The Complete History of Depopulation Vaccines
They are much more common than you would think
amidwesterndoctor.substack.com
Or see Depopulation Vectors - Vox Popoli if you prefer.
The Complete History of Depopulation Vaccines
They are much more common than you would think
A Midwestern Doctor
Apr 5
In part 1 of this article, I attempted to make the case that there has been a longstanding interest within the ruling class of our society to reduce the population by targeting individuals deemed undesirable. In the past, these programs typically targeted the poor, people of color, colonial subjects and those with genetic defects that were considered dangerous to the country’s gene pool. For those of you interested in learning more about this topic and how common it is even in the present day, I would highly recommend reading the first part of this article and Chapter 10 of the book The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
In recent times, the targeted demographic appears to have been expanded to include most of the Western population. Because of this, groups (that you, dear reader, likely belong to) that were not typically targeted for population reduction in the past now are. We are all the prey now.
As there is no good way to go about population control, a lot of very messy approaches have been tried. In the last article I attempted to highlight some of the horrific examples from the past, in order to show there is a clear case precedent for this being implemented on a large scale.
Given that vaccines are unconditionally trusted by most people and are very easy to administer, if a vaccination could produce sterilization or at least reduce fertility from a single injection, it would provide a technological solution to a dilemma the ruling class has faced for over a century. The only possible superior alternative I can think of would be a highly contagious respiratory virus (or “self-spreading vaccine”) that impaired future fertility without otherwise causing too much damage (and to some extent has been observed in men after COVID-19).
As a result, methods of making fertility-impairing vaccines have been repeatedly researched. Each of the candidate vaccines I was able to identify worked in a similar manner: they carried an antigen that was similar to a protein necessary for fertilization or pregnancy, and thus created an autoimmune response that impaired fertility.
There are basically two ways this can be done. The first is to produce the needed antigen and mix it with an immunostimulatory adjuvant. The second is to genetically engineer an infectious organism that has the antigen within it, and as with rheumatic fever, the damage to fertility will occur because the immune system is programmed to fight this pathogen.
In the previous article on the military’s anthrax vaccination program, I discussed a class of bioweapons originally developed by Russia that spliced necessary human tissue onto infectious organisms to create a time-delayed autoimmune bioweapon. One of the curious aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is that it has a high number of similarities with normal human tissue, which I suspect may have been deliberately engineered in the virus to cause severe autoimmunity.
A friend who worked in this field was at the site of the original SARS outbreak in Canada and told me they were relatively certain the original SARS outbreak was an accidental lab leak. As that virus is very easy to modify and is an excellent delivery platform, they said it has been a favorite subject for everyone in the field to mess around with engineering. From the start of this pandemic, they were also positive SARS-CoV-2 was artificial (which was painfully obvious from the gene sequence), but like many others they did not publish their views for fear of retaliation.
Due to the long history of population control measures and the ruling class’s increasing need to develop an effective tool for it, I suspected the COVID vaccines would eventually be found to reduce fertility. After all, this was a once in a lifetime opportunity I could not see the eugenicists would let themselves miss.
Early on Dr. Mike Yeadon recognized an overlap in the spike protein with a protein necessary for maintaining a pregnancy (Syncytin-1) created a clear risk for fertility. At great personal risk, he filed a formal petition to the regulators to protect women of childbearing age in the initial vaccine trials. His concerns were not addressed and subsequent regulatory document leaks from the European FDA revealed Pfizer exempted themselves from testing the fertility risk, something that is typically always required.
Once the vaccine emerged on the market, it was discovered that one of the most common effects was severe disturbances and alterations to women’s menstrual cycles. This side effect was initially denied by every medical authority (it does not occur with other vaccines), but eventually acknowledged and rationalized as being an insignificant manifestation of inflammation (so once again “that means the vaccine is working”).
I initially wondered if these changes were due to varying degrees of clotting in the body (in Chinese medicine, blood stasis is the main cause of menstrual abnormalities, and many vaccinated patients reported massive clots during their menstrual cycle none of us had seen prior to these vaccines). Later, when a Japanese FOIA request was approved, biodistribution studies of the lipid nanoparticle (containing the vaccine mRNA) became available for review and showed they concentrated in the ovaries. This is very unusual and raises the possibility that the lipid nanoparticle may have been designed for this purpose.
