ideal survival 4x4

vlad

Inactive
The ideal survival vehicle is 4x4, 3/4 ton, easy to work on, old enough to be cheap, new enough to get parts for and, tough enough to last.

My new in 1976 GMC 4x4 3/4 ton pickup has 300,000+ plus miles. Maintenance = reliability. It has V8 350, 4 speed standard shift, 4.10 axles, dual-range transfer case, manual hubs. In Low range first gear I have crept up and down icy mountain roads with perfect confidence --- and V-bar chains on all four wheels.

Between the steel line from the gas tank, and the mechanical fuel pump, I installed a piece of new neoprene gas hose with two each in-line fuel filters in tandem. This serves to capture grit that would abrade, and shorten the service life of, the fuel pump diaphragm; and otherwise clog the moving parts inside the fuel pump. Between the output side of the mechanical fuel pump and the intake of the carburetor I installed a long piece of neoprene gas line, with one inline fuel filter, secured where it will not touch the exhaust manifold.

At the front of the block, near the mechanical fuel pump, there is a hole threaded 3/8x16. Screw a 3/8x16 bolt in that hole to secure the fuel pump push rod. Remove the old fuel pump. Now is the best time to install neoprene lines and in-line fuel filters as described above. Install new fuel pump. Remove 3.8x16 bolt before you start the engine.

I swapped HEI (high energy ignition with electronic module) for a points-type distributor. HEI distributor is $200 and points-type distributor is $50. I replaced Quadra-Jet 4 bbl carb with Edelbrock 1405 4 bbl carb, and bought a calibration kit. I can change jets and rods for anything from max power in axle-deep mud to economy cruise at high altitude. Just now I have it calibrated for 6000 elev. In East Texas 400 elevation at 65 mph I average 12.5 mpg.

My carb flooded. The engine would not start. I disassembled the carb on my tailgate and found a defective float. I replaced both floats (from my tool box), reassembled the carb and drove home.

In my truck toolbox I carry at all times a starter, alternator, fuel pump, complete distributor; extra points, condensor and rotor; and hand tools ...as well as food, a rifle or two, two axes, and a daypack with a few goodies. If you aint got it with you it could be a long walk to get it.

I use the alternator but have a generator; and installed a wire-wound voltage regulator. The generator stays in my toolbox. It takes only minutes to bolt the generator in place.

Chevrolet part number 3814970, right exhaust manifold, has a place to mount the generator. It fits all Chevy/GMC small block V8 '73 thru '86. You can order a new one from your dealer.

A generator-equipped vehicle with standard transmission will roll-start without a starter or a battery. Secure the positive battery cable clamp where it cannot possibly ground. Rollstart and go!

An alternator must be electrically energized to produce electric current. If you have no battery your truck cannot run.

Avoid automatic transmissions. Since 1960 or so AT vehicles will not pushstart.

We can thank Big Brother for the many changes in automotive design. EMP..... electro-magnetc pulse from a nuclear detonation 400 miles above earth will destroy all unshielded electronic parts in line-of-sight. ...... the electronic components in Electronic-Fuel Injection, alternators, telephones, radios, TV, computers, watches, GPS........etc

In 1945 we nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. At that time all vehicles had carburetors, generators with wire-wound voltae regulators, and points-type ignition. Vehicle exposed to EMP were still operable.. In the early 1950s US conducted nuclear tests in Nevada, and studied effects of nuclear radiation (EMP) on vehicles etc. Shortly thereafter the generator was replaced with an alternator that has unshielded electronic "chips" ..

If your racy 2003 model Technodazzle stops, call AAA. Have it towed to the dealer. A highly educated Automotive Diagnostic Technician will attach it to a $100,000 computer to learn which parts to change. Repairs may cost as little as four months pay.

1973 through 1986 Chevy/GMC 4x4 pickup, Blazer and Suburban (seats nine if you wish) have 95% parts interchange. The same carb, fuel pump, alternator, starter fits them all. Every junkyard from Fairbanks to Florida has lots of old Chevy 4x4s.

...........................................


Change HEI to points on 1976 GMC/Chevy V8 350

A picture is worth a 1000 words. At the public library find a Chilton manual for 1974 Chevy/GMC V8 350 and study the engine ignition wiring; and xerox those pages to use as a guide.

