If we’re to have a truly representative democracy, Schweizer argues, we need to be able to trust that our elected representatives are serving the people who elected them, not the entities filling their pockets — and the pockets of their families and friends.

“Current ethics laws create a zero accountability zone for the Washington, D.C., political class,” he writes.

“If we are to remain an effective constitutional republic, we must face and win the war on corruption at home. We must not tolerate public service as a front for family enrichment and elite will to power. It is un- American, and has direct and dire effects on policy-making and good governance.”

Editor’s Note: According to Chris Heinz’s publicist, while Biden and Heinz were co-owners of the parent company in question, Heinz had no involvement in the joint venture with the Bank of China, or in the offshoot of their firm that did that deal.

Seems like there’s a lot of crime dynasties goin’ ‘round... Washington, state capitals, big businesses... Damn, what’s poor, honest folks gotta do, to keep afloat, let alone get ahead?

OA
 

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I still don't want you to leave. But, if you're too embarrassed to show up for a while, I'll understand.

Hell, maybe you'll even come around to the right way of thinking about things; who knows?

The dark side will never change ... just disinformation and sowing discord ... always. Commie tactic.
 

jward

passin' thru
When we started this discussion we "were" talking DJTs response though, specifically to his assertion of and response to voter fraud IIRC.

Obviously the govt authorities and agencies have failed to muster a pretense of doing their jobs.

Perhaps now that the kemp family friend had that tragic car accident some establishment folk will realize that accidents happen on streets all across this land every day, or perhaps they'll recall the DJT votes were cast by actual, armed, and very resolute people and be smart enough that self interest re calibrates the needle. Dunno. Can't know at this point
 

INVAR

Sword At-The-Ready
When we started this discussion we "were" talking DJTs response though, specifically to his assertion of and response to voter fraud IIRC.

Actually when we 'began' this discussion - this is what you replied to what I posted. I bolded the main point I was making, but you jumped into making this somehow about Trump's response.


INVAR said:
So? No one in any institution of authority gives a shit or is going to do anything about it.

If you are going to do something about it - you better do it like yesterday


I dunno Invar. You're a fella who posts the same ole defeatist line in a dusty and obscure corner of the interwebs- seen by dozens daily
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
When we started this discussion we "were" talking DJTs response though, specifically to his assertion of and response to voter fraud IIRC.

Obviously the govt authorities and agencies have failed to muster a pretense of doing their jobs.

Perhaps now that the kemp family friend had that tragic car accident some establishment folk will realize that accidents happen on streets all across this land every day, or perhaps they'll recall the DJT votes were cast by actual, armed, and very resolute people and be smart enough that self interest re calibrates the needle. Dunno. Can't know at this point


I doubt that. You heard, I presume, that the GBI Investigator who was looking into the death of Kemp's daughter's BOYFRIEND (not just a "family friend') who was a Kelly Leoffler regional campaign staffer (not just some grunt knocking on doors, but a significant "organizer" in her campaign)--

Well, NOW THAT GBI INVESTIGATOR HAS TURNED UP DEAD---supposedly by "suicide."


SO--"ARKANCIDE" has come to Georgia.



Kemp will CLEARLY get the message---today, your daughter's boyfriend (near-fiance?)---and ANYONE WHO GETS IN OUR WAY eliminating him QUIETLY to affect this VITAL Senate election--------Tomorrow..............????
 

jward

passin' thru
And tomorrow perhaps it is their side that gets to reap the consequences of the decision to abandon the rule of law and find things mysteriously going boom boom. It really "IS" a two way street, and just because we've been ladies and gentlemen and insisted they go down it first does not mean we don't have what it takes to join the fight on their terms.

..cept not me, of course, I'm baking cookies and making lemon-aid to pass out to commie and normie alike.. :flngl:
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Our side cannot mimic such principle because it requires the abandonment of all the other foundational principles that make liberty even possible.

Live free or die. THAT is the only fundamental principle here.
 

Sub-Zero

Veteran Member
Your summation reminded me that Sidney is supposedly licensed as a military lawyer and thus able to prosecute at military tribunals. :hmm:
[/QUOTE

Not only that, but wrap your head around this, and it's possible uses; there's hasn't been a legitimate election since 2017 as there is a federal law requiring voting machines be certified. This act created the Election Assistance Commission.

Find out who was re-elected in 2018. They weren't.

Read what is required by law. It wasn't done, intentionally.

Links: eac.gov | U.S. Election Assistance Commission https://www.eac.gov

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title52/subtitle2/chapter209&edition=prelim

Search for key words.

This is law, not a suggestion.

Wrap your head around the implications of politicians elected in 2018 that were not valid elections.

Think about a computer, about what makes it work. Both the hardware software need to be certified.
 

Sub-Zero

Veteran Member
So now do you understand why President Trump made today a holiday?

How does it tie into the two bills?

When does government shutdown begin?

Will there be free flights for staffers next week with the government shutdown?

Without staffers will the bills be re-written in time (3 days next week)?

Will people have their China Flu checks next week?

Were Christmas presents pretty slim, or non-existant this year?

Will eviction filings start in two weeks?

Will people know what's in the bill and how much pork is in it, and not for them?

Who will the people blame?

How many more are now Trump supporters?

Trump has this.
 
Top