Vaccines Brazil Shrunken Heads Zika Virus or GM Mosquitoes

NC Susan

Deceased
4000 babies just born with shrunken heads in last 90 days in Brazil

Is it the dTap purtusis vaccines administered at 22 weeks of pregnancy or the GM Mosquitoes recently released

----------

http://yournewswire.com/is-zika-virus-or-the-dtap-vaccine-causing-birth-defects-in-brazil/

Is Zika Virus Or The Tdap Vaccine Causing Birth Defects In Brazil?
Posted on January 28, 2016 by Carol Adl in Health

The Zika virus has been known to infect people in Africa, South and Central America and Asia for more than 70 years without causing any birth defects.

The Brazilian government declared an emergency in December after 2,400 babies were found to be born with shrunken heads and brain defects believed to be linked to mosquitoes carrying the Zika Virus. The number of babies born with the defects has been rising significantly since then.

But could there be a link between the introduction of the Tdap vaccination that women in Latin America were urged to get before they were 22 weeks pregnant, and the birth of babies with these deformities called “Microcephaly” (literally ‘tiny head’)?

The following is an article from Brazilian shrunken head babies blog:

In late 2014, the Ministry of Health of Brazil announced the introduction of the Tdap (Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccine for all pregnant women in that country as part of its routine vaccination program. The move was aimed at trying to contain the resurgence of pertussis in Brazil.



In December 2015, the Brazilian government declared an emergency after 2,400 Brazilian babies were found to be born with shrunken heads (microcephaly) and damaged brains since October.

Brazilian public health officials don’t know what is causing the increase in microcephaly cases in babies born in Brazil, but they are theorizing that it may be caused by a virus known as “Zika,” which is spread by mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti)—in the same way as is the West Nile virus.

The theory is largely based on the fact that they found the Zika virus in a baby with microcephaly following an autopsy of the dead child. The virus was also found in the amniotic fluid of two mothers whose babies had the condition.

Note that Zika is not a new virus; it has been around for decades. No explanation has been given as to why suddenly it could be causing all these cases of microcephaly. No one is seriously asking the question, “What has changed?”

There is no theorizing about the possibility that the cases of microcephaly could be linked to the mandating of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women in Brazil about 10 months earlier. The government has “assumed” the cause is a virus.

FACT—Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S. and there is almost no data on inflammatory or other biological responses to this vaccine that could affect pregnancy and birth outcomes.

FACT—According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adequate testing has not been done in humans to demonstrate safety for pregnant women and it is not known whether the vaccines can cause fetal harm or affect reproduction capacity. The manufacturers of the Tdap vaccine state that human toxicity and fertility studies are inadequate and warn that Tdap should “be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.”

FACT—There are ingredients pertussis containing Tdap vaccine that have not been fully evaluated for potential genotoxic or other adverse effects on the human fetus developing in the womb that may negatively affect health after birth, including aluminum adjuvants, mercury containing (Thimerosal) preservatives and many more bioactive and potentially toxic ingredients.

FACT—There are serious problems with outdated testing procedures for determining the potency and toxicity of pertussis vaccines and some scientists are calling for limits to be established for specific toxin content of pertussis-containing vaccines.

FACT—There are no published biological mechanism studies that assess pre-vaccination health status and measure changes in brain and immune function and chromosomal integrity after vaccination of pregnant women or their babies developing in the womb.

FACT—Since licensure of Tdap vaccine in the U.S., there have been no well designed prospective case controlled studies comparing the health outcomes of large groups of women who get pertussis containing Tdap vaccine during pregnancy either separately or simultaneously compared to those who do not get the vaccines, and no similar health outcome comparisons of their newborns at birth or in the first year of life have been conducted. Safety and effectiveness evaluations that have been conducted are either small, retrospective, compare vaccinated women to vaccinated women or have been performed by drug company or government health officials using unpublished data.

FACT—FACT—The FDA has licensed Tdap vaccines to be given once as a single dose pertussis booster shot to individuals over 10 or 11 years old. The CDC’s recommendation that doctors give every pregnant woman a Tdap vaccination during every pregnancy—regardless of whether a woman has already received one dose of Tdap—is an off-label use of the vaccine.

FACT—Injuries and deaths from pertussis-containing vaccines are the most compensated claims in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) and influenza vaccine injuries and deaths are the second most compensated claim.

