Bridey Rose
Veteran Member
When posting a link to my published summary of a medical journal article on the new inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against COVID-19, I introduced the post as "good news for those looking for an alternative to mRNA gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine." When I later checked the post to see how many views it got, I learned my post had been deleted by LinkedIn for violation of policy!
I was shocked that they'd censor a truthful assessment of a medical product so quickly. Silly me! Must not blaspheme the vax divinity, that clay-footed, brazen idol of Big Pharma.
At the same time I made that post, I introduced a link to another news brief I wrote by referring to the mRNA jabs as "vaccinations" in scare quotes. That post got through without censorship and remains on LinkedIn AFAIK. So if you're going to ding the mRNA jabs on LinkedIn, you'd better be sneaky about it!
I was shocked that they'd censor a truthful assessment of a medical product so quickly. Silly me! Must not blaspheme the vax divinity, that clay-footed, brazen idol of Big Pharma.
At the same time I made that post, I introduced a link to another news brief I wrote by referring to the mRNA jabs as "vaccinations" in scare quotes. That post got through without censorship and remains on LinkedIn AFAIK. So if you're going to ding the mRNA jabs on LinkedIn, you'd better be sneaky about it!