CORONA They Really ARE Trying to Kill Us

Paladin1

Paladin1

"In Omnia Paratus" is more than just a phrase
Samuel Adams said:
A firm and emphasized NO.

I am convinced, however, that Father expects big things from His people, now as at other times in history.
Click to expand...
Exactly. This is child's play compared to what's coming for real.

When you're seeing a death toll that runs into the Billions, then you're safe in saying that it's the End of Days.
 
C

Coulter

Veteran Member
Bones said:
Given my size, 6'4- 290, my Dr put me on a 325 mg aspirin per day after my light MI a year ago.

I've had to catch one a couple of times, and the relief is instant.

So far, so good.
Click to expand...

What do you mean here exactly?
Thanks
 
Toosh

Toosh

Veteran Member
I feel sorry for the employees of these big pharma companies. Imagine going to work each day, thinking that you are doing good work to make people's lives better and to cure disease - only to find out you have been doing exactly the opposite. It would make you vomit.
 
R

rondaben

Veteran Member
JMG91 said:
“As we learned about the connection between blood clots and COVID-19, we knew that aspirin – used to prevent stroke and heart attack – could be important for COVID-19 patients,”

The thing that stood out to me about all of this is the fact that the blood clots are appearing in VACCINATED people, yet this article makes it sound as though it's a side effect of COVID. Um, no.
Click to expand...
Umm yes. Elevated d dimers and clotting is commonly seen in covid infections.
 
pauldingbabe

pauldingbabe

The Great Cat
Bones said:
Meaning....I felt symptoms of an impending MI. I immediately swallowed aspirin and successfully avoided any big trouble
Click to expand...

Might want to look into cayenne tincture for emergency use as well. There might be contraindications as far as blood thinners go. In an emergency though, I would want everything available. Especially with MI history and catching some lasting trauma from the MIs.

I'm not a Dr so please do your due diligence and research. Just want to help. ;)
 
R

rondaben

Veteran Member
Babs said:
How can you tell? How do you know?
Click to expand...
Post infection incidence if clotting remains higher than baseline though lower than during the acute phase. The difference if believed to be due to immune mediated thrombosis--the worse the infection the stronger the link to post event clotting. Most of the current studies are retrospective, following groups of patients that had covid as part of studies in long covid.
 
R

rondaben

Veteran Member
bracketquant said:
Correct, if the data out of the US and Europe are true that 40,000+ people have died from the jabs. The dead, with fully congealed blood, can no longer get clots, right?
Click to expand...
It just requires understanding a smidgen about vaccines and how covid works. But that's ok, if you believe the 40,000 number the argument is pointless.
 
B

bracketquant

Veteran Member
rondaben said:
It just requires understanding a smidgen about vaccines and how covid works. But that's ok, if you believe the 40,000 number the argument is pointless.
Click to expand...
I's not about believing that number. If there was just 1 jab death, the chance of natural clots would be reduced, though quite minimally. Do you believe that there was at least 1 death?

My comprehension, not "understanding", of vaccines is constantly changing, as the very definition of them does.
 
R

rondaben

Veteran Member
bracketquant said:
I's not about believing that number. If there was just 1 jab death, the chance of natural clots would be reduced, though quite minimally. Do you believe that there was at least 1 death?

My comprehension, not "understanding", of vaccines is constantly changing, as the very definition of them does.
Click to expand...
And so to carry on the absurdity if there is "40,000"+1 live births since the start of the pandemic the overall odds of more "natural clots" would rise as there would be additional non vaccinated, non immune hosts.

Makes sense.
 
B

bracketquant

Veteran Member
rondaben said:
And so to carry on the absurdity if there is "40,000"+1 live births since the start of the pandemic the overall odds of more "natural clots" would rise as there would be additional non vaccinated, non immune hosts.

Makes sense.
Click to expand...
Where do you get the 40,001+ number? Do you have any supportive data that 2 year olds, and under, are getting jabbed?
 
R

rondaben

Veteran Member
bracketquant said:
Where do you get the 40,001+ number? Do you have any supportive data that 2 year olds, and under, are getting jabbed?
Click to expand...
Read it again, "additional non vaccinated, non immune hosts." presumably using your logic they would still be prone to "natural" clotting and as im quite sure there have been more that 40,000 births in the last 2 years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top