CHAT Thoughts on Pfizer’s “approved” jab

As I recall, Pfizer has full approval for a jab that:
Isn’t sold under their name.
Isn’t made by them.
Although approved for use here, it is not available here.
Only available in Israel (?) The world’s largest test lab.
It continues to be available here under EUA only.
Under EUA, there is a legal difference from Commiejab.
Under EUA, there is even less liability and disclosure of risks.
Under EUA, it cannot be mandated in any form.
If there were truly an approved jab available here, wouldn’t that knock out the other EUA jabs? Wouldn’t Pfizer use that to knock the others out of the market? Wouldn’t that alone show there is no available, approved jab that can be mandated?
Am I missing anything?
 

BUBBAHOTEPT

Veteran Member
As I recall, Pfizer has full approval for a jab that:
Isn’t sold under their name.
Isn’t made by them.
Although approved for use here, it is not available here.
Only available in Israel (?) The world’s largest test lab.
It continues to be available here under EUA only.
Under EUA, there is a legal difference from Commiejab.
Under EUA, there is even less liability and disclosure of risks.
Under EUA, it cannot be mandated in any form.
If there were truly an approved jab available here, wouldn’t that knock out the other EUA jabs? Wouldn’t Pfizer use that to knock the others out of the market? Wouldn’t that alone show there is no available, approved jab that can be mandated?
Am I missing anything?
Why no, you're not…… :applaud: :applaud: :applaud:
SHHHHHHH, just don't tell any body….:kaid:
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
"Am I missing anything? "

Only the distinction that everyone up to this point has done it voluntarily. The minor distinction of choosing to keep a job rather than NOT take the jab is still a distinction from being forced to take it...

I've mentioned the ask, tell, make continuum several times. We're between tell& make.
Now that OSHA has started moving, we'll see what a more codified tell looks like.

This plan is genius. Evil genius.
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
Snip from page 6. Pay attention to the dates.

4. Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of
the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate
the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of
COMIRNATY.
We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021
Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022
Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023
Study Completion: June 30, 2025
Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025
5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval Active Surveillance Study
Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus
 

dstraito

TB Fanatic
As I recall, Pfizer has full approval for a jab that:
Isn’t sold under their name.
Isn’t made by them.
Although approved for use here, it is not available here.
Only available in Israel (?) The world’s largest test lab.
It continues to be available here under EUA only.
Under EUA, there is a legal difference from Commiejab.
Under EUA, there is even less liability and disclosure of risks.
Under EUA, it cannot be mandated in any form.
If there were truly an approved jab available here, wouldn’t that knock out the other EUA jabs? Wouldn’t Pfizer use that to knock the others out of the market? Wouldn’t that alone show there is no available, approved jab that can be mandated?
Am I missing anything?
Yes

They want us dead

and

Lets go Brandon
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
I wonder if I should open a dedicated room for “personal Covid jab” rants. Must be 50-100 of you who’ve posted on this very topic (some multiple times). Another one of these posts is added every few days.

;)
 

ainitfunny

Saved, to glorify God.
As I recall, Pfizer has full approval for a jab that:
Isn’t sold under their name.
Isn’t made by them.
Although approved for use here, it is not available here.
Only available in Israel (?) The world’s largest test lab.
It continues to be available here under EUA only.
Under EUA, there is a legal difference from Commiejab.
Under EUA, there is even less liability and disclosure of risks.
Under EUA, it cannot be mandated in any form.
If there were truly an approved jab available here, wouldn’t that knock out the other EUA jabs? Wouldn’t Pfizer use that to knock the others out of the market? Wouldn’t that alone show there is no available, approved jab that can be mandated?
Am I missing anything?
Only that they had to change the DEFINITION OF VACCINE to continue calling it a vaccine
because

*it did Not prevent a vaccinated person from getting Covid,
*Does Not prevent a "vaccinated" person
from becoming contagious
* and a vaccinated person can spread
the disease,and FINALLY
*does Not prevent a vaccinated person from DYING OF COVID!
 
Last edited:

ainitfunny

Saved, to glorify God.
Only that they had to change the DEFINITION OF VACCINE to continue calling it a vaccine
because

*it did Not prevent a vaccinated person from getting Covid,
*Does Not prevent a "vaccinated" person
from becoming contagious
* and a vaccinated person can spread
the disease,and FINALLY
*does Not prevent a vaccinated person from DYING OF COVID!
"Am I missing anything? "

Only the distinction that everyone up to this point has done it voluntarily. The minor distinction of choosing to keep a job rather than NOT take the jab is still a distinction from being forced to take it...

I've mentioned the ask, tell, make continuum several times. We're between tell& make.
Now that OSHA has started moving, we'll see what a more codified tell looks like.

This plan is genius. Evil genius.

THAT is called under DURESS.
it is NOT LEGAL
 
Top