Immigration changing our future

Martin

Deceased
Immigration changing our future
By Robert Hays

What is the ultimate effect of uncontrolled immigration?

Maybe these statistics will give you some idea where we may be headed. The federal government's estimate of 9 million to 12 million illegal aliens may be far below the actual numbers. That shouldn't be a surprise, for the government often minimizes its negligence on many issues, by trying to minimize the size of the problem.



Red flags began to appear in 2005, when a study by the Bear Stearns investment firm concluded the Census Bureau's numbers were extremely low. The study, entitled "The Underground Labor Force Is Rising to the Surface," set the number of illegal aliens at twice the Census Bureau's estimates, making the actual numbers around 20 million.

Since that study, those numbers have increased. Time Magazine reported that 3 million entered the country in 2005, which contradicted government claims that roughly a million cross our borders every year. At this point we could easily be near 30 million and counting.

The significance is obvious. With a drastic increase in the actual number of illegal immigrants, the Census Bureau's predictions for 2050 are worthless. If you double the numbers here now, the projected result will also dramatically increase.

Instead of the Hispanic population eventually being greater than 100 million, it's going to be closer to 200 million. It's conceivable that Hispanics will be 40 percent of our population, instead of the Census Bureau's 24 percent estimate.

With a birth rate 47 percent higher than the overall U.S. average, they would eventually become the largest ethnic group. The growth impact is further magnified by the fact that white and black populations have grown by only 2 percent and 7 percent respectively since 2000.

Statistics indicate that the non-Hispanic white population will contribute nothing to overall growth after 2030 because it will be declining. The black population will double its present size to 62 million by 2050.

Considering that most Hispanic immigrants are of Mexican origin, the higher numbers would easily translate into more immigrants of Mexican origin living in this country than the population of Mexico, which is expected to be 146 million by 2050.

In the coming decades, America's social and ethnic fabric is going to be dramatically transformed unless an unforeseen event alters our present course. For some, this uncontrolled immigration is perceived as a path to destruction, for others a solution to labor shortages.

What cannot be denied is that within 50 years America will be vastly different. With conceivably more Mexican immigrants within our borders than the future population of Mexico itself, I think we have every reason to be concerned.

Will these immigrants assimilate, or will they demand we accept the injection of their culture and language into ours? These are not idle concerns.

We also have reasons to wonder why our leaders in Washington are permitting this uncontrolled migration? Will our children and grandchildren in 2050 enjoy the prosperity and security we have known, or will our mismanagement of this entire issue create a country full of ethic unrest and chaos?

http://hattiesburgamerican.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080329/OPINION01/803290324/1014/OPINION
 

Wowser

Membership Revoked
Immigration is not a Force of Nature. We are being genocided by design.


VDARE.COM - http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/080123_nd.htm

January 23, 2008
National Data, By Edwin S. Rubenstein

Hispanics, Blacks Driving Baby Boomlet


"For the first time in 35 years, the U.S. fertility rate has climbed high enough to sustain a stable population, solidifying the nation's unique status among industrialized countries." U.S. Fertility Rate Hits 35-Year High, Stabilizing Population, By Rob Stein, Washington Post, December 21, 2007

Thus begins a Washington Post article celebrating news that our women are finally having enough babies to forestall a population decline.

The year 2006 saw more babies born here than in any year since 1961 and the largest increase in births since 1989. [Centers for Disease Control, National Vital Statistics Reports, "Births: Preliminary Data for 2006," December 5, 2007. PDF ]

More importantly, the birth spike pushed the total fertility rate—the expected number of babies born to women over their lifetime - to 2.1, according to the Census Bureau. That figure is considered the "replacement rate"—the rate at which a generation can exactly replace itself.

Why the baby pop? The so-called experts are not without ideas.

America is an increasingly religious country, and fundamentalist religious values encourage childbearing. (One piece of evidence: Parents who chose biblical names for their children have much larger families than those that chose secular names, after adjusting for income and other factors.)

U.S. working mothers face less stigma and more support, compared to their counterparts in other advanced countries. The proliferation of part-time jobs, cyber commuting, flextime—not to mention fast food, microwaves, and 24 hour supermarkets—helps too.

Other possibilities: A decline in safe sex and stricter rules governing abortions in some states. [Against the Trend, U.S. Births Way Up, By Mike Stobbe, AP, January 16, 2008]

And (ahem) immigration? The Post is skeptical:

"Some of the increase is explained by immigration. Hispanics have the highest fertility rate…….But Hispanics do not represent enough of the population to fully explain the trend, and the fertility rate of U.S. whites is still higher than that of other developed countries."