If possible, find someone who drives a 74 or older GMC V8 350 and eyeball his wiring.

buy these parts
- rebuilt points distributor for 1974 GMC V8 350, with cap and rotor
- also buy replacement points, rotor and condensor (for later tuneup. each time you use tune up parts, immediately buy replacements for your toolbox for next time.)
- buy the allen wrench with long handle with which to adjust the points
- set of points-type spark plug wires
- 8 each AC 44 plugs ( gap them 0.035")
- two ballast resistors ( one goes in toolbox for later)
- one coil and coil bracket (you may want to buy an extra coil at this time)

STEP ONE is to read all instructions three times before you do anything else. If possible have an experienced friend oversee your installation.
--begin
-remove negative battery cable clamp from the alternator bracket.
-tape the neg battery cable to a heater hose (so it cannot ground).
-mount ballast resistor on the firewall.
-mount the coil and bracket on the fire wall below the ballast resistor.
-the (only ) RED wire that presently runs from ignition switch through firewall to your HEI distributor will be connected to the driver side of the ballast resistor. (cut the red wire at a point 3" from HEI distributor. cut a 15" inch piece of nr 12 insulated wire to extend the RED wire to connect to driver side of ballast resistor.
use a butt conector to connect 15" wire to red wire. use a spade connector to connect it to ballast resistor.)
-with an 8" piece of nr 12 insulated wire, spade connector on each end, connect passenger side of the ballast resistor to the "plus" ( + ) side of the coil.
-the only black wire hanging out the bottom of the points distributor connects to the
minus ( - ) side of the coil. (it goes from points to minus side of the coil)
****for future ref with white paint stick mark a large - and + on the coil. when you are cold, tired and the wind is blowing up your jacket (and your wife is asking if you got it fixed yet) it will help to see those marks and not have to rely on memory.

points distributor cap terminals --
#2 is the first terminal CW of the "door" in the distributor cap where you adjust the points.
firing order is 1 - 8 - 4 -3 - 6- 5- 7 - 2
with masking tape label points distributor cap terminals, HEI distributor terminals, and each HEI spark plug wire near the spark plug.
driver side front to back 1, 3, 5, 7 ..... and passenger side front to back 2,4, 6, 8;
pull the plug wires off each spark plug BUT leave them connected to distributor cap.
remove HEI distributor cap with spark plug wires still attached. lay that aside for now.
NOTE position of HEI distributor rotor. if it points to 6 o'clock, write on a 3x5 card "rotor to 6 o'clock" and tape that card on inner fender.
-loosen hold-down bolt ( 9/16" wrench) and remove HEI distributor
-install points distributor with rotor pointing to 6 o'clock (if that is what you wrote on the 3x5 card taped to the inner fender). the points distributor rotor must point exactly as did the HEI distributor rotor.
-hand tighten the hold-down bolt. later you will need to turn the distributor by hand when setting the timing.
you bought new AC 44 plugs and gapped them 0.035".
-now install the new spark plugs.
-install the points distributor cap.
-install the new plug wires one at a time. using the HEI distributor cap and wires as a guide.
-connect dwell tachometer black clip to ground, red clip to "minus" side of coil
-open the window in the distributor cap, and stick the allen wrench (with long handle) in the points adjust knob.
-connect battery ground cable to alternator bracket.
-remove vacuum hose from distributor, and plug that end of the hose
-with starter turning engine, turn allen wrench to adjust points so dwell reads 30.(book specs 29 to 31)
to set timing:
- with engine idling.
- the vacuum advance hose is still plugged.
- turn distributor CCW to attain max idle RPM, then CW to 200 rpm less than max
unplug vacuum advance hose. connect unplugged hose to vacuum advance on distributor.

with 9/16" wrench tighten distributor hold-down bolt.
if engine pings or rattles on acceleration:
-- disconnect and plug vacuum advance hose
-- connect dwell tachometer, black to ground , red to minus side of coil
-- loosen hold-down bolt and turn distributor CCW to max idle RPM, then CW to 300 RPM less than max idle RPM.
--tighten hold-down bolt to secure distributor
-- unplug and reconnect vacuum advance hose to distributor
__________________


Just this to add:
Posted by seamus on October 29, 2002, 11:01 pm , in reply to "Re: EMP counter measures "

You shoulda written a GM Engine Tuning For Dummies, Vlad. You got it down so even Dumb Dora can do it.

Now let me tell ya how we changed points in the shop.