FACT—A 2013 published study evaluating reports of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following vaccination in the U. S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and in a European vaccine reaction reporting system found that pertussis containing DTaP was among the vaccines most frequently associated with brain inflammation in children between birth and age five.

Tdap is manufactured by two pharmaceutical companies: Sanofi Pasteur of France and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) of the United Kingdom.

The Sanofi Pasteur product contains aluminum phosphate, residual formaldehyde, residual glutaraldehyde, and 2-phenoxyethanola, along with the following growth mediums and process ingredients: Stainer-Scholte medium, casamino acids, dimethyl-beta-cyclodextrin, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, aluminum phosphate, modified Mueller-Miller casamino acid medium without beef heart infusion, ammonium sulfate, 2-phenoxyethanol, water for injection.

The GSK product contains aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, residual formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), along with the following growth mediums and process ingredients: modified Latham medium derived from bovine casein, Fenton medium containing bovine extract, formaldehyde, Stainer-Scholte liquid medium, glutaraldehyde, aluminum hydroxide.

Unsurprisingly, the Brazilian government announced on January 15, 2016 it will direct funds to a biomedical research center (Sao Paulo-based Butantan Institute) to help develop a vaccine against Zika. Development of the vaccine is expected to take 3-5 years. Again, no consideration to the irony that you may be developing a vaccine to address a problem that may have been CAUSED by a vaccine, and that that new vaccine may COMPOUND the problem No consideration to the possibility that the answer to the problem may not be to do MORE, but rather to do LESS (simply STOP giving Tdap to pregnant women).

The number of cases of microcephaly in Brazil has grown to 3,530 babies, as of mid-January 2016. Fewer than 150 such cases were seen in all of 2014.
 
Last edited:

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Has this vaccine been used in the US in that time period? If it had, you would see a lot more problems here as well. Is it Zika, something else, a combination? Scary situation all around.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://www.healthnutnews.com/breaking-zika-outbreak-epicenter-area-gm-mosquitoes-released-2015/

Breaking: Zika Outbreak Epicenter in Same Area Where GM Mosquitoes Were Released in 2015
January 29, 2016 by Erin Elizabeth

(ANTIMEDIA) U.S.A. — The World Health Organization announced it will convene an Emergency Committee under International Health Regulations on Monday, February 1, concerning the Zika virus ‘explosive’ spread throughout the Americas. The virus reportedly has the potential to reach pandemic proportions — possibly around the globe. But understandingwhy this outbreak happened is vital to curbing it. As the WHOstatement said:

“A causal relationship between Zika virus infection and birth malformations and neurological syndromes … is strongly suspected. [These links] have rapidly changed the risk profile of Zika, from a mild threat to one of alarming proportions.

“WHO is deeply concerned about this rapidly evolving situation for 4 main reasons: the possible association of infection with birth malformations and neurological syndromes; the potential for further international spread given the wide geographical distribution of the mosquito vector; the lack of population immunity in newly affected areas; and the absence of vaccines, specific treatments, and rapid diagnostic tests […]

“The level of concern is high, as is the level of uncertainty.”

Zika seemingly exploded out of nowhere. Though it was first discovered in 1947, cases only sporadically occurred throughout Africa and southern Asia. In 2007, the first case was reported in the Pacific. In 2013, a smattering of small outbreaks and individual cases were officially documented in Africa and the western Pacific. They also began showing up in the Americas. In May 2015, Brazil reported its first case of Zika virus — and the situation changed dramatically.

Brazil is now considered the epicenter of the Zika outbreak, which coincides with at least 4,000 reports of babies born with microcephaly just since October.

When examining a rapidly expanding potential pandemic, it’s necessary to leave no stone unturned so possible solutions, as well as future prevention, will be as effective as possible. In that vein, there was another significant development in 2015.

Oxitec first unveiled its large-scale, genetically-modified mosquito farm in Brazil in July 2012, with the goal of reducing “the incidence of dengue fever,” as The Disease Daily reported. Dengue fever is spread by the same Aedes mosquitoes which spread the Zika virus — and though they “cannot fly more than 400 meters,” WHO stated, “it may inadvertently be transported by humans from one place to another.” By July 2015, shortly after the GM mosquitoes were first released into the wild in Juazeiro, Brazil, Oxitec proudly announced they had “successfully controlled the Aedes aegypti mosquito that spreads dengue fever, chikungunya and zika virus, by reducing the target population by more than 90%.”