Oh, really?

At 15 percent of the U.S. population, Hispanics may seem to "not represent enough of the population" to explain national fertility trends. But this ignores their wildly disproportionate role in the baby boomlet.

In 2006 127,647 more babies were born in the U.S. than in 2005. Here is the birth spike distributed by the mother’s race and ethnicity: (Table 1.)
Total births: +127,647 (100 percent of the increase)
Hispanic births +53,546 (42 percent of the increase)
non Hispanic black births +33,461 (26 percent of the increase)
non Hispanic white births +30,065 (24 percent of the increase)
Asian and other births +10,575 (8 percent of the increase)

The Hispanic share of the birth spike (42 percent) is nearly three-times their population share (15 percent). “Anchor babies” are certainly a factor, but the birth data doesn’t report the mother’s citizenship status—yet another example of the systematic of government to ask possibly embarrassing questions about our post-1965 immigration disaster.

Meanwhile, non-Hispanic whites (two-thirds of the population) accounted for just 24 percent of 2006’s birth pop.

As for white women, their fertility rate rose in 2006 and is higher than their European counterparts. But they are still having babies at well below the replacement rate—and increasingly below the rates of U.S. blacks and Hispanics:

The graphic shows rather dramatic fluctuations in minority fertility—down in the 1990s, rising (especially for Hispanics) since 2000. Black fertility crossed above the 2.1 rate mark in 2006—the first time since 2001.

By comparison, white fertility has barely budged.

Whites are the only group with chronically below replacement fertility over the past two decades.


A few months ago we predicted minorities would account for half of all U.S. births by 2011 and more than 60 percent by 2021.

Those dates are already in play.

Edwin S. Rubenstein (email him) is President of ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.
 

David Nettleton

Veteran Member
Thanks Martin for posting this article and keeping the truth and reality in front of us. I fear many have lost hope, have NO faith in their government, and/or in denial that we have an army of strangers camped in our neighborhoods destroying our communities.
 

pricilla_777

Contributing Member
What I've noticed most with this immigration thing is that they have replaced the word Caucasian with Non-Hispanic White. That really goads me whenever I read it. Grrrrrr :smkd:
 

nharrold

Deceased
"For some, this uncontrolled immigration is perceived as a path to destruction, for others a solution to labor shortages."

I'll take the "path to destruction" option, please...
 

David Nettleton

Veteran Member
"For some, this uncontrolled immigration is perceived as a path to destruction, for others a solution to labor shortages."

I'll take the "path to destruction" option, please...

Agreed nharrold. But there is NO labor shortage here. We can and will do the work but we have to be paid fairly for it. We like to live one family per house etc. etc. Ours' is a shadow government for corporate America that wants cheap labor, to stick the average citizen with the social costs of illegals, and all for more money. The unions are in on it too. Traitors!
 

Wowser

Membership Revoked
We are being Camped of the Saints. I will not stand in front of my family and shout, "Ceasar, we who are about to die salute you!".

I shout Sic Semper Tyrannis,
Molon Labe!



http://www.mnforsustain.org/camp_of_the_saints_bookreview_taylor_sj.htm

Camp of the Saints

Jean Raspail

1. Book review by Samuel Jared Taylor
2. Social Contract article by Jean Raspail

Book Review

Samuel Jared Taylor*

A haunting novel about the end of the White race.

Fiction can be more powerful than fact. Authors have always lent their talents to causes, often swaying events more effectively than journalists or politicians. Fiction, including virtually everything emitted by Hollywood, has usually been in the service of the left, but occasionally an author declares his allegiance to culture and tradition.

In "The Camp of the Saints", Jean Raspail goes further and declares his allegiance to his race —though it is an allegiance tinged with bitterness at the weakness of the White man. It is the story of the final, tragic end of European civilization which falls, like all great civilizations, by its own hand.

The novel is set in the near future in France, where the leftist sicknesses of multi-culturalism and multi-racialism have undermined all natural defenses. As Mr. Raspail writes of young Europeans:

"That scorn of a people of other races, the knowledge that one's own is best, the triumphant joy at feeling oneself to be part of humanity's finest -none of that had ever filled these youngsters' addled brains, or at least so little that the monstrous cancer implanted in the Western conscience had quashed it in no time at all."

By then, "the White race was nothing more than a million sheep," beaten down by decades of anti-White propaganda. As Mr. Raspail explains, it was "a known fact that racism comes in two forms: that practiced by Whites -heinous and inexcusable, whatever its motives -and that practiced by blacks -quite justified, whatever its excess, since it's merely the expression of a righteous revenge . . . ."