-Since the engine will start if the points gap (which governs dwell angle, the number degrees of distributor rotation that the points remain closed) is close to .024", we'd install the point set and eyeball the gap to that.
-You can use a batchbook cover if yer eye's outta cal'.
-Then we'd crank it up and slowly turn the adjustment CC (or was it CW?)to the point where the engine began to stumble, then back the other way til it began to ping. The correct dwell would be -- within limits -- at the midpoint between the two.
-Timing can be done the same way, using the method Vlad mentioned but listening for the "ping and stumble" and setting midpoint between.
-When doing timing OR dwell by this method, make the adjustment as smoothly as possible to make changes in engine sound more easily detectable. Keeping the distributor clamp screw just finger snug will make this easier when doing the timing.
-I toss this on the pile because there will be times when ya just do no have a dwell tach in yer pocket and have to change out ignition components that require adjustment. Get in tune with the pitch and sound of a properly tuned engine running at idle.

When I was doing this stuff regularly in my shop (I once was an automotive masochistic), I could by ear tell engine speed within 50 RPM -- no BS on this. If you are serious about this stuff, get intimate with yer mo-gator. The more you do this stuff the easier it becomes to smell when dey is a rotten herrign in der four barrel. I jus' trew dat one in fer da halibut.

Responses:
Re: Just this to add: - vlad October 30, 2002, 8:08 am


----------------------------

Pack 73-86 GMC/Chevy 3/4 ton 4x4 front wheel bearings

as always read instructions three times before you do anything else

you will need a metal pie plate and large magnet
- place magnet in center of pie plate.
- place small parts on magnet.
they will be there when you look for them
special 3/8" drive socket for castellated nut inside hub
3/8" allen wrench
3/8" drive breaker bar
3/8 x 16 x 3" bolt
-wheel bearing grease
-spindle grease seal
-hub grease seals

-- chock rear wheel front and back
-- loosen front wheel lug nuts
-- raise front of truck on jack
-- place stands under axle housing
-- remove front wheel
-- with 3/8 allen wrench remove bolts that secure brake caliper
( place bolts on magnet in pie plate)
-- remove brake caliper and secure it WITHOUT stretching or kinking brake hose
-- remove hub
-- with snap ring plier remove snap ring
-- with special socket remove outer castellated nut
-- remove the washer (++ note that it has a pin that fits into a hole in the inner
castellated nut)
-- remove inner castellated nut
-- remove rotor
-- remove the six nuts that secure the spindle
-- remove the spindle. it may be necessary to tap spindle with a brass hammer to remove it . do not use a steel hammer as that will mar the spindle


-remove oil seal on inner side of rotor
-remove inner wheel bearing. wash it in solvent. dry it. apply new grease. put a golf ball size lump of grease in the palm of your left hand. place new bearing on the lump of grease. place right hand over left. squeeze hands tegother to force grease intot he new bearing.
-place greased new bearing in the inner side of rotor. place new oil seal. with a brass hammer, or wooden handle very gently tap around the seal seating it.

-remove oil seal from spindle. remove old spindle bearing. grease and install new spindle bearing, install new spindle seal.


NOTE in reassembly, screw the 3/8x16x3" bolt into the threaded hole in the end of the axle. pull outward on the axle so you can get the snapring on.

PS Buy new wheel bearings and spindle bearings and seals to keep in reserve. Open each package. Grease the new bearings. Wrap and put them back in the package. This will serve to keep them from rusting; and allow you to install greased bearings in the field. Keep the new bearings and seals in the toolbox on your truck.
 

Pathfinder

Inactive
Army surplus.

A duece and a half would work dont ya think? ;)

I have been checking into government auctions, and like the van bodied dueces. :cool:
 
If'n y'all would start driving Fords, ya wouldn't have to pack so damn many spare parts for on the road repairs.

I don't need a spare fuel pump, distributor, carb floats.....etc....etc...etc.

Just a roll of bailing wire and duct tape.

Even though, lately, as my truck has aged, I've been considering throwing in a can of WD-40:D

Just food for thought mind ya.


P.S., and no joking, my '81 Ford, 4 speed 4x4, gets 20 miles to the gallon, empty or loaded to the gills (I frenquently haul 1 and a half tons plus.)
 

The Mountain

Here since the beginning
_______________
Pathfinder, check into JoeYoung.com, easternsurplus.net, or go to http://vmsone.com/~opcom/mt.htm where there are a bunch of links to Deuce dealers. You can pick up a deuce for less than $5k. Maintenance will be a bit of a bear, unless you are a diesel mechanic or know one well. The drivetrain, at least the axles, will be pretty easy to maintain, since they are becoming popular in the offroad scene just now. Just be ready for a boneshaker ride, and not much passenger space (if you can find anyone willing to ride with you). Also, fuel consumption is in the 8-10mpg range even on the highway.
 

