ENER Crash tests indicate nation's guardrail system can't handle heavy electric vehicles

Bud in Fla

Veteran Member
There's not much mention of the results of a normal vehicle being hit by an EV but considering what happened with the guard rails & concrete barriers in the video, there's probably going to be a lot more fatalities in wrecks soon.
Filed under energy for being EV related and there's not a file for infrastructure.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



By The Associated Press
Published: Feb. 1, 2024 at 10:25 PM EST


LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — Electric vehicles that typically weigh more than gasoline-powered cars can easily crash through steel highway guardrails that are not designed to withstand the extra force, raising concerns about the nation’s roadside safety system, according to crash test data released Wednesday by the University of Nebraska.
Electric vehicles typically weigh 20% to 50% more than gas-powered vehicles thanks to batteries that can weigh almost as much as a small gas-powered car. And they have lower centers of gravity. Because of these differences, guardrails can do little to stop electric vehicles from pushing through barriers typically made of steel.

Last fall, engineers at Nebraska’s Midwest Roadside Safety Facility watched as an electric-powered pickup truck hurtled toward a guardrail installed on the facility’s testing ground on the edge of the local municipal airport. The nearly 4-ton (3.6 metric ton) 2022 Rivian R1T tore through the metal guardrail and hardly slowed until hitting a concrete barrier yards away on the other side.
“We knew it was going to be an extremely demanding test of the roadside safety system,” said Cody Stolle with the facility. “The system was not made to handle vehicles greater than 5,000 pounds.”

The university released the results of the crash test at a time when the rising popularity of electric vehicles has led transportation officials to sound the alarm over the weight disparity of the new battery-powered vehicles and lighter gas-powered ones. Last year, the National Transportation Safety Board expressed concern about the safety risks heavy electric vehicles pose if they collide with lighter vehicles.

Road safety officials and organizations say the electric vehicles themselves appear to offer superior protection to their occupants, even if they might prove dangerous to occupants of lighter vehicles. The Rivian truck tested in Nebraska showed almost no damage to the cab’s interior after slamming into the concrete barrier, Stolle said. In response to the release of the test results Wednesday, Rivian Automotive Inc. noted that the truck used in the testing received a 2023 Top Safety Pick+ award, the highest tier award issued by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

But the entire purpose of guardrails, found along tens of thousands of miles of roadway, is to help keep passenger vehicles from leaving the road, said Michael Brooks, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Auto Safety. Guardrails are intended to keep cars from careening off the road at critical areas, such as over bridges and waterways, near the edges of cliffs and ravines and over rocky terrain, where injury and death in an off-the-road crash are much more likely.

“Guardrails are kind of a safety feature of last resort,” Brooks said. “I think what you’re seeing here is the real concern with EVs — their weight. There are a lot of new vehicles in this larger-size range coming out in that 7,000-pound range. And that’s a concern.”
The preliminary crash test sponsored by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Research and Development Center also involved a Tesla sedan crash, in which the sedan lifted the guardrail and passed under it. The tests showed the barrier system is likely to be overmatched by heavier electric vehicles, officials said.

The extra weight of electric vehicles comes from their outsized batteries needed to achieve a travel range of about 300 miles (480 kilometers) per charge.

“So far, we don’t see good vehicle-to-guardrail compatibility with electric vehicles,” Stolle said.
More testing, involving computer simulations and test crashes of more electric vehicles, is planned, he said, and will be needed to determine how to engineer roadside barriers that minimize the effects of crashes for both lighter gas-powered vehicles and heavier electric vehicles.

“Right now, electric vehicles are at or around 10% of new vehicles sold, so we have some time,” Stolle said. “But as EVs continue to be sold and become more popular, this will become a more prevalent problem. There is some urgency to address this.”
The facility has seen this problem before. In the 1990s, as more people began buying light-weight pickups and sport utility vehicles, the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility found that the then-50-year-old guardrail system was proving inadequate to handle their extra weight. So, it went about redesigning guardrails to adapt.

“At the time, lightweight pickups made up 10-to-15% of the vehicle fleet,” Stolle said. “Now, more than 50% of vehicles on the road are pickups and SUVs.”

“So, here we are trying to do the same thing again: Adapt to the changing makeup of vehicles on the road.”
It’s impossible to know what that change will look like, Stolle said.

“It could be concrete barriers. It could be something else,” he said. “The scope of what we have to change and update still remains to be determined.”

Philip Jones, executive director of the Alliance for Transportation Electrification, which supports the use of electric vehicles in North America, questioned why electric vehicles were singled out in the testing, noting that several large SUV models can weigh around 6,000 pounds.

“The EVs are not necessarily heavier,” Jones said. “I drive a Chevy Bolt, and it’s 3,700 pounds.”

But he acknowledged that, on the whole, the first generation of electric vehicles are heavier than their gas-powered counterparts. Successive generations are likely to be lighter, he said, as manufacturers work to make smaller batteries that carry more power.
The U.S. Federal Highway Administration declined to immediately comment on the Nebraska test results.