This is the state of mind with which the West confronts its final crisis: nearly a million starving, disease-ridden boat people -men, women, and children -set sail from the Ganges delta for Europe. Practically no one is willing to say that this flotilla must be stopped at all costs. Instead, liberals and Christians spout confident nonsense about welcoming their Hindu brothers into the wealth and comfort of Europe.

Failure of Churches to assist White flock

The thought of this wretched brown mass sailing for Europe is a source of great joy for the World Council of Churches. Its men are "shock-troop pastors, righteous in their loathing of anything and everything that smacked of present-day Western society, and Woodford Green, Essexss in their love of whatever might destroy it." They are determined "to welcome the million Christs on board those ships, who would rise up, reborn, and signal the dawn of a just, new day . . . ."

One of the few Europeans who recognizes that what has come to be called the "Last Chance Armada" spells the doom of Christendom reproaches a group of anti-Western churchmen: "There's not one of you proud of his skin, and all that it stands for. . . ." "Not proud, or aware of it either," replies one. "That's the price we have to pay for the brotherhood of man. We're happy to pay it."

Europe is rife with fifth-column propagandists, products of earlier capitulations. Typical of these is Clement Dio, "citizen of France, North African by blood . . . . [who] possessed a belligerent intellect that thrived on springs of racial hatred barely below the surface, and far more intense than anyone imagined."

Europe's Fifth Column

Knowing full well that acceptance of the first wave of third world refugees will only prompt imitators that will eventually swamp the White West, he writes happily about how "the civilization of the Ganges" will enrich a culturally bankrupt continent:

"Considering all the wonders that the Ganges had bestowed on us already —sacred music, theatre, dance, yoga, mysticism, arts and crafts, jewellery, new styles in dress -the burning question . . . was how we could manage to do without these folks any longer!"

As the flotilla makes for Europe, school teachers set assignments for their students: "Describe the life of the poor, suffering souls on board the ships, and express your feelings toward their plight in detail, by imagining, for example, that one of the desperate families comes to your home and asks you to take them in."

The boat people steam towards the Suez Canal, but the Egyptians, not soft like Whites, threaten to sink the entire convoy. One hundred ships turn south, around the horn of Africa -towards Europe. The refugees run out of fuel for cooking and start burning their own excrement. Pilots sent to observe the fleet report an unbearable stench.

A few deluded Whites have boarded the ships in Calcutta and sail along with "the civilization of the Ganges," dreaming of Europe:

"Already they saw it their mission to guide the flock's first steps on Western soil. One would empty out all our hospital beds so that cholera-ridden and leprous wretches could sprawl between their clean White sheets. Another would cram our brightest, cheeriest nurseries full of monster children. Another would preach unlimited sex, in the name of the one, single race of the future . . . ."

The Hindus tolerate these traitors until almost the end of the voyage and then strangle them, throwing their naked bodies overboard so that they drift onto a Spanish beach as the armada heads for the south of France. The boat people have no need for guides of this kind, from a race that has lost all relevance:

"The Last Chance Armada, en route to the West, was feeding on hatred. A hatred of almost philosophical proportions, so utter, so absolute, that it had no thoughts of revenge, or blood, or death, but merely consigned its objects to the ultimate void. In this case, the Whites. For the Ganges refugees, on their way to Europe, the Whites had simply ceased to be."

Finally, on the morning of Easter Sunday, the 100 creaking hulks crash onto the beaches. The local inhabitants have abandoned all thought of taking in a family of Hindus, and have fled north. Many of the fashionable leftist agitators have likewise left their editorial jobs and radio programs and disappeared, with their gold bars, to Switzerland. The army has been sent south to prevent a landing, but there are doubts as to whether Whites can be made to slaughter unarmed civilians.

As one government official explains to another, "[D]on't count on the army, monsieur. Not if you've got . . . genocide in mind."

The other replies: "Then it just means another kind of genocide . . . . Our own."

At the last moment the French President is unable to give the order to fire. He urges the troops to act according to their consciences. They throw down their rifles and run.

Bands of hippies and Christians, who have come south to welcome their brown brothers also turn and run as soon as they get a whiff of the new arrivals. "How could a good cause smell so bad?"

Feeble resistance


The few remaining Whites with any sense of their civilization find they can communicate practically without speaking: "That was part of the Western genius, too: a mannered mentality, a collusion of aesthetes, a conspiracy of caste, a good-natured indifference to the crass and the common. With so few left now to share in its virtues, the current passed all the more easily between them."