Hamilton Felix

Inactive
That 1976 GM truck is OK, because it's a very common rig. With other makes, 1976 might be too old. My old ugly 1966 Internation one-ton almost never breaks ----- but if it does, finding hubs for a Dana 70F front axle can be difficult. Cornbinder parts can be very confusing. I have to agree that the GM 3/4 ton of a vintage you can still work on is a good all-round choice.

BTW, one of my "when I get time" projects is a 1952 M38A1, still 24 volt with a big handful of original military spares.
 
I'm partial to...........

A K-5 4x4 Diesel Chevy Blazer,Very good mileage to weight ratio.Lots of room.And there are alot of surplus ones around too.;)
 

Hamilton Felix

Inactive
You know, I think it would be great fun to have one of those military CUCV Blazers. My "work car," since 1979 has been:

A 1979 Jimmy with Carbureted 350 and full time four wheel drive (HD front springs and hard ride);

a 1987 Jimmy with TBI 305, part time 4WD and automatic hubs (which actually worked). Standard front springs gave a nice ride;

a 1995 full size Ford Bronco, with injected 351. The dual front shocks don't increase damping all that much. I think this is just about the last year of the big Bronco. It came with automatic hubs, but within the first winter or two, we found that two of the three Broncos we'd acquired in that group had broken their hubs. Warn Heavy Duty hubs were much cheaper, and I don't mind getting out to engage them.

I'm not sure what they'll give me next -- or if they will -- as I type this, I have 239 days, 13 hours, 48 minutes until I officially have thirty years here and can take full retirement.

Despite the above employer-supplied vehicles, I've never owned a vehicle of this type. I did once drool all over a beautiful mid-90's Blazer with 6.5 turbodiesel, but I could not have afforded it unless I traded in our Suburban, and She Who Must Be Obeyed really likes HER Suburban...;) I know I like these rigs for work cars, while my employer buys the gas and maintains them.

I think the 90's Blazer/Jimmy/Tahoe/Yukon/whatever they call 'em now has the best rear seat design and use of space in that area. I prefer the older solid axle and leaf spring suspension for durability and ease of modification. I have insisted on skid plates for my work rigs. Our personal Suburban also has skid plates. I wouldn't turn down either that '79 Jimmy or the '87 Jimmy, if given to me now.

Since most of the roads in these parts were once logging roads, a big Blazer or Bronco should fit on them. For REAL backwoods adventure, I still want to get my little M38A1 Jeep restored and equipped with a winch.

I understand the CUCV Blazers were accompanied by similar pickups and a few Suburban "command cars." I'm told that all had the 6.2 diesel, turbohydramatic 400 and "one-ton" axles. I guess the ideal fleet would be one of each and a good stock of spare parts.

If I ever "fall into" a good Blazer, I'll hang onto it. But right now, I'm "car poor." ;)
 

The Mountain

Here since the beginning
_______________
Hamilton, for the record, the CUCV M1008 and M1009 (pickup and blazer respectively) are the only two GMs that were used by the military. Any suburbans were one-offs bought individually (and I have never seen one in camouflage). The Blazer was rated at 3/4 ton, and had the standard GM corporate 10-bolt (bolts on the differential cover) axles and extra spring leafs. The pickups were mostly single-rear-wheel, and had a Dana 60 front axle and the Corporate 14-bolt rear axle (some had Dana 70s), and were rated at 5/4 ton like the HMMWV (also extra spring leafs). There are a very few duallys that were rated for combat, mostly to carry small radio shelters and the like, and there are a very small number of crew cabs that were not camouflaged for use on flight lines and the like. All the combat trucks had the naturally-aspirated 6.2 diesel and the TH400 transmission, but also almost all of them had the particularly crappy NP208 aluminum transfer case. Some very few (good luck finding one) of the combat pickups had the NP205 iron gear-driven case, but they are for the most part already scavenged by the hard-core offroaders looking for the elusive NP205/TH400 combo (capable of handling more than 500ft/lbs of torque right out of the box). Also, almost all CUCVs intended for combat use had the execrable gov-lock locking rear differential, though there are rumors that some had the king-hell Detroit Locker.
 