The concern over the weight of electric vehicles stretches beyond vehicle-to-vehicle crashes and compatibility with guardrails, Brooks said. The extra weight will affect everything from faster wear on residential streets and driveways to vehicle tires and infrastructure like parking garages.

“A lot of these parking structures were built to hold vehicles that weighed 2,000 to 4,000 pounds — not 10,000 pounds,” he said.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — Electric vehicles that typically weigh more than gasoline-powered cars can easily crash through steel highway guardrails that are not designed to withstand the extra force, raising concerns about the nation’s roadside safety system, according to crash test data released Wednesday by the University of Nebraska.

I wonder what impact these EV's are having on the roads, especially since engineers have been cutting every corner possible, in the past forty years, to increase gas milage while reducing impact on roads.
 

Jeff Allen

Producer
Wow...after Covid and people here still believe ANYTHING the liars in the MSM claim? Shame.
Toyota rav 4 AWD weighs 4,300lbs
My Tesla model Y weighs 4,400lbs
My F250 4x4 weighs 7,500lbs
My RAM 2500 weighs 6,400 BEFORE I added a couple thousand pounds of stuff....
Mercy. Quit being lazy, the MSM is 100% lies. All these weights are just a quick few keystrokes away.
MSM hype and lies...Tesla has done zero advertising to date. Hmmmm...I wonder why ALL MSM tesla stories are negative. hmmm...difficult to figure out...LOL. Turns out the right is just as easily led to the slaughter as the left....

J
 

dvo

Veteran Member
So…the guard rails are completely useless. All of those 18 wheelers flying around at greater speed than I drive aren’t going to be contained either. On some interstates, they outnumber cars. It was all a government safety illusion.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
So…the guard rails are completely useless. All of those 18 wheelers flying around at greater speed than I drive aren’t going to be contained either. On some interstates, they outnumber cars. It was all a government safety illusion.

I don't know how often you travel I80 through Iowa, there are several very long stretches with those guard rails dividing east/west bound traffic, and from the accidents I've seen involving 18 wheelers those guard rails offer very little protection. It was my impression that they are designed to keep cars and small trucks, from crossing the median and ending up in oncoming traffic.

Jeff Allen I think what you are missing is the sheer momentum of that battery when it comes to impact. Those batteries look pretty solid, mass wise, compared to a regular car where the only things in the back of the car would be the spare tire and maybe some baby seats.
 

Jeff Allen

Producer
The batteries in all Teslas are a flat pack at the bottom of the vehicle. They are not "in the back of the car".
What does matter to YOU as a vehicle occupant is the distribution of that weight if you take an unscheduled trip off road at speed. Then you are MUCH better off with the weight at the bottom of the vehicle as opposed to a big metal engine suspended well above the frame. This is why Teslas have 5 star ratings for tip over by NHTSA, their weight is very low on the frame.
J
 

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I don't know how often you travel I80 through Iowa, there are several very long stretches with those guard rails dividing east/west bound traffic, and from the accidents I've seen involving 18 wheelers those guard rails offer very little protection. It was my impression that they are designed to keep cars and small trucks, from crossing the median and ending up in oncoming traffic.

Those are to stop "crossovers". They deflect cars, big trucks will usually flip onto their sides.
If someone falls a sleep and the car/truck veers into it its a glancing blow. Not going to hold if the vehicle is going high speed right square into it.
 

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I think this article is full of shit as well.

I'd be more worried about the physical load when dealing with parking decks.
They are heavier than regular cars. And because of the low height the parking garages are not going to be designed for heavy trucks just due to the fact they can't fit.
 

mikeabn

Finally not a lurker!
As an Outside Plant Engineer for what is now Verizon I learned, "you can't change just one thing on a print " Electric cars are going to require a whole new ecosystem, or transitsystem if you will, to work properly. I just don't see it being economically feasible, not to mention the issues individual owners will have.
 

Jeff Allen

Producer
As an Outside Plant Engineer for what is now Verizon I learned, "you can't change just one thing on a print " Electric cars are going to require a whole new ecosystem, or transitsystem if you will, to work properly. I just don't see it being economically feasible, not to mention the issues individual owners will have.
I think you are absolutely correct. The current public super charging infrastructure for Tesla works for someone like me who is interested in the tech, and lets just be blunt...not stupid. The average (or worse, the below...and significantly below average clown) cannot survive without charging infrastructure EVERYWHERE....think about how many people run out of gas when there is gas EVERYWHERE.....magnify x 10000 when there is only charging every 80 miles and only on interstates in the Midwest.
I think they need at minimum 3-4x charging infrastructure before idiots can use BEV's.
J
 

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
Oh NO!!

Not another piece of the FJB&Co EV solution which didn't get a lot of research before the idiot started issuing all those ExecOrders etc.?
 
Top