Since the ovaries regulate the menstrual cycle, this suggested that menstrual changes were a result of the vaccine creating some type of disturbance in the ovaries, which was a much more plausible explanation than simply saying “oh, it must be coming from general inflammation.” This also made me worry that some type of permanent change was being created in the eggs with an ensuing effect that would take decades to show up (many potential health issues come to mind). The only related precedent I can even think of for this was DES, a now banned estrogen analog that was widely prescribed to pregnant mothers (ironically to prevent complications in pregnancy). DES had many side effects including alteration of genitalia and an increased risk for cancer decades later in the fetus’s life.
While I have some experience working in drug development and with regulators, Dr. Yeadon has significantly more experience than me, and with his permission I will quote him:
I was just reflecting on my first encounters with the fundamental design points of the leading c19 “vaccines”. I focused on mRNA because I believed that to be the most dangerous option. The industry had spent years trying to make this a viable mode of treatment and had not overcome several serious barriers. One was that mRNA wasn’t stable & would get broken down quickly. Another was that it was nearly impossible to get cells to take up the mRNA without violent processes involving electrical fields or toxic chemicals. Why would that be? Consider that the integrity of your genetic complement is the most important thing to pass to your progeny. No wonder your cells have multiple defense mechanisms to prevent alien genetic codes invading them.
So the mRNA “vaccine” companies chemically altered the ribose nucleic acid bases so these aren’t even natural bases. They also wrapped up the mRNA in special lipids to help fool your immune system & allow an alien install.
All that looks risky & nowhere near long enough was given to look for unwanted effects. Even though they planned to inject BILLIONS who didn’t even need it, and even that only if they worked (which they don’t....so they’ve lied about efficacy, as real-world numbers are nothing like the trial claims).
But recently, I’ve realized they’ve all made appalling errors and they all made the same errors. That’s not possible to happen if they were competing honestly.
1. They picked the most dangerous part of the virus to express, the spike protein. We now know that most of the serious complications arise from the toxicity of spike. Why did all four choose this piece? This is 13% of the gene sequences, so there were plenty of other options.
2. They’ve picked the genetically most unstable part of the virus. That’s just stupid, and had they not done so, they couldn’t have played the “new variant claim”. Was that why they picked it?
3. They’ve picked the least dissimilar part from numerous other human proteins. That maximizes the risk of auto immune reactions.
The more you look at it, the more it looks like collusion to injure people.
By the way, there have now been really comprehensive studies of how human immune systems deal with infections like this. Only 10% of immune responses in your extensive “immune repertoire” is directed to spike protein. All the rest go to other parts of the pathogen. Coincidence? I don’t think so.
My initial hypothesis during the COVID rollout was that the mRNA vaccines would be pushed through and everything else would be thrown under the bus (which is largely what happened) due to the trillions of dollars to be made from opening up the mRNA market. Since the mRNA products were too unsafe to give to humans outside of the unprecedented “emergency” situation created through unnecessary lockdowns, commercial interests dictated that this window would be used to the maximum extent possible.
I also had two alternative hypothesizes. The first was that mRNA vaccines were going to be used as some type of Malthusian tool to reduce the population. The second was that the Chinese military had designed the Sars-CoV-2 so that the most likely vaccine candidate, a vector that mass produced spike proteins, would be the actual weapon and would end up being deployed in enemy territory and allow the country to self-destruct from within. It should be noted that while China also developed these vaccines, they were never deployed and traditional vaccination platforms were used for its citizenry instead.
At this time, I feel each hypothesis is still quite likely to be true, and the purpose of this article series is to introduce the evidence for the Malthusian interpretation Dr. Yeadon hints at in his commentary. Lastly, while I believe it is likely the virus was deliberately engineered to create significant autoimmunity (a key characteristic of both COVID-19 infections and vaccine injuries), it is much harder to know if it was specifically engineered to reduce the fertility of those infected or was an early prototype for a virus that will be able to do this.
/snip/ - read the rest at the link if interested
Last edited:
