How about 'none of the above'.

Troke

On TB every waking moment
Link went off into the mist somewhere.

Mainstream media provided lavish coverage of Barack Obama's trip abroad the week of July 21-25 and predicted he would get a bounce in the polls. Some of his supporters believe he has put the election away. Other observers employ the hackneyed and meaningless phrase, "It's his to lose."

The poll numbers tell a different and more nuanced story. The two national tracking polls showed Obama getting a bounce while he was in Europe, especially after his speech before 200,000 or so Berliners in the Tiergarten. Gallup showed him rising from a 46 percent-42 percent lead on July 22 to a 49 percent-40 percent lead on July 26. The Rasmussen tracking poll showed him rising from a 47 percent-45 percent lead on July 23 (reflecting the previous days' polling) to 49 percent to 43 percent on July 26.

But over the next several days, Obama bounced back down. Gallup showed him leading by a statistically insignificant 45 percent to 44 percent as of July 31. That's the closest the race has been in Gallup all that month. Rasmussen had him down to 48 percent to 46 percent on the same day. The world tour bounce has begun to look like a bubble.

But read the whole thing, as it's not exactly jolly news for McCain, either. I wonder how "none of the above" would poll?

As I have pointed out before, DW plays Bridge with a bunch of ladies who in an earlier day were heavy in the State political scene, repped the Congressmen, worked in DEECEE, that good stuff. Mostly Demo. And all she hears from both sides is "Is this the best we can do?"

I think 'None of the above' might get a plurality of the vote.
 

Delta

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I've voted lesser-of-two, I've voted against, and I've voted third party. This year I'm ready for none.

I wonder if Obama's bounce in Europe was actually because everyone was glad to have him and the press corp out of the country. . . . sort of a national urning for a William King type of president. (King having been outside of the US the entire time he was vice president.)
 

SouthernGal

"Don't retreat...reload"
Georgia doesn't allow write ins either. So, I'll be voting only for Senator Saxby Chambliss (while holding my nose). I won't vote at all for president.
 

Ogre

Veteran Member
I understand all the "None of the above" and write-in and protests votes. The one reason why I will not join you is the fact that the next president will, in all probability, nominate one and possibly two Supreme Court Justices.

The possibility of that power being in the hands of Barack Obama terrifies me, and I think it will be the death knell of our country.
Ogre
 

FREEBIRD

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The scare tactic of appointing SCOTUS judges quit working on me when I figured out that a lot of the judges appointed by so-called conservative Republicans vote like judges appointed by liberal Democrats.

None of 'em can read the Constitution.
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
Excellent observation! And the reason why is that the 'liberal' judges get invited to all the best parties. And if they are a 'moderate' that 'grew' on the job, that's even better.

Bet Judge Thomas doesn't get invited near as much as some of his 'liberal' associates.

So the temptation is to 'grow' in the position and so doing, go Left.
 
Top