Though that might sound like an astounding success — and, arguably, it was — there is an alarming possibility to consider.

Nature, as one Redditor keenly pointed out, finds a way — and the effort to control dengue, zika, and other viruses, appears to have backfired dramatically.

Map showing the concentration of suspected Zika-related cases of microcephaly in Brazil.


The particular strain of Oxitec GM mosquitoes, OX513A, are genetically altered so the vast majority of their offspring will die before they mature — though Dr. Ricarda Steinbrecher published concerns in a report in September 2010 that a known survival rate of 3-4 percent warranted further study before the release of the GM insects. Her concerns, which were echoed by several other scientists both at the time and since, appear to have been ignored — though they should not have been.

Those genetically-modified mosquitoes work to control wild, potentially disease-carrying populations in a very specific manner. Only the male modified Aedes mosquitoes are supposed to be released into the wild — as they will mate with their unaltered female counterparts. Once offspring are produced, the modified, scientific facet is supposed to ‘kick in’ and kill that larvae before it reaches breeding age — if tetracycline is not present during its development. But there is a problem.

zika-mosquito
Aedes aegypti mosquito. Image credit: Muhammad Mahdi Karim
According to an unclassified document from the Trade and Agriculture Directorate Committee for Agriculture dated February 2015, Brazil is the third largest in “global antimicrobial consumption in food animal production” — meaning, Brazil is third in the world for its use of tetracycline in its food animals. As a study by the American Society of Agronomy, et. al., explained, “It is estimated that approximately 75% of antibiotics are not absorbed by animals and are excreted in waste.” One of the antibiotics (or antimicrobials) specifically named in that report for its environmental persistence is tetracycline.

In fact, as a confidential internal Oxitec document divulged in 2012, that survival rate could be as high as 15% — even with low levels of tetracycline present. “Even small amounts of tetracycline can repress” the engineered lethality. Indeed, that 15% survival rate was described by Oxitec:

“After a lot of testing and comparing experimental design, it was found that [researchers] had used a cat food to feed the [OX513A] larvae and this cat food contained chicken. It is known that tetracycline is routinely used to prevent infections in chickens, especially in the cheap, mass produced, chicken used for animal food. The chicken is heat-treated before being used, but this does not remove all the tetracycline. This meant that a small amount of tetracycline was being added from the food to the larvae and repressing the [designed] lethal system.”

Even absent this tetracycline, as Steinbrecher explained, a “sub-population” of genetically-modified Aedes mosquitoes could theoretically develop and thrive, in theory, “capable of surviving and flourishing despite any further” releases of ‘pure’ GM mosquitoes which still have that gene intact. She added, “the effectiveness of the system also depends on the [genetically-designed] late onset of the lethality. If the time of onset is altered due to environmental conditions … then a 3-4% [survival rate] represents a much bigger problem…”

As the WHO stated in its press release, “conditions associated with this year’s El Nino weather pattern are expected to increase mosquito populations greatly in many areas.”

Incidentally, President Obama called for a massive research effort to develop a vaccine for the Zika virus, as one does not currently exist. Brazil has now called in 200,000 soldiers to somehow help combat the virus’ spread. Aedes mosquitoes have reportedly been spotted in the U.K. But perhaps the most ironic — or not —proposition was proffered on January 19, by the MIT Technology Review:

“An outbreak in the Western Hemisphere could give countries including the United States new reasons to try wiping out mosquitoes with genetic engineering.

“Yesterday, the Brazilian city of Piracicaba said it would expand the use of genetically modified mosquitoes …

“The GM mosquitoes were created by Oxitec, a British company recently purchased by Intrexon, a synthetic biology company based in Maryland. The company said it has released bugs in parts of Brazil and the Cayman Islands to battle dengue fever.”

(Lots of images and maps at link)
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
4000 babies just born with shrunken heads in last 90 days in Brazil

Is it the dTap purtusis vaccines administered at 22 weeks of pregnancy or the GM Mosquitoes recently released

----------

http://yournewswire.com/is-zika-virus-or-the-dtap-vaccine-causing-birth-defects-in-brazil/

Is Zika Virus Or The Tdap Vaccine Causing Birth Defects In Brazil?
Posted on January 28, 2016 by Carol Adl in Health

The Zika virus has been known to infect people in Africa, South and Central America and Asia for more than 70 years without causing any birth defects.

