EBOLA NY Times article on the UN and WHOs reponse to Ebola - it's $$$ right down the line!

R.Tist

Membership Revoked

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Artie, where's Mica and Pete?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/04/world/africa/cuts-at-who-hurt-response-to-ebola-crisis.html?_r=1

There are literally tons of both medical and food supplies just sitting on the dock in Sierra Leone. They're rotting.

The reason this outbreak was not contained was the WHO's passive approach to the situation, and their (declared) lack of funds. Neither the UN nor the WHO responded when they could have and should have.

It's all about money and greed - as usual.

Artie.
 

Scrapman

Veteran Member
3.98 billion a year is there budget. were the hell does that money go to????Has the UN ever been audited??
 

greysage

On The Level
The reason this outbreak was not contained was the WHO's passive approach to the situation

And for the same reason it hasn't and likely won't be contained in America.
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie / FJB!
Leadership. We lack leadership. We've got Bozo as the President and a bunch of DC insiders who have poop for brains.

We need someone strong enough to say, "NO!" to our open borders and to put the US first.
 
Top