A handful of citizens drive south with their hunting rifles on suicide missions to do the job their government is unable to do. One of these, ironically, is an assimilated Indian. As he explains to another band of citizen-hunters, "Every White supremacist cause —no matter where or when— has had blacks on its side. And they didn't mind fighting for the enemy, either. Today, with so many Whites turning black, why can't a few `darkies' decide to be White? Like me."

The Indian is killed, along with his White comrades, in an attack by fighter-bombers sent by the French government to put down resistance to the invasion. Soldiers who were unable to kill brown people make short work of "racist" Whites.

All over France non-Whites take the offensive. Algerians on assembly lines rise up and kill their White bosses. African street cleaners knock on the doors of deluxe Paris apartments and move in. A multi-racial government, including a few token Whites, announces a new dispensation.



Heading our way: Refugees from the 3rd World.


Capitulation by the French means capitulation everywhere. Masses of ragged Chinese pour into Russia, whose troops are likewise unable to fire on hungry civilians. Huge fleets of beggars set sail from every pestilential southern port, heading for Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. The same drama unfolds In the United States. "Black would be black, and White would be White. There was no changing either, except by a total mix, a blend into tan. They were enemies on sight, and their hatred and scorn only grew as they came to know each other better." Americans lay down their arms just as the French do.

Raspail hints here and there at what the new Europe will be like: "At the time, each refugee quarter had its stock of White women, all free for the taking. And perfectly legal. (One of the new regime's first laws, in fact. In order to 'demythify' the White woman, as they put it.)"

The first provisional government also has a Minister of Population -a French woman married to a black -to ensure a permanent solution to the race problem. After all: "Only a White woman can have a White baby. Let her choose not to conceive one, let her choose only nonWhite mates, and the genetic results aren't long in coming."

It is all over for the White Man


And so ends the saga of Western man, not in pitched battle, not in defeat at the hands of superior forces, but by capitulation.

Even after a quarter century, the novel is astonishingly current. It was written before Communism collapsed, and the new French revolution is spiced with anti-capitalist slogans that now sound slightly off key. One might also complain that a few of the characters verge on caricature. Nevertheless, the central tragedy -suicidal White weakness- is brilliantly portrayed and could have been written in 1995.

Mr. Raspail obviously loves his culture and his race, and wrote in the afterward that although he had intended to end the book with a spasm of White self-consciousness that saves Europe, the final catastrophe seemed to write itself. Perhaps he could not, in good faith, write a different ending. In the preface to the 1985 French edition he observed:

"[T]he West is empty, even if it has not yet become really aware of it. An extraordinarily inventive civilization, surely the only one capable of meeting the challenges of the third millennium, the West has no soul left. At every level —nations, race, cultures as well as individuals— it is always the soul that wins the decisive battles."

The Camp of the Saints puts the White man's dilemma in the most difficult terms: slaughter hundreds of thousands of women and children or face oblivion. Of course, a nation that had the confidence to shed blood in the name of its own survival would never be put to such a test; no mob of beggars would threaten it.

The story that Mr. Raspail tells -the complete collapse of Western man even when the very survival of his civilization so clearly hangs in the balance -may seem implausible to some. And yet, what Whites do in The Camp of the Saints is no different from what they have done every day for the past forty years. The only difference is that the novel moves in fast forward; it covers in months what could take decades.

Whites all around the world suffer from Mr. Raspail's "monstrous cancer implanted in the Western conscience." South Africans vote for black rule. Americans import millions of nonWhites and grant them racial preferences. Australians abandon their Whites-only immigration policy and become multi-cultural.

White extinction inevitable - or is it?

Even if he did not actively cooperate in his own destruction, time works against the White man. As Mr. Raspail writes in the afterward, "the proliferation of other races dooms our race, my race, irretrievably to extinction in the century to come, if we hold fast to our present moral principles No other race subscribes to these moral principles —if that is really what they are— because they are weapons of self-annihilation."

Mr. Raspail's powerful, gripping novel is a call to all Whites to rekindle their sense of race, love of culture, and pride in history —for he knows that without them we will disappear.

[ MFS note: This book review is made available for information only. ]
_______
* Courtesy of the British National Party.
See original at < http://www.bnp.org.uk/reviews/camp_saints_raspail.htm >.
Originally published by the American Renaissance < http://www.amren.com/ >.
 

topcat46

Inactive
What I've noticed most with this immigration thing is that they have replaced the word Caucasian with Non-Hispanic White. That really goads me whenever I read it. Grrrrrr :smkd:

This irritates me too. All white Americans are defined on the basis of being Hispanic. Being Hispanic is the new standard of measurement. Just one of the many subtle ways we are being conditioned to accept transformation into a Hispanic nation.
 
Top