Hamilton Felix

Inactive
Sounds like, at this late date, the CUCV Blazers and Pickups probably aren't worth pursuing. Don't know where I heard about the Suburbans, but it sounds like they are mostly a myth. I do like the idea of the hefty axles and the Dana 60 front on the pickup. Maybe that's because my International "one-ton" has a Dana 70F in front and a monstrous Timken (truck Engineer told me the smallest of that type is 10,000 lb.) under the rear. Heavy duty is good, even if you have to sacrifice a little axle clearance.

Of course, normal people don't use a pickup for a bulldozer or log skidder. For general transportation in rough terrain, a mildly modified Blazer is probably just great.

Old enough to work on, common enough to easily find parts -- that's the goal for our survival 4x4:D
 

The Mountain

Here since the beginning
_______________
Actually, the CUCV is very much worth pursuing. They are all about 1986 vintage, generally have low miles, can be had for exceptionally low prices and are all standard GM parts except for the 24volt starters (and there are many pages that discuss the easy conversion to 12v should you be interested). They are very much TEOTWAWKI-proof, since they are diesel, and have almost no electronics at all. If you can work around the NP208, whose main failing is that it does not have a fixed rear yoke, but rather a slipjoint (a failing from a leisure-time offroader's perspective), then they are good reliable (though slow) trucks. The rear axle on either truck can be replaced with a corporate 14-bolt out of another truck to beef it up for very little cost. That 14-bolt, with an open differential, can be converted to a Detroit Locker for about $350, which is ridiculously cheap for a locker. Besides, even in original form, they were still good enough for the Army.
 

Hamilton Felix

Inactive
Hmmm....

.... I'll keep that in mind. I'm going to need "something" to take over most of the chores and let the old International exist only for special jobs and off-highway work. We're broke at present, but I'll keep eyes and ears open in the future. That CUCV pickup might be pretty good, especially if you could toss in a dump conversion.

And I like camo a lot better than "shiny." :D

Merry Christmas!
 

Opus Dei

Inactive
The GM 379 diesel (6.2L) was a terribly weak engine, but I really liked it. Simple and naturally aspirated. The fuel filter on the earlier ones was tough to remove, as it was under the intake manifold. I had a Suburban 4x4 with the 379, and it was very competent in mud. Pulling a trailer, it was slow. Had a 4x2 crew cab with the same engine.

I wouldn't mind a Blazer with the 379, myself. For a reliable diesel pickup, the Ford SRW 4x4 1-tons with the 420 (6.9L)/solid axle were great.
 

north runner

Inactive
The older Ford 7.3L diesel 4x4 SRW 1 ton without the turbo is great (if you can find someone who will part with one).

My ideal survival vehicle though would be more along the lines of a 4x4 atv. Grizzley 660 or Arctic Cat 650.
 
Last edited:

Satanta

Stone Cold Crazy
_______________
A really well-built vehicle that almost no one considers so they are sheap for the taking is the late-mid 70's Jeep Cherokee. The big boxy ones. Had one in Florida and I still miss it sorely. Just about had to get hit with a train doing 70 to kill it. By the time I lost it due to health and income probs it was running on a busted radiator with a slipping timing belt and almost no brakes and I had to put oil in it at near every stop. I had the front end fall off due to the brake pad rivets cutting into the rotors and it cost me less than $150 to replace the whole shebang. I replaced the tranny for less than $70. Parts from other cars can be made to fit. All the electronics were gone from the motor.

If I had the $$ I'd look into another just for a BOV.

Hell, I git a tree doing 40 and all it did was stall.

Won't tell you about the time I ended up parrelel to a train inside the crossing arm between it and the tracks. :D


Or the time I checked the oil then drove five miles to do some offoraoding and noticed smoke coming from under the hood-opened it to find I'd left the dipstick on the engine and it was sitting on the battery and making a contact and glowing white hot. :D

I love those old Jeeps and they don't attract as much attention as a decked out B;azer or Bronco does.
 

Hamilton Felix

Inactive
LOL! Reminds me of back in my gas pump jockey days, when Men were Men and State Troopers drove big 440 Mopars. My buddy managed to get the dipstick of Trooper K's Polara across the big Ford style solenoid that supplied the motor driven siren. The dipstick turned red, and it got really LOUD under that hood! :D

The Cherokee you are talking about is the same large vehicle as the original Wagoneer, but two door and less fancy. Right? Good point. There are about a zillion of 'em still out there for cheap. Solid axles, leaf springs, simple to maintain and/or modify. Good deal.
 

tsherry

Inactive
While I love where this thread has gone, doesn't someone think that it's a little bit dumb to plow a bunch of money into a vehicle that, once the gas on board is gone, and that in the spare tanks, will be useless?