The Brazilian government declared an emergency in December after 2,400 babies were found to be born with shrunken heads and brain defects believed to be linked to mosquitoes carrying the Zika Virus. The number of babies born with the defects has been rising significantly since then.

But could there be a link between the introduction of the Tdap vaccination that women in Latin America were urged to get before they were 22 weeks pregnant, and the birth of babies with these deformities called “Microcephaly” (literally ‘tiny head’)?

The following is an article from Brazilian shrunken head babies blog:

In late 2014, the Ministry of Health of Brazil announced the introduction of the Tdap (Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccine for all pregnant women in that country as part of its routine vaccination program. The move was aimed at trying to contain the resurgence of pertussis in Brazil.


Wait---WHAT?


The Braziliarn government is MANDATING that PREGNANT women be vaccinated with TETANUS vaccine?


Then yes, folks, THAT is the real problem---or at least could be part of it.


How do I know?


Before my oldest son was born, my first pregnancy was within months after my husband and I married.

Shortly after I learned I was pregnant, I was at my mother's, and she asked me to take her dog for a walk.

I took it next door to the church next to her house.

While standing there, holding my dog's leash, and staring out over the woods behind the church thinking about and trying to take in that I was EXPECTING---

I suddenly heard a LOUD yelp from my dog--and then the flurry of snarls and growls that come when two dogs are fighting.

A neighbor's pit bull---off a leash and not kept in a pen--had left its own doorstep and come clear across a parking lot the size of a baseball diamond to reach us and had ATTACKED my dog (little Border Collie).

I screamed, and tried to get the dog off my dog, but i had no weapon, not even a stick. I even pulled up a newly-planted 2-foot high bush the church had recently had put in, and started beating the dog with that. NOTHING phased him. Finally, in desperation, I LIFTED up my dog, trying to get him out of the reach of the pit bull. Of course, in doing so, I got bit by BOTH dogs--and the pit bull literally pulled my dog out of my arms. That was when I began beating him with the bush, and my dog managed--while he was distracted--to climb under the chain-link fence and get away from him.

I chased the neighbor's dog all the way back to his house, beating him with the bush all the way, and told the neighbor what had happened. I also asked to come in and wash the blood off, which was running down my arms from the bites. Her son went and got my dog, also badly wounded, and took him to the vets', while I went to a doc-in-the-box (only place open that time of evening, other than emergency rooms), to have my wounds seen to.

The doctor dressed and cleaned the wounds, but when they asked when my last tetanus shot was, I couldn't remember. They strongly recommended I get the shot. I told them I was pregnant, and asked would it harm my baby or cause me to miscarry. They hemmed and hawed, and finally said that if I "didn't" have the tetanus shot and got tetanus, that THAT would DEFINITELY hurt my baby and me, too.

So I got the shot.

Within 24 hours I miscarried---I started having cramps the very next morning.

I have since confirmed with several doctors that YES---especially in the FIRST trimester, TETANUS VACCINE DOES CAUSE MISCARRIAGE. (several OB-GYNS, not holistic doctors, so those of you who are rabidly pro-vaccine go argue with the OB-GYNs).

What it could do in the 2nd or 3rd trimester......hmmmmmmmm......


Could THAT be the cause of these microcephaly incidents?


Anyone remember thalidomide?
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
http://www.healthnutnews.com/breaking-zika-outbreak-epicenter-area-gm-mosquitoes-released-2015/

"so the vast majority of their offspring will die before they mature ..."

Hmmm----


so.....

is it a "leap" of logic to think the SAME effect might happen with "other" offspring, not just the mosquitoes' ---- and cause THAT offspring to actually NOT "mature"----as in arrested development of the brain / head?



Shades of Thalidomide and the karma of "unintended consequences"....
 

NC Susan

Deceased
Posted by Signwatcher on main
------------

Guess Who OWNS the Zika Virus?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/who-own...-virus/5505323

There are visuals in the article. I can't post them.

Who Owns the Zika Virus?
By Guillaume Kress
Global Research, February 03, 2016

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the Zika virus a global health emergency on Monday (February 1) without providing much detail on the disease. So here are some facts until we receive more information:

This sexually-transmitted virus has been around for 69 years and is marketed by two companies: LGC Standards (headquartered in the UK) and ATCC (headquartered in the US).

The LGC Group is:

“…the UK’s designated National Measurement Institute for chemical and bioanalytical measurements and an international leader in the laboratory services, measurement standards, reference materials, genomics and proficiency testing marketplaces.”

One of its branches, LGC Standards, is:

“…a leading global producer and distributor of reference materials and proficiency testing schemes. Headquartered in Teddington, Middlesex, UK, LGC Standards has a network of dedicated sales offices extending across 20 countries in 5 continents and more than 30 years experience in the distribution of reference materials. These high quality products and services are essential for accurate analytical measurement and quality control, ensuring sound decisions are made based on reliable data. We have an unparalleled breadth of ISO Guide 34 accredited reference material production in facilities at 4 sites across the UK, the US and Germany.”

LGC Standards entered into a partnership with ATCC, of which the latter is:

“…the premier global biological materials resource and standards organization whose mission focuses on the acquisition, authentication, production, preservation, development, and distribution of standard reference microorganisms, cell lines, and other materials. While maintaining traditional collection materials, ATCC develops high quality products, standards, and services to support scientific research and breakthroughs that improve the health of global populations.”

This “ATCC-LGC Partnership” is designed to facilitate:

“…the distribution of ATCC cultures and bioproducts to life science researchers throughout Europe, Africa, and India and [...] to make access to the important resources of ATCC more easily accessible to the European, African, and Indian scientific communities through local stock holding of more than 5,000 individual culture items supported by our local office network delivering the highest levels of customer service and technical support.”

And who owns the patent on the virus? The Rockefeller Foundation!

SEE HERE: Source: http://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/pro...try=es#history

Why has the issue of patent ownership of the Zika virus not been the object of media coverage?

Lest we forget the words of David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

Is the ownership of the Zika Virus by the Rockefeller Foundation part of that agenda of “supernational sovereignty [dominated] by an intellectual elite and world bankers…”?

Of significance, the Zika virus is a commodity which can be purchased online from the ATCC-LGC for Euro599.00, with royalties accruing to the Rockefeller Foundation.

The original source of this article is Global Research
 

Snyper

Veteran Member
http://www.healthnutnews.com/breaking-zika-outbreak-epicenter-area-gm-mosquitoes-released-2015/

"so the vast majority of their offspring will die before they mature ..."

Hmmm----


so.....

is it a "leap" of logic to think the SAME effect might happen with "other" offspring, not just the mosquitoes' ---- and cause THAT offspring to actually NOT "mature"----as in arrested development of the brain / head?



Shades of Thalidomide and the karma of "unintended consequences"....

DNA can't travel from a mosquito to a fetus, and the mosquitoes released don't bite.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
No mandatory vaccines in Columbia = no Shrunken Heads
-------------

Columbia Oresident confirms 3177 Pregnant women, no micrcephaly
Feb 7 2016
Gary Truthking

http://truthkings.com/2016/02/07/colombias-president-3177-zika-cases-no-microcephaly/

Colombia’s President Juan Manuel Santos said that of 3,177 confirmed Zika cases in pregnant women, no cases of Microcephaly exist. According to the Washington Post, a U.S. science team remains in route to investigate the matter. The link between Zika cases in pregnant women and Microcephaly remains unconfirmed officially, however, that hasn’t stopped the WHO and CDC from using scare tactics worldwide. The United States already has one state, Florida, under a state of emergency.

Again, I repeat, there is no confirmed link.

Health officials have also upped the ante on how people can contract Zika. In the United States, health officials are saying that it is now confirmed to spread similarly to an STD. They’ve now added kissing to the list of potential ways to contract the virus.

With global concern over the Zika virus growing, health officials are warning pregnant women to be careful about who they kiss and calling on men to use condoms with pregnant partners if they have visited countries where the virus is present.

Essentially, health officials continue to find new ways to scare citizens into thinking they are largely at risk for contracting this virus. They are creating a need for a vaccine out of a fear which remains unfounded. The situation still lacks any scientific evidence that pregnant women are even at risk from Zika virus. If Colombia has over 3,000 confirmed cases in pregnant women with no cases of Microcephaly, it would seem to me that this is clear evidence that the WHO is being irresponsible and overreacting. But with everyone already in fear mode, people have stopped seeing the light.

Vaccines are on the way and the vaccine makers already have a line out the door of pregnant women. Pregnant women, who will not even eat sushi, are about to get injections of an unknown and untested medication for purposes of protecting themselves from something which hasn’t even been proven to be a real threat. This is an overwhelmingly sad situation pitting large scale Government agencies against herds of citizens who refuse to question authority.
 
Top