The 'bug out vehicle' is great, in the event that you can leave ahead of the majority of others in the case of a 'Triple Ought' economic meltdown, or WWIII nuclear attack.

If you aren't out immediately, you'll likely never be. Too many disabled cars in your way, clogging the roads, don't you think?

If you do get out, and have any distance to drive, you'll see others along the road (armed?) who'll eye your ride with the hunger of the desperate. Beyond the normal 'run out of gas range' which could be a several hundred mile radius around a major population center, you'll find no gas.

Assuming you make it to your safe haven, you can also assume that using your expensive 4x4 for anything that involves travel will be outright dangerous. You'll be the only thing moving--and therefore, a target. Besides that, where the heck do you think you need to go? The 7-11? The ATM?

I do understand the need to have an EMP proof vehicle. Most of mine are '60's Fords. I do have a new Ford that will be a really big paperweight in the event of an EMP pulse.

I guess the point is, if you think you need to bug out of where you are, you'd be waaaaay better off moving there, now, rather than planning on having it both ways. Chances are, you'll be money ahead by buying your country house, a reliable EMP proof vehicle, and dumping your city lifestyle.

Either that, or toss the idea of a gas vehicle completely, buy a diesel, and a boatload of fuel storage. But then again, where do you plan on driving, once you're there?

IMO.
 

Hamilton Felix

Inactive
A valid point

It's true that if we're expecting the Big Collapse, fuel will soon vanish. And gasoline is much worse for long term storage than diesel.

Maybe we should go to diesel. Make it simple, older diesels, and even replace the solenoid fuel shutoff with a manual valve. If it's small enough that you can coast and bump start it, you have a rig that needs NO electricity in any way to function.

Maybe I should look for that diesel version of the Kawasaki KLR650 that the military has. There's a bugout vehicle, assuming you need only get your own valuable carcass to your well-supplied retreat.

Consider this:
The New Fighting Kawasaki!

The photo at right shows the current issue M1030 M1 Diesel Kawasaki motorcycle approved by the US Military. It's expected to be adopted by Great Britain and the Pentagon's peace keeping forces as well. This machine (with a kaki paint job) is being deployed with forces near Afghanistan now. It's basically a Kawasaki KLS 650 that has been modified to run on diesel fuel instead of gasoline. Motorcycle are the last remaining vehicles in common use on the modern battle field with a need for gasoline. The 584cc water cooled engine puts out 24hp. and can get up to 120 MPG. The diesel powerplant is much more durable than it's petroleum burning counterpart and has even better cross country ability. It produces the desired bottom end power for low speed maneuvers and ascending steep grades with it's re-geared Kawasaki transmission. Maximum speed is about 80 MPH. It should also fair much better in submerged conditions like other military diesels (no spark plugs or wires to short out).

The most important reason for the diesel changeover is the supply of fuel to forces in the field. Now the bikes can drink from the same jug as the rest of the motorpool. Just pull her right up between those Main Battle Tanks and fill 'er up! With the induction of this bike into the ranks, gasoline is virtually eliminated from the supply chain as strategist and planners have worked towards for years. Not to mention the fact that you really don't want a gallon or two of hi-test between yer legs in a fire fight. You have better odds on shrapnel passing through your diesel tank without igniting the liquid.

The United Kingdom Defense Procurement Agency is considering the Kawasaki fighting bikes for their forces and tested the Marine Corp model at Chertsey some months back.

The Crown reports of the new Kawasaki:


"The driving force for this revolutionary motorbike engine design is the need for a single source of fuel on the battlefield. Other tangible benefits to the design include significantly better fuel consumption; lower emissions; better cross-country usability and greater low down torque. The prototype design is the only contender at the moment for the new general purpose, cross-country dispatch bike for all three services. An air-portable version for the Joint Rapid Reaction Force is also planned, together with further variants for the Royal Military police."

"The pre-production bike is being developed and evaluated in conjunction with the United States Marine Corps. The requirement is for a good all-round bike, simple to ride cross-country, powerful, reliable and easy to train soldiers on. Other NATO forces are interested in the design and there could be a large export market in the developing world where diesel is easier to source than petrol. Further civil applications include lightweight, high-powered industrial diesel generators, All Terrain Vehicles and quadbikes."
 

Attachments

  • usmc-mc-training.jpg
    usmc-mc-training.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